Bail is only intended to guarantee that defendants will show up for their trial and any required pretrial hearings. When a defendant's trial is over, several states deduct a processing fee before returning their bail to them.
The sum of money known as bail is required from defendants in order to be freed from custody prior to their trial. A bond is not a fine. It shouldn't be applied as a form of discipline. Bail is only intended to guarantee that defendants will show up for their trial and any required pretrial hearings. In some places, bail is refunded to defendants upon the conclusion of their case, less a processing charge.
The court or magistrate considers a number of issues when determining the bond amount: the possibility that the criminal may flee, the alleged offense, the "dangerousness" of the defendants, and the public safety.
To learn more about Bail please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14272042
#SPJ4
Describe what an officer must demonstrate to justify an emergency search.
Answer:
Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself
Explanation:
mary, who has developed a deep hatred of joe, disguises her voice and calls him one night claiming to be a nurse at a hospital in the city where joe's parents live and tells him that his parents have just been killed in a car accident. joe would be most likely to win a tort suit for:
In the given case, Joe would be most likely to win a tort suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress
In this situation, Joe might have a strong case for intentionally causing Mary emotional anguish. When someone's extreme and outrageous behavior causes serious emotional distress to another person, a tort claim known as the intentional imposition of emotional distress may be made. Instead of just being careless, the behaviour must be reckless or purposeful.
In this scenario, Mary deliberately covered her voice when she called Joe to inform him that his parents had passed away. It might be argued that this behaviour is harsh and obnoxious and that it is meant to cause Joe great emotional discomfort. Additionally, the case for deliberate infliction of emotional distress is strengthened by the fact that Mary has a strong dislike for Joe and called him, particularly because of this.
Read more about emotional distress on:
https://brainly.com/question/31183618
#SPJ4
Although elections can be very candidate-centered, for which of the following does the party organization often provide considerable support?
a) Voter data lists
b) Donor lists
c) Voter registration drives
d) Campaign funds
e) All of these are correct.
The party organization often provide considerable support to all of these Although elections can be very candidate-centered.
What does the political party do?A local party organization is a group in charge of a political party's operations at the city, county, or district levels but which is not registered as a district or local party committee with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
Which of the following is the role of a political party that is most crucial?The primary goal of political parties is to nominate and elect as many people as possible to public office. Once in office, these representatives work to advance their party's objectives through legislation and program initiatives.
What crucial roles do political parties and elections play in the government, in your opinion?In the study of politics in developing nations, particularly in the study of democratization and, more specifically, the consolidation of democratic political regimes, political parties and elections play a significant role.
Know more about voter:
brainly.com/question/21910013
#SPJ4
You should call for emergency medical attention if a child in your care has serious injury
The statement "You should call for emergency medical attention if a child in your care has serious injury" is correct. In case of a serious injury, it is important to seek immediate medical help for the child. Here's a step-by-step explanation:
1. Assess the seriousness of the injury: Determine if the child's injury requires immediate medical attention. Examples of serious injuries include severe bleeding, unconsciousness, difficulty breathing, severe burns, broken bones, or head injuries.
2. Call emergency services: If the injury is deemed serious, dial the emergency number in your country (such as 911) to contact medical professionals. Provide them with clear and accurate information about the child's condition and location.
3. Follow instructions and provide first aid: While waiting for medical help to arrive, follow any instructions given by the emergency dispatcher and provide basic first aid if you are trained to do so. This may include stopping bleeding, stabilizing the child's neck in case of a suspected spinal injury, or performing CPR if necessary.
In conclusion, it is crucial to promptly call for emergency medical attention if a child in your care has a serious injury. This ensures that the child receives the necessary medical care in a timely manner.
Learn more about emergency medical attention here:
https://brainly.com/question/12785729
#SPJ11
Both Thomas Aquinas and Francis Beckwith agree that the natural law ________________.
Both Thomas Aquinas and Francis Beckwith agree that the natural law is a set of moral principles that are inherent in the nature of human beings and can be discovered through reason and observation of the world around us. They believe that these principles are universal and apply to all people, regardless of their culture, religion, or personal beliefs.
According to Aquinas, the natural law is based on the idea that human beings have a rational nature and are capable of discerning right from wrong. He believes that the natural law is grounded in the objective nature of reality, and that it is discoverable through reason and experience. Beckwith maintains that the natural law is not a set of arbitrary rules imposed by a divine authority, but rather a reflection of the inherent order of the universe.
In summary, both Aquinas and Beckwith agree that the natural law is a set of moral principles that are inherent in human nature and can be discovered through reason and observation of the world around us. They believe that these principles are universal and apply to all people, and that they are based on the idea that human beings have a rational nature and are capable of discerning right from wrong.
To know more about Thomas Aquinas visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/14462383
#SPJ11
Which of the following has original jurisdiction over cases involving disputes between two or more states?
U.S. Circuit Court
U.S. District Court
U.S. Supreme Court
US. Intermediate Appellate Court
The court which has original jurisdiction over cases involving controversies between two or further countries is the US Supreme Court.
Original jurisdiction is the capacity of a court to hear a case for the first time. It can be distinguished from appellate governance, which is a court's capability to consider a case that a lower court has preliminarily heard and determined.
The Supreme Court's governance — its power to hear cases is established under Composition III, Section II of the Constitution. Certain cases, similar as suits involving two or further countries and/ or cases involving ministers and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original governance.
To learn more on original jurisdiction, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13961368
#SPJ4
which model of the courtroom work groups displays prosecutors and defense attorneys as competing against each other for the search of truth?
Adversarial System model of the courtroom work groups displays prosecutors and defense attorneys as competing against each other for the search of truth.
Public prosecutors may have different responsibilities depending on the legal system in a given nation. Around the world, the adversarial and inquisitorial legal traditions predominate in how cases are investigated and decided. The adjudication process in common law nations uses an adversarial system to ascertain the facts.
The judge acts as a referee to ensure fairness to the accused and that the legal requirements of criminal procedure are adhered to as the prosecution and defense compete against one another. The adversarial system makes the assumption that the most accurate way to ascertain the facts and apply the law is through a competitive process.
Learn more about Adversarial System at:
brainly.com/question/5921518
#SPJ4
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
jamie buys a new home. under local city law, jamie is prohibited from building a second home on her parcel of land. this prohibition by the city is referred to be the textbook as
The type of bailment frequently influences the level of care required of the bailee. A bailment made solely for the bailee's benefit generally entails a high duty of care.
An ordinary duty of care is established by a bailment for mutual benefit. A small duty of care is created when a bailment is made for the sole benefit of the bailor.
Workers who are unemployed due to no fault of their own and who meet other state UI law eligibility requirements are eligible to receive unemployment benefits through the UI program, which is a partnership between the federal government and the states. The individual UI program is run by each state in accordance with federal regulations.
Learn more about bailment here:
https://brainly.com/question/28187904
#SPJ4
Under Fair Use, which of the following purposes does not qualify for use or copy of any copyrighted work without permission?
Criticism
News Reporting
Commercial Use (something to be sold)
Teaching
Scholarship Research
should texas cease using the death penalty for capital cases? why or why not?
The death penalty is a sensitive issue in Texas that has drawn significant attention over the years. While some people believe that the death penalty is an appropriate sentence for capital cases, others argue that it should be abolished. The death penalty should be abolished because it is expensive, unreliable, and inhumane.
Firstly, the death penalty is an expensive option for capital cases. The process of the death penalty is complicated and involves many steps that require considerable financial resources. Appeals, investigations, and trials take up a significant portion of the criminal justice system’s budget. The cost of legal representation, juries, and judges, as well as appeals, can add up to several million dollars per case. In some cases, the cost of the death penalty is so high that it exceeds the cost of life imprisonment without parole. Therefore, abolishing the death penalty would free up a significant amount of funds that could be allocated to other areas of the criminal justice system.
Secondly, the death penalty is unreliable. There have been numerous cases in which innocent people have been sentenced to death. Flaws in the criminal justice system, such as the unreliability of eyewitness testimony and forensic science, have resulted in wrongful convictions. The possibility of an innocent person being put to death is a serious risk that cannot be ignored. For this reason, the death penalty should be abolished to prevent the risk of wrongful convictions.
Lastly, the death penalty is inhumane. The act of putting someone to death is a brutal and barbaric punishment. The process of execution, whether by lethal injection, electric chair, or any other method, is a traumatic experience that violates human dignity. Furthermore, the death penalty perpetuates a cycle of violence that does not address the root causes of crime.
In conclusion, the death penalty is a flawed and outdated practice that should be abolished. Its abolition would save taxpayers’ money, reduce the risk of wrongful convictions, and uphold human dignity. Life imprisonment without parole is a viable alternative that would provide an appropriate punishment for capital cases.
To know more about death penalty visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31880130
#SPJ11
In general, in deciding whether to strike down a punitive damage award as unconstitutional, the court will look at all of the following except the: _______.
Multiple choice question.
difference between the punitive damages awarded by the jury and the civil penalties authorized or imposed in comparable cases
disparity between the actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive damage award
degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct
difference between the amount of nominal damages and the amount of compensatory damages awarded at the trial court level
Answer: The purpose of punitive damages is to punish the wrongdoer and deter others from similar wrongdoing.
Explanation:
When considering whether a punitive damage award is excessive, the court will consider several factors including the degree of misconduct, the harm suffered by the plaintiff, and the difference between the punitive damages and civil penalties.
In general, in deciding whether to strike down a punitive damage award as unconstitutional, the court will look at all of the following except the difference between the amount of nominal damages and the amount of compensatory damages awarded at the trial court level.
The other factors that the court will consider include the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct, the disparity between the actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive damage award, and the difference between the punitive damages awarded by the jury and the civil penalties authorized or imposed in comparable cases.
Punitive damages are damages that are awarded to punish a defendant for their misconduct or to deter others from engaging in similar conduct. However, excessive punitive damage awards can be unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
When determining whether a punitive damage award is excessive, the court will consider the factors mentioned above. The nominal damages are not relevant to this analysis as they are a symbolic amount awarded to recognize a legal injury without requiring any compensation.
Visit here to learn more about Plaintiff:
brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ11
According to the reading, what were the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche? Check all that apply. to promote the Christian religion to celebrate the holiday to encourage the celebration of Christmas to show how the holiday started to act as a place for prayer
Answer:
to celebrate the holiday
to show how the holiday started
Explanation:
This is the reading
The narrow question is whether there is a secular purpose for Pawtucket's display of the crèche. The display is sponsored by the city to celebrate the Holiday and to depict the origins of that Holiday. These are legitimate secular purposes.
—Chief Justice Warren Burger,
Opinion of the Court,
Lynch v. Donnelly
1984
From this reading it can be inferred that the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche was to show how the holiday started and also to to celebrate the holiday.
Answer:
To celebrate the holiday
To show how the holiday started
Explanation:
The legislation passed by Congress at Johnson's urging in 1965 included all of the following EXCEPT:
a. Medicare and Medicaid.
b. funds for urban renewal and public housing.
c. anti-poverty aid to Appalachia.
d. government guarantee of full employment.
e. massive federal aid to education.
The legislation passed by Congress at Johnson's urging in 1965 included all of the following except: government guarantee of full employment. So, option D is accurate.
The legislation passed by Congress at Johnson's urging in 1965 included all of the following except the government guarantee of full employment. The legislation referred to is commonly known as the "Great Society" programs. It was an ambitious set of policies aimed at addressing poverty, inequality, and improving social welfare. The programs enacted included Medicare and Medicaid, providing healthcare for the elderly and low-income individuals respectively. It also allocated funds for urban renewal and public housing, aimed at improving living conditions in cities. Additionally, anti-poverty aid to Appalachia and massive federal aid to education were part of the legislation, focusing on addressing regional poverty and enhancing educational opportunities. However, a government guarantee of full employment was not included as part of the legislation.
To know more about Congress
brainly.com/question/28583709
#SPJ11
this defense requires a jury to divide up the proportion of negligence committed by the parties in terms of percentage
The defense that requires a jury to divide up the proportion of negligence committed by the parties in terms of percentage is called "comparative negligence." Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine used to determine responsibility and damages in personal injury cases.
It is a defense used by the defendant, which asserts that the plaintiff was partially or wholly responsible for the damages suffered, and thus the defendant should only be held liable for the percentage of damages that they caused. Comparative negligence requires a jury to apportion liability between the plaintiff and defendant based on their respective degrees of fault.
The jury is asked to determine the percentage of negligence attributed to each party, and damages are awarded based on that percentage. In states that follow pure comparative negligence, a plaintiff can still recover damages even if they were found to be 99% at fault, but their damages will be reduced by their percentage of fault.
Learn more about doctrine
https://brainly.com/question/30613074
#SPJ11
how long do alcohol related charges stay on a driving record? a. two years b. five years c. until a driver renews his/her license d. forever
The alcohol related charges stay on a driving record is for the five years, Thus, option B is correct.
Why is a driving record important?Motor vehicle record or MVRs are significant because they not only provide peace of mind, but also provide critical information about an employee's driving history, disasters, convictions, travelling violations, and suspensions. Drivers who have multiple violations are more likely to be involved in an accident in the future.
Therefore, option B is correct, that the alcohol-related charges remain on a driver's record for five years.
Learn more about the driving record, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10053599
#SPJ1
The Bureau of Consumer Protection is one part of the Federal Trade Commission. How do regulatory agencies like these impact consumers? How do they affect businesses?
Any incorrect or silly answers will not be accepted, this isn't a joke
Answer: The bureau of consumer protection is an organization that protects the rights of consumers.
Explanation:
The bureau of consumer protection collects complaints from consumers. It conducts investigations on the sale and purchase of goods or services and fraudulent and unfair business practices.
The bureau of consumer protection is a regulatory agency, which develops the rules to maintain the fair marketplace by educating the consumers. The unethical business practices in which consumers are being cheated are sued by the bureau.
Define the term federalism and compare and contrast it with unitary and confederation governments. Give examples of each.
Federalism is a political system where power is divided between a central government and smaller, regional governments. In this system, both levels of government maintain distinct powers and responsibilities, while also cooperating on certain matters.
In contrast, a unitary government is a system where all power resides with a single, central authority. Regional governments, if any, only hold powers delegated by the central government. An example of a unitary government is France, where the national government retains ultimate authority over all administrative divisions. Confederation governments, on the other hand, are alliances of independent states that agree to work together on specific matters, while retaining their autonomy. In this system, the central government's authority is limited, and states have more power. An example of a confederation is the European Union, where member countries cooperate on certain policies but maintain their sovereignty.
To know more about Federalism
https://brainly.com/question/985210
#SPJ11
the primary legal responsibility of business is to obey the law. true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The primary legal responsibility of a business is to obey the law. This means that businesses must operate within the legal framework established by the government, including complying with relevant laws, regulations, and rules. Businesses must also fulfill their legal obligations, such as paying taxes, obtaining necessary licenses and permits, and complying with labor laws and environmental regulations. While businesses have many other responsibilities, such as fulfilling their obligations to customers and stakeholders, obeying the law is the foundation of any ethical and responsible business practice.
Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which correct- ed us and we gave them "rever ence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto Rthe Father of Spirits, and live? respect Job 12:10]
Answer:
hihihihihhhihihhiihihhiihihihihihhihi903[5yh98thj45yyy-95y09t90ytr09y4905790-369-543i90v,-y,v[yv5,wc08w,hw84y0t8yi09iy950i092iy95029y025yi09i5y2yi905yii920``1``1``1`1`11`1222`3e1e2``e32`e3r3`x`ioj44`3ixi]4x3xrjgijtiotoitjtjiotjjioitjiotExplanation: gopk2ogktrgkogkgpogkpgtkgpogkpgkrtgowrtrtrtrtrrrrtttrgvvvvvvvv
How do elections impact the supreme court? Discuss how the roles of the president and senate affect the supreme court and how the political makeup of the senate and president can impact it.
Elections can impact the Supreme Court through the roles of the President and Senate. The President nominates justices to the Court, and the Senate has the power to confirm or reject those nominations. The political makeup of the Senate and President can greatly impact the composition and decisions of the Court.
When a Supreme Court vacancy arises, the President has the authority to nominate a new justice. This nomination is then sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration. The Senate Judiciary Committee holds confirmation hearings and then votes to send the nomination to the full Senate for a vote. The Senate can confirm the nominee by a simple majority vote, or they can reject the nominee.
The political makeup of the Senate and President can play a significant role in the confirmation process. If the President and Senate are of the same political party, it is generally easier for the President to get their nominee confirmed.
To know more about Elections, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ4
Which decision rule establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards?
The decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards is the lexicographic decision rule.
Lexicographic decision rule is a type of decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards.
The decision rule is often used in situations where a company is seeking to make a decision among a number of options that are all acceptable, but which differ in terms of their performance levels on various evaluative criteria.
In the lexicographic decision rule, the decision maker sets a minimum standard for each criterion and selects the option that performs best on the most important criterion, without considering the performance levels of the other criteria.
If there is a tie, the decision maker moves to the second most important criterion and selects the option that performs best on that criterion, and so on, until a decision is made. This rule is also known as the priority rule or the lexicographic ordering rule.
To know more about lexicographic decision rule, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29839779#
#SPJ11
A state law is:
Laws that are the same across the entire country.
Laws unique to that particular state.
Laws that do not come from the Constitution.
Laws that U.S. citizens must follow while visiting other countries.
Answer:
B. Laws that do not come from the Constitution.
A choice-of-law clause specifies which law will govern in case of a dispute between two organizations or companies. true or false?
The given statement is True. A choice-of-law clause specifies which law will govern in case of a dispute between two organizations or companies.
What do you mean by choice-of-law ?
Choice-of-law is the term used to describe the law chosen by parties involved in a legal dispute to govern their contractual obligations and/or resolve their legal disputes. It is also referred to as the conflict of laws, and it is the process of determining which jurisdiction’s law applies to a particular legal dispute. This can be determined through choice of law clauses, which are commonly included in international contracts, or through the application of lex loci, which is a legal principle that the law of the place where the contract is executed or the dispute arises will be applied. Choice-of-law plays an important role in international business transactions, as it can help to ensure that the obligations of the parties are enforced in a manner consistent with the laws of the jurisdiction chosen.
This clause is often included in contracts to ensure that any disputes are governed by the law of the state that is most beneficial to the parties involved.
To learn more about Choice-of-law:
https://brainly.com/question/1387188
#SPJ1
Of the proposed methods for responding to an unruly defendant in Illinois v. Allen, which did the Supreme Court state should be used as a last resort for fear of prejudicing the jury against the defendant?
Answer:
Gag and bind defendants
Explanation:
In the Illinois v. Allen case of 1970, the Supreme court upheld the gag or bind order which allows for the removal of an unruly defendant who interrupts court proceedings. In that particular case, Allen was tried for ordering a drink in a bar, refusing to pay, and collecting $200 at gunpoint from a bartender. When he was charged to court, Allen refused the public defender whom the court assigned to him, rather insisting that he would defend himself. He proved verbally abusive to the judge even issuing him a death threat when he tried convincing him of the need for a public defender who understands the language of the court. When the situation proved uncontrollable, the judge ordered that Allen be taken out of the court and only brought in when there was a need for him to be identified.
The Supreme court upheld this decision agreeing that any defendant whose actions proved disruptive to the court should be removed from the courtroom. Gag and shackles were one of the three methods proposed for controlling an unruly defendant and it was to be the last resort. The reason for this is that when the judges see the defendant in that condition it could play on their emotions, thus making them prejudiced.
Ok I swear the censor thing is annoying. I just wanna gib som points to my hommies ya feel me?
IF ANOTHER DRIVER "CUTS" IN FRONT OF YOU, IT WOULD BE BETTER IF YOU:
A. Take your foot off the gas
B. Brake suddenly
C. Accelerate to avoid being cut off
B. Brake suddenly
I think its the answer, otherwise we'll crash
Brake suddenly is the better way, if another driver cuts in front of the person, as it stop the chances of accident.
What are the major reason of accident on road?Excessive speeding, reckless driving, breaking the law, failing to read the signs, being tired, and drinking. Pedestrian: Ignorance, errant crossing, moving on the carriageway, jaywalkers, and carelessness.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about major reason of accident on road, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15113880
#SPJ2
A federal crime involving parties on Guam would most likely be heard in which court?answer choices- U.S. Court of International Trade- U.S. Tax Court- U.S. Court of Federal Claims- Territorial Courts
A federal crime involving parties on Guam would most likely be heard in Territorial Courts.
What does Territorial courts mean?
Territorial courts are courts of limited jurisdiction established by the United States Congress in the various territories of the United States. These courts have jurisdiction to hear and decide civil and criminal cases arising under the laws of the U.S. territories and the laws of the United States.
What does Fedral crime mean?
A federal crime is any criminal offense that violates a law established by the United States Congress. Examples of federal crimes include tax evasion, counterfeiting, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank robbery, and certain drug offenses. Federal crimes are investigated by federal law enforcement agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and prosecuted in federal court.
Therefore the option D. Territorial Courts is the correct answer.
To know more about Fedral Crime,
https://brainly.com/question/26346767
#SPJ4
Toward the end of the chapter, ‘Nightmare,’ Cortney experiences memory loss. What does Cortney continue to ask about? What are some of the things he ‘can’t’ remember?
Courtney's memory loss in the chapter "Nightmare" is a moving illustration of the psychological wounds that soldiers endure long after they leave the battlefield.
Memory loss results in loss of identity and sense of self in addition to knowledge loss. For example, Courtney's inability to remember the names of her fellow soldiers shows how fragmented her identity is and how she feels isolated from others who have gone through the same tragedy. Furthermore, Courtney's concern for the safety and well-being of her fellow soldiers raises the possibility of a strong sense of survivor's guilt. His memory loss may be a coping mechanism for him as he struggles with the idea that he has lived while others have not.
Learn more about memory loss, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28826460
#SPJ1
the recent upsurge of federal criminal cases is largely attributable to the increase in
Answer:
Prosecutions for drug offenses
In the United States, federal criminal cases have seen a significant upsurge in recent years. This can be largely attributed to the increase in crimes related to drugs and immigration offenses.
Drug-related crimes, which involve the production, distribution, and sale of illegal drugs such as cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, and marijuana, have been on the rise. Many people who are addicted to drugs have been involved in these crimes, and the police have been working hard to crack down on drug trafficking rings and other illegal activities. In addition, immigration offenses, such as illegal entry or overstaying a visa, have been on the rise. Federal agencies have been working hard to combat these crimes, and as a result, there has been a significant increase in the number of federal criminal cases.
To know more about Offense visit-
brainly.com/question/11182959
#SPJ11