What made Gideon different from the thousands of other criminal defendants who had
been convicted without a criminal attorney to represent them?
Answer:
Clarence Earl Gideon was a career criminal whose actions helped change the American legal system. Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. In a landmark legal decision, Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that under the U.S. Constitution, state courts are required to appoint lawyers for those individuals accused of committing a crime who cannot pay for legal representation.
Explanation:
Because of Gideon's efforts, thousands of individuals who had been tried and convicted without legal representation were granted new trials or released from Florida prisons. Over time, the right to legal representation for impoverished individuals has been extended to include juvenile offenders and adults who commit misdemeanors.
When Clarence Earl Gideon picked up a pencil to write his petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, he set a series of events in motion that changed the nation's legal system, proving that sometimes one person can make an important difference.
Gideon, different from the thousands of other criminal defendants, as his actions helped change the American legal system.
Who was Gideon?Clarence Earl Gideon was indeed a violent offender whose acts aided in the transformation of the American justice system. Gideon has been accused of robbery, but could not afford to hire an attorney to reflect him in court.
Gideon brought his case to the United States after being convicted guilty and subjected to five years in prison.
Thousands of people who had been prosecuted and sentenced without legal counsel were permitted new trials or freed from Florida prisons as a result of Gideon's work. Over time, the right of destitute people to legal counsel has been expanded to cover young offenders and adults who commit offenses.
Clarence Earl Gideon took up a pencil to begin writing his plea to the U.S. He put in motion a chain of events that reshaped the nation's judicial system, demonstrating that one individual may occasionally make a significant difference.
Therefore, it can be concluded that Gideon helped to develop the legal system.
Learn more about Gideon here:
https://brainly.com/question/20791026
#SPJ2
T/F the most important legislation regulating food and drugs is the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act (fdca).
True. The most important legislation regulating food and drugs in the United States is the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).
The FDCA is a federal law that provides the framework for regulating the safety, effectiveness, labeling, and manufacturing of food, drugs, and cosmetics.
It grants authority to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to enforce these regulations and ensure the protection of public health.
The FDCA has been amended multiple times since its enactment in 1938 to address emerging issues and reflect advancements in technology and scientific understanding.
To know more about Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) refer here
https://brainly.com/question/30750921#
#SPJ11
Should there be an obligation to recognize same sex marriage entered into in another state which that is lawful even if the state itself constitutionally does not recognize Sam sex marriage
first,it's forbidden by religions
whats the reason of traffica laws
Answer:
The reason of traffic laws is to protect you and other people in the streets and to have a proper line of vehicles in the road to avoid accidents.
A society's ability to produced needed goods and services is permanently reduced if itMultiple choice question.all of the aboveuses resources too slowly.relies too heavily on capital production.uses resources too quickly.
The correct option from the multiple-choice question is "uses resources too quickly which depletes the stored minerals at faster rate and poses the challenge for future generation.
When a society uses resources too quickly, it depletes its finite resources at a faster rate than they can be replenished or regenerated. This leads to a decline in the availability of those resources for future use, ultimately reducing the society's ability to produce needed goods and services in the long run. Let's explore this in more detail.
Uses resources too slowly: If a society uses resources too slowly, it implies that it is not utilizing its available resources efficiently. While this may lead to inefficiencies and potential waste, it does not necessarily result in a permanent reduction of the society's ability to produce goods and services. Resources may still be available for use, albeit in a less optimized manner.
Relies too heavily on capital production: Capital production refers to the process of producing and accumulating physical assets such as buildings, machinery, and infrastructure. While capital production is crucial for economic growth and development, relying too heavily on it can have limitations. However, this factor alone does not necessarily result in a permanent reduction of a society's ability to produce goods and services. It may lead to imbalances or inefficiencies, but it can be addressed through appropriate policies and adjustments in resource allocation.
Uses resources too quickly: This option highlights a significant concern. When a society uses resources at an unsustainable rate, it depletes them faster than they can naturally replenish or regenerate. This overexploitation of resources can lead to their exhaustion, making it increasingly challenging to continue producing goods and services that rely on those resources. As a result, the society's ability to meet its needs and sustain economic growth becomes permanently diminished.
It is important for societies to strike a balance in resource usage, considering both present and future generations. Sustainable resource management practices, such as conservation, recycling, and renewable resource utilization, are vital for ensuring the long-term viability of a society's production capabilities.
To know more about sustainable usage, click here:https://brainly.com/question/12833220
#SPJ11
Sometimes, economic goals conflict with one another. Therefore, all nations must their economic goals. And each choice comes with some kind of _____.
Answer:
loss
Explanation:
The economic goals are the objectives of any nation which it desires to achieve. The economic goals of any nations includes full employment, efficiency, security, equity, stability, economic freedom and economic growth.
The economic goal are sometimes incompatible with each other. The cost of fulfilling the one set goals is having less resources to address the other sets of goals.
The economic goals conflict with one another. Every goal cannot be achieve at the same time. The choice of one goal comes with the loss of another goal.
true or false? all jurisdictions currently grant license transfers to qualified pharmacists who already are licensed by another jurisdiction.
All jurisdictions currently grant license transfers to qualified pharmacists who already are licensed by another jurisdiction. false
Generally, global legal guidelines and treaties offer agreements that nations agree to be bound to. Such agreements aren't continually hooked up or maintained. The exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction by using three principles is printed within the UN charter. Those are equality of states, territorial sovereignty and non-intervention. This increases the question of while can many states prescribe or put in force jurisdiction. The Lotus case establishes two key regulations to the prescription and enforcement of jurisdiction. The case outlines that jurisdiction is territorial and that a state might not work out its jurisdiction within the territory of every other kingdom unless there is a rule that allows this. On that same notice, states enjoy a huge measure of discretion to prescribe jurisdiction over persons, property and acts within their personal territory until there has been a rule that prohibits this.
Learn more about jurisdictions here
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
obscene material, whether or not you approve it, has been held by the supreme court to have the same first amendment protection as any other speech. please choose answer (a) if this statement is true or (b) if this statement is false
Option B is correct. The statement that Obscenity has the protection of first amendment is wrong.
About Obscenity
Any statement or action that gravely offends the prevailing morals of the moment is considered an obscenity. Its origins are unclear, but it is taken from the Latin obscnus, obscaenus, which means "boding i-ll," "dis-gusting," or "indecent." Such heavy rhetoric, such as "obscene profits" and "the obscenity of w-ar," can be used to convey great moral repugnance and fury. As a legal phrase, it typically relates to offensive language and graphic images of persons engaging in se-xual and ge-nital activities.
Obscenity concerns in the United States raise questions about restrictions on the press and speech freedoms, which are otherwise guaranteed by the 1st Amendment to the American Constitution.
To know more about Obscenity:
brainly.com/question/12176024
#SPJ4
What was the opinion of the majority decision white v. regester
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
A person who believes an agency has violated his or her userra rights may file a complaint with the veterans employment and training service in the department of.
A person who believes an agency has violated his or her userra rights may file a complaint with the veterans employment and training service in the department of the Secretary of Labor.
What is the secretary of labor department?In the United States of America, the secretary of labor is the office that is responsible for the overseeing and the management of all functions that pertains to labor in the country.
This person is one that is also in charge of the laws that are made with respect to labor in the nation.
He has to work closely with unions and other labor parastatals to take care of the issues that have to do with workers and their employees and the relationships in the workplace.
Read more on labor here :
https://brainly.com/question/881501
#SPJ1
employment law recognizes two types of sexual harassment they are
The two types of sexual harassment recognized by employment law are quid pro quo and hostile work environment. Quid pro quo harassment occurs when a person in authority, such as a supervisor or manager, offers a job benefit in exchange for sexual favors or makes employment decisions based on the submission to or rejection of such advances.
Hostile work environment harassment occurs when unwelcome sexual conduct, comments, or behaviors create an intimidating, offensive, or hostile work environment for an employee. Both types of sexual harassment are prohibited under employment law, specifically Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the United States.
To learn more about "Sexual harassment" visit: https://brainly.com/question/9647226
#SPJ11
Identify the sampling technique. Law enforcement officials stop and check the driver of every third vehicle for blood alcohol content.
Answer:
Systematic sampling technique
Explanation:
This is a systematic sampling technique. Systematic sampling has to do with the picking or choosing of all Kth members of a given population at a regular interval and it has a random starting point.
The law enforcement agents are choosing every third vehicle in the population of drivers to check for alcohol content.
Thank you!
it is far more likely for a bill to not become a law than for a bill to make it through the process to become law
true or false?
I spent all the points I had on this so please help quick
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Most bills don't make it all the way through Congress, but if they do, there is still a long process they have to follow to become a law.
two reasons why both men and women could become victims of violence
Answer: because violence isn't gendered
And also, voilence can come from both sides as well as affect both sides
Explanation:it can happen to anyone be it a man or a woman
Which statement is most true of foot patrolling? /
Answer:
is there a list of statemnts that you forgot orrrrr?
\
Explanation:
patty principal fired al agent because al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. unless patty notifies the third parties who dealt with al that he is no longer her agent, al will continue to have authority and patty will be bound by his actions.
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
The type of authority that Al will continue to have depends on the circumstances of his relationship with Patty and the way he presented himself to third parties.
First, it's important to understand that there are four types of authority in agency law: actual authority, apparent authority, implied authority, and incidental authority.
Actual authority refers to the express or implied powers that the principal grants to the agent. Apparent authority arises when the principal creates the appearance of authority in the agent's actions, even if the principal did not actually grant that authority.
Implied authority refers to the powers that are necessary or customary for the agent to carry out the principal's express or apparent instructions. Incidental authority refers to the powers that are incidental to the agent's express or implied authority.
In this case, Patty would be bound by Al's actions if he continues to act as her agent, even though she fired him. In summary, if Patty does not notify third parties that Al is no longer her agent, then Al may continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
However, if Patty properly terminates Al's actual and apparent authority, then Al will no longer be able to act on her behalf, regardless of any remaining implied or incidental authority.
For more question on "Apparent Authority" :
https://brainly.com/question/29893631
#SPJ11
Complete Question
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have __________authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
implied
incidental
actual
apparent
what is structured sentencing mandatroy?
Answer:
Felons sentenced to prison must serve 100% of their minimum term and may serve up to their maximum term if they do not work or participate in programs.
Answer: Structured sentencing is mandatory because it promotes fairness, consistency, and transparency in the criminal justice system.
Explanation: In the United States, structured sentencing is a system that was designed to replace discretionary sentencing, which gave judges wide discretion in determining criminal sentences. Under the discretionary system, sentences could vary widely depending on the judge's personal beliefs, biases, and other factors. This lack of uniformity and consistency in sentencing led to many criticisms of the criminal justice system, including claims of racial and class biases.
Structured sentencing, on the other hand, is a guidelines-based system that requires judges to follow a set of guidelines when determining a sentence. The guidelines take into account the severity of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and other relevant factors. This system ensures that similarly situated defendants are treated fairly and that the punishment fits the crime.
The mandatory aspect of structured sentencing means that judges must follow the guidelines, with limited exceptions, for all cases. This eliminates the possibility of arbitrary or capricious sentencing and ensures consistency across the criminal justice system.
In summary, structured sentencing is mandatory because it promotes fairness, consistency, and transparency in the criminal justice system. It eliminates arbitrary and biased sentencing and ensures that defendants are punished appropriately for their crimes.
Hope this helps, and have a great day!
Will mark brainlest if right
Answer:69
Explanation:6969696969
Answer:
United state of Representative.
Explanation:
I believe this because they allow Discipline and Punishment.
If wrong do not give me points (:
list and define the six general categories of crime and give an example of each.
The six general categories of crime include personal crimes (assault, murder), property crimes (theft, arson), inchoate crimes (attempted robbery, conspiracy), financial crimes (fraud, money laundering), statutory crimes (drug possession, traffic violations), and cybercrimes (hacking, phishing). These categories encompass a wide range of offenses involving harm to individuals, property, financial systems, incomplete crimes, violations of specific laws, and illegal activities conducted through digital means.
The six general categories of crime are:
Personal Crimes: These involve direct harm or threat to an individual. Examples include assault, robbery, murder, or domestic violence.Property Crimes: These crimes target someone's property or belongings. Examples include burglary, theft, arson, or vandalism.Inchoate Crimes: These are incomplete or anticipatory crimes. Examples include attempted robbery, solicitation of a crime, or conspiracy.Financial Crimes: These involve illegal activities related to money or finances. Examples include fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or identity theft.Statutory Crimes: These are offenses that violate specific laws or statutes. Examples include traffic violations, drug possession, tax evasion, or public intoxication.Cybercrimes: These crimes are committed using computer networks or digital devices. Examples include hacking, phishing, online fraud, or cyberstalking.To know more about cybercrimes refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/32375073
#SPJ11
Identify 10 religions in the world and speculate a rule peculiar to each
Answer:
Christian
Dydyducruehfydfdrr
the headright system used in virginia and carolina helped establish
The headright system in Virginia and Carolina encouraged immigration by granting land to individuals who paid for their passage.
The headright system, which was used in Virginia and Carolina, promoted immigration to the New World and assisted in establishing the first colonial settlements. Large land grants were given out under this system to people who paid for their own travel to the colonies or to people who brought indentured servants with them.
Everyone, even the family head would be given a specific amount of land as payment. This system was put in place to draw new residents, boost the colonial population and promote economic development. By enabling people to acquire land and establish their means of subsistence in the New World, the headright system significantly contributed to the growth and development of the English colonies in America.
Learn more about headright system at:
brainly.com/question/2088917
#SPJ4
James is a police officer on patrol when he witnesses a man snatch a woman’s purse from her and run away. In one paragraph describe what should be considered.
Answer:
The direction the suspect ran, visual descriptions of suspect , and if he said anything to the women
The suspect's running direction, any visual descriptions of him, and whether or not he made any comments to the women.
What is visual descriptions?Information on the visual appearance of places, things, people, and more is provided via visual descriptions. The phrase "visual description" can refer to both image and audio descriptions as well as real-time descriptions of the visual environment of a place, person, or space.
An image description gives someone with a print disability, such as the blind or visually impaired, the same or equal information that a sighted reader would obtain when they look at a picture. Alt-text and Long Description are two formats in which image descriptions can be inserted in digital content.
Thus, The suspect's running direction, any visual descriptions of him.
For more information about visual descriptions, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3399699
#SPJ2
Which style of communication should officers maintain?
1.Aggressive
2.Passive
3.Assertive
4.Passive-aggressive
if legislators want to create a law that will pass strict scrutiny, they must be certain that the law does which of the following?
If legislators want to create a law that will pass strict scrutiny, they must be certain that the law: a. Be justified by a compelling government interest.
What is a law?A law can be defined as the system of rules, principles, standards, and regulations, that are enacted (established) by legislators, adopted and enforced in a community, state, or society by the executive arm of government, in order to regulate all of the actions, behavior, conduct, and testimonies of all individuals.
What is the legislative branch?Legislative branch can be defined as one of the three branch (arm) of government that comprises legislators who are saddled with the responsibility of creating and enacting laws in a particular country.
In conclusion, a law that is justified by a compelling government interest would most likely pass strict scrutiny and be adopted as a statute and enshrined in the constitution.
Read more on law here: brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
If legislators want to create a law that will pass strict scrutiny, they must be certain that the law does which of the following?
a. Be justified by a compelling government interest
b. Be broadly tailored to meet multiple government interests
c. Be rationally related to a government interest
d. Be the most restrictive means to accomplish the goal
e. Be supported by a large majority of citizens
marlene is a law school professor speaking about the philosophy of law under the british system. which of the following legal categories is she addressing? multiple choice statutory construction historical jurisdiction jurisprudence ordinances
Marlene is law school professor speaking about philosophy of law under the British system. Jurisprudence of the following legal categories she is addressing.
What is Jurisprudence?Jurisprudence is the study of law, its philosophy, history, and the theoretical foundations that shape its practice. It seeks to understand the nature of law, how it is created, and how it operates in society. Jurisprudence examines the various theories of law, including natural law, legal positivism, and critical legal studies, and analyzes how these theories impact legal decision-making. It also considers the role of judges, the relationship between law and morality, and the ways in which law interacts with other social institutions. Jurisprudence is an interdisciplinary field that draws on philosophy, political science, sociology, and other disciplines to provide a comprehensive understanding of the law and its effects on society.
To learn more about jurisprudence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26279888
#SPJ1
What do election mean?
is a lab worker who analyzes scientific evidence considered "line" or "staff"?
Answer:
Staff
Explanation: If the member in question is working in the lab, then that means he is part of the Staff Group.
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa