Judicial activism is a kind of judicial decision-making that acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent.
A judicial theory known as judicial activism maintains that the courts can and should consider wider societal ramifications of their judgements in addition to the relevant law. It's occasionally used as the opposite of judicial restraint.
The phrase typically means that judges deviate from precedent and rely their decisions more on personal convictions. Political controversies surround the concept of judicial activism as well as specific activist judgements.
Judiciary interpretation, statutory interpretation, and the separation of powers are all issues that are directly tied to the matter of judicial activism.
To know more about questions related with 'judicial activism'
visit- https://brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
When parking near a curb while facing uphill, you should turn your (front) wheels _____.
When parking near a curb while facing uphill and there is a curb, you should turn your front wheels away from the curb and towards the road. This is because it will help prevent the car from rolling back down the hill.
The correct answer is away from the curb and towards the road.
Turning your wheels this way creates a wedge that will prevent your car from rolling back down the hill if the brakes fail. If the car starts to roll, the curb will stop the rear wheels from rolling, while the front wheels will roll away from the curb and towards the road.
The angled wheels will help the car to move away from the curb, giving it enough space to turn and correct itself, thus preventing the car from rolling back down the hill. It's also essential to engage the handbrake when parking on a hill, regardless of whether your wheels are turned.
To learn more about uphill, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30236255
#SPJ4
Where is the majority of a city budget spending?
State and local governments spend most of their resources on education, health, and social service programs. In 2019, about one-third of state and local spending went toward combined elementary and secondary education (22%) and higher education (9%).
The advantages and disadvantages of the public budget
Answer:
DISADVANTAGES:-Rigid decision makingTime required.Gaming the system.Blame for outcomes.Expense allocations.Use it or lose it.Only considers financial outcomes.ADVANTAGES:-Profitability review.Assumptions review.Performance evaluations.Funding planning.Bottleneck analysisPlanning orientation.Who establishes a crime scene?
a) a criminal investigator
b) crime scene photographer
c) district attorney
d) first responder
In 2009 one person died every blank minutes from impaired driving in the United States
Answer:
Every 48 minutes
Explanation:
Neal, a twelve-year-old, buys a pair of skis from Outdoor Outfitters (OO), telling the salesperson that he has never been skiing but “really wants to do it.” The salesperson urges Neal to take a lesson in the sport before attempting a run, but Neal ignores the advice. On the first run, Neal loses control, hits a tree, and is injured. Neal files a suit against OO, alleging that it was negligent to have sold the skis to him, when he was clearly too young and inexperienced.
Issue: How might OO defend itself? Define, explain and decide
Answer:
OO could use the defense that they gave advice but it was rather the action of the boy that caused the accident not the other way around.
Explanation:
The Outdoor Outfitters' defend is that a salesperson warned Neal, a 12-year-old child, that he needed to take a lesson before participating in the run, but the child did not listen to the salesman and was hurt in the run.
What is defend?These advantages simply add to the case for learning self-defense. Of course, there are more substantial benefits than merely increased self-esteem. Training teaches you how to defend yourself and others. Communities will battle to defend themselves.
The case and lawsuit are based on the strict liability tort, which the Outdoor Outfitters salesman failed to perform, despite the fact that there was no fault in the product, but the boy was only 12 years old and had never tried or received proper instruction in this sport of skies, and the saleswoman sold him that product and allowed him to participate in a run.
As a result, the Outdoor Outfitters' defend is that a salesperson warned Neal, a 12-year-old child.
Learn more about on defend, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14167307
#SPJ2
1. Compare and contrast the structures, powers, and functions of both houses of Congress and explain how this impacts
the policy-making process.
Answer:
The United States Congress consists of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Here are some key differences between the two houses:
1. **Structure:** The House of Representatives has 435 voting members, each representing a congressional district in their state, with the number of representatives per state based on its population. The Senate, on the other hand, has 100 voting members, with two senators from each state.
2. **Powers:** The House of Representatives has the power to initiate revenue bills, impeach federal officials, and elect the President in the event of an Electoral College tie. The Senate has the power to approve treaties, confirm presidential nominations for federal positions, and hold impeachment trials.
3. **Functions:** Both houses of Congress have the power to pass laws, but the process is different for each. The House of Representatives typically initiates legislation, which must then be passed by the Senate before it can be sent to the President for approval or veto. The Senate has the power to propose amendments to legislation passed by the House, and the two houses must reconcile any differences between their versions of the bill before it can become law.
The differences in structure, powers, and functions of the two houses of Congress can impact the policy-making process in several ways:
1. **Representation:** The House of Representatives is designed to be more representative of the people, with representatives elected directly by the people in their districts. This means that the House may be more responsive to the needs and desires of the people than the Senate, which is composed of two senators per state regardless of population.
2. **Checks and balances:** The different powers held by each house of Congress provide a system of checks and balances that helps to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. For example, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach federal officials, while the Senate has the power to hold impeachment trials.
3. **Gridlock:** The different processes for passing legislation in each house of Congress can sometimes lead to gridlock and slow down the policy-making process. For example, if the House and Senate cannot agree on a version of a bill, it may not be able to become law.
In summary, the structure, powers, and functions of the two houses of Congress can impact the policy-making process in significant ways. The different representation, powers, and processes of each house can provide checks and balances, prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful, and help ensure that legislation represents the interests of the people. However, the differences can also lead to gridlock and slow down the policy-making process.
A growing number of law enforcement dispatchers and officers on the street believe that the 10-code system has outlived its usefulness. Compose a convincing argument that either supports this contention and offers an alternative form of communication shorthand that appropriately addresses contemporary calls for law enforcement response, or argue that the 10-code remains viable and useful in police communication but would benefit from some modernization; also provide examples of how you would modernize the code. You should answer this question using a minimum of 300 words.
Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code
Explanation:
I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad answer lol
New York's SHIELD Act. New York recently passed the SHIELD Act, a law that states that if you do business online from anywhere in the world, and you are a customer that lives in the state of New York, your business comes under the laws of the state of New York. (See the Tripwire article linked below.) Do you think a state should be able to extend its jurisdiction worldwide like this? Do you think businesses will start to refuse service online for customers who live in states with overreaching cyber laws? Or, do you think businesses will adjust and learn to cope with 50 different sets of state laws in cyber? Do you think the framers of our Constitution gave us a set of laws flexible enough to handle these kinds of situations? How is this different from the California Consumer Privacy Act? Compare and contrast these two laws. New York Passes a Law that Further Expands Cyber Protection (tripwire.com) California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) | State of California - Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General
The SHIELD Act passed in New York allows the state to extend its jurisdiction worldwide for businesses conducting online activities with New York customers.
The SHIELD Act gives New York the power to exercise global jurisdiction over companies that conduct internet business with residents of New York. There is disagreement over whether a state should have such broad global authority. To avoid the complications of compliance, some organizations may decide to reject service to customers in jurisdictions with stringent cyber laws. However, some organizations might decide to modify their procedures and adjust to the various cyber regulations of other states.
The Constitution's creators did offer a legal framework that permits adaptability and flexibility to changing circumstances. To successfully handle the problems created by international online transactions and data privacy, however, existing rules may need to be substantially refined given the quick growth of cyber-related issues.
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), in contrast to the SHIELD Act, places more of an emphasis on privacy protection. According to the CCPA, people of California have certain rights regarding their personal information. These rights include the right to access and correct their personal information, the right to know what data is collected and how it is used, and the right to refuse to have their data sold.
The SHIELD Act, on the other hand, imposes notification requirements in the event of data breaches and requires organizations to implement appropriate protections for the security of personal information. Although both laws deal with internet privacy, their methods and purviews are different.
To know more about SHIELD Act here https://brainly.com/question/29645014
#SPJ4
You are an off-duty officer who has just completed a three-mile run. You decide to cool off and rest under a big oak tree. You sit down under the tree and see a brown wallet close by. Curiosity gets the best of you, and you open the waller. Interestingly enough, you find credit cards, identification, and $300 in cash. Nobody else is around. What would you do? Using the post tab above, answer the question (minimum of 100 words)
Answer:
If I were an off-duty police officer and found a wallet with money, credit cards and personal documentation from a third party, without a doubt I would proceed to return said wallet with all its contents to its rightful owner. Thus, I would use my position as a law enforcement officer to track down said person and, once located, I would return their belongings.
I would do this for two reasons: first, because I consider that it is ethically and morally correct, since I do not own any of the belongings of the person who lost the wallet; and on the other hand, as a police officer I know the law and I know that appropriating something that does not belong to me can become a violation of the law.
Hello! I just saw your commercial on tv for the first time. I would like to find out more information about your company and how we may be able to collaborate and bring an additional layer of education to your law studies platform. I look forward to hearing back from you.
what does this mean?
The supreme court on monday rejected an appeal seeking to give american citizenship to people born in which territory?.
The Supreme Court ruled that he had been unfairly picked out by the police due to his race.Chinese immigrant Lee Yick conducted a laundry business out of a wooden structure in California.
A legislation that was in effect at the time (the end of the 19th century) stated that this type of business could not be operated in a wooden structure without a specific licence. The majority of the laundry facilities were owned by Chinese immigrants, yet this permit was not obtained for them.The Nationality Acts of 1790 and 1870, which stipulate that in order to qualify for US citizenship, a person must either be “white” or a “native American,” were the legal bases on which the US Supreme Court denied US citizenship to Japanese nationals. According to the law of the soil, every person born within the boundaries or within the territories of the United States is immediately granted citizenship, regardless of their background or family history. The law of the soil also grants children the nationality of the country in which they were born, and this is recognized throughout almost all of the world.
To know more about citizenship visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3588983
#SPJ4
A criminal statute, which is so vague or indefinite, that the courts have felt they are considered to be "void for vagueness," because they are essentially:
If a criminal statute is so ambiguous or imprecise that it fails to provide people fair notice of what behaviour is prohibited, it is ruled "void for vagueness" by the courts and violates their right to due process.
it difficult for people to understand what conduct may lead to criminal liability. The principle of "void for vagueness" is a legal concept that addresses this issue.When a criminal statute is so poorly defined or lacks clarity to the extent that it fails to provide individuals with fair notice of what behavior is prohibited, it may be deemed "void for vagueness." This means that the law is considered unconstitutional and unenforceable because it violates the due process rights of individuals.
The principle of fair notice is an essential aspect of the legal system. Laws should be written in a way
lean more about ambiguous here :
https://brainly.com/question/31273453
#SPJ11
What was the outcome of the Casey Anthony case?
Casey was not found guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter of a kid. She WAS found guilty of 4 misdemeanor counts of providing false information to law enforcement though.
Hope this helps!!!! : D
How is a concurring opinion different from a dissenting opinion?
1. A concurring opinion explains why a justice disagrees with the majority decision, but abstains from ruling on the case, while a dissenting opinion describes the feelings of the majority.
2. A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
3. A concurring opinion asserts that two similar cases should be aligned and ruled on together, while a dissenting opinion insists that the case being heard is singular and unique.
4. A concurring opinion demands that all justices rule in the same way on a case, while a dissenting opinion explains the differing opinions of justices who ruled the same way on a case.
Answer:
2. A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
Explanation:
Answer:
what she said
Explanation:
Discrepancies related to drug crime sentencing? Discrepancies related to socioeconomic status?
In terms of drug crime sentencing, numerous studies reveal discrepancies in the manner that different races and ethnic backgrounds are warranted for such offenses.
How to explain it yet sentencingTo exemplify, Black and Hispanic persons conventionally obtain lengthier prison sentences compared to Whites for a similar drug charges, even when controlling other variables like criminal record and quantity involved. This predicament is frequently known as racial or ethnic variation in drug stipulations.
Moreover, disparities in drug offense severity moreover depend on the kind of drug implicated. For instance, defendants convicted of crack cocaine typically suffer much more stringent sentences than those associated with powder cocaine convictions, irrespective of the fact they have an identical pharmacology. This difference has been widely viewed as racism and economic prejudice since crack-related violations occur more likely amongst low-income earners and marginalized communities.
Learn more about crime on
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
An implied contract may result from statements found in employee handbooks or other employment documants.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
A contract is a signed agreement between an employer and an employee stating various ground rules as terms of employment. This is a signed and official documentation that holds both parties in an agreement.
An implied contract, on the other hand, is not a written or verbally spoken contract but is based on the actions of the parties involved. It is still legally binding and is a form of agreement between the concerned parties. And so, it can also be a result of any statements found in an employee's handbook or other employment documents.
Thus, the answer is true.
california condor re-introductions were carried out by a partnership between the usfws and the
California condor re-introductions were carried out by a partnership between the USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service) and the California Condor Recovery Program.
The partnership between the USFWS and the California Condor Recovery Program began in the 1980s as the California condor population had dramatically declined to a critically low number. The goal was to establish self-sustaining populations of the California condor in the wild through captive breeding and reintroduction efforts.
The USFWS provided funding, expertise, and regulatory authority to help manage the reintroduction program. The California Condor Recovery Program oversaw the captive breeding and reintroduction efforts, which involved releasing California condors into the wild in several locations in California, Arizona, and Baja California, Mexico.
The partnership between these two organizations has been crucial in the successful recovery of the California condor population, which has now grown from a low of 27 individuals in the 1980s to over 500 individuals today. The program continues to monitor and manage the California condor population to ensure their long-term survival.
Learn more about California Condor Recovery Program: https://brainly.com/question/22590944
#SPJ11
You are driving in a municipal area and have turned onto the entrance ramp for an expressway;
A: You should signal for merging only when you start to merge.
B: When you merge onto the expressway, you don't need to signal unless you see other traffic.
C: At the start of the ramp you should begin checking for an opening in traffic, and start signaling
for your turn.
One should follow all the road rule while driving, while turning to entrance ramp of an expressway on should at the start of the ramp check for opening in the traffic and start signaling for their turn.
What is good driving and bad driving?Good driving means being on alert while driving the vehicle and following all the road safety rules like: vision clarity while driving. Bad driving means the bad habits which need to be avoided while driving: don't drink and drive.
While driving in a municipal area and have turned onto the entrance ramp for an expressway the one should at the start of the ramp check for opening in the traffic and start signaling for their turn.
Therefore, it can be said that option C aptly describes the above statement.
Learn more about good driving and bad driving here:
https://brainly.com/question/14893886
Each seat in the legislature is _____, or divided, among the districts so that legislators represent the same number of people within a state.
Answer:
Apportioned.
Explanation:
A state legislature refers to the legislative body of each states of the federal government and are saddled with the responsibility of making or enacting laws. Thus, the state legislatures is one of the body of governance that has the power or authority to ratify (approve, confirm or give consent) a proposed amendment to the Constitution by getting three-quarter of the states to vote in support.
All states have a bicameral legislature which typically comprises of the upper chamber (Senate) and the lower chamber (House of Representatives).
Also, these states are divided into smaller segments known as districts, for accurate representation and election purposes.
Hence, each seat in the legislature is apportioned, or divided, among the districts so that legislators represent the same number of people within a state.
How soon after the conviction for driving while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs shall it be reported to the FAA and to which division should this be reported to?
Answer:
Within 60 days to the civil aviation security division
Explanation:
You have to report to the security and hazardous materials safety office which is under the civil aviation security division. Anybody that is holding any certificates under part 61 has to give a written report of every motor vehicle action that has to do with alcohol or drug-related, to the security personnel's in faa no later than 60 days after this action was done.
vacant land adjustments have to be made for differences in _
Vacant land adjustments have to be made for differences in size, location, and other factors.
When comparing vacant land parcels for valuation or appraisal purposes, it is essential to adjust for differences in various aspects. Some common factors that require adjustments include:
1. Size: Larger or smaller parcels of land may have different values per square foot or acre, so adjustments need to be made to ensure a fair comparison.
2. Location: The value of land can be heavily influenced by its location, such as proximity to amenities, access to transportation, and surrounding development patterns. Therefore, adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
3. Topography: The physical characteristics of the land, such as slope, soil type, and drainage, can impact its value and development potential. Adjustments may be necessary to account for these variations.
4. Zoning and land use restrictions: Different zoning regulations and land use restrictions can significantly impact the value of a parcel of land. Adjustments need to be made to account for these differences when comparing parcels.
5. Utilities and infrastructure: The availability of utilities (water, sewer, electricity, etc.) and access to infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.) can affect the value of vacant land. Adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
Vacant land adjustments are crucial in accurately assessing the value of land parcels for various purposes, such as real estate transactions or property taxes. These adjustments ensure a fair comparison between parcels by accounting for differences in size, location, and other factors.
For more information on Vacant land adjustments kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/14415858
#SPJ11
The Secret Service was assigned responsibility for protecting the president and his family following the assassination of which U.S. official?
a.President Abraham Lincoln
b.President John F. Kennedy
c.President William McKinley
d.President Ronal Reagan
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
All of the following would be true about Gerrymandering EXCEPT
a
A Provides an incumbent advantage
Builds public approval of Congress
Answer:
Builds public approval of congress
Answer:
MuRdEr?!??
Explanation:
today this the answer TVT I'm Proud of myself
One test for when government can ban speech because of its potential for harm is the
a. clear and present danger test
b. obvious and current harm test
c. contingent and imminent injury test
d. overt and contemporary peril test
The correct answer is a) clear and present danger test. The clear and present danger test is a test used by courts to determine when the government can restrict speech because of the potential harm it may cause.
The clear and present danger test was established by the Supreme Court in the case of Schenck v. United States (1919). This test is used to determine when speech can be restricted by the government because of its potential for harm.
Under this test, speech can only be restricted if it creates a clear and present danger of imminent harm. This means that the government must be able to prove that the speech in question presents a serious and immediate threat to public safety or national security.
The clear and present danger test has been used in a number of important First Amendment cases, including Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), in which the Supreme Court established a new standard for restrictions on speech that advocates illegal conduct.
to learn more about Schenck v. United States click here:
brainly.com/question/30563526
#SPJ11
TRUE/FALSE. springer nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The merger of Nature Publishing Group, Macmillan Education, and Springer Science+ Business Media resulted in the formation of Springer Nature Group in May 2015. BC Partners and Holtzbrinck Publishing Group are the two largest shareholders in Springer Nature.
Is the source Springer Nature trustworthy?One of the top global research, educational, and professional publishers, Springer Nature is home to a number of reputable and trusted companies that offer top-notch content through a variety of cutting-edge goods and services.
What distinguishes Springer from Springer Nature?The global publisher Springer Nature, which promotes and services the scientific community, includes Springer. By publishing sound and insightful research, fostering the growth of new fields of study, and facilitating global access to ideas and knowledge, Springer Nature seeks to advance discovery.
To Know more about Nature Group
https://brainly.com/question/28342135
#SPJ4
How does the exchange rate for a country's currency affect its terms of
trade?
A. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more
favorable terms of trade,
B. Favorable terms of trade are required for a country to trade wh
wealthy partners
C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to
deteriorating terms of trade,
D. Deteriorating terms of trade prevent a country from using its
currency for trade,
Answer:
A. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more
favorable terms of trade
Explanation:
Just got it right!
The exchange rate of a nation's currency affects the trading terms in such a way that the greater exchange rate leads to favorable trade between countries.
Option A is the correct answer.
What is meant by trading?Trading is the acquisition or disposal of goods or services by the countries with the outside countries.
The exchange rate is the rate that is used to convert the value of one currency into the value of the foreign currency. If the rate is higher, then the trading between the countries is more favorable whereas the trading becomes unfavorable if the rate is lower.
Therefore, the higher rate of exchange provides favorable trade which considers one of the effects of the exchange rate over trade.
Learn more about the exchange rate in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/13717814
#SPJ2
Where in the constitution are federal courts explicitly granted the power of judicial review?.
Answer:
just in surpreme court
Explanation:
My editable Data stolen by Jamie lech to steal my house and redo my taxes