What was the cause of the French Revolution

In the Ptolemaic Model, the earth was the realm of nature and man, but the celestial sphere with its "fixed" stars was the Sun.

This is known to be the Model of the universe where Ptolemy was siad to have  placed the Earth at the key point or main point of his geocentric model.

In the Ptolemaic Model, the earth was the realm of nature and man, but the celestial sphere with its "fixed" stars with different distances all appear to lie on the celestial sphere. The fixed star was the sun.

Learn more about Ptolemaic model  from

https://brainly.com/question/14703454

#SPJ1

Answer:

1) The Northwest Ordinance

2) States' Rights

3) Missouri compromise

4) The Abolitionist Movement

5) The Fugitive Slave Act

6) Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin

7) Kansas Nebraska Act

8) Bleeding Kansas

9) Dred Scott's decision

10) Harper's Ferry

11) Lincon's election

12) The succession of the southern states

Explanation:

(It's from earliest to latest) (sorry if wrong it a while so branliest would be appreciated)

Hope this helps! Please let me know if you need more help or think my answer is incorrect. Brainliest would be MUCH appreciated. Have a wonderful day!

Answer:

I don't know for sure, but my guess is either "diversified economies that make many different types of products." or "command economies, in which the central government makes all basic economic decisions."

Explanation:

If I am incorrect, please put a bad rate so that other people don't get it wrong. Thanks! Hope this helps!!!

Defining social justice and the accompanying ethical obligations is a process that requires addressing several topics, including human rights policies and practices, allocation of scarce resources, and the relationship between means and ends. It involves ensuring equitable access to fundamental rights, resources, and opportunities for all members of society. A social justice approach to these topics requires equitable distribution based on needs and methods that are non-discriminatory and have a positive impact on the community.

Social justice is defined as a concept of fair and equal access to opportunities, resources, and rights for all members of society, regardless of their social status, race, ethnicity, gender, or any other distinguishing characteristic. Defining social justice requires the consideration of the accompanying ethical obligations to promote it. This is an ongoing process that involves addressing several topics, including human rights policies and practice, allocation of scarce resources, and the relationship between means and ends.

A. Human Rights Policies and Practice
One of the critical areas in defining social justice is human rights policies and practices. This involves ensuring that every member of society is accorded the same fundamental rights, including the right to education, healthcare, and a decent living standard, among others. A social justice approach to human rights policies and practice requires the consideration of equitable access to these rights, especially among the vulnerable and marginalized groups in society.

B. Allocation of Scarce Resources
Another important aspect of defining social justice is the allocation of scarce resources. In most cases, resources are unevenly distributed, and there is a need for social justice to address these disparities. A social justice approach to allocation of scarce resources involves equitable distribution based on needs rather than a person's social status or position in society.

C. The Relationship Between Means and Ends
The relationship between means and ends is another essential topic in defining social justice. This refers to the methods used to achieve a particular goal and the impact on the community. A social justice approach to means and ends requires that the methods used to achieve a goal must be fair and non-discriminatory, and the impact on the community must be positive.

For more such questions on social justice, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/15835405

#SPJ8

Answer:

In addition, the United Nations identified three mega-trends related to globalization: shifts in production and labor markets, rapid advances in technology, and climate change.

One specific development related to economic globalization in the period circa 1945-2000 was the establishment and growth of multinational corporations (MNCs).

Globalization generally lowers production costs. This enables businesses to provide consumers with items at a lesser cost. A significant factor in rising standards of living is the average cost of commodities. Additionally, there are more products available to consumers.

Many businesses grew to be global enterprises during this time by expanding their operations outside of their home nations. MNCs collaborated with local businesses in other nations through the establishment of subsidiaries, joint ventures, and other types of cooperation in order to create and market their goods and services.

They were able to take advantage of cheaper manufacturing costs in various parts of the world, reach new markets, and access new resources as a result. As more goods and services were sold across borders, MNC growth also aided in the expansion of global trade. This breakthrough sparked rapid economic growth and development, but it also sparked worries about how MNCs would affect regional economies, labor laws, and the environment.

Learn more about economic globalization here:

https://brainly.com/question/29431752

#SPJ2

A general overview of the political background of the United States' inclusion in international organizations.

The United States' decision to join an international organization is typically influenced by a combination of political, economic, and strategic factors. Historically, the United States has been actively involved in various international organizations, such as the United Nations (UN), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and many others. Support for America joining an organization can come from different quarters.

It often depends on the perceived benefits and alignment of objectives. Supporters of U.S. inclusion may include policymakers, diplomats, internationalists, business leaders, and advocates of global cooperation. They believe that participating in international organizations allows the United States to promote its interests, exercise influence, foster diplomatic relations, and address global challenges through multilateral cooperation.

On the other hand, opposition to U.S. involvement in an organization can also exist. Critics may argue that membership could compromise national sovereignty, limit policy autonomy, or impose burdensome financial obligations. Opposition may come from political factions, isolationists, skeptics of international cooperation, or those who believe that the organization's agenda or actions contradict U.S. interests or values.

It is important to note that the specific political background, supporters, and opponents can vary depending on the organization and the particular context surrounding U.S. involvement. the political background of the United States' inclusion in international organizations, considering some specific examples.

United Nations (UN): The United States played a pivotal role in the establishment of the UN in 1945 and has been a member since its inception. Supporters of U.S. membership emphasized the need for collective security, international cooperation, and the promotion of peace and stability.

They believed that active participation in the UN would enhance American influence, provide a platform to address global challenges, and safeguard U.S. interests. However, there have been critics who argue that the UN infringes on national sovereignty or that it is biased against U.S. interests, leading to occasional opposition from certain political factions.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): The United States was a founding member of NATO in 1949. Supporters of U.S. involvement saw NATO as a means to deter Soviet aggression during the Cold War, protect European allies, and promote stability in the region. NATO has generally enjoyed broad bipartisan support in the United States, with proponents highlighting its importance for transatlantic security cooperation.

However, some critics argue that NATO burdens the United States with disproportionate military and financial commitments, leading to occasional debates about the costs and benefits of U.S. participation World Trade Organization (WTO): The United States has been a member of the WTO since its establishment in 1995. Supporters of U.S. membership view the WTO as a vital platform for promoting global trade, reducing barriers, and resolving trade disputes. They argue that U.S. participation helps protect American businesses, ensure market access, and enforce fair trade practices.

Opposition to the WTO or specific trade agreements can arise from those who believe they negatively impact domestic industries or workers, leading to debates over trade policy and the balance between free trade and protectionism. It is important to note that the political background, supporters, and opponents can vary depending on the specific organization, geopolitical context, and prevailing domestic political dynamics. Different administrations or political parties may hold varying perspectives on the value of international organizations and their alignment with U.S. interests.

To know more about political background ,click

brainly.com/question/30687787

Answer:

To keep the country at peace with the rest of Europe, unite the country and make it strong

Explanation:

Answer:They cannot vote or lobby or run for public office, so politicians have scant incentive to think about them. They can’t bargain or trade with us, so they have little representation in the market, And they can’t make their views heard directly: they can’t tweet, or write articles in newspapers, or march in the streets. They are utterly disenfranchised.

Explanation:

hope it helps :)

When a real estate agent emphasizes the importance of "location, location, location," they are referring to one of the fundamental aspects of nonprice competition in the real estate market.

Nonprice competition refers to the ways in which businesses differentiate themselves from their competitors through factors other than price, such as quality, service, or, in this case, location. In the context of real estate, the location of a property can greatly affect its desirability and value, regardless of its actual features or amenities.

This is because location can impact a range of factors, including accessibility, proximity to amenities, safety, and even the prestige associated with a certain area location.

Therefore, the real estate market can be considered an example of monopolistic competition, location where businesses differentiate themselves based on nonprice factors.

Learn more about nonprice competition here

https://brainly.com/question/29753282

#SPJ1

Answer:

Practice

Look at the pictures and write about Faris's day. Use time words

35words 40words * 50 words ***

TUD

Writing checkout

Olused capital letters at the beginning of sentences. Olsusea finger espace between e

Agriculture is our chief employment; and every one, even the children and women, are engaged in it. Thus we are all habituated to labour from our earliest years. Every one contributes something to the common stock; and as we are unacquainted with idleness, we have no beggars. The benefits of such a mode of living are obvious.

Answer:

the answer is to show chronological relationship between events

Explanation:

Answer:

she's with yo mama.

Explanation:

I am all and well knowing. -_-

Answer:

To Flim Twilight bella swan

The new administration was ratified by the states in March 1781 after the Continental Congress transmitted the Articles to them two days later. Despite being written to unite the 13 colonies, the Articles of Confederation produced a highly decentralized system of governance that gave the states and the national legislature the majority of power.

The Congress, established by the Articles of Confederation, was given the authority to declare war, appoint officers, negotiate treaties, form alliances, name ambassadors to foreign countries, and regulate relations with Indians.

Despite being written to unite the colonies, the Articles of Confederation produced a highly decentralized system of governance that gave the national assembly and the states the lion's share of authority.

To know more about national government visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/7576487

#SPJ1

Answer:

B, Animal Furs

Explanation:

French traders originallyorginaly came to Canada for the furs such as beaver furs.

Answer:

Virginia's Declaration of Rights was drawn upon by Thomas Jefferson for the opening paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. It was widely copied by the other colonies and became the basis of the Bill of Rights. Written by George Mason, it was adopted by the Virginia Constitutional Convention on June 12, 1776

Explanation:

Answer:

Hoping to inspire soldiers and save his own job, Washington ordered all his officers to read Thomas Paine's "The American Crisis" to their troops. Paine, the passionate pamphleteer, was embedded with Washington's troops and had just written a now-famous essay on the back of a drumhead.

Explanation:

ta-daaa!!!!!

Answer:

Washington ordered all his officers to read Thomas Paine's "The American Crisis" to their troops.

Explanation:

hopefully this helped!

The timing is right for a history like this. The World War II generation is dying out, and America has reacted with a wave of patriotic nostalgia. Books such as Tom Brokaw’s “The Greatest Generation” and movies such as “Saving Private Ryan” are celebrating the “good war” against the Axis and the virtues that won it as they haven’t been celebrated in decades. This is natural, even laudable, but it runs the risk of re-sanctifying and re-whitewashing what, as UC Berkeley ethnic studies professor Ronald Takaki reminds us, was a very complex experience.

Takaki’s survey of the war’s impact on Americans of African, Japanese, Mexican, Chinese, Jewish, Korean, Indian, German, Italian and Native origin reaches two conclusions. The first is that the battle against Nazi racism exposed America’s own prejudices as peacetime never could. The ironies were glaring: Why should minorities fight a “white man’s war” in segregated armed forces on behalf of a country that denied them equal rights and, in some cases, citizenship? That they fought anyway--with conspicuous gallantry--put the country in their moral debt.

The second is that World War II gave many minority Americans--and women of all races--an economic and psychological boost. The needs of defense industries, and President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s desire to counter Axis propaganda, opened skilled, high-paying jobs to people who had never had a chance at them before. Minority workers and soldiers made unprecedented contact with other minorities as well as with whites. Feelings of self-confidence and belonging, once enjoyed, were not easily relinquished. In short, Takaki says, the war jump-started the civil rights movement.

Takaki takes his title from a letter to the Pittsburgh Courier written in 1942 by James G. Thompson, an African American cafeteria worker who later served in the Army. Referring to the popular “V for victory” sign, Thompson said: “Let we colored Americans adopt the double VV for a double victory. The first V for victory over our enemies from without, the second V for victory over our enemies from within--those who perpetrate these ugly prejudices.”

“Double Victory” reconsiders some of the war’s most troubling questions. Why did the United States intern 120,000 Japanese Americans when there was no evidence of their disloyalty, yet largely leave German and Italian Americans alone? Why were immigration quotas on Jews from Europe upheld and shiploads of refugees from the Nazis turned away? Why didn’t the Allies bomb the rail lines to Auschwitz and otherwise disrupt the death-camp system once its existence was confirmed? Where logic fails, Takaki argues, the only explanation is racism.

Still, the picture Takaki gives us isn’t uniformly bleak. Nothing about the war was simple, he asserts. Korean Americans reacted to news of Pearl Harbor with joy--war with Japan meant eventual independence for their homeland--even though bigots often mistook them for Japanese. Long-oppressed Chinese Californians suddenly became “friends” because China was fighting Japan. Mexican Americans suffered the “Zoot Suit Riots” in Los Angeles in 1943, but gained respect because of their high casualty rate in the war.

Indeed, “Double Victory” would make a good high school textbook. It’s brief and clear. It tells familiar stories--the Navajo code talkers, the Japanese American 442nd Regimental Combat Team--in less detail than specialists would want, but it puts all the stories into one set of covers and in a revealing context. Some of Takaki’s conclusions will be disputed--particularly his assertion that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was unnecessary--but his portraits of Roosevelt, having to be prodded into doing the right but politically risky thing and then doing it halfheartedly, and of President Harry S. Truman, his “buck-stops-here” facade hiding his genuine horror over the A-bombing, are convincingly nuanced.

When the US entered World War 2 in the late 1941, the largest racial minority group on the US was black Americans.

They made up about ten % of the general population. After being freed from slavery only the some generations earlier, blacks still faced daily racial discrimination. on the South, where seventy five % of black Americans were lived, racism was particularly not good.

In so many Southern states the so-called Jim Crow laws enforced legalized segregation (the separation of blacks or whites) in public places such as schools, theaters, or restaurants.

In the North, urban ghettos (a section of the city where minorities live, often with overcrowding or poverty) or slums were growing like to the blacks migrated from the rural South by seek jobs.

The National Association of the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) or other organizations fought discrimination and segregation, but progress was low.

Learn more about discrimination here https://brainly.com/question/14896067

#SPJ2

Answer:

President Andrew Jackson informed Congress on the progress of the removal of Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi River to land in the west

Explanation:

archivesgov

Answer:

Vietnam war had an effect on the Pacific Northwest

The 1920s were a time when most women who stayed home needed a college education and had fewer home products to use. The correct option is b and d.

The 1920s was a challenging time for American women. Women were expected to raise children, keep house, provide emotional support for their husbands, and in myriad ways, contribute to American society. However, during the twenties, those demands came to seem less and less compatible. Rather than having large families with many children, most families were choosing to have just a few children. Typically the husband worked outside the home while the 1920s housewife tended to household chores.

Some of the chores she was responsible for included sewing, cooking, cleaning, and child care.

Learn more about women, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14452855

#SPJ1

While Woodrow initially campaigned as a progressive, his actions during the war and his pursuit of the League of Nations reveal a mixed record in terms of staying true to progressivism.

Woodrow Wilson's wartime leadership and his advocacy for the League of Nations can be evaluated in the context of progressivism.  One of Wilson's Fourteen Points which was part of his vision for peace after World War I, can be viewed as progressive.

The fifth point called for the "free, open-minded, and absolutely impartial adjustment of all colonial claims." This point aligns with the principles of progressivism, as it emphasizes self-determination, equality, and fairness. By advocating for the decolonization and self-governance of colonies, Wilson demonstrated a commitment to progressive ideals.

Read more about Woodrow Wilson

brainly.com/question/4112868

#SPJ1

Answer:

its b

Explanation:

just did the quiz

Answer:The Battle of Plassey was a decisive victory of the British East India Company over the Nawab of Bengal and his French[1] allies on 23 June 1757, under the leadership of Robert Clive. The victory was made possible by the defection of Mir Jafar, who was Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah's commander-in-chief. The battle helped the British East India Company take control of Bengal. Over the next hundred years, they seized control of most of the rest of the Indian subcontinent, including Burma.

Explanation:

Answer:

USS constitution

Explanation: