Answer:
Every state has a Legislative body like congress that is responsible for passing laws that apply to the particular state.
Answer:
Congress is the legislative branch out the other 2 Branches and makes laws for the country . Congress has two legislative bodies: the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives. Anyone elected to any body can make a new law. A bill is a ( in progress of becoming a law) making for a new law.
Explanation:
Hopefully this helps you
pls mark brainlest
what reasoning should jamal provide for why this car insurance claim was denied?
The reason Jamal should provide for why this car insurance claim was denied, is because the claim exceeded the cover limit.
Insurance claims are denied if there is a dispute as to fault or liability. Companies will only agree to pay you if there's clear evidence to show that their policyholder is to blame for your injuries.
Insurance mean in plain English?Insurance, known as insurance coverage or insurance policy, is a thing between the insurer and the insured. For damages that the insured may have in certain situations, the insurer offers financial protection.
What serves as its justification?Its objective is to less financial uncertainty and minimize accidental loss. In exchange for assuming the risk of a substantial loss and a guarantee to pay in the case of one, it achieves this by paying a small, predictable fee—an insurance premium—to a reputable insurer.
To know more about Insurance visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27822778
#SPJ1
if i had 2 cookies and a bully guy (lets name him bob) stole 1 cookie and already had 10 cookies and i left school that day with a big bag and 12 cookies what happend
Organized interest groups apply pressure to the government in several ways EXCEPT for which ONE of the following?
Select one:
a.
Lobbying government officials
b.
The use of propaganda
c.
Running candidates for office to change public policy
d.
Contributing to candidates that support their cause
Answer:
Lobbying. When a representative of an interest group tries to influence the government by communicating with those in government.Litigation. Lawsuits.Mobilizing public opinion. Institutional advertising, protests and demonstrations, and grassroot mobilizations.Using electoral politics
Explanation:
I NEED HELP WITH THIS ASAP PLEASE!!!
What do you think of our progressive tax plan at the federal level? If you had to change it, how would you
change it? Why would you make those changes?
Answer: The in general government assess framework is progressive, with add up to government assess burdens a bigger rate of salary for higher-income family units than for lower-income family units. A few government charges are backward, as they make up a bigger rate of wage for lower-income than for higher-income families.
Source: taxpolicycenter.org
An assault victim describes the attacker as “a bearded, 25-year-old black man, light-skinned, wearing a white shirt.”
When the police bring the victim in for a lineup, one man has facial hair and wears a white shirt.
All of the fillers wear dark shirts. None have facial hair, and several have very dark skin.
If the victim chooses the bearded man in a white shirt, should this identification hold up in court? Explain your reasoning.
(Hint: Apply what is happening with the fillers in your response. Look carefully at the witness description. If you need help, revisit the Pretrial Eyewitness Identification course page.)
The white shirt doesn't necessarily mean anything, but if he is also a bearded 25-year-old light-skinned black man, then the identification by the assault victim is valid in the court.
Assault victims are people who have been physically or sexually abused by another person. This can include people who have been raped, beaten, or otherwise harmed by someone else. Witness suffer from physical injuries, emotional trauma, or both. They may have difficulty trusting people, and may feel scared or helpless.
They may have injuries that need medical attention. It is important for assault victims to get help from a doctor or nurse as soon as possible. In court it is important to remember that assault victims are not to blame for what happened .
To know more about Assault victim, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/9824812
#SPJ1
The power to decide if cases are allowed by the Constitution is called:
O Impeachment
O Judicial Review
O Federalism
O Filibuster
What constitutional amendment gives you the right to an attorney?
Third
Fifth
First
O Sixth
Answer:
The Sixth Amendment
Explanation:
The Sixth Amendment sets up the Criminal Justice System basically; The right to a lawyer, a Impartial jury, a Speedy trial, and the right to know the nature of your charges, and you're accusers.
state five ways through which political party can be funded
Answer:
Explanation:
Public funds, extortion, political fund raising, government funds, embezzembezzlement, or having a independently wealthy political leader.
how to maintain the social order in society?
this is for my paragraph
Answer:
There are several ways to maintain social order in society:
Establishing laws and enforcing them: Having clear laws that are enforced by a legal system helps to establish rules for behavior in society and promotes order.
Promoting social norms and values: Teaching and promoting values such as respect, honesty, and responsibility can help to create a sense of shared purpose and encourage people to behave in ways that contribute to social order.
Encouraging positive interpersonal relationships: Building strong, positive relationships within a community can foster a sense of belonging and create a sense of obligation to behave in ways that contribute to social order.
Providing social support and resources: Ensuring that people have access to resources such as education, healthcare, and employment can help to reduce social tensions and promote stability.
Maintaining effective communication and dialogue: Having open lines of communication and encouraging dialogue can help to resolve conflicts and promote understanding and cooperation among different groups in society.
Explanation:
Speaker of the house definition in your own words?
Hello
I hope you and your family are doing well!
The Speaker of the House is the leader of the House of Representatives, a legislative chamber in the United States Congress. The Speaker of the House is responsible for managing the day-to-day business of the House and ensuring that the rules and procedures of the chamber are followed. The Speaker is elected by the members of the House and serves as a key leader in the legislative process. In this role, the Speaker has significant influence over the agenda of the House and works closely with the Majority Leader to set the legislative schedule. The Speaker also represents the House in its interactions with other branches of government and serves as a spokesperson for the chamber.
----
Please consider rating this answer 5 stars and brainliest if you find it helpful.
Happy Holidays!
If you were interested in being part of an emergency crew with knowledge and practice in the fundamentals of
emergency medical care, to which area would you apply?
OEMT-B
paramedic
EMT-1/99
ambulance driver
OEMT-B
Explanation:
from the word paramedic l conclude that OEMT-B is a field where you may apply the skills you've learn and you can develop your knowledge too
Think about an issue in your neighborhood where your intervention can help bring justice to people. (India class 8 Judiciary)
The belief that everyone deserves equal economic, political, and social rights and opportunities is referred to as social justice.
What is one way you can promote social justice in your community?Contribute your time or money to charitable organizations. There are many nonprofit and local organizations in your city or town that provide art-based services to disenfranchised people, such as underserved schools, homeless communities, and women's and children's centers.
Familiarize yourself with social justice issues in your community by reading local newspapers, watching the local news, and keeping up with other relevant sources. You can also write or call your elected officials about these issues.
Learn more about social justice here:
https://brainly.com/question/14573733
#SPJ9
What is the author’s position of These 3 Common Arguments For Preserving the Electoral College Are Wrong from TIME Magazine?
Electoral college has long been criticized for its unfairness and tendency to be biased.
The author's position about three common arguments for Preserving the Electoral College that is wrong are-
1. Voters' passions are filtered by electors-
When initially learning about the Electoral College, college students frequently defend the system by pointing out that it was designed to act as a check on the electorate in case it made a bad presidential choice.
Nevertheless, voters no longer serve as either autonomous agents or representatives of the state legislature. They are chosen based on their fidelity to the party by party leaders or conventions.
2. Rural areas would get ignored-
Since 2000, a common justification for the electoral college on conservative blogs and talk radio has been that without it, politicians would spend all of their time campaigning in large cities and would disregard low-population areas.
The argument is untrue aside from this peculiar perspective on democracy that favors spending as much effort on campaigns in communities with few residents as it does in communities where the majority of Americans reside.
3. It creates a mandate to lead-
Because of the winner-take-all character of the Electoral College at the state level, some have argued that it should be kept in place.
This is because many close elections are perceived by the public and media as landslides, providing the victorious candidate a stronger mandate to rule.
Ronald Reagan received 51 percent of the national popular vote but 91 percent of the electoral votes in 1980, providing the appearance of a landslide victory and enabling him to persuade Congress to support some of his policies.
To know more about Electoral College visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25375266
#SPJ1
please mention at least 20 fundamental human rights in the constitution
Answer:
The fundamental human rights contained in the constitution of Nigeria are: the Right to Life, the Right to Dignity of Human Person, the Right to Personal Liberty, the Right to Fair Hearing, the Right to Private and Family Life, the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion, the Right to Freedom of Expression.
After standing trial for multiple muggings, Zeke is given a jail sentence of two years in prison. The judge says that Zeke is a menace to the public,
and it is his duty to make sure that the public is kept safe from Zeke's future actions. What goal of law enforcement does the judge's reason cover?
О А.
general deterrence
OB. incapacitation
OC. punishment
OD. rehabilitation
The goal of law enforcement that the judge's reason covers is: B. incapacitation.
What is the goal of law of incapacitation ?The primary purpose of law enforcement is to incapacitate criminals by detaching them from society through imprisonment or some other type of confinement.
When a judge declares that Zeke poses a threat to the public and should be isolated, it indicates that the goal of his punishment is his incapacitation, not retribution, reform, or deterrence against comparable crimes committed by others.
Find out more on incapacitation at https://brainly.com/question/2403183
#SPJ1
Drag each tile to the correct box.
What is the correct sequence of steps in the WTO procedure for settling global trade disputes?
compensation
->>
implementation
->>
retaliation
consultation
The WTO dispute resolution process consists of three main phases: i) discussions among the parties; (ii) decisions made by panels and, if necessary, the Appellate Body; and (iii) the way the ruling is put into action.
What is the WTO's mechanism for resolving disputes?Negotiations are the ideal method for resolving disputes. WTO members can request the establishment of a panel to settle the dispute if this is not possible. The panel will issue a report that can be challenged on legal grounds in the WTO's Appellate Body.
What are the steps involved in resolving a dispute?The procedures consist of three major steps: 1) the appellant's submission in writing; ( 2) the appellee and third participant, respectively, submitted written arguments; and, thirdly, an oral hearing of the Appellate Body and the parties.
To learn more about WTO's Appellate Body here:
https://brainly.com/question/30199694
#SPJ1
Question 1 of 10
Which of the following is the best reason a contract might be oral instead of
in writing?
O A. There is a desire to protect both parties of the agreement from
fraud.
B. The law or a statute prohibits the agreement from being in writing.
C. It is the fastest, most reliable way to capture all the terms of an
agreement.
D. The terms of the agreement are simple and will be quickly fulfilled.
SUBMIT
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Answer:
D. The terms of the agreement are simple and will be quickly fulfilled.
Explanation:
While not the most reliable and safest option for a contract, an oral agreement is simple and quick.
The fine for a first time littering ticket is
up to:
$250
Suppose a lawyer exhibited a small section of a tire imprint during a trial. Why would the opposing lawyer want to see the tire impression of the entire tire and not just the one section?
The opposing lawyer want to see the tire impression of the entire tire and not just the one section because when impressions are collected it is possible that identifications can be made linking a suspect or vehicle to the crime.
Tire track imprints are regarded as pattern evidence since they leave behind a distinct pattern. Tire tracks can assist narrow down the brand, style, and size in the same way that shoe impressions do.
These imprints or impressions can be compared to a suspect's shoe or a vehicle's tire to ascertain if the shoe or tyre that left the impression is the same one that left the imprint. As shoes and tyres are worn, their physical characteristics alter. This is known as wear, and it is frequently represented in the imprint or pattern left behind.
To learn more on tire impression here:
https://brainly.com/question/21230945
#SPJ1
Please describe a scenario that provides an argument for the explanation of criminal behavior in American Society.
You must pick a specific crime (personal or property) and list the factors which contributed to an individual's behavior. In
your explanation, utilize the elements for the theoretical components of Classical (Free will) vs. the Positivist School
(Biological Determinism and the Somatotype School) in Criminology.
Feel free to use your imagination of the crime, but be attentive to address the elements which support your choice of
Biology (DNA) over Environment (Sociological, Psychological, or Physiological (Body or Brain trauma)factors as listed
above. (Remember to use the media presentations and your text as references prior to submitting your response!)
This is a bit of a long one sooo get ready for the ride
Hope this helps a bit
Answer:
Crime: Aggravated assault
Scenario: John, a 25-year-old man, was arrested and charged with aggravated assault after he attacked a stranger in a park. The victim suffered from several injuries, including a broken nose and a concussion. John has no prior criminal history and is currently unemployed.
Classical (Free will) theory: According to the classical theory of criminology, criminal behavior is a result of individuals making a rational choice to commit a crime. In John's case, his decision to assault the stranger in the park can be attributed to his own free will. Perhaps he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or he may have felt provoked or threatened by the victim. However, according to this theory, John is ultimately responsible for his own actions.
Positivist (Biological determinism) theory: The positivist theory of criminology posits that criminal behavior is influenced by biological, psychological, or social factors. One example of a biological factor is genetics. Studies have shown that there may be a genetic component to aggressive behavior, which could contribute to John's assault of the stranger. Additionally, brain injuries and other physical traumas have also been linked to violent behavior. In John's case, it is possible that he may have suffered from a brain injury or other physical condition that contributed to his violent outburst.
Somatotype (Body type) theory: The somatotype theory of criminology suggests that individuals with certain body types are more prone to criminal behavior. For example, individuals with a mesomorphic body type (muscular and athletic) are more likely to engage in violent or aggressive behavior. In John's case, it is possible that he has a mesomorphic body type, which may have contributed to his physical strength and ability to inflict harm on the victim.
References:
"Criminology: The Essentials" by Anthony Walsh and Cody Jorgensen (2018)
"The Genetic Basis of Aggressive Behavior: An Overview" by Laura Almasy and John Blangero (2001)
"Physical Trauma and Crime" by Mark S. Umbreit and Carolyn Boyes-Watson (2006)
"The Somatotype Theory of Sheldon" by Kevin M. Beaver and J.C. Barnes (2013)
"Brain Trauma and Violent Behavior" by H.S. Levin and A.R. Dronkers (1993)
"Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime: A Correlation Analysis" by Lindsey R. Blumell and Bruce C. Smith (2014)
a.
40. Which describes equality in a democracy?
equal ability
b. equal opportunity
C.
equal income
d. equal living conditions
B. Equal Opportunity
Explanation:Because every citizen of any democratic country has the right to choose their own government. Hope it help youDefine state capture?
What is state capture ?
Answer:
State capture can be defined as the systemic political corruption in which privates interests significantly influence a states decision making processes to their advantage.
State capture refers to a situation where private individuals, typically influential or wealthy, exert undue influence over the state apparatus, including its institutions, policies, and decision-making processes, to advance their own interests at the expense of the broader public interest.
State capture is a form of systemic corruption that undermines democratic governance, the rule of law, and equitable development. In a state capture scenario, powerful individuals or entities manipulate the state's key institutions, such as the executive, legislature, judiciary, regulatory bodies, and law enforcement agencies, to serve their personal or corporate interests.
They may do so through various means, including bribery, blackmail, patronage, or other illicit practices. This manipulation can result in the subversion of the democratic process, erosion of public trust, and diversion of public resources for private gain.
State capture often involves collusive relationships between politicians, government officials, and business interests. These relationships can result in policy decisions that favor specific individuals or corporations, monopolistic practices, unfair awarding of contracts, preferential access to resources, and the protection of illicit activities. It can lead to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, perpetuating inequality, stifling competition, and hindering economic development.
The consequences of state capture are far-reaching. It undermines the principles of accountability, transparency, and fairness in governance, and erodes public confidence in democratic institutions. It can impede effective policymaking, hinder social progress, and exacerbate corruption. Combatting state capture requires strong and independent institutions, robust checks and balances, a free press, and an engaged civil society. International cooperation and anti-corruption measures are also crucial in addressing this complex challenge and safeguarding the integrity of the state.
For more such questions on State capture
https://brainly.com/question/26827624
#SPJ11
Identify judicial processes from pretrial to appeal
Judicial processes can vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal system, but in general, they include the following stages: Pretrial,Trial,Verdict,Sentencing,Appeals,Post-appeal
1. Pretrial: This is the stage before a trial begins and includes activities such as investigation, arrest, booking, and bail hearings. During this stage, the prosecution and defense gather evidence and build their cases.
2. Trial: This is the stage where the case is presented to a judge or jury. Witnesses are called, evidence is presented, and arguments are made by the prosecution and defense.
3. Verdict: Once the trial is over, the judge or jury delivers a verdict of guilty or not guilty. If the defendant is found guilty, the judge will typically schedule a sentencing hearing.
4. Sentencing: During this stage, the judge determines the appropriate punishment for the defendant based on the severity of the crime and any aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
5. Appeals: If the defendant is found guilty, they may have the right to appeal the verdict to a higher court. The appeals court will review the case to determine if any legal errors were made during the trial that may have affected the outcome.
6. Post-appeal: If the defendant is unsuccessful in their appeal, they may have limited options to challenge the ruling, such as filing a habeas corpus petition or seeking executive clemency.
These stages of the judicial process can involve numerous legal procedures, rules, and requirements that are designed to ensure that justice is served in a fair and impartial manner.
For more such questions on jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ11
Here is an excerpt from a recent news story from the New York Times: Use this for both this question and the one that follows.
"A federal appeals panel on Thursday unanimously rejected President Trump’s bid to reinstate his ban on travel into the United States from seven largely Muslim nations, a sweeping rebuke of the administration’s claim that the courts have no role as a check on the president.
The three-judge panel, suggesting that the ban did not advance national security, said the administration had shown “no evidence” that anyone from the seven nations — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — had committed terrorist acts in the United States.
The ruling also rejected Mr. Trump’s claim that courts are powerless to review a president’s national security assessments. Judges have a crucial role to play in a constitutional democracy, the court said."
Which option correctly describes the type of check and balance that is reflected in the passage above?
A ) The judicial branch is checking the legislative branch.
B ) The executive branch is checking the judicial branch.
C ) The judicial branch is checking the executive branch.
D ) The legislative branch is checking the executive branch.
The form of check and balance that is portrayed is the judicial branch monitoring the executive branch.
What checks and balances are provided by the executive branch?A statute may be vetoed by the President in the executive branch, but the legislative branch may overturn the veto with a majority of votes. The legislative branch has the authority to impeach and remove the president, approve presidential appointees, and monitor the budget.
What does "system of check and balance" mean?The concept of checks and balances mandates that different branches of government share power and have the ability to veto other branches' actions. Checks and balances are often only utilised by constitutional governments.
To know more about judicial branch visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30704871
#SPJ1
Which chamber will support your
compromise the most? Would they both agree?
Explain your answer
A BAL of .12 reduces the distance a pedestrian can be seen by
a driver by about.
15%
10%
20%
5%
A BAL of .12 reduces the distance a pedestrian can be seen by a driver by about C. 20%
How does the BAL reduce the chances?This is because alcohol impairs a driver's ability to focus and react quickly, which can make it difficult to see and avoid pedestrians. In many cases, this is enough to make the visibility distance much less than the stopping distance, which can lead to a crash.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that alcohol driving is a factor in one-third of all traffic fatalities in the United States. In 2019, there were 10,142 people killed in alcohol-driving crashes.
Find out more on BLA at https://brainly.com/question/2231540
#SPJ1
Why is Miranda v. Arizona different from MOST Landmark decisions?
Answer:
Arizona 1966 gave rise to the Miranda warning, now issued upon a rest after the court ruled 5 to 4 that suspects must be informed of their rights before their question, these rights include the 5th amendment right against self incrimination and the 6th amendment right to an attorney
Create an argument for AND against making public order crimes legal. Include what you think the impact would be in both arguments.
why does the US constitution include a Bill of Rights
the bill of rights was created because the anti-federalists were concerned that
Answer:
true
Explanation: