what does jefferson state directly as the reason thid declaration had to be written?​

Answer:

this is what I found: "Frontier areas may be defined at the community level by county, ZIP code or census tract; however, they are most often delineated by county. Many frontier counties are located in the West, a part of the country where individual counties tend to cover a large geographic"

I'm not too sure if that means it's TRUE or false tho. I'm sorry

Answer:

true.

Explanation:

A frontier is something that separates countries, so yes.

Answer: A i think sorry if  its wrong

Explanation:

Answer:

GOOOOD APPPLLLLEEEESSSS

Explanation:

Answer:

LOL

Explanation:

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

I took the test on edge :>

Explanation:

I hope it's helpful for you ☺️

Considering the available options, Lobbyists work on behalf of the following, including "political action committees (PACs)."

The other group of people Lobbyist work on their behalf includes the following:BusinessesInterest groupsUnions

Who is a Lobbyist?

Lobbyists are the kind of people that involve themselves in an organized attempt to use their influence on legislators to get a desired outcome or bill passed.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A, C, D, and E.

Learn more about Lobbyists here: https://brainly.com/question/509906

Answer:

A, vote or anticipate in government.

Explanation:

They were not allowed to vote and lost most control of their property (if they had any to begin with) in marriage. They could not divorce, and even single women could not make contracts, sue anyone, or be sued, at least until the late 18th century.

The question is in relation to producing an abundance in the means of living e.g. shelter, food and clothing. Before capitalism became a global system humankind were always confronted with the constant problem of producing sufficient products so there was a surplus and then distributing these surplus products in order to survive. Natural scarcity was to all intents and circumstances the order of the day. Whole communities and civilisations could be wiped out through climate change, flooding, famine or depletion in natural resources, etc; due to this lack of surplus products.

Humankind, was constantly under pressure to adapt to the changing conditions and circumstances. However, with food always in high demand we found through trial and error a stable community based on agriculture was a partial solution to the problem of obtaining a surplus in food. The introduction of agriculture meant a further division of labour with specialists and a communal store becoming an established feature of such societies.

The first settled agricultural communities would have been established by societies which had previously practised hunting and gathering and so had a communistic economic structure. This was characterised by the absence of private ownership of the means of production and by the sharing of products according to need. After the adoption of agriculture, these communistic economic arrangements survived for a while, but tended to break down in the long run as they no longer corresponded to the material conditions of production.

This was not yet the establishment of private ownership, but it meant the end of free access to the means of production that had obtained in hunter-gatherer societies. It ruled out any member of society simply helping themselves to the products of any plot of land. Normally they would only have free access to the products of the plot cultivated by the family unit to which they belonged.

The existence of a common store becomes another aspect of the society's material conditions of production and requires a social arrangement for managing this store -collecting and distributing the surpluses. The usual arrangement seems to have been to confer this responsibility on a particular family. This role of collecting and redistributing surpluses had to be filled if all the members of the community were able to meet their basic needs as of right.

The emergence of control over means of production by a section of society, or social class, was a radical departure in human social arrangements. Production was no longer controlled by society as a whole. Such societies ceased to be communities with a common interest and became divided, with one class, on the basis of its control over access to and use of the material forces of production, exploiting the productive work of the other class and allocating itself a privileged consumption.

After the rise of settled townships on an agricultural base in Mesopotamia, trade between localities developed. For the first time the products of hands and brains took on an alien life as commodities to be bartered, and then bought and sold with the abstract commodity of money. Property, released at the boundary between tribes, began to impinge within them. The first property society came to be developed when people were bought and sold as slaves.

For the sake of brevity we’ll skip the introduction of feudalism and go straight to capitalism. Capitalist social relations emerged with the expropriation of common land by the aristocracy in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The lands were enclosed to be used for sheep farming rather than arable cultivation. One reason for this was that the new Flemish woollen industry made sheep more profitable tenants than peasants. Enclosure destroyed the lives of thousands of peasant families, turning them into propertyless vagabonds.

Deprived of their land, their homes, their traditional surroundings and the protection of the law, the expropriated peasants were left to sell the one thing they possessed -their ability to work. The introduction of wage labour was the starting point of capitalism. Wage labour=profits=artificial scarcity.

With the introduction of artificial scarcity the problem of surplus production was solved by capitalism. Nonetheless, the problem of distribution still remains due to the restrictions of the profit system. In a nutshell despite the huge amounts of wealth produced by capitalism global resources can only be freed up with the introduction of common ownership.

The question of reforming the UN Security Council is a subject of ongoing debate. The Council's current composition, which reflects the power dynamics of the post-World War II era, may not fully represent the emerging global powers.

Reforms could involve expanding permanent seats to include influential countries like India, Brazil, and Japan, ensuring a more representative and inclusive Council.

Additionally, addressing the veto power held by the permanent members could be considered to enhance decision-making. Assessing the UN's impact on global order and stability is nuanced.

While the UN has played a vital role in peacekeeping and humanitarian efforts, its effectiveness can be hindered by power politics and conflicting national interests. It should undertake changes to improve efficiency, transparency, and effectiveness in addressing global challenges.

The rise of China and the relative decline of the United States will certainly affect the UN. China's growing influence may lead to shifts in power dynamics and differing perspectives on global norms and policies.

It is important for the UN to engage both China and the United States in shaping global norms and ensuring cooperation to effectively address global challenges. The extent to which these states agree on the norms promoted by the UN will depend on their respective interests and priorities.

To know more about UN Security Council:

https://brainly.com/question/97111

#SPJ11

Answer: something that draws people to a new country

Explanation: hope this helps :)

Answer: (B) something that draws people to a new country.

Explanation: EDGE 2022

Answer:

Draco Lucius Malfoy is a fictional character in J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter series. He is a student in Harry Potter's year belonging in the Slytherin house. He is frequently accompanied by his two cronies, Vincent Crabbe and Gregory Goyle, who act as henchmen

Explanation:

Answer:

not sure but heres what Google says!

Explanation:

The once proud Sioux found their free-roaming life destroyed, the buffalo gone, themselves confined to reservations dependent on Indian Agents for their existence. In a desperate attempt to return to the days of their glory, many sought salvation in a new mysticism preached by a Paiute shaman called Wovoka.

Answer:

It is established by the provisions of the Korean Armistice Agreement to serve as a buffer zone between North Korea and South Korea. The demilitarized zone (DMZ) is a border barrier that divides the Korean Peninsula roughly in half

I hope this helps you! Please mark brainliest though, if not I understand.

U.S. forces were initially sent to Lebanon to help maintain peace between warring groups, specifically to prevent the conflict between Lebanese factions backed by Syria and Israel.

What is a conflict?

A conflict refers to a disagreement or dispute between two or more parties who have incompatible goals, interests, or values. Conflicts can arise in various contexts, such as personal relationships, organizations, communities, or nations. Conflicts can be triggered by various factors, including competition for resources, power struggles, differences in beliefs, misunderstandings, or cultural clashes. Conflicts can be expressed in different ways, such as verbal arguments, physical aggression, or passive resistance. Conflicts can have negative consequences, such as emotional distress, social tension, economic losses, or physical harm. Conflicts can be managed or resolved through various strategies, such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation, depending on the nature and severity of the conflict and the willingness of the parties to cooperate.

To learn more about conflict, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14379057

#SPJ1

Answer:

he was assistant secretary of the navy under President McKinley and in 1898 helped plan the highly successful naval war against Spain.

Answer:

Someone's perspective, or point of view, is stating what the person (or people) is/are seeing or hearing. The denotation (dictionary definition) states that "the art of drawing solid objects on a two-dimensional surface so as to give the right impression of their height, width, depth, and position in relation to each other when viewed from a particular point.".

Answer:

Today, the period in Europe from about the year 500 through approximately 1500 CE is called the Middle Ages, or the medieval era (the word medieval comes from the Latin medium aevum, literally middle age). But of course people who lived at that time did not think of themselves as being in the middle of anything—they, like we, referred to their own time as “modern.” A seventeenth-century German historian, Christoph Keller, first came up with the idea of dividing history into ancient, medieval, and “new period.”

The cultural phenomenon called the Renaissance began in Italy during the fourteenth century and spread throughout much of Europe by the end of the sixteenth century. It involved a flowering of art and scholarly and philosophical pursuits, often inspired by a renewed interest in the Classical cultures of ancient Greece and Rome. Some historians of the nineteenth century saw the Renaissance as a sharp break with the medieval “dark ages,” a sudden burst of intellectual light after the supposed gloom and stagnation of the Middle Ages.

Answer:

Republican-

Won 1876 Election

Sympathized with African Americans

Upheld enforcement acts

Democrat-

Threatened a filibuster

Sympathized w/ KKK

Explanation:

Answer:

Give the person above brainliest, they deserve it!

Famines were a frequent occurrence in South Asia until 1900, and were often

devastating in impact. A series of nineteenth century famines were triggered by harvest

failure. Food procurement for World War II, combined with a crop failure, caused the

harshest famine of the twentieth century, the 1943 Bengal famine. Famine-like conditions

recurred also in 1966 and in 1972, but the extent of starvation-induced death was limited on

both occasions. Why did these episodes develop? Why did they cause death and distress on a

very large scale at times? Why did the frequency of their occurrence fall in the twentieth

century?

The world history of famines tends to approach these questions by using two keywords,

‘natural’ and ‘manmade.’ These terms are not rigorously defined anywhere, but they are

widely used as a way to analyse the causes of famines and famine intensity.2

Usually, natural refers to a large and sudden mismatch between demand for and supply

of food, caused by a harvest failure, though the disastrous effects that follow can sometimes

be attributed to a prehistory of bad diet and malnutrition. Modern famine analysts and

historians owe their conception of ‘natural’ to Thomas Malthus. Malthus used the word

‘nature’ in a wide range of senses, including the ‘natural carelessness’ with which some

populations reproduced. But one meaning is particularly relevant in this context. This

meaning is expressed in the sentence: ‘Famine [is] the last and most dreadful mode by which

nature represses a redundant population.’ In other words, famine is the inevitable result of

overpopulation.3 Using ‘Indostan’ or India as one of his examples, Malthus suggested that the

yield of land was so low here and the population ordinarily lived with so little food that the

effect of a ‘convulsion of nature’ such as a crop failure could be immediate and devastating.

Manmade now-a-days almost always refers to some sort of political action that shifts

food away from one group to another.4

It connotes state failure. The state has a particularly

important role to play because famine relief should not be priced nor withheld from anyone.

State relief often fails to be enough, it is said, because politicians believe in an ideology that

advocates weak relief, and the political system allows them to get away with it. The political

factor is especially common during wars, in despotic regimes, and during temporary

The interests of Las Vegas Sands, a global casino resort company, primarily lie in expanding their operations and increasing their profits. To meet these interests, Sands has pursued a strategy of diversifying their offerings and expanding into new markets, such as Macau and Singapore.

The Sands have also invested heavily in technology and infrastructure to improve customer experience and efficiency.
There may be potential conflicts of interests within the Sands' top management team, as they may have differing opinions on how to best pursue these interests. For example, some may prioritize expanding into new markets, while others may prioritize investing in technology and innovation. However, as a publicly traded company, Las Vegas Sands is accountable to its shareholders and is ultimately guided by the overarching goal of maximizing profitability.

To learn more about Las Vegas Sands, visit: https://brainly.com/question/28883036

#SPJ11

Answer:

The options are

A. rising sea levels

B. extinction of large animals

C. volcanic eruptions

D. climate change

E. search for better farmland

The answer is D. Climate change

The most cause of human migration out of Africa into other areas of the world is due to climate change. The climate change resulted in harsh conditions such as drought. This also led to a lack of food and water in the region thereby leading to poor living conditions in the region.

They then decide to seek better living conditions and environment by moving to other parts of the world to search for greener pastures.

The system that Nelson Mandela decided to fight against was implemented by the apartheid regime in South Africa.

Apartheid was a system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination enforced by the National Party government in South Africa from 1948 to 1994.

Under apartheid, the government enforced strict racial classification and implemented policies that separated and marginalized the non-white population, particularly Black Africans. It involved the systematic segregation of residential areas, education, healthcare, and public facilities based on race. Non-white individuals were subjected to various forms of discrimination, including limited political rights, forced removals from their homes and communities, and unequal access to resources and opportunities.

Nelson Mandela, along with other anti-apartheid activists, fought against this oppressive system through various means, including peaceful protests, civil disobedience, and underground resistance. Mandela, a prominent leader of the African National Congress (ANC), advocated for equality, human rights, and the end of apartheid.

Mandela's activism and leadership eventually led to his imprisonment for 27 years by the apartheid government. However, his perseverance and the efforts of many others contributed to international pressure and a growing movement both within and outside of South Africa that called for the dismantling of apartheid.

Ultimately, through negotiations and with Mandela's involvement, apartheid was formally abolished in the early 1990s. Mandela played a pivotal role in the transition of South Africa to a democratic and non-racial society, becoming the country's first black president in 1994.

In summary, Nelson Mandela fought against the apartheid system, which was implemented by the South African government and enforced racial segregation, discrimination, and the marginalization of non-white communities. His struggle and the efforts of others contributed to the dismantling of apartheid and the establishment of a democratic South Africa.

To learn more about apartheid regime, here:

https://brainly.com/question/16557887

#SPJ11

Complete question:

The system that mandela decided to fight was implemented by?

Answer: Albeit the Founding Fathers never planned it to be like this, partisanship and a two party framework are critical pieces of US legislative issues since they take into consideration "groups to be shaped"- - groups that can more readily get across specific thoughts and party stages to general society.  

Since there are just two significant gatherings, US residents feel that they just host a decision between one get-together or the other.  

Since there are just two significant gatherings, the gatherings will in general differ enormously on many issues, taking possibly one outrageous side of the contention or the other.  

On occasion, there have been endeavors to make a suitable outsider, yet these gatherings infrequently have sufficient help to be on an equivalent balance with the two fundamental gatherings.

Answer:

Because there are only two major parties, US citizens feel that they only have a choice between one party or the other.

Because there are only two major parties, the parties tend to disagree greatly on many issues, taking either one extreme side of the argument or the other.

At times, there have been attempts to create a viable third party, but these parties rarely have enough support to be on an equal footing with the two main parties.

Explanation:

Plato answer

Answer:

Describe some of the pros and cons of how the spanish-american war contributed to the rise of the united states as a world power.

Explanation:

PROS:

*Reasonable chance of success - Only about 3,000 US soldiers died during the war, which is a low number(spanamwar). Total size of US army was about 248,000 soldiers and volunteers. Spanish casualties were around 60,000. *Waged by a legitimate authority - one of the few times war was actually declared using the correct process. Goal of reestablishing peace - the Treaty of Paris was signed in 1898.   The US thought that the Spanish blew up the USS Maine.

CONS:

America annexed Hawaii The US army was not ready to fight in the war. They were understaffed and lacked the skill required to fight.

Answer

Medicare and Medicaid helped provide affordable medical care to the elderly and the poor, though it still lagged behind that in most other advanced countries. Thanks to those programs and Social Security, the poverty rate among the elderly, which had been the highest among all the age groups, dropped drastically. Programs like the Job Corps and Model Cities provided job training to the young people who needed it most, and the Food Stamp program was expanded to help more working people with low incomes. Poverty didn't disappear. The fact that it didn't disappear was pointed to by some politicians as evidence of the futility of these types of programs.

The argument taht is most supported is that The federal minimum wage has not kept up with inflation.

What is federal minimum wage

The federal minimum wage refers to the minimum hourly wage rate that employers are legally required to pay to most workers in the United States.

It sets a baseline wage floor intended to ensure that workers receive a fair and minimum level of compensation for their labor.

If a state or local minimum wage is higher than the federal minimum wage, employers are required to pay the higher rate.

Read more on minimum wage here https://brainly.com/question/14337883

#SPJ1

exsplain:



answer: Helpful

Answer: Based on historical analysis, it is concluded that China was helpful to the development of neighboring empires and kingdoms.

This is because China has been in existence for many years and was famous for having many products which traded with neighboring empires and kingdoms, such as silk, pottery, spices, rice, wine trade, etc.

Also, China was famous for being the inventor of many technological advancements or tools that helped make life easier during the early civilizations, such as "paper, the printing press, the compass, the water clock, etc."

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is that China was beneficial to the neighboring empires and kingdoms.

Explanation:

One contribution of overseas colonies to the allied effort during world war I was that they provided soldiers.

What exactly is World War I?

World War I, often known as the First World War or the Great War, was a global struggle that engulfed the majority of the European countries, as well as Russia, the United States, the Middle East, and other areas, between 1914 and 1918.

The Central Powers—primarily Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey—were pitted against the Allies—primarily France, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and, starting in 1917, the United States—during the conflict. The Central Powers were vanquished at the end of it. In terms of the death toll, mayhem, and destruction, the war was essentially unprecedented.

Learn more about overseas colonies with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/10808281

#SPJ4

Answer:

Because he was a person who had wide interests and was expert in several areas.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

-push factors are what made people leave their place so could be economic, political or social reasons

-pull factors are what atracted people to the new land was the prospect to live a beter life, to have a new begining, to have a more atractive place to live in

Answer:

Article Two

Explanation:

The Executive Branch of the United States at the federal level is comprised of the Presidency. The executive branch's roles, responsibilities and powers, and limitations we're exclusively defined in ARTICLE TWO of the United States Constitution.

Therefore, the correct answer, in this case, is ARTICLE TWO.

In addition, the statement was made by the former United States President Richard Nixon, a Republican.