Under Indiana Real Estate License Law, The definition of a psychologically affected home includes a home

A) Where a person dies

B) That is publicized in the community as being haunted

C) that was previously sold as a foreclosure

D) That is on the historic register

Answer: true

Explanation: Hope I helped!

Answer:

All Hazmat (hazard materials) employees must be properly licensed and receive general awareness and familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazardous materials.

Explanation:

This unique training is called the "HAZMAT Familiarization and Safety in Transportation" course. The course aims to provide the following trainings: applicability and responsibility, emergency response, general awareness/familiarization, and security awareness.  HAZMAT employees learn the hazard class  (gas, liquid, explosive, etc.) and what each class is capable of doing.  This knowledge allows the HAZMAT employee to safely transport or store hazardous materials and to correctly respond to emergencies that they could face.  The training also enables HAZMAT employees to safely control and contain a HAZMAT accident, thereby protecting the general public.

87 percent of law enforcement agencies use community policing. Thus, option A is the correct option.

Community policing is a widely embraced approach by law enforcement agencies, with a staggering 87 percent adoption rate. This approach focuses on building strong partnerships between law enforcement personnel and the communities they serve.

Through this collaborative effort, law enforcement agencies aim to address local issues and concerns, prevent crime, and improve public safety. Community policing strategies revolve around proactive engagement, problem-solving, and trust-building initiatives. By involving community members in decision-making processes, law enforcement agencies can tap into their invaluable knowledge and support to effectively identify and solve local problems.

This widespread utilization of community policing reflects its proven effectiveness and recognition among law enforcement agencies as a key tool for promoting safe and inclusive communities.

Thus, option A is the correct option.

Learn more about community policing here:

https://brainly.com/question/32898107

#SPJ6

Answer:

can u show the picture

Explanation:

I cant see anything

The constitutional amendment process difficult to safeguard the tenets of the framers' system of governance, the process for altering the constitution is purposefully made to be challenging.

No law establishing a particular religion, forbidding its practice, restricting press or speech freedom, or restricting the right of the people to peacefully assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances may be passed by Congress.

The 12th Amendment, which was enacted by Congress on December 9, 1803, and adopted by the state legislatures on June 15, 1804, fixed flaws in the previous electoral system that led to the contentious Presidential Election of 1880.

To learn more about state legislatures here:

https://brainly.com/question/10343428

#SPJ4

Answer:

true

hope this helps :)

Explanation:

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to all of the following individuals or groups except U.S. employers operating abroad or controlling foreign corporations.

The ADA is a federal law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities. It applies to various entities, including the House of Representatives, federal government employers, and private and public sector employers with fifteen or more employees. These entities are required to comply with the ADA's provisions, which include providing reasonable accommodations and ensuring equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities.

However, the ADA does not extend its jurisdiction to U.S. employers operating abroad or controlling foreign corporations. This means that employers outside the United States are not directly subject to the ADA's requirements.

To lern more about ADA click here :          brainly.com/question/30630257

#SPJ11

Answer:

a concurring opinion

Explanation: trust me

The 1884 election contest between James G. Blaine and Grover Cleveland was noted for being one of the most negative and scandalous presidential campaigns in American history.

Both Blaine and Cleveland were accused of unethical and corrupt practices, including bribery, fraud, and se-xual misconduct. Blaine, the Republican candidate, was embroiled in the "Mulligan letters" scandal, in which he was accused of receiving bribes from railroad executives. Cleveland, the Democratic candidate, was attacked for having fathered an illegitimate child and for his opposition to the use of federal funds for religious schools.

The campaign was also notable for the role of the press, which played a significant role in shaping public opinion through sensationalist and often partisan reporting. The campaign also saw the emergence of new campaign tactics, such as mass rallies and parades, as well as the use of cartoons and other forms of political propaganda.

Despite the scandals and negative campaigning, Cleveland ultimately won the election, becoming the first Democrat to win the presidency since the Civil War. The 1884 election has since been seen as a turning point in American politics, marking the emergence of a new era of partisan politics and intense media scrutiny.

Learn more about 1884 election: https://brainly.com/question/28114319

#SPJ11

The Puerto Revolutionary Committee created the island nation's flag in the 19th century, basing it on the Cuban flag and using inverted colors.

It was formally chosen as the country's flag when Puerto Rico joined the Commonwealth on July 25, 1952. Five alternating red and white lines make up the Puerto Rican flag. One white five-pointed star lying inside a blue triangle is displayed to the left of the flag. This explains the symbology.

Another referendum on the subject will be held in October, and Puerto Rico is hoping for a higher turnout. The official American flag would alter if Puerto Rico were to be made a state, among other things. According to Slate, US federal law stipulates that whenever a new state enters the union, an additional star must be added.

To know more about the Cuban flag visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29767942

#SPJ4

If an item has been patented but has not been marked as patented and infringement occurs, the patent holder is generally barred from collecting damages. Given statement are true.

What is patent infringement?

Violation of a patent owner's rights in relation to an invention Unless authorized by the patent owner, making, using, offering to sell, or selling something that contains every element of a patented claim or its equivalent while the patent is in effect constitutes patent infringement.

Making, using, selling, trying to sell, or importing something without obtaining a license from the patent holder is considered direct patent infringement.

What are the types of infringement patent?

Learn more about  infringement patent  to visit this link

https://brainly.com/question/4096076

#SPJ4

According to the deterrence argument, the purpose of legal punishment is to prevent future crimes by discouraging potential offenders from engaging in unlawful activities. This is achieved through two primary mechanisms: specific deterrence and general deterrence.

Specific deterrence targets the individual offender by imposing penalties that discourage them from repeating their criminal behavior. For example, when an individual is sentenced to prison for a crime, the punishment serves as a deterrent by making them aware of the consequences of their actions and preventing them from committing the same offense in the future.

General deterrence, on the other hand, aims to deter potential offenders in the wider community from engaging in criminal activities. By publicly imposing legal punishment on convicted offenders, the criminal justice system sends a message to society about the consequences of breaking the law, thus discouraging others from committing similar offenses.

The deterrence argument is based on the assumption that individuals are rational beings who weigh the costs and benefits of their actions. As such, legal punishment serves as a powerful disincentive for criminal behavior, as potential offenders are likely to perceive the negative consequences of their actions as outweighing any potential benefits. In this way, the deterrence argument posits that legal punishment helps maintain social order by reducing the prevalence of crime.

For more about primary mechanisms

https://brainly.com/question/10583168

#SPJ11

Answer: B is the correct answer

Explanation: I took the quiz and got it right. Plessy vs. Ferguson helped the united states allow segregation calling it constatuitional.

These moments include one that is particularly ironic. Claudius is praying in Act 3, and Hamlet has a wonderful opportunity to get retribution. But he chooses to wait till later. He worries that by killing Claudius while he was praying, he might send him to paradise.

Act 3 Scene 3 of William Shakespeare's play "Hamlet" fulfills a number of crucial functions. This sequence serves to disclose significant story twists and developments, among other things. For instance, Claudius tells Polonius about his intention to transfer Hamlet to England at the start of the action.

This information triggers a chain of occurrences that will have substantial ramifications for the play's characters.

Act 3 the play's action pivots in Scene 3, which also denotes a dramatic change in the narrative's course. Before this moment, Hamlet had been unable to act on his desire for vengeance against Claudius due to his lack of decision-making.

To learn more about Hamlet

https://brainly.com/question/3386851

#SPJ4

The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of over 60 sworn officers.

The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) has 64 sworn police officers who are joined by 40 full-time civilian department members. Together they try to maintain campus safety through crime prevention and education programs. They are also responsible in maintaining law and order.

The University of California Police Department or UCPD shares a partnership with the CARE. It is Campus Assault Resources and Education program. CARE is a safe place for survivors of sexual assault and help in maintaining discipline in the university. It also promotes safety awareness about recent activities through community outreach programs.

To know more about University of California here

https://brainly.com/question/16551247

#SPJ1

what does this mean?

Answer:

huh?

Explanation:

huh?????????????????????

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?

The correct option is B ;  Buying a house is an investment that pays off in the long run  is renting an apartment usually cheaper than buying a house

In reality, renting is often cheaper than buying a house due to several factors such as property taxes, maintenance costs, and insurance. Homeowners are responsible for property taxes, which can be a significant expense, while renters are generally not burdened with this cost. Additionally, maintenance and repair expenses are typically the responsibility of the landlord in rental properties, whereas homeowners have to cover these costs themselves. Homeowners also need to consider insurance payments, which can be higher than renters' insurance premiums. These factors contribute to the overall affordability of renting compared to buying a house.

Learn more about investment

https://brainly.com/question/15105766

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

No, because the appellate court must give due regard to the trial judge's opportunity to determine witness credibility.

Explanation:

Appellate courts or appeal courts are those that are empowered to review judgements that have been given at trial by lower courts.

Appeal courts exist at the state and federal level and they do not use a jury to review judgements.

In the given instance the construction contractor and home owner did not disagree on the findings of the trial judge and never issued a written opinion.

The appeal court is not likely to overturn the findings because they must give due regard to the trial judge's opportunity to determine witness credibility.

The trial judge should give a written opinion on the matter before the appeal court can delibrate

Answer:

The Supreme Court is the highest court of all the land. There is much discretion, involving a lengthy process for a case to be accepted within this prestigious Court. Much like the President vetoing or accepting a bill to become a law. You see, the Supreme Court determines to hear a case through a unison of votes from at least four Justices. This vote is known as the "Rule of Four". They will review everything from the case's background to how well the case would withstand during the trial. In order to do so, they read the petition for certiorari. Before doing any of this, however, you will need to, of course, file a lawsuit within your district. I wish you luck if you are attempting to bring your case to the supremacy.

The answer is D. ruling revenue procedure. Ruling revenue procedures have the highest authoritative weight as they are issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and carry the force of law.

Legislative regulations are also authoritative but they are not issued by the IRS. Private letters and action on decision do not carry authoritative weight as they are not public rulings. Additionally, revenue is the income generated by a company or government from its normal business activities.  Legislative regulation Legislative regulations have the highest authoritative weight among the given choices because they are issued by a government agency and have the force of law. These regulations help implement and interpret the statutes passed by the legislative branch, and they often provide guidance on revenue collection and management.

To know more about revenue, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16232387

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

While systemic reforms ultimately rely on government policies and action, individuals can play a role as well. Initiatives such as the Harvard Organization for Prison Education and Reform and the Petey Greene Program, for example, send trained volunteers to tutor incarcerated individuals with the dual goal of advocating for structural reforms to prison education. Volunteering to tutor students in prison who are working toward their GEDs will reap rewards for students, tutors, and society.

Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.

Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.

Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.

The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?

cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money

Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income

Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years

Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"

Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:

brainly.com/question/31749142

#SPJ4

tyy sm for the points

Answer:

tyy sm for the points

Explanation:

State employees demonstrate "values" as motorists by setting an example as a defensive driver. Defensive driving involves driving techniques that help drivers avoid accidents and respond to potential hazards while driving. Defensive driving is a fundamental value for all state employees, especially those who drive as part of their daily job.

State employees are required to follow all traffic rules and regulations while driving their vehicles.In addition, they are expected to be mindful of their surroundings and anticipate potential hazards on the road. This can be achieved by maintaining a safe following distance, keeping a lookout for other drivers, and adjusting speed to suit road and weather conditions.State employees also demonstrate "values" as motorists by arriving on time at the job site. Punctuality is another critical value for state employees, especially those who drive as part of their job. Being on time for a job not only reflects positively on the individual employee but also on the department as a whole.

Finally, by setting an example as a defensive driver, state employees demonstrate "values" as motorists. This means driving with caution and care, and by obeying all traffic laws and regulations. It also means promoting safe driving habits to other drivers and helping to prevent accidents on the road.In conclusion, state employees demonstrate "values" as motorists by setting an example as a defensive driver. They also demonstrate values by arriving on time at the job site and following all traffic rules and regulations while driving their vehicles.

To know more about defensive driver visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/13079666

#SPJ11

Gloria is only accountable for an intentional tort of battery if she hurled a rock that struck Merle with the purpose to damage or injure him. This is a "false," statement.

Unintentional accidents that cause harm to people, property, or finances are known as accidental torts.

An unintended tort occurs when the individual who caused the accident did so unintentionally and often as a result of their lack of caution.

If the defendant did not intend to hurt the plaintiff, they cannot be held accountable in an intentional tort case. When someone intends to injure one person but mistakenly harms another, intent may have been transferred.

In order to hold a defendant responsible for an intentional tort, the plaintiff must establish both that the defendant committed the act that resulted in the damages they are alleging as well as that the defendant acted with purpose or that he knew with a high degree of certainty that the action would have an unlawful outcome.

The result of a person's intention to conduct a certain activity, regardless of any harm or damages that may ensue, is intentional culpability.

In other words, someone may plan to do something but not necessarily intend it to be harmful.

Learn more about intentional tort plaintiffs below;

https://brainly.com/question/28605645

#SPJ5

Full Question:

If Gloria threw a rock that hit Merle, she is liable for an intentional tort of battery only if she intended to injure or harm Merle. (T/F)

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.