Answers
Related Questions
A. Who does what? Read each statement and decide if it is about the House of Representatives, the
Senate, or both! Write the letter on the diagram.
The House of Representatives
A. Members represent an entire state
B. Bills about taxes and money must start here
A.
C. Approves presidential appointments
D. Members represent citizens
E. Serve two-year terms
F. Passes bills to the president to become laws
G. There are 100 members of this chamber
H. Can override a presidential veto with a 2/3
vote of support
I. Must be at least 25 to serve in this chamber
J. Led by the vice president of the U.S.
The Senate
K. Leader is called the "speaker"
Answers
Answer:
A: Senate
B: The House of Representatives
C: Senate
D: The House of Representatives
E: The House of Representatives
F: Both
G: Senate
H: Both
I: The House of Representatives
J: Senate
K: The House of Representatives
The House, according to the Constitution, represents citizens based on district populations, whereas the Senate represents citizens on an equal state basis.
What is the House of Representatives and the Senate?The United States Congress is made up of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.
Members of the House of Representatives serve two-year terms and are re-elected every even year. Senators, on the other hand, serve six-year terms, and elections to the Senate are staggered over even years, so that only about one-third of the Senate is up for reelection at any given time.
The responses to the given questions are
Senate The House of RepresentativesSenate The House of Representatives The House of RepresentativesBoth Senate Both The House of RepresentativesSenateThe House of RepresentativesTo learn more about The House of Representatives
https://brainly.com/question/747415
#SPJ2
What was the issue in the Garratt v. Dailey case?
Answers
Answer:
The Garratt v. Dailey case involved the issue of intentional tort, specifically the tort of battery. In this case, the plaintiff, Brian Garratt, alleged that the defendant, Denny Dailey, intentionally and unlawfully pulled a chair from beneath him as he was attempting to sit down, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. The main question in the case was whether the defendant's actions constituted intentional battery, even though he claimed it was an accident. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant's actions were indeed intentional and constituted battery, regardless of his intent to harm.
I believe this is your answer, I hope this helps!
at a particular crime scene the victims body is on the floor lying in a pool of blood with a knife stuck into the chest. bloody shoe print marks are everywhere. the drapes in the living room are wide open and the door to the bedroom is ajar. a table lamp is lying on the floor at the far end of the bedroom and the window is wide open. a half filled glass of water is it's on the kitchen counter. in the bathroom the tap is still running and the mirror is smashed into pieces. investigators think there is a possibility that an eyewitness was present when the perpetrator killed the victim. which four items at the crime scene are likely to have been disturbed by the eyewitness. justify your answer.
Answers
Answer:
the detective is the anwer
Explanation:
because thats the job of detective
True or False. A police officer pointing his weapon at someone is not considered
deadly force.
True
False
Answers
What are the basic fingerprint patterns?
Answers
Answer: Answer is below <3
Explanation: There are eight different kinds of fingerprint patterns, such as radiatal loop, ulnar loop, double loop, central pocket loop, plain arch, tented arch, plain whorl and accidental.
The basic fingerprint patterns are Arch, loop and the whorl.
please give brainliest if I’m correct! Tyty <33
How do I appeal a civil Judgement in PA?
Answers
You must submit an approved Notice of Appeal form, together with the Notice of Judgment that the district justice issued for each individual or business, in order to appeal the decision of a district justice.
What is the meaning of civil judgments?A court lawsuit is a final judicial decision and direction arising from a civil dispute that frequently orders one of the litigants to pay the other side a certain amount of money. Criminal investigations and prosecutions are distinct from civil litigation.
A civil judgment on a credit record is what?When a creditor successfully sues you for an unpaid debt, civil judgements are the outcome. The creditor therefore has more options for getting paid: they can now collect on past-due or unpaid debt by garnishing wages or taking money out of savings accounts or checking accounts.
To know more about Judgement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/936272
#SPJ4
Borges, Inc., a Delaware company, owns copper mines around the world. Between 2007 and 2019, the company engaged in systematic violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and numerous environmental and mine safety laws both in the United States and abroad. In June 2019, a whistleblower from the mining department contacted the New York Times, which published a story exposing the environmental and mine safety violations. The board of directors of Borges, Inc. has just hired you as an outside consultant to help them navigate through this mess. They admire the way that Siemens ultimately handled its compliance failures problems (see the readings for this Module). Please answer the following questions, making reference, of course, to what you learned about Siemens: What should the Borges, Inc. do vis-à-vis the violations that have not yet come to light? What should it do to help preserve its reputation? What should it do in order to minimize its exposure to criminal and civil sanctions?
Answers
To address the violations yet to come to light, Borges, Inc. should conduct a thorough internal investigation to identify any additional wrongdoing and take prompt corrective action.
The business should communicate its commitment to compliance, be open and honest about its findings, and interact with stakeholders to foster new levels of trust in order to protect its reputation. Borges needs to improve its compliance program, strengthen internal controls and fully cooperate with law enforcement in order to reduce its risk of facing criminal and civil penalties.
Borges should take a page from Siemens and put in place a strong compliance framework, harsh penalties for offenders and external oversight to guarantee ongoing compliance with laws and regulations. Borges can navigate the situation and reduce potential legal and reputational risks by taking these actions.
Learn more about stakeholders at:
brainly.com/question/30241824
#SPJ4
Family law is handled by which type of court?
Answers
Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
gaily cort
Explanation:
guiiiiiiiifet6jnff
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answers
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
How are medical emergencies that occur at the jail handled by Sheriff Diamond's deputies and in many
other jails across the country?
The jail maintains a full staff of doctors and nurses and has a small emergency room.
The jail does not treat prisoners who become ill in jail; they are simply moved to an isolation cell until they improve.
The jail staff will place the ill prisoner in an available deputy's vehicle and drive him or her to the nearest emergency room.
The jail has nurses on duty who are able to perform an initial evaluation of a prisoner's health and provide basic first aid, while
summoning EMTS for emergency transport to the hospital.
Answers
The medical emergencies that occur at jail handled by Sheriff Diamond deputies and in other country jails --The jail has nurses on duty who are able to perform an initial evaluation of a prisoner's health.
The nurses provide basic first aid, while summoning EMTS for emergency transport to the hospital.
Option D is correct .
What counts as a medical emergency?Sudden injury from a motor vehicle accident, burns or smoke inhalation, drowning, deep or gross wounds, or other injuries. Sudden, severe pain anywhere in the body. Sudden dizziness, weakness or blurred vision. Ingestion of toxic substances. A medical emergency is an acute injury or illness that poses an immediate threat to a person's life or long-term health and is sometimes referred to as "life or limb threatening."
Learn more about medical emergencies :
brainly.com/question/1381162
#SPJ1
Casey Martin was a golfer on the PGA Tour who, due to an illness, needed a golf cart to move around the course. After being denied permission to use a cart, Martin sued the PGA. Many of the players on the tour objected to the suggestion that Martin should be allowed to use a cart. Which of the following objections to Martin’s being allowed to use the cart is an expression of teleological reasoning?a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.” c) “The PGA is a private organization. The courts should not tell a private organization what to do.” d) (a) and (b). e) (a), (b), and (c).
Answers
Answer:
d) (a) and (b).
Explanation:
Teleology is any philosophical account of the purpose of a thing
Teological reasoning has to do with finding a reason to explain the phenomena in relation to purpose they serve instead of their causes.
From the scenario given, Martin was refused permission to use a cart to play golf due to an illness and the objections to Martin's use of the cart are a0 a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.”
Answer: A
Explanation:
Hannah is a california taxpayer. she is retired and receives a pension payment of $1,000 during 2020, and then in 2021 receives a letter from the pension administrator informing her that an internal audit of the pension computer system revealed that the administrator made a mistake and overpaid the $1,000 benefit in 2020. as such, they now want hannah to repay (the $1,000 overpayment) by writing a check back to the pension plan in 2021. under section 1341, claim of right, hannah is entitled to claim a deduction for what amount of the overpayment on her california income tax return for tax year 2021?
Answers
A. $500
B. $600
C. $1,000
D. $3,000
The above amount of the overpayment on her California income tax return for tax year 2021.
Overpayment is the act of paying more than is important or greater than the price of something, or the amount through which a person has paid an excessive amount of: Any overpayment may be handled as a charge of tax earlier. If you overpay your credit score card stability, the charge will bring about a bad account stability, which means the credit card business enterprise will owe you cash.
Income tax is an instantaneous tax that a central authority levies at the income of its citizens. The income Tax Act, 1961, mandates that the significant government collect this tax. The authorities can exchange the profits slabs and tax costs every yr in its Union finances. Income does not most effective mean money earned inside the form of revenue. Taxes levied on the income of organizations and people are referred to as earnings taxes. income concern to profits taxes can come from numerous resources, such as wages, salaries, dividends, interest, royalties, rents, playing winnings, and product income.
Learn more about Income tax here:- https://brainly.com/question/25257355
#SPJ4
what is the importance of nstp law in the youth and country?
Answers
Answer:
The primary objective of the NSTP law is to promote the role of the youth in nation-building. As such, it aims to encourage the youth to become civic and/or military leaders and volunteers whom could be called upon by the nation in cases their services are needed.
Answer:
The National Service Training Program (NSTP) Law of Republic Act 9163 is a program aimed at enhancing civic consciousness and defense preparedness in the youth by developing the ethics of service and patriotism while undergoing training in any of its three (3) program components: Civic Welfare Training Service (CWTS) ; Literacy Training Service (LTS) and Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC), especially designed to enhance the youth’s active contribution to the general welfare.
Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law. With specific references to the Law of Contract. In favor or against it. Discuss (20 marks)
Note:please the answer should be at least 800 words.
Please add references below the answer(use APA format including author's last name and year of publication, for direct quotations include the page number as well and all websites used to retrieve materials must be referenced)
Answers
Answer:
This statement is incorrect, since the theory has enormous relevance in law.
Explanation:
The law is basically a set of norms that regulates life in society, establishing guidelines for coexistence and rules of conduct that, if not complied with, have consequences that can range from simple fines to time in prison.
But unlike what the statement says, the law is composed of a theoretical component, which implies the sociological and cultural study of the law and the society to which it will apply, the consequences that it may have and its use in other societies. Without this study, the laws would be empty of content, since they would be simple rules without any basis and, therefore, very easy to be broken.
Who has the right-of-way at a four-way stop?
Answers
Answer:
If 2 or even more cars reach a 4 stop junction at the same moment, the automobile to the right seems to have the right of way after halting. Red light is flashing - It really should be interpreted as a stop sign; halt and yield to vehicles travelling in the adjoining road.
2. How do witnesses differ from the other courtroom participants? a. Witnesses can be either a professional or a nonprofessional. b. Witnesses don't need to show up to their court date. c. Witnesses are the only ones who aren't paid. d. Witnesses are the only ones without any formal legal training.
Answers
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Witnesses can be either a professional or a nonprofessional.
Explanation:
A witness is a person who has experienced an event with his own senses. Witnesses often appear in the judiciary to establish what has happened. Thus, witnesses are summoned by both the defense and the prosecution to testify in favor of each party, providing important data that are relevant to the judicial case.
In this way, the lawyers of each party cite witnesses who witnessed the events, but also others who can provide more technical data, such as doctors, technical experts (criminal, computer, psychological, etc.) who contribute their knowledge as information in the trial.
Answer:
A. Witnesses can be either a professional or a nonprofessional.
Explanation:
How do witnesses differ from the other courtroom participants?
Witnesses can be either a professional or a nonprofessional.
. Common law is judge-made law. It is the sum total of all the cases decided by Select . 2. Select two of the most important goals of common law: a. predictability b. spontaneity c. severity d. flexibility e. tenacity f. rigidity 3. Stare decisis means Select .
Answers
Answer:
Severity and Tenacity
Explanation:
Common law consists of the present day British court. The transgressions are generally based on severity and paying the right consequence.
When the father of Stephen and Chris Nuss died, the two boys, aged 15 and 12 years, began to work the family farm. While the boys were still under the age of majority, their mother, Lois, kept the books Page 727for the farm. As the boys grew older, they took more and more responsibility in running the farm. They also rented and worked additional acres of farmland. They financed these rental agreements on their own, but their mother co-signed for the arrangements. The boys also purchased additional farmland. Again, their mother helped in this purchase by co-signing. When Chris decided to leave farming, Stephen paid him $100,000, and in exchange, Chris signed over the deed to the newly purchased land. Lois was not involved in this transaction. Stephen’s farming business grew. He eventually amassed more than 1,200 acres. He and his wife, Linda, kept their own financial records and maintained their own checking account for the running of the farm. Stephen’s mother was not involved in any of this detail. However, Stephen continued to pay many of the expenses involved on the original farm, where his mother still maintained her residence. Stephen also paid the insurance, maintenance, and repair expenses on all buildings and equipment on the original farm. Because Stephen continued to farm this land, in addition to the land he had subsequently purchased, these payments were always characterized as rent. No other payments went to Stephen’s mother. When Stephen died, Linda, his widow and executor, claimed that a partnership existed and that the farm equipment on the original acreage and original acreage itself belonged to that partnership. Lois argued that no partnership between Stephen and her existed. Is Linda or Lois correct? Did a partnership exist? Explain. [See: In re Estate of Nuss, 646 N.E.2d 504 (OH).]
Answers
Which of the following is a factor that causes a change in supply?
Taxes and subsidies
Consumer income
Consumer interests/tastes
Number of consumers in the market
Answers
many people refrain from public nudity and exhibitionism for the fear of arrest and incarceration. this illustrates that the law:
Answers
The fear of arrest and incarceration serves as a form of legal punishment, which can discourage individuals from engaging in actions that are deemed inappropriate or offensive by societal norms and legal standards.
The law plays a role in shaping and influencing behavior by setting boundaries and expectations for acceptable conduct in public spaces.
It establishes rules and regulations to protect public decency, maintain social order, and uphold community standards.
By imposing penalties for violations, such as arrest and incarceration, the law aims to deter individuals from engaging in behaviors that may disrupt public peace, offend others, or violate prevailing cultural or moral norms.
The fear of legal consequences, such as arrest and incarceration, can act as a deterrent and influence people's decision-making.
It serves as a reminder of the potential negative consequences associated with certain behaviors, prompting individuals to adhere to the expectations set by the law.
However, it's important to note that the impact of the law as a deterrent can vary among individuals and different societies.
Cultural and societal factors, as well as personal values, may also play a role in influencing behavior.
While legal consequences may be a significant factor for many people, it is not the sole determinant of individual choices.
To know more about incarceration refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31917575#
#SPJ11
The police-community relations movement (PCR) developed out of the:
Answers
Answer:
Please if you want to get the answer correctly and understanding, check your question first.
THE ROAD SIGN PICTURED IS USED TO PREVENTj
Answers
why structural functionalism a major perspective on deviance and crime
-sociology
Answers
Answer:i dont know really
Explanation:
Question 1:
Alcohol is a drug that works as a _____ affects your thinking abilities.
Answers
Answer:
Depressant.
Explanation:
Alcoholism is a disease in which the body becomes dependent on ethanol. It is characterized by a constant desire to consume alcohol. There is no control over the amount of alcohol consumed, leading to multi-day drinking processes. If, for some reason, alcohol consumption is stopped (money runs out, health deteriorates), withdrawal symptoms develop - from sweating to alcohol psychosis, for example. In more severe cases, alcoholic psychosis can be fatal. There is a clear link between oxidative damage and inflammation and alcohol-related diseases such as brain dysfunction, musculoskeletal disorders, lung changes, increased severity of infections, malnutrition and cardiovascular disease or cancer.
Is it legal to go to someone’s house to peaceful confront them about a scam?
Answers
Depends on what they were scamming people with
Why is the forensic interview especially important in child abuse cases? What are key tips to ensure facts gathered in the interview can withstand judicial scrutiny and why are all forensic interviews with children recorded?
Answers
Forensic interviews are especially important in child abuse cases because it enable the acquisition of factual information and evidence relating to those cases.
To ensure that facts are gathered in a way that can be proven in court, forensic interviews are carefully controlled: the interviewer's utterances and body language must be neutral, alternative explanations for a child's assertions are thoroughly explored, and the results of the interview are substantiated in a way that can be proven in court.
What is the importance of Forensic interviews?The purpose of a forensic interview is to get a statement from a kid in a way that is objective, developmental, and legally acceptable.
Child welfare officials frequently conduct these interviews in the privacy of their automobiles or vacant classrooms. These "improved" settings, while convenient, may not be perfect.
Because a person's capacity to recall past events is often impacted by his or her environment, best practice in forensic interviewing—even if it occurs "in the field"—entails establishing a neutral, comforting, and child-friendly site prior to the interview.
Learn more about Forensic Interviews:
https://brainly.com/question/15213328
#SPJ1
Imagine you are the chief of police of your local community and have decided to
implement a community-oriented policing program. One of the issues confronting
your community is a phenomenon found in some urban communities called Stop
Snitching. Present your community-oriented policing program, including a specific
program that addresses this phenomenon. Be very specific; you are presenting this
to your department and community.
0
O
Answers
Alcohol abuse is intentional overuse.
A. True
B. False
Answers
Hope this helps you (my answer is false)
Answer:
false
Explanation:
What if parole officers had to have probable cause to search their clients' homes? What might the outcome of this change mean for law enforcement? For parolees? For prisons?
Answers
Answer:
A hook is an opening statement (which is usually the first sentence) in an essay that attempts to grab the reader's attention so that they want to read on. It can be done by using a few different types of hooks, which are a question, quote, statistic, or anecdote.
The end result of rescinding the contract is
Answers
Answer:
It is sometimes called “cancellation” or “overturning”. The word rescission comes from the word “rescind” which means to cancel or annul. The purpose of contract rescission is to restore the parties to their original status before the contract was made (the “status quo ante”).
Explanation: