Answers
Answer:
the hardest thing to deal with is people that are with you will sometimes get your head messed up so make sure your partner is someone who can help you
Related Questions
Looking at misty rain and fog, explain at least two defensive driving techniques you would utilize to adjust your driving and lower your risk
Answers
Answer:
Turn on Fog lights and slow your speed
Explanation:
it helps to see, and harder to crash if you are going slower
when an attorney represents a party in a divorce mediation process, he/she is __________ representing either party in future family-related cases.
a. prevented from
b. required to be
c. commited to
d. better at
Answers
When an attorney represents a party in a divorce mediation process, he/she is prevented from representing either party in future family-related cases.
Divorce attorneys are prevented from representing either party in future family-related cases due to potential conflicts of interest. The lawyer, after representing one party, is no longer in a position to represent the other party impartially. This is to prevent any bias or conflict of interest that may affect the case's outcome negatively.A conflict of interest is a scenario where an attorney may not represent both parties in the same legal matter or similar legal matters, regardless of the type of case.
For instance, a lawyer representing a client in a divorce case cannot represent either of the former partners in a child custody case or any other family law case where there is a potential conflict of interest.In summary, if an attorney represents a party in a divorce mediation process, they are prevented from representing either party in future family-related cases.
To know more about mediation click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30783013
#SPJ11
Which country has the highest proportion of women serving in its national legislatures?
a. Sweden
b. US
c. Japan
d. Germany
e. Canada
Answers
the country with the highest proportion of women serving in its national legislature is Sweden. So, option A is accurate.
A national legislature, also known as a national parliament or a national assembly, is the highest representative body or legislative branch of a country's government. It is responsible for making and passing laws, representing the interests of the people, and providing oversight of the government's activities. The composition and structure of national legislatures can vary from country to country, but they generally consist of elected representatives who represent different regions or constituencies within the country.
Sweden has been a leader in gender equality and women's representation in politics, consistently ranking among the top countries in terms of women's participation in the national parliament. It is worth noting that the representation of women in legislatures can change over time, so it's always recommended to refer to the latest data for the most accurate information.
To know more about national legislature
brainly.com/question/29795145
#SPJ11
How do the attitudes of Brian and the Pena family toward the new law differ?
Answers
Brian thinks that the government’s new law is a good idea while the Pena family is wary of the new law.
How to illustrate the information?From the information, Brian thinks that the government’s new law is a good idea because it will reduce the pollution that has had a negative impact on his family. On the other hand, the Pena family is wary of the new law. It will be expensive for them to comply with it.
They worry that they will have to lower their other costs to meet the cost of compliance. They will either have to donate less to charities or lay off some of their employees.
Learn more about law on:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Complete question:
Brian and his family have lived next to a factory for more than 15 years. Brian works at the factory. Although he finds it convenient that his workplace is within walking distance, he’s worried about the negative effect of the pollution caused by the factory on his family. His children have developed asthma, and he and his wife consistently get respiratory illnesses every year. Last night, he saw on the news that the government has just passed a law that limits the amount of pollution every factory in his state can emit. Brian is hopeful now that his family’s health will begin to improve.
Situation 2
The Peña family has owned the local factory for generations. The Penas believe they are good corporate neighbors. They employ many people from the neighborhood, pay their taxes in full and on time, and donate to many charities. When they hear that the government has passed a law that requires companies to limit the amount of pollution they emit, the Penas get a little tense. They realize that it will cost them a huge amount of money to bring their factory into compliance. This expense will make the factory less profitable for them. To offset that loss of profit, they may have to donate less to the charities. They also worry they will not be able to employ as many people.
How do the attitudes of Brian and the Pena family toward the new law differ?
Eric is a Missouri resident and a sentenced offender. He was sentenced to three years of probation with the following conditions:
1. He must not violate any law of any state or any local ordinance.
2. He must report to Probation Officer Greg James monthly at a predetermined time.
3. He must not use any illegal substance or alcohol and must also submit to random testing.
4. He must obtain permission from Probation Officer James before traveling out of Missouri.
In his second year of probation, Eric was captured by store detectives stealing a satellite radio system from an electronics store in Orlando, Florida. The Orlando Police Department responded to the scene and investigated. After interviewing the store detectives, they issued Eric a misdemeanor appearance citation for shoplifting. The appearance citation contained a mandatory court date for the following month.
Approximately three months later, Probation Officer James received a letter from the local district court in Orlando, Florida. The letter informed James that probationer Eric was in Orlando in January, received a misdemeanor violation for shoplifting, and has since failed to report for the scheduled court date; a warrant has now been issued by the Orlando District Court. James reviewed probationer Eric’s file and found no record of any request to leave the state for any type of travel. Eric’s home address is listed as Springfield, Missouri.
Probation Officer James prepared all of the paperwork required to initiate probation revocation proceedings against Eric. James also sent Eric written notice that the terms of his probation had been breached and that his probation had been placed in jeopardy. The notice informed Eric that a hearing had been set for the probation revocation. During the hearing, Eric will have an opportunity to present evidence on his own behalf.
On the date of the hearing, Eric and James arrived at the courthouse to present their arguments before the presiding judge. During the hearing, Probation Officer James presented evidence supporting the alleged breach of the conditions of probation. He presented sworn statements from Orlando store detectives regarding the shoplifting incident and sworn statements from the Orlando police officer who issued Eric the misdemeanor appearance citation. Eric responded to the allegations by testifying that the Orlando misdemeanor case was a case of mistaken identity and that he was at home in Missouri during that time. James rebutted Eric’s testimony by restating that his witnesses (through their sworn statements) could attest to the fact that Eric was in fact arrested in Orlando for shoplifting the satellite radio system on the date in question. At the close of all testimony, the judge sent the courtroom into a fifteen-minute recess so that he could review all of the testimony and reread the sworn statements from the absent witnesses.
Approximately fifteen minutes later, the judge returned to the bench and announced his decision that Eric had violated the conditions of his probation agreement and should now be sent back to prison to serve out the remainder of the original sentence. The judge added that Eric will face the shoplifting charges upon release from prison. The court then served Eric with a written order stating all of the reasons for the probation revocation.
Can Probation Eric be prosecuted for shoplifting after release from prison, or would that constitute double jeopardy?
Answers
Answer:
Yes, he can be prosecuted.
Explanation:
It would not be considered Double jeopardy, since what he was being prosecuted for was something completely different. It was for shoplifting. Also, he violated the conditions for his probation, he violated the law of the state when he shoplifted.
THE MONKEY'S PAW
ESCAPE ROOM code
Answers
Answer:
The the hek does that mean?
Distinguish the rights and remedies of consumers under the implied terms and conditions in the Sale of Goods Act NSW 1923 with the rights and remedies of consumers under the Consumer Guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
Answers
The Sale of Goods Act NSW 1923 and the Consumer Guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) have many provisions that protect the consumer's rights and remedies. Distinguishing between them is important to understand how to pursue legal action in a situation that involves an implied term.
Let's discuss them:
Sale of Goods Act NSW 1923: Implied Terms and Conditions: Goods sold by description: When goods are sold according to a particular description, they must meet that description. This means that if the product is sold as a type of fruit, it must be that type of fruit and not another. If the product fails to meet the description, the consumer has the right to reject it as long as the goods have not been accepted.
When the product is sold by sample, the goods should match the sample provided. If they do not, the consumer has the right to reject the goods.
Reasonable Quality: Goods should be of reasonable quality. This means that they should be free from defects and be fit for the purpose they were sold. If the goods fail to meet this requirement, the consumer can ask for a refund or replacement within a reasonable time frame.
If the goods are sold as second-hand, they should still be fit for their purpose and in a reasonable condition, considering their age and price.
Consumer Guarantees under the ACL: The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) guarantees consumers certain rights when purchasing goods and services. The guarantees apply regardless of any manufacturer's warranties that come with the product. They include A guarantee of acceptable quality.
A guarantee that the goods are fit for a particular purpose.A guarantee that the goods match their description.A guarantee that the goods comply with any expressed representations or promises.A guarantee of title.
Consumer Guarantees allow consumers to take legal action if they are not satisfied with the goods or services purchased, even if they have accepted them. This means that the consumer can seek a refund, replacement, or repair of the goods or services if they fail to meet any of the guarantees or are faulty. Consumer Guarantees can be enforced by the ACCC, State and Territory fair trading agencies, and consumers themselves. Thus, the consumer can be confident of their protection rights and remedies under the Sale of Goods Act NSW 1923 and the Consumer Guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
Learn more about the Sale of Goods Act:
https://brainly.com/question/32802793
#SPJ11
According to the article, "the act of remembering is akin to
putting puzzle pieces together. How is memory like a puzzle?
Answers
The act of remembering is like putting puzzle pieces together, the article claims. Why is memory similar to a puzzle? Because our minds try to rearrange data over time, recollection is like a puzzle. Because our minds try to rearrange data over time, recollection is like a puzzle.
According to memory expert and psychologist Elizabeth Loftus, recalling information is "more analogous to putting puzzle pieces together than retrieving a video tape," as she wrote in a 2010 article for Scientific American. These schemas could be influenced by bias and social values to some extent. Schemas are therefore capable of 'fitting in' with our preexisting knowledge.
To learn more about memory, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/14829385
#SPJ1
interrogating the construct validity of association claims could mean asking about all of the following except:
Answers
interrogating the construct validity of association claims could mean asking about all of the following except C. Internal
because: Querying Association Claims - Association Claims do not assert causality, so inner validity is irrelevant to queries. Internal validity is concerned with claiming that one variable changes another. To assess whether a study has construct validity, consumers of the study should ask whether the study adequately measured the key concepts of the study. For example, reading research should provide compelling evidence that reading tests do indeed measure reading comprehension.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON interrogating SEE:
https://brainly.com/question/22898599
#SPJ4
You and a friend are under age, walking down the street with an open container of beer. You are arrested for “Minor in Possession." The police never advised you of your rights. Can you have the charges thrown out?
Answers
No you may not have the charges that have been placed on you thrown out.
Minor in PossessionThis clause already establishes that just being caught with alcoholic beverages was illegal for the people that are considered minors.
When such a person purchases, consumes and are found in possession of these items, they are considered to have committed an illegal act.
Therefore even though you were not advised of your rights, you are still considered to have violated a law.
Read more on Minor in Possession here:
https://brainly.com/question/4196231
How do public bills and private bills differ?
Answers
Answer: Your welcome!
Explanation:
Public bills are bills that have wide-ranging implications for the public and affect the public as a whole. These bills can propose new laws, amend existing laws, or repeal laws. Private bills, on the other hand, are bills that are tailored to the needs of individuals or small groups of people. Private bills can grant special rights or privileges, such as a change in name, the granting of a title, or the granting of a pension, to a specific individual or group. Private bills are typically introduced at the request of a member of parliament or a private organization.
Parking and passing require coordination of many different driving skills combined with a continuous __________________.
Searching process
Thought process
Maneuver
Show of patience
Answers
Answer:
definitaly thought process but serching process to
Explanation:
Parking and passing require coordination of many different driving skills combined with a continuous searching process.
Parking and PassingWhile driving a vehicle on the road, it is important to be alert and be cautious. There are certain traffic rules to be followed while driving.
Parking one's car and passing over another car requires skills and rules to follow.
One requires coordination of driving skills along with continuous searching process for parking and passing a vehicle.
There are several types of parking maneuvers :
AngledParallelPerpendicularPassing a vehicle requires a good judgement.
Learn more about "driving" here :
https://brainly.com/question/21945861
Helppp please!
From the standpoint of labeling theory, deviance and crime are not absolutes - a behavior can be called deviant or criminal only when it violates the norms of some group. Obviously, this suggests that definitions of deviance will change as societies advance.
Discuss what behaviors now considered acceptable were formerly thought to be deviant or criminal.
Are there any now considered deviant or criminal that were once considered acceptable?
Is there a trend toward defining more behaviors as deviant and criminal or more as acceptable?
Do you detect any trends in the process of change? If so, what are they?
Answers
According to the labeling theory, authorities' labels have a negative impact on the powerless and lead to criminal and deviant behavior.
Labeling is a crucial idea related to official bias in intergenerational transmission. According to the labeling theory, criminal justice reforms tend to make offenders worse. To be more specific, labeling happens when someone's criminal behavior worsens after being involved in the justice system. The labeling theory proposes that when a label for deviance is placed on a person, that person adopts the label by engaging in the behaviors, actions, and attitudes that are associated with the label. According to the labeling theory, when others impose an identity on someone, that person becomes deviant.To know more about crime here
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Benny was arrested by New York Police and charged with the armed robbery of a taxicab driver. While Benny was in jail waiting for his trial, a New York undercover officer was placed in Benny’s cell. Before the officer asked any questions, Benny said that he had robbed the cab driver. Benny’s statement was used against him at trial, despite his objection that he was not read his Miranda Rights, in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Question: Should the court allow Benny’s statement to be used in court?
Answers
which o the following united states supreme court decision established the existence of the exclusionaty rule?
Answers
In Weeks v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled in 1914 that the federal government may not use illegally obtained evidence to secure criminal convictions in federal court, establishing the "exclusionary rule."
Which of the following rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court established the exclusionary rule quizlet?The Supreme Court established a rule eliminating evidence from a criminal trial that the police got unlawfully or illegally in Mapp v. Ohio. The states' "Exclusionary Rule" is in effect. The Weeks v. United States case established the norm.
Which case from the U.S. Supreme Court served as the precedent for the exclusionary rule quizlet?The exclusionary rule was established as a result of Weeks v. U.S. the knowledge that, in accordance with constitutional requirements of due process, incriminating information must be seized before it can be used as evidence in a criminal trial. This understanding is based on U.S. Supreme Court precedent.
Which decision of the Supreme Court is most closely related to the exclusionary rule?Weeks v. United States provided the first explanation of the exclusionary rule (1914). The U.S. Supreme Court decided in that case that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unauthorized searches and seizures should be interpreted to prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal prosecutions.
Know more about supreme court:
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
urisdiction gives federal courts the authority to hear certain kinds of cases. to make decisions based on the law. to hear arguments from different parties. to make decisions based on precedents.
Answers
The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.
Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.
Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.
Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
evaluate based on transformative constitutionalism
Answers
Answer: human dignity, equality, and freedom with a legal system
Explanation:
A state law that violates the U.S. Constitution:
O Can be enforced by that state's government only.
O Can be enforced by the United States Supreme Court only.
o Can be enforced by the federal gchernment only.
Cannot be enforced.
Answers
Answer:
Not sure, but this helps! :)
Explanation:
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. Basically, if a federal and state law contradicts, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
The physiological effects of marijuana greatly differ from those associated with alcohol.
True
Or
False
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
alcohol is a depressant and marijuana is a stimulant
If you're convicted of 2 or more moving violations within a 48 month period, your license could be suspended.
a. True
b. False
Answers
Brainliest??
The information provided is generally accurate. Many states suspend driver's licenses when a driver is convicted of multiple moving violations within a set period, which can vary by state.
Explanation:The statement given is generally true. Driving laws vary by state, but many states do have regulations that if a driver is convicted of multiple moving violations within a specific time frame, their license can be temporarily suspended. A moving violation is any fracture of the law committed by a driver while the vehicle is in motion. Examples of moving violations include speeding, running a red light, or reckless driving. These laws aim to maintain safety on the road by discouraging repeated reckless behavior.
Learn more about Driving Suspension Laws here:https://brainly.com/question/37593330
#SPJ2
Which is true about Plato’s Five Regimes of human government?
referendum
court order
repossession
executive order
Answers
Answer:
Jesus loves you
in the book night by elie wiesel explain how the father/son roles had been reversed in the case of elie and his father. chapter 8
Answers
Answer:
The roles of father and son are truly reversed in Chapter 8 of Elie Wiesel's novel "Night," when Elie and his father, Shlomo, endure the challenges of the concentration camp together. The severe environment and terrible events they face cause this reversal.
Elie's father had been the dominant role in their relationship at first, offering guidance and encouragement. Their roles, however, begin to evolve when they are subjected to the horrors of the concentration camp. Elie is becoming increasingly responsible for his father's physical and mental well-being.
Elie recalls the terrible winter circumstances in the camp and the physical toll it takes on his father in Chapter 8. He talks about how he must look after his father, making sure he has enough food and shielding him from the camp's violence. Elie's devotion to his father's survival is clear when he gives up a piece of bread for him, despite the fact that he is starving himself.
Furthermore, Elie becomes his father's mental and physical support. He attempts to encourage and motivate his father to persevere in the face of adversity. Elie's job as a caregiver becomes critical as he attempts to hide his father from the worst aspects of their circumstances, providing him with comfort and hope.
Throughout the chapter, Elie's actions demonstrate his deep love and devotion to his father. He takes on the responsibility of caring for him, ensuring his survival and providing emotional support. The reversal of their roles showcases the extent of their bond and the lengths Elie is willing to go to protect and care for his father.
Overall, in Chapter 8 of "Night," Elie Wiesel depicts a reversal of father/son roles, with Elie taking on the role of carer and protector for his father in the face of the horrific hardships of the concentration camp.
In the book Night by Elie Wiesel, the father/son roles had been reversed in the case of Elie and his father. This is particularly highlighted in chapter 8.
In this chapter, Elie and his father are both in the same concentration camp and are struggling to survive. Elie’s father is weak, sick, and is not able to keep up with the work that is required of him. This leads to Elie becoming his father’s caretaker. He helps his father with his work, carries his father's weight when he can no longer walk, and feeds him whatever scraps of food he can find.
The relationship between Elie and his father is one of love and devotion. Elie cares for his father, despite the terrible circumstances they are in. However, as his father's health deteriorates, Elie begins to feel a sense of anger and frustration. He becomes angry at his father for not being able to take care of himself and for being a burden on him. He is also angry at himself for feeling this way and for not being able to do more to help his father. Despite these feelings, Elie continues to care for his father until the very end.
To learn more about Elie Wiesel visit here:
brainly.com/question/15099354
#SPJ11
B. False
What does carbon monoxide do?
A. It increases the flow of oxygen in the blood.
B. It decreases the flow of carbon dioxide in the blood.
C. It prevents the free flow of oxygen in the blood.
Answers
Oxygen cannot circulate freely in the blood when carbon monoxide is present. Less oxygen is transferred to bodily tissues and key organs including the brain and heart when carbon monoxide binds to hemoglobin. As a result, choice (C) is the right response.
What is Carbon Monoxide?Carbon monoxide is a gas that is colorless, extremely toxic, odorless, tasteless, and combustible. It is also somewhat less dense than air. One carbon atom and one oxygen atom bound together by three bonds make up carbon monoxide. The oxocarbon family's simplest molecule is this one.
Any time you burn fuel in a car or truck, a tiny engine, a stove, a lantern, a grill, a fireplace, a gas range, or a furnace, gases are produced that include CO. CO can accumulate indoors and become toxic when breathed by humans and animals.
Hence, option (C) is the right choice.
Learn more about carbon monoxide, from:
brainly.com/question/7154661
#SPJ1
T/F Gatekeeping under Daubert/Kumho/Rule 702 requires that the trial court find the presence of sufficient assurances of the correctness of the explanative theory as actually applied to the facts, data, or opinions sufficiently established to exist.
Answers
According to Daubert/Kumho/Rule 702, gatekeeping demands that the trial court determine whether there are enough guarantees that the explanative theory is accurate when it is really applied to the facts, information, or opinions that are adequately proven to exist. True
Gatekeeping refers to the process by which trial courts evaluate the admissibility of expert testimony under the Daubert standard, which was established by the US Supreme Court in 1993, and subsequently expanded by Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael in 1999. The standard requires that trial courts act as "gatekeepers" and ensure that expert testimony is both relevant and reliable.
To meet the reliability requirement, the trial court must determine whether the expert's testimony is based on a scientifically valid theory or technique and whether it has been properly applied to the facts of the case. This requires the court to evaluate the underlying methodology, principles, and techniques used by the expert, as well as the data and facts on which they relied in forming their opinion.
The court must determine whether there are sufficient "assurances of the correctness of the explanative theory as actually applied to the facts, data, or opinions sufficiently established to exist." This means that the court must evaluate whether the expert's testimony is based on sound scientific methodology and principles, whether their techniques have been properly applied, and whether their opinions are based on reliable data and facts.
To learn more about gatekeeping
https://brainly.com/question/30450632
#SPJ4
the fact that stacy peterson was drew's alibi on the night of kathleen savio's death is an example of what type of evidence
Answers
The fact that Stacy Peterson was Drew Peterson's alibi on the night of Kathleen Savio's death is an example of Relevant evidence.
Relevant evidence refers to any information that has a tendency to make a fact of the case more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. In this case, Drew Peterson was a suspect in the death of his ex-wife Kathleen Savio, and the fact that his current wife Stacy was his alibi on the night of the death is relevant to the investigation.
The evidence is relevant because it goes to the issue of whether Drew Peterson was involved in Kathleen Savio's death. If he had a solid alibi, it would tend to make it less likely that he committed the crime. However, if Stacy Peterson's alibi was false or if she had been coerced into providing an alibi, it would tend to make it more likely that Drew Peterson was involved.
Relevant evidence is important in a criminal case because it helps to establish the facts of the case and determine whether the accused is guilty or innocent. The admissibility of evidence in court is determined by the judge, who must weigh its probative value against any potential prejudice or unfairness to the accused.
Know more about Evidence here :
https://brainly.com/question/31721636
#SPJ11
What was the issue in the Garratt v. Dailey case?
Answers
Answer:
The Garratt v. Dailey case involved the issue of intentional tort, specifically the tort of battery. In this case, the plaintiff, Brian Garratt, alleged that the defendant, Denny Dailey, intentionally and unlawfully pulled a chair from beneath him as he was attempting to sit down, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. The main question in the case was whether the defendant's actions constituted intentional battery, even though he claimed it was an accident. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant's actions were indeed intentional and constituted battery, regardless of his intent to harm.
I believe this is your answer, I hope this helps!
Why would the city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes within city limits?
Answers
The city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes because:
The city council is said to be trying to stop having litigation that is brought by or as a result of visitors and residents visit. This is based on the fact that if or when they injured themselves on the town's rustic sidewalks and trails when they are wearing high-heeled shoes.
What is an ordinance?An ordinance is known to be passed due to any case of an emergency and it is one that needs a two-thirds vote of the whole governing body for passage.
The city did pass the ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes to avoid any form of litigation.
Learn more about California from
https://brainly.com/question/26015261
Question 2
Prior notice deposit means bank shall returns the deposited amount without need for notice from customer
А
True
B
False
Answers
Compare and contrast classical approaches of explaining crime to positivist approaches of explaining crime
Answers
This is the element that requires that no laws or statutes be violated, for example, if a construction contractor is not licensed in Oregon then they would be in violation of a State statute?
Select one:
a. agreement
b. capacity
c. legality
d. consideration