What did the us want during the cuban missile crisis.
Answers
During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United States had several key objectives:
1. Removal of Soviet missiles from Cuba: The primary goal of the United States was to ensure the removal of Soviet nuclear missiles that were being deployed in Cuba. The presence of these missiles posed a significant threat to U.S. national security, as they could potentially reach major American cities within minutes. The United States demanded the dismantling and removal of these missiles to eliminate this direct threat.
2. Prevention of future missile deployments: In addition to the immediate removal of the missiles, the United States aimed to prevent any future Soviet missile deployments in Cuba or other locations near U.S. territory. The U.S. wanted to establish a clear message that such actions would not be tolerated and to maintain its strategic advantage in the arms race with the Soviet Union.
3. Preservation of regional stability: The United States sought to maintain stability in the Caribbean region and prevent any escalation of tensions that could lead to a broader conflict. They aimed to protect the interests of their allies in the region and ensure that Cuba would not become a base for further Soviet aggression or expansion.
4. Avoidance of direct military confrontation: Throughout the crisis, the United States aimed to resolve the situation peacefully and avoid a direct military confrontation with the Soviet Union. While prepared for potential military action if necessary, the U.S. sought a diplomatic solution that would safeguard its objectives without risking an all-out war with the Soviet Union.
To read more about Cuban Missile Crisis click here
https://brainly.com/question/523941
#SPJ11
Related Questions
True or false president Truman woz the final speaker at the Convention when the United Nations was formed
Answers
Which of the following is NOT the responsibility of Congress?
A. Servants of the people.
B. Interest groups.
C. Political parties.
D. Vetoing Bills.
Answers
The Iraq War is a subject of much debate. In the space below, construct a claim that supports or refutes the decision to invade Iraq. Your claim should be at least 250-words and follow these directions:
Research on your own and find a primary source on the Iraq War
A primary source is an original document or artifact that comes from the period of time being studied.
Someone from that time period actually wrote, created, or used the object the historian is studying.
Using the information from your primary source, and the information from the lesson, develop a claim concerning the decision to invade Iraq.
Fulfill the following concerning your claim:
Your claim should clearly state whether or not the U.S. should have invade Iraq.
Your claim must have supporting statements that are original ideas, as well as facts and evidence from your source, and information from the lesson, that supports it.
You should have a counterclaim that refutes your claim. Your writing will identify the stance and prove that it is false.
Write an informative essay that meets the following expectations:
Establishes and maintains formal and objective tone
Uses words, phrases, and clauses to link each section of writing together and create cohesion between claims and evidence
Follows expectations of conventions
Provide a concluding paragraph that:
Synthesizes your original claim
Summarizes your key points
Adds concluding thoughts
Cite your primary source and this lesson as a secondary source at the bottom of your essay.
Answers
Claim: The decision to invade Iraq by the United States was unjustified and should not have been undertaken.
Lack of substantial evidence: Despite claims of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), the presence of such weapons was not conclusively proven, as stated by intelligence reports and subsequent investigations.Questionable motives: Some argue that the invasion was driven by geopolitical interests and a desire for control over Iraq's oil resources rather than genuine concerns for national security or democracy promotion.Destabilization of the region: The invasion led to a power vacuum, contributing to sectarian violence, the rise of extremist groups, and regional instability, rather than achieving stability and peace as intended.Humanitarian and economic costs: The war resulted in significant loss of civilian lives, military casualties, and financial burdens, diverting resources from pressing domestic needs and contributing to long-lasting consequences for the Iraqi population.Counterclaim: The invasion was necessary to remove a dangerous regime and promote democracy.Conclusion: Considering the lack of substantial evidence for WMDs, questionable motives, destabilization of the region, and the human and economic costs incurred, it can be argued that the decision to invade Iraq was unwarranted and should not have been pursued.For more such question on invade Iraq
https://brainly.com/question/26172813
#SPJ8
In debates leading up to the three-fifths compromise, northen states argued that
Answers
Answer:
Slaves should not be included when counting a state's population to determine representation in congress.
Explanation:
Answer:
The three-fifths compromise was a big component of the Connecticut Compromise. Since the compromise said that representation in the House of Representatives was to be based on population, the “value” of a slave had to be defined. In particular, smaller states did not think larger states with more slaves should be allowed to consider slaves as part of their population. A compromise was reached: a slave would count as three-fifths of a person when counting population for representation.
What caused the declaration of war?
Answers
Answer:
It's congress.
Explanation:
The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war.
Answer:
Although some historians believe the British impressments were the primary cause of the declaration of war, others believe the War Hawks were to blame. A group of Republican congressmen known as the War Hawks wanted to go to war with the United Kingdom.
Explanation:
how did the dominion of new england (1686) affect governments like the one described above? choose 1 answer: choose 1 answer: (choice a, checked) it chose two representatives from each colony to serve in the british parliament. a it chose two representatives from each colony to serve in the british parliament. (choice b) it abolished legislative assemblies and reinforced the authoritarian model of colonial rule. b it abolished legislative assemblies and reinforced the authoritarian model of colonial rule. (choice c) it created a parliamentary system in the colonies. c it created a parliamentary system in the colonies. (choice d) it backed the legitimacy of colonial governments. d it backed the legitimacy of colonial governments.
Answers
Regarding the specific question about the Dominion of New England (1686) and its effect on colonial governments, the correct answer is (b) it abolished legislative assemblies and reinforced the authoritarian model of colonial rule.
The Dominion of New England was a single administrative unit created by King James II in an attempt to better control the colonies in New England. It combined several colonies under one governor, Sir Edmund Andros, and abolished their separate legislatures. This centralized power and reinforced the authoritarian model of colonial rule, making it more difficult for colonists to participate in their own governance. Therefore the correct answer is (b).
For more such questions on colonial rule
https://brainly.com/question/399285
#SPJ11
In your own words, tell me what you think a revolution is and do
you think revolutions are still necessary in the 21st century?
Answers
A revolution, in broad terms, refers to a radical and transformative change in society, often accompanied by significant shifts in political, social, economic, or cultural structures.
It typically involves widespread and collective actions taken by individuals or groups to challenge and overthrow existing power structures in pursuit of a new vision or ideology.Revolutions historically have been driven by various factors, such as oppressive regimes, inequality, social injustice, political repression, or economic hardships. They can emerge as a response to the grievances of marginalized groups, seeking to challenge and reshape the status quo.
As for the necessity of revolutions in the 21st century, it is a complex and subjective question. While many societies have made substantial progress in terms of democracy, human rights, and social justice, significant challenges and inequalities persist. Issues like wealth disparity, systemic discrimination, political corruption, environmental degradation, and the limitations of existing systems can still generate discontent and demands for change.
However, the nature of social and political activism has evolved in the 21st century. Movements and protests have increasingly embraced nonviolent means, advocating for reform, social movements, and incremental change rather than seeking to completely overthrow existing systems through violent revolutions.
Whether a revolution is deemed necessary or not depends on the specific context and the goals being pursued. Some argue that incremental reforms and peaceful means of change can address societal issues effectively, while others believe that fundamental structural changes may require more disruptive and transformative approaches.
Ultimately, the question of whether revolutions are still necessary in the 21st century is a matter of ongoing debate and depends on one's perspective on the existing systems, the specific issues at hand, and the effectiveness of various means of social and political change.
To know more about transformative visit
https://brainly.com/question/33487023
#SPJ11
A revolution can be described as a profound and often violent change in the social, political, or economic structures of a society. It typically involves a collective uprising by a significant portion of the population against an existing system or regime, driven by a shared desire for fundamental transformation. Revolutions aim to challenge and overthrow oppressive or unjust power structures and establish new ones that reflect the aspirations and needs of the people.
In the 21st century, while many societies have made significant progress in terms of social and political advancements, there are still instances where revolutions can be seen as necessary. Factors that might contribute to the need for revolutions include systemic inequality, political corruption, authoritarianism, lack of basic human rights, and social injustices. In such cases, revolutions can serve as a catalyst for change, giving a voice to marginalized groups and creating opportunities for building more inclusive, equitable, and democratic societies.
It's important to note that not all revolutions are violent or result in widespread destruction. Peaceful revolutions, driven by mass protests, civil disobedience, and collective action, can also bring about transformative changes. In the 21st century, advancements in technology and communication have provided new avenues for mobilization and organizing, making peaceful revolutions more viable than ever before.
However, it is crucial to evaluate each situation individually and consider the potential consequences of revolution. While revolutions have the potential to bring about positive change, they can also be accompanied by significant instability, violence, and loss of life. Therefore, it is essential to seek peaceful means of addressing grievances and pursuing social progress whenever possible.
To know more about revolution Visit
https://brainly.com/question/21398749
#SPJ11
after the whigs won the presidency for the first time, what unfortunate event prevented them from implementing their program?
Answers
The Whigs won the presidency for the first time in 1840, with William Henry Harrison as their candidate. However, shortly after taking office, Harrison fell ill and passed away.
This unfortunate event prevented the Whigs from fully implementing their program. Harrison's vice president, John Tyler, assumed the presidency, but he was not fully aligned with the Whig agenda. Tyler had previously been a Democrat and disagreed with some of the Whigs' policy goals.
As a result, the Whigs faced challenges in advancing their legislative agenda and implementing their program during Tyler's presidency. This led to tensions and conflicts between Tyler and the Whig-controlled Congress, ultimately hindering the Whigs' ability to enact their intended policies.
To know more about presidency refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ11
what was the primary purpose of southern implementation of black codes
Answers
Following the Civil War, Southern governments passed black codes to keep African Americans from obtaining political and economic independence.
What was the response to Brown v. Board of Education in the South?Board of Education during the early afternoon of May 17, 1954, white political figures from the South denounced the choice and swore to challenge it. James Eastland, a strong Mississippi senator, stated that "the South would not abide by nor respect any legislative decision by the a political body.
What was the Southern response to desegregation?Following their example, many Southern towns violently and in protest opposed integration. White inhabitants of Mansfield, Texas, a rural community of 1500 people, protested the admission of 12 Black students to Mansfield High School, which was exclusively for white students.
To know more about Southern visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13661560
#SPJ1
Luckily, Texas rivers were deep enough for boats to travel on them. Therefore, many rivers in Texas were used for shipping.
O True
O False
Answers
What was one result of President’s Trump’s executive order that restricted travel from seven foreign countries?
Congress passed a similar law a year later.
The order was revoked by President Biden.
A federal agency was created to implement it.
The Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional.
Answers
The people whom you support financially, such as children, are dependents.
Group of answer choices
True
False
Answers
Answer: That would be TRUE
what did William Pitt do in the french and Indian war
Answers
in the late nineteenth century, the most striking feature of the american party system was its select one: a. ideological divisions. b. general activism. c. lack of corruption. d. remarkable stability. e. multiple parties.
Answers
The correct option is D ; Remarkable stability, Winning local elections was the primary objective of party professionals who made their living off of politics.
The primary domestic issues included the need for a new banking system, corruption in party politics, primary elections, the regulation of railroads and large corporations ("trusts") by the government, the value of money (gold versus silver), the protective tariff, the role of labor unions, child labor, and the need for a new banking system.
The main concerns in the economy were tariff policy and whether or not the gold standard should be maintained for the money supply.
The 19th century saw significant political and social transformation, including revisions to the voting system, poverty alleviation, education, and public health.
Learn more about to Remarkable stability
https://brainly.com/question/27878316
#SPJ4
In your opinion (and using facts to support your POV), did the
United States have to end World War Two by dropping the atomic
bombs on Japan? Do you see a different route to ending the war?
Your respo
Answers
In my opinion, the reason for the decision to use atomic bombs was to bring the war to a quick end and avoid the need for a costly invasion of Japan. The U.S. government believed that an invasion of Japan would result in heavy casualties on both sides, and could drag on for months or even years. President Harry S. Truman, who made the final decision to use the bombs, argued that the use of atomic weapons would save lives in the long run by ending the war quickly.However, there were other options available to the U.S. government at the time. One alternative was to continue the conventional bombing campaign against Japan, which was already causing significant damage to Japanese cities and infrastructure. Another option was to negotiate a surrender with Japan, which had already been weakened by the war and was facing a dire situation. However, the Japanese government was reluctant to surrender unconditionally, and it was not clear whether a negotiated settlement could be reached.
s you read this lesson, fill out the chart to describe early North American societies. People Environment Achievements 1. Pacific Northwest peoples 2. Pueblo builders
Answers
The people of North American societies were considered less developed than those of the South, however, they were able to adapt features of their environment in creating very diverse cultures and complex societies that were able to trade and construct magnificent buildings.
The North American groups had no great empires, as such, they left few ruins in comparison with those of Peru and Mexico in the South.
Pacific Northwest peoples had environments rich in resources as they were close to the sea. As such, activities they participated in included whale hunting in boats and canoes, farming (on lands that were not very arable), and is uniquely known for the creation of social classes.
In contrast, the Pueblo Builders were located in the canyon regions and were very skilled builders often using the walls of the canyons in building homes and defensive formations.
Learn more about North American Societies here: https://brainly.com/question/514661?referrer=searchResults
How many of the world’s 196 nations have ratified the geneva convention of 1949?.
Answers
In total, 196 countries have signed and ratified the 1949 conventions over the years, including many that did not participate or sign until decades later.
These include Angola, Bangladesh, and Iran.The four 1949 Geneva Conventions, which every country in the world has ratified, make up a significant portion of international humanitarian law.
The Geneva Agreements of August 12, 1949, which are four new conventions with 429 articles of law, were created in 1949 by an international conference of diplomats on the foundation of prior accords for the protection of war victims. The Geneva Conventions are enhanced by the 1977 and 2005 Additional Protocols. In all circumstances of declared war or any other armed confrontation between states, the Geneva Conventions are applicable. They also apply when foreign troops are occupying a country in whole or in part, even if there is no violent resistance to the occupation.
To know more about Geneva Conventions, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12378719
#SPJ4
when did starbucks introduce nitro cold brew in stores?
Answers
During the summer of 2015.
Distrust of foreigners and foreign ideas
Success in war
Belief in neutrality
Anarchist violence
Espionage and Sedition Acts
Answers
Answer: A, D, E
A- distrust of foreigners and foreign ideas
D- anarchist violence
E- espionage and sedition acts
Explanation:
with all respect, the other person literally couldn't be more wrong <3
Thomas Jefferson’s presidency domestic policy
Answers
How is American not living up to its values
Answers
America values freedom but in recent years it has become more and more clear that it is not as free as America claims to be
the map best supports the argument that a key component for success of international trading companiesin the 17thand 18thcenturies was
Answers
The map best demonstrates the claim that strong diplomatic and naval backing were essential to the prosperity of international trading commercial businesses in the 17th and 18th centuries.
The entire number of sailing ships still outnumbered the total number of steamships in all areas by a wide margin. Tropical goods (such sugar and molasses) produced on plantations were sent to Europe and the American colonies. Tobacco, furs, indigo (a dye), and timber (for shipbuilding) were also exported from North America to Europe.
The three English-based East India Companies—the EIC (1600–1858), the Hudson's Bay Company (1670–present), and the Royal African Company (1672–1750)—as well as the Dutch East India Companies (VOC; Vereenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie; 1601–1799) and Dutch West—were the major players.
Learn more about international trading Visit: brainly.com/question/30653579
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
The map best supports the argument that a key component for success of international trading companiesin the 17thand 18thcenturies was for _____ centuries.
what events led up t the boston massacre?
Answers
Answer:
The heavy presence of British troops in Boston that lead to the fatal shooting was the direct results of the Townshend Acts passed by British Parliament to impose additional taxes on common products imported into the Colonies. These products among others included paper, glass and tea.
Explanation:
Which expressed power of Congress does this example best describe?
Congress determines the amount of paper money and
coins that will circulate through the economy.
OA. Collecting taxes
B. Printing money
OC. Regulating commerce
D. Establishing federal courts
Answers
The expressed power by the excerpt of the congress is Printing money
What are the powers of the congress?To clarify, the powers granted to Congress by the US Constitution are:
A. Collecting taxes - This refers to the power of Congress to levy and collect taxes from individuals and businesses within the United States to fund the federal government.
B. Printing money - This refers to the power of Congress to regulate the currency and coinage of the United States, including the production of paper money and coins.
C. Regulating commerce - This refers to the power of Congress to regulate interstate and international commerce, including trade, transportation, and communication.
D. Establishing federal courts - This refers to the power of Congress to establish a system of federal courts and to determine the jurisdiction of those courts.
Read more on congress here:https://brainly.com/question/1578160
#SPJ1
How did farmers become enlightened on political affairs?
-From their local villages.
-Through an early postal service.
-By sharing information the market days.
-They only knew of their own local events.
Answers
The correct answer is C) sharing information at the market days.
Farmers became enlightened on political affairs by sharing information at the market days.
Framers were modest people dedicated to their work in the farm fields. Hard work indeed, to produce the necessary amount of crops to maintain their families.
In the early 1700s linnaeus came up with a new system of classification of living things that eventually replaced the one that had been used since aristotle developed it in ancient greece about 2000 years earlier. Why was a change necessary?.
Answers
So many new species were being discovered, that it was impossible to arrange them all in a hierarchy based on the relative complexity of species.
Linnaeus: Who was he?The contemporary system of naming species was formalized by the Swedish botanist, zoologist, taxonomist, and physician Carl Linnaeus, also known as Carl von Linné after being knighted in 1761. As the "founder of modern taxonomy," he is well-known. His name is spelled Carolus Linnaeus in Latin for many of his writings and Carolus a Linné after his 1761 ennoblement.
By comparing living things, Linnaeus classified them. For instance, he would examine the molars of various species to determine their relationship. DNA is being utilized to categorize various life types. When it comes to classifying fossils, which lack DNA, scientists still rely on similarities between fossils and between fossils and contemporary lifeforms.
Learn more about Linnaeus with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/3470033
#SPJ4
feudalism in england under william i differed from feudalism in other countries in that
Answers
Feudalism in England under William I differed from feudalism in other countries in that it was more centralized and focused on the king as the ultimate authority. While in other countries, feudalism was more decentralized and focused on local lords as the primary authority figures.
Under William I, the king granted large estates to his loyal supporters, known as tenants-in-chief, who in turn granted smaller estates to knights and other vassals. This system allowed for the king to maintain a strong hold over the land and the people, as all levels of authority ultimately answered to him. Additionally, William I introduced the Domesday Book, which was a comprehensive survey of all the land and property in England. This helped the king keep track of who owned what, and further strengthened his control over the country.
In contrast, feudalism in other countries, such as France and Germany, was much more fragmented. Local lords held significant power and often competed with each other for influence and territory. The king or emperor had less control over these lords, and it was more difficult to maintain a cohesive system of governance.
Know more about feudalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/11276385
#SPJ11
Term for a society in which fathers and husbands are in control *
Ten Commandments
Pastoral
diaspora
Torah
patriarchal
Answers
what is antisemitism?
Answers
Antisemitism is defined as an extreme prejudice or hatred against people of Jewish descent.
The most common historical implication of antisemitism is the Holocaust, which enforced absurd regulations within the Jewish community such as segregation and the Nuremburg Laws, which bound Jews to a specific range of locations leading to their deaths.
three angles of a quadrilateral are 98 72 and 105 what is the exterior angle of the fourth angle
Answers
Alrighty, the sum of all the angles of a quadrilateral, as you might know, is 360 degrees. So since you're given all the 3 angles, you can find the 4th one by subtracting the sum of all the 3 angles from 360.
\(360 - (98 + 72 + 105)\)
which when evaluated gives,
\(360 - 275 = 85\)
Now that's the interior angle not the exterior. To get the exterior we need to subtract the angle from 180 which gives:
\(180 - 85\)
which evaluates to \(95\).
Here's the diagram if needed :P
