what was the main difference between the czech and the Romanian revolutions​

Answer:

Explanation:

"Give me liberty, or give me death!" is a quotation attributed to American politician and orator Patrick Henry from a speech he made to the Second Virginia Convention on March 23, 1775, at St. John's Church in Richmond, Virginia.

Answer:

the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished

Explanation:

Answer: Both Athens and Sparta had an assembly, whose members were elected by the people. Sparta was ruled by two kings, who ruled until they died or were forced out of office. Athens was ruled by archons, who were elected annually.

The Interplay between the Rise of Civilizations and Belief Systems:

For more such questions on  Interplay

https://brainly.com/question/721753

#SPJ8

Answer:

Explanation:

The Interplay between the Rise of Civilizations and Belief Systems:

The rise of civilizations and the development of belief systems are two intertwined phenomena that have shaped human history. Civilizations represent complex societies characterized by advancements in social, political, and economic organization, while belief systems encompass the spiritual, philosophical, and religious frameworks that guide people's thoughts, behaviors, and values.

Similarities between the Rise of Civilizations and Belief Systems : Societal Organization: Both the rise of civilizations and the development of belief systems involve the establishment of societal structures and hierarchies. Civilizations require organized governance, economic systems, and social classes to function effectively. Similarly, belief systems often provide guidelines for societal order, moral principles, and codes of conduct.

Cultural Identity: Both phenomena contribute to the formation of cultural identity. Civilizations cultivate distinctive traditions, languages, art, and literature that shape their cultural heritage. Belief systems, on the other hand, influence cultural practices, rituals, and values, providing a sense of identity and cohesion within a society.

The rise of civilizations and the development of belief systems mutually influence each other. Belief systems can shape the trajectory of a civilization by influencing its laws, moral codes, and social norms. For instance, ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia and Egypt were deeply influenced by their polytheistic religions, which guided their political structures and societal practices.

Conversely, the rise of civilizations can also impact the development and dissemination of belief systems. As societies become more complex and interconnected, the exchange of ideas and beliefs becomes possible through trade, conquest, or cultural diffusion. This can lead to the spread and adaptation of belief systems across different civilizations, as seen in the diffusion of Buddhism from India to various parts of Asia.

The rise of civilizations and the development of belief systems are intricately linked, with each influencing and shaping the other. While civilizations provide the infrastructure and societal framework for belief systems to flourish, belief systems provide moral guidance, cultural identity, and social cohesion within civilizations. This dynamic interplay between the two has been a significant force in human history, contributing to the diversity of civilizations and the evolution of belief systems throughout time.

Answer:

It’s important to get wide support for US foreign policy decisions

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I got it right

PEEL for agreeing that Elizabeth I was a great Queen:

Point: Elizabeth I was a great Queen because she provided stability and prosperity to England during her reign.

Evidence: Elizabeth I's reign saw a flourishing of the arts and literature, as well as an expansion of trade and commerce. She also successfully navigated religious tensions and prevented foreign invasion, such as the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588.

Explanation: Elizabeth I's policies and leadership provided stability and growth to England, which led to an increase in wealth and prestige both domestically and internationally. Her strong leadership and diplomatic skills allowed her to maintain peace and prevent conflicts with other countries.

Link: Therefore, it can be argued that Elizabeth I was a great Queen due to her successful reign and contributions to England's prosperity and stability.

PEEL for disagreeing that Elizabeth I was a great Queen:

Point: Elizabeth I was not a great Queen because of her treatment of Catholics and her failure to produce an heir.

Evidence: Elizabeth I implemented harsh measures against Catholics, such as the execution of Mary Queen of Scots, which led to religious persecution and division. Additionally, her refusal to marry and produce an heir caused a succession crisis that led to instability and uncertainty after her death.

Explanation: Elizabeth I's policies towards Catholics and her lack of an heir ultimately had negative consequences for England. Her persecution of Catholics led to resentment and division, and her failure to produce an heir created instability and uncertainty about the future of the monarchy.

Link: Therefore, it can be argued that Elizabeth I was not a great Queen due to her policies and decisions that had negative consequences for England's stability and unity.

I don't have personal opinions. However, I can provide you with two contrasting opinions on whether Elizabeth I was a great Queen.

Opinion 1: Elizabeth I was a great Queen.

- Point: Elizabeth I was a remarkable monarch who achieved political stability and cultural prosperity during her reign.

- Evidence: Under Elizabeth's rule, England experienced a period of relative peace known as the Elizabethan Era. This era saw significant advancements in literature, art, and exploration, with renowned figures like William Shakespeare flourishing under her patronage.

- Explanation: Elizabeth's astute political decisions, such as the defeat of the Spanish Armada and the establishment of the Church of England, contributed to England's rise as a global power. Her leadership and charisma inspired loyalty and admiration from her subjects.

- Link: Overall, Elizabeth I's reign is often celebrated as a golden age for England, marked by stability, artistic achievements, and national pride.

Opinion 2: Elizabeth I was not a great Queen.

- Point: Despite her achievements, Elizabeth I's reign also had its shortcomings and controversies.

- Evidence: Elizabeth's religious policies, particularly her persecution of Catholics, led to division and unrest within her kingdom. Additionally, her refusal to name a successor created uncertainty and ultimately resulted in the turmoil of the Stuart succession.

- Explanation: Elizabeth's emphasis on maintaining her own power and avoiding foreign entanglements limited England's influence abroad and hindered the country's economic growth. Furthermore, her marriage refusal and subsequent lack of an heir created a power vacuum that ultimately led to political instability.

- Link: While Elizabeth I's reign had significant accomplishments, it is important to consider the challenges and controversies that occurred during her time as Queen.

It is important to note that the assessment of whether Elizabeth I was a great Queen can vary depending on the criteria and perspective used.

I belive that the answer is D. because a Sahel is not A. "an African territory of historical importance". It is not B. "a landform found only in Africa, it is a cross between a mountain and a plateau" It is not C. "a climatic event with high winds and heavy rains". But it is correct that it is "a wide area of dry land located along the southern edge of the Sahara". which makes it D.

Answer:

a i think

Explanation:

its  definetly not c and i dont think its b

Answer:

I would say C

Explanation:

Option C shows the most impact of the media on the public opinion.

A just reflects the public opionion not really the influence it

B This can narrow the public opinion but option C has more impact

D does not have much to do with impact or influence

Answer3:4 occasions can be Birthday, Christmas, New Baby or Thank You .

Explanation:

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

im learning this rn

Answer:  

The Old Kingdom of Ancient Egypt is the foundation upon which all of Egypt’s long and storied history has been built. It was during this period from 2686 to 2181 BC when people living in the Nile Valley first began to produce the art and architecture that we still count among the most impressive ancient feats in history. Ancient Egypt consists of small regional chiefdoms with separate gods, rulers and government before the old kingdom establishment.

The “Old Kingdom” is a timeline during the ancient Egypt. It ruled ancient egypt from 2575 BC to 2150 BC which consists of 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Dynasties with 25 Pharaohs.The fourth and fifth dynasty  were the main old kingdom dynasties while some archaeologists consider the third dynasty as a critical period.

over 400 years, Egypt had a strong central government and economy. The  most famous about Ancient Egypt Old Kingdom is the built of the pyramids thus, it called the “age of the pyramids” or “age of the pyramid builders”

Explanation:

Answer:

which old kingdom?

Answer:  Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister and activist who was one of the most prominent leaders in the American civil rights movement from 1955 until his assassination on April 4, 1968. Martin Luther King, Jr. was also a civil rights legend. In the mid-1950s, King led the movement to end segregation and counter prejudice in the United States through the means of peaceful protest.

Answer:

Martin Luther king Jr was a social activist and baptist

minister in the united states' in the 1950s and 60s .

he was the right to vote.

Answer:

The Industrial Revolution led to imperialism in ways such as creating the demand for raw materials, which would be turned into products in factories, and providing the means to transport those raw materials with inventions such as the steam engine.

These new industrialized nations needed more raw materials to fuel their mass production and population growth. In order to maximize the countries profits, these industrialized nations went out to find nations that they could exploit natural resources and cheap labor from thus leading to imperialism.

Answer:

Explanation:

Clovis is also significant due to his conversion to Catholicism during 496,  the behest of his wife, Clotilde, who would next venerated since a martyr as the act, celebrated now in both the Roman Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodox Church. Clovis had was baptized on Christmas Day in 508.

The Hebrews were monotheists who believed in only one god, while the Sumerians and Egyptians believed in many gods (they were polytheists).

Answer:

a

Explanation:

The best place to move to maximize your ability to harvest wind power would be the B. Rocky Mountain area.

This area has some of the highest wind speeds in the United States, and it is also relatively free of obstructions, such as trees and buildings, that can interfere with wind power generation.

The southeastern swamps, southwestern deserts, and Gulf coast region are all windy areas, but they also have more obstructions that can interfere with wind power generation.

For example, the southeastern swamps are home to many trees, which can block the wind. The southwestern deserts are home to many mountains, which can also block the wind. And the Gulf coast region is home to many buildings, which can also block the wind.

Find out more on wind power at https://brainly.com/question/2031508

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Words We Hear

The first way God speaks is the one that’s most often associated with hearing his voice: words we hear. While we would all love to hear an ‘audible’ voice, hearing God’s voice speak in this way appears somewhat rare and particularly reserved for those moments when we’re about to step out into the traffic! The word ‘audible’ itself may indeed be a misnomer – according to my doctoral research, most of those who have experienced it, say it would not have been heard by those around them (See Waiting for God to Speak Out Loud? Think Again). Mostly it seems, the Spirit speaks to us inaudibly and internally – with a message that sounds much like our own thoughts – i.e the ‘still small voice’ of Elijah’s experience (1 Kings 19:9-13).

When God speaks in words, he may give us a single phrase or he may use full sentences. He may use a wordplay (eg. Jeremiah 1:11-12) or give us a riddle that calls us to ponder (Numbers 12:8). Often he’ll ask a question to get us thinking (1 Kings 19:9, 2 Chronicles 1:7) and as the conversation continues, he reveals something more significant later on.

2. Pictures We See

The second way God speaks is in pictures that we see. As God said through the prophet Jeremiah; “Which of them has stood in the council of the Lord to see or to hear his word?” (Jeremiah 23:18, italics mine). We hear his message through words, but we see his message through pictures.

At first, this may seem an unusual way to speak, but we need to remember picture language is the most basic of languages. When children first learn to read, we give them a picture book to practise with – not the Oxford Dictionary. Further, imagery is the most expressive way to communicate which is why it is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. Perhaps this is why God communicates in this way so often in the Scriptures, particularly in the Old Testament where dreams and visions comprise ⅓ of the content (Read: Dreams – God’s Favourite Form of Communication).

When God speaks in pictures, his message comes in dreams when we’re sleeping or visions when we’re awake. Sometimes the picture speaks symbolically and requires interpretation (see for example; The Meaning of Vehicles in Dreams). Other times, the scene is more literal.

Sometimes God’s visual messages are full of riddles, poetry and allegorical forms that are not easily interpreted or measurable. These can be compared to the parables of Jesus which use images or scenes to communicate an idea. Walton suggests that the reason word pictures are used by God is to engage the right side of our brains.1 (This idea was touched on in the podcast: Are Women Better at Hearing God’s Voice?)

Communication in picture form is a way of speaking that the Western church often finds difficult to accept. Writers like Dallas Willard2 and Wayne Grudem3 have gone so far to say it is not a valid way to hear God’s voice. The reasons are primarily historical – an unfortunate product of Reformation thinking that downplayed the so-called mystical forms of spiritual experience. In fact, imagery is the most common form of communication in the Scriptures and can be the most powerful and creative way of all (Read Why God Speaks in Dreams and Visions or listen to this podcast as an example).

3. Emotions We Feel

Finally, God’s messages may come packaged as emotions we feel. In other words, we sense what God is saying to us. The emotion of the Holy Spirit is felt physically and this in itself communicates a message.

So the presence of hope may invade us, comforting us and calling us forward (Galatians 5:22-23, 1 Corinthians 14:3). Peace becomes a guide to lead us (Colossians 3:15) and a deep-seated conviction may turn us around (John 16:8). A friend of mine with a ministry in healing often experiences a sense of sadness when she meets someone who the Holy Spirit wants to touch in a profound way.

One of the reasons why dreams can be such powerful communicators is because the emotion we experience in them becomes part of the message. Daniel felt deep anguish when he first experienced his visions (Daniel 10:1-9), John found himself weeping (Revelation 5:4) and Peter was revulsed by what he had seen in his trance (Acts 10:14). Of course on the other hand, feelings of guilt, shame, fear or condemnation are never a part of God’s communiqués to us.

So God speaks to us in words, pictures and emotions. There are other forms too – although these are not as common. In my doctoral studies, I’ve interviewed people who have heard from the Holy Spirit through the senses of taste and smell! God packages his message to us in a myriad of forms. He is a masterful communicator who knows how to get his message across to those who are listening.

Answer:

i only know the 1st one so far it's yes ill edit my answer when i figure out the other one

Explanation:

I do not believe that the legal driving age should be increased for all ages of people and due to geographical location, this could come as a disadvantage for many. Younger students and adults who live in rural areas would have to use public transport to get to school until they reached the new age. This could then become quite expensive and as school and university fees are extremely expensive as it is, this would be an extra expense that could go to more beneficial things. In the long run, having a car instead of using public transport would become quite useful because even though public transport is expensive, they might not go to the exact destination you require to go. This would then lead to extra travel expenses, as well as more of a hassle and extra stress - which no student ever needs. A simple cross-country train is anywhere from £40-£200+ and no student has this much money, especially in the current cost of living crisis. Young people are already struggling with high rents and the cost of education, they do not need the extra stress and financial problems due to the train fairs. If there were issues of pollution and people wanted to try and stop this cause by raising the legal driving age, then younger people could be encouraged to buy an electric car and could also be given financial help and support from the government to buy one.

However, the highest death rate for drivers is amongst the 17-25 age group, so raising the legal driving age, this would cut the number of deaths in young people and reduce the grief of family members. If this was to be raised, there would be a significant fall in fatalities arising from motor car use and this would have a significant economic benefit; more people wouldn't have to use an ambulance or be treated by the NHS, meaning the NHS's budget could be spent on treating people who's accidents couldn't have been prevented. There would also be significantly fewer drivers on the road, reducing congestion, reducing costs for firms, and ultimately helping save the environment as not as many petrol and diesel cars are polluting the earth. There would also be added health benefits, such as reducing obesity as drivers would be encouraged to use public transport which would involve walking to bus and train stations. People could also realise that for them, walking to their destination is less of a hassle than getting public transport so more people would end up walking.

Answer:

Explanation:

i did this and i got it right. so, i hope this helps.

Answer: decreased lawsuits I think

Explanation:

Answer:

According to ancient texts, Abraham and Sarah are considered to be the ancestors of the Israelites. They are believed to have received a divine promise from God that their descendants would become a great nation. This promise is seen as the foundation of the covenant between God and the Israelite people. Therefore, the Israelites traced their lineage back to Abraham and Sarah and considered them to be their patriarch and matriarch. However, Abraham and Sarah did not lead the Hebrews out of enslavement, as that role is traditionally attributed to Moses. Additionally, Abraham and Sarah were monotheists, not polytheists, and did not share polytheistic beliefs with the Israelites.

Answer:

1.''' General Washington decided not to impose a battlefield strategy on his field commanders''. The general consensus among historians is that Washington was a mediocre military strategist at best.  However, a recent study in the Academy of Management Journal cast some doubt on that consensus.

''Washington decided to oversee renovations on Mount Vernon during the most tenuous year of the Revolution.'' Imagine leading a comically outnumbered, under-resourced, and woefully unskilled force where the majority of your teenaged army marches throughout the New England snow barefoot because you can’t afford to buy them shoes in a war that—if lost—could send you to the gallows for treason.

3.'' Washington Decided not to make himself supreme ruler of the United States.'' After risking his life to lead the American Revolution—often bravely putting himself directly in the line of fire—Washington shocked the entire world by voluntarily returning all his powers to the American people and their elected representatives.  It was a decision that even led his recently defeated foe, King George III, to comment that Washington was “the greatest character of his generation.” We will never know whether this decision was driven by altruism or a self-interested desire to be adored by history.  What we do know is that decision aligned perfectly with the pattern of decisions Washington established

Explanation: