The Oil Pollution Act (OPA) of 1990 streamlined and strengthened EPA's capacity to prevent and answer catastrophic oil spills.
The Oil Pollution Act (OPA) of 1990 streamlined and strengthened EPA's capacity to prevent and answer catastrophic oil spills. A trust store funded by an expense on oil is available to tidy up spills when the party in question is unfit or reluctant to do as such. The OPA requires oil storerooms and vessels to submit to the Federal government plans enumerating how they will answer huge discharges. EPA has published guidelines for aboveground storage spaces; the Coast Watchman has done as such for oil big haulers. The OPA likewise requires the development of Region Emergency courses of action to get ready and plan for oil spill reaction on a local scale.
The Federal Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 established pollution prevention as the public strategy of the United States. The Federal Act pronounces that pollution ought to be prevented or diminished at the source wherever practical, while pollution that can't be prevented ought to be reused in an environmentally protected way.
to know more about the Federal Pollution Prevention Act click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16804832
#SPJ4
1. there are a number of sources of american law. which source of law takes priority in the following situations, and why? answer each section separately. a.) a federal statute conflicts with the u.s. constitution. b.) a federal statute conflicts with a state constitutional provision. c.) a state statute conflicts with the common law of that state. d.) a state constitutional amendment conflicts with the u.s. constitution
The Constitution of the United States specifies the framework for the federal government of the United States as well as several civil freedoms. The explanation of the cases is given below.
The U.S. Constitution's Article VI states that the Constitution is the final legal document of the country. If challenged, unconstitutional legislation will be ruled unenforceable and not be put into effect, regardless of where it came from.
State constitutions are superseded by federal state laws.
State preemption has recently gained importance in addition to federal preemption, which is still significant. A local law that contravenes state law or, in some cases, merely deviates from it may be declared invalid under this doctrine by the state legislature.
A federal court's decision that a state's constitutional amendment must be removed from that state's constitution and declared null and void because it conflicts with the U.S. Constitution is one method a court decision can accomplish this.
To learn more about U.S. Constitution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17452390
#SPJ4
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Name the six primary sources of U.S. law."
The six primary resources of US are constitution ,statutory law, common law, administrative law, case laws ,treaties .
1. The U.S. Constitution: The Constitution serves as the supreme law of the land and provides the foundation for the legal framework in the United States. It establishes the structure of the government, defines the powers and limitations of each branch, and outlines fundamental rights and freedoms.
2. Statutory Law: Statutory law refers to laws enacted by legislative bodies, including Congress at the federal level and state legislatures at the state level. Statutes address a wide range of legal matters and cover various areas, such as criminal law, civil rights, taxation, and business regulations.
3. Common Law: Common law is derived from court decisions and judicial precedent. It consists of principles and rules developed and applied by courts over time. Common law serves as a legal framework for resolving disputes and interpreting statutes in cases where there is no specific statutory provision.
4. Administrative Law: Administrative law encompasses the rules, regulations, and decisions made by administrative agencies at the federal, state, and local levels. These agencies are empowered by the government to implement and enforce laws within their specific areas of jurisdiction.
5. Case Law: Case law refers to the body of legal principles and precedents established through court decisions. It includes the interpretations of statutes, constitutional provisions, and common law principles made by appellate and supreme courts. Case law plays a vital role in shaping legal interpretations and guiding future court decisions.
6. Treaties: Treaties are agreements entered into by the United States with other nations. They address various matters, such as trade, defense, human rights, and international cooperation. Treaties are negotiated by the executive branch and require Senate approval to become binding U.S. law.
These six primary sources collectively form the basis of U.S. law, providing a comprehensive framework for legal rights, obligations, and governance in the United States.
Learn more about agreements here
https://brainly.com/question/32062307
#SPJ11
A borrower questions the amount of the notary fee appearing on the settlement the notary agent should do what next?
Answer:
The Notary Signing Agent should: Recommend that the borrower contact the lender's representative before signing the documents.
state courts of last resort often hear cases . group of answer choices en banc with discretionary jurisdiction en banc with mandatory jurisdiction as a panel with discretionary jurisdiction as a panel with mandatory jurisdiction
State courts of last resort are the highest courts in the state judicial system. They typically have discretionary jurisdiction, meaning they have the power to choose which cases they will hear. These courts can hear cases en banc, which means the entire court will hear the case together.
This is typically reserved for cases that are of significant importance or where there is a conflict in the lower courts.
State courts of last resort may also hear cases as a panel with discretionary or mandatory jurisdiction. In a panel with discretionary jurisdiction, a smaller group of judges will hear the case and decide whether or not to grant further review by the full court. In a panel with mandatory jurisdiction, the case must be heard by a certain number of judges and cannot be dismissed without a full review.
Overall, state courts of last resort play a critical role in the state judicial system, providing the final say in important legal matters. Their ability to hear cases in different formats allows them to efficiently manage their workload while ensuring that justice is served.
To know more about State courts visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16334264
#SPJ11
How long is the prison sentence for someone who commits copyright infringement for the first time?.
According to the Act, a summary conviction carries a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a potential sentence of six months in jail if the person commits copyright infringement for the first time.
How hard is it to sue for copyright infringement?It's a challenging process, especially for independent contractors and small business owners. Even while the copyright violation may be emotionally upsetting, you should also take your financial losses into account.
According to the Copyright Act, criminal proceedings may be brought if the infringement is very severe. According to the Act, a summary conviction has a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a maximum sentence of six months in jail, whereas an indictment-based conviction carries a maximum fine of $1 million and/or a maximum sentence of five years in jail.
Learn more about Copyright Infringement here:
https://brainly.com/question/16774161
#SPJ4
The petitioner is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.
A.) True
B.) False
Answer: I believe its false
Explanation:
A jury has determined that Jason Fruitt, CPA, is 20% at fault for losses suffered by investors who relied on materially misstated financial statements. The jury found that Fruitt’s co-defendants, the client company and the company’s CEO, are each 40% at fault. The company is bankrupt, and only Pruitt and the CEO have adequate resources to pay damages.
Under joint and several liability, what is the likely percentage of damages that Fruitt will pay?
a.
20% plus a proportionate share of damages attributed to the company.
b.
20% plus 50% of damages attributed to the company.
c.
20%.
d.
100% of damages.
Under joint and several liability, the likely percentage of damages that Jason Fruitt, CPA, will pay in the given scenario is 20%. So, option C is accurate.
Joint and several liability allows for the apportionment of liability among multiple defendants in a legal case. In this case, the jury has determined that Fruitt is 20% at fault for the losses suffered by investors, while the client company and the company's CEO are each 40% at fault.
Under joint and several liability, Fruitt is responsible for paying his proportionate share of damages, which is determined as 20% based on the jury's determination of fault. Fruitt is not liable for the portion attributed to the company, as joint and several liability does not require each defendant to pay for the full extent of the damages caused by all parties involved.
Therefore, Fruitt will likely be liable to pay 20% of the damages suffered by the investors.
To know more about joint and several liability
brainly.com/question/28260185
#SPJ11
Why did EUMC believe that it was entitled to become a partner in Riverwalk II?
Answer:
EUMC reaped a substantial profit from its River-walk I investment.
Explanation:
Larry, who is deaf, purchased several items at a large chain discount store. One of the items was a large inflated doll for his daughter. Larry went to a cash register near a store entrance to pay for his goods. The doll was so large that the sales clerk could not find a bag to hold it. With the doll under his arm and his other purchases in bags held in both hands, Larry left the store. As he did so, a store employee stationed at the door to welcome people in and conduct security screens of those leaving, noticed the unbagged doll. The employee was instructed to stop and check the receipt of any party leaving the store with an unbagged item. As a consequence, she asked Larry to stop. When he did not, she shouted at him to stop. Finally, she yelled, “Stop thief,” and gave chase. Other store personnel joined in and threw Larry down onto the asphalt in the parking lot. Larry finally was able to make the store personnel understand he was deaf and that he had the receipt in his pocket. Upon seeing the receipt they let him go with apologies. Although he was embarrassed, his clothes torn, and his skin scraped, Larry accepted the apologies and left. Now he is reconsidering. Would it be ethical for Larry to bring suit against the discount store? Does Larry owe a duty to bring suit? If so, to whom and for what?
Answer from Chapter 5 Civil Law and Procedure
liability for statements made during the actual trial or hearing. Similarly, liability for defamatory statements about public officials or prominent personalities does not exist unless the statements were made with malice. That means the statement when issued was known to be false or was made with a reckless disregard for its probable falsehood. Invasion of Privacy People are entitled to keep personal matters private. This is the right to privacy. Congress has stated that the right of privacy is a personal and fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United States. Invasion of privacy is a tort defined as the uninvited intrusion into an individual s personal relationships and activities in a way likely to cause shame or mental suffering in an ordinary person. An invasion of privacy also can result from unnecessary publicity regarding personal matters. So, unlike the law regarding the tort of defamation, publication of even a true statement about someone may be an invasion of privacy. This is because, as the U.S. Supreme Court put it, you should be protected when you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Thus, two-way mirrors result of the slanderous remark. Exceptions to this occur in cases where the oral statements are to the effect that the plaintiff committed a serious crime, has a loathsome disease, or injures someone in his or her profession or business. In libel cases, you are presumed to have suffered a loss, and so these damages do not have to be shown to the court. Exceptions are made to the law of defamation in order to encourage open discussion of issues of public concern. For example, legislators statements, even those made with malice, are immune from liability if made during legislative meetings. Judges, lawyers, jurors, witnesses, and other parties in judicial proceedings are also immune from What are some situations related to the right to privacy that affect your life? BLEND IMAGES 5-2 Intentional Torts, Negligence, and Strict Liability 87
These theorists would be most interested in studying how objects (like a cop's badge or gun) play a role in impression management. Question 6 options: a) Functionalist b) Symbolic interactionist c) Feminist d) Conflict theorist
A symbolic interactionist would be most concerned with the parts these objects play in impression management. Thus, option (b) is correct.
What is management?The term “management” refers to the act of managing. The management of the business activities. Management is the basis of art, science, and the profession. Management are they manage the organization.
According to the symbolic interactionist was the concerned of objects play in impression management. The symbolic interactionist was the understanding of the human action and society.
As a result, the significance of the symbolic interactionist are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on management, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29023210
#SPJ1
The united states has many laws that prohibit the export of electronic waste to other countries. True or false?.
The statement is FALSE
Explanation:Electronic waste or e-waste in the United States refers to electronic products that have reached the end of their operable lives, and the United States is beginning to address its waste problems with regulations at a state and federal level. Used electronics are the quickest-growing source of waste and can have serious health impacts. The United States is the world leader in producing the most e-waste, followed closely by China; both countries domestically recycle and export e-waste. Only recently has the United States begun to make an effort to start regulating where e-waste goes and how it is disposed of. There is also an economic factor that has an effect on where and how e-waste is disposed of. Electronics are the primary users of precious and special metals, retrieving those metals from electronics can be viewed as important as raw metals may become more scarce.which of the following is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates?
A. No frills policy
B. Hard-hitting coreections
C. Robust rehabilitation
D. Stringent sentencing
Answer:
The answer is A. No frills policy.
Explanation:
A no-frills policy is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates. This policy typically includes restrictions on amenities and privileges, such as cable television, weightlifting equipment, and in-cell coffee pots. The goal of a no-frills policy is to create a harsh and unpleasant environment that will deter crime and make inmates less likely to re-offend.
Which of the following is NOT an example of a civil case?
a. A property dispute between two neighbors.
b. Arguing in court about the individual rights of citizens.
c. Arguing in court over the custody (ownership) of a pet.
d. Kidnapping the family dog after losing custody and fleeing to the country.
Answer:
A I think.
Explanation:
A Property Dispute Lawyer has expertise in the area of disputes surrounding property ownership and use, whereas a Conveyancing Lawyer deals with the purchase and sale of properties. Although the two can overlap, such as if there is a dispute regarding a property settlement, they are still distinct areas of law.
Of the following, turnout among young voters is likely to be highest among
black educated females
low-income male college students
young white, non-Hispanic males
non-college factory workers
Answer:
Black educated females
Which of the following statements about women’s rights is true?
Women received the right to vote with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Women received the right to vote before African Americans.
In 1920, women received the right to vote nationally through an amendment to the Constitution.
In 1920, the U.S. Supreme Court deliberated over women’s voting rights and did not reach a consensus.
Answer:
Women received the vote with little effort or opposition. Suffragists’ main strategy was the use of political cartoons. The women’s suffrage movement occurred in isolation from other social
Explanation:
The statement that is true about the rights of women is granted through an amendment in the constitution in the year 1920.
Option C is the correct answer.
What is an amendment?
The amendment is referring to changing any text or improvising it to make it more clear in the constitution of a country.
In the year 1920, there was an amendment passed that provided women the right to vote in the elections. This happened due to the suffrage movement being led by the National American Suffrage Association and its anti-suffrage activities.
Therefore, the statement described in option C is the correct answer.
Learn more about the amendment in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/8244125
#SPJ2
Arizona's laws regarding the issues in this video are similar to those in MS. If the security guard was unable to locate the stolen cellphone, do you think they should be arrested for unlawful detention or battery? What do you think should happen when private security makes this kind of mistake?
If the security guard was unable to locate the stolen cellphone, they should not be arrested for unlawful detention or battery, as it may require a search warrant and also may cause false arrest.
What drawbacks are there to hiring private security?Private security is the term for the non-governmental activity of protecting people, things, and information, conducting investigations and securing the resources of an organization. The main drawbacks of private security staff are a lack of updated training and job retention, as they are employed under contract and evaluated based on performance.
It is crucial to attempt and remember the name, badge number, or description of the security officer if you think that they have acted improperly so that you can file a complaint. You must be convinced that security personnel or security firms are either breaking the law and committing a crime or they have engaged in some other type of criminal activity before you can report them to the Security Industry Authority (SIA).
To learn more about search warrant, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29494653
#SPJ1
how did the roberts court rule in favor of business
Answer:
Explanation:
In the eight years since Chief Justice Roberts joined the court, it has allowed corporations to spend freely in elections in the Citizens United case, has shielded them from class actions and human rights suits, and has made arbitration the favored way to resolve many disputes.
What is pre-clearance? Which law was it instated under? Which Supreme Court case essentially undermined preclearance and requires congressional action to allow it to operate?
Pre-clearance refers to a process in the United States that required certain jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting practices to obtain federal approval or "pre-clearance" before making any changes to their voting laws or procedures.
The purpose of pre-clearance was to prevent discriminatory voting practices and protect the voting rights of minority communities.
The pre-clearance requirement was established under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). The VRA was a landmark federal law that aimed to overcome barriers to voting faced by African Americans and other minority groups.
The Supreme Court case that undermined pre-clearance and required congressional action to allow it to operate was Shelby County v. Holder (2013).
Learn more about Pre-clearance here:
https://brainly.com/question/31446528
#SPJ4
What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?
O A. Criminal law
B. Administrative law
O c. Procedural law
O D. Civil law
Answer:
B. Administrative law
The due process clause of the United States Constitution is specifically
stated in which amendment?
Answer:
The 5th amendment
Explanation:
The fifth amendment of the U.S. constitution states that citizens are entitled to due process
Answer:
5th Amendment!
Although elections can be very candidate-centered, for which of the following does the party organization often provide considerable support?
a) Voter data lists
b) Donor lists
c) Voter registration drives
d) Campaign funds
e) All of these are correct.
The party organization often provide considerable support to all of these Although elections can be very candidate-centered.
What does the political party do?A local party organization is a group in charge of a political party's operations at the city, county, or district levels but which is not registered as a district or local party committee with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
Which of the following is the role of a political party that is most crucial?The primary goal of political parties is to nominate and elect as many people as possible to public office. Once in office, these representatives work to advance their party's objectives through legislation and program initiatives.
What crucial roles do political parties and elections play in the government, in your opinion?In the study of politics in developing nations, particularly in the study of democratization and, more specifically, the consolidation of democratic political regimes, political parties and elections play a significant role.
Know more about voter:
brainly.com/question/21910013
#SPJ4
common law is also known as law. group of answer choices judge-made statutory public codified
Common law is judge-made law based on precedents, while statutory law is law created by legislatures through statutes or codes.
Here's a step-by-step explanation of how common law is created:
1. A legal dispute arises between two parties.
2. The case is brought before a court, and a judge hears the arguments and examines the evidence presented.
3. The judge applies existing legal principles and precedents to the case and makes a decision.
4. This decision becomes a precedent, which means that it serves as a guide for future cases with similar facts or legal issues.
5. Over time, a body of precedents is created, forming the basis of common law.
6. Judges in later cases are bound to follow the precedents set by earlier judges, unless they have a compelling reason to depart from them.
To know more about Common law visit:
brainly.com/question/543705
#SPJ11
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
What constitutes firearms and their projectiles?A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:
Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.
Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.
Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.
Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.
Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996
#SPJ1
How would you reflect and summarize your personal journey in learning leadership development skills according to the core model?
Reflecting on one's personal journey in learning leadership development skills concerns progress evaluation and growth in each of the said three components. It's pertinent to recognize achievements and areas for improvement and to continue seeking opportunities for learning and development.
What constitutes the core model?The core model of leadership development skills includes three components: self-awareness, skill development, and leadership practice.
Self-awareness means understanding your strengths and weaknesses, values and beliefs.
Skills development refers to learning and developing the specific skills and competencies required for effective leadership.
Leadership practice involves applying and improving leadership skills in real situations such as team management, project management or crisis management.
In general, reflecting on the learning journey of leadership development skills involves assessing progress and growth in each of these three components. It is important to recognize performance and areas for improvement and continue to seek opportunities for learning and development, as well as looking for opportunities for improvement.
learn more about core model of leadership development: https://brainly.com/question/30009709
#SPJ1
who is first president of united states
Answer:
george washington
Explanation:
kdjdjsjsnnsnxjd
justice department, national crime victimization survey: 2008-2012
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) conducted by the Justice Department is a comprehensive survey that gathers information on the victimization experiences of individuals and households in the United States.
The survey provides valuable data on various types of crimes, including personal and property crimes, as well as demographic information about the victims and the incidents.
The NCVS collects data over a specific period of time, in this case, from 2008 to 2012. This five-year period allows for the analysis of trends and changes in victimization rates over time. By examining the data from the NCVS during this period, researchers and policymakers can gain insights into crime patterns, identify vulnerable populations, and develop strategies to prevent and address victimization.
The NCVS covers a wide range of criminal offenses, including but not limited to assault, robbery, burglary, theft, and sexual assault. It provides important information about the nature of the crimes, the characteristics of the victims, the relationship between the victims and offenders, and the outcomes of these incidents. This data is crucial for understanding the prevalence and impact of crime in society and informing policies and programs aimed at reducing victimization and enhancing public safety.
By analyzing the NCVS data from 2008 to 2012, researchers and policymakers can examine trends in crime rates, identify factors that contribute to victimization, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and policies implemented during that period. The data can also help identify areas where additional resources and support are needed to address specific types of crimes or protect vulnerable populations.
In summary, the National Crime Victimization Survey conducted by the Justice Department from 2008 to 2012 is a valuable source of data on crime victimization experiences in the United States. The survey provides detailed information about various types of crimes, victim demographics, and incident characteristics. By analyzing this data, researchers and policymakers can gain insights into crime trends, inform policy decisions, and develop strategies to prevent victimization and enhance public safety.
Learn more about United States here
https://brainly.com/question/25899399
#SPJ11
the supreme court has gained increased power by group of answer choices frequently ruling policies created in the states conflict with the enumerated powers of congress.
The supreme court has gained increased power overruling state laws inimical with the Bill of Rights, and this expanded the authority of the national government.
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the country and the only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution expressly mandates. The number of Supreme Court Justices is not predetermined by the Constitution; rather, it is determined by Congress.
Any civil or criminal matter may be transferred at the Supreme Court's request from one State High Court to another State High Court or from one Court to another Court.
Learn more about supreme court to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
which amendment prohibits excessive bail
Write five ‘would-you-rather’ questions about life and law in early America. Please help me come up with some ideas!!
Would you rather live in a small colonial town where everyone knows each other's business, or in a bustling 18th century city where anonymity is possible?
The four Questions are seen below
What are the ‘would-you-rather’ questions?Generally, Would you rather be a wealthy plantation owner with slaves, or a poor white farmer with few opportunities for upward mobility?
Would you rather be a member of a religious minority in early America, facing persecution and discrimination, or a member of the dominant religious group?
Would you rather be a colonial woman with limited legal rights, or a Native American facing forced displacement and cultural genocide?
Would you rather be a member of a colonial militia fighting in the American Revolution, or a loyalist forced to flee to Canada after the war?
Read more about colonial town
https://brainly.com/question/13459134
#SPJ1