Under 803(19), reputation refers to evidence of a person's or a family's character in the community, as perceived by others who have personal knowledge of them.
Rule 803(19) of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows for reputation evidence to be admissible in court if it concerns personal or family history.
This type of evidence may be introduced to establish a person's character or trait, such as honesty, integrity, or peacefulness, and is based on the opinions of members of the community who have personal knowledge of the person or family in question.
Reputation evidence can be used in both civil and criminal cases, and is considered an exception to the hearsay rule because it is not based on statements made by the person or family themselves, but rather on the opinions of others in the community.
For more questions like Federal Rule click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28592086
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an example of the second law of thermodynamics as it applies to biological reactions?.
The second law of thermodynamics states that in every energy exchange or transformation, the total entropy of the universe increases, meaning that some energy becomes unusable.
It can be expressed as “every energy transfer or transformation increases the entropy of the universe." One of the following is an example of the second law of thermodynamics as it applies to biological reactions
The second law of thermodynamics applies to biological reactions in the following manner:
Entropy - The randomization of energy is entropy. The universe's entropy is always increasing, which means that all of its reactions are becoming increasingly random and disorganized. For instance, energy is lost in biological reactions. Energy is lost in the form of heat, resulting in a lack of efficiency.
This is demonstrated by the fact that it is far more difficult to lose weight than to gain weight. When food is consumed, the energy is not lost, but instead it is converted into mass and stored. The body generates heat as a result of the conversion process.
For example, when you exercise, you sweat as your body tries to keep cool. The second law of thermodynamics is demonstrated in this case, as energy is converted and released in the form of heat.
Each energy transfer or transformation causes the universe's entropy to increase. The second law of thermodynamics applies to biological reactions in the following way:
Energy Transfer - Energy is transferred from one organism to another in biological reactions. When one organism consumes another, it obtains energy in the form of nutrients. The energy from these nutrients is converted into ATP (adenosine triphosphate), which is used by cells to function.
ATP is utilized by the cells to generate enzymes that regulate metabolic processes in the body. When an enzyme binds to a substrate, it causes a biochemical reaction to take place. The reaction that occurs is exothermic, which means that heat is produced. As a result, the second law of thermodynamics is demonstrated, as energy is transformed and released as heat.
To learn more on second law of thermodynamics:
https://brainly.com/question/30600157
#SPJ11
Who will the next president of United states?
A group of citizens is concerned about the safety of their city park at night. Their city council has limited funds, and does not want to pay for
new safety initiatives.
Which scenario is an example of how persuasion could be used to resolve this situation?
The citizens work with other community members to build a fence around the park.
The city council votes to close the park at night without meeting with the concerned citizens.
The concerned citizens present evidence at a city council meeting showing that additional lighting in parks prevents crime.
The city council agrees to consider installing a fence around the park if the citizens volunteer to form a community watch group.
The scenario is an example of The concerned citizens present evidence at a city council meeting showing that additional lighting in parks prevents crime .
Option C is correct .
Concerned citizen :A person who is a member of a country and has rights because he was born or entitled to it, or lives in a particular city.
What does it mean to be a concerned citizen?Concerned Citizens are participating members of the political community. Citizenship is obtained by fulfilling national, state, or local legal requirements. A state grants its citizens certain rights and privileges. In return, concerned citizens are expected to obey the laws of their country and defend the country against enemies.
Importance of being a concerned citizen :Being a concerned citizen of a country has many legal advantages, such as voting rights, the right to hold public office, social security, health services, public education, permanent residency, and property rights, depending on the country. Around including land, or employment.
Learn more about concerned citizen :
brainly.com/question/25656843
#SPJ1
A rule of law enabling a defendant to win even if all of plaintiff's allegations are true is a(n) _____. Select one: a. counterclaim b. affirmative defense c. deposition d. judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Answer:
d .
Explanation:
d.judgment not withstanding the verdict
Is Carry a firearm a civil right or civil liberty
the landmark 2015 supreme court case obergefell v. hodges legalized what in the united states?
Answer:
All same-sex couples the right to marry.
Explanation:
Which of the following was signed by the colonists to separate themselves politically from Britain?
Select one:
A. Declaration of Independence
B. Constitution
Answer:
By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, the 13 American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain. The Declaration summarized the colonists’ motivations for seeking independence. By declaring themselves an independent nation, the American colonists were able to confirm an official alliance with the Government of France and obtain French assistance in the war against Great Britain.
Explanation:
A court may order a(n) ______ of a written contract if the contract does not reflect the parties' actual agreement and needs to be rewritten.
Answer: reformation
Explanation:
A court may order a "reformation" of a written contract.A court may order reformation of a written contract if the contract does not reflect the parties' actual agreement and needs to be rewritten.
This can occur when there is a mistake, fraud, or other factor that has caused the contract to not accurately reflect the parties' intentions. Reformation involves rewriting the contract to better reflect the parties' actual agreement. It is important to note that reformation is only ordered in certain circumstances and is not available in all cases. A detailed explanation of the specific circumstances under which reformation may be ordered would require further research and analysis of relevant case law.
Reformation is a legal process where a court adjusts the terms of a contract to accurately reflect the parties' actual agreement, especially when the current written contract does not represent their intentions due to mistake or misrepresentation.
When the written terms of a contract fail to convey the actual agreement between the parties, a court may intervene to correct these discrepancies. Reformation is applied to fix errors or miscommunications in the contract's language so that it aligns with the true intentions of both parties. This process ensures fairness and prevents one party from taking advantage of the other due to an inaccurate contract.
To know about Reformation refer to
https://brainly.com/question/18010893
#SPJ11
evaluate to what the religious organizations have or currently supporting communities affected by human trafficking
Trafficking Prevention and Intervention Organizations
1. CAST-Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking
2. Center for Human Trafficking Awareness
3. Justice Planning Management Associates
If this helped, please give it brainliest!
the legal mechanism for evaluating the existence of an incentive or inducement for a person's promise which will establish a binding contract is called . group of answer choices consideration collusion novation reversion accord and satisfaction
The legal mechanism for evaluating the existence of an incentive or inducement for a person's promise which will establish a binding contract is called consideration.
Hence, the correct option is A.
A promise or agreement made voluntarily between two or more parties is referred to as a contract. A contract is only enforceable in court if all of the following conditions are met: the parties have reached an agreement; at least one of the parties has provided a consideration; both parties are of legal age and intend the contract to be enforceable in court; and all formalities have been followed. Consideration is an action taken by the offeree in return for the performance or failure to perform of an action that the offeror has promised. The payment of money is a common form of consideration, but it can also be a right, interest, profit, or other benefit that accrues to the offeror. The offeree must accept, or they will lose out. Without a consideration a contract is void.
Know more about " consideration" visit
brainly.com/question/13707742
#SPJ4
If a dispute between an employer and the union representing workers cannot be resolved by the standard internal grievance procedure, then most collective bargaining agreements call for the dispute to go to:a. federal district courtb. the National Labor Relations Board c. an outside labor arbitratord. the Labor-Management Resolution Board e. none of the other choicesAnswer: C
The answer is National labor Relations Board.
A national labor relations board protects the rights of private sector employees, with or without a union, so that they can improve their wages and working conditions. It's an independent federal agency.
What is the role of national labor Relations board?The Board has two principal functions under the National Labor Relations Act:
(1) The prevention of statutorily defined labor practices on the part of employers and labor organizations or the agents of either, and
(2) The conduct of secret-ballot elections among employees in appropriate collective bargaining.
This act was created in 1935 and was formed to investigate unfair labor practices. It provides fundamental rights to employees so that they can represent themselves fearlessly and fight for their own rights.
A standard internal grievance procedure is a grievance procedure, in industrial relations, through which disagreements between individual workers and management may be settled.
To know more about National labor Relations Board, click on https://brainly.com/question/13632494
#SPJ4
If Massachusetts has a sales tax of 6 percent and New Hampshire has no sales tax, how much money can be saved by buying a $1,000 television in New Hampshire? O $6 O $16 O $60 O $600
Answer:
$60
Explanation:
6 percent of 1,000 is 60
Based on the tax in both states, the amount that you would save is $60.
Purchase price of television in Massachusetts= Purchase price x ( 1 + sales tax)
= 1,000 x ( 1 + 6%)
= $1,060
Difference between price in both states.= Price in Massachusetts - Price in New Hampshire
= 1,060 - 1,000
= $60
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on sales tax at https://brainly.com/question/9437038.
5. "When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of
magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate
should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. "
In this quote from The Spirit of the Laws (1748), Montesquieu was clearly advocating for
a. Popular sovereignty
b. Separation of powers
c. Checks and balances
d. Federalism
The correct option is b. Separation of powers. In this quote, Montesquieu is arguing that when the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body of magistrates, there can be no liberty because there is a risk that they will enact tyrannical laws and execute them in a tyrannical manner.
This suggests that the separation of powers, which allows for the division of authority among different branches of government, is an important safeguard against tyranny and oppression. Montesquieu's emphasis on the importance of separation of powers has been a influential idea in the development of modern democratic systems.
Learn more about legislative
https://brainly.com/question/27698726
#SPJ4
What is a crime against property?
Arson.
Burglary.
Extortion.
Theft.
Vandalism.
Juvenile vandalism penalties.
Burglary.
The Visiting Forces Act 1952.
Do you think that OJ Simpson had time to murder his ex-wife and Ron Goldman?
Do you think interest groups help or harm the formation of U.S. foreign policy? Explain your answer in a brief paragraph.
I think an interest groups helps in the formation of U.S. foreign policy because they pursue a policy that favors the country, against the other country.
Who are called the interest groups?Also known as the pressure group, means an association of individuals usually organized on the basis of one or more shared concerns, attempts to influence public policy in its favour. They shared a desire to affect government policy to benefit themselves or their causes and their goal could be a policy that exclusively benefits group members or one segment of society.
The main techniques that the interest groups use to influence foreign policy includes by influencing the Congress, influencing the Executive Branch, influencing public opinion, direct action and corruption.
Read more about interest groups
brainly.com/question/25656843
#SPJ1
most of the $193 billion annually drained from the u.s. economy by drug use is spent on
The majority of the $193 billion annually drained from the U.S. economy by drug use is spent on healthcare costs, law enforcement, and lost productivity.
Healthcare costs arise from drug-related emergencies, hospitalizations, and treatments, as well as the prevention and rehabilitation services required to combat addiction.
Know more about the U.S. economy
https://brainly.com/question/1106682
#SPJ11
what is the most powerful majority leader in the senate ?
Answer:
There isn't stages to Majority leaders but Mitch McConnell ig.
Explanation:
which of the following is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates?
A. No frills policy
B. Hard-hitting coreections
C. Robust rehabilitation
D. Stringent sentencing
Answer:
The answer is A. No frills policy.
Explanation:
A no-frills policy is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates. This policy typically includes restrictions on amenities and privileges, such as cable television, weightlifting equipment, and in-cell coffee pots. The goal of a no-frills policy is to create a harsh and unpleasant environment that will deter crime and make inmates less likely to re-offend.
a restaurant was located on the sixth floor of a building. kim took the elevator, the type that was operated by an elevator attendant, and rode to the sixth floor intending to have lunch at the restaurant. when the elevator operator opened the door, the elevator was five inches below the floor, creating a step between the elevator and the restaurant floor. while exiting the elevator, kim struck her foot against the elevator shaft, fell, and was injured. true or false: kim should have observed the positioning of the elevator when the doors opened and before she exited; if she sues the hotel for her injuries, her own negligence will negatively impact her recovery. TRUE/FALSE
True. Kim should have observed the positioning of the elevator when the doors opened and before she exited. If she sues the hotel for her injuries, her own negligence may negatively impact her recovery.
A plaintiff must show three things in order to establish negligence as a cause of action under tort law, the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty,the defendant violated that duty by acting negligently, and the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the defendant's negligence. Under English Law, the idea of negligence came into existence. Even though English Common Law had long mandated culpability for the wrongdoings of others, it wasn't until the eighteenth century that negligence became a stand-alone cause of action. At that time, another crucial idea legal culpability for inaction emerged.
To know more about defendant's refer :
brainly.com/question/29646460
#SPJ4
Which of the following topics can citizens use their political voice to contact government officials?
a. potholes
b. immigration policy
c. nuclear-weapons agreements
d. all of the above
"Potholes", "immigration policy" , and "nuclear-weapons agreements" are topics that citizens can use their political voice to contact government officials. Option d is the correct answer.
A political voice is an individual or group's potential to influence political decisions that affect their well-being. Political voice describes a group or individual's ability to voice their opinion in government or other influential settings. It is the capability of speaking or communicating about one's needs, needs, and concerns to people or groups with the authority to address them.
In terms of policy-making and governance, the political voice of the people has a critical role to play. It helps to establish good governance and effective policymaking processes in countries, particularly democracies. Citizens can use their political voice to contact government officials on a variety of topics, including potholes, immigration policy, nuclear-weapons agreements, and others.
In a nutshell, citizens may employ their political voice to communicate with government officials on any issue that affects their well-being or concerns. As a result, the answer is d. All of the above.
You can learn more about politics at
https://brainly.com/question/30568978
#SPJ11
excluding situations where the defendant was merely a party to the murder, what is the key issue?
Excluding situations where the defendant was merely a party to the murder, the key issue is determining the level or degree of involvement in the crime.
Who are the parties to a crime?The parties to an offense can be divided into two:
Principal Offenders.Secondary Offenders.The principal offenders are the persons whose activity immediately causes the physical injury suffered by the crime victim. The principal offenders may be:
Principals in the first degreePrincipals in the second degree.The secondary offenders are the accomplices or accessories who helped or encouraged the principal offenders, and fall into two classifications:
Accessories before the factAccessories after the fact.Thus, excluding situations where the defendant was merely a party to the murder, the key issue is determining the level or degree of involvement in the crime.
Learn more about parties to a crime at https://brainly.com/question/16032473
#SPJ1
You are legal counsel to the president. One of the Supreme Court justices has just announced his resignation. Many groups and individuals are suggesting names of people they think should be nominated by the president. Write a memo to the presi- dent describing the type of person who should be nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Presidents typically pick judges who appear to share their political beliefs. To put it another way, a president who holds liberal views will typically nominate liberals to the judiciary.
What is the Supreme court of the US?“EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW" -
The supreme duty of the United States Supreme Court is summed up in these words, which are inscribed above the entrance gate to the Supreme Court Building. For all issues and conflicts arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States, the Court is the highest tribunal in the country. The Supreme Court serves as the last arbitrator of law, upholding the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans. In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's protector and interpreter.
The Chief Justice of the United States sits on the Supreme Court, together with whichever many Associate Justices Congress deems appropriate. According to 28 U. S. C. 1, there are now eight Associate Justices. The President of the United States has the authority to appoint Justices, and such decisions are made with the advice and agreement of the Senate.
Therefore, Presidents pick judges who appear to share their political beliefs. To put it another way, a president who holds liberal views will typically nominate liberals to the judiciary.
Read more about the Supreme Court, here
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ2
type of advance medical directive does the AMA recommend? Living will or Durable power of attorney
I need a definitive answer to this question, please
Answer:
Ah, easy, A durable power of attorney.
Explanation:
-Hope this helps :)
Former Major League Baseball player and radio game announcer Bob Uecker sought an injunction against Ann Ladd, alleging a six- or seven-year pattern of harassment. Ladd, who claimed to be a devoted fan, was charged with felony stalking. An injunction was issued against her bothering Uecker, but the stalking charge was dropped when she agreed to cooperate. Later, Ladd sued Uecker for defamation, claiming that Uecker defamed her in the material he filed in support of his application for the injunction. The trial court dismissed her suit, and she appealed. What do you think the outcome of her appeal was and why
Answer:
The court did not consider Ladd's appeal.
Explanation:
Quand Ladd agreed to cooperate with Uecker's claims about her disrespectful and abusive behavior towards him, she accepted that his charges were real and that they could harm her legally. Therefore, it is negligent on her part to appeal against Uecker, since she accepted his accusations. This means that the court does not accept the appeal issued, as it shows a behavior of bad faith and with exploratory characteristics.
In the court case hernandez v. Texas, the supreme court ruled that which amendment had been violated?.
The Supreme Court determined that the fourteenth amendment had been broken in the case Hernandez v. Texas.The fourteenth amendment forbids states from enacting or upholding laws that restrict US citizens’ rights or privileges, from seizing someone’s life, liberty,.
All racial and ethnic groups that experienced discrimination were covered by the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court held unanimously in Hernandez v. Texas. As a result, civil rights legislation now apply to Hispanics and all other non-white persons.The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the 1954 case Hernandez v. Texas that farm labourer Pete Hernandez’s murder conviction should be overturned because Mexican Americans were not permitted to serve on either the panel that indicted him or the jury that found him guilty.The Fourteenth Amendment covers other racial groups in communities, in addition to the two classes of white people and people of African descent within a community, if their existence can be proven through factual evidence, the Supreme Court ruled in a unanimous decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren.
To know more about Hernandez v. Texas visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29433629
#SPJ4
Many courts require mediation or arbitratrion before a case goes
to trial.
True
False
The statement "Many courts require mediation or arbitration before a case goes to trial" is true because it is becoming a common practice in many courts to mandate mediation or arbitration to be conducted before a case goes to trial.
The aim of this process is to help reduce the caseload on the courts, thereby saving them time and resources. In some instances, a judge may order parties to participate in mediation or arbitration, or they may be referred to a mediator or arbitrator by the court. In many jurisdictions, mediation or arbitration is compulsory before a lawsuit goes to trial.
This is because it helps to keep the courts less burdened and resolves disputes more quickly. Some courts have even set up court-mandated mediation programs to support parties in settling their disputes in an informal and non-threatening environment.
Arbitration, on the other hand, is more formal and follows the rules of the court. It is a cost-effective way of resolving disputes and usually results in a binding decision by the arbitrator.
Learn more about courts https://brainly.com/question/12278977
#SPJ11
How community respond to women and children in light of the bill of rights?
The way that the community responded to women and children in light of the Bill of Rights was to protect the rights of these groups in a variety of ways.
What is the Bill of Rights ?The Bill of Rights is a set of amendments to the US Constitution that outlines the fundamental rights and freedoms of American citizens.
In terms of how communities respond to women and children in light of the Bill of Rights, there are several key factors to consider. One is the right to equal protection under the law, which is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. This means that women and children are entitled to the same legal protections as any other citizen, and cannot be discriminated against on the basis of gender or age.
Find out more on the Bill of Rights at https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
The Bill of Rights, which is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, includes several provisions that protect the rights of women and children.
How does the Constitution protect the rights of individuals?The First Amendment, for example, protects free speech, which can be used to defend the rights of women and children, and the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, which can be used to protect children from abuse.
Therefore, the Bill of Rights provides a framework for protecting the rights of all individuals, including women and children, and communities can respond by working to ensure that these rights are upheld and respected.
Find out more about Bill of Rights at:
https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
A man has been sentenced to prison for armed robbery, and admits guilt for the
deed. "But", he argues, "I'll never do anything of the kind again. I'm not insane or a
danger to society. I would be happier out of jail than in. My wife depends on me for
support and she and the children would be far happier if I were able to be the family
breadwinner again. As to the influence on others, almost no one would ever know
about it; you can keep the matter out of the newspapers and no one except you will
ever know that the crime was committed. Therefore, you should release me".
Assuming he is correct, what would you do?
Answer:
sentence him to 25 to life
Explanation:
laws are laws for a reason. a line in the sand is nothing if it is not enforce. this also leads to the old saying "if you can't do the time, then don't do the crime".
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction