When a private individual brings a suit against a company for breaking a contract, this is an example of ________ law.
a. criminal b. civil c. constitutional d. common

Answer:

D. prior police encounters and seriousness of the delinquency

Explanation:

(the others seem a bit bias) please let me know if I am wrong :}

Answer:

parole is so a prisoner can enjpy some freedom but probation is like being free but you can do anything

Explanation:

Answer:

definitaly thought process but serching process to

Explanation:

Parking and passing require coordination of many different driving skills combined with a continuous searching process.

While driving a vehicle on the road, it is important to be alert and be cautious. There are certain traffic rules to be followed while driving.

Parking one's car and passing over another car requires skills and rules to follow.

One requires coordination of driving skills along with continuous searching process for parking and passing a vehicle.

There are several types of parking maneuvers :

Passing a vehicle requires a good judgement.

Learn more about "driving" here :

https://brainly.com/question/21945861

Answer:

b

Explanation:

The individual is planning to involve in the activity of hunt that involves strenuous physical activity and for this, he should begin to get in shape.

It's a matter of perception when it comes to the moment defining strenuous activity or vigorous exercise, as it depends on how difficult a particular activity feels to perform.

A brisk walk may be difficult for someone who is out of shape, but it may not be at all difficult for a marathon runner.

Before getting into the hunting activity, the individual has to get involved in the physical activities and that needs a person to be in the shape and the perfect desired adorable get up to perform the activity.  

Therefore, the correct option is A.

To know more about strenuous physical activity, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/1840279

The matching law suggests that the reinforcement schedules used for behavior modification should be based on the principle of matching Therefore, the answer is: a. Concurrent

which means that the relative rate of reinforcement for different behaviors should match the relative rate of occurrence of those behaviors. This principle applies to concurrent schedules of reinforcement. In addition to concurrent schedules of reinforcement, the matching law also has implications for two other types of reinforcement schedules used in behavior modification:

Ratio Schedules: Ratio schedules involve reinforcing a behavior based on the number of times the behavior is performed. The matching law suggests that the ratio of reinforcement should match the ratio of behavior. For example, if a particular behavior occurs more frequently than another behavior, it should receive a higher rate of reinforcement.

Interval Schedules: Interval schedules involve reinforcing a behavior based on the passage of time or the first occurrence of the behavior after a certain time interval has elapsed. The matching law suggests that the duration of the interval should match the relative occurrence of the behavior. If a behavior occurs more frequently during a specific time interval, it should receive a higher rate of reinforcement within that interval.

To learn more about  reinforcement

brainly.com/question/5162646

#SPJ4

The president's expressed powers include all of the following categories EXCEPT "b. partisan."

Expressed powers are specifically granted to the president by the Constitution.

These powers cover a wide range of categories, including military (a), judicial (c), diplomatic (d), and executive (e) powers.

However, partisan powers, which involve political party-related activities and decisions, are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution as a category of expressed powers for the president. Thus, the correct answer is b. partisan.

To know more about president's expressed powers refer here: https://brainly.com/question/14720932#

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is C. because the mother did not push the cart but was near her daughter all times,  the mother DID supervise her but the girl was pushing the cart and she DID crash but she wasn't planning to crash so the girl wasn't fully negligent but the mother was kinda responsible so that leaves the only option that still stands is C.

Yes, since the girl's mother accepted responsibility for her child's behavior. A further explanation is below.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/24662070

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Confederation stated regarding the thirteen colonies that were present and all were to be joined together with equal rights.

The Articles established a federal union of independent states with a meager central administration that delegated most authority to the state legislatures.

The thirteen colonies were aware that they required some kind of formal authority to bring them all together. They desired codified regulations that were accepted by all the regions. The Articles granted Congress the authority to establish a militia, pass laws, and generate money, among other responsibilities.

Learn more about the Articles of Confederation, Here:

brainly.com/question/13608970

#SPJ1

Answer:

A judge in Illinois will issue an arrest warrant against Moby to to extradite Moby to Illinois. That may not be legal. The judge will issue an illegal arrest warrant. But that really is how the real system works. I know this from first hand experience. I have gotten a number of illegal arrest warrants and I still haven't found a lawyer because that are participating cogs in the messed up system.

Explanation:

The law of total probability states that for a partition of a sample space into mutually exclusive events, the probability of any event in the sample space is equal to the sum of the probabilities of the events in the partition that are contained in the event.

Formally, if S is the sample space, \(A_{1}\), \(A_{2}\), \(A_{3}\), …, \(A_{n}\) are mutually exclusive events that form a partition of S, and B is any event in S, then the probability of B is given by:

P(B) = P(B ∩ \(A_{1}\)) + P(B ∩ \(A_{2}\)) + P(B ∩ \(A_{3}\)) + … + P(B ∩ \(A_{n}\))

This can also be written using conditional probability as:

P(B) = P(\(A_{1}\))P( B | \(A_{1}\) ) + P(\(A_{2}\))P(B | \(A_{2}\)) + P(\(A_{3}\))P(B | \(A_{3}\)) + … + P(\(A_{n}\))P(B | \(A_{n}\) )

where P( B | \(A_{i}\) ) is the conditional probability of B given \(A_{i}\), and P(\(A_{i}\)) is the probability of \(A_{i}\).

The law of total probability is often used to find the probability of an event when the sample space is partitioned into multiple mutually exclusive events. It helps to connect the different events that can happen in a sample space and also helps to calculate the probability of a certain event by breaking it down into simpler events.

To learn more about law of total probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14294221

#SPJ11

The statement is TRUE. In order to get court supervision for a traffic offense or traffic violation, a minor or not of legal age must appear in the court with their parent or with their legal guardian and finish a traffic safety school.

However, even without court supervision, the parent or legal guardian of a minor can revoke their kid's driver's license at any time just before the age of 18.

Additionally, one cannot drive in other states if they are just a permit holder. Many states have varied traffic safety schools, regulations or laws governing learners' permits for students. There are several limitations on the learner's permit that prevent permit holders from driving alone or outside of their state. Minor drivers or those who are under the age of eighteen must carry their training permission for 9 months before obtaining their driver's license.

Learn the importance of the national highway traffic safety administration: https://brainly.com/question/11342968

#SPJ4

Civil cases involving large amounts of money are handled by limited jurisdiction.

A legal disagreement involving two or more parties is the subject of a federal civil case. When one of the disputing parties files a complaint and pays the requisite filing fee, a civil action is declared to have begun. A request to proceed in forma pauperis may be submitted by a plaintiff who is unable to pay the filing fee.

The cost is waived if the request is approved. The plaintiff files a complaint with the court and "serves" a copy of the complaint on the defendant to start a civil case in federal court. The complaint outlines the plaintiff's losses or injuries, demonstrates the defendant's responsibility for the damage, establishes the court's jurisdiction, and requests that the court grant remedy. A plaintiff may ask for financial compensation for the harm.

Learn more about Civil Cases here:

https://brainly.com/question/4085935

#SPJ4

Answer:The Supreme Court, under Chief Justice Earl Warren, agreed. In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court reversed the Arizona Supreme Court decision and declared that Miranda's confession could not be used as evidence in a criminal trial.

Explanation:

Answer:

I believe it is conservativism. the people are called conservatives

The court would have to look to a variety of sources of law in order to decide which state is the correct place for the lawsuit to be brought. These sources may include the constitution, common law, statutes, and regulations. In particular, the court may consider any relevant state or federal laws that govern the subject matter of the lawsuit,

as well as any applicable rules of civil procedure or jurisdictional rules that determine where a case may be brought. Ultimately, the court's decision will be based on a careful analysis of all relevant legal authorities and the facts of the case.
To determine the correct place for a lawsuit to be brought, the court would primarily look at the jurisdiction and venue rules, which are derived from a combination of sources, including statutes, regulations, and common law. In some cases, constitutional provisions may also be relevant. The specific source of law will depend on the jurisdiction and the nature of the case.

learn more about lawsuit

https://brainly.com/question/19573641

#SPJ11

Explanation/answer:

9th:

gives a ton of freedom to the people basically saying that they have the freedom to retain the rights even though they were not specifically discussed in the bill of rights, this limits the power of the government because it gives the people more power

10th:

Lets the states impose their own laws special to those states. having its own law would let the state become nearly as powerful as the federal government, so that takes away power from the federal government.

Honestly, it's good that the federal government doesn't have all the power otherwise it would be kinda like a dictatorship.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:There is a heightened risk for everyone

Explanation:

The correct answer is D. Constrained data items (CDIs) and unconstrained data items (UDIs).

The Clark-Wilson security model is a framework for enforcing data integrity in information systems. It divides information into two types of data items: constrained data items (CDIs) and unconstrained data items (UDIs).

CDIs are data items that are subject to well-defined, static rules, and procedures, and are protected from unauthorized modification by a set of controls. These controls ensure that data is accessed, modified, and transmitted only by authorized users and in authorized ways.

UDIs, on the other hand, are data items that are not subject to such static rules and procedures. Instead, UDIs are processed by transformation procedures (TPs), which apply dynamic, context-dependent rules to ensure data integrity. TPs transform the data from one valid state to another valid state, according to a set of well-defined rules. By enforcing data integrity at the CDI and UDI levels, the Clark-Wilson security model provides a comprehensive framework for maintaining data integrity in information systems.

Learn more about Clark-Wilson :

https://brainly.com/question/30407289

#SPJ4

Answer:

b

Explanation:

this is stupid

Answer:

Lieutenant

edge 2021

Explanation:

Over the past five years, as demands for reform have mounted in the aftermath of police violence in cities like Ferguson, Mo., Baltimore and now Minneapolis, police unions have emerged as one of the most significant roadblocks to change. The greater the political pressure for reform, the more defiant the unions often are in resisting it — with few city officials, including liberal leaders, able to overcome their opposition. They aggressively protect the rights of members accused of misconduct, often in arbitration hearings that they have battled to keep behind closed doors. And they have also been remarkably effective at fending off broader change, using their political clout and influence to derail efforts to increase accountability. While rates of union membership have dropped by half nationally since the early 1980s, to 10 percent, higher membership rates among police unions give them resources they can spend on campaigns and litigation to block reform. A single New York City police union has spent more than $1 million on state and local races since 2014.

According to the text, Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina have eliminated the potential risk of drug smuggling through the mail in their prison systems.

These states have implemented strict policies that limit the types of mail that prisoners can receive, such as prohibiting the use of colored envelopes and requiring all mail to be scanned before being delivered to the inmates. In addition, these states have also implemented drug-detection technology to prevent drugs from entering the prison through other means such as visitations. By eliminating the risk of drug smuggling, these states hope to decrease violence and increase safety within their prison systems. However, some critics argue that these policies may violate inmates' rights to receive mail and could potentially lead to further issues such as contraband trade within the prison.

To know more about the policies visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30527789

#SPJ11

Answer:

no, the answer is false.

Explanation:

Answer:

make me brainalist and keep smiling dude

Explanation:

There are seven widely accepted methods of interpretation that shed light on the meaning of the Constitution.

Answer:

The Justices of the Supreme Court are responsible for interpreting the meanings of all the. laws within the Constitution and for applying those interpretations to cases in which.

Answer:

Option e is not a safe practice for drivers

Explanation:

Answer:

We all want a cri- justice system that's sensible, effective, and creates a safe society with less cr*me

Explanation:

Answer:

i actually dont think that death penalty should be legal. unless the person killed BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of innocent people or did so many bad things that police and stuff even lost track,i think that anyone should go on death row. (or whatever its called). poeple that go to prison for years still have a chance at life. they have a chance to change and stuff.

i think that a . death penalty for ANYONE is too harsh

thats my opinion :)

Answer: A

Explanation: