The most common type of will used in California is a formal will, which is typically a formally written document prepared by an attorney.
This type of will is widely used because it provides a clear and legally binding expression of an individual's wishes regarding the distribution of their assets after their death.
A formal will in California is a comprehensive document that meets specific legal requirements to ensure its validity. It typically includes provisions such as the appointment of an executor, the designation of beneficiaries, the distribution of assets, and the nomination of guardians for minor children if applicable.
By having a formal will prepared by an attorney, individuals can ensure that their intentions are accurately reflected and that the document complies with the state's legal requirements. This helps to minimize the risk of disputes and challenges to the will's validity after the individual's passing, providing peace of mind for both the testator and their beneficiaries.
To learn more about executor , click here:
brainly.com/question/30430175
#SPJ11
Pls only put the answer nothing other than that
Why are laws important in our society? Explain.
Answer:The law is important as it serves as a guide about what is agreed in society. Without it, there will be tension between social classes and cultures. We must pursue them. The legislation makes it possible to accept improvements that exist in society.
Select the correct answer. What is the primary purpose of a political action committee?.
within the united states of America, a political action committee (p.c) is a 527 business enterprise that swimming pools campaign contributions from members and donates the budget to campaigns for or against candidates, poll projects, or the law.
Technically called "impartial expenditure-only committees," exceptional % may additionally increase unlimited sums of cash from businesses, unions, associations, and people, then spend limitless sums to overtly propose for or against political applicants.
Political hobby is interest directed towards the achievement or failure of a political celebration, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political institution. The statute incorporates severe penalties which include removal from federal employment.
Maximum personnel is loose to take part in the following types of activities: campaigning for or in opposition to applicants in partisan elections, distributing campaign fabric, organizing or dealing with political rallies or meetings, circulating nominating petitions, running to register citizens, and making marketing campaign speeches.
Learn more about political action committees here:
https://brainly.com/question/2562059
#SPJ4
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Question 7 of 20
Which
the following is an example of a violation of civil law?
A. A group of children deface property.
B. A designer hasn't been paid for her work.
C. A passenger assaults a taxi cab driver.
O D. An individual commits credit card fraud
Answer:
It’s probably
Explanation:
C
Answer: the answer is B: a designer hat hasn't been paid for her work
Explanation:
because
A: is vandalism
C: is assault or battery
D: is scamming or credit card fraud
so B is the answer
thank you for your time.
ghost out
Two equal forces act in opposite directions on object A. Two unequal forces act in opposite directions on object B. If these are the only forces acting on objects A and B.
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D
A good team member ________________. does the least amount of work possible is actively engaged in the group doesn't let anyone else participate is unreliable
Answer:
B is actively engaged in the group.
Which restriction does the U.S. government place on personal freedoms?
A. Personal freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
B. Personal freedoms must serve the U.S. government.
C. Personal freedoms can cause harm only to people in the minority.
D. Personal freedoms must contribute to the common good.
Answer:
A. Personal Freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
Explanation:
Personal freedoms can mean a ton of things, for example the 10 amendments, the bill of rights, the entire U.S Constitution.
the U.S Government decided a long time ago that it would become a superpower for democracy, which, is working, but if we consider what democracy means, what it stands as an ideology, you can say it means:
Freedom for All
You can say it's goal is to champion:
Equality For All
Going back to my first sentence, when you would like to define "Personal Freedoms" which is a vague term because it can mean almost anything, but when you look at the key word "Personal" which affects only yourself, and when it effects only yourself can it take away the freedoms of others? No.
The Idea of "Personal Freedoms" Serving the government sounds a bit Totalitarian, the freedom of a person couldn't necessarily serve the government, unless they know something we don't, but we don't have to worry about this right now, but when they say "Serving the Government" are they labelling us as, "slaves?" or "Servants?" I don't see this (B) being the answer either.
When they say said freedoms can cause harm to the minority population, which I assume is persons under the age of 18 which varies by state, what do they mean?
The Minority population being excluded & Included from certain guaranteed rights has long been debated by U.S Lawmakers, such as: the right to own a gun, (Second Amendment), the Right to own a house or drive or get a credit card and bank account, Lawmakers exclude the minority population from certain rights to protect them, because yes, this can harm them, driving, owning a gun, buying a house, getting a credit card, drinking, smoking, vaping, etc.
But Then again, these very well effect the adult population just as great as the minority population and it asked if Personal Freedoms only affect the minority population, so, this is wrong.
Lastly on to the notion that personal freedoms are REQUIRED to contribute to the common good, the common good is a vague term and can mean ANYTHING, from helping your old granny cross the street to giving to the homeless, although it's distinct definition is of affecting everyone, we can also shrink it, to one person for another, when we think about Personal Freedoms and Common Good they are just so different and Personal Freedoms don't even have to do with Common Good, unless your thinking of the civil rights protest and Women's right's protest and black lives matter and the LGBTQ+ Community, but what we have to understand is that these freedom's are guaranteed to everyone, and you are not required to use these freedoms granted to you for the common good.
That is all young one, I see you'll have a bright future as a lawyer or judge someday and If your still confused, I'm accepting comments.
- I wish for my name to not be revealed, Criminal Defense Attorney-at-Law PhD & Yale Graduate with Highest Honors.
91. When confined to bed, clients should change positions at least every two hours.
(A) True
(B) False
Answer:
Falso
Explanation:
What should an employer tell a candidate who is not selected for the position?
The employer should Inform them that he gave their job application careful consideration, but that a better match has come along.
The employer can Inform them of any compliments the recruiting team may have made on their application materials or performance during the interview.
An employee is a person who is employed by an employer to do a certain task. Employers have control over how much money employees receive, when they work, and how they work. Employees receive advantages that contractors do not in exchange. After being chosen as a candidate for employment through an application and interview procedure, the employee is hired by the company. Following the employer's determination that the applicant is the most qualified candidate for the position for which they are hiring, this candidate is chosen.
Learn more about employer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29603057
#SPJ4
which do you think is more useful: the law of cosines or the law of sines? which is easier for you to use? is it possible to always use the law of sines and never bother with the law of cosines?
In general, the law of the sign rule is probably more helpful and easier than the cosign rule.
The length of one side and the measurement of the angle opposing that particular side are necessary to solve a triangle using the law of sines. Then, you must have one more piece of data, such as an additional side length or angle measurement. However, there are times when you are provided information with two consecutive sides but the angle is not between the two consecutive sides, in which case there may be two alternative triangles that can both satisfy the given information. In order to locate the third side according to the sign rule, we would need to know the angle of the other two sides and the angle that is opposite to one of them, without which we would be unable to do so. In this approach, the law of cosigns is helpful for determining the third side of a triangle when the other two sides and their enclosed angle are known and competing with each other.
To know more about law of cosigns
brainly.com/question/22699651
#SPJ4
What source of Arizona real estate law consists of codified regulations that carry the force of the law without being laws themselves
Arizona Administrative Code is the source of Arizona real estate law consists of codified regulations that carry the force of the law without being laws themselves.
Arizona real estate law is a compendium consisting of Arizona state constitution, Arizona revised statutes and Arizona administrative code. It is published for the convenience of real estate licenses and public.
Arizona Administrative Code is the official publication of Arizona's codified rules published by Administrative Rules Division.
The state agencies, boards and commissions, are given rule making authority by the state legislature in Arizona Administrative. It consists of regulations that carry the force of laws without being laws themselves.
To learn more about Arizona real estate law here
https://brainly.com/question/4116996
#SPJ4
Question 2
State e general principles of succession in terms of onginal comary law. (10) Question 3
Evaluate the following statemen's
1.According to section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003, the recognition of traditional commurdles is conditional to complying with certain standards.
2.When the Constitution of South Africa of 1996 became effective courts of Traditional leaders were discontinued. (5)
3.In terms of African customary law, a child is not criminally liable (5)
From the question given we evaluated statements concerning the recognition of traditional communities in South Africa, the discontinuation of courts of Traditional leaders, and the criminal liability of children under African customary law.
According to section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003, what is recognition of traditional commurdles is conditional to complying with certain standards.1. The statement is correct. Section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003 provides that traditional communities must meet certain criteria to be recognized by the state. The Act specifies that traditional communities must have a distinct cultural identity, a traditional leader, and a system of governance that is recognized by the community members.
2. The statement is incorrect. The Constitution ofb recognizes traditional leadership and courts, and provides for their continued existence. Traditional leaders have a role to play in the administration of justice, and the Constitution recognizes their jurisdiction in certain areas.
3. The statement is incorrect. In terms of African customary law, a child can be held criminally liable for their actions. However, the age of criminal responsibility varies between different African countries and cultures. In South Africa, for example, children under the age of 10 cannot be held criminally liable, while children between the ages of 10 and 14 are presumed to lack criminal capacity unless it can be proved that they knew the wrongfulness of their actions.
Learn more on traditional governance here;
https://brainly.com/question/30374769
#SPJ1
Less than _____% of all bills introduced become law
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT CASE BRIEF
FIND THE FOLLOWING CASE AND BRIEF IT...
KIRKPATRICK V. ETC, INTERNATIONAL, 493 U.S. 400 (1990)
When briefing the case it needs to have a paragraph each for the facts, issues, rule, answer and the conclusion
Kirkpatrick v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., International, 493 U.S. 400 (1990) is a case that focuses on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
ETC International is a company that provides simulation and control systems to aerospace, aviation, and defense industries. In an attempt to secure a contract with the Mexican government, ETC made several payments to Mexican officials in the early 1980s. Kirkpatrick, a shareholder of ETC, sued the company, claiming that these payments were made to obtain favorable treatment and violate the FCPA.Facts:Environmental Tectonics Corp. (ETC) is a firm based in Pennsylvania that offers simulation and control systems for aviation, aerospace, and defense businesses. In the early 1980s, the company sought to secure a contract with the Mexican government and, as part of that effort, made various payments to Mexican officials. Kirkpatrick, a shareholder of ETC, filed a suit against the firm, alleging that the payments were made to secure favorable treatment and that the payments were in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).Issues:The issue at hand is whether Environmental Tectonics Corporation (ETC) made payments to Mexican officials in the early 1980s to secure a contract with the Mexican government. In addition, whether the payments were made to gain a favorable treatment or violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).Rule:The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a U.S. law enacted in 1977 that makes it unlawful for companies that trade in the United States to pay bribes to foreign officials to obtain business deals.Answer:The United States Supreme Court, in this case, ruled in favor of Environmental Tectonics Corporation (ETC) and overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals. The Court held that the FCPA did not apply to this case since the payments made by ETC were not in connection with obtaining or retaining business. The Court also held that the SEC cannot enforce the FCPA with a civil action, and only the Department of Justice (DOJ) can. Finally, the Court found that a private party has no right of action under the FCPA.In conclusion, the Court's decision in Kirkpatrick v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., International, 493 U.S. 400 (1990), clarified the scope and limits of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Although ETC made payments to Mexican officials, the Court held that the payments did not violate the FCPA because they were not made in connection with obtaining or retaining business. As a result, the Court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals and held that Kirkpatrick had no right of action under the FCPA.
To Know More about obtaining visit:
brainly.com/question/2075542
#SPJ11
WHY DO PEOPLE POST RANDOM AND DISTURBING QUESTIONS?
Answer:
could i have an example?
Explanation:
The senate refusing to ratify a treaty, the president vetoing a law, and the senate rejecting the nomination of a supreme court justice are all examples of
Answer:
checks and balances.
Explanation:
Checks and balances refers to a system that is typically used in a democratic society to enforce a balance of power between the three (3) arms of government; executive, judiciary and legislative arm. These checks and balances are really important and necessary so as to ensure there wouldn't be an abuse of power by any of arm of government.
Hence, the senate refusing to ratify a treaty, the president vetoing a law, and the senate rejecting the nomination of a supreme court justice are all examples of checks and balances.
There are three agencies with most responsibility for securing the American border: Customs, Border Patrol and Immigration. Tell me what each of these agencies responsibility are and what the corresponding agencies for Venezuela. Additionally, the US has another agency that is involved in protecting the nation's borders. I want you to use your head a little and tell me what agency this is. You don't hear much about it and it cannot operate (due to how it operates) in the North, (this is a hint for you, btw).
Answer:
In the United States, the three agencies primarily responsible for securing the American border are:
Customs and Border Protection (CBP): CBP is the largest federal law enforcement agency and operates under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It is responsible for facilitating legal trade and travel while enforcing immigration laws and protecting the borders. CBP oversees various functions, including border patrol, immigration enforcement, customs and trade, and agricultural protection.
Border Patrol: As a component of CBP, the Border Patrol focuses specifically on the prevention of illegal immigration and the detection, apprehension, and detention of individuals crossing the border unlawfully. Border Patrol agents are stationed along the U.S. borders, primarily the southern border with Mexico and the northern border with Canada.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): ICE is another agency under the DHS, responsible for enforcing federal immigration laws and investigating criminal activities related to border security, smuggling, and human trafficking. ICE conducts interior enforcement and removal operations to identify, apprehend, and deport individuals who violate immigration laws.
For Venezuela, the corresponding agencies responsible for border security would be:
Servicio Administrativo de Identificación, Migración y Extranjería (SAIME): SAIME is the administrative service responsible for identification, migration, and foreign affairs in Venezuela. It oversees passport issuance, migration control, and border management.
Guardia Nacional Bolivariana (GNB): The GNB is a branch of the Venezuelan Armed Forces responsible for maintaining public order and security within the country, including border security.
Regarding the additional U.S. agency involved in protecting the nation's borders, considering the hint provided, the agency you are referring to is likely the United States Coast Guard (USCG). The USCG operates under the Department of Homeland Security and has a crucial role in maritime border security, coastal defense, and search and rescue operations. Its jurisdiction covers coastal waters, the Great Lakes, and even international waters, where it can operate to enforce maritime laws and protect U.S. interests.
Explanation:
a dealership that fails to comply with safeguards procedures can be subject to fines _____ for each violation.
A dealership that fails to comply with safeguards procedures can be subject to fines $2500 for each violation.
A knowing infringement of the dealership results in a $2,500 common punishment for every infringement, and "every infringement" might actually be deciphered as being 1 infringement for each client. On the off chance that the vendor is sufficiently unfortunate to get a "stop and cease" letter from the FTC, they could be having to deal with extra damages up to $11,000 per infringement.
On December 9, 2021, the FTC distributed updates to the Shields Decide that add extra necessities for dealerships, some of which became viable on January 10, 2022 and the rest of which require consistence by December 9, 2022. Showrooms ought to start getting ready now to fulfill the December time constraint as the extra advances expected for consistence can't be achieved for the time being.
To know more about dealership,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/25666771
#SPJ4
Name the ways in which a court order can compel specific performance as a remedy for breach of contract?
Answer:
Specific performance is a type of equitable remedy available in a breach of contract action. It is a remedy based on the concept of fairness. Specific performance recognizes that money may not adequately compensate the non-breaching party in certain situations.
Explanation:
Give 5 solutions on how the proletariat won't be exploited?
Marxist theory holds that capitalism exploits the proletariat by requiring them to accept low wages in exchange for using the means of production that belong to the bourgeoisie, a class of landowners.
How the proletariat won't be exploited?Marx said that the bourgeoisie controlled all the power and compelled the proletariat to choose risky, low-paying employment in order to live by controlling money and the means of production.
Despite being larger, the proletariat was helpless against the bourgeoisie's will. Since the proletariat must first achieve political dominance, develop into the nation's dominant class, and establish itself as the nation, it is already national, if not in the bourgeois sense.
Because the worker no longer owns the product, which now belongs to the capitalist who bought the proletariat's labor force in return for exclusive control over the proletariat's products and all profit made by them, the worker is estranged from his or her product.
Learn more about the proletariat, here:
https://brainly.com/question/7942319
#SPJ1
Each person performing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall use a checklist that contains at least those items in the appendix of ___
Each person when performing an annual or any 100-hour inspection then there shall make use of a checklist which contains at least all items in the index or appendix of A - 14 CFR Part 43.
Each character appearing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall inspect (in which applicable) all additives of the wing and middle segment meeting for terrible wellknown condition, cloth or pores and skin deterioration, distortion, proof of failure, and lack of confidence of attachment.
Each character appearing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall inspect (in which applicable) all additives and structures that make up the whole empennage meeting for terrible wellknown condition, cloth or pores and skin deterioration, distortion, proof of failure, insecure attachment, mistaken issue set up, and mistaken issue operation. Each character appearing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall inspect (in which applicable) every hooked up miscellaneous object that isn't in any other case included with the aid of using this list for mistaken set up and mistaken operation.
Learn more about inspection visit: brainly.com/question/13262567
#SPJ4
proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in texas made what argument in support of the law?
Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in Texas claimed that it would increase voter knowledge.
Texas currently holds partisan elections for all judicial offices. However, the Texas Constitution allows for appointment by the Governor or county officials and confirmation by the Senate for interim court vacancies. The Texas constitution states that district and appellate judges will be elected by popular vote. Only a judicial candidate who has been declared the winner of a party primary is eligible to run on the official ballot in the general election, unless the candidate meets a stringent independent campaign requirement.
Learn more about constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
Many of you may remember when Target decided to allow those who identified as a different gender to use the restroom of the gender they identified with. After this decision, Target's stock prices dropped dramatically. After reading the section on The Business Judgment Rule, please tell me in your own opinion if you think a decision that devastates a stock price like this one did is a breach of the executive officer's duty to their shareholders? Explain your answer.
Answer:well its kina,hard ro explain my thought ands opinion on this but,as in diffrent genders could be a dif but not as well
Explanation:
The business judgment rule is a legal principle that gives executives and directors of a corporation a presumption of good faith and reasonableness in their business decisions, provided that they act in the best interests of the corporation and with a reasonable amount of care and diligence.
What is the business Judgement rule principle?The business judgment rule states that if a director's actions can be proven to have been taken logically, a court will not pursue them. with good intentions. knowing they were acting in a way that was advantageous to the company.
The rule recognizes that business decisions often involve risks and uncertainties and that decision-makers should be allowed to exercise their judgment without undue interference or second-guessing.
In the case of Target's decision to allow individuals to use the restroom of the gender they identify with, it can be argued that the decision was made in the best interests of the corporation, as it reflects the company's commitment to inclusivity and diversity.
While the decision did result in a drop in stock prices, it is important to note that stock prices can be affected by a variety of factors beyond the control of the executives, such as market conditions, competition, and global events. Moreover, the long-term effects of the decision on the company's reputation and customer loyalty may offset the short-term drop in stock prices.
Learn more about the business Judgement rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/31194690
#SPJ2
Subraya la opción cuya serie de palabras tiene el mismo significado. A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo b) aumentar, incrementar, disminuir, crecer, ampliar c) defender, atacar, proteger, cuidar, resguardar
Answer:
A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo
b) aumentar, incrementar, disminuir, crecer, ampliar
c) defender, atacar, proteger, cuidar, resguardar
Explanation:
A) Remoto es la única palabra que no sigue la línea de algo de hace años, antiguo y viejo. Remoto es algo que remite a lejanía pero no en el sentido del resto de las palabras. Entonces, las palabras que siguen el mismo significado son: Viejo, Antiguo, Arcaico, Añejo
B) Disminuir es la única palabra que significa lo opuesto a todo el resto. Aumentar, Incrementar, Crecer y Ampliar significan que algo aumenta o crece en tamaño, mientras disminuir es el antónimo de esas palabras.
C) Atacar es el antónimo de la serie de palabras que implican cuidado y protección, el mantener a alguien o a algo seguro. La serie de palabras iguales son: Defender, Proteger, Cuidar y Resguardar.
Does the 14th Amendment protect individual rights?
Individual rights are protected under the 14th Amendment. The phrase "all individuals born or naturalized in the United States" was expanded by the Fourteenth Amendment, which was ratified in 1868.
Additionally, it granted them citizenship as well as equal civil and legal rights. The amendment consists of five sections in total, four of which were proposed in 1866 as independent original proposals but were later joined with a fifth enforcement section to make a single amendment after being bogged down in the legislative process.
When the Fourteenth Amendment was passed in 1868, it added African Americans and former slaves who had been liberated following the American Civil War to the category of "all people born or naturalized in the United States." Additionally, it granted them citizenship as well as equal civil and legal rights. There are five portions in the amendment, four of which were first independent suggestions that were presented in 1866.
Learn more about Fourteenth Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/29371683
#SPJ4
Why is Rizal law the legal basis for the teachings of the life, works and writings of Rizal?
Explanation:
Rizal was a polymath, skilled in both science and the arts. He painted, sketched, and made sculptures and woodcarving. He was a prolific poet, essayist, and novelist whose most famous works were his two novels, Noli Me Tángere and its sequel, El filibusterismo.
what is a major concern about COMPSTATs effectiveness? -
Compstat as a policing tactic gained popularity as a result of the notable decline in crime that occurred in New York City in the 1990s.
Compstat has received a lot of attention from academics and police practitioners as an innovative management method in policing. Despite its widespread use, the scientific efficacy of the Compstat method has not received much empirical investigation. Few research has also focused on Compstat tactics used outside of New York City during the 2000s. The current study examined whether Compstat led to a noticeable increase in "broken windows" arrests (minor nuisance offenses) and, using multivariate time-series analysis, the role of the Compstat strategy in explaining changes in violent, property, and total index crimes. Compstat was used by the FWPD to analyze monthly time-series arrest and crime data over a multi-year period.
Learn more about Compstat here:
https://brainly.com/question/30022415
#SPJ11