President Franklin D. Roosevelt launched a number of initiatives known as the "New Deal" to help Americans regain their prosperity during the Great Depression.
What were the 3 major programs of the New Deal?President Franklin D. Roosevelt launched a number of initiatives known as the "New Deal" to help Americans regain their prosperity during the Great Depression. When Roosevelt took office in 1933, he moved quickly to stabilize the economy, create jobs, and help people in need.
Congressional Emergency Relief Act (1933)
made the Federal Emergency Relief Administration exist (FERA).
lent money to states so they might finance regional humanitarian initiatives for the poor.
Federal Surplus Commodities Corporation (FSCC) (1933)
formerly known as the Federal Surplus Relief Corporation (1933–1935) and subsequently as the Federal Surplus Commodities Corporation (1935–1940), provided surplus food and other goods to individuals in need.
Numerous other benefit plans for employees of the rail sector are administered by the Railroad Retirement Board (1934), in addition to the Railroad Retirement Program.
appropriations for emergency relief (1935-1943)
provided money for New Deal labor organizations, particularly the Works Progress Administration (WPA).
Social Security Act (1935)
a nationwide system of pensions, unemployment insurance, and assistance for mothers with children was established, and the Social Security Administration (SSA) was established to oversee its administration.
To learn more about New Deal refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/936437
#SPJ4
Which of these is a major responsibility of members of Congress?
a
giving help to constituents
b
deciding who will receive federal grants
c
finding jobs for constitutents
d
providing analysis for the CBO
Answer:
the right answer is A answer
Which statement best describes a representative democracy?
A.
Citizens don't vote, and decisions are made in the government without their input.
B.
Citizens elect officials who express voters' interests in the government.
C.
Citizens vote on all actions, and the government follows majority decisions.
D.
Citizens don't have the power to vote because the government is already established.
Answer:
Statement B. best describes a representative government.
The statement best illustrates about the representative democracy is Citizens elect officials who express voters' interests in the government. Thus, option B is correct.
What is representative democracy?In contrast to direct democracy, representative democracy, also known as indirect democracy, is a style of democracy in which elected officials represent a group of people.
A representative democracy is preferred in governments with a moderate to large population because it balances efficiency with power-sharing.
It is also known as representational governance or indirect democracy. Representative democracy is vital because it allows people to get to know their representatives before voting for them. Therefore, it can be concluded that option B is correct.
Learn more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ2
how did the framers bypass congress and state legislatures in the process of ratifying the new constitution?
They avoided state legislators because they thought they would be reluctant to hand over power to the federal government. They asked that each state conduct a separate ratification convention in its place.
What was the conflict around ratification?In order to establish a powerful central government to deal with the challenges the nation faced, the Federalists sought to convert at least three states. The Anti-Federalists fought passionately against the Constitution because it lacked a charter of rights and constituted a powerful central government that reminded them of the one they had just toppled.
The ratification process was quite tense. The "vote now, amend later" deal helped achieve victory in Massachusetts, where the tide finally flipped, as well as in the remaining holdout states.
To learn more about ratification visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17922816
#SPJ4
Early claims of inherent racial superiority or inferiority existed largely to justify
a) inheritance laws.
b) euthanasia.
c) slavery.
d) marriage laws.
Early claims of racial superiority or inferiority were used to justify the enslavement of certain groups and the exploitation of their labour. Thus the correct answer is option c) slavery.
Particularly in the context of transatlantic slavery, early arguments of innate racial superiority or inferiority were largely used to justify the enslavement of some populations and the exploitation of their labour. The idea of racial superiority also played a part in colonialism and imperialism, as it was used as an excuse by European countries to oppress and exploit non-European peoples.
In addition, racial hierarchies were utilised as an excuse for discriminatory policies and legislation in fields including employment, housing, and education. The emergence of notions about racial superiority or inferiority may have been impacted by attitudes about race, although inheritance rules and marriage regulations were not the main factors.
Learn more about slavery:
https://brainly.com/question/28808482
#SPJ4
Sanitation rules are established by:
A. the department of revenue
B. the governor
C. the board of cosmo and barbers examiner
D. the board of complaints
Answer:
The answer is probably C because I looked it up on the internet.
how will criminal investigations in the future be more complex and global than in the past.
Criminologists from the consensus perspective maintain all of the following EXCEPT:
a. where differences between groups exist, law is the neutral mechanism that helps individuals resolve their conflicts
b. law reflects the need for social order
c. law is a product of value consensus
d. law is a partial system that protects private interests
Answer & Explanation:
The statement that criminologists from the consensus perspective maintain that "law is a partial system that protects private interests" is not accurate. Criminologists from the consensus perspective generally argue that law is a neutral mechanism that helps individuals resolve conflicts, reflects the need for social order, and is a product of value consensus. They do not typically view law as a partial system that exclusively protects private interests.
Criminologists from the consensus perspective maintain all of the following EXCEPT:
d. law is a partial system that protects private interests.
The consensus perspective emphasizes that laws are created based on a general agreement and shared values in society, focusing on the role of law in maintaining social order. Therefore, options a, b, and c align with this perspective, while option d does not, as it suggests a bias in the legal system favoring private interests.
From the consensus perspective, criminologists maintain that law reflects the need for social order and is a product of value consensus. However, they do not believe that law is a neutral mechanism that helps individuals resolve their conflicts or that it is a partial system that protects private interests. Instead, they argue that law is a universal set of rules and norms that promote social cohesion and regulate individual behavior. In their view, the criminal justice system should aim to prevent crime and rehabilitate offenders, rather than solely punishing them. This approach emphasizes the importance of community involvement and social intervention in addressing the root causes of criminal behavior.
To know more about private interests visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29765850
#SPJ11
the primary purpose of the jury is to prevent oppression by the government T/F
The statement is true because the primary purpose of the jury is to serve as a check against the government's power to oppress citizens.
Juries ensure that the government cannot simply accuse and convict individuals without due process and evidence. The jury's duty is to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused based on the evidence presented in court, and this serves as a safeguard against arbitrary arrests and convictions.
Additionally, the jury system allows for the participation of citizens in the justice system, promoting democratic values and ensuring that the judicial process remains fair and impartial. Overall, the jury system plays a crucial role in preventing government oppression and upholding the rights of individuals.
Learn more about oppression https://brainly.com/question/9114768
#SPJ11
Students who attend school at one of the Military Academies receive:
A . free tuition.
B. a bachelors degree.
C . a commission in the military upon graduation.
D. All of these choices are correct.
Answer:
The answer Is a because they are going to a school that is free but not free 100%
Question #12
You are driving on a two-lane highway. The vehicle directly ahead of you has pulled out to pass the car ahead of them. It looks like they might not have enough room to complete the pass safely. You should
Choose an answer:
A. Take your foot off the gas pedal and wait to see what happens before reacting further. B. Immediately slow down and move closer to the right edge of the road. Look for an open area on your right, in case you must drive off the road to avoid a crash. C. Brake firmly and keep your vehicle in the middle of your lane
Your action in reaction to the car ahead of you trying to pass the car ahead is to B. Immediately slow down and move closer to the right edge of the road. Look for an open area on your right, in case you must drive off the road to avoid a crash.
How to avoid an accident when a vehicle tries to pass ?When driving on a two-lane highway, it is important to maintain a safe following distance and be aware of passing vehicles. If the vehicle directly ahead of you has pulled out to pass another car, you should be cautious and prepared for any sudden maneuvers they may make.
If it looks like they may not have enough room to complete the pass safely, you should immediately slow down and move to the right side of the road to give them more space.
Find out more on vehicles at https://brainly.com/question/30143708
#SPJ1
Why are techniques or rules to interpret the meaning of statutes necessary?
The techniques or the rules that are used to interpret statutes are very necessary given the fact that they help to justify the decisions that are made by the judges that preside over cases.
What is a statute?The term statute has to do with the enactment that is established by the legislative arm of a nation as a legal document that has to do with the ways that the policies of the nation would have to be carried out as well as the laws and the regulations that are necessary in the area.
The use of statutes is very necessary because it is wha tis used to decide cases by the law courts. The judge would have to base jis decisions based on what the law expects him to do at the moment.
It is necessary to know the statutes so that a person would be able to know the true meaning of the terms that are contained in that statutes.
Read more on government statutes here: https://brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ1
Today is February 23, 2022. Which guest could you legally sale/deliver alcohol to?
In the majority of nations, a person must be at least 21 years old before they can purchase alcohol. Working Reversing the date "February 23, 2022," we get Monday, Friday, February 23, 2001 as the age requirement for the person to be served.
This is it: As long as a specific customer is on your property, pay attention to their actions. Severe slurring of speech, bloodshot eyes, an odd or unsteady walk, and noisy conduct are all indications of possible intoxication.
Driving licenses with photos, passports, military IDs, and proof of age cards with the PASS hologram are a few examples of approved identification, while other types of identity that satisfy the requirements outlined above are also accepted.
To learn more about alcohol, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/28337689
#SPJ4
it is believed that for every report of abuse the police and child protective services (cps) receive, how many cases are unreported
a.10
b.9
c.8
d.7
It is believed that for every report of abuse the police and Child Protective Services (CPS) receive, there are b) 9 unreported cases.
It can be stated that various factors contribute to the underreporting of abuse cases. For example, victims may fear retaliation from the abuser, may not recognize that they are being abused, or may not know how to report it. Additionally, some cases may go unreported due to the lack of evidence, insufficient resources, or the reluctance of authorities to investigate.
It is difficult to determine the exact number of unreported abuse cases, but it is important to raise awareness about the issue and provide resources for victims to come forward and seek help. It is also crucial for authorities to take every report seriously and thoroughly investigate all allegations of abuse.
This statistic highlights the prevalence of unreported child abuse cases and the importance of addressing this issue. Many factors contribute to underreporting, such as fear, lack of awareness, and reluctance to involve authorities.
Increasing awareness and improving reporting mechanisms can help protect more children from abuse and ensure they receive the support they need.
To know more about Child Protective Services visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30576168
#SPJ11
Gary works as a police officer . He has just arrived at a crime scene . He has secured it with ropes (cordoned it off) so that people do not enter thescene . What could be Gary's purpose ?
A. to ensure nobody takes photographs
B. to prevent contamination of evidence
C. to prevents media attention
D. to flaunt his authority at the scene
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Gary did that to makes sure no one messes with the evidece.
Hope it helps
What if you worked in the Treasury Department as an anti-terrorist funding expert? What challenges would the Hawala system present to you? How would you track the funds?
Working in the Treasury Department as an anti-terrorist funding expert would involve dealing with various challenges, including those posed by the Hawala system. The Hawala system is an informal money transfer system commonly used in parts of the Middle East, South Asia, and other regions. It operates outside of traditional banking channels and is based on trust and personal relationships.
The challenges the Hawala system presents to an anti-terrorist funding expert are:
1. Lack of transparency: The Hawala system operates on trust and word-of-mouth, making it difficult to trace and monitor financial transactions. There are typically no formal records or paper trails, making it challenging to identify the source and destination of funds.2. Cross-border nature: The Hawala system operates across borders, often involving multiple intermediaries and networks. Tracking funds becomes complex when transactions move through various countries, making it harder to follow the money trail.3. Limited oversight and regulation: The Hawala system is largely unregulated, making it attractive for illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing. The lack of regulatory controls makes it harder to detect suspicious transactions and identify potential funding sources for terrorist organizations.To track funds within the Hawala system, an anti-terrorist funding expert would employ various strategies:
1. Intelligence gathering: Gathering intelligence from multiple sources, including financial institutions, law enforcement agencies, and international partners, to identify patterns, trends, and individuals involved in the Hawala system.2. Collaborative efforts: Cooperating and sharing information with international counterparts to gain insights into global Hawala networks and their links to terrorist financing.3. Monitoring financial transactions: Utilizing advanced monitoring tools and techniques to identify suspicious transactions that may indicate terrorist financing. This may involve data analysis, transaction monitoring software, and risk profiling.4. Investigative techniques: Conducting targeted investigations to gather evidence and build cases against individuals or organizations involved in the Hawala system and terrorist financing.5. Financial intelligence sharing: Collaborating with other government agencies, financial institutions, and international organizations to share financial intelligence and enhance the collective ability to track and disrupt illicit financial flows.It is important to note that effectively tracking funds within the Hawala system requires a combination of financial expertise, intelligence analysis, collaboration, and the utilization of advanced technologies. The challenges are significant, but with a strategic and multi-faceted approach, it is possible to identify and disrupt terrorist funding networks operating through the Hawala system.\(\huge{\mathcal{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{\textsf{I hope this helps !}}}}}\)
♥️ \(\large{\textcolor{red}{\underline{\texttt{SUMIT ROY (:}}}}\)
4. What happens when a person or government attempts to deprive someone of something that is necessary to human dignity?
Depriving someone of their fundamental right, translates to robbery and hence going against the Law. Hence, such person has violated the Law and should be tried.
The Rule of Fundamental human right is a very huge and respected law pertaining to individuals living in a democratic country. This means that, the right of other must not be trampled upon, either by other individuals or the government.Therefore, anyone who goes against these law has trespassed and could be face trial.
Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/24087938
How the Supreme Court has balanced the values of order and freedom in the
area of pure and symbolic speech
Scenario: Cristina has just come into the crime lab, where Detective John Jones and several boxes of evidence are waiting for her. As he leaves the lab, Jones tells her, "These are the boxes for a burglary case we picked up last night. I'm just dropping them off. "
What is the specific chain of custody problem for each item?
There are a few potential chain of custody issues in this scenario:
Lack of documentation: It is not clear from the information provided whether Detective Jones has properly documented the handling and storage of the evidence before bringing it to the crime lab. Without proper documentation, it can be difficult to establish the authenticity and reliability of the evidence.Contamination or alteration: Without proper handling and storage, the evidence may be subject to contamination or alteration. For example, if the boxes were not properly sealed or protected, the evidence could be exposed to physical or chemical agents.Loss or destruction: If the evidence is not properly secured and protected, it is possible that it could be lost or destroyed. This could be due to accidental loss, theft, or intentional destruction.Inaccurate or incomplete record-keeping: If Detective Jones has not accurately recorded the details of the case, such as the location of the burglary and the time it occurred, it could be difficult to establish the authenticity and reliability of the evidence.Overall, it is important that Detective Jones take steps to properly document and handle the evidence, in order to maintain the integrity of the chain of custody.
This includes properly sealing and labeling the boxes of evidence, accurately recording the details of the case, and properly storing and securing the evidence until it can be analyzed in the crime lab.
Learn more about chain of custody:
https://brainly.com/question/19317844
#SPJ4
How does this map reflect the legacy of Plessy v. Ferguson?
Cathy was incarcerated because she has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren. She has been held in custody for an extended period after her incarceration term ended because she has the possibility of becoming violent, which is also known as:
Answer:
Preventative detention
Explanation:
Preventative detention is a form of incarceration that is given when the detained party is thought of as harmful to the society.
They are detained to prevent further acts of violence or crime in the community.in which they live.
In the given scenario Cathy has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren.
Releasing her will most likely lead to further abuse on the step children.
This was done to prevent further acts of violence from her.
T/F. A single act can be both a tort and a crime.
The given statement "A single act can be both a tort and a crime" is true because both of them are resulting breach of particular persons' rights.
A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or injury to another individual, while a crime is a violation of a law that is punishable by the state or government. An action can be considered both if it results in harm or injury to another person and also violates a law. In such cases, the victim can seek compensation through a civil lawsuit, and the state can pursue criminal charges against the offender.
Therefore, an act can be both a tort (resulting in a lawsuit and civil damages) and a crime (resulting in criminal charges and penalties). Examples include assault, battery, and fraud.
So, it is true that a single act can be both a tort and a crime.
To learn more about Tort and Crime visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15403575
#SPJ11
discuss the importance of every parts of police operational planning?
Species A - took 23 hours for the egg to reach first instar and the eggs were collected from the scene and kept at a constant temperature of 78 degrees Fahrenheit. What was the ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar?
The ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar is 756.
What is ADH?
Accumulated degree hour (ADH) is the given amount of thermal energy which an egg-based animal or insect requires to develop from one stage to the next of its life, especially during the incubation period.
The formula for calculating ADH is given as:
ADH = Time (hrs.) X (Average temp. – Minimum development threshold temperature).
Data and Calculations:Number of hours for the egg to reach the first instar = 23 hours
Storage temperature of the eggs = 78 degrees Fahrenheit
Number of hours at the second instar = 28 hours
Assumed minimum development temperature threshold for eggs = 51 degrees Fahrenheit
ADH = Time (hrs.) X (Average temp. – Minimum development threshold temperature)
= 756 {28 x (78 - 51)}
Thus, the ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar is 756. Though, ordinarily, an egg requires 1,890 ADH (70 x 27) to grow from the first instar to the 2nd instar.
Learn more about instar development at https://brainly.com/question/11659006
Dwi penalties in New Mexico for Interlock
Describe the negative impact of failing to acknowledge unity diversity
Answer:
Explanation:
Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:
Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.
Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.
Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.
Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.
Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.
Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.
Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Answer:
This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.
Explain the roles that the senses play in the works of Descartes and Hume and discuss how their views lead to their contrasting epistemological positions.
Answer:
Descartes argues that the senses are a thing of the body, not of the mind. The mind tells you it is wax while the body tells you it is cold, hard, scented, and so forth. Descartes argues that this is because the senses do not belong to the object.
The epistemological positions held by Descartes and Hume are contrasting as Descartes utilizes skepticism or doubt to find truth and knowledge present in the various sciences whereas, Hume uses skepticism and doubt to explain how knowledge is obtained or acquired.
Please give me brainliest - you get 25% as well! I swear!
Define the Office of Civil Rights, and its responsibility as it relates to HIPAA.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for administering and enforcing these standards, in concert with its enforcement of the Privacy Rule, and may conduct complaint investigations and compliance reviews.
Which doctrine applies in construction contracts and means that the constructed building is, for practical purposes, just as good as the one contracted for?
a. substantial evidence
b. vicarious liability
c. due process
d. substantial performance
Doctrine applies in construction contracts and means that the constructed building is, for practical purposes, just as good as the one contracted for Substantial performance Therefore the correct option is D.
Substantial performance is a doctrine that applies in construction contracts, and it means that the constructed building is, for practical purposes, just as good as the one contracted for. This doctrine focuses on the idea of whether or not, even if there are minor mistakes or issues with the building's quality,
it still provides substantial performance to meet the standard of what was contracted for. The concept here is that if the overall quality of a building is close enough to meet the contract specifications and acceptable construction code requirements then any minor deficiencies can be overlooked.
Hence the correct option is D
To know more about Substantial performance visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29434580
#SPJ4
what is the role of the competition appeal court
Answer: Competition
Explanation: Competition Appeal Tribunal a specialist judicial body. Among other things, it is charged with hearing appeals in respect of decisions made under the Competition Act 1998 by the OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING and the regulators in the telecommunications, electricity, gas, water, railways and air traffic services sectors.
Hope this helps!
Chen was here
Answer: The Competition Appeal Court may consider any appeal from, or review of, a decision of the Competition Tribunal; confirm, amend or set aside a decision or an order that is the subject of appeal or review by the Competition Tribunal; and give any judgment or make any order that the circumstances require.
Explanation:
Ways in which the rule of laws protects community members whose property was damaged due to protests
Answer: Four ways you might want to look into
Explanation:
Criminal prosecution: The rule of law requires that those who commit criminal acts, such as damaging private property, be held accountable for their actions. Community members could report the damage to the authorities, who could then investigate the incident and pursue criminal charges against those responsible.
Civil litigation: The rule of law also provides for civil remedies, such as suing the individuals or groups responsible for the damage. Community members could file a lawsuit seeking compensation for the damage caused to their property.
Police protection: The rule of law requires that law enforcement agencies protect citizens and their property. Community members could request police protection to prevent further damage to their property during future protests.
Injunctions: The rule of law provides for injunctions to prevent individuals or groups from engaging in certain activities, such as damaging private property. Community members could seek an injunction to prevent future damage to their property during protests