The most significant aspect of the Patriot Act is the expanded access to personal information maintained by third parties.
What does the Patriot Act mean in plain English?The Patriot Act, a US law, grants law enforcement more power to thwart terrorist attacks. The acronym USA PATRIOT stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism."
What does the Patriot Act really do?The Act made it possible for investigators to gather data when looking into a variety of terrorist-related crimes, including the use of chemical weapons, WMD usage, executing Americans abroad, and terrorism financing.
To know more about Patriot Act visit:
brainly.com/question/13991438
#SPJ4
to prevent having multiple candidates from the same party competing with one another in a general election, political parties take which of the following actions?
Holding nomination elections prevent having multiple candidates from the same party competing with one another in a general election
Election nomination rules set forth the requirements that must be met before a candidate or political party may run for office. As opposed to active suffrage, which is the right to vote, which is the right to vote, the right to run for office is sometimes referred to as passive suffrage.
The selection of a candidate for an honour or prize, or for election to a public office, includes the nomination procedure. A short list is a selection of nominees that has been trimmed down from the full list of candidates.
To learn more about election visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/15206571
#SPJ4
Which of the following is FALSE?
parents are not always liable if they hit their children
a crown attorney is a government lawyer who tries to get accused people convicted of crimes.
most appeals fail and most cases settle
either side can reject the decision an arbitrator makes
the limitation period for most civil cases in Ontario is two years
The following statement is FALSE "parents are not always liable if they hit their children."
Regardless of the parent-child relationship, physical discipline that harms a child can be regarded as child abuse or assault in most jurisdictions. In general, the law acknowledges that parents have a responsibility to protect their children's safety and wellbeing as well as their right to be protected from physical harm.
The general idea that parents can be held liable for harming their children through physical discipline remains true, even though there may be variations in particular laws and legal defenses in different jurisdictions. Prioritizing non-violent methods of discipline is crucial as is looking for substitute techniques to control kids behavior and foster their emotional and physical wellbeing.
Learn more about parent-child relationship at:
brainly.com/question/15441200
#SPJ4
Explain how debt is actually a product that is bought and sold.
Debt is bought and sold because you produce the debt and so different offers are available in and say if you be part of their company they're going to pay off your debt, however you only get yourself into a lot of and a lot of debt with the a lot of businesses you move into with.
Debt is something owed by one person to a different person. Debt will involve real estate, money, services, or different thought. In finance, debt is a lot of narrowly outlined as cash raised through the provision of bonds. And a loan may be a kind of debt however, a lot of specifically, is an agreement during which one party lends cash to a different party.
To learn more about Debt here
brainly.com/question/11033370
#SPJ1
True or False: the creation of the chicago crime commission in 1919 was the first time the work of the criminal justice system was recognized.
False. The creation of the Chicago Crime Commission in 1919 was not the first time the work of the criminal justice system was recognized.
The creation of the Chicago Crime Commission in 1919 was not the first time the work of the criminal justice system was recognized. While the commission was an important development in addressing organized crime, the criminal justice system had been recognized and functioning long before this event. The Chicago Crime Commission is a business-led, non-partisan civic watchdog group with the mission of educating the public about the dangers posed by organized crime, particularly street gangs, organized crime, and the tools they use: drugs, weapons, public defilement, tax evasion, fraud, and betting, established in 1919. The Chicago Crime Commission is a crucial source of information for the general public, politicians, prosecutors, the judicial system, the police, and politicians. Directing examination and giving examination on wrongdoing issues, working in those organizations related to coordinated crime; and. providing a comprehensive library on organized crime.
learn more about the Chicago crime commission here
https://brainly.com/question/29514717
#SPJ11
The case: Sixteen-year-old Terry was in a bedroom at his family's home with his younger brother when he pulled a handgun from underneath the mattress. Terry was allegedly pointing the gun at his brother when it fired. The bullet struck his brother, killing him. Terry had gotten the .380-caliber semi-automatic handgun by trading a 9mm Glock he had stolen from his father. The police say they believe the shooting was not intentional.
Answer: Involuntary Manslaughter
Explanation:
It is believed that Terry did not intentionally commit a crime. Intent would have resulted in a murder case. Murder, whether or not it is premeditated or unpremeditated, is intentional. The difference with manslaughter is that: voluntary manslaughter, while requiring intent, also involves a circumstance in which a reasonable person becomes emotionally disturbed and fueled by passion or impulse rather than judgement. Involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing that results from criminal negligence or recklessness. (no intent or heat of passion).
Elements of crime committed:
Actus Reus and the element of harm come into play with Terry's case. Because there wasn't causation for his brother's death, the intent element isn't present. Terry has no guilty state of mind.
What are some of the contemporary issues that present a challenge to the labour and workplace environment?
Some contemporary issues that present challenges to the labor and workplace environment include automation, globalization, workplace diversity and inclusion, technological advancements, and addressing work-life balance.
In the contemporary labor and workplace environment, several challenges are shaping the way we work and creating significant implications. One major issue is automation and technological advancements. As artificial intelligence and automation technologies continue to evolve, there is a concern that many jobs could be replaced, leading to unemployment and income inequality.
Another challenge is the rise of the gig economy and the increasing prevalence of non-traditional work arrangements. This shift towards freelance and temporary employment can result in limited job security, lack of benefits, and limited worker protections. Additionally, issues related to worker rights and fair wages persist, with many workers advocating for better working conditions, higher minimum wages, and protection against exploitative practices.
The COVID-19 pandemic has also highlighted the need for flexible work arrangements and remote work options. The rapid shift to remote work has posed challenges in terms of work-life balance, mental health, and maintaining productivity.
Moreover, diversity and inclusion have emerged as critical concerns. Organizations are recognizing the importance of creating inclusive workplaces that value and respect individuals from diverse backgrounds and experiences.
Overall, these contemporary challenges require proactive measures to ensure a fair and sustainable labor and workplace environment, including policy changes, upskilling and reskilling initiatives, and greater emphasis on worker well-being.
For such question on globalization
https://brainly.com/question/3715941
#SPJ11
what is the juditial system
Answer:
The judiciary is the system of courts that interprets, defends, and applies the law in the name of the state. The judiciary can also be thought of as the mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the judiciary generally does not make statutory law (which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce law (which is the responsibility of the executive), but rather interprets, defends, and applies the law to the facts of each case. However, in some countries the judiciary does make common law.
In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. Courts with judicial review power may annul the laws and rules of the state when it finds them incompatible with a higher norm, such as primary legislation, the provisions of the constitution, treaties or international law. Judges constitute a critical force for interpretation and implementation of a constitution, thus in common law countries creating the body of constitutional law.
Explanation:
Answer:
The judicial system, aka branch, decides on how laws will help the citizens in real life situations, and whether or not it will break the Constitution.
Explanation:
pls mark brainiest and hope you have a great day! ;)
Which of the following actions is illegal for selling alcohol
Answer:
no options
Explanation:
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
Please help me to answer this
Answer:
Tomy is not reliable due to unforeseen circumstances.
Explanation:
Less than _____% of all bills introduced become law
ANY COLLEGE STUDENT KNOW HOW EXAMITY WORKS?
Answer:
chill with the caps and uhh no
Explanation:
Is poverty or a hard life ever an excuse for a crime? If so, how? If not, why not?
Answer:
Poverty does not directly cause crime; instead, it is a factor in the cause but, independently, it is not the root source (Barr 5). During the Great Depression, poverty levels were much higher than they are today, but crime actually declined
What is the historical background of privatisation?
Answer:
The first mass privatization of state property occurred in Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1937: "It is a fact that the government of the National Socialist Party sold off public ownership in several state-owned firms in the middle of the 1930s.
Explanation:
In the case in the text, Pena v. Fox, the court held that the release delivered constituted a(n):
counteroffer because the release did not mirror Pena’s offer.
counteroffer because the release contained a different settlement amount.
acceptance because the additional terms were not material.
acceptance because the release mirrored Pena’s offer.
Based on the information provided, the correct answer is: acceptance because the release mirrored Pena's offer.
In the case Pena v. Fox, the court determined that the release delivered by one party (presumably Fox) constituted an acceptance of the offer made by the other party (presumably Pena) because the release mirrored Pena's offer. This means that the terms and conditions stated in the release were identical or very similar to the terms proposed by Pena. Therefore, the court held that it was an acceptance of the original offer rather than a counteroffer.The other options mentioned in your question are not applicable to this specific case based on the information provided.
To learn more about counteroffer, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/27901496
#SPJ11
federalist 39 if the plan of the convention, therefore, be found to depart from the republican character, its advocates must abandon it as no longer defensible
In Federalist 39, Alexander Hamilton argues that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government.
What does Federalist 39 say ?Hamilton acknowledges that the Constitution does not create a pure democracy, in which all laws are made directly by the people. However, he argues that this is not necessary for a government to be considered a republic. He points out that even in a pure democracy, the people must delegate some of their power to representatives.
Hamilton concludes that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government and that its advocates should not abandon it simply because it is not a pure democracy. He defines a republic as "a government in which the scheme of representation takes place."
Find out more on the Federalist papers at https://brainly.com/question/233891
#SPJ4
The ______ enforces federal environmental statutes, while _______ enforces workplace safety regulations.
Answer: EPA, OSHA
Explanation:
Who is Eilyn González
Answer:
Eileen is a 51 Pegasi b Fellow at the Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Sciences. She uses observational and theoretical techniques to understand the atmospheres of low-mass stars, brown dwarfs and directly-imaged exoplanets.
Explanation:
There are
colors used to produce seven different types of traffic signs,
a) 7
b) 8
c) 9
d) 10
Answer:a 7
Explanation:
The correct statement will be that there are seven different types of colors used to denote the different types of traffic signs. So, the correct option that matches the statement above is A.
The seven different colors used are the colors which are primary in nature as they are considered to be the brightest colors and help the drivers and people on roads to identify the traffic conditions.
The main three colors used for denoting the traffic signals are Red, Yellow and Green where Green signs to commute, Yellow denotes to turn on the ignition and the red denotes to stop at the signal.However there are four other colors out of the colors of the rainbow that are used for denoting different signals of the traffics. The other four colors being Violet, Indigo, Blue and Orange.The reason that these colors are used to denote the traffic signs is because these colors travel the farthest and enable the drivers to identify the traffic sign from a further distance.Hence, the correct option is A that there are seven different colors used to denote the different types of traffic signs.
To know more about traffic signs, click the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/4729352
the statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is typically set by individual provinces or territories within their respective legal frameworks.
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges varies depending on the specific charge and the province in which it is being laid. Generally, the limitations range from one to five years, but some charges may have longer limitations or none at all. For example, in Ontario, the limitation period for most provincial offences is one year from the time the offence was committed, while in British Columbia, the limitation period is generally two years. However, some charges, such as sexual assault and murder, have no limitation period and can be laid at any time. It is important to note that the statute of limitations does not apply to all offences, and some charges may be laid even after the limitation period has expired if certain conditions are met.
To know more about provincial visit:
brainly.com/question/31273238
#SPJ11
what is my life about?
Answer:
Living life with others?
Explanation:
since you’re the ✨ sadie sink ✨ you are an actress! You’re really famous for being on popular tv show called “stranger things” and you play max! You’re bestfriends with milliebobbybrown!
The function of legal language, i need a good explanation on its conative and metalinguistic function
Legal language has a conative function of directing behavior and a metalinguistic function of defining legal concepts and terms.
What is the Function of Legal Language?Legal language serves a conative function by directing and influencing behavior. Its precise and formal structure provides clear instructions, defining rights, obligations, and consequences.
Additionally, legal language serves a metalinguistic function by defining and clarifying legal concepts and terms. It establishes a specialized vocabulary and syntax that enables effective communication within the legal profession and helps ensure accurate interpretation and application of laws.
Learn more about Function of Legal Language on:
https://brainly.com/question/2777418
#SPJ4
how a federal bill becomes a law. These cartoons are out of order. Number the cartoon panels from 1 to 12 in the correct order of how a bill passes through Congress. The last step of how a bill becomes a law is number for you. HELP URGENT I NEED THE ANSWER NOW I WILL GIVE MAX AMOUT OF POINT ‼️‼️‼️‼️
Answer:
please your questions cannot be viewed
The police investigate Eric in connection with a double homicide. Prior to Eric's trial, the police use an unnece ecessarily suggestive police procedure-a poorly designed lineup-to get a witness to identify Eric as the killer. Under which circumstances will the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment compel the exclusion of this identification evidence? a. If there is a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification
b. If a judge was not present for the lineup procedure that identified Eric as the killer
c. None of the answer choices are correct d. If the police acted improperly when they constructed the lineup
Answer:
C
Explanation:
For a former convict, the lifetime effects of incarceration can negatively impact _____.
job availability
credit worthiness
lifetime earnings
marriage
Answer:
job availability
Explanation:
many people that went in prison have difficulty finding Employment and the majority 70% felt that criminal records have effect on their job search 2 months of the been released 40% of respondents have been employed at some point since leaving prison but only 31% were currently employed.
one study found that that white job applicants with a criminal record are of half likely to be called back for an interview black applicants are less likely to be called back in general but those with a record called back on your third as often as peers.
also background checks go back 7 years different type of background checks look different results and cover different lengths of time in Canadian personal history in general background checks that typically cover 7 years of Criminal and court records but can't go back any further depending on complication and laws of what's been searched.
Answer:
job availabolty
Explanation:
trust am a Hardvard student
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
I need help please.
Answer:
what was last week's lesson?
Answer: try and explain why u learned in this weeks lesson and write it down and write about what u thing it’s surprising
Explanation:
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Looking back at history, women often had very different protection under men, depending on which government ruled. Based on the origins of human right below, did it apply to women? Explain why and how in 150 to 200 words.
Women often had very different protection from men, they are dependent on their husbands as well as fathers before marriage, and their influence was limited to the boundaries of the home.
What is a human right?Human rights are some of the rights which are provided to every human despite of any discrimination based on age, gender, caste or religion. These rights include the right to have property, the right to freedom, and the right to express.
Historians speculate that Mycenae or Crete may have had matriarchal societies throughout the Bronze Age. Only the 18th century, with the beginning of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution, can be used to discuss the claim of the rights of women.
Learn more about women, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3451600
#SPJ1
16.
The Founding Fathers built into the Constitution the principle of
to make sure that no one branch of the federal government
gained too much power over the other two.
A. separation of powers
B. checks and balances
C. inherent rights of individuals
D. states rights
E government by the people
Answer:
system of checks and balances
The system of checks and balances in government was developed to ensure that no one branch of government would become too powerful.