what kind of law deals with punishing and rehabilitating offenders
Answer:
Criminal law deals with punishing and rehabilitating offenders.
what is the formal investigation prior to trial in which the defense uses various methods to obtain information from the prosecution to prepare for trial?
Answer:
Explanation:0000000000000000000000000
Examine the factors that led to Nkrumah's effective
foreign policy formulation and implementation
Nkrumah's effective foreign policy formulation and implementation can be attributed to several key factors that played a significant role in his approach. Emphasis on economic development and self-reliance.
One factor was Nkrumah's strong leadership and charismatic personality, which allowed him to assert Ghana's position on the global stage and build alliances with other countries. Additionally, his Pan-African ideology and commitment to decolonization resonated with many African nations, leading to increased cooperation and support for Ghana's foreign policy objectives.
Another factor was Nkrumah's strategic use of diplomacy and international institutions. He actively engaged with international organizations such as the United Nations and the Non-Aligned Movement, utilizing these platforms to promote Ghana's interests and advocate for African unity.
Furthermore, Nkrumah's focus on economic development and self-reliance also played a role in shaping his foreign policy. By seeking partnerships and investments from various nations, he aimed to strengthen Ghana's economy and reduce dependence on external powers.
Nkrumah's effective foreign policy formulation and implementation were influenced by his leadership qualities, Pan-African ideology, diplomatic efforts, and emphasis on economic development and self-reliance.
To know more about foreign policy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30416079
#SPJ11
These professionals use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law:
The professionals who use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law are called legal luminaries.
Who is a professional lawyer?A professional lawyer or a legal luminary is a professional or expert who is:
Qualified to offer legal adviceRepresent someone in a law court.A lawyer can be addressed as:
An attorneyA solicitorA counselorA barrister.Thus, the professionals who use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law are called legal luminaries.
Learn more about the legal profession at https://brainly.com/question/16040577
#SPJ1
Answer:
These professionals use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law:
forensic linguists.
Explanation:
Edge 2022 Unit Test
2) The Hilton family owned the Ritz Hotel. Mr Hilton was the managing director. Control over the voting in the company was managed by three classes of shares. These share classes were:
Class A - Mr Hilton held these shares and had unrestricted voting rights;
Class B - Mrs Hilton held these shares and could only vote after Mr Hilton died; and Class
C - the Hilton children held these shares but had no voting rights at all. They still had profit sharing rights.
When Mr and Mrs Hilton divorced, Mr Hilton issued Class B shares to his two sons. This was to ensure that his sons maintained control over the company instead of his daughters who had sided with Mrs Hilton during the divorce.
The daughters challenged the share issue and seek your advice regarding their rights and any remedies that might be available to them.
In particular the daughters seek your advice on whether Mr Hilton has breached any of his duties as a director and on what basis they might be able to dispute the issue of shares?
The daughters can dispute the issue of shares on the grounds that it amounts to unfair prejudice against them as minority shareholders. As per the legal provision under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, a minority shareholder may complain that the affairs of the company are being conducted in a way that is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of shareholders.
The daughters might also argue that the issue of shares was a breach of Mr Hilton's fiduciary duties as a director, which may be challenged in court. It is the responsibility of the directors of a company to ensure that the interests of the company and its shareholders are safeguarded. This responsibility is also recognized in case law, which has held that the directors must act in good faith and in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. Therefore, it is advisable for the daughters to seek legal advice to determine the strength of their case.
Their legal counsel might advise them to explore the possibility of mediation or negotiation to find a mutually acceptable solution. The daughters can also consider raising the matter with other shareholders to seek their support and build a coalition.
To know more about Prejudicial visit-
brainly.com/question/31710982
#SPJ11
Which term means "the area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and private life?" Oa. lien Ob. metes and bounds Oc. curtflage 0 d. encroachment
The Correct answer is Option C. Curtilage is the term that denotes "the area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and private life."
It refers to the immediate surroundings of a dwelling that are intimately connected to the residential property and where activities related to privacy and domestic life take place. The concept of curtilage encompasses various spaces, such as the yard, garden, patio, or any other structures adjacent to the home. The legal significance of curtilage lies in the protection it receives under the law.
Similar to the home itself, curtilage is afforded certain legal rights and protections, particularly in relation to privacy. For example, the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, and this protection extends to curtilage. Law enforcement generally needs a warrant or a recognized exception to enter and search the curtilage without violating an individual's constitutional rights.
Understanding the boundaries of curtilage is crucial in legal contexts, such as determining the scope of a search warrant or evaluating whether certain activities or intrusions are within the protected zone. Courts consider factors like proximity to the home, the nature of the use, measures taken to protect privacy, and societal expectations in determining the extent of curtilage.
In summary, curtilage refers to the area surrounding a dwelling where intimate activities associated with the sanctity of home and private life occur. It enjoys legal protection similar to the home itself and is crucial in defining privacy rights and boundaries in legal matters.
To know more about Curtilage, visit : brainly.com/question/32553716
#SPJ11
What does “unanimous” mean? Why do you think jury verdicts must be unanimous?
One technique to guarantee that a defendant won't be found guilty unless the prosecution has proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt is to have.
What is court?A court is any person or institution with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disputes between parties and administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative affairs in conformity with the rule of law. A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the legal jurisdiction to hear and settle disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military issues.
A unanimous jury verdict. To successfully convict a criminal defendant, prosecutors must persuade the jury that there is no possibility of reasonable doubt in their minds.
Therefore, By, “unanimous” means being of one thought; receiving the assent and agreement of all. indisputably.
Learn more about the court here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ2
How can rights be the flip side of responsibilities?
Right can be fliped to responsibilities because inorder to get rights you have to get reponsibilities and be responsible with your rights
Which of the following is not a function of the Federal Trade Commission?
What would be the hardest thing to deal with when you are a forensic scientist, collecting evidence or securing a crime scene? And what would be the most interesting part?
Answer:
the hardest thing to deal with is people that are with you will sometimes get your head messed up so make sure your partner is someone who can help you
As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, courts can require states to
-Keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.
-Change the number of voting districts within the state.
-Appoint government officials if voting districts are unfair.
-Redraw voting districts that are roughly equal in population.
Answer:
As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, courts can require states to
keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.<<< Correctchange the number of voting districts within the state.appoint government officials if voting districts are unfair.redraw voting districts that are roughly equal in population.Explanation:
Oct. 2021 Edge
Because of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, the courts can require states to keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.
What is the case of Baker v. Carr?The Supreme court ruling here is important because its established the right of federal courts to review redistricting issues.
Hence, the case ensured that courts can require states to keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Baker v. Carr
brainly.com/question/1344638
#SPJ2
Give three examples of government agencies that draft laws
Answer:
1) United States Congress.
2) Federal judiciary of the United States.
3) Executive Office of the President.
Explanation:
hope it helps ;)
If you realize there's alcohol or medication affecting your body you should
Explanation:
stop immediately and seek medical advice before further usage
Answer:
you should wait out for the affect to be over or take medication
Explanation:
It relaxes your body and puts it to a more suitable potion and usually you loose control of emotions so meditation definitely calms you and gives you a better ability to control those actions. As for the wait for the affect to be over part then it'll just put you to a normal non drunk mindset.
Thinking about the circular flow of income and the data you just analyzed, compose one well-written paragraph that
shows how you can apply the circular flow of income to the questions you just answered. In your writing, be sure to use
proper economic terminology, such as the labels in the circular flow model e.
Answer:
Circular flow of income is a theory that states that economy is a system of dependencies, flows of goods, services, factors of production and payments between all participants of economic life. It shows how the exchange process works, in which the government, enterprises, and households participate.
Households are fed by streams of payments in the form of wages, pensions and other similar benefits. Then they dispose of their income in such a way that they return some of the streams in the form of taxes, some leave as savings, in return for which they receive services and goods of public interest. The remaining stream of payments after these operations is passed back to enterprises (as a result of the purchase of goods and services).
Businesses, like households, spend part of their income on taxes and savings, receiving in return government investment from the state. Businesses obtain streams of labor and production services from households and can therefore produce goods.
Answer:
As consumer spending increased, less savings were placed in the financial sector. This resulted in reduced business investment. The government also spent less, meaning it injected less money into the economy. There was a trade deficit because imports were greater than exports. This means there was more leakage through imports than there was money injected through exports.
Explanation:
edmentum
How can experts match a bullet to a specific make or model of gun?
OJ Simpson's "Dream Team" of lawyers and
forensic experts were able to raise serious doubts about the CSI work
and analysis of evidence by the LAPD. Below is a list of some of the
issues raised by OJ's defense team. Explain the errors that were made
with more specific details.
Answer:
On June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman, were found dead at Brown's home. Prosecutors argued that Simpson killed his ex-wife and her lover out of jealousy. Prosecutors began by reporting Nicole Brown Simpson's call to the emergency center from 1989. In it, Nicole Brown said she was afraid Simpson would harm her. Prosecutors also came up with Simpson's DNA material and shoe prints from him, found at the scene of the crime. Dozens of experts stated that Simpson must have been at the scene of the crime. There was a lot of circumstantial scientific evidence.
Simpson hired a team of expensive attorneys led by Robert Shapiro and later Johnnie Cochran. Cochran was nationally known as a lawyer for (mainly black) celebrities and specialized in cases involving discrimination or police brutality. From the outset, the defense was based on the charge of racism. The lawyers claimed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud by depositing evidence against Simpson at the crime scene. The leader of the investigation into the double murder (Mark Fuhrman) was called a racist by the defense, and the lawyers found footage in which Fuhrman had used the N word.
While prosecutors believed they had a solid case and expected a conviction, polls showed that a majority of black residents of the United States believed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud. Most white residents of the United States were convinced of Simpson's guilt. As the jury's verdict drew closer, racial tension rose, and some politicians feared a repeat of the Los Angeles race riots a few years earlier. On October 3, 1995 Simpson was acquitted of murder by the jury.
Which of the following is NOT one of the basic rules that must be followed when shaping a policy?
A. Policy should never conflict with law
B. Policy must be able to stand up in court if challenged
C. Policy should be agreed upon by all employees and management
D. Policy must be properly supported and administered
The option that is NOT one of the basic rules that must be followed when shaping a policy is C. Policy should be agreed upon by all employees and management
What does it mean to create policies?When you formulate something, like a strategy or proposal, you invent it after carefully considering all the intricacies.
The "preparation" or "pre-baking" of the decisions is the responsibility of those working on this phase of the process. This means that prior to the stage of negotiation and agreement-making, the draft policy is prepared and blended.
Note everyone can agree on one thing or policy hence option C is correct.
Learn more about policy from
https://brainly.com/question/13965038
#SPJ1
Someone please help me with this question!!!!
—————————————-
What's the difference between individual and societal culpability for criminal behavior?
Answer:
the others are already answered
Explanation:
For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action
what is school based assessment
Answer:
a test of your school knowledge
Explanation:
A school based assessment is a process that requires the teachers to mark their students' work for fair assessment of their periodic performance.
The assessment is used as a information to increase students learning and development
In conclusion, the school based assessment is important because its allows to assess the performance of students.
Read more about school based assessment
brainly.com/question/26921511
TOPIC
You are assigned to a walking beat downtown, and every
morning you stop into a breakfast shop and have a cup of
coffee only. The owner does not charge you. After some
citizen complaints about the parking situation in the area,
the station has directed you to ticket all illegally parked
cars. As you are tagging the cars in front of the breakfast
shop, the owner comes out furious and asks what are you
doing? He states rather loudly, "I give you free coffee every
day and this is how you repay me"?
• How would you respond?
•
• Was there an implied consent that the free coffee
would be reimbursed by granting favors to the owner?
On a larger scale, could this lead to a perception of
corruption of the officer looked the other way or
warned customers that if they were parked illegally
and didn't move their cars they would be ticketed?
• What would be a solution to this issue?
In this case, I would respond by saying that giving free breakfast can be considered as a generous effort by the shop owner but it can never mean an implied consent for grant of favors.
Moreover, this could very well be perceived as corruption by the officers as they leave people without tickets despite illegally parking the vehicles and the grant of favors like the shop owner would also amount to bribery and corruption.
A viable solution to issue would be to make a rule to post proper advertisements about the penalty for illegal parking should be done. These advertisements would act as awareness as well as warning for people and then officers don't need to be lenient on people who still break the rules. This way, the issue of corruption allegations and illegal parking both can be resolved together.
To know more about Corruption:
brainly.com/question/15270178
#SPJ1
what is the social security taxable earnings limit applicable to wages received in 2022?
the social security taxable earnings limit applicable to wages received in 2022 : limit is $147,000. You won't pay more than $9,114 in Social Security taxes in 2022 ($147,000 x 6.2%).
The amount deducted from your earned income to cover Social Security payments is known as the OASDI tax. You forfeit a percentage of your compensation, and your company is required to pay a corresponding amount. The funding for the benefit payments that retirees receive comes from employees and their companies all around the nation. The concept behind Social Security benefits is that you pay into them throughout your lifetime. After you retire, current employees will continue to make contributions to the fund while you continue to receive benefits. The system can maintain itself in this way.
The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), which houses the OASDI tax and the Medicare tax, is the reason why the acronym FICA could appear on your paycheck.
Your Social Security payout will increase if you delay retirement because of the Social Security tax. You will have paid the tax for a longer period of time if you put off retirement until you reach your full retirement age (FRA). (Also, the system will have less time to give you benefits the later you start claiming them.) Working more hours could result in a higher 35-year average salary, which would raise your benefit amount.
To know more about Social Security:
https://brainly.com/question/23913541
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements correctly reflects the role of a federal administrative law judge (ALJ)?
A. An ALJ presides over an administrative hearing and issues an order that, when final, may be reviewed by a court.
B. An ALJ’s final order may only be overturned by a court if it is unreasonable.
C. An ALJ’s final order may be re-tried in a federal district court.
D. An ALJ’s final order may not be reviewed by a court.
A. An ALJ presides over an administrative hearing and issues an order that, when final, may be reviewed by a court.
This statement correctly reflects the role of a federal administrative law judge (ALJ). ALJs are responsible for presiding over administrative hearings in which parties present evidence and arguments related to disputes or controversies involving the agency they work for.
After hearing all the evidence, the ALJ will issue a decision or order that resolves the matter at hand. This order may be subject to review by an appellate court if either party is dissatisfied with the outcome. Therefore, option A is the correct statement.
Option B is incorrect because ALJ's final orders may be overturned by a court for a variety of reasons, including legal error, abuse of discretion, or lack of substantial evidence. Option C is also incorrect because the ALJ's final order is not retried in a federal district court, but rather reviewed on appeal by a higher court. Finally, option D is also incorrect because the final order of an ALJ can be reviewed by courts.
learn more about ALJ here
https://brainly.com/question/31535334
#SPJ11
In an environmental law context, ________ has been considered where crop dusting contaminated adjacent properties, toxic chemicals were improperly disposed of, and oil contaminated a nearby water well.
A) negligence per se
B) private nuisance
C) strict liability
D) public nuisance
In an environmental law context, C) strict liability has been considered where crop dusting contaminated adjacent properties, toxic chemicals were improperly disposed of, and oil contaminated a nearby water well.
Strict liability is a legal principle that holds a party responsible for damages or harm caused by their actions, regardless of fault or intent. In environmental law, strict liability is often applied to cases involving pollution or environmental damage. It means that a person or entity can be held liable for the consequences of their actions, even if they took reasonable precautions or did not act negligently.
In the given scenario, where crop dusting led to contamination, improper disposal of toxic chemicals occurred, and oil contaminated a water well, strict liability would be applicable. This principle ensures that those engaged in activities with potential environmental impacts are held accountable for any harm caused and provides a means of seeking compensation for the affected parties.
To learn more about Strict Liability, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30830242
#SPJ11
In an environmental law context, C) strict liability has been considered where crop dusting contaminated adjacent properties, toxic chemicals were improperly disposed of, and oil contaminated a nearby water well.
Strict liability is a legal principle that holds a party responsible for damages or harm caused by their actions, regardless of fault or intent. In environmental law, strict liability is often applied to cases involving pollution or environmental damage. It means that a person or entity can be held liable for the consequences of their actions, even if they took reasonable precautions or did not act negligently.
In the given scenario, where crop dusting led to contamination, improper disposal of toxic chemicals occurred, and oil contaminated a water well, strict liability would be applicable. This principle ensures that those engaged in activities with potential environmental impacts are held accountable for any harm caused and provides a means of seeking compensation for the affected parties.
To learn more about Strict Liability, click here:
brainly.com/question/30830242
#SPJ11
Analyze three examples of the the kinds of writing done in the
legal field.
In the legal field, there are many types of writing that lawyers, judges, and legal professionals use to communicate important information. Three examples of the kinds of writing done in the legal field are: Legal Briefs, Contracts, Legal Opinions.
A legal brief is a written document that presents the arguments and legal reasoning for a case. It is typically written by an attorney and submitted to a court before a hearing or trial. Legal briefs are often highly structured and contain specific sections that address the legal issues involved in the case. They are used to persuade the court to rule in favor of the party who is submitting the brief.
Contracts can be simple or complex, depending on the nature of the agreement. They are often written in highly technical language and require a thorough understanding of legal terminology. Legal opinions are written by judges and other legal professionals to explain their reasoning and interpretation of the law. They are used to provide guidance to other judges, attorneys, and legal professionals.
Learn more about terminology
https://brainly.com/question/28266225
#SPJ11
which statement regarding the appellate jurisdiction of the intermediate and highest level texas appellate courts is incorrect?
A. All cases involving money disputes can be appealed.
B. Justice of the peace court
C. The people can vote on the appointed judge after he or she serves in office for a whil
The statement that is incorrect regarding the appellate jurisdiction of the intermediate and highest level Texas appellate courts is A) All cases involving money disputes can be appealed.
The appellate jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and review decisions made by a lower court. The appellate court generally only reviews issues of law, not fact. The function of the appellate court is to correct legal errors made by a lower court.
The following are the intermediate and highest-level Texas appellate courts:Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA): It is the state's highest court in criminal cases. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all criminal cases. It is made up of nine judges who are elected statewide to six-year terms.Texas Supreme Court: It is the highest state court for civil cases. It has the ultimate appellate jurisdiction over civil matters.
It is made up of nine justices who are elected statewide to six-year terms. Texas Courts of Appeals: They are the state's intermediate appellate courts. The state is divided into 14 courts of appeals districts, with a varying number of justices in each district. Their principal function is to hear appeals from trial courts in the districts. They generally hear both civil and criminal appeals. They do not hear cases from county courts-at-law or justice of the peace courts.
Therefore, the statement that is incorrect regarding the appellate jurisdiction of the intermediate and highest-level Texas appellate courts is "All cases involving money disputes can be appealed."
To know more about money, visit:
brainly.com/question/32960490
#SPJ11
This bracelet CONSTRICTS my arm. CONSTRICTS also mean:relievespainssqueezesprevents
Constricts also means squeezes.
The other words do not fit the proper meaning, and squeezes best fits the context in this sentence.
I hope this helps! :)
briefly explain the procedure that must be followed when passing legislation
Answer:
Step 1: The bill is drafted.
Step 2: The bill is introduced.
Step 3: The bill goes to committee.
Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill.
Step 5: Committee mark up of the bill.
Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill.
Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber.
Step 8: The bill goes to the president.
Step 9: Overriding a veto.
The bill has been written, The bill is introduced in step two, The bill is referred to committee, The bill is examined by the subcommittee, The measure is marked up in committee, The full chamber will vote on the bill in step six, Referring the bill to the opposite chamber is step seven, The bill is sent to the president in step eight and Getting around a veto are the procedure that must be followed when passing legislation.
What is passing legislation?For a piece of legislation to pass and be delivered to the president for signature, it must receive a majority vote in both the House and the Senate.
A bill that the president has vetoed may be overridden by passing it once more in each chamber with at least two-thirds of the members present voting in favour.
Thus, the process has written above.
For more details about passing legislation, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28266358
#SPJ2
The claim (in law) that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case that it should be settled in the same way
The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."
What is the precedent claim?Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.
When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.
Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Which of the following is an example of subordinate
legislation?
Select one:
a. Bills
b. Statues
c. Common law
d. Regulations
Regulations is an example of subordinate legislation. The correct option is d.
Subordinate legislation includes things like regulations. Laws or regulations that are made by organizations or authorities with the authority granted by primary legislation, such as a Parliamentary Act are referred to as subordinate legislation. To implement and enforce the more general principles and provisions of primary legislation, regulations provide specific rules, specifications and processes.
They act as a way to address particular issues, offer direction, and guarantee adherence to the general legal framework. Regulations are usually made by administrative bodies, government agencies or other delegated authorities, and they are enforceable within their particular sphere of influence. They are essential in defining the practical application of laws, bridging any gaps, and adjusting to changing conditions while staying within the purview of the primary legislation.
Learn more about administrative bodies at:
brainly.com/question/31821398
#SPJ4
Each state's medical practice acts define unprofessional conduct for medical professionals. Which of the following is an example of this misconduct? A. Failing to meet continuing education requirements B. Charging fees that are too low C. Refusing to treat a patient based on their race or religion D. Providing free medical care to uninsured patients
The medical practice acts are state laws that regulate the practice of medicine in the United States. These laws aim to protect the public from unprofessional conduct by medical professionals.
Unprofessional conduct is any behavior that violates the ethical standards of the medical profession or puts patients at risk of harm. The medical practice acts define various types of unprofessional conduct, and failing to meet continuing education requirements, charging fees that are too low, refusing to treat a patient based on their race or religion, and providing free medical care to uninsured patients are all examples of this misconduct. Of these options, refusing to treat a patient based on their race or religion is the most serious form of unprofessional conduct. It violates the principles of medical ethics and human rights and could lead to legal action against the physician. On the other hand, providing free medical care to uninsured patients is not considered unprofessional conduct in most states. However, it is important for physicians to follow the guidelines set by their state medical board and to maintain high ethical standards in their practice.
To know more about physician visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32272415
#SPJ11