Certificates of marriage, baptism, and similar ceremonies under Rule 803(12) pertain to certain documents and records that can be used as evidence in legal proceedings.
Rule 803(12) is a part of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which govern the admissibility of evidence in U.S. federal courts. This rule deals specifically with the "Ancient Documents" exception to the hearsay rule. Under Rule 803(12), certificates of marriage, baptism, and similar ceremonies are considered reliable and trustworthy documents that can be admitted as evidence, despite being hearsay.
Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted and is generally not admissible as evidence due to concerns about its reliability. However, ancient documents are an exception to this rule because they are presumed to be accurate and reliable due to their age and the nature of the information they contain.
Certificates of marriage, baptism, and similar ceremonies typically include information about important life events, such as the names of the individuals involved, the date and location of the event, and the person who officiated the ceremony. These documents are often considered public records and can be used to establish various legal matters, such as proving identity, relationships, and dates of important events.
know more about baptism here:
https://brainly.com/question/30749820
#SPJ11
Which of the following national holidays does not occur in the winter?
Many national holidays do not occur in the winter in the United States. One national holiday that does not occur in winter is "Memorial Day, which falls between May 25–31."
Other national holidays that do not occur in winter in the United States include the following:
Juneteenth National Independence Day on June 19th;Independence Day on July 4th;Labor Day on September 1 to 7th;Columbus Day, on October 8th to 14th;Veterans Day on November 11th;Thanks Giving Day on November 22 - 24;This is based on the fact that Winter occurs in the United States between December 21s to March 20th.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that various national holidays do not fall within the winter period.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/16406621
Explain the ceremonial and real executive functions of the president in the presidential system of government
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The ceremonial and real executive functions of the president in the presidential system of government are:
The ceremonial role of the President in a Presidential system of government includes or involves actions like opening of new session of national ceremonies like independence day celebration, welcoming visiting Head of States from other countries, and receiving Credentials of foreign Ambassadors into the country.
It also involves acting as Patron of many non-partisan organization specifically that of international organization.
The real executive function of a President in a presidential system of government are:
1. President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by legislative.
2. President is also responsible in appointing Ministers, subject to legislative approval and heads of federal commission.
3. President is also responsible or has the power to sign legislation into law or to veto bills enacted by the legislative.
4. President also has power to give pardons and clemencies for criminal of Federal crimes.
Answer:
Ceremonial functions of a President is only exercised in the case of an emergency such as a coup d’etat or government breakdown. This is because the Presidents who perform ceremonial functions are known as Head of States and not Head of Governments. This is common in countries with a monarchical origin and the monarchs are referred to as the Head of States.
The real executive functions of a President which is the Head of Government in this case include supervision and control of the executive arm of government, preparation of executive budgets to sent to the Congress and implementation of policies and programs.
TRUE OR FALSE while no policy can stop wrongdoers, it can establish boundaries for acceptable and unacceptable behavior and enable management to punish violators.
This statement- "while no policy can stop wrongdoers, it can establish boundaries for acceptable and unacceptable behavior and enable management to punish violators" is TRUE.
While there is no such policy that can guarantee that wrongdoers will not engage in any unacceptable behavior, policies usually establishes the clear boundaries for what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behavior. It helps to create a very clear understanding of what is expected and also provides a framework for managing and punishing all those who violate the rules.
After having well-defined policies you can also reduce the likelihood of wrongdoing by yourself establishing a culture of accountability and transparency.
However, it's very important to note here that policies alone are not enough to prevent any wrongdoers, and effective enforcement and oversight mechanisms are also very necessary.
To know more about wrongdoer refer to-
brainly.com/question/7008449#
#SPJ4
A. What is the problem that the city council will be trying to address with
the proposed ordinance?
B. What is the legislative intent of the city council in drafting the ordinance?
C. List all the details you think should be included in the proposed ordinance.
D. Draft four sentences that you think would make a good ordinance to
deal with the problem.
E. Role-play a legislative committee meeting at which the members have
worked on four-sentence versions of the proposed ordinance and are
trying to agree on a final version.
F. After the four-sentence law is drafted, use the guidelines for drafting
laws on page 22 to analyze possible problems with the law as drafted.
Are there problems? If so, what are they, and how can they be solved?
Two public meetings are typically held by a city, town, or county, one in front of the plan commission and the other in front of the city or county legislature.
What is commission?A commission is a payment made by a broker or investment advisor in return for managing a client's purchases and sales of securities or providing investment advice. Commissions and fees differ greatly from one another, at least in the context of expert advisors in the financial services industry. The primary source of income for commission-based advisors and brokers is the sale of financial products like mutual funds and annuities, as well as the management of client funds. A fee-based advisor incurs a set cost when managing a client's funds. A monetary amount or a percentage of the assets being managed could be used here (AUM). The majority of family sales are uncompensated gifts of land.
To learn more about commission, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29564439
#SPJ1
Mumbi is approximately 845 kilometers away from Bangalore, and Mumbai is approximately 1160 km away from Delhi. The distances, measured in centimeters between cities on Allyson’s map are proportional to the real distances.Which of the following could be the the distances on Allyson’s map?Choose 3 answersa) Bangalore to Mumbai: 116.5 cmMumbai to Delhi: 174 cmb) Bangalore to Mumbai: 42.25Mumbai to Delhi: 58 cmc) Bangalore to Mumbai: 23.4 cmMumbai to Delhi: 29 cmd) Bangalore to Mumbai: 16.9 cmMumbai to Delhi: 23.2 cme) Bangalore to Mumbai: 25.35 cmMumbai to Delhi: 34.8cm
The three possible choices are b), d), and e), The distances on Allyson's map are proportional to the real distances between cities. Therefore, we need to find three answer choices that are in proportion to the actual distances given.
We can start by finding the ratio of the actual distances and see if they match any of the ratios in the answer choices.
The ratio of the actual distance between Bangalore and Mumbai (845 km) to the actual distance between Mumbai and Delhi (1160 km) is approximately 0.728. Let's see if any of the answer choices have this same ratio.
a) The ratio 116.5 / 174 = 0.669540 (Not equal to 0.728448) , not a match.
b) The ratio 42.25 / 58 = 0.728448 is approximately 0.728, a match!
c) The ratio 23.4 / 29 = 0.806897 is approximately 0.805, not a match.
d) The ratio 16.9 / 23.2 is approximately 0.729, a match!
e) The ratio is 25.35 / 34.8 = 0.728448 approximately 0.729, a match!
Therefore, the three possible choices are b), d), and e), as they all have ratios that match the actual distances given.
To know more about Proportion visit-
brainly.com/question/30657439
#SPJ11
Test strips are most often used for _____.
Answer: to test the drug content in the blood
Explanation:Option C
Question
Refer to the article “The Future of Money” in your Money, Money, Money magazine for a complete version of this text.
How does the author best support the point that there are advantages to using digital currency?
Drag the correct answer into the box.
by describing ways that it can be safer and easier to use than traditional money
by giving opinions about benefits of using cryptocurrency and problems with using cash and credit
by explaining that digital transactions are fastest because they are handled by computers
The author supports the point by giving opinions on the benefits of using cryptocurrencies and problems with using cash and credit.
What Is Digital Currency?
Digital currency is only available in digital form. It isn't a material object with a physical actuality, unlike plutocrat or other goods like gold or oil painting. By streamlining the current fiscal system, digital plutocrat can grease briskly and more affordable fiscal deals. It may also make it simpler for central banks to apply financial policy.
Cryptocurrencies, digital currencies issued by central banks, and stablecoins are exemplifications of different types of digital plutocrat.
The amicable asset transfer and implicit reduction in sale costs are some benefits of digital currencies.
Digital currencies have some downsides, including the fact that they can be unpredictable to trade and are vulnerable to hacking.
To learn more on Digital currency from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28963893
#SPJ1
shield laws protect journalists' right to refuse to testify against their sources while gathering information in their role as journalists. there is no shield law at the federal level. question which of the following states has the greatest protection for freedom of the press based on the information on the map?
I cannot see the map you are referring to. However, if we assume that the map shows the existence and strength of shield laws in different states, then the state with the strongest protection for freedom of the press would be the one with the most robust and comprehensive shield laws.
In general, there is variation in the strength of shield laws across different states. Some states have strong and broad protections, while others have more limited or weaker protections. States with strong shield laws include California, Oregon, and New York, while states with weaker or no shield laws include Wyoming, North Dakota, and Alabama. However, it's important to note that the strength of shield laws is just one factor that can affect the overall freedom of the press in a given state or country. Other factors, such as government censorship, media ownership, and public attitudes towards the press, can also play a significant role.
Learn more about strength here:
https://brainly.com/question/9367718
#SPJ11
which of the following is true of the doctrine of res judicata? group of answer choices it bars subsequent civil law actions involving the same parties, claims, demands or causes of action. it bars a person from being tried twice for the same offense under criminal and civil law. it states that a federal and state prosecutors cannot cooperate to secure a single conviction. it prevents a person from being tried for the same crime in federal and state court.
The true statement of the doctrine of res judicata is: it bars subsequent civil law actions involving the same parties, claims, demands or causes of action. The Option A is correct.
What does the doctrine of res judicata provides?Res judicata is a case in which there has been a final judgment and that is no longer subject to appeal; and the legal doctrine meant to bar (or preclude) relitigation of an assertion between the same parties.
The doctrine of res judicata is a method of preventing injustice to the parties of a supposedly completed case, but it is also, if not primarily, a method of avoiding unnecessary waste of judicial resources. Res judicata prevents litigants from not only contradicting earlier judgments, but also from multiplying judgments and causing confusion.
Read more about res judicata
brainly.com/question/8076734
#SPJ1
According to results from the Monitoring the Future survey, when did drug use among young Americans reach its highest level?
Answer:
1970s
[insert text bc Brainly wants at least 20 characters to “explain my answer well.”]
what were the details of stacy willingham’s statements during the trial?
Other witnesses before Willingham's trial gave differing reports of Willingham's actions following the fire, but their testimonies did not constitute proof that a crime was committed. Willingham was a nasty man and a sociopath, thus his guilt was affected by the flawed forensic analysis and dearth of other information.
The charge against Cameron was murder, not family abuse. There have been discrepancies in Willingham's statements on the fire. • Over the course of 10 years and despite extensive questioning, Willingham's comments to law enforcement personnel were astonishingly constant. The Willingham Case.
On many various levels, the story of Cameron Barton Willingham elicits powerful feelings, but some of those who support his convictions and punishment are distorting the truth.
To know more about Willingham's click here
brainly.com/question/29853190
#SPJ4
This purpose of joint operations is to defend national interests, not only in conflict but throughpreventative measures to deter potential adversaries who could threaten the vital interests of theU.S. or its partners.
Project power despite anti-access/area denial challenges
Deter and defeat aggression
Maintain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent
The purpose of joint operations is to defend national interests, not only in conflict but through preventative measures to deter and defeat aggression that could threaten the vital interests of the U.S. or its partners. Therefore, the correct answer is the second option.
Joint operations are military operations in which two or more armed services from a single country participate. The aim of joint operations is to accomplish a specific objective while using the strengths and advantages of each service in a synergistic way. Joint operations usually include the planning and execution of strategies and tactics, as well as the management of resources across military departments to achieve a common objective.
The primary goal of joint operations is to defend national interests, not only in conflict but also through preventative measures to deter potential adversaries who could threaten the vital interests of the U.S. or its partners.
Learn more about joint operation at https://brainly.com/question/28192725
#SPJ11
If you accidently take someone's jacket, believing that it is your own, it is still larceny.
False
True
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because a jacket is a person property, Similar to theft, larceny is the taking of property with the intent of depriving the owner of its use. Petty or simple larceny is usually a misdemeanor and involves theft of property less than the local threshold for grand larceny, while grand larceny is typically a felony. Examples are thefts of bicycles, thefts of motor vehicle parts and accessories, shoplifting, pocket-picking. So therefore taking someone's jacket believing is your own is still larceny.
Explain why the Executive office of the President is important to the President of the United States?
Answer:
The EOP has responsibility for tasks ranging from communicating the President's message to the American people to promoting our trade interests abroad. Overseen by the White House Chief of Staff, the EOP has traditionally been home to many of the President's closest advisors.
Explanation:
The EOP is in charge of everything from informing the American people about the President's message to advancing our trade interests abroad. Many of the President's closest advisors have historically called the EOP, which is overseen by the White House Chief of Staff, home.
The President of the United States, who also serves as head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces, is given control over the Executive Branch. The President picks the leaders of all government agencies, including the Cabinet, in order to carry out and enforce the laws passed by Congress. The Vice President is a member of the Executive Branch and is prepared to take over as President if necessary.
The daily enforcement and implementation of federal legislation is the responsibility of the Cabinet and independent federal agencies. These divisions and organizations have objectives that are as dissimilar from one another as the Department of Defense's and the Environmental Protection Agency's, the Social Security Administration's, and the Securities and Exchange Commission's, are.
Therefore, the Executive Office of the President is important to the President of the United States.
Learn more about President, here;
https://brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ6
A grand jury is in charge of determining whether there is enough evidence to move forward with the charge- 9 out of 12 grand jury members must agree that the process can move forward. If this occurs it is knows as a "true bill" (indictment), if not it is known as a "No bill."
Yes, you have provided an accurate description of the role and decision-making process of a grand jury.
Decision-making is the process of selecting a course of action among various alternatives based on a set of criteria or objectives. It involves assessing information, evaluating potential outcomes, and choosing the best option that aligns with one's goals and values. Decision-making can be influenced by factors such as personal preferences, available resources, past experiences, and the perceived risks and benefits associated with each choice.
Effective decision-making requires critical thinking, analytical skills, and the ability to weigh pros and cons. It involves gathering relevant data, considering different perspectives, and anticipating potential consequences. Decision-making can be a complex and iterative process, involving both rational and intuitive elements. It plays a crucial role in personal life, business, and various other domains, as it directly impacts outcomes and shapes the trajectory of individual and organizational success.
To know more about Decision-making refer to-
brainly.com/question/30697303
#SPJ4
Help me please I need to pass
Taken together, the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Commerce Clause, provides justification for:
Taken together, the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Commerce Clause provide justification for the expansion of federal powers and the regulation of various aspects of interstate commerce.
The Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, grants Congress the authority to make laws that are necessary and proper to carry out its enumerated powers as outlined in the U.S. Constitution. This clause has been interpreted to allow Congress to exercise implied powers beyond those explicitly stated in the Constitution.
The Commerce Clause, found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution, grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. This clause has been broadly interpreted to include not only the regulation of the actual buying and selling of goods but also the regulation of economic activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
The combination of these two clauses has provided a legal basis for the federal government to regulate a wide range of activities, including but not limited to:
Regulating interstate trade and commerce: The federal government has the authority to regulate trade and commerce that occurs across state lines, ensuring a level playing field and preventing barriers to commerce between states.
Enacting laws related to economic activities: Congress can pass laws that are deemed necessary and proper to regulate various economic activities, even if they do not explicitly fall under its enumerated powers. This includes areas such as banking, taxation, labor, and environmental regulations that have an impact on interstate commerce.
Establishing federal agencies and programs: The Necessary and Proper Clause has allowed Congress to create federal agencies and programs to carry out its regulatory and oversight functions, ensuring uniformity and consistency in areas that affect interstate commerce.
Addressing national economic crises: During times of economic crises or emergencies, the federal government can exercise its authority under these clauses to take necessary actions to stabilize the economy and protect interstate commerce.
It's important to note that the interpretation and application of these clauses have been subject to various legal debates and court rulings throughout history, shaping the extent and boundaries of federal power in regulating interstate commerce.
To know more about Commerce. here
https://brainly.com/question/29115983
#SPJ11
An attorney in one state represented a plaintiff for personal injuries sustained due to the negligence of the defendant, which occurred on January 20. The statute of limitations for the plaintiff's cause of action is governed by the law of a different state. That statute of limitations is only three months. In other states, the statute of limitations for similar causes of action ranges from two years to five years; in the attorney's home state it is three years. The plaintiff first went to see the attorney on June 15, after the statute of limitations had expired. The attorney, based on his experience in other states, believed that the case was well within the statute of limitations. He drafted a complaint, signed it, and filed it in federal court on June 20. The case was immediately dismissed based on the fact that the statute of limitations had expired.
May the attorney be sanctioned?
a. No, because he did not know that the plaintiff's case was not warranted by existing law.
b. No, because he could have argued that the statute of limitations should be reversed.
c. Yes, because the attorney's signature makes him strictly liable for any defects in the complaint.
d. Yes, because he should have known that the plaintiff's case was not warranted by existing law.
It is important for attorneys to stay informed about the relevant laws in each jurisdiction where they practice to ensure they can provide competent representation to their clients. d. Yes, because he should have known that the plaintiff's case was not warranted by existing law.
Was the attorney's conduct regarding the statute of limitations in the plaintiff's case sufficient to warrant sanctions?The attorney in this scenario may be subject to sanctions. Despite being aware that the statute of limitations for the plaintiff's cause of action was three months, the attorney mistakenly believed the case was well within the statute of limitations based on his experience in other states.
However, the attorney had a professional responsibility to be knowledgeable about the applicable law in the jurisdiction where the case was filed. Failing to recognize that the statute of limitations had expired and filing a complaint after the deadline demonstrates a lack of due diligence on the attorney's part.
Sanctions in such cases aim to hold attorneys accountable for their professional conduct and maintain the integrity of the legal system. While the attorney may argue that he could have challenged the statute of limitations, his failure to file within the appropriate timeframe could still be deemed a violation of professional standards.
Learn more about: attorneys
brainly.com/question/17215189
#SPJ11
suppose a country suffers from a recession. identify the components of countercyclical fiscal policy
A country suffers from a recession Imagine a country that is going through a recession the discretionary and automatic components of countercyclical fiscal policy are illustrated in the following examples.
A fiscal strategy employed by the government to counteract boom or recession is known as a counter-cyclical fiscal policy. In an effort to bring the economy back into balance.
It works against the present boom or recession trend. Countercyclical fiscal policy functions naturally in two opposing directions during these two phases. Recessions are phases of the business cycle where demand is falling and economic growth is slowing. In this case, the government's responsibility is to increase demand by modifying its tax and spending policies. By creating demand, tax cuts and spending increases will assist to stimulate the economy.
Complete question:
suppose a country suffers from a recession. identify the components of countercyclical fiscal policy of the country.
To know more about Countercyclical fiscal policy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29485487
#SPJ4
Which legal school of thought is illustrated in this dialogue? DONUT DAY AT THE OFFICE Part 7 Alison: (She stands during David's speech as if inspired but sits down once Bob starts talking.) Bob: Right. Power to the people David. Anyone else hungry? (He tries to slowly move to the donuts and Joyce continues to defend them like a point guard.) Lee: I have an idea that might address all of these issues. What if none of us have any of these donuts but instead we break up into teams and sell them to our coworkers for a profit? Instead of getting one or two donuts, we can stop on our way home and pick up a dozen of them each with our profits. In this case, we ignore the company stick-in-the-mud book regulations because, as you can see, we are obviously presented with some opportunities for a little economic development. Corporate rules here must bow to economic opportunity. If we let our rules block our prosperity, what kind of company will we become? End Part 7 Command school of thought. Law and economics school of thought. Sociological school of thought. Legal realism school of thought.
Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
What if your state decided to implement a law that allowed everyone to be stopped at any time to determine if you were legal citizens of the United States?
Answer:
yeah
Explanation:
because people from other country fake their legal citizenship in the united states
PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! WILL MAKE YOU THE BRAINLIEST!!!
What is the solution to this problem in "Fish ‘Till U Drop vs. New Sense, In"?
Please read the handout and help!!!
Answer:
um so get together with the people who have the same number as you then rehearse the section the act it out so just use ur hands to talk and move a little
Explanation:
Which of the following individuals or groups can make laws? Select all that apply.
US. Congress
a state legislature
the Supreme Court
a high school principal
a neighborhood association
a the President of the United States
Answer:
state legislature the supreme court
4. Are state courts very busy? If so why
are
they?
Answer:
16
Explanation:
Dan is 16 years younger than Emily.
if you were the chairman of Nepal Disabled women Association what plan would you make for the Disabled women's welfare and make them independent? prepare a detail plan.
Answer:
1 :Provide vocational training to make them independent.
2:Give them support.
3:Conduct awareness programmes.
4: As a chairperson I will try as much as I can provide them their rights.
5: Provide decision makin power.
6: Leverage technology to develop skills.
7: Provide training to improve the required skills for independence.
8: Consider options for learning, employment or volunteering.
If your license is a must wear a correct of glass lenses you
Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.
Explanation:
Which of the following cases describes an agreement of ethics and laws?
A) A company outsourcing its jobs to a foreign country.
B) A person being penalized for bribing a judge to rule a case in the person's favor.
C) A company not spending more money to keep its emission rates below the legal standard.
D) A person hiring an illegal alien worker whose family is in destitute.
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Took the test
Question 3 of 10
Which of the following best explains the purpose of a demand schedule?
A. To calculate how much of a good consumers will use.
B. To show the level of demand at various prices.
C. To indicate how supply and demand relate to price.
O
D. To demonstrate how supply affects demand.
What major legislation encouraged thousands of immigrants to settle land in the western united states?.
The primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
What all acts were introduced to set the Western region of the US?It was said that the act was carried out or passed in order to promote economic progress and the expansion of the American West.
It should be noted that the Homestead Act of 1862, which Congress is said to have passed, granted 160 acres of federal land to anyone who would agree to farm the land.
Due to the 160 acres of land that the Homestead Act gave settlers, it is known to have promoted significant migration to the West.
The Homestead Act was therefore a key piece of legislation that encouraged numerous immigrants to buy land in the western United States.
Therefore, the primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
For more information on Homestead Act, refer to the following:
https://brainly.com/question/10390487
#SPJ4
florida public records law an unsolicited proposal is exempt for no longer than 90 days after the initial notice by the responsible public entity rejecting all proposals. if the responsible public entity does not issue a competitive solicitation for a qualifying project, the unsolicited proposal ceases to be exempt 180 days after receipt of the unsolicited proposal by such entity. True or False.
The statement is false.
Under Florida public records law, an unsolicited proposal can be exempt from disclosure for a limited period, but the specific timeframes mentioned in the statement are not accurate. Here's a breakdown of the correct provisions:
Exemption Period: An unsolicited proposal submitted to a responsible public entity can be exempt from public records disclosure for a period of 30 days after the date of the entity's receipt of the proposal. During this time, the entity evaluates the proposal's feasibility, utility, or potential for the public's interest.
Competitive Solicitation: If the responsible public entity decides not to initiate a competitive solicitation for the project described in the unsolicited proposal, the exemption can be extended for an additional period. The unsolicited proposal remains exempt for 90 days from the initial notice issued by the entity, which must reject all proposals. This additional exemption period allows the entity to explore the potential for competitive solicitation or alternative procurement methods.
It's important to note that after the exemption period expires, the unsolicited proposal becomes subject to public records disclosure unless other exemptions or protections apply.
To ensure accurate information regarding Florida's public records law and its specific provisions, it is advisable to consult the relevant statutes or consult legal professionals familiar with Florida law.
To know more about, unsolicited proposals click here:https://brainly.com/question/30053310
#SPJ11