which law finally required states to release any relevant information aobut registered sex offenders necessary to maintain and protect public safety

Answer:

Probably 3. and 4. but it seems subjective

Explanation:

Prosecutors are known for being among the best lawyers in the nation.

They deal with high-stakes court cases.

Most say the challenging work is also very rewarding.

Just got it right : )

Answer:

Answer is C

Explanation:

I took the test

Answer:

5,940,716

Explanation:

that is what it is

Answer:

5940716

Explanation:

Answer:

Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself

Explanation:

In three states, Ripe Orchards, Inc. employs hundreds of seasonal and year-round laborers, both skilled and unskilled. Ripe orchards are not permitted to employ illegal immigrants in any capacity under federal immigration law.

Under no circumstances is anyone to enter the studio if the red light is on outside. It denotes that a song is being recorded.

It is forbidden to leave this deadly medication anyplace in the hospital where the general public could access it.

Before or after a remark, you might say in the circumstances or under the circumstances to show that you have thought about the factors influencing the issue.

To Know more about immigration law.

https://brainly.com/question/941204

#SPJ4

Yes, this decision precludes a lottery group from being a partnership.

This decision precludes a lottery group from being a partnership because a partnership is a type of business structure in which two or more people own a business together and share profits and losses, while a lottery group is simply a group of individuals who pool their money together to purchase lottery tickets in hopes of winning.The parties could have prevented this dispute by creating a formal partnership agreement that outlined the terms of the partnership, including how profits and losses would be divided, how decisions would be made, and what would happen if the partnership dissolved. The agreement could also have addressed what would happen if one party contributed more money to the group than the others or if one party claimed a larger share of the winnings. This would have provided clear guidelines for the group and could have prevented any misunderstandings or disputes.

To know more about agreement visit:

brainly.com/question/32579265

#SPJ11

The reasons there are more private security than police are:

In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.

Find out more about private security at https://brainly.com/question/7203143.

Answer:

Statement B. best describes a representative government.

The  statement best illustrates about the representative democracy is Citizens elect officials who express voters' interests in the government. Thus, option B is correct.

In contrast to direct democracy, representative democracy, also known as indirect democracy, is a style of democracy in which elected officials represent a group of people.

A representative democracy is preferred in governments with a moderate to large population because it balances efficiency with power-sharing.

It is also known as representational governance or indirect democracy. Representative democracy is vital because it allows people to get to know their representatives before voting for them. Therefore, it can be concluded that option B is correct.  

Learn more about democracy here:

https://brainly.com/question/13158670

#SPJ2

If the german police suspect drivers of driving while intoxicated, they may demand, using force if necessary, that drivers submit to a urine or bac test.Given statemnet are true.

Blood alcohol content (BAC), also known as blood alcohol concentration or blood alcohol level, is a legal or medical measurement of alcohol intoxication;[1] it is expressed as mass of alcohol per volume or mass of blood. A BAC of 0.10 by volume (0.10% or one tenth of one percent) means that there is 0.10 g of alcohol in every 100 mL of blood, which equals 21.7 mmol/L.

A blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.10 by mass (0.10%) equals 0.10 g of alcohol per 100 g of blood (23 mmol/L). A BAC of 0.0 is considered sober; in different countries, the maximum permitted BAC when driving ranges from about 0.04% to 0.08%; BAC levels above 0.08% are considered severely impaired; and above 0.4% is considered severely impaired.

Learn more about Blood alcohol content (BAC), to visit this link

https://brainly.com/question/2231540

#SPJ4

The domestic violence study conducted by Sherman and Berk in 1984 had an ethical concern in that it perpetuated stereotypes about women. The study involved observing and interviewing couples who had experienced violence within their relationship.

However, the researchers framed the study in a way that suggested that domestic violence was a "mutual combat" rather than a form of abuse perpetuated by men against women. This perpetuated the harmful stereotype that domestic violence is a problem caused by both partners in a relationship rather than a form of abuse perpetuated by men against women. While the study did not involve the use of animals or cause physical harm to participants, it was conducted without consent. The researchers did not obtain informed consent from the participants, and they did not provide adequate protection for the participants' confidentiality. This is a significant ethical concern in any research study, as it violates the fundamental principle of respect for autonomy and the protection of human subjects. In conclusion, while the Sherman and Berk domestic violence study did not involve the use of animals or cause physical harm to participants, it did perpetuate harmful stereotypes about women and was conducted without proper consent and confidentiality protections. These ethical concerns highlight the importance of conducting research studies in an ethical and responsible manner, with the welfare and rights of human subjects always being a top priority.

Learn more about stereotype here:

https://brainly.com/question/11828816

#SPJ11

The congress system of diplomacy differs during the two periods differs because its main aim is to prevent any one state from becoming overly powerful. option (B) is correct.

The Congress Framework involves worldwide exertion which endeavors to keep up with harmony and dependability in Europe by having a normal congress among its Extraordinary Powers.

Be that as it may, the congress arrangement of tact varies during the two-time frame contrasts because its fundamental point is to keep any one state from turning out to be excessively strong.

Learn more about congress system:

https://brainly.com/question/8834809

#SPJ4

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:

The Congress system of diplomacy in the early nineteenth century differed most strongly from the

diplomatic arrangements in Europe during the period between the peace of Westphalia and the French

Revolution in that members of the Congress system

a. were dedicated to spreading a single form of Christianity throughout Europe

b. sought to prevent any one state from becoming overly powerful

c. were largely in favor of dismantling tariffs and other trade barriers between European states

d. were explicitly committed to intervening in other states to preserve existing regimes

The provision that purports to relieve the defendant of a duty of care that they would otherwise owe to the plaintiff is called an exculpatory clause or release.

It is a contractual provision that attempts to shift the risk of harm from the party responsible for causing it to the injured party.

Exculpatory clauses are often used in situations where there is a potential for injury or harm, such as in recreational activities like skydiving or bungee jumping, or in sports like skiing or snowboarding. By signing a contract or agreement that includes an exculpatory clause, the plaintiff agrees to assume the risks associated with the activity and waives their right to sue the defendant for any injuries sustained.

However, exculpatory clauses are not always enforceable. Courts will typically look at several factors when determining whether an exculpatory clause is valid, including the clarity of the language used, the nature of the activity involved, and the relative bargaining power between the parties.

In some states, such as California, exculpatory clauses are prohibited by law in certain circumstances, such as in agreements involving personal injury or wrongful death claims. In other states, courts will closely scrutinize exculpatory clauses and may refuse to enforce them if they are deemed to be against public policy or unconscionable.

Overall, exculpatory clauses can be a useful tool for parties to manage their risks and allocate responsibilities, but they must be carefully drafted and reviewed to ensure that they are enforceable and do not violate any applicable laws or public policies.

learn more about exculpatory clause here

https://brainly.com/question/27222495

#SPJ11

Answer:

to completion and you're analysis pls dont a person you trust

The legal ramifications of classifying a worker as an employee or an independent contractor are significant and can affect various aspects such as tax obligations, labor protections, and benefits. The classification determines how the worker is treated under employment laws and regulations.

Factors used to determine the classification may vary depending on the jurisdiction, but common considerations include:
Control: The degree of control the employer has over the worker's tasks, schedule, and methods of work. The more control exerted by the employer, the more likely the worker is considered an employee.
Independence: Whether the worker operates independently, has the freedom to provide services to other clients, and has control over their own business operations. Independent contractors typically have more autonomy in their work.
Integration: How integrated the worker's services are with the employer's business. Employees are typically more integrated into the employer's operations, while independent contractors may provide specialized services.
Financial arrangement: How the worker is compensated, whether they receive a salary, benefits, or reimbursement for expenses. Employees usually receive a regular salary and benefits, while independent contractors are responsible for their own expenses.
Intent of the parties: The mutual understanding and agreement between the worker and the employer regarding the nature of their relationship.
Misclassifying workers can result in legal consequences such as back taxes, penalties, and potential lawsuits for unpaid wages or benefits. It is important for employers to correctly classify workers to comply with labor laws and provide the appropriate protections and benefits.

To know more about jurisdiction, click here https://brainly.com/question/31921775

#SPJ11

Answer:

An Entomological Evidence Collection Kit.

Explanation:

Entomology can be defined as the scientific study of insects such as arthropods i.e living organisms having exoskeletons, a pair of antenna and compound eyes, three (3) body segments and six (6) legs.

Forensic entomology can be defined as the scientific study of the invasion of insects, as well as their arthropods counterparts on post-mortem bodies or decomposed cadavers in legal matters such as during legal investigation.

This ultimately implies that, forensic entomology deals with the scientific study of insects in order to help in establishing the true position of a dead victim of a crime before the actions and transport of the decomposed cadaver by insects. Also, this field of science can be used to establish a relationship between the suspect and the dead victim of a crime.

Hence, all law enforcement agencies need an Entomological Evidence Collection Kit in order to be prepared for a case involving forensic entomology because the insects and their arthropods counterparts or relatives when collected are kept safely in the kit for further investigation.

Answer:

I would think it could either. but to me I think it could be possible.

Explanation:

To accurately calculate the rate at which a particular drug will enter or leave the body is difficult.

Drug elimination serves as the term that explains how drug is been removed from the body.

However, to accurately calculate this can be difficult but with series of tests from the function of kidney some calculations can be done.

Learn more about Drug elimination at;

https://brainly.com/question/16510344

#SPJ2

Answer:

the two pieces of legislation relevant to use

in the workplace are listed below:

●The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

●The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.

Answer:

Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.

Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.

This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.

Overview of Public Nuisance Law

In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.

Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]

Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases

Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]

Answer:

social media use can also negatively affect teens, distracting them, disrupting their sleep, and exposing them to bullying, rumor spreading, unrealistic views of other people's lives and peer pressure. The risks might be related to how much social media teens use.

Explanation:

Answer:

the time required is 4.5 mins

Explanation:

The computation of the time that required to run home from school is shown below:

Given that as per the question

1 ÷ 6 km = 1 min

So,

1 km = 1 × 6

i.e.

1 km = 6 mins

Now to run 3 ÷ 4 km, the time required is

As we know

1 km = 6 mins

So,  

3 ÷ 4 km = 6 × 3 ÷ 4

3 ÷4 km = 4.5 mins

Hence, the time required is 4.5 mins

Conversational incivility is never expected. People who are truly knowledgeable and sage never behave rudely in social media conversations.

A positive and constructive discussion of a particular subject is always desired. When someone breaks the rules of civility, it looks like they don't know enough about the subject.

It is likewise found that many individuals offer mocking remarks and cruel analysis in the online entertainment. Many individuals utilize frightful words language that cross the constraint of fairness.

In any case, it should not hamper one's feeling. The discussion is also good if it is respectful and constructive. Individuals are of various perspectives and perspectives. There are people of various religions and cultures present. All individuals ought to regard one another.

In virtual entertainment we perceive the number of individuals that crossed the fairness and mutual respect. Even a lot of people said things that a gentleman would never say. Numerous people do not study and instead make insignificant remarks. It is detrimental to democracy.

The majority of nations imposed a lock down during the COVID-19 pandemic, and individuals were housed in boxes. Many individuals lost their employment and various individuals confronted extraordinary challenges.

Numerous individuals struggled greatly to earn a living. During that period many individuals upheld lock down and many individuals didn't uphold it. We observed instances of decency violations by enraged individuals on social media.

Learn more about Social Media:

brainly.com/question/31339287

#SPJ4

The theory that holds that deviant and criminal behavior results from regular exposure to attitudes favorable to acting in ways that are deviant or criminal is called "Social Learning Theory".

This theory posits that individuals learn how to behave through observation, imitation, and reinforcement of behaviors exhibited by those around them, including family members, peers, and media figures. According to social learning theory, if an individual is repeatedly exposed to deviant or criminal attitudes and behaviors, they may be more likely to adopt similar attitudes and engage in similar behaviors.Social Learning Theory was developed by Albert Bandura in the 1960s and 1970s. Bandura argued that behavior is learned through a process of observation and imitation, and that people are more likely to imitate behavior that is rewarded or reinforced in some way. He also suggested that behavior is influenced by factors such as cognition, motivation, and self-efficacy.

Social Learning Theory has been applied in a variety of contexts, including criminology and psychology. In criminology, the theory is often used to explain why some individuals become involved in criminal activities, while others do not. The theory suggests that exposure to deviant or criminal behavior may increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in similar behavior, and that prevention efforts should focus on reducing exposure to these behaviors.

Learn more about Social Learning Theory here;

https://brainly.com/question/22761112

#SPJ11

Option a is Correct. The assertions regarding the corporate tax filing requirements for corporations with a calendar year end are untrue for tax years beginning after December 31, 2015. By the 15th day of the third month after the end of the tax year, corporations are required to submit their annual federal income tax returns.

It can be claimed that a dividend distribution to the extent of the corporation's profits and earnings is given precedence in terms of the tax treatment of a distribution from the corporation to its shareholders. The allocation of the tax liabilities that the buyer and seller are responsible for paying is shown by the tax incidence.

The funds that businesses and individuals provide to the government in order to fund national operations. Tax on corporate income Businesses pay them a portion of their earnings. Capital gains: Any earnings or gains realized by individuals or organizations through the sale of certain assets, such as stocks, bonds, or real estate, are subject to a capital gains tax. Property tax: A local government assesses a property tax, which the owner of the property is responsible for paying.

Learn more about tax visit: brainly.com/question/26316390

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

For tax years beginning after December 31, 2015, which of the following statements regarding corporate tax filing requirements is false for corporations with a calendar year end?

a. Corporations must file their annual federal income tax returns by the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year.

b. Calendar year corporations may request an automatic five-month extension of time to file their federal income tax returns.

c. An extension of the income tax filing deadline does not extend the payment deadline for any balance of tax due for the taxable year.

d. Corporations must file their annual federal income tax returns by 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year.

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?

One of the policy options we explored was for the Fed to reduce or remove the reserve requirement ratio when it reached the zero bound. True.

The notion that interest rates cannot be decreased farther than zero is known as the "Zero Lower Limit." Historically, central banks have utilised monetary policy to influence the economy's interest rate in order to achieve its budgetary goal (s).

In fact, the Fed used a variety of other tactics to overcome the ZLB restriction after the crisis, including large-scale asset purchases (quantitative easing) and providing market participants with advance information on the direction of interest rates. The ZLB issue was not entirely solved by these policy improvements.

Learn more about zero bound Visit: brainly.com/question/29566776

#SPJ4

Answer:

Georgia v. Mccollum.

Explanation: