what does the sixth amendment guarantee to those accused of a crime? group of answer choices reasonable bail. a written indictment. right to parole assistance of counsel

Answer:true

Explanation:

Answer:b

Explanation:

Answer:

im most fascinated with the fact that they lean on people necks and choke them it is wrong and has caused deaths . I think i am intrigued by this because it is wrong and needs to change.

The poems that are chosen include "Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” and “The Charge of the Light Brigade".

Here is the question:

Now it is time to write about some of the texts you’ve read and studied! So far in this unit, you have examined the following works: “I dwell in Possibility,” “Ozymandias,” “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night,” “The Charge of the Light Brigade,” “The Battle of Blenheim,” and “War is Kind.” Select two of these poems and, in a well-developed response of at least two paragraphs, compare and contrast them.

Based on the information given, the poems that are chosen include "Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” and “The Charge of the Light Brigade".

"Do not go gentle into that good night" is a poem by Welsh poet Dylan Thomas;

In "Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night”, the speaker emphasizes that older men should fight fiercely against death. The setting is the time when the father of the speaker was approaching his death. The conflict of the poem surrounds the end of life and the resistance to death. In the poem, Thomas began with the second-person point of view.

In "The Charge of the Light Brigade", is a poem about a failed military action that involved British light cavalry. The setting was during the Crimean war. The theme is about bravery, duty, and sacrifice.

Learn more about poems on:

brainly.com/question/580141

#SPJ1

Answer:

The money in the gift card will be lost aswell if you loose it

Answer:

Good traditional Filipino values

Enumeration of Filipino values

Family orientation.

Joy and humor.

Flexibility, adaptability, and creativity.

Religious adherence.

Ability to survive.

Hard work and industriousness.

Hospitality.

Explanation: Hope that this helps!!

If the mails or other means of interstate commerce are used to offer securities, then the Securities Act of 1933 requires that the securities being offered must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), unless they are exempt from registration.

The Securities Act of 1933 is a federal law that regulates the sale of securities in the United States. Its purpose is to ensure that investors are provided with sufficient information about securities being offered for sale so they can make informed investment decisions.

The act requires companies that offer securities for sale to the public to provide detailed financial and other information about the securities, the company, and its management.

Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 prohibits the offer or sale of any security through the use of the mails or other means of interstate commerce unless a registration statement has been filed with the SEC or an exemption from registration applies.

The registration statement must contain detailed information about the securities being offered, the company, and its management, among other things.

By requiring securities to be registered with the SEC, the Securities Act of 1933 aims to ensure that investors have access to complete and accurate information about the securities they are considering purchasing. This promotes transparency and helps prevent fraudulent or misleading practices in the securities market.

To know more about Securities Act  refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/31227421

#SPJ11

Answer:

law i think

Explanation:

if not its more

Answer:

Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner (along with James Chaney) were activist who were killed by the Ku Klux Klan after talking with members of a black church that had been burned down. Emmet Till was an African American  male who was killed by Mose Wright and his half-brother J.W. Milam because he had allegedly been flirting with his wife.

Explanation:

No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.

The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.

However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.

I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.

Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.

Learn more about Procurement Law here:

https://brainly.com/question/30019470

#SPJ4

The term known as the voluntary relinquishment of a given right or privilege is waiver.

A waiver is the intentional and voluntary giving up of a right or claim, which can be done either explicitly or implicitly. It can be applied to various legal situations, such as in contracts or court proceedings, where a person agrees to give up a right or privilege they would otherwise be entitled to. For example, if someone signs a liability waiver before participating in a dangerous activity, they are waiving their right to sue for any injuries that may occur during the activity. Waivers can also be used in employment situations, where an employee may waive their right to sue their employer for certain issues in exchange for receiving certain benefits or compensation. It is important to note that a waiver must be made knowingly and voluntarily, and cannot be forced upon someone. Additionally, certain rights may not be waived, such as statutory rights or constitutional rights.

To know more about relinquishment visit:

brainly.com/question/30013641

#SPJ11

Nonaccidental physical injuries children suffer at the hands of their parents occur along a continuum that ranges from mild to severe. At the outer edges of this continuum, one might find, on the one hand, a slight swat to the buttocks, and on the other, a brutal beating. In the United States, the normative consensus appears to be that outsiders to the family are appropriately concerned only when the physical injury at issue causes serious harm; any injury short of a serious one is exclusively “family business.”Consistent with this consensus, all states’ laws permit the use of “reasonable” corporal punishment; simultaneously, they all prohibit non accidentally inflicted serious injury. The latter is generally denominated abuse, although some states classify milder but still impermissible injuries as neglect, or simply “inappropriate discipline.” Thus, being able to distinguish between reasonable corporal punishment and maltreatment—whether this is formally denominated abuse or neglect—is critical for the relevant actors: parents who use corporal punishment as a disciplinary tool, child protective services (CPS) staff who are required by statute to intervene in the family to protect children subject to or at risk of abuse, and courts adjudicating issues arising in connection with these cases. The integrity of the distinction and of the methodology employed to make it is also critical for a society that is prominently committed to both family autonomy and child welfare, and in particular to protecting the integrity of the family when it promotes (or at least does not harm) child welfare, and to intervening in the family when it fails in its related obligations.Unfortunately, few if any states have sufficiently defined the relevant terms “reasonable corporal punishment” or “maltreatment” (abuse or neglect) to consistently guide the relevant actors (those in a single system) in their exercises of discretion; nor have they established a coherent methodology for sorting injuries along the continuum of nonaccidental physical injuries. That administrative regulations and policies promulgated by state and local CPS departments often narrow agency discretion helps CPS itself to be more consistent and may help families know what to expect when they are dealing with CPS. But because appellate courts do not appear to give much deference to agency interpretations of the statutory definitions, these regulations and policies do little to guide the courts’ own exercise of discretion. Moreover, to the extent that the law in statutes and judicial opinions is either less precise or even different from the law as it is applied by CPS, the public and parents are inevitably confused or misled. As a result, decisionmaking about whether an injury or incident remains in the realm of family business or has crossed the line into the impermissible varies, reflecting a multiplicity of purely personal viewpoints, religious and political ideologies, and academic or disciplinary training and requirements. In turn, institutional treatment of and outcomes for children and families are often inconsistent. The status quo has been defended or at least explained on several grounds. The vagueness of abuse definitions has been consistently upheld on policy grounds—specifically on the argument that it is important for authorities to retain flexibility to call injuries as they see them given that, particularly in a diverse society, abuse might appear in unexpected forms.

Answer:

work no pay rule. The CFO takes the decision to withhold payments.

Answer:

A.

----

Knew this because I lived there

Answer:

Stricter enforcement of mercantilism

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Contributory negligence in a car accident says that when a pedestrian is jaywalking on the road they are violating traffick regulations.

When they get hit by a car they are not entitled to any financial compensation by the owner of the vehicle.

The person that is harmed does not get any compensation because they were negligent.

However in this scenario Dora was also driving 15 mph above the speed limit.

Since both Dora and Paul were violating traffick laws, the judge will most likely apportion a percentage of the negligence to Dora and some to Paul

There re different kinds of agreement. Because of breaking off the fire, the agreement gets void due to the fact that there was fire loss.

A void contract is known to be a kind of formal agreement that is effectively said to be illegitimate and cannot be enforced  from the time it is formed.

A contract may be said to be void if it is not enforceable as it was said to have been written. due to the fire loss, the agreement is no longer standing.

Learn more about agreements from

https://brainly.com/question/5746834

Here's the sample response:

If the first pond contains chemicals, then it will have fewer frogs because the chemicals will kill the frogs before they can lay eggs.

Here's my response that will get you a 100%:

If the first pond contains chemicals, less frogs will be present because the chemicals can destroy the frogs until they can lay eggs.

The Founding Fathers of the United States established the basic framework for the federal judiciary in the U.S. Constitution.

They created a system of courts, with the Supreme Court as the highest court in the land. The Constitution also established the principle of judicial review, which allows the courts to review the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress and state legislatures. The early Supreme Court justices, appointed by the Founding Fathers, played a key role in defining the powers of the judiciary and the relationship between the federal and state governments. Their decisions helped to establish the role of the court as an independent arbiter of the law, and their influence can still be seen in the way the court operates today.

To know more about Constitution click here:

brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ4

A taxpayer who would not be considered a material participant of an activity is: one who fails to meet the specific criteria established by the IRS for material participation.

Material participation is a key factor in determining a taxpayer's ability to deduct losses from passive activities against non-passive income.

To be considered a material participant, a taxpayer must meet one of the seven tests outlined in the Internal Revenue Code Section 469. These tests involve the level of involvement and time spent on the activity, such as spending more than 500 hours annually on the activity or being involved substantially more than any other individual.

A non-material participant would typically be a passive investor or someone who has minimal involvement in the day-to-day management or decision-making of the activity.

This type of taxpayer would not be able to deduct passive losses against non-passive income, which can impact their overall tax liability. It is essential for taxpayers to understand their participation status, as it affects their ability to claim deductions and manage their tax obligations effectively.

In summary, a taxpayer who does not meet the criteria for material participation, as defined by the IRS, would not be considered a material participant of an activity. This classification impacts their tax deductions and overall tax liability.

To know more about IRS, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30401300#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The law serves many purposes. Four principal ones are establishing standards, maintaining order, resolving disputes, and protecting liberties and rights.

Explanation:

Globalization has had a complex and multifaceted impact on women's private and political position in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.

On the one hand, it has opened up new opportunities for women to engage in global networks and access information, education, and employment. This has allowed many women to challenge traditional gender roles and gain greater autonomy in their private lives. For example, women in the MENA region are now more likely to use the internet and social media to connect with each other, advocate for their rights, and participate in political campaigns.
On the other hand, globalization has also reinforced existing patriarchal structures and power relations, particularly in the political sphere. In many countries in the MENA region, women remain underrepresented in positions of political power and face significant barriers to participation. The economic liberalization that often accompanies globalization has also led to the exploitation of women's labor, particularly in low-wage and informal sectors.
Overall, the impact of globalization on women in the MENA region is mixed. While it has brought new opportunities for empowerment and participation, it has also reinforced gender inequalities and reinforced patriarchal norms. Civil society organizations have played an important role in advocating for women's rights and challenging these inequalities, but they often face significant obstacles, including limited funding and political repression. It is important for policymakers and stakeholders to recognize and address these challenges in order to promote gender equality and women's empowerment in the MENA region.

Learn more about economic :

https://brainly.com/question/30131108

#SPJ11

Answer: C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more  favorable terms of trade.

Explanation:

Just got it right!

In order to appease both Federalists and Anti-Federalists, it was agreed at the Constitutional Convention that a group of delegates would be charged with selecting the president. This would ensure that the most capable individuals would decide which candidate would be president.

This is because the Constitutional Convention created a group of electors who would be responsible for selecting the president. These electors were selected based on their education, qualifications and abilities, and they were expected to be capable of making informed decisions about who would be best suited to serve as the president of the United States.

In addition to being responsible for electing the president, this group of electors was also responsible for selecting other elected officials, such as the vice president and members of Congress.

To know more about the the Constitutional Convention go to

https://brainly.com/question/11662939

#SPJ4