What is appeal to precedent?

Answer: True

Explanation:

"Federal Information Worksheet: Disaster Distributions—You can't file yet because Congress passed disaster tax relief laws" is not the title of the article. Instead, it is a message about federal disaster distribution when it is accessed.

This sentence probably seems because the individual endeavoring to record the Government Data Worksheet is attempting to do as such in the repercussions of a calamity, and Congress has passed debacle charge help regulations that briefly change the documenting prerequisites for people impacted by the catastrophe.

A Government Data Worksheet: Debacle Dispersions is a record used to report particular sorts of monetary help got by people and organizations impacted by a catastrophe. The worksheet is commonly used to report disseminations from calamity alleviation awards and advances, as well as different sorts of catastrophe-related help.

Learn more about disaster distributions:

https://brainly.com/question/30388695

#SPJ4

This question is not complete ,Here I am attaching the complete question:

"Federal Information Worksheet: Disaster distributions - You can't file just yet due to disaster tax relief laws passed by Congress". who wrote this article?

Answer:

The Constitution nowhere contains an express injunction to preserve the boundaries of the three broad powers it grants, nor does it expressly enjoin maintenance of a system of checks and balances. Yet, it does grant to three separate branches the powers to legislate, to execute, and to adjudicate, and it provides throughout the document the means by which each of the branches could resist the blandishments and incursions of the others. The Framers drew up our basic charter against a background rich in the theorizing of scholars and statesmen regarding the proper ordering in a system of government of conferring sufficient power to govern while withholding the ability to abridge the liberties of the governed.

Explanation:

Answer:

a. There is a contract between the band manager and the massage thereapist because the elements of a contract (mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and acceptance; adequate consideration; capacity; and legality) are fully satisfied.  However, it is a conditional contract.  The condition for executing the contract was missing as a result of the occurrence of the unforeseen event.

b. The contract was not breached.  It was frustrated because an unforeseen event occurred and prevented the contract from being performed as agreed.  The band manager can still rearrange the massages to be performed at a different time.

Explanation:

Though the massage therapist heavily discounted the rate of the massages, there is still adequate consideration because she was using the opportunity to satisfy her excitement to meet the band members while at the same time collecting some fees for her work.  A contract may be frustrated with the occurrence of an unforeseen event after the contract is entered, especially when the event is not within the control of the parties as in this case.

A lien against a parcel of real estate may result from a lawsuit currently before the court. The notice could be found by examining the public records for Lis pendens notice

A case which is currently before the court may lead to a lien against a piece of real estate. A notice of lis pendens informs prospective purchasers and creditors that a legal proceeding is ongoing that could have an impact on the title to the property. It is filed with the court and included in the public records. A litigation decision can result in the creation of a lien, which is a legal claim or encumbrance against real estate.

When a lawsuit initially begins, a notice of lis pendens is issued, and it is in effect until the matter is settled or dismissed. Any acts performed with regard to the property, such as buying or selling it, may be subject to the outcome of the litigation after a notice of lis pendens is filed, which serves as constructive notice to all parties that there is an ongoing lawsuit that may affect the property.

Read more about Lis pendens notice on:

https://brainly.com/question/14435747

#SPJ4

The case in the text hertz corp. v. friend, is an example of when a defendant can have a case removed from state court to federal court and it is based on California jurisdiction.

The main issue in the Hertz Co v friend case was filed a class action suit against their employer alleging that the rental car company had failed to conform to California's wages. The court ruled that there was California jurisdiction that was appropriate and re-established the importance of the place of operation test.

The court's conclusion holding in the Hertz Co v friend case was that it lacked diversity jurisdiction because Hertz was a California citizen whether the amount of the corporation's business activity is referred to significantly larger or predominates in one State.

Learn more about jurisdiction click on the link here:

https://brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ4

The given statement "the presence of a gun in the home triples the risk of a homicide occurring in that location." is true as it can lead to increase in homicide.

A widely read study that appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine found that having a gun in the house increased the risk of homicide, which was three times higher in gun owning households than in non gun owning households.

It is significant to note that there are a number of variables that can affect the risk of homicide associated with gun ownership including the type of gun, the owner's age, criminal history and storage methods. The majority of research however points to an increase in injury and fatality risks from firearm related incidents when there are firearms present in the home.

Learn more about homicide at:

brainly.com/question/28177539

#SPJ4

Answer: True

I am very happy to help you.

Explanation:

Answer:

it is how you characterize your self

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

Cohesion is the term that justifies the invalidation of an act, because that act has or was performed on illegal grounds. A testament cannot be an invalid claiming coercion, even if the person who issued it has dementia or another problem that impedes their abilities.

A testament represents an individual's last will and shows what he wants to happen after his death. The will is a legal document and valid in any situation.

Answer:

False

Explanation:

A creative commons-attribution is the free distribution of copyrighted work with the proper credit to the creator.

It relates to a public copyright licenses that enable the free distribution of an otherwise copyrighted work.

The practice is that a creative commons license is acquired and used when an author wants to give other people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that the author has created.

Read more about creative commons

brainly.com/question/20893085

#SPJ1

Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:

Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/14620330

#SPJ1

Under the law, Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect:d. $285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.

Ms. McCarthy had a confirmed two-night reservation at the Oracle Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts, but upon arrival, she was informed that the hotel did not have a room available for her. She had to book a stay at a nearby hotel, the Oasis, which had a higher nightly rate of $300.00. She is now claiming reimbursement from the Oracle Hotel for the full cost of her two-night stay at the Oasis ($600.00) plus the cost of her cab ride ($35.00), which would come to a total of $635.00.

Therefore, Under the law, the answer to the question of what Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect would depend on the contract between her and the Oracle Hotel, as well as the laws of the state where the hotel is located. The most accurate answer would be d. $285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.

Learn more about law form

https://brainly.com/question/820417

#SPJ1

After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.

Stealing from another person's person or immediate vicinity while using force or the threat of force with the purpose to steal aggravated robbery. The unjustifiable taking of someone else's property by using force or threatening to use force in order to instill fear.

Heists are defined as the theft of cash or valuable objects like artwork, jewellery, or silver. Under English and Welsh law, a robbery differs from a burglary in that a robbery entails the use of force which means that some of the heists commonly known as robberies were actually burglaries.

After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.

Thus, After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order.

For more details about concept of the statement, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/25976833

#SPJ2

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

I've learned this before and I know its fact

Answer:

The Criminal Defense of Mistake

In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.

Mistakes of Fact

Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.

Mistake of Law

Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.

Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:

When the law has not been published;

When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;

When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or

When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.

Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.

It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.

Mistake and Strict Liability

Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.

Textualists, such as Justice Scalia, believe in interpreting legal texts, including the Constitution and statutes, based on their plain meaning and the original intent of the authors. Textualists prioritize the language of the text itself over any extrinsic factors, such as legislative history or policy considerations.

In relation to the use of canons or "clear statement" requirements, textualists generally view them as useful tools for interpretation, but only insofar as they help illuminate the plain meaning of the text. Canons are established principles or rules that aid in the consistent interpretation of legal texts. "Clear statement" requirements refer to the idea that certain legal provisions should be explicitly and unambiguously stated in the text to have a specific effect or to change existing law.

Justice Scalia often employed canons of construction in his judicial opinions, but he was selective in their use. He would reject certain canons that he felt were incompatible with a textualist approach, especially if they appeared to prioritize policy considerations over the text's plain meaning. When applying "clear statement" requirements, Justice Scalia emphasized the need for clarity and precision in statutory language to prevent courts from making policy decisions that should be left to the legislature.

In summary, textualists like Justice Scalia consider canons and "clear statement" requirements as helpful interpretative tools, but only to the extent that they align with the primary goal of textualism: to discern the plain meaning of legal texts based on their original intent.

Learn more about Justice here:

https://brainly.com/question/9003956

#SPJ11

The best explanation for the liability of the company of the employee who got into a collision is C. It is liable because the employee was acting in his proper role as an employee and agent of the company.

In this scenario, the employee was on a business trip representing his company, driving a company-owned vehicle, and was acting within the scope of his employment. Therefore, the company can be held liable for any damages resulting from the accident, even if it was caused by the employee's driving mistake.

This is because under the legal doctrine of respondent superior, an employer is responsible for the actions of its employees when those actions are performed within the scope of employment.

Find out more on liability at https://brainly.com/question/29891068

#SPJ1

According to the information presented in this activity, the accurate statement is Democrats are more likely than Republicans to think that life circumstances explain why a person is poor (option B).

This suggests that Democrats tend to view external factors, such as the economy and social systems, as significant contributors to poverty. On the other hand, Republicans may place more emphasis on personal responsibility and hard work in determining one's economic status. It is important to note that these are general trends and individual opinions may vary within each party. Overall, the differences in beliefs can influence policy approaches and public opinion on issues related to poverty and wealth. The correct option is b.

For more about Republicans:

https://brainly.com/question/30812423

#SPJ4

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Yes because being expelled means you've been suspended already and can't go back whereas if you get suspended you can go back and you did something bad but not extremely bad.

A legal citation for a court decision is used by legal professionals to research the law, and includes: "names of the parties, location of a published case, court, & decision date."

It is a standard language that enables one author to refer to legal authorities with enough precision as well as generality that others can follow along.

Some key features regarding the legal citation are-

To know more about the judicial review, here

https://brainly.com/question/14027482

#SPJ4

Amendment refers to additions, subtraction or alterations to the constitution and are usually ratified into law after having majority of vote for the proposed provision.

An advisory vote refers to the voting done by citizen to measure their decision and views on certain matters before enacting into law.

Therefore, the State legislature will call  for an advisory vote so that to assess the common people views on the proposed amendment by the Congress.

Learn more about this here

brainly.com/question/18679443

Your home can be searched without a warrant under all of the following circumstances except if the officer has probable suspicion.

A warrant is a court order signed by a judge authorizing the police to search and seize particular materials from a specific location at a given time. To get a warrant to search a specific area for evidence of a crime, officers must demonstrate to the court, by sworn statements, that they have probable cause or a reasonable suspicion that a crime has happened.

You have the legal right to reject if the cops arrive at your residence and claim they want to check around. However, in many situations, granting access is in your best interests to avoid injury or prosecution for interfering with a police investigation.

However, you are not required to submit to a warrantless search, and you should always ask police officers for identification and an explanation of why they are at your location. If the police have a warrant, you can have it read to you.

To learn more about warrant:

https://brainly.com/question/14893433

#SPJ4

Answer:

I can provide a brief definition of each term and how it relates to American Government:

1. Supreme: Refers to the highest authority or court in the United States, the Supreme Court, which has the power to interpret the Constitution and federal laws.

2. Ordain: To establish or enact a law or regulation, often used in the context of the Constitution's preamble, which states that the document was established to "ordain and establish" the government.

3. Tranquility: Refers to the goal of maintaining peace and order within the United States, as stated in the Constitution's preamble.

4. Posterity: Refers to future generations, often used in the context of the Constitution's preamble, which states that the document was established to "secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity."

5. Statutes: Refers to laws enacted by Congress or state legislatures, which are binding and enforceable.

6. Monarchy: A form of government in which a single ruler, usually a king or queen, holds supreme power.

7. Treaties: Formal agreements between two or more countries, negotiated and ratified by the President and Senate, which have the force of law.

8. Treason: The crime of betraying one's country, often defined as levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies.

9. Preamble: The introductory statement to the Constitution, which outlines the purpose and goals of the document.

10. Interstate: Refers to commerce or travel between two or more states, which is regulated by the federal government under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

These terms are all important concepts in American Government and have been applied in various ways throughout history.

Geoff has learned a complaint has been filed against him. Due process legal rights will help him be prepared and well-represented in court.

A prerequisite of due process is that people must be treated fairly and that legal disputes must be resolved in accordance with established norms and principles. Due process is required in both criminal and civil cases.

People in nations with advanced legal systems anticipate that their constitutional rights will be upheld in a fair manner. Individuals' expectations of their local, state and federal governments are outlined in this expectation of due process, specifically that their rights won't be infringed upon.

Procedural Due Process: When the federal government takes a step that deprives a citizen of their life, liberty, or property interest, procedural due process mandates that the citizen be given notice, an opportunity to be heard, and a determination by an impartial decision-maker.

To learn more about Due process click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3689007

#SPJ4