What is the scale factor from Polygon A to Polygon B?

The confidence interval based on the given values (x = 45, n = 96, Confidence level = 95%.

The confidence level (95%), sample size (n = 96), and sample mean (x = 45), we can calculate the margin of error and the confidence interval. Here's how:

1. Margin of Error:

The margin of error represents the maximum expected difference between the true population parameter and the sample estimate. It depends on the confidence level and the standard deviation (which we don't have in this case).

Since the standard deviation is unknown, we can use the t-distribution to estimate it. With a sample size of n = 96, the degrees of freedom are (n - 1) = 95. Considering a 95% confidence level, the critical value for a two-tailed test is approximately 1.984 (referencing a t-distribution table or calculator).

The margin of error (E) can be calculated using the following formula:

E = critical value * (standard deviation / sqrt(n))

However, since we don't have the standard deviation, we can't compute the margin of error in this case.

2. Confidence Interval:

The confidence interval represents a range of values within which the true population parameter is likely to fall.

The confidence interval can be calculated using the formula:

CI = x ± (critical value * standard deviation / sqrt(n))

The confidence interval based on the given values (x = 45, n = 96, confidence level = 95%.

To know more about Confidence level.

https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ11

Austin's rate of motion is (1/70)π Radians per second.

To determine Austin's rate of motion in radians per second, we need to use the formula for angular velocity:

ω = Δθ / Δt

Where:

ω = angular velocity (in radians per second)

Δθ = change in angular displacement (in radians)

Δt = change in time (in seconds)

We know that Austin runs three-quarters of a circular track, which means he covers an arc length that is equal to three-quarters of the circumference of the circle. Let's call the radius of the circle "r". Then, the arc length covered by Austin is given by:

s = (3/4) * 2πr

s = (3/2)πr

We also know that it takes Austin 1 minute and 45 seconds to cover this distance. This is the same as 105 seconds (since 1 minute = 60 seconds).

So, Δt = 105 seconds

Now, we can calculate the change in angular displacement (Δθ). The total angle around a circle is 2π radians, so the angle covered by Austin is given by:

Δθ = (3/4) * 2π

Δθ = (3/2)π

Therefore, Austin's rate of motion (ω) in radians per second is:

ω = Δθ / Δt

ω = [(3/2)π] / 105

ω = (3/210)π

ω = (1/70)π radians per second

So, Austin's rate of motion is (1/70)π radians per second.

To know more about Radians .

https://brainly.com/question/19758686

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

a probability is always the ratio of

desired cases / totally possible cases

in our case, where we pull one card out of 52, the totally possible cases are, of course, 52.

now, we need to find the number of desired cases.

8 of diamonds is pulled.

well, that is one specific card. no other card matches this criteria. so, the probability is

1/52 = 0.019230769... ≈ 0.019

heart or spade is selected.

we have 13 cards of heart.

we have 13 cards of spades.

there is no overlap, so, together they are 26.

the probably is then

26/52 = 1/2 = 0.5

number smaller than 7 is pulled.

"smaller than 7" means 1..6.

that means 6 cards of each of the 4 suits = 24 cards.

the probability is then

24/52 = 6/13 = 0.461538462... ≈ 0.462

Answer:

A. \(n=100\)
B. \(k=0\)

Step-by-step explanation:

A. The equation "110% n = 11" can be solved as follows:

110% n = 11

To solve for n, we need to get rid of the percentage sign (%). We can do this by dividing both sides of the equation by 110%, or 0.110 (since 110% is equivalent to 1.1 in decimal form).

(110% n) / 110% = 11 / 110%

n = 11 / 0.110

n = 100

So, the solution for n in the equation "110% n = 11" is n = 100.

B. The given equation is:

(328 x 128) x k = 328 x (82 x 128) x k

To solve for k, we can simplify the equation using the properties of multiplication.

Step 1: Perform the multiplications inside the parentheses:

41984 x k = 328 x 10576 x k

Step 2: Rearrange the equation by applying the associative property of multiplication:

41984 x k = 328 x (10576 x k)

Step 3: Divide both sides of the equation by 328:

(41984 x k) / 328 = 10576 x k

Step 4: Cancel out the common factor of k on the left-hand side:

(41984 / 328) x k = 10576 x k

Step 5: Simplify the left-hand side:

128 x k = 10576 x k

Step 6: Subtract 10576 x k from both sides of the equation to isolate k:

128 x k - 10576 x k = 0

Step 7: Factor out k on the left-hand side:

k x (128 - 10576) = 0

Step 8: Simplify further:

k x (-10448) = 0

Step 9: Divide both sides of the equation by (-10448):

k = 0

So, the solution for k in the equation "(328 x 128) x k = 328 x (82 x 128) x k" is k = 0.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  A) 80°

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of the angle measures in this hexagon is ...

  (6 -2)×180° = 720°

Then the value of x (in degrees) can be found from ...

  x + 2x = 720 -78 -134 -136 -132 = 240

  x = 240/3 = 80

The value of x is 80 degrees.

Answer:

A. 80°

Step-by-step explanation:

As we know that the sum of measures of angles of hexagon is 720 ° .

78° + 134 ° + 136 ° + 132 ° + 2x + x = 720°

combine like terms

480° + 3 x = 720°

subtract 480° from both side

480 ° - 480° + 3 x = 720° - 480°

3 x = 240°

Divide each side by 3

3x / 3 = 240°/3

x = 80 °.

Hence, value of x = 80°

Verification :-

if x = 80°

then ,

2x = 2 × 80° = 160°

Now, Sum of all angles of hexagon is

78° + 134 ° + 136 ° + 132 ° + 160° + 80° = 720°

Answer:

b. form: p → q invalid, converse error q ∴ p

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

p = "there are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers,"

let

q = "the set of all irrational numbers is infinite."

We can write the above argument as:

If there are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers, then the set of all irrational numbers is infinite

p → q

The set of all irrational numbers is infinite

q

There are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers

p

So collectively it can be written as:

p → q

 q

∴p

So it looks like

if p then q

q

therefore p

This is a fallacious argument.  This means the conclusion can be false even when the premises are true. This type of argument is invalid.

Suppose we know that “If there are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers, then the set of all irrational numbers is infinite” is a true conditional statement. We also know that "the set of all irrational numbers is infinite" is true. This is not enough to say that "there are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers," is true. The reason for this is that there is nothing logically about “If p then q” and “q” that means p must follow. So this is a converse error and since converse error is an invalid method of inference rule so this argument is invalid.

Let us prove this argument is invalid with a truth table:

p   q   p → q   q   p

T   T      T       T   T

T   F      F       F   T

F   T      T       T   F

F   F      T       F   F

Since we know that the premises are:

p → q   and  q

and the conclusion is p

and an argument is valid if and only if all of its premises are true, then the conclusion is true. We should check that whenever both p → q   and  q are true then p is true but the third row fails. Thus this is an invalid argument.

The first ten terms of the Lucas sequence are 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123, 199, 322, 521, 843.

The Lucas sequence or Lucas series are an integer sequence named after the mathematician francois Edouard Lucas, which are similar to the Fibonacci numbers, each Lucas number is defined to be the sum of its two immediate previous terms, thereby forming a fibonacci integer sequence.

Now, the sequence of first 10 numbers of Fibonacci series are-

0, 1, 1 ,2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34

which are defined as set of integers that starts with zero, followed by a one,then by another one and then by series of steadily increasing numbers,The sequence follow the rule that each number is equal to the sum of preceding two numbers.

And the sequence of Lucas sequence is -

2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123, 199, 322, 521, 843.

which is definedas  the sum of its two immediate previous terms.

The Lucas number may thus be defined as follows;

Ln =    \(\left \{ {{2} ; if n= 0 \atop {1}; if n = 1} \right.\)

Here we can see that Lucas series starts with 2 and 1 whereas Fibonacci series starts with 0 and 1.

Hence,The first ten terms of the Lucas sequence are 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123, 199, 322, 521, 843.

More about Lucas Sequence:

https://brainly.com/question/9807586

#SPJ1

Lower quartile. The correct option is A

The lower quartile, often known as the first quartile or Q1, is a measure of central tendency that separates the bottom 25% of a data set from the rest of the data.

In this instance, five out of the 20 students received scores of 70 or lower, which equals a 25% proficiency rate.

Therefore, 70 or below is the lower quartile.

Learn more about Lower quartile here : brainly.com/question/28169373

#SPJ1

Answer:

Straight

Step-by-step explanation:

supplementary means sum of two angles

with 180

The difference in overall gain between selling stock A at the current day's high price or low price and selling stock B at the current day's high price or low price is $239.50.

To determine the difference in overall gain or loss between selling stock A at the current day's high price or low price and selling stock B at the current day's high price or low price, we need to calculate the selling prices of the stocks.

Stock A:

High price = $105.19

Low price = $103.25

Close price = $103.38

Stock B:

High price = $145.18

Low price = $143.28

Close price = $144.05

The investor purchased 50 shares of stock A at $90 per share and 75 shares of stock B at $145 per share.

To calculate the selling prices, we need to multiply the number of shares by the respective selling price.

Selling price of stock A at the high price: 50 shares \(\times\) $105.19 = $5,259.50

Selling price of stock A at the low price: 50 shares \(\times\) $103.25 = $5,162.50

Selling price of stock B at the high price: 75 shares \(\times\) $145.18 = $10,888.50

Selling price of stock B at the low price: 75 shares \(\times\) $143.28 = $10,746.00

Now, let's calculate the difference in overall gain or loss:

Difference in overall gain = Selling price at the high price - Selling price at the low price

= ($5,259.50 + $10,888.50) - ($5,162.50 + $10,746.00)

= $16,148.00 - $15,908.50

= $239.50

For similar question on selling stock.

https://brainly.com/question/13454463  

#SPJ8

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4 the sum of 3 and 5, divided by 4

Answer:

i think its - The chapter test and retest Q3 are the same, but the chapter test has the higher median.

Step-by-step explanation:

if i'm wrong please let me know.

Answer:

C )The chapter test and retest Q1 are the same, but the retest has the higher median.

x | y | 1st difference | 2nd difference

-10 | 200 | |

-9 | 162 | 162-200 = -38 |

-8 | 128 | 128 - 162 = -34 | -34 - (-38) = 4

-7 | 98 | 98 - 128 = -30 | -30 - (-34) = 4

-6 | 72 | 72 - 98 = -26 | -26 - (-30) = 4

Since the first differences all are different, then the function is not linear.

Given that all the second differences are equal, then the function is quadratic.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (2,5) and (7,8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Gabby has increased the y-coordinates by 2 units to get her first parallel line. She can do the same thing again to get the second parallel line.

  (2, 3+2) = (2, 5)

  (7, 6+2) = (7, 8)

The percentage increase in the cost of the jewelry items that All That Glitters Jewelry Store uses to markup its prices to maximize its profits is as follows:

The percentage increase shows the relative differences between the original cost prices of the pieces of jewelry and their selling prices.

This percentage increase is otherwise known as the markup.

The markup shows the percent increase by which an item is sold to achieve a profit target.

The formula for computing percent increase is the Increase divided by the original amount multiplied by 100.

All That Glitters Accounting Sheet

Items             Cost     Price     Difference            Percent Increase

Initial ring      $60      $90    $30 ($90 - $60)       50% ($30/$60 x 100)

ID bracelet  $120    $240   $120 ($240 - $120) 100% ($120/$120 x 100)

Earrings        $25      $50    $25 ($50 - $25)     100% ($25/$25 x 100)

Pins               $36      $45      $9 ($45 - $36)       25% ($9/$36 x 100)

Thus, All That Glitters Jewelry Store uses different markups or percent increases to sell its goods.

Learn more about percentages at brainly.com/question/30151285

#SPJ1

All That Glitters Accounting Sheet

Items            Cost    Price

Initial ring      $60      $90

ID bracelet  $120    $240    

Earrings        $25      $50

Pins               $36      $45

What is the percent increase for each item?

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

to find how many pieces we use division

we divide the main piece of wood size ÷ small sizes

4.5 ÷0.75 = 6 pieces

[  3   9   13 ] is the Matrix showing all types of property available in key west .

A matrix is a rectangular array or table of numbers, symbols, or expressions arranged in rows and columns to represent a mathematical object or an attribute of such an entity in mathematics.

given in the table that how many types of property are there in the table

its a simple matrix which u can directly see

its a  3 x 1 matrix ...

[3  9  13] this matrix shows the required value

hope this helps...

learn more about matrix here :

brainly.com/question/28180105

#SPJ13

Answer:  [3 9 13]

Step-by-step explanation:

The height of the tree is 104.96 feet.

Tangent function of an angle in a right angled triangle is defined as the ratio of the opposite side to the adjacent side.

The right angled triangle representing the question is given below.

P represents the point on the ground.

G is the bottom of tree on the ground and T represents the point where the height of the tree end.

Let h is the height of the tree.

By the definition of tangent function,

tan 52° = h / 82

h = tan (52°) × 82

h = 1.2799 × 82

h = 104.9552 feet ≈ 104.96 feet

Hence the tree is 104.96 feet tall.

Learn more about Tangent Functions here :

https://brainly.com/question/29305357

#SPJ1

The actual consumer spending at a price of $27 per unit is $268.26.

Substitute the given price into the supply equation to get the corresponding quantity supplied:

p = q + 10

27 = q + 10

q = 17

Substitute q = 17 into the demand equation to get the corresponding price:

4q² + p² = 1405

4(17)² + p² = 1405

p² = 1405 - 1156

p² = 249

p = 15.78

The actual consumer spending can be calculated by multiplying the quantity demanded by the price:

Actual consumer spending = quantity demanded x price per unit

= 17 x 15.78

= $268.26

Leans more about price on

https://brainly.com/question/1153322

#SPJ1

The demand and supply equations for a certain product are given by space 4 q squared plus p squared equals 1405 and p equals q plus 10 where p is in dollars per unit and q is in units. For a price of $27 per unit, determine the actual consumer spending.

Answer:

d.

Step-by-step explanation:

because your multiplying 5 from input to get the output

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

The greatest common factor of 12 and 24 is 12. The only option which accounts for this is D.

Actual time is much longer than the 50-year timeframe suggested by the speaker.

How to verify the statement?

This claim is based on the assumption that the rate of pollution reduction from each factory remains constant at 80%, and the number of factories increases by 3% per annum.

To verify this claim, we can use the following formula to calculate the expected total pollution after n years:

Total pollution after n years = \(Present \: pollution \: level x (1 + 0.03)^n \times (1 - 0.8)^n\)

Here, the first factor represents the increase in pollution due to the growth in the number of factories, and the second factor represents the reduction in pollution due to the 80% reduction in pollution from each factory.

We can set the expected total pollution after n years equal to the present pollution level and solve for n:

\(Present \: pollution \: level = Present \: pollution \: level \times (1 + 0.03)^n \times (1 - 0.8)^n\)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

\(1 = 1.03^n \times 0.2^n\)

Taking the logarithm of both sides of the equation, we get,

\(n \times log(1.03) + n \times log(0.2) = 0 \\ n \times (log(1.03) + log(0.2)) = 0 \\ n = \frac{0} { (log(1.03) + log(0.2))} \\ n = 271.56\)

Therefore, according to this calculation, it would take approximately 272 years for the total annual pollution to return to its present level if the number of factories in the country increases by 3% per annum, and they all immediately reduce the amount of pollution they produce by 80%. This is much longer than the 50-year timeframe suggested by the speaker.

It is important to note that this calculation assumes that the pollution reduction from each factory remains constant at 80% and does not take into account any other factors that may affect pollution levels, such as changes in technology or regulations. Therefore, this should be considered as a rough estimate and not as an exact prediction.

Learn more about pollution here,

https://brainly.com/question/24704410

#SPJ1

Correct question is "A speaker claimed that if the number of factories in the country increases by 3% per annum, then even if they all immediately reduced the amount of pollution they produce by 80%, the total annual pollution will be back to its present level in about 50 years. Verify the statement. (use logarithm)"

The probability of rolling a specific number is 1/6 or approximately 0.1667.

When rolling a fair number cube with faces numbered 1 through 6, each face has an equal chance of landing face-up. This means the probability of rolling any specific number is 1 out of the total number of faces, which is 6. Therefore, the probability of rolling a specific number is 1/6 or approximately 0.1667.

The dot on the number line represents the probability of an event occurring when rolling the number cube. To determine what this event could be, consider the possible outcomes when rolling the cube and compare their probabilities to the dot's position on the number line.

For example, if the dot is located at 1/6 on the number line, this could represent the probability of rolling a single specific number, such as rolling a 3. If the dot is located at 1/2 or 0.5, it could represent the probability of rolling an even number (2, 4, or 6) since there are three even numbers out of the six total faces, making the probability 3/6 or 1/2.

In summary, the dot on the number line represents the probability of an event occurring when rolling a fair number cube. To identify the event, compare the dot's position on the number line with the probabilities of different outcomes resulting from rolling the cube.

Know more about Probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The amount of money in Marianna's annuity after 6 years will be approximately $300,516.

To calculate the amount of money in Marianna's annuity after 6 years, we can use the formula for compound interest on an annuity:

A = P * ((1 + r/n)^(n*t) - 1) / (r/n)

Where:

A = the final amount in the annuity

P = the regular contribution (each quarter) = $10,000

r = annual interest rate = 8% = 0.08

n = number of compounding periods per year = 4 (since it's compounded quarterly)

t = number of years = 6

Plugging in the values:

A = 10000 * ((1 + 0.08/4)^(4*6) - 1) / (0.08/4)

Calculating this expression:

A ≈ 10000 * ((1.02)^24 - 1) / 0.02

A ≈ 10000 * (1.601032449136241 - 1) / 0.02

A ≈ 10000 * 0.601032449136241 / 0.02

A ≈ 10000 * 30.05162245681205

A ≈ 300,516.22

For more such questions on annuity,click on

https://brainly.com/question/25792915

#SPJ8

Answer:

304200

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the value of P6, use the savings annuity formula

PN=d((1+r/k)N k−1)r/k.

From the question, we know that r=0.08, d=$10,000, k=4 compounding periods per year, and N=6 years. Substitute these values into the formula gives

P6=$10,000 ((1+0.08/4)6⋅4−1)/(0.08/4).

Simplifying further gives P6=$10,000 ((1.02)24−1)/(0.02) and thus P6=$304,218.62.

Rounding as requested, our answer is 304200.

La ecuación cuadrática y² - 8 es una diferencia de cuadrados, cuya forma es (y + 2√2) · (y - 2√2).

Tenemos una ecuación cuadrática de la forma y² - a², donde a es un número real. Según el álgebra de los números reales, esta expresión si corresponde a una diferencia de cuadrados, definida a continuación:

y² - a² = (y + a) · (y - a)

Si tenemos a² = 8, entonces a = √8 = 2√2 y se tiene la siguiente expresión:

y² - 8 = (y + 2√2) · (y - 2√2)

Para aprender más sobre las diferencias de cuadrados: https://brainly.com/question/26147909

#SPJ1