Answer: No, lie spotters are armed with scientific knowledge of how to spot deception. They use it to get to the truth, and they do what mature leaders do everyday; they have difficult conversations with difficult people,
Explanation:NONE
Answer:
Liespotting reveals the sophisticated lie-detection methods of security experts and interrogators, and arms you with proven techniques to detect deception and build trust.
Gain a lasting advantage in business and dramatically improve your personal relationships by learning to decode the body language, facial expressions, words and actions of everyone you encounter.
penalties for unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of federal records or the attempt to do so, include a fine, imprisonment, or both. t or f
Federal records removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction that is unauthorised or unintentional, as well as the attempt to do so, are punishable by penalties, incarceration, or both. Hence, the given statement is true.
Due to their penal nature, penalties in English law are contractual clauses that are not enforceable in court. Since at least 1720, it has been recognised under English contract law that if a clause in a contract creates a punishment, the parties cannot enforce that clause.
But throughout time, the criteria for determining what counts as a penalty have changed. Without any general statutory intervention, the common law judges of England have totally evolved the law relating to contractual penalties.
However, in addition to the common law standards concerning penalties, there are regulations that specifically address how onerous clauses should be avoided.
Therefore, the given statement is true.
Learn more about penalties from here:
https://brainly.com/question/5532451
#SPJ4
It is a long-term holding facility for sentenced offenders. Estelle v. Gamble (1976) is to ______ as Wolff v. McDonnell (1974) is to ______.
It is a long-term holding facility for sentenced offenders. Estelle v. Gamble (1976) is to cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment, as Wolff v. McDonnell (1974) is to due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Estelle v. Gamble was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court ruled that deliberate indifference to the serious medical needs of prisoners constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. The case established the principle that prisons have an obligation to provide adequate medical care to inmates, and that failure to do so can be a violation of their constitutional rights.
Wolff v. McDonnell, on the other hand, was a case that addressed the due process rights of prisoners. The Supreme Court held that prisoners are entitled to certain procedural protections in disciplinary hearings, including the right to notice of the charges against them, the right to present evidence and witnesses, and the right to a written statement of the decision.
Together, these cases established important precedents regarding the constitutional rights of prisoners and have been influential in shaping the way that the criminal justice system in the United States operates.
To know more about Estelle v. Gamble here:
https://brainly.com/question/28017300
#SPJ4
I keep trying to sign up,but it keeps saying "I'm sorry but we cant sign you up right now" i think they wrote that? I don't know but they wrote something like that
Answer:
what are you talking about, pal? Are you talking about Brainly? I got banned from brainly yesterday, but now I'm back. So screw all moderators- I only had 12 warnings while others have 30 something.
Do you think Legalism and Confucianism helped ancient China
collectively to move out of the Warring State Period and establish
imperial order? Evaluate
Legalism and Confucianism played a vital role in ancient China's political, economic, and social development. The two schools of thought had different philosophies, which contributed to the country's rise to power after the Warring States Period. They are essential in understanding China's imperial order and its social and political systems during the time.
Both Legalism and Confucianism played a part in the unification of China by providing a unique set of rules for rulers to follow. Legalism offered an authoritarian approach to government, which relied on harsh punishment and strict laws to enforce order. Meanwhile, Confucianism focused on the moral cultivation of individuals and officials to ensure a just society. Hence, the two schools of thought played a critical role in laying the foundation for China's imperial order. However, Confucianism was the primary force in shaping China's imperial order because it became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty. It emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships, which encouraged people to follow a code of ethics based on mutual respect, responsibility, and trust. These principles provided a framework for social, economic, and political interactions between different classes and groups within society.
In conclusion, both Legalism and Confucianism helped ancient China collectively move out of the Warring State Period and establish imperial order. Although Legalism provided an authoritarian approach to government, Confucianism became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty and emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships. Confucianism was the main answer to China's imperial order, while Legalism was an essential contributor.
Learn more about the Han Dynasty: https://brainly.com/question/1149953
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer. Which country has a comparative advantage for producing cups? Units of Cups Produced per Hour per Worker Units of Plates Produced per Hour per Worker India 15 10 France 8 9 Japan 7 7 Canada 6 9 A. Canada B. France C. India D. Japan Reset Next
The country which has a comparative advantage for producing cups is India. As a result the best choice is C.
To establish whether country has a comparative advantage in producing cups, we must evaluate each country's productivity levels in terms of cups produced per hour per worker.
Let's look at the data:
15 cups per hour per worker in India
8 cups per hour per worker in France
7 glasses per hour per worker in Japan
6 cups per hour per worker in Canada
When we compare cup production rates, we observe that India has the highest productivity, with 15 cups produced per hour per worker. France comes in second with 8 cups, Japan comes in third with 7 cups, and Canada comes in third with 6 cups.
When compared to the other countries listed, India has a comparative advantage in making cups because it can create the most cups per hour per worker.
For such more question on comparative:
https://brainly.com/question/30483794
#SPJ11
do individuals make rational decisions when considering committing a crime?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
An individual chooses to commit crime if he can gain more from crime than not committing the crime. This gain from crime is not limited to monetary gains. Criminals may gain a lot from guilty pleasure and excitement from breaking the law, inflicting violence, and consuming illicit drugs. But even when accounting for all the monetary and non-monetary gains from crime, it seems like crime usually does not “pay”(Future learn).
Hence, an individual may choose to commit crime if the immediate rewards of the crime seem to outweigh the long time consequences of the crime. This is a rational decision. Finally, criminals make rational decisions because most of them usually consider the net gain of crime to outweigh the net loss of crime.
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
A minor can undo a contract that has already been completed by having a court _______ the contract to formally cancel it.
a. ratify
b. disaffirm
c. affirm
d. rescind
A minor can undo a contract that has already been completed by having a court disaffirm the contract to formally cancel it. The correct option is B, disaffirm.
A minor is a person who is legally not of age. The legal age of majority in most countries is 18. As a result, a person who is under the age of 18 is considered a minor. A contract is an agreement that is enforceable by law, and it includes all terms and conditions. A contract can be between two or more parties, and it can be verbal or written.
The following terms are applicable in this case: A minor is a person who is not yet of legal age. In the eyes of the law, a minor is someone who has yet to reach the age of majority. A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that is legally binding. The court will disaffirm a contract to formally cancel it. This is true when it comes to contracts that have already been completed. Therefore, the correct option is B, disaffirm.
Learn more about minor https://brainly.com/question/29579429
#SPJ11
14. john has inherited 300 acres of land in texas. since he has no reason to visit texas, he has never seen the land. alex and samantha have moved onto the land and built a log home. they have started using the land and have even fenced much of it in. there is no mortgage on the land and john doesn't receive a tax bill because alex and samantha pay the yearly taxes. after the statutory period in texas has run, alex and samantha would become the owners of the land.
Option 4 is Correct. Texas property totaling 300 acres has been left to John. John doesn't get a tax bill because Alex and Samantha pay the yearly taxes, he has no incentive to travel to Texas, and there is no mortgage on the property.
Around San Felipe de Austin, the colony's hub, which served as the center for the majority of the labors, three groups were organized. From the area of present-day Brenham, Navasota, and La Grange to the Gulf of Mexico, the colonists chose the rich bottomlands of the Brazos, Colorado, and San Bernard rivers. The colonization agreement stipulated that each agricultural family would acquire one labor (about 177 acres), and each ranching family would receive one sitio (about 4,428 acres).
Although they were legally planters, a sizable portion of the colonists identified as stock raisers due to the evident benefits. As a result, the east bank of the Brazos from the Gulf to what is now Brazos County was quickly completely populated. Each family's sitio was to have a frontage on the river equal to about one-fourth of its length.
Learn more about Texas Visit: brainly.com/question/25723904
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
John has inherited 300 acres of land in texas. since he has no reason to visit texas,
1. he has never seen the land.
2. alex and samantha have moved onto the land and built a log home.
3. they have started using the land and have even fenced much of it in.
4. there is no mortgage on the land and john doesn't receive a tax bill because alex and samantha pay the yearly taxes.
5. after the statutory period in texas has run, alex and samantha would become the owners of the land.
Part I) The Great Depression nicely illustrates the concept of complexity because there probably was no single cause for it, but rather a combination of causes.
A) True
B) False
Part II) Ida B. Wells well illustrates the power of the pen in that her work as a journalist helped expose the inherent evils of Jim Crow laws in the South.
A) True
B) False
Part I) The Great Depression nicely illustrates the concept of complexity because there probably was no single cause for it, but rather a combination of causes is True. The Great Depression of the 1930s was a severe economic crisis that lasted from 1929 until the late 1930s, affecting countries worldwide.
The concept of complexity explains that the Great Depression was complex, which means it was caused by a combination of different factors rather than a single cause.The economic boom in the 1920s that preceded the Great Depression created an environment of great optimism. However, the stock market crash of October 1929 marked the beginning of the Great Depression, causing mass unemployment, homelessness, and poverty. The Great Depression resulted from a combination of events, including the stock market crash, banking system failures, reductions in spending and investment, and other factors.
Part II) Ida B. Wells well illustrates the power of the pen in that her work as a journalist helped expose the inherent evils of Jim Crow laws in the South is True. Ida B. Wells was an African American journalist, activist, and educator who was born in Holly Springs, Mississippi, in 1862. Wells's work as a journalist helped to expose the evils of the Jim Crow laws in the South. She wrote numerous articles and pamphlets denouncing the racial segregation laws, and her work inspired others to fight against racial injustice in the United States. Her powerful writing helped to expose the brutal lynching of black Americans, and she was a strong advocate for women's suffrage. Wells was a powerful voice for change, and her work continues to inspire others to fight for justice and equality.
To know more about Great Depression visit-
brainly.com/question/9057117
#SPJ11
A good team member ________________. does the least amount of work possible is actively engaged in the group doesn't let anyone else participate is unreliable
Answer:
B is actively engaged in the group.
after the ratification of the constitution, opposing visions emerged for governing the country that led to the formation of political parties. identify these two political parties, matching the political party with its vision for the new federal government. (not all answers will be used.)
After the ratification of the constitution, opposing visions emerged for governing the country that led to the formation of political parties. The two political parties that emerged in the United States in the late 1700s were the Federalist Party and the Democratic-Republican Party.
Both of these parties had their own vision for the new federal government. The Federalist Party's vision was for a strong federal government with a centralized power structure that would ensure order and stability in the country.The Democratic-Republican Party, on the other hand, believed in a more decentralized system of government with power being shared among the states. They also believed in the importance of individual liberties and limited government intervention in people's lives.
In conclusion, the two political parties that emerged after the ratification of the constitution were the Federalist Party and the Democratic-Republican Party, and they had opposing visions for governing the country. The Federalist Party wanted a strong, centralized government while the Democratic-Republican Party believed in a more decentralized system with limited government intervention.
Learn more about the constitution here:https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ11
terrorist financing differs from money laundering because
Terrorist financing and money laundering are both illicit financial activities, but they differ in their purpose and the nature of the funds being handled.
Money laundering is the process of concealing the true source of illegal funds by making them appear to come from legitimate sources.
The goal of money laundering is to enable criminals to use their illegal proceeds without raising suspicion from law enforcement or financial institutions.
Money launderers often use complex transactions and shell companies to obscure the trail of their illicit funds.
Terrorist financing, on the other hand, involves the provision of financial support to terrorist organizations or individuals to carry out acts of violence.
Unlike money laundering, terrorist financing aims to openly fund activities that are illegal and dangerous. The funds may be used to purchase weapons, explosives, or other resources needed to plan and execute attacks.
Terrorist financiers may use a variety of methods to move money, including cash smuggling, hawala networks, or front companies.
While there may be some overlap between the two activities, such as when criminals use money laundering techniques to hide the source of funds used for terrorist financing, the goals and motivations behind each activity are distinct.
Both money laundering and terrorist financing are serious threats to global security and stability, and efforts to combat them require collaboration and cooperation from law enforcement and financial institutions around the world.
Know more about Terrorist financing here:
https://brainly.com/question/25011837
#SPJ11
If a state governor could choose which kind of grant she received from the federal government, which of the following would she choose so that she could spend the money as she sees fit?
Block
If a state governor could choose which kind of grant she received from the federal government, she would choose a Block grant so that she could spend the money as she sees fit.
Block grants are a type of federal grant that gives state and local governments a large sum of money to use for a broad purpose, such as community development or social services. This type of grant allows for more flexibility in how the money is spent, as opposed to categorical grants, which are more specific and have stricter guidelines for how the money can be used.
Therefore, a state governor would likely choose a block grant in order to have more control over how the money is spent.
Learn more about Block grants https://brainly.com/question/27365006
#SPJ11
Provide your own example (i.e. an example not discussed in the unit lectures, readings or seminars) of a company acting legally but not ethically. Explain why you think this action was unethical despite being within the bounds of the law
One example of a company acting legally but not ethically is a pharmaceutical company that significantly increases the price of a life-saving medication that they have a monopoly on, making it unaffordable for many patients.
While the company's action may be legal because they have the right to set the price for their product, it is considered unethical due to the negative impact on people's health and well-being. By exploiting their market position and raising the price to exorbitant levels, the company prioritizes profit over the accessibility and affordability of a medication that is essential for saving lives. This action disregards the ethical principle of promoting the greater good and demonstrates a lack of social responsibility.
Although the pharmaceutical company's price increase may not violate any laws or regulations, it is widely perceived as unethical. The company's decision to prioritize financial gain at the expense of people's health demonstrates a disregard for ethical considerations and highlights the need for a balance between legality and ethical responsibility. Ethical considerations go beyond mere compliance with laws and regulations, requiring companies to consider the broader impact of their actions on stakeholders and society as a whole.
To know more about company click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30532251
#SPJ11
which has received the least 1st amendment protection?
The statement that has received the most limited 1st Amendment protection is: Radio and Television.
What is 1st Amendment protection?Several essential liberties and rights associated with freedom of expression and speech are safeguarded under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. It reads:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or abridging the freedom of speech, of the press or the right of the people to assemble in peace and petition the Government for a redress of grievances states the Constitution.
Overall, the First Amendment is essential to preserving democratic ideals in the United States, maintaining freedom of expression, and fostering a lively public conversation.
Learn more about 1st Amendment protection here:https://brainly.com/question/9194486
#SPJ4
Which situation is the best example of competition in an economic system? A restaurant just opened down the block from a movie theater, and the restaurant owner hopes to attract diners after each movie. A small CD store slashed its prices to attract customers from a larger store that sells CDs and DVDs. A store that sells sneakers has offered a special deal to customers from a nearby health club. A federal agency has been created to monitor the production and distribution of food supplements.
d. A state agency has been created to monitor the production and distribution of sports drinks.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Answer:
it is B: a small CD store ...
Explanation:
i just took the test
Do you think it would be useful to determine the chemical properties of any of the evidence? Why or why not?
It is useful to determine the chemical properties of any of the evidence because if there is a strange substance near or on the victim that may be able to tell a cause of death.
What are chemical properties?Chemical properties are any characteristics of a substance that can only be formed by changing its chemical identity. Chemical properties are those that manifest themselves during or after a chemical reaction.
Simply put, looking at or feeling a substance's chemical properties is impossible; instead, the substance's internal structure must be significantly altered in order to conduct an investigation into its chemical properties. When a substance undergoes a chemical reaction, it undergoes chemical change, which results in significant changes in its properties. However, a catalytic feature would be an additional chemical feature.
Therefore, the chemical properties of the evidence helps to determine the cause of death.
Learn more about Chemical properties here:
brainly.com/question/1935242
#SPJ2
In the eyes of the law, why do people under age 18 lack contractual ability?Because they have insufficient resources.Because they lack intelligence.Because they're immature.Because they're minors.
In the eyes of the law, people under the age of 18 lack contractual ability because they are considered to be immature.
This means that they are not yet legally adults and therefore do not have the same rights and responsibilities as adults. The law assumes that minors are not yet mature enough to fully understand the implications of their actions, including entering into contracts. As a result, contracts entered into by minors are often considered to be voidable, meaning that they can be canceled if the minor decides to do so. This is designed to protect minors from being taken advantage of by adults who may try to enter into contracts with them.
Learn more about legal reasons why people under the age of 18 lack contractual ability here:https://brainly.com/question/30655482
#SPJ11
A person or enterprise harmed by a Sherman Act violation may bring an action for: a. treble damages. b. quadruple damages. c. punitive damages only. d. actual damages only.
Answer:
a. treble damages
Explanation:
three times as much money in damages as the violation cost them
two things about "i've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck"
1. implying that nixon's denial of the watergate break in is hard to believe
2. attorney general mitchell would support nixon
The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.
The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.
Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.
To know more about Nixon's visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1131063
#SPJ11
Do you think issues like: Marriage rights and Abortion ought to be decided by: (1)Supreme Court (and therefore apply to ALL Americans the same), (2) have State Legislators vote and decide, or (3) have the voters in each state decide these issues? (There are three options here. Pick one and defend it against the other two.)
Please help
he American Law Institute publishes and revises explanations and examples of the law in various areas of the law, known as: ______.
Answer:BrhfdjExplanation:shut up brainly admin is trash
Greg invites his supervisor (Leslie) and two other colleagues (Wanda and Eileen) to go fishing on his boat. While fishing, they have some beers. Eileen gets so drunk that she falls overboard. Greg, Leslie and Wanda rescue Eileen with the help of the harbor police. Leslie reports the incident to the management of the company, which opens an investigation. Greg refuses to cooperate and is disciplined.
a. Greg has a privacy right to keep silent because the incident happened at a social occasion and away from the work place.
b. Greg has a 5thAmendment right not to cooperate because the information that he provides might be used against him by the company in a disciplinary proceeding.
c. Greg's rights have not been violated because the company has legitimate business reasons for seeking information about the fishing incident.
d. Although Greg's right to privacy has been violated, the company can discipline him based on the information that it gets from Leslie, Wanda and Eileen.
Which General Staff member directs all responses and tactical actions to achieve the incident objectives?
A. Operations Division Director
B. Planning Section Chief
C. Tactics Section Chief
D. Operations Section Chief
The General Staff member that directs all responses and tactical actions to achieve the incident objectives is: A. Operations Division Director.
Who is a Operations Division Director?An operations Division Director can be defined as the person whose duty is to manage the day to day operation of a business.
The Director of Operations tend to supervise or oversee all the tactical operation of the company in which they work for and they as well ensures that the goals and objectives of the company is achieved.
Therefore we can conclude that the correct option is A.
Learn more about Operations Division Director here:https://brainly.com/question/6369558
#SPJ1
an edge line that angles toward the center of the road indicates that:
An edge line that angles toward the center of the road indicates a no-passing zone.
An edge line is a solid or broken line painted on the side of a road to indicate the boundary between the travel lane and the shoulder. When an edge line angles toward the center of the road, it creates a triangular shape that points inward. This marking is known as a no passing zone marking and indicates that passing is prohibited in that area. It is important to obey these markings for safety reasons and to avoid potential collisions with oncoming traffic.
An edge line angled towards the center of the road is designed to alert drivers that the roadway is becoming narrower. This could be due to various reasons such as construction, a merge, or a change in the road's design. Drivers should pay close attention and adjust their driving accordingly to ensure safety.
Learn more about edge line: https://brainly.com/question/31915087
#SPJ11
URGENT PLS HELP
As you’re driving with your family on your annual road trip, you see a car stopped on the shoulder of the interstate. There are two police cars behind that car, with their lights flashing. About ten miles down the road, you then see another police car sitting alone in the median between both major lanes of the interstate. You notice that your dad, who is driving, begins to slow down quite substantially. What is MOST LIKELY the reason your dad began to slow down the car?
A.
He is following the law that states drivers must slow down when an officer is behind them.
B.
He is trying to see whether the police car belongs to a local police officer or a state trooper.
C.
He is being careful after being deterred when he previously saw the other car being pulled over earlier.
D.
He is avoiding having the police offer issue a warrant for his arrest.
_____is a criminal offense that employs advanced or emerging technology in it commission.
A cybercrime is a criminal offense that employs advanced or emerging technology in its commission.
A cybercrime is a criminal act that makes use of cutting-edge or developing technology. With the quick development of technology, criminals have discovered new ways to abuse digital networks and systems. Hacking, identity theft, phishing, online fraud, malware attacks, ransomware and other offenses are all considered to be cybercrimes. These crimes frequently employ sophisticated methods and equipment to access, alter or interfere with computer networks, systems, or digital data.
As they work to stay ahead of cybercriminals, law enforcement and cybersecurity experts face challenges due to the dynamic nature of technology. Cybercrimes are expected to become more prevalent and complex as technology advances, necessitating ongoing efforts to combat and lessen their effects on people, businesses and society at large.
Learn more about cybercrime at:
brainly.com/question/32375073
#SPJ4
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
zviad gamsakhurdia was sacked and later accused of dictatorial policies, the jailing of opposition leaders, human rights abuses, etc. following his presidency,
Zviad Gamsakhurdia was dismissed from his presidency and subsequently faced accusations of dictatorial policies, the imprisonment of opposition leaders, and human rights abuses.
Zviad Gamsakhurdia, the first president of Georgia following its independence from the Soviet Union, faced a tumultuous tenure that ultimately led to his dismissal. After coming to power in 1991 with a mandate for democratic reforms, Gamsakhurdia's presidency was marked by increasing authoritarian tendencies, which resulted in widespread criticism and opposition.
Gamsakhurdia's presidency was characterized by the consolidation of power and a disregard for democratic principles. As his presidency progressed, he implemented policies that marginalized opposition voices and curtailed political freedoms. This included the imprisonment of opposition leaders, stifling of independent media, and suppression of dissenting views.
Furthermore, Gamsakhurdia's government was accused of human rights abuses during his time in power. Reports of torture, arbitrary arrests, and mistreatment of political opponents emerged, contributing to a climate of fear and repression. These allegations tarnished his reputation both domestically and internationally, leading to increased discontent among the Georgian population.
The accumulation of grievances against Gamsakhurdia's leadership eventually culminated in a popular uprising and his removal from office in early 1992. The events that followed further exposed the extent of his authoritarian rule and contributed to the overall negative perception of his presidency.
In conclusion, Zviad Gamsakhurdia's dismissal from the presidency and subsequent accusations of dictatorial policies, the imprisonment of opposition leaders, and human rights abuses reflect the erosion of democratic values and the abuse of power during his tenure. These events highlight the importance of upholding democratic principles, respecting human rights, and fostering an inclusive and transparent governance structure to ensure the well-being and stability of a nation.
Learn more about president
brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ11
The petitioner is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.
A.) True
B.) False
Answer: I believe its false
Explanation: