Which king united the Anglo-Saxons in Britain to drive away the Viking invaders?

Answer:

A. Socialism

Explanation:

In history books, Karl Marx is always referred to a socialist. However, he is almost never referred to as a communist, capitalist, or a utilitarian.

Answer:

C: Justinian Code

Explanation:

I just did it on ed2020

Answer:

C: Justinian Code

Explanation:

Answer:                    

Explanation:

The Obama Administration pursued a trade deal with South Korea in 2012, known as the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement, as part of the Obama Administration’s goal to double exports.

The potential economic benefits were twofold: increased access to a large market and increased competitiveness in goods and services. The potential political benefits were an improved relationship between the United States and South Korea, which would further increase the economic relationship.

The potential costs included job losses for U.S. industries that could not compete with the cheaper goods and services produced by South Korea. Additionally, U.S. government subsidies would have to be provided to some U.S. industries that could not compete.

There is some evidence that the 2012 free trade deal between the United States and South Korea was a job killer, as President Trump has claimed. A 2019 Economic Policy Institute report found that the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement resulted in a net loss of 159,000 jobs, mostly in the manufacturing sector.

The Trump Administration's motivations in renegotiating the 2012 deal were twofold: to reduce the U.S. trade deficit and to open up South Korea's markets to more U.S. exports.

Additionally, the Trump Administration sought to renegotiate certain labor and environmental provisions of the original deal, as well as certain provisions related to automobile imports.

To know more about Free Trade Agreement click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/24572146#

#SPJ11

Answer: According to UNICEF, by the end of 2022, more than 17 million people—including 9.2 million children—lacked access to WASH facilities. That's more than half of the country's population. In addition, only one-third of the population is connected to a piped water network.

Explanation:

The term that is true about the case of Marbury v. Madison is that it is affirmed the principle of judicial review. Thus, option B is correct.

Judicial review is a kind of judicial process in which a judge examines the legality of a public body's decision or action. In other words, judicial reviews attack the process by which a judgment was made rather than the rightness or wrongness of the result reached.

Chief Justice John Marshall introduced the notion of judicial review in his judgment in Marbury v. Madison, an essential contribution to the system of "checks and balances" designed to prevent any one arm of the Federal Government from being too strong. Therefore, it can be concluded that option B is correct.

Learn more about  judicial review here:

https://brainly.com/question/966716

#SPJ2

The Ottoman system of devshirme helped to create merit-based opportunities in the military and administration as opposed to the hereditary system practiced in Europe at the time by recruiting young boys from conquered territories and training them for military or administrative positions.

This system allowed for individuals to rise through the ranks based on their abilities and performance, rather than simply their family connections or social status.

This created a more merit-based system, where those who were most qualified and capable were able to hold positions of power and influence.

In contrast, the hereditary system practiced in Europe at the time relied on family connections and social status to determine who held positions of power and influence.

This often led to individuals who were not qualified or capable holding positions of power simply because of their family connections or social status.

Overall, the Ottoman system of devshirme helped to create a more merit-based system that allowed for individuals to rise through the ranks based on their abilities and performance, rather than simply their family connections or social status.

To know more about Ottoman system  click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/12369957#

#SPJ11

Bacon's Rebellion played a significant role in the adoption and expansion of slavery in the southern colonies.

Bacon's Rebellion, which took place in Virginia in 1676, had far-reaching consequences for the institution of slavery in the southern colonies. The rebellion was a violent uprising led by Nathaniel Bacon, a disgruntled farmer, against the colonial government.

While the immediate causes of the rebellion were rooted in political and economic grievances, its aftermath had a profound impact on the status of enslaved Africans in the region.

One of the key outcomes of Bacon's Rebellion was the consolidation of power among the elite plantation owners. During the rebellion, both wealthy landowners and small farmers joined forces against the colonial government, revealing a potential alliance between different social classes. To prevent future uprisings, the ruling class sought to create a divide among the lower classes, particularly along racial lines.

They enacted laws and policies that further entrenched the institution of slavery, making it a permanent condition based on race. By exploiting racial divisions, the plantation owners effectively ensured that future rebellions would not have the same level of cross-class cooperation.

Furthermore, the rebellion prompted a shift in the labor system of the southern colonies. Prior to Bacon's Rebellion, many laborers in Virginia were indentured servants, including both Europeans and Africans. However, in the aftermath of the rebellion, there was a decline in the use of indentured servants and an increased reliance on enslaved Africans as a more controlled and permanent labor force.

Slave codes were enacted to restrict the rights and mobility of enslaved individuals, ensuring their status as property rather than temporary servants.

Bacon's Rebellion marked a turning point in the history of slavery in the southern colonies. It solidified the divide between social classes and laid the groundwork for a racially based system of labor that would shape the region for centuries to come. The rebellion highlighted the fears of the ruling class regarding potential alliances between different social groups, leading to the entrenchment of slavery as a means to maintain control and prevent future uprisings.

The shift from indentured servants to enslaved Africans as the dominant labor force further cemented the institution of slavery, with slave codes being implemented to enforce the subjugation of African people. The legacy of Bacon's Rebellion can be seen in the long-lasting impact it had on the expansion and perpetuation of slavery in the southern colonies.

Learn more about slavery

brainly.com/question/866336

#SPJ11

Communists -----------

Answer:

The main reasons for the Union's victory were its superior resources (including manpower), transportation, and industrial capacity, as well as the effective leadership of President Abraham Lincoln and the military strategies of General Ulysses S. Grant.

Explanation:

The Union's victory was primarily due to its superior resources (which includes manpower), transportation, as well as industrial capacity, as well as President Abraham Lincoln's effective leadership and General Ulysses S. Grant's military strategies.

The American Civil War ended in victory by the Union (sometimes referred to as the North). The Union won because of its superior resources (which includes manpower), transportation, as well as industrial capacity, as well as President Abraham Lincoln's effective leadership and General Ulysses S. Grant's military strategies.

Furthermore, the Union's decision to abolish slavery, as well as the support of abolitionists within the North, were critical to the Union's success. The Confederacy (or the South) enjoyed fewer resources and was primarily an agrarian economy, making a long war more difficult to sustain.

Learn more about Union, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29392448

#SPJ1

Male and female stuffed antelope, A weasel, several skins. Numerous horned animals belonging to the Family Bovidae have been referred to as antelopes.

Many species of even-toed ruminants that are native to different parts of Africa and Eurasia are referred to as antelopes. A variety of Old World grazing and browsing hoofed mammals that belong to the family Bovidae of the order Artiodactyla are collectively referred to as antelope. Only the genera Gazella, Nanger, Eudorcas, and Antilope are included in a more restrictive description, sometimes known as the "real antelopes." Although the pronghorn, a species found in North America, is sometimes referred to as the "American antelope," it actually belongs to a distinct family than the antelopes found in Africa and Eurasia. An antelope herd is a collection of antelope. Antelope horns grow continually, unlike the shed and regrown antlers of deer.

Learn more about antelope here

https://brainly.com/question/22300839

#SPJ4

Answer:

If we give a president unlimited power, time, and money to fight an enemy he could of course abuse of his position as president. The president could fund all of the government's money into the war to fight the enemy. He could possibly enlist many young people to go and fight in the war. There could also be shortages in supplies like food, lumber, etc. The nation in which this president is located could suffer many other problems.

Explanation:

Answer:

The one in United States is better

Explanation:

Answer:

Rights? Independence? Either of those may work.

Explanation:

Hope this helps you as much as intended.

The battle you are talking about is the Battle of Palmito Ranch. This battle took place on May 12 and 13, 1865, near Brownsville, Texas, and was the final battle of the American Civil War. The battle was fought over control of the port of Brownsville, which was a critical location for the shipment of cotton to Mexico.

The Union forces, under the command of Col. Theodore H. Barrett, had been in control of Brownsville since the summer of 1863. The Confederate forces, under the command of Col. John S. “Rip” Ford, had been trying to retake the city for several months.In the early morning of May 12, 1865, the Confederate forces launched a surprise attack on the Union forces at Palmito Ranch. The Union forces were caught off guard and were quickly routed. The Confederates pursued the retreating Union forces, but they were eventually pushed back by a Union counterattack.

The battle was short and fierce, lasting only about 30 minutes. The Union forces suffered 113 casualties, including 34 killed, while the Confederate forces suffered only 26 casualties. The battle was a Confederate victory, but it had no impact on the outcome of the war, as the Confederacy had already surrendered in April of that year.In conclusion, the Battle of Palmito Ranch was the final battle of the American Civil War, fought on May 12 and 13, 1865, near Brownsville, Texas.

It was a Confederate victory, but it had no impact on the outcome of the war as the Confederacy had already surrendered in April of that year.

To know more about shipment visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31974268

#SPJ11

Answer: d

Explanation: ↑

The case of McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819 was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States.

The case dealt with the issue of whether or not the federal government had the power to create a national bank and whether or not states had the power to tax it. In the decision, the Court ruled that the federal government had the power to create a national bank, and that states did not have the power to tax it. This ruling established the concept of federal supremacy, which means that federal law takes precedence over state law in certain areas. This case had significant implications for the balance of power between the federal government and the states, and remains an important precedent in American jurisprudence today.

To know more about McCulloch v. Maryland visit:

https://brainly.com/question/546157

#SPJ11

One of the root causes of the major strike at the Pullman plant in 1893 was the deteriorating working and living conditions for the workers.

The Pullman Company, which manufactured railroad cars, implemented wage cuts without reducing the rent and prices in the company town of Pullman, where the workers lived. This created a situation of economic hardship and dissatisfaction among the workers, leading to their organized protest and strike. The workers demanded better wages, reduced rents, and improved living conditions, which were not being adequately addressed by the company. The strike at the Pullman plant became a significant event in the labor movement and highlighted the grievances of workers in the face of unfair labor practices and the unequal distribution of wealth.

To know more about Pullman plant,

https://brainly.com/question/1674653

#SPJ11

Answer: Smith argued that by giving everyone freedom to produce and exchange goods as they pleased (free trade) and opening the markets up to domestic and foreign competition, people's natural self-interest would promote greater prosperity than with stringent government regulations.

A: Personally yes i do agree with him, the reason being is that with the trade restrictions your no allowed to trade what you want there taking freedom from you and that could ruin profit and progress on your business which will lead to failure in the long run.

Explanation: Also did Reinhart assign anything other than this lame homework?

Answer:

im making the essay rn, give me a little time

Explanation:

War Industries Board and National War Labor Board were the functions or results of the following wartime agencies and laws.

War Industries Board was the established on July 28, 1917. It was the created the agencies in the World War I. It was the War Department and the Navy Department are to creation the strategies against the enemy.

According to the War Industries Board and National War Labor Board. It was the created in the wartime agencies and laws. The National War Labor Board in April 1918  was the resolved of the labour disputes.

As a result, the significance of the War Industries Board and National War Labor Board are the aforementioned.

Learn more about on War Industries Board, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28726370

#SPJ1

Answer:

Spain,education,Christianity,corrupted,enslaved

Explanation:  

Answer:

Spain, Education, Christianity, Corruptted, Enslaved

Explanation:

army is a group of people fighting for something or someone.

The principle is at the top of the social structure of a school, for example, with teachers, staff, and students following. The priest or minister is at the very top of the social structure in a church.

The social theory offers three degrees of contemplation rules for dealing with difficulties at any time. First, the guiding principles: solidarity, subsidiarity, and the common good; next, the evaluation standards, which are heavily emphasised in Benedict XVI's Encyclical Caritas in Veritate; and lastly, the instructions for action.

The Catholic Church declares that human life is sacrosanct and that a society's moral foundation rests on the dignity of every individual.

To know more about church visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/11788311

#SPJ1

The Tlingit and the Haida rely heavily on subsistence activities such as hunting, fishing, and wild food gathering as an integral part of their way of life. In addition, for a very long time, the Tribe has made its baskets, boats, and shelter from of natural materials.

This is further explained below.

Generally, The Tlingit coastal people built wealthy communities on the abundant riches of the Pacific Northwest's forest and sea.

"The Tlingit people relied mostly on hunting, fishing, and wild grazing for their subsistence. For the purpose of making baskets, boats, and houses, this tribe depends on natural resources.

Tlingit artisans are well known for their magnificent Chilkat robes and weavings, as well as their totem poles and basket weaving.

Although they also killed seals and sea otters and gathered wild berries, roots, and fruits, the Tlingit mostly relied on fishing for their nourishment.

They built their homes out of cedar taken from nearby woods. The coastal peoples of the Pacific Northwest had a similar clan structure, aesthetic, and use of warships."

Read more about Tlingit people

https://brainly.com/question/28443171

#SPJ1

Answer:

Thales of Miletus

Leonardo da Vinci

Thomas Edison

Benjamin Franklin.e.t.c

Answer:

Thomas Edison

Explanation:

one of history greatest inventor ..

he credited light bulb,the pphonograph ,motion picture camera

Answer: One of the main reasons people moved west was for the land. There was lots of land, good soil for farming, and it could be bought at a cheap price. There were many different opportunities to get rich, such as: logging, mining, and farming that could not be done in the east.

The given statement, "The statement that Cultural Relativism says that there are no universal truths in ethics; there are only various cultural codes, and right and wrong are only determined by the norms of society" is True because because cultural relativism posits that ethical standards are culturally determined and vary across different societies.

The given statement, "With Cultural Relativism, you are NOT justified in criticising the ethics of other cultures" is False because cultural relativism allows for the examination and critique of ethical practices in other cultures, although it acknowledges that judgments should be made within the context of the respective cultural norms.

The given statement, "Cultural relativism does not say that we cannot ethically judge the Russian invasion of Ukraine" is False because cultural relativism does not preclude ethical judgment in situations such as the invasion of Ukraine, as it permits critical evaluation of actions based on universal ethical principles while considering cultural context.

Cultural relativism is the view that ethical beliefs are culturally determined, and hence what is considered ethical in one culture might be unethical in another. Cultural relativism, therefore, suggests that no universal ethical standards exist to assess all human practices and beliefs on a global scale.

Cultural relativism implies that when we assess a practice or belief from a different culture, we should not assess it in light of our own cultural practices and beliefs but instead try to understand it on its terms.

Criticism of cultural practices from other societies becomes difficult to justify, and practices like female genital mutilation or arranged marriages might be impossible to criticize by adherents of cultural relativism.

Learn more about Cultural Relativism: https://brainly.com/question/10627704

#SPJ11