The new operating scenarios allow for polluters to obtain a general permit that covers a range of activities and can be tailored to meet the needs of their specific operations.
What is scenario?
A scenario is indeed a synoptical collage of the an action or sequence of actions and events in the performing arts. A play's plot was literally pinned to a back of the scenery in the commedia dell'arte as an outline of entrance points, exits, and action. The material from which the scenery was built is also known as canovaccio or "that which has been pinned to the canvas." Scenarios from of the Renaissance that have survived primarily consist of character names, succinct descriptions of events, and references to particular lazzi without any further explanation.
This approach allows for more efficient compliance with regulations and reduces the cost of obtaining permits. It also provides flexibility for companies to adjust their operations in response to changing environmental conditions.
To learn more about scenario
https://brainly.com/question/5408522
#SPJ4
*Do you believe a 14-17 year old should be charged as an adult and sent to prison?
Terms in this set (5)
Original
The United States Constitution is among the finest legal accomplishments in the history of the world. Which of the following influenced Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and the rest of the Founding Fathers?
a) English common-law principles
b) The Iroquois's system of federalism
c) Both A & B
d) None of the above
The United States Constitution is among the finest legal accomplishments in the history of the world. Which of the following influenced Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and the rest of the Founding Fathers - English common-law principles
English common-law concepts, which established a framework for the preservation of individual rights and liberties as well as the division of responsibilities among distinct departments of government, had a significant impact on the United States Constitution. The common law's tenets were well known to the founding fathers, especially Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin, who based the Constitution on them. The Iroquois' federalist system may have contributed to the creation of the American government, although it was predominantly shaped by English common-law ideas.
For such more question on Thomas Jefferson:
brainly.com/question/23384939
#SPJ4
law for admitting new states to the united states, territories govern themselves is called___
Northwest Ordinance is the statute governing the admission of new states to the union and the self-government of territories.
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union, but none may be formed or established within the jurisdiction of any other State, nor may any State be formed by the Junction of Two or More States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned.
Nothing in this Constitution shall be interpreted in a way that prejudges any claims of the United States or of any particular State. The Congress shall have the authority to dispose of and make all necessary rules and regulations regarding the Territory or other property belonging to the United States. Id. at 1665. View Art. II.
Learn more about territories Visit: brainly.com/question/29038837
#SPJ4
How is soft power defined?
Soft power in politics refers to the capacity to coax rather than force others to do something (contrast hard power). In other words, soft power entails influencing other people's preferences through attraction and appeal.
Who coined the word "soft power"?The phrase "soft power" which Nye, a former dean of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government first used in the late 1980s to describe a nation's capacity to influence others without using force or coercion, is now frequently used in discussions of foreign policy. In this brief work, the concept is reintroduced and its use in developing post-September 11 U.S. foreign policy is argued.
To know more about Soft power visit : https://brainly.com/question/25063559
#SPJ4
Who wrote men therefore in society having property, they have such a right to the goods, which by the law of the community are theirs, that nobody hath a right to take their substance or any part of it from them, without their own consent, without this they have no property at all
Answer:
John Locke
John Locke takes for granted the necessity of taxes, but stipulates three conditions for taxes and other government appropriations of property to be legitimate. The taxes cannot be so high that some individuals would be better off in the state of nature than as taxpayers within the nation.
Explanation:
mark me as brainliest thank you
Answer:
John Locke
Explanation:
what is the difference in statutory law and constitutional law?
Answer:
Explanation:
Statutory law and constitutional law are both important sources of law, but they have different origins, purposes, and scopes. Here are the main differences between the two:
1. Statutory law is created by legislative bodies, such as Congress or state legislatures, and is written down in statutes or codes. Constitutional law, on the other hand, derives from the Constitution and other founding documents, such as the Bill of Rights.
2. Statutory law is designed to regulate specific activities or conduct within society, such as traffic laws, criminal laws, or environmental regulations. Constitutional law, in contrast, is focused on the fundamental principles and structures of government, such as the separation of powers, individual rights, and federalism.
3. Statutory law has a narrower scope than constitutional law, as it only applies to the specific subject matter it regulates. Constitutional law, in contrast, applies to the entire system of government and has broad implications for individual rights and liberties.
4. Statutory law can be easily amended or repealed by the legislative body that created it, whereas constitutional law is much more difficult to change, as it requires the approval of a supermajority of lawmakers or a constitutional convention.
5. Statutory law is generally interpreted by the courts to determine its meaning and scope, but constitutional law is often interpreted by the Supreme Court or other high courts to establish its meaning and application.
In summary, statutory law and constitutional law serve different purposes and have different origins, scopes, amendment processes, and methods of interpretation. While statutory law regulates specific activities and conduct within society, constitutional law provides the foundational principles and structures of government and protects individual rights and liberties.
lab 14-1 which rule of the federal rules of civil procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports?
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports.
The rule states that an expert witness must provide a written report detailing the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify. The report must include a complete statement of all the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify, the reasons for the opinions, any exhibits to be used as evidence, and the qualifications of the witness.
The report must be provided at least 90 days before the trial date, and the expert must be available for deposition prior to trial. The expert's report must be signed, dated, and served on all parties in the case.
To know more about Federal , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14858877
#SPJ4
Why might it be difficult to prosecute a citizen who violates its laws outside its borders, when the offence is not illegal in the country he or she is visiting?
Answer:
Anyone who commits a crime outside their country will be punished according to the local law of the receiving country. This has happened before for other Americans, some of whom made international headlines because of the crimes they were accused of. I think
Explanation:
the first attempts to collect data on crime internationally occurred
The first attempts to collect data on crime internationally occurred in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
In 1885, the International Prison Congress was held in London, where delegates from various countries gathered to discuss the standardization of crime statistics. This led to the creation of the International Criminal Police Commission (ICPC) in 1923, which later became known as Interpol. The ICPC aimed to facilitate international cooperation in combating crime and gathering information on criminal activities across borders. However, the collection and standardization of crime data faced several challenges due to differences in legal systems, cultural norms, and varying definitions of crime across countries. Despite these challenges, efforts to gather and compare international crime data have continued to evolve over time and have become an important tool for policymakers and law enforcement agencies in understanding and addressing crime trends.
To learn more about crime, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30160621
#SPJ11
1.
Which of the following is an example of academic integrity?
A. You work on each assignment mostly by yourself.
B. You don't copy work or allow others to copy your work.
C. You look up answers on the internet without citing the source.
D. You work with close friends on assignments without instructor approval.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Academic integrity is to do your schoolwork completely by yourself, no plagiarizing which is when you copy your work from someone else, no one plagiarizing off you because those are examples of academic dishonesty. Which means your answer is option B or "You don't copy work or allow others to copy your work." It's not options A, C, and D because these are all examples of academic dishonestly, working on an assignment MOSTLY by yourself means you are still getting assistance from someone to help you with your work. Looking up the answers and working with close friends on your assignments are again academic dishonestly since you aren't completing your work by yourself.
Hope this helps.
discuss the centrility of law to a stable society or social order
Explanation:
Laws provide a framework and rules to help resolve disputes between individuals.
Laws create a system where individuals can bring their disputes before an impartial fact-finder, such as a judge or jury.
No country can maintain a rule of law society if its people do not respect the laws.
Everyone must make a commitment to respect laws, legal authorities, legal signage and signals, and courts.
The rule of law functions because most of us agree that it is important to follow laws every day.
What are the four steps, in order, of active crime response
Answer:
Introduce yourself to victims by name and title. Briefly explain your role and purpose.
Reassure victims of their safety and your concern by paying close attention to your own words, posture, mannerisms, and tone of voice. Say to victims, “You're safe now” or “I'm here now.” Use body language to show concern, such as nodding your head, using natural eye contact, placing yourself at the victim's level rather than standing over seated victims, keeping an open stance rather than crossing your arms, and speaking in a calm, sympathetic voice.
Ask victims to tell you in just a sentence or two what happened. Ask if they have any physical injuries. Take care of their medical needs first.
Offer to contact a family member, friend, or crisis counselor for victims.
Ensure privacy during your interview. Conduct it in a place where victims feel secure.
Ask simple questions that allow victims to make decisions, assert themselves, and regain control over their lives. Examples: “Would you like anything to drink?”; “May I come inside and talk with you?”; and “How would you like me to address you, Ms. Jones?”
Assure victims of the confidentiality of their comments whenever possible.
Ask victims about any special concerns or needs they may have.
Provide a “safety net” for victims before leaving them. Make telephone calls and pull together personal or professional support for the victims. Give victims a pamphlet listing resources available for help or information. This pamphlet should include contact information for local crisis intervention centers and support groups; the prosecutor's office and the victim-witness assistance office; the State victim compensation/assistance office; and other nationwide services, including toll-free hotlines.
Give victim's—in writing—your name and information on how to reach you. Encourage them to contact you if they have any questions or if you can be of further help.
Explanation:
Administrative law applies to operations of businesses.
True/False
the development of the juvenile justice system was not initially concerned with what?
Human beings are the only animal accountable before the law discuss in critical thinking apparoach
Answer: The question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and contested issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While it is true that humans are the only species that are legally accountable for their actions, the reasons for this are not necessarily clear-cut, and raise important ethical and philosophical questions.
One argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans possess a unique capacity for moral reasoning and decision-making that other animals lack. This capacity allows humans to understand the consequences of their actions and make choices based on ethical principles, which is a key factor in determining legal accountability. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which non-human animals are capable of moral reasoning, and whether their actions should be judged by the same standards as human actions.
Another argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans have created complex legal systems that are designed to regulate and enforce social norms. These legal systems are based on the principle of individual responsibility, which holds that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and the consequences that result. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which legal systems are designed to reflect universal ethical principles, and whether they are biased in favor of human interests.
Ultimately, the question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While there are certainly arguments in favor of human exceptionalism, there are also important ethical and philosophical questions that need to be considered. It is important to engage in a rigorous and thoughtful analysis of these issues in order to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.
Liam has a history of gang involvement and is facing charges on drug trafficking. When he was arrested, Liam was in the middle of a fight with one of his drug suppliers. He is known in the neighborhood to carry a weapon. When the judge decides that Liam will stand trial for his charges, what will she MOST likely do at this stage
Answer:
She will detain Liam in jail until the trial date
Explanation:
Took the quiz and got it right
There must be two essential elements for there to be a criminal violation, which is activity against the law that can be labeled as criminal and subject to judicial punishment: Hence she detained him and order him to be in Jail till next trial.
What is Criminal procedure ?On the one hand, there must be criminal intent, which is the desire to commit a crime and the physical activity intended to further that want. For instance, to commit robbery, there must be the desire to steal and a series of mobilizations of physical items intended to further such desire (threats, struggles, etc.).
On the other hand, there must be criminal behavior, which means that the behavior committed with the intent to commit a crime is likely to result in the intended criminal outcome execute the necessary steps to achieve that. For there to be a criminal violation, which is action against the law that can be classified as criminal and susceptible to judicial penalty, there must be two prerequisites:
On the one hand, there needs to be criminal intent, which is the desire to do something wrong and the actual action meant to fulfill that desire.
Learn more about Criminal Procedure here
https://brainly.com/question/9336457
# SPJ 5
the following are examples of limited jurisdiction trial courts except: group of answer choices appellate court family court traffic court probate court
The appellate court is not an example of limited jurisdiction trial courts
Appellate courts hear and assess appeals in the American legal system. Appellate courts review the procedures and decisions made by the trial court to ensure that they are fair and that the correct law was applied. It is not an illustration of a trial court with restricted jurisdiction. In matters that have been appealed from lower courts, an appellate court instead evaluates the legal questions and arguments raised in written briefs and during oral arguments rather than conducting trials or hearing evidence.
The other three given options namely family court, traffic court, and probate court are all examples of limited jurisdiction trial courts, which are tribunals with the power to hear and decide issues pertaining to a specific area of law or subject matter.
Read more about the Appellate court on:
https://brainly.com/question/11744340
#SPJ4
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
A cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in your bank in Italy. What documents would you require him to do it? Imagine that the trader explains his business in detail, and he says that he buys cryptocurrency online and sells them for more money to make a profit. He has financial statements; ha pays taxes and has all of this in the rule. Do you think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes? Would you open the account to him?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
If a cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in my bank in Italy, I would be very strict in order to proceed with his request. I would double-check the present legislation in Italy regarding Anti-money Laundering and all the laws regarding international finance and banking transactions. And do not want to have any problems with the law.
The documents I would require him to provide are the legal constitution of his company in a real country, not in the so-called "fiscal paradises" such as Andorra. He would have to provide me with all the documents that prove he runs a legal business and I would take these documents to the legal department of the bank to prove and certify them.
I would also ask my assistant to personally check on the web or public criminal records to know if the ma's company has had any problems in the past that had affected his reputation.
I would ask him to explain his business in detail, with the presence of an expert in the cryptocurrency business. I would require a copy of the company's financial statements, his taxes, and proof that he has no debt. He needs to prove that all the documents are in perfect rule.
Yes, I think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes because that is the nature of the cryptocurrency business. It has not been regulated by any government in the world. That is the reason why almost no bank in the world or country accepts cryptocurrency as normal currency. It is so volatile. Indeed, nobody regulates cryptocurrency. And the proof is the thew bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies change their value on a daily basis.
I would think twice about accepting opening the account to hi, It is risky to the first degree.
I have a friend who saw an advertisement for a van, which she
thought would be good to use for business as this would make it easier for her to reach people in local villages during the week. The van was being advertised by Ben, so She contacted him to ask if he could also service the van for the same price as she wanted to be sure that it would work for her o Monday. He assured her that the service can be done over the weekend. He told her that he could get the servicing done on the Sat. Ben didn't finish for sat. Based on the extra agreement she pay the price of the van provided that the van would be ready for Saturday at noon but instead, it was ready by Wednesday. so she lost a profit of $1500, she had to cancel a special order for a local cycling club that trades exclusively with her company on Tuesday, which means she lost a further $3000 profit. what should be my legal advice to her in this instance, if there is a contract between Rita and Ben?
What is infanticide
Infanticide, the killing of the newborn. It has often been interpreted as a primitive method of birth control and a means of ridding a group of its weak and deformed children; but most societies actively desire children and put them to death (or allow them to die) only under exceptional circumstances.\
Have a nice day ✨penalties for unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of federal records or the attempt to do so, include a fine, imprisonment, or both. t or f
Federal records removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction that is unauthorised or unintentional, as well as the attempt to do so, are punishable by penalties, incarceration, or both. Hence, the given statement is true.
Due to their penal nature, penalties in English law are contractual clauses that are not enforceable in court. Since at least 1720, it has been recognised under English contract law that if a clause in a contract creates a punishment, the parties cannot enforce that clause.
But throughout time, the criteria for determining what counts as a penalty have changed. Without any general statutory intervention, the common law judges of England have totally evolved the law relating to contractual penalties.
However, in addition to the common law standards concerning penalties, there are regulations that specifically address how onerous clauses should be avoided.
Therefore, the given statement is true.
Learn more about penalties from here:
https://brainly.com/question/5532451
#SPJ4
Provide an example of a South African law that you find unjust and which you would like to change,how would you change it?
Answer:
Explanation:
I think, first we have to understand that justice means different things to different people. Justice is a matter of perspective. A ruling that would seem as though one party has been robbed, would actually mean that justice has been served to the other party. That being said, I think these laws are unjust. And I must strongly say, from my own perspective.
Racial categorization remains very active in there, of course we all know how distasteful that is.
Foreigners are penalized indiscriminately, there is no regard for how much they may or may not have contributed to apartheid as individuals
folkways are blank multiple choice norms governing everyday social behavior, the violation of which raises comparatively little concern. made by a government for a society, interpreted by the courts, and backed by the power of the state. deemed highly necessary to the welfare of a society. norms that are written down and specify strict punishment for violators.
Folkways are informal norms guiding everyday social behavior with minor consequences for violation, while rules are formal norms backed by authority and carry more serious consequences when violated.
Folkways are the customary behaviors, social practices, and norms that develop within a specific cultural or social group. They are the traditional, everyday habits, customs, and expectations that guide social interactions and behavior. Folkways are norms governing everyday social behavior, the violation of which raises comparatively little concern. This means that these norms are not considered serious and there are no strict punishments for their violation. They are simply customs that are followed by a particular society.
Laws are deemed highly necessary to the welfare of a society, and they are written down and specify strict punishment for violators.
Read more about folkways here:
https://brainly.com/question/9044207
#SPJ11
experts continue to debate whether higher education makes an officer better at the job or whether vocational experience is all that is necessary.
True - experts continue to debate whether higher education makes an officer better at the job or whether the vocational experience is all that is necessary.
Debate is a process that involves formal discourse on a selected subject matter, often inclusive of a moderator and audience. In a debate, arguments are put forward for frequently opposing viewpoints. Debates have traditionally happened in public conferences, instructional establishments, debate halls, coffeehouses, competitions, and legislative assemblies.[1] Debate has also been conducted for academic and leisure purposes,[2] usually related to academic institutions and debating societies.[3] those debates placed an emphasis upon logical consistency, factual accuracy, and emotional enchantment to an audience. contemporary types of aggressive debate additionally encompass rules for individuals to speak about and decide upon the framework of the controversy (how the talk might be judged).
Learn more about debate here
https://brainly.com/question/2139588
#SPJ4
A man from India became the USA air force and there was a war between India and the USA & he need to attack his own country.
Is the man doing it correct or not {Attacking his own country - India,as He is the part of US AIRFORCE}
bicyclists may ride in the left lane if they are on a one-way street with two or more lanes.true false
Bicyclists may ride in the left lane if they are on a one-way street with two or more lanes. This statement is true.
Under Washington law, bicycles are regarded as "vehicles." Even when a bicycle lane is established, bicycles are permitted to travel on the road in Washington and the majority of other states.
The sole exception is when a road has specific bicycle-related restrictions. Unless turning, dodging an object, or riding in the middle or left of the lane is necessary for safety, cyclists must stay on the right side of the road.
Bicyclists are still allowed to use the road even though they may go slower than the posted speed limit. The road is evenly shared by motorists and bicyclists.
Both should alternate turns in accordance with right-of-way regulations. All vehicles, including bicycles, must abide by these regulations.
To know more about bicyclist rules:
https://brainly.com/question/2519820
#SPJ4
During a murder trial, the judge dismissed some of the evidence from the crime scene as invalid. Which reasons could possibly justify this dismissal?
A.
suspect’s DNA on the object
B.
victim’s fingerprint on the object
C.
police fingerprints on the object
D.
victim’s DNA on the object
Answer:
Answer is C
Explanation:
I took the test
Ethics has to do with what my feelings tell me is right or wrong?
Answer:::: True.
Explain your answer:
The Executive Branch states that the Governor of Texas is elected every 4 years
at the same time as the President of the United States. *
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation: