Answer: There is an implied condition in any contract that the product or service must suit the purpose of the product or service. In other words, the time and place must meet the needs of the buyer, though of course, it should also be considered reasonable.
Mostly it comes down to negotiation between the parties, and is unlikely to go to court, unless there is some sort of dispute.
Explanation:
What is true about the inertia of two cars, Car A of mass 1,500 kilograms and Car B of mass 2,000 kilograms?
OA.
Car A and Car Bhave the same inertia.
B.
Car A has more inertia than Car B.
Oc.
Car Bhas more inertia than Car A.
ОО
D.
Both the cars have negligible inertia.
Answer:
Car B has more inertia than Car A.
Explanation:
Inertia of a body is the property to oppose its state of rest or state of uniform motion. It is also equivalent to the measure of its mass. Newton's first law of motion is also called as law of inertia.
According to your question, we have to mention the name of car that has more inertia. So, the body having more mass will have more inertia.
The mass of car A is 1500 kg while the mass of car b is 2000 kg. Hence, car B will have more inertia.
Tell the story of Trump Old Post Office v. Topo Atrio. Who had a
duty to mitigate in that case? What actions should that party take
in order to satisfy its duty to mitigate?
Donald Trump promised to make a move against gourmet expert Jos Andrs for leaving their eatery bargain at the Old Post Office after the Republican official up-and-comer offered generally reprimanded remarks on migrants.
On Friday, the Donald followed through on his promise. Trump Old Post Office LLC sued Andrs Think Food Group and an offshoot, Topo Atrio LLC, for $10 million and lawyers expenses, blaming them for two counts of break of agreement. The suit was documented in U.S. Region court for the District of Columbia
Andrs pulled out of the D.C. lodging bargain after Trump offered stigmatizing remarks about Mexican settlers during a June 15 discourse proclaiming his application for the Republican selection for president. The Spanish-conceived cook said recently that after those remarks, opening an eatery in Trumps inn was unthinkable, given his pleased worker legacy and that of a considerable lot of his representatives and visitors.
Work is in progress on the $200 million, 263-room Trump International Hotel, which was additionally expected to house a café from New York culinary expert Geoffrey Zakarian, however Zakarian likewise said recently he would pull out of the project. Think Food Group had a 10-year rent with Trump to work a lead eatery in the inn. However, as indicated by Trump's suit, Think Food Group told Trump's organization that his remarks abused the agreements of calm satisfaction and great confidence and reasonable managing.
The suit calls Andrs' response to Trump's comments "inquisitive," bringing up that the gourmet specialist said he respected Trump when the two declared the association in November.
"Mr. Andrs offense is interested considering the way that Mr. Trumps freely shared perspectives on movement have stayed reliable for a long time, and Mr. Trumps ability to honestly impart his insights is broadly known," the suit expressed.
The café bunch mentioned July 17 that Trump abjure his assertions and shun publicizing comparative articulations once more, as per the suit. That very day, Trump Old Post Office LLC had likewise informed Think Food Group that it was in default of its rent since it had not conveyed development records by June 29, as was spread out in the rent.
Trumps claim noticed that it is unquestionably hurtful to open a lavish inn without its arranged eatery, substantially less one going through development as will presently be required.
To know more about Donald Trump
brainly.com/question/30762825
#SPJ11
Do you think issues like: Marriage rights and Abortion ought to be decided by: (1)Supreme Court (and therefore apply to ALL Americans the same), (2) have State Legislators vote and decide, or (3) have the voters in each state decide these issues? (There are three options here. Pick one and defend it against the other two.)
Please help
(Each question is worth 40 points)
1. Identify three goals of the legal system. Do you feel we live up to these goals? Why
or why not. Provide specific examples.
Answer:
1) Protecting basic human rights –Promoting fairness –Helping resolve conflicts –Promoting order and stability.
2) mm with today's society no I dont. I feel like we try to but we don't end up fulfilling the "goal"
Like we try to respect others human rights but we can't do that with people being against ones wishes you know. And some people just want violence so we can't really promote order and stability.
a world health organization document that attempts to restrict advertising of cigarettes is ignored by tobacco companies in the united states. this is an example of which of the following principles of u.s. health law? group of answer choices a provision of international law does not apply in the united states unless united states law incorporates the provision such as ratification of a treaty by the united states congress. the interstate commerce clause of the united states constitution has been used as a basis for justifying federal action in the area of health. police powers allow states to pass legislation and take actions to protect the common good.
A) A provision of International law does not apply in the United States unless United States law incorporates the provision such as ratification of a treaty by the United States Congress.
Historically, the prevention and control of communicable diseases had been done by way of sanitation, safe water, meal supply, isolation, and immunization.
EBPH is the improvement, implementation, and assessment of powerful packages and guidelines in public fitness via the application of standards of clinical reasoning, such as systematic makes use of statistics and information structures and appropriate use of software making plans fashions.
Learn more about ratification here https://brainly.com/question/7458577
#SPJ4
The defendant, Union Pacific RR (UPRR), was sued, under the authority of the Federal Employees Labor Act (FELA), by one of its own employees who was afflicted by West Nile virus after being bitten by a mosquito while on the job. After coming down with the virus, William Nami, the plaintiff, could not walk without a cane, could not drive, and had experienced memory loss. He argued that he was bitten by an infected mosquito while working for UPRR outside Galveston, Texas, and next to an area on UPRR’s right of way, that was infested by the virus-carrying mosquitoes. He noted that the infestation had been exacerbated by UPRR’s negligence in never mowing the grass and allowing the standing water to accumulate. Nami also argued that UPRR did not warn employees about the mosquitoes, did not provide insect repellent, and did not equip employees with long-sleeved shirts. UPRR replied that under the doctrine of ferae naturae, the company was not liable for Nami’s illness because he was injured by a wild animal that was not in UPRR’s possession. UPRR also claimed that because the danger was commonly understood to exist (Galveston is known by local inhabitants as the "mosquito capital of the world"), the company had neither a duty to warn nor a duty to supply employees with repellent or long-sleeved shirts. UPRR also disputed the claim that it did not mow the grass and that it let the standing water accumulate. Nami argued that UPRR was relying on common law principles, like ferae naturae and proximate cause, that had been deliberately superseded by FELA, which states that a railroad will be liable for on-the-job injuries to a worker if the railroad "caused or contributed to" a worker’s injury just so long as the railroad’s "negligence played a part—no matter how small—in bringing about the injury." The trial court held for the railroad, but the court of appeals reversed. The case then went to the Texas Supreme Court. Does FELA supersede the Roman law principle of ferae naturae, and if not, does the doctrine of ferae naturae protect UPRR from liability? Explain. [See: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Nami, 498 S.W. 3d 890 (Texas 2016).]
We found that the idea still holds true in the contemporary environment and that the catastrophe was not the fault of the Railways.
A railway worker who was bitten by a mosquito and later found to have West Nile virus is suing his employer for damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (often known as "FELA," which mandates railway companies to provide their workers with a sufficiently safe place of working).
The majority of the time, FELA culpability is determined in accordance with the norms of common law negligence. The well-established "ferret hypothesis" of the nature doctrine releases landowners from responsibility for damage caused by wild animals that wander into their property without human action.
Learn more about Liability Act here
https://brainly.com/question/31190764
#SPJ4
1. You may drive off of the paved roadway to pass another vehicle
Answer: The answer is false.
Explanation: To pass another vehicle, you must never drive off the paved or main-traveled area of the road and onto the shoulder.
We cannot drive off of the paved roadway to pass another vehicle. To pass another vehicle, we must never drive off the paved or main-traveled area of the road and onto the shoulder.
The given statement is false.
What is a paved roadway?Paved road is defined as an improved street, highway, alley, public way, or easement that is covered by concrete or asphaltic concrete, excluding access roadways that connect a facility to a public paved roadway but are not open to through traffic.
On a two-way street, keep left to allow traffic from the opposite direction to pass on your right, and keep right on a one-way street to allow vehicles behind you to overtake from the right.
When we turn left, stay to the left side of the road you're leaving as well as the one you're entering. When turning right, move to the center of the exiting road and then to the left side of the entering road.
Therefore, drive off of the paved roadway to pass another vehicle is not possible any under any circumstances.
To learn more on paved roadway, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15488796
#SPJ2
A motion to determine competency (mental state of mind of the defendant at time of trial as opposed to insanity would be mental state at the time the cri me was committed) is decided by the judge who determines if the defendant 1) is able to understand the nature and purpose of the proceedings and 2) has the ability to assist his counsel in his defense.
pretrial publicity tends to produce a bias against defendants because
Pretrial publicity refers to the media coverage that a criminal case receives before the trial begins. The media has a significant influence on public opinion and perception of the accused, and the way the case is reported can significantly affect the defendant's chances of receiving a fair trial.
Unfortunately, pretrial publicity tends to produce a bias against defendants because the media often presents the prosecution's side of the case more favorably, sensationalizes the crime, and portrays the defendant as guilty before the trial begins.
Studies have shown that pretrial publicity can create a "trial by media" atmosphere that undermines the defendant's presumption of innocence, undermines the fairness of the trial, and ultimately results in a biased jury pool. The media's focus on crime and the sensational aspects of a case can heighten the public's emotions and lead them to demand a conviction. This, in turn, puts pressure on the prosecutor to obtain a guilty verdict, even if the evidence is insufficient.
Furthermore, pretrial publicity can impact the defendant's ability to receive a fair and impartial trial by influencing potential jurors' views on the case. The media coverage can create a preconceived notion about the defendant's guilt or innocence, which can affect the juror's ability to be unbiased. Therefore, in high-profile cases, it is essential to take precautions to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial despite the pretrial publicity's bias against them.
To know more about fair trial
https://brainly.com/question/15196489
#SPJ11
what are the similarities between the law in the old testament and the law in the new testament?
Answer:
The relationship between the Old Covenant and the New can be presented as follows: God has only one covenant of grace, and only one eternal people - in which a person obtains a share through faith in Christ alone, the Covenant Head and the Adam of the new humanity.
Explanation:
Alison and Brent are financing their house purchase of $232,500 with an FHA loan. Their credit score qualifies them for the minimum down payment. What do they need to put down?
Alison and Brent are financing their house purchase of $232,500 with an FHA loan. Their credit score qualifies them for the minimum down payment, they would have to pay in $8,137.50.
What is meant by minimum down payment?The financial contribution that a borrower is required to make when they buy a property is known as the minimum down payment. The minimum down payment needed for a conventional loan is typically 20%, and the minimum down payment needed for an FHA loan is 3.5%.
However, many mortgage loans will require such a minimum, and the actual amount necessary varies by the lending type.
The calculation is $232,500 * 3.5%
= $232,500 * 0.035
= $8,137.50.
Read more on loan here:https://brainly.com/question/26913200
#SPJ1
if leaguesharp allowed its users to see lol players' information, what laws would it be violating?
Explain the difference between secured and unsecured creditors.
a) Secured creditors have collateral to secure their debt, while unsecured creditors do not.
b) Secured creditors have higher priority in repayment than unsecured creditors.
c) Unsecured creditors have a higher interest rate compared to secured creditors.
d) Secured creditors are individuals, while unsecured creditors are institutions.
The correct option is: a) Secured creditors have collateral to secure their debt, while unsecured creditors do not.The primary difference between secured and unsecured creditors lies in the presence or absence of collateral to secure the debt. Here's a breakdown of the options you provided:
a) Secured creditors have collateral to secure their debt, while unsecured creditors do not. Secured creditors hold a legal claim on specific assets or property that serves as collateral for the debt owed to them. If the borrower defaults on the loan or debt, the secured creditor has the right to seize and sell the collateral to recover the outstanding amount. b) Secured creditors have higher priority in repayment than unsecured creditors. This statement is generally true. In the event of bankruptcy or liquidation, secured creditors have a higher priority in receiving repayment compared to unsecured creditors. This is because their claims are backed by collateral, providing a higher level of security for their loan.
c) Unsecured creditors have a higher interest rate compared to secured creditors. The interest rate charged by creditors is not directly related to whether they are secured or unsecured. Interest rates are typically determined by various factors, including the creditworthiness of the borrower, prevailing market rates, and the terms of the loan or credit agreement. d) Secured creditors are individuals, while unsecured creditors are institutions. This statement is not accurate. Both secured and unsecured creditors can be individuals or institutions. The distinction between secured and unsecured creditors is based on the presence or absence of collateral, not the type of entity they represent.
To know more about Secured creditors visit-
brainly.com/question/32337426
#SPJ11
What is a joint committee? A. A congressional committee made up of members of both houses of Congress OB. A special committee created when the House and the Senate fail to support a bill C. A temporary congressional committee formed to deal with an issue not covered by a standing committee D. A permanent congressional committee that focuses on issues specific to each house of Congress
In determining whether a witness is credible, an investigator should (check all that apply):
A. observe the witness's demeanor while speaking
B. refrain from reaching conclusions about a witness's veracity
C. consider the witness's bias and motive to testify
D. consider whether the individual has the ability to make an effective witness
Which sentence from the article supports the MAIN idea of the article? On Law Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies at 87 in Newsela. A. Ginsburg was a women's rights champion and the court's second female justice. B.During Barack Obama's presidency in 2014, many liberals called for Ginsburg to retire. C. She said it was "like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet." D. She married Martin Ginsburg in 1954, the year she graduated from Cornell University. Select a answer
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I would want to believe A, Ginsburg was a women's rights champion and the court's second female justice., is the answer because it explains more about the person in question, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that is.
While the other options were more about what she said or did, A in particular is talking about who Ruth is, and even went as much as listing an accolade of hers, that she's the court's second female justice.
So, I go with A
A partnership agreement identifies the investment contributed by each partner and the duration of the partnership T or F
True. A partnership agreement typically outlines the investment contributed by each partner, which can include capital, assets, or services, and specifies the duration or term of the partnership.
Investment Contributions: The partnership agreement specifies the investment or capital contributions made by each partner.
This can include financial investments, assets, intellectual property, or even services. Clearly defining each partner's contribution helps establish their respective ownership interests and the value they bring to the partnership.
For example, Partner A may contribute $100,000 in cash, while Partner B may contribute office space valued at $50,000 and Partner C may contribute their expertise or services valued at $30,000. These contributions form the basis for each partner's ownership stake and potential distribution of profits or losses.
Duration or Term of Partnership: The agreement also specifies the duration or term of the partnership. It outlines whether the partnership is formed for a specific period of time or if it continues indefinitely until certain conditions are met or if one or more partners decide to dissolve the partnership.
The duration of the partnership can vary depending on the nature of the business and the goals of the partners involved. Some partnerships may be established for a fixed period, such as five years, while others may be open-ended. It is important to clearly define the term to avoid any ambiguity or misunderstanding among the partners.
Additionally, the agreement may outline provisions for renewing or extending the partnership term, termination procedures, and the process for handling the dissolution of the partnership if necessary.
By including these provisions in the partnership agreement, the partners can ensure transparency, avoid conflicts, and establish a clear framework for their business venture. It provides a solid foundation for the partnership's operations, decision-making processes, profit sharing, and any potential dispute resolution.
Learn more about assets here: brainly.com/question/14826727
#SPJ11
Which statement best explains how political parties are able to exert
influence over U.S. public policy?
A. Parties offer campaign funds to candidates who will support the
party's platform once in office.
B. Party members work to limit the influence of political action
committees on public policy decisions.
C. Party leaders bring together voters with opposing values to enable
policy compromises.
D. Parties ensure that their members are unable to vote
independently on most public policy issues.
If an officer is directing traffic at a working traffic light, drivers should:
Answer:
Follow the officers directions only. An officers direction of traffic overrides any other traffic management or postage.
Explanation:
Two police cars are chasing a suspected
bank robber. If one police car cuts through
the park, it can get in front of the suspect's
car and trap it between the patrol cars. Determine if this is allowed or no allowed based on “Vehicles prohibited in parks” law, explain why.
Answer:
Explanation:
Because i we drive our car in the park it will hit someone
offering to another person as genuine a document known to be a fake
The term that means "offering to another person as genuine a document known to be a fake" is a forgery.
Forgery is the act of producing, adapting, or imitating objects, statistics, or documents with the intention to deceive. Forgery typically entails the creation of a fabricated written document or another item with the intention to deceive an individual or company. This may include the creation of counterfeit currency or personal documents, such as passports and driver's licenses.
Forgery may also include the signing of a document by someone who does not have the authority to do so. It's important to note that forgery is a crime, and those found guilty of forgery may face legal consequences such as imprisonment or fines.
Hence, the term that means "offering to another person as genuine a document known to be a fake" is a forgery.
Read more about Forgery at https://brainly.com/question/13582375
#SPJ11
unless a person is licensed to act as a residential mortgage lender, broker, or originator under the act, he or she is prohibited from using which word or phrase in advertisements?
The terms "mortgage lender" or "mortgage broker" may not be used in advertisements unless the user is authorized to act as a residential mortgage lender, broker or originator under the act.
It is illegal to use the terms "mortgage lender," "mortgage broker," or "mortgage originator" in advertisements unless the person is duly authorized to act as a residential mortgage lender, broker or originator under the applicable act. By requiring that only licensed professionals advertise and provide mortgage related services, this restriction aims to protect consumers.
The regulatory framework contributes to the prevention of misleading or deceptive advertising and encourages transparency in the mortgage industry by forbidding unlicensed individuals from using these terms. The purpose of licensing requirements is to protect the interests of consumers and preserve the integrity of the industry by ensuring that those offering mortgage services adhere to a set of standards and qualifications.
Learn more about mortgage lender at:
brainly.com/question/32196507
#SPJ4
which of the following is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.
Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.
Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.
The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?
cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money
Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income
Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"
Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:
brainly.com/question/31749142
#SPJ4
which type of prisoners picture themselves as political prisoners
The type of prisoners who picture themselves as political prisoners are those who believe that they have been incarcerated due to their political beliefs or activities.
They view themselves as individuals who have been unjustly targeted or imprisoned by the government or authorities for their political activism or opposition to the established regime.
Political prisoners often see their imprisonment as a form of repression or persecution rather than a result of criminal behavior. They may consider themselves advocates for social or political change and believe that their imprisonment is a means to silence their dissenting voices.
It's important to note that the designation of oneself as a political prisoner can be subjective and contested. The classification of a prisoner as a political prisoner may vary depending on the perspective of different individuals, organizations, or governments.
To know more about political beliefs , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2519142
#SPJ11
Johnny was a child that went into foster care at birth and lived with three different foster families by the end of his first year of life. Johnny was very fortunate that each of the three foster homes he was placed in had warm and attentive caregivers. Johnny was placed with his 4th foster family at age 1.5 and was then adopted by that family . Given what we know about the factors that affect attachment security, which statement about Johnny's attachment style is most likely to be true ? a. Johnny will develop a secure attachment to his adoptive parents by age 2, given they provide warm and attentive caregiving. b Johnny may have a harder time forming secure attachments to his adoptive parents , but may over time given they provide warm and attentive caregiving . Oc Johnny will not form secure attachments to his adoptive parents regardless of their parenting practices . d. Johnny will form secure attachments with each of the foster families and his adoptive parents given they all provided warm and attentive caregiving .
Answer:
B or D
Explanation:
Which of the following occur(s) when a party threatens to file a frivolous civil lawsuit unless another party gives consent to the terms of a contract?
A) Duress
B) Undue influence
C) Durable fraud
D) Criminal influence
E) Duress and undue influence, but not durable fraud
When one party was coerced into making a commitment by another party's wrongdoing, duress has occurred. Duress could occur when one party threatens to bring a pointless legal case or civil lawsuit if the other doesn't agree to the contract's terms.so option a is correct.
Which civil lawsuit style is the most typical?Tort claims, contract violations, and landlord/tenant disputes are the three types of civil cases that occur most frequently. The general steps in a civil case are submitting a complaint, gathering evidence, having a trial, and appealing the verdict. example When a person is hurt in a car accident, they file a lawsuit against the other driver; When a worker hurts his back at work and is unable to work again, the worker sues his employer; A homeowner who hired a builder to construct a new kitchen sues the builder when the kitchen needs to be fixed because it was poorly built;
To know more about civil lawsuit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12190021
#SPJ1
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Graydon and Emma enter into a contract that requires Graydon personally to paint a mural for Emma on her garage door. Graydon assigns his rights and delegates performance of his duties to Roy. Emma refuses to permit Roy to do the work, employs another painter (at a higher price), and brings an action against Graydon, claiming as damages the difference between the contract price and the cost to employ the other painter.
1. Will Emma prevail? Does Graydon have the right to delegate his duty to paint the mural to another person (Roy)?
After looking at the contract we can say, Emma will not prevail, and Graydon has the right to delegate his duty to paint the mural to another person (Roy).
What is a contract?A contract is an agreement or a promise between two or more parties to do something, not to do something, or to exchange something of value. Contracts can be written, oral, or implied, and they can be formal or informal. In this case, Graydon and Emma entered into a contract, and Graydon delegated his duty to Roy.
When a duty is assigned, the assignor is still responsible for performance, so Graydon remains responsible for the work to be done by Roy. Emma has no legitimate claim against Graydon because the delegation was permissible, and it was her responsibility to permit Roy to perform the work.
Emma hired another painter at a higher price and then claimed damages from Graydon, which is not appropriate. Emma cannot seek damages because Graydon fulfilled his obligation by delegating his duties to Roy, and Emma refused to accept Roy's work.
To know more about contract, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32254040#
#SPJ11
- A court that does not typically hear original trials, but
whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is
likely to be a(n):
a)Trial Court
b)Civil Court
c) Intermediate Appellate Cour
C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court
An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.
To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here
https://brainly.com/question/33718034
#SPJ11
If criminal behavior is learned, who taught the first criminal?