The different models of representation in the context of Congress refer to descriptive representation, substantive representation, and trustee representation.
Descriptive representation focuses on the demographic characteristics of representatives matching those of their constituents, while substantive representation focuses on representing the interests and policy preferences of constituents. Trustee representation involves representatives using their own judgment and expertise to make decisions in the best interest of the nation. The extent to which Congress is responsive to the people and effectively addresses national needs depends on the balance between these models and the specific approach taken by individual representatives.
You can learn more about Congress at
https://brainly.com/question/491441
#SPJ11
Tell me a fact about Authoritorianism
Explanation:
Authoritarianism is a form of government characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of a strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting.
Answer:
.
Explanation:
Give an example of both a primary and secondary source of information. Which source of information do you think is likely to be most accurate? Why?
Answer:
Examples of a primary source are: Original documents such as diaries, speeches, manuscripts, letters, interviews, records, eyewitness accounts, autobiographies. Empirical scholarly works such as research articles, clinical reports, case studies, dissertations.
Examples of a secondary source are: Publications such as textbooks, magazine articles, book reviews, commentaries, encyclopedias, almanacs.
Explanation:
A primary source is a video of something proving exactly what happened in an event. A secondary source is newspaper, a summary of the event. A primary source is more accurate because it actually shows what happened, while a secondary source can be biased and opinionated.
did the white house block a investigation for the watergate scandal?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
what was the most important geographic factor in the outcome of the war
The most important geographic factor in the outcome of war can often be the presence of natural barriers. These barriers can shape military operations, affect defense strategies, and impact supply lines, ultimately influencing the course and result of the conflict.
Determining the most important geographic factor in the outcome of a war can vary depending on the specific conflict. However, one significant geographic factor that often plays a crucial role is the presence of natural barriers. Natural barriers, such as mountains, rivers, or deserts, can significantly impact military operations, defense strategies, and supply lines.
They can act as a form of protection for one side while posing obstacles for the other, thus influencing the outcome of the war. For example, in World War II, the geographic factor of the English Channel served as a vital barrier for the Allied forces against potential German invasions.
The natural barrier of the channel made it challenging for the German military to launch an effective amphibious assault on the British Isles, ultimately contributing to the defense and eventual victory of the Allied forces. Similarly, in the Korean War, the geographic factor of the 38th parallel played a crucial role.
This parallel acted as a natural dividing line between North and South Korea, influencing the military strategies and the outcome of the conflict. The difficult terrain and rugged mountains along the parallel affected troop movements and made it challenging for either side to gain a significant advantage.
know more about World War II here:
https://brainly.com/question/2141423
#SPJ8
How many people are estimated to have died worldwide during the bubonic plague outbreak?
10 to 25 million
20 to 40 million
25 to 50 million
75 to 100 million
Answer:
75 to 100 million
Explanation:
had the same question
the chapter opening case on the fishing industry focused on what ethical dilemma?
The chapter opening case on the fishing industry focused on the ethical dilemma of overfishing.
Overfishing is the practice of harvesting fish from the ocean at a rate that exceeds the natural replenishment capacity of fish populations, leading to a decline in fish stocks and potential ecological imbalances. The case highlighted the conflict between the economic interests of the fishing industry, which seeks to maximize profits, and the long-term sustainability of marine ecosystems and the livelihoods of fishing communities. The ethical dilemma revolves around balancing the short-term gains from intensive fishing practices with the long-term conservation and responsible management of fishery resources to ensure their availability for future generations.
To learn more about overfishing, Click here: brainly.com/question/31816453
#SPJ11
How do you maintain good relation with your friend? Write in a sentence
To maintain good relations with a friend, one should be supportive, understanding, and willing to listen and communicate openly and honestly.
Why were the Southern States concerned with the extension of slavery in the new territories?
Answer. Southerners wanted slavery extended to the new territories so the south could keep enough strength in the Senate to protect Southern interests (slavery). The North was better prepared economically to fight the Civil War. The North had the resources that enabled it to lead in production.
Explanation:
Select ALL that apply. Which of the following applies about the use of resources to finance war and conflict? A. Houses are the only form of real estate trafficked to generate revenue for political conflict B. Timber, oil, minerals, and wildlife have contributed to conflict financing C. The theft of rights to real estate in war zones has generated revenue to finance armed conflict D. To finance conflict, the same piece of real estate may be sold to multiple buyers without their knowledge E. Stolen properties can fund multiple sides of conflict as territory is gained and lost during a war
Options B, C, D, and E all apply about the use of resources to finance war and conflict.
The following applies about the use of resources to finance war and conflict: Timber, oil, minerals, and wildlife have contributed to conflict financing. The theft of rights to real estate in war zones has generated revenue to finance armed conflict.
To finance conflict, the same piece of real estate may be sold to multiple buyers without their knowledge. Stolen properties can fund multiple sides of conflict as territory is gained and lost during a war.
Therefore, options B, C, D, and E all apply about the use of resources to finance war and conflict.
Option A is incorrect because houses are not the only form of real estate trafficked to generate revenue for political conflict.
To know more about war
https://brainly.com/question/197175
#SPJ11
How many senators does it take to confirm a supreme court justice.
Explain how seeds travel. Be sure to give examples to support your explanation.
In an ecosystem, pollinating agents like insects, wind, and water help seeds move from place to place.
An ecosystem is described as a system made up of all living things as well as the physical elements with which they interact. The cycles of nutrients and the movement of energy connect the abiotic and biotic elements.
Through the process of photosynthesis, energy is introduced to the system.
Animals are crucial in the flow of energy because they eat one another.
This causes a transfer of matter and energy to occur within the system.
The amount of biomass present is influenced by living things as well.
Through bacteria breaking down dead plants and animals, nutrients are returned to the soil.
How did the case of Leo Frank lead to an increase in racial inequality in the South?
O A Southern leaders like Tom Watson began an anti-Semitic campaign against Jewish businesses.
o B. Southern leaders like the Bourbon Triumvirate proposed the convict lease system.
oC Southern leaders like Henry Grady encouraged poor Southerners to increase Jim Crow laws.
OD. Southern leaders like the Bourbon Triumvirate began to call for an increase of voting rights for immigrants.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
If the citizens of a country are good,the country will prosper.Justify.
Answer:
Yes ,I support this statement that if the citizens of a country are good,the country will prosper.............................................'
A distinguishing factor between a brand name and a brand mark is that a brand name Group of answer choices implies an organization's name. identifies only one item in the product mix. creates customer loyalty. consists of words. is registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
A distinguishing factor between a brand name and a brand mark is that a brand name implies an organization's name, while a brand mark consists of words.
A brand name is a crucial element of branding that represents the name of an organization or company. It serves as a verbal identifier and can be a word, phrase, or combination of words that uniquely identifies the brand. A brand name helps establish brand recognition and recall, allowing customers to associate specific products or services with a particular organization. It goes beyond identifying a single item in the product mix and often represents the entire range of offerings associated with the brand.
On the other hand, a brand mark refers to the visual or graphic representation used to identify a brand. Unlike a brand name, a brand mark does not necessarily imply an organization's name or consist of words. It can be a symbol, logo, emblem, or other visual elements that visually represent the brand. A brand mark is designed to evoke recognition and association with the brand and can be used alongside or independent of a brand name.
While a brand name may create customer loyalty and can be registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for legal protection, these factors are not exclusive to brand names and can also apply to brand marks depending on their usage and significance in building a brand identity.
To learn more about trademark click here brainly.com/question/14578580
#SPJ11
The federalists debate icivics I DONT UNDERSTAND THIS ONE
This image contains author's view on bill of rights. The American worldview of freedom, individual liberty, minimal government intrusion, and the rule of law is embodied in the Bill of Rights.
The answer to the questions from the excerpt are-
1. The author uses the words like Unnecessary and Dangerous to describe bill of rights.
2. The part of constitution quoted in the text is-
" We the people of United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our prosperity do ordain and establish this constitution of United States of America."
3. No, the author does not believe there is a need for Bill of Rights.
4. In this excerpt, The author is adamant about getting rid of the Bill of Rights because, in his opinion, individuals have been given more freedom than is necessary. He believes that this might result in power abuse.
To know more about Bill of Rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30092735
#SPJ1
Where do a majority of the tobacco farmers live in Southern Africa?
Answer:
I would say Malawi because Southern Africa's biggest tobacco imports are from there
Explanation:
Which of the following best
describes what a church doctrine
is?
A. It lists the church finances.
B. It shows how much land a church owns.
C. It is an invitation to visit a church.
D. It is the basic beliefs of a church.
where will you find a pizza restaurant that delivers by airplane?
Answer:
Alaska
Explanation:
Papa Murphy's in Anchorage, Alaska doesn't deliver within 30 minutes, but that's because they deliver by plane.
What are some positive consequences of globalization? What are some negative consequences of globalization?
Answer:
Explanation:
POSITIVE- Inward investment by TNCs helps countries by providing new jobs and skills for local people.
TNCs bring wealth and foreign currency to local economies when they buy local resources, products and services. The extra money created by this investment can be spent on education, health and infrastructure.
The sharing of ideas, experiences and lifestyles of people and cultures. People can experience foods and other products not previously available in their countries.
NEGATIVE- They may pollute the environment, run risks with safety or impose poor working conditions and low wages on local workers. Globalisation is viewed by many as a threat to the world's cultural diversity.
My brother loves to cook, he especially loves to barbecue.
Which answer choice best corrects the run-on sentence?
A. My brother loves to cook; and he especially loves to barbecue.
B. My brother loves to cook: and he especially loves to barbecue.
C. My brother loves to cook, but he especially loves to barbecue.
D. My brother loves to cook but he especially loves to barbecue.
Answer: A
Explanation: hope this helps!
what was charles hamilton houston’s principal weapon in combatting discrimination?
Charles Hamilton Houston's principal weapon in combatting discrimination was his strategic use of the law. He was a pioneering civil rights attorney and legal scholar who played a critical role in dismantling segregation and discrimination in the United States.
Houston believed that the best way to achieve social justice was through legal means, and he worked tirelessly to challenge the discriminatory practices and policies of the Jim Crow era. He was a key figure in the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case, which ultimately led to the desegregation of American schools. Houston's legacy continues to inspire generations of civil rights activists and legal professionals who are committed to advancing equality and justice for all.
To know more about Charles hamilton please click:-
https://brainly.com/question/31538079
#SPJ11
Warren harding won the residency in 1920 because of his overwhelming support by women who finally had the right to vote.Do you agree with the preceding statement?why or why not?
The statement that Warren Harding won the presidency in 1920 because of his overwhelming support by women who finally had the right to vote is True.
Why the statement is trueThe statement is true because Harding supported two core issues that were of central concern in the United States at that time.
First, he was against the overconsumption of alcohol and he supported the women suffrage movement that had gained ground at that time. Because he was on the good books of both the religious people and women, he won the presidency.
Learn more about Waren Harding here:
https://brainly.com/question/1291396
#SPJ1
Concurrent powers are powers in the Constitution that are given to what level of government?
Answer:
Concurrent powers are shared by both the federal government and state governments.
Explanation:
PLZ HURRY
In their competition for power, nations raced to
A. create a ances.
B. build new colonies.
C. educate their citizens.
D. improve their quality of life
Who is in charge if the President dies?
Answer:
The vice president (kamala harris)
then if they die, the speaker of the house of representatives (nancy pelosi)
then president of the senate (patrick leahy)
then secretary of state (antony blinken)
then secretary of the treasury (janet yellen)
then secretary of defense (lloyd austin)
Writing Journal Entry #3: Label your journal entry “Taghaza, March, 1324, dusk.” As you make camp in Taghaza, you hear grumblings in the hajj. Questions are being asked about the
route taken north. Aren’t their other ways to get across the Sahara? You are both intimidated and fas-
created by this town literally made of salt. What do you think of it? How do you feel about the route
the hajj has taken?
Taghaza, March, 1324, dusk.
As I make camp in this town made of salt, I am both intimidated and fascinated by its unique beauty. The sun has set and the colors of the salt buildings change with each passing moment. However, my thoughts are interrupted by the grumblings in the hajj. Questions are being asked about the route taken north and if there are other ways to cross the Sahara. I, too, have been pondering the same question. The journey has been arduous, and we have lost many travelers along the way.
I understand the concerns of my fellow travelers, but I also appreciate the determination of the hajj's leaders to find a safe and reliable route. It is easy to underestimate the challenges of crossing the Sahara, and I have seen firsthand the dangers of venturing off course. The journey may be difficult, but I believe we are in good hands.
As I gaze upon the shimmering salt buildings, I can't help but feel grateful for the opportunity to witness such a unique place. The journey has been long and challenging, but moments like these remind me of the beauty and wonder that can be found in the most unexpected places. I look forward to what the rest of the journey has in store.
how did ancient china's government influence the lives of people in this civilization?
Answer:
idk sorry
Explanation:
What are the two objective-setting methodologies? please explain
each
There are two ways to define objectives: the traditional method and management by objectives.
Setting goals is not an easy task; it is really fairly complex. The goals must be achievable and practical while also demonstrating a high degree of efficiency. In the traditional approach, individuals at the highest level of the organisation define the goals for those at lower levels.
Their drive, sense of commitment, and sense of accountability may all decline as a result of this strategy. A management strategy known as "management by objectives" is founded on the idea that turning a company goal into a person's goal will increase employee commitment, which in turn will improve performance.
Know more about Setting goals here
https://brainly.com/question/1705973
#SPJ4
What is the empathy-altruism hypothesis?
The empathy-altruism hypothesis suggests that empathic concern or empathy for others can lead to altruistic behavior, where individuals are motivated to help others purely for their well-being, without expecting anything in return.
The empathy-altruism hypothesis, proposed by social psychologist Daniel Batson, explores the relationship between empathy and altruistic behavior. According to this hypothesis, when individuals experience empathic concern for someone in need, they are more likely to engage in selfless and altruistic acts to alleviate the other person's suffering or improve their well-being.
Empathy refers to the ability to understand and share the emotions of others. Empathic concern specifically refers to the emotional response of feeling compassion and concern for someone in distress.
The empathy-altruism hypothesis challenges the notion of pure egoism, which suggests that all helping behavior is ultimately driven by self-interest. Instead, it proposes that genuine empathic concern can elicit altruistic behavior, where individuals prioritize the welfare of others over their own self-interest.
Research studies have provided support for the empathy-altruism hypothesis, demonstrating that when individuals experience empathic concern, they are more likely to engage in acts of kindness and help others, even when there is no personal gain or reward involved.
In summary, the empathy-altruism hypothesis suggests that empathy and empathic concern can motivate individuals to engage in selfless acts of altruism, driven by a genuine concern for the well-being of others.
learn more about empathy-altruism hypothesis here:
https://brainly.com/question/4393121
#SPJ11
What student-centered organization did John Lewis lead?
Answer:The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC)
Explanation:i think this is the answer