Answer:"Waving the bloody shirt" were pejorative phrases, used during American election campaigns in the 19th century, to deride opposing politicians who made emotional calls to avenge the blood of soldiers that died in the Civil War. The phrases were most often used against Republicans, who were accused of using the memory of the Civil War to their political advantage. Democrats were not above using memories of the Civil War in such a manner as well, especially while campaigning in the South.
Hope you like the answer...
how and why did the interconnections among human societies grow and shrink at different times and how did these changes affect both human lives and the environment?
The interconnections among human societies have grown and shrunk throughout history due to a variety of factors, including technological advancements, trade patterns, conflicts, and cultural exchanges.
For example, the growth of maritime technology and the establishment of long-distance trade networks facilitated the spread of ideas, goods, and people across different regions, leading to the development of new cultures and civilizations. However, wars and political upheavals have also disrupted these connections, leading to the collapse of empires and the fragmentation of societies. These changes have had significant impacts on both human lives and the environment. The expansion of trade networks and the exchange of ideas have led to the development of new technologies, improved standards of living, and cultural diversity. On the other hand, the destruction of natural resources, pollution, and the spread of diseases have also resulted from these interconnections. In conclusion, the growth and shrinkage of interconnections among human societies have had both positive and negative impacts on human lives and the environment. It is important to understand these dynamics to make informed decisions and ensure a sustainable future for all.
for more such questions on societies
https://brainly.com/question/24116605
#SPJ11
When a state refuses to follow a federal law, it is called .
Answer:Nullification
Explanation:
4. Describe three ways in which the ideas from the preamble of the Declaration of Independence are reflected in the U.S. Constitution.
The three ways in which the ideas from the preamble of the Declaration of Independence are reflected in the U.S. Constitution are:
The right to Life.The right to Liberty .The right to Pursuit of Happiness.What three core principles are outlined in the Declaration of Independence's preamble?The Preamble uses a slightly different phrasing from John Locke's, asserting the "self-evident" rights of every person as "Life, Liberty, as well as the the pursuit of Happiness."
The Declaration then went on to explain the right of the people to be justly governed and to have these rights guaranteed by their forms of government based on these three guiding principles. It also recognized the people's right to demand reforms when a political system failed to defend and uphold their fundamental rights.
The Declaration of Independence's aims and guiding principles were implemented by the new government in accordance with the terms of the U.S. Constitution, which was approved in 1788. The U.S. Constitution explicitly incorporated three of the Declaration of Independence's tenets in its preamble.
First, it affirms that all people are equal before God and have inherent rights that cannot be taken away from them.
Second, it states that the constitution itself must guarantee and defend these fundamental rights.
Thirdly, it also indicates that among everyone's fundamental rights, three stand out and will serve as the cornerstones of American law: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Learn more about Declaration of Independence from
https://brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ1
Which of the following was NOT an option Kennedy had in dealing with the Cuban Missile Crisis?
A. Launch a full-scale invasion of Cuba
B. Use nuclear weapons to destroy the missiles
C. Do nothing about the missiles
D. Try diplomatically solving the issue
Option B is correct.Three alternatives did Kennedy have for the duration of the Cuban missile disaster are Blockade: Use the U.S. Navy to block any missiles from arriving in Cuba.
Air strike: Use the U.S. Air Force to assault all regarded missile sites. Invasion: Launch a full force invasion of Cuba and overthrow of Castro.
What did Kennedy say about the Cuban missile crisis?In his speech the President famously states, “Our purpose is now not the victory of might, but the vindication of right- not peace at the cost of freedom, however both peace and freedom, right here in this Hemisphere, and, we hope, around the world.”
Learn more about Cuban missile crisis here:
https://brainly.com/question/26451777#SPJ13What motives did Japan have in attacking the US naval base at Pearl
Harbor?
Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. They attacked a United States naval base, which killed over 2,000 Americans. The attack on Pearl Harbor caused the United States to join World War II and is also remembered today as a tragedy in history.
Japan attacked the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor because they wanted to get rid of American threats in the Pacific. Japan wanted to capture Malaya and other places but they believed that the United States would try to interfere with their plans. In order to get them to not interfere, they took action and attacked Pearl Harbor.
who is responsible for the first world war
Answer:
The responsibility for the First World War is a complex and controversial issue. While there is no one single cause, many historians argue that a combination of factors, including nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and the complex web of alliances that existed between European powers, contributed to the outbreak of the war. Ultimately, the war was the result of a complex set of circumstances and decisions made by many different actors, and it is difficult to attribute responsibility to any one individual or country.
A nation that imposes a lot of tariffs is
attempting to do which of the following?
A. Increase the nation's global trade.
B. Increase the number of foreign goods in their own nation.
C. Increase the amount of other nations wanting to trade with them.
D. Increase the overall sales of their own nation's businesses.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
When a country imposes a tariff, it increases the price of imports, which causes consumers to have to pay more for foreign goods. This allows for domestic producers to keep their pricing at a competitive advantage.
important Islamic and Christian figures associated with the Crusades
Some important figures or people during the crusades:-
Alexius sent envoys to Pope Urban II asking for mercenary troops from the West to help confront the Turkish threat. the Teutonic Knights, and the Hospitallers. These groups defended the Holy Land and protected pilgrims traveling to and from the region.Raymond of Saint-GillesGodfrey of Bouillon Hugh of Vermandois Bohemond of Taranto (with his nephew Tancred)Any agreement or effort between two parties
Any agreement or effort between two parties is called a Bilateral effort or a Bilateral agreement.
Agreements or efforts can take many forms, such as a contract, a treaty, a memorandum of understanding, or a joint venture. The terms of agreement or effort may be negotiated and agreed upon through formal or informal discussions and may be binding or non-binding depending on the circumstances and the parties involved.
Examples of bilateral agreements could include a business partnership, a divorce settlement, a labor contract, a loan agreement or a peace treaty between two countries. Such agreements or efforts can be important for achieving common goals, resolving disputes or establishing mutual benefits.
To learn more about the agreement visit:
brainly.com/question/15420974
The correct question is-
What is the term for "Any agreement or effort between two parties"?
which of the
following is TRUE about life in Boston during this time period?
a. It was a small, relatively undeveloped town of mostly farms.
b. The British forces lacked organization and weapons.
c. American women took an active role in the violence between the British and the
colonists.
d. One of the Patriots killed at the Boston Massacre was a free Black man
Answer:
Explanation:
c. American women took an active role in the violence between the British and the
colonists.
one of the most violent battles in the pacific, the united states attained 3 airfields at this battle needed to continually bomb the japanese mainland.
Answer:
Battle of Iwo Jima
Explanation:
one of the most violent battles in the pacific, the united states attained 3 airfields at this battle needed to continually bomb the japanese mainland
Do you think it was a good idea by the chinese government to make the civil service exam an available requirement to hold some of the higher government jobs?? Why or why not? Discuss in detail.
Answer:
Yes, I think it's a very good idea.
Explanation:
People in Higher government position will be tasked with the duty to allocate the money accumulated through people's taxes and use it to create programs that benefited the people.
This require high level of intelligence and deep understanding in how various sectors operated in the country.
Civil service exam is a good idea that can be used to weed out bad candidates and only include candidates who have real potential to be trusted into the important position.
which was not an advantage of the british forces at the beginning of the war
WOT dora
Question 11 of 14
What was one major weakness of the Articles of Confederation?
A. It failed to organize non-state territories.
B. It made passing new laws difficult.
c. It allowed the Congress to set high tax rates.
D. It took most power away from the states.
SUBMIT
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Tell me if wrong
Directions: A recent trend in college housing is offering dorms themed around minority communities. For example, U.C. Berkeley offers Native American, Asian Pacific American, and African American themed dorms. Reed college in Portland, Oregon offers themed dorms for minority students, intended, according to their website, to allow "students of color to heal together from systemic white supremacy." Stanford has "ethnic themed dorms" that focus on Latino, African American, Native American, and Asian American cultures. While advocates (people in favor) of these dorms say other races aren't necessarily excluded and that they provide minority students with safe, prejudice-free spaces; others argue that the dorms promote segregation and will ultimately harm racial relations.
Based on your knowledge of history and your personal experiences, write an essay that discusses the possible positives and negatives of these living arrangements. Consider the following:
Do you think these dorms an example of segregation? Why or why not?
Do you think these dorms will help or harm racial relations? Why?
What historical events might have influenced schools to create these spaces?
Do you think these dorms are an effective way to fight prejudice? Why or why not?
!!WILL GIVE MORE BRAINLY POINTS!!400
Answer:
I will explain to you later ok
Explanation:
5.17 The First Administrations Unit Test Answers!
Does anyone have the 100% correct answers?
K12
80 Points!
Answer:
have you gotten the help you needed?
Explanation:
Answer: B, A, B, C, A, C, C, A, B, C,
Explanation: I took the test!!!!
How would the Morrill act and the pacific railway act impact westward movement?
Answer:
Reduced the travel time across the continent from several months to one week
Explanation:
The legislative efforts that resulted in the Pacific Railway Act led to the successful completion of the transcontinental railroad, which reduced the travel time across the continent from several months to one week and is considered one of the greatest technological achievements of the 19th century.
how did the haptin panic change America? what was so important about this event?
Answer:
Explanation:
The "Halloween Panic" or "War of the Worlds Panic," often referred to as the Orson Welles Panic, was a significant event in American history that took place on October 30, 1938. The event was a radio broadcast adaptation of H.G. Wells' science fiction novel "The War of the Worlds," which described a Martian invasion of Earth. The broadcast was so realistic that it caused widespread panic and hysteria among listeners who believed it was an actual news broadcast.
The impact of the panic was significant, as it showed how powerful the media can be in shaping public opinion and emotions. The incident led to a renewed focus on the regulation of radio broadcasting and censorship. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was established in 1934, but the "Halloween Panic" highlighted the need for tighter controls on the content of radio broadcasts.
The incident also highlighted the power of propaganda and the need for responsible media practices. The broadcast created a sense of fear and panic among the public, which showed how vulnerable people can be to sensational and false information.
Furthermore, the "Halloween Panic" demonstrated the impact of the media on mass psychology, and it became a case study for understanding the psychology of mass hysteria. The event was studied by psychologists and sociologists to understand how people react to frightening and uncertain situations.
In conclusion, the "Halloween Panic" was an event that changed America by bringing to light the power of the media and the need for responsible media practices. The incident highlighted the importance of regulation and censorship in radio broadcasting, the impact of propaganda on public opinion and mass psychology, and the vulnerability of people to sensational and false information. The event remains an important case study in understanding the psychology of mass hysteria and the impact of the media on society.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Why couldn’t the greeks city-sates see each other often?
Answer:
...https://history.stackexchange.com › questions › why-di.
Explanation:
go to that web sight and read it good luck
Read the sentence.
The invention of [blank] helped people migrate from place to place.
Which best completes the sentence?
O electricity
O indoor plumbing
O assembly lines
O automobiles
Answer: Automobiles
Explanation: People started using cars to get from place to place.
no freedom is unlimited how can you say so
Answer:
You are correct that no freedom is unlimited. While people have the right to certain freedoms, these rights come with certain limits and responsibilities. For example, freedom of speech is protected under many legal systems, but this does not mean that people can say anything without consequences. There are limits to free speech, such as when it poses a clear and present danger to others, when it is used to incite violence, or when it violates the rights of others.
Similarly, freedom of movement is a fundamental right, but it is subject to limitations such as curfews, border restrictions, and travel bans in the interest of national security or public health. The freedom to own property is also protected, but this does not mean that people can use their property in any way they wish without limits. Governments can regulate the use of private property to protect the environment or public health.
Therefore, while we all have certain rights and freedoms, they come with limits and responsibilities that ensure that our actions do not harm others or infringe on their rights.
Which American opposed imperialism?
Answer:
American Anti-Imperialist League, opposed imperialism on the grounds that it conflicted with the American ideal of Republicans and the “consent of the governed.”
Explanation:
why West Berliners did not accept the food that was made available to them from East Berlin. (2 x 2)
Answer:
Explanation:
West Berliners did not accept food from East Berlin during the Cold War for several reasons. Firstly, the food was seen as being of lower quality and less desirable compared to what was available in West Berlin. East Berlin was under the control of the communist government of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) and was subject to shortages and rationing, which meant that the food produced there was often seen as being of a lower standard.
Secondly, accepting food from East Berlin would have been seen as a political statement, and many West Berliners did not want to be associated with the communist government or support its policies. The division between East and West Berlin was symbolic of the wider division between the communist and democratic worlds, and many West Berliners saw accepting food from East Berlin as a form of endorsement of the communist regime.
Finally, there were concerns about the safety of the food from East Berlin, as it was thought that the communist government might have used it as a means of poisoning or otherwise harming the population of West Berlin. These fears were fueled by the wider Cold War tensions and mistrust between the communist and democratic worlds, and contributed to the refusal of West Berliners to accept food from East Berlin.
Overall, the rejection of food from East Berlin by West Berliners was driven by a combination of factors, including concerns about quality, political associations, and fears about the safety of the food.
What does it mean in the D.O.I when it says "Governments are instituted among men to secure these rights?"
In the Declaration of Independence(D.O.I), the phrase means that the primary purpose of establishing governments is to protect and safeguard the natural rights of individuals.
The phrase "Governments are instituted among men to secure these rights" is taken from the passage of D.O.I which states that all men are created equal.
It further states that the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, are inherent and unalienable, meaning they cannot be taken away or denied by any government or authority.
As per this declaration, governments are formed with the consent of the people to ensure that these fundamental rights are upheld and protected.
Thus, when the phrase in the D.O.I, "Governments are instituted among men to secure these rights" is referred to, it means the protection of natural rights.
Learn more about the Declaration of Independence here:
https://brainly.com/question/30410454
#SPJ1
5. Why was the railroad industry against Jim Crow laws that forced racial segregation in transportation?
Answer:The railroad industry was not uniformly against Jim Crow laws that forced racial segregation in transportation. While there were certainly individuals and groups within the industry who opposed these laws on moral or practical grounds, the industry as a whole did not take a unified stance. However, there were a few reasons why some individuals and factions within the railroad industry may have been against Jim Crow laws:
Business considerations: The railroad industry relied on passenger traffic for revenue, and imposing racial segregation could potentially limit the number of passengers and thus affect profits. Segregation policies meant that African Americans were restricted to separate and often inferior accommodations, which could lead to decreased ridership from the African American population. Some in the industry may have recognized the economic impact of segregation and opposed it for business reasons.
Operational efficiency: Implementing and enforcing racial segregation required additional resources, such as separate cars, facilities, and personnel, which could increase costs and complicate operations. Some within the railroad industry may have preferred a more streamlined and efficient approach to transportation without the added burden of segregation.
Public image and reputation: The railroad industry, like any business, aimed to maintain a positive public image. Supporting or implementing racial segregation could tarnish the industry's reputation and lead to public backlash, especially considering the growing sentiment against segregation during the Civil Rights era. Some in the industry may have been concerned about the negative impact on their public image and preferred to distance themselves from discriminatory practices.
It's important to note that while there may have been individuals or factions within the railroad industry who opposed Jim Crow laws, the industry as a whole was not united in its stance. Additionally, many aspects of the railroad industry did enforce segregation during the era of Jim Crow laws, as they were legally required to do so.
Explanation:
the supreme court’s ruling in brown vs. board of education commonlit answers
According to the Browns, for education to be equitable, children from all racial backgrounds must attend the same school and have access to the same facilities and opportunities.
How is Brown v. Board of Education affecting society today?In the landmark case Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that American state laws requiring racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated institutions are otherwise of similar quality.
But Brown also had an unanticipated result, and the effects of that are still being felt today: it prompted a number of seasoned, highly trained black educators who worked in schools with only black children to resign, be demoted, or lose their jobs.
Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education: https://brainly.com/question/14637388
#SPJ1
ia history- To What Extent Did Johnsons Policy of VietnamizationAffect Vietnam During the Cold War?
Johnson's policy of Vietnamization, which aimed to reduce American troop levels in Vietnam by gradually handing over combat operations to the South Vietnamese army, had a significant impact on Vietnam during the Cold War. It increased the South Vietnamese army's size and self-confidence, but it also contributed to the country's instability and increased the fighting between the Vietnamese. However, the South Vietnamese military was eventually overwhelmed, and the Communist North won the war in 1975.
During the Cold War, Johnson's policy of Vietnamization affected Vietnam to a significant degree. Vietnamization, which was announced in 1969, sought to reduce American troop levels in Vietnam by gradually handing over combat operations to the South Vietnamese army. The United States' failure to win the war had left its citizens tired and the country's economy and military strained.
Johnson hoped that Vietnamization would provide an opportunity for the United States to gracefully leave the conflict while still preserving South Vietnam's independence and preventing a Communist takeover.Johnson's policy of Vietnamization had a significant impact on Vietnam's history during the Cold War. To begin with, it increased South Vietnam's army and increased their self-confidence.
he South Vietnamese army, trained by American military advisors, was given more authority and weaponry, which increased their ability to fight the Vietcong. South Vietnamese soldiers, on the other hand, were frequently ill-equipped and not properly trained to take on the Vietcong's guerrilla tactics, which resulted in many military and civilian casualties. Furthermore, the policy of Vietnamization increased the fighting between the Vietnamese.
The policy of Vietnamization fostered resentment among South Vietnamese soldiers who believed that they were being left to fight on their own against an extremely organized Vietcong, and this contributed to the country's instability, and the conflict continued well after the United States' departure. However, the South Vietnamese military was eventually overwhelmed, and the Communist North won the war in 1975.
For more such questions on Cold War, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/25774915
#SPJ8
define write a brief definition for the term migration.
Zoroastrianism was a ___________________ religion.
Answer:
Iranian
Explanation:
Answer: iranian
Explanation: i have no clue if i spelled that right
Where is The Who and the why see
Answer:who is there and the see
Explanation: