Which of the following best explains the Missouri Compromise of 1820?

As violence against slaves increased, the government created a haven for runaway slaves in Missouri.

By admitting both a slave state and a free state, the nation's legislature hoped to keep a balance of power.

As fights about slavery increased, the legislature voted to return the right to choose whether to be a slave or free state to the states.

By creating a group of border states between the North and South, the nation's leaders hoped to avoid increasing disputes over runaway slaves.

Answer:

Democratic-Republican Party

Explanation:

Answer: A

Explanation:

Assuming this is US history,

Native americans lived out west. Spain is south of the us, and france is all the way out east. Back in US History, the us was at conflict with the native americans out west, because Andrew Jackson (7th president) was trying to force the native americans to move even further out west to make room for new white settlers to take their place. This seems brutal, so andrew jackson said that he kicked the native americans out for "the sake of their own safety" from white settlers. in other words, andrew jackson's excuse was that he thought white settlers would harm the native americans so he was sending them away from their homes out of care for their well being.

Answer:

Creating the first map of the northern Gulf of Mexico

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Alonso Álvarez de Pineda commanded a Spanish expedition that sailed along the Gulf of Mexico coastline from Florida to Cabo Rojo, Mexico, in 1519. He and his men were the first Europeans to explore and map the Gulf littoral between the areas.

Answer:

3/4

Explanation:

So I'm dealing with these exact same sort of equations and so the way you do it is, depending on how your teacher wants you to solve it, you can find a spot where the line is alligned with a point and then find the nearest spot like that in this case (2,3) and (6,6). then you make two lines starting from (2,3) then you would go up until you allign with the same y-axis then do the same but sideways along the x-axis until you reach (6,6) and then mark said numbers where the y-axis is on top and the x-axis is on the bottom.

hope this helps

Answer:

The slope is 3/4

Explanation:

I'm not v good at explaining lol

Answer:

True

Explanation:

This is reflected by their language, food and even entertainment.

HOPE IT HELPED

Answer:

it is B

Explanation:

that selected a governor that recognized by the united states

Answer:

I'm not sure but it might be Daniel Boone. Is there a year that may help or topic.

Answer:

i also think it was daniel boone

Explanation:

Answer:

The greatest achievement of the Anti-Federalists was the addition of a Bill of Rights to the Constitution, which laid out the individual rights of all.

Hope this helps! Have a nice day :)

Answer:

here i hope this helps

Explanation:

The Iroquois Nation wants the British to leave because they are disrupting hunting and using up recourses that belong to the Native American. They think the British don't have the right to be there.

Considering the excerpt, the sentiment of the Iroquois Nation towards the British is that:

"the British are encroachers and should no longer stay on their land."

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the sentiment of the Iroquois Nation towards the British is that the British are encroachers, and should no longer stay on their land.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/579837

The correct options are:

A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes.

C. It ensures the separation of powers.

E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers.

Explanation:

The rule of law refers to the idea that everyone is equal under the law and that no one is above it. It helps to promote fairness and justice in society by providing a framework for resolving disputes and holding people accountable for their actions.

Here are the options that correctly describe how the rule of law affects society:

A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes. - The rule of law sets a standard for how people should behave and encourages them to follow the law to avoid consequences.

C. It ensures the separation of powers. - The rule of law helps to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful by ensuring that each branch has its responsibilities and limitations.

E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers. - The rule of law requires that lawmakers follow the same laws as everyone else, preventing them from abusing their power and ensuring that they are held accountable for their actions.

Option B is incorrect because the rule of law does not always prevent lawmakers from abusing their power. It helps to prevent abuse of power, but it is not foolproof.

Option D is also incorrect because the rule of law governs how laws are enforced, not how policies are created.

Hence, the answers are A, C, and E

Answer:

Douglass continues detailing Colonel Lloyd’s home plantation where he grew up. Lloyd has a large cultivated garden that people from all over Maryland come to see. Some slaves can not resist eating fruit out of it. To prevent them, Lloyd puts tar on the fence surrounding the garden and whips any slave found with tar on him.

Colonel Lloyd also has an impressive stable with horses and carriages. The stable is run by two slaves, a father and son named old Barney and young Barney. The Colonel is picky about his horses and often whips both men for minute faults in the horses that even they themselves cannot even control. Despite the injustice of this system, the slaves can never complain. Colonel Lloyd insists that his slaves stand silent and afraid while he speaks and that they receive punishment without comment. Douglass recalls seeing old Barney kneel on the ground and receive more than thirty lashes. The whippings are often performed by one of the Colonel’s three

Explanation: if you read you will find :)

Answer:

I think its the first option?

Explanation:

Answer:

One of the successful or functioning democracies in the British American colonies was the colony of Pennsylvania. The colony was founded by William Penn in 1681, who established a representative assembly, known as the Pennsylvania General Assembly, which was composed of elected representatives. The Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776 provided for a system of government that emphasized popular sovereignty and separation of powers, with an elected governor and a bicameral legislature. Pennsylvania was also known for its religious toleration and its commitment to freedom of speech and the press, which were enshrined in its state constitution.

Explanation:

Answer:

The British American colonies were a group of 13 colonies that were established by Great Britain in North America during the 17th and 18th centuries. These colonies were established as part of Britain’s colonial empire and were governed by British law and institutions. The colonies were successful in establishing self-government and democratic institutions. The most successful of these democracies was the colony of Pennsylvania, which was founded by William Penn in 1681. Pennsylvania was unique among the colonies in that it was founded as a haven for religious freedom and tolerance. The colony’s constitution, which was written by Penn himself, established a government that was based on democratic principles. The constitution provided for a unicameral legislature, which was elected by the people. The colony also had a system of courts that were independent of the executive branch. This system of government proved to be very successful and became a model for other colonies.

Explanation:

Hope it helps

Have a nice day!

Answer:

C. Representative democracy

Answer:

C. Representative Democracy

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Answer:

democracy

Explanation:

Answer: Power

Explanation: "Augustus came to power after the assassination of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE. "

Answer:

Simo Häyhä

Explanation:

Answer:

"Simo Häyhä, also known as “The White Death,” was a Finnish soldier who currently holds the record of most confirmed kills of any sniper ever. In 1939, at the dawn of World War 2, Josef Stalin made bold a move to invade Finland. He sent half a million men across Russia’s western’s border. Tens of thousands of lives were lost."

Answer:

While some argue that the use of atomic bombs was necessary to end the war quickly and save lives, others believe that it was a disproportionate and unnecessary act of violence that caused immense human suffering. The debate over the justification of the bombings continues to this day.

Explanation:

Answer:

The United States dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was not justifiable, since history has proven many times over that solving long term issues through violence will only most likely result in one of two solutions. The anger against each side lasts for at least as long as the issue was around. Or the other, it will be 'solved' for a short time, and even then will it only come back to more disagreements among the people, causing more violence, or better, just verbal debates and disagreements, although that rarely happens in large issues among nations.

When the US dropped the bombs, they were expecting a quick surrender of Japan, although it would have been better with less violence, talking it out, or even a smaller-range bomb, that wouldn't kill so much of the population and destroy so much land. The United States dropped the bomb for a personal benefit of a lower amount of American lives lost, contradicting the idea amongst most people to preserve all human life, and prevent death from occurring as much as possible. The action was personally considered an 'allegation', not legally, among many people; many others believe that it was necessary and justifiable. It would be difficult to gainsay others opinions on this matter, although you can certainly attempt to proselytize.

Partial Rebuttal for a more beneficial answer:

After dropping the first bomb, Japan had still not surrendered, enticing the United States to repeat the action. To have two bombs dropped on your own country after being warned would most likely make you want to surrender or obey the warring nation. In the end, it turned out to be a gain for the United States, and a great loss for Japan, basically the overall idea of the people of the United States.

Answer:

Explanation:

Significant changes enacted at the national levels included the imposition of an income tax with the Sixteenth Amendment, direct election of Senators with the Seventeenth Amendment, Prohibition with the Eighteenth Amendment, election reforms to stop corruption and fraud, and women's suffrage through the Nineteenth

Answer:The American voting public of the early 1900s was accustomed to the tenet that the best government was the least government. Progressive era politics changed that belief when government corruption became commonplace. Reformers like Teddy Roosevelt in Washington and Governor Hiram Johnson in California responded to an epidemic of political and civic corruption by expanding the role of government in regulating the economy and in giving citizens, for the first time, direct access to the legislative process.

Between 1910 and 1914, under Governor Hiram Johnson’s political leadership the California legislature expanded state government first by breaking the economic and political power of the Southern Pacific Railroad (SP). The reform legislature passed the Stetson-Eshelman Act, which increased the state Railroad Commission’s authority and power to fix passenger and freight rates; thus ending Southern Pacific Railroad’s (SP) crushing monopolistic practices. With the Public Utilities Act and the creation of the Public Utility Commission (PUC), the agency’s commissioners had the authority over the railroads as well as all public utilities.

The legislators also halted the political power of SP with the passage of reform mechanisms giving voters direct access to government and the legislative process. The initiative allowed voters to pass legislation; the referendum allowed the public’s veto of existing legislation; and the recall permitted the removal of elected officials. The direct primary, the popular election of U.S. senators, and cross-filing for Republican and Democratic candidates changed the control over who got elected from party bosses to the voters. In passing these measures, Governor Johnson and the legislature had achieved the political goal of engaging ordinary citizens in participatory democracy. The systemic power of SP was over, but the government’s role in shaping its citizens’ quality of life was still growing.

In order to address workers’ fears of losing their livelihood through sickness or job-related accidents, the legislature passed the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance, and Safety Act in 1913, which in turn set up an Industrial Accident Commission and State Compensation Insurance Fund. This was ground-breaking work by government, which had only recently been in the business of protecting only business interests. Setting additional precedents, the legislature curtailed child labor, and also set an 8-hour day and minimum wage for female industrial workers.

In the field of education, Hiram Johnson’s reform government called for teacher pensions, free textbooks for public school children, the creation of a comprehensive curriculum, and mandatory kindergartens. The kindergarten movement, begun in Germany in the 1830s, found a ready American enthusiasm by women reformers who believed that kindergarten was as important an educational experience as college. By 1878, the first free public kindergarten was established in San Francisco. Enthusiastic financial support led to still more kindergartens, so that by 1894, 235 more of them were set up nationally and globally, based on the California model. Public university education also received the attention of reform initially through the generosity of Phoebe Apperson Hearst, mother of publisher William Randolph Hearst. In the 1890s her financial support of the University of California, Berkeley made possible the construction of the outdoor Greek Theater, a women’s gymnasium, a university museum and the Department of Anthropology. The University of California continued its academic growth through the appointment of Benjamin Ide Wheeler, who, over a 19-year period, established twenty new departments.

Neither progressive politicians nor unions helped minority laborers in the nation and in California. Blacks were excluded from union membership. Chinese were excluded from immigrating to the U. S. In 1907 Japan agreed through a Gentlemen’s Agreement reached with President Roosevelt not to issue passports to Japanese workers, thus also eliminating Japanese from the American work force. Japanese in California, through the passage of the Alien Land Law, were prohibited from owning land in the state. Women, however, fared better. In addition to legislation improved their working conditions, they also received the right to vote. While Governor Johnson did not openly endorse the Amendment that would grant suffrage, he did help get it on the ballot. It passed by 3,587 votes.

The logical fallacy "begging the question" is shown by the phrases - “She is uncultured and does not care about art” . Hence, the third option is the correct answer.

A fallacy is the use of flawed or otherwise flawed thinking in the development of an argument, which, if ignored, may appear to be well-reasoned.

The term "begging the question" refers to drawing a judgement without offering supporting evidence. It happens when the premises of an argument presuppose the validity of the conclusion rather than providing evidence for it.

In the phrase: “She is uncultured and does not care about art”, there was no factual information provided that would prove that the mayor does not care about art.

Therefore, the third phrase in the given options is the appropriate phrase which represent the logical fallacy known as begging the question.

To learn more on fallacy, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29368484

#SPJ3

Answer:

so abc= 123 and 123= abc so what is Def=___

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

photograph shows this relationship to reality perfectly: it shows the reality set before the lens just as it is, without human interference

Answer:

Read below (sorry for my spelling btw I don't speak english that well nor do I type it that well)

Explanation:

Many ideoglies evolve over the years and places like the United Kingdom have constusinal moncarchies meaning they have democracy and all but they still keep a royal family, who have power, but can't do stuff like kill off everyone they want, mainly because stuff like the house of common exists in the UK. Belgium also has one, and I guess you can consider the Pope as a "king" but not really. Somethings remained the same like how they do get royal respect, tons of cash I guess, and make some political choices.

Answer:

(the same answer as the other persons but correct spelling)

Many ideologies evolve over the years and places like the United Kingdom have constitutional monarchies meaning they have democracy and all, but they still keep a royal family, who have power, but can't do stuff like kill off everyone they want, mainly because stuff like the house of common exists in the UK. Belgium also has one, and I guess you can consider the Pope as a "king" but not really. Somethings remained the same like how they do get royal respect, tons of cash I guess, and make some political choices.

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Words We Hear

The first way God speaks is the one that’s most often associated with hearing his voice: words we hear. While we would all love to hear an ‘audible’ voice, hearing God’s voice speak in this way appears somewhat rare and particularly reserved for those moments when we’re about to step out into the traffic! The word ‘audible’ itself may indeed be a misnomer – according to my doctoral research, most of those who have experienced it, say it would not have been heard by those around them (See Waiting for God to Speak Out Loud? Think Again). Mostly it seems, the Spirit speaks to us inaudibly and internally – with a message that sounds much like our own thoughts – i.e the ‘still small voice’ of Elijah’s experience (1 Kings 19:9-13).

When God speaks in words, he may give us a single phrase or he may use full sentences. He may use a wordplay (eg. Jeremiah 1:11-12) or give us a riddle that calls us to ponder (Numbers 12:8). Often he’ll ask a question to get us thinking (1 Kings 19:9, 2 Chronicles 1:7) and as the conversation continues, he reveals something more significant later on.

2. Pictures We See

The second way God speaks is in pictures that we see. As God said through the prophet Jeremiah; “Which of them has stood in the council of the Lord to see or to hear his word?” (Jeremiah 23:18, italics mine). We hear his message through words, but we see his message through pictures.

At first, this may seem an unusual way to speak, but we need to remember picture language is the most basic of languages. When children first learn to read, we give them a picture book to practise with – not the Oxford Dictionary. Further, imagery is the most expressive way to communicate which is why it is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. Perhaps this is why God communicates in this way so often in the Scriptures, particularly in the Old Testament where dreams and visions comprise ⅓ of the content (Read: Dreams – God’s Favourite Form of Communication).

When God speaks in pictures, his message comes in dreams when we’re sleeping or visions when we’re awake. Sometimes the picture speaks symbolically and requires interpretation (see for example; The Meaning of Vehicles in Dreams). Other times, the scene is more literal.

Sometimes God’s visual messages are full of riddles, poetry and allegorical forms that are not easily interpreted or measurable. These can be compared to the parables of Jesus which use images or scenes to communicate an idea. Walton suggests that the reason word pictures are used by God is to engage the right side of our brains.1 (This idea was touched on in the podcast: Are Women Better at Hearing God’s Voice?)

Communication in picture form is a way of speaking that the Western church often finds difficult to accept. Writers like Dallas Willard2 and Wayne Grudem3 have gone so far to say it is not a valid way to hear God’s voice. The reasons are primarily historical – an unfortunate product of Reformation thinking that downplayed the so-called mystical forms of spiritual experience. In fact, imagery is the most common form of communication in the Scriptures and can be the most powerful and creative way of all (Read Why God Speaks in Dreams and Visions or listen to this podcast as an example).

3. Emotions We Feel

Finally, God’s messages may come packaged as emotions we feel. In other words, we sense what God is saying to us. The emotion of the Holy Spirit is felt physically and this in itself communicates a message.

So the presence of hope may invade us, comforting us and calling us forward (Galatians 5:22-23, 1 Corinthians 14:3). Peace becomes a guide to lead us (Colossians 3:15) and a deep-seated conviction may turn us around (John 16:8). A friend of mine with a ministry in healing often experiences a sense of sadness when she meets someone who the Holy Spirit wants to touch in a profound way.

One of the reasons why dreams can be such powerful communicators is because the emotion we experience in them becomes part of the message. Daniel felt deep anguish when he first experienced his visions (Daniel 10:1-9), John found himself weeping (Revelation 5:4) and Peter was revulsed by what he had seen in his trance (Acts 10:14). Of course on the other hand, feelings of guilt, shame, fear or condemnation are never a part of God’s communiqués to us.

So God speaks to us in words, pictures and emotions. There are other forms too – although these are not as common. In my doctoral studies, I’ve interviewed people who have heard from the Holy Spirit through the senses of taste and smell! God packages his message to us in a myriad of forms. He is a masterful communicator who knows how to get his message across to those who are listening.

Answer: False

Explanation: It was twice a day not three times a day so its false

Answer:

a

I sam not sure but it's a

Answer:

C - Southern Bread Riots.

Explanation:

The riots were triggered by the women's lack of money, provisions, and food. Refugees had flooded the cities causing severe shortages of housing and overwhelming the old food supply system. Richmond's population tripled from 38,000 people in 1860 to over 100,000 by 1863.

Hope this helped!

-Toshino

Answer: How did Central America gain their independence?

Image result for Write a chronicle about the independence process in Central America

In 1821 a congress of Central American Criollos in Guatemala City composed the Act of Independence of Central America to declare the region's independence from Spain, effective on 15 September of that year. That date is still marked as independence day by most Central American nations.

Explanation: <3

Answer: During the twentieth century, Mexico and the other nations of Central America expirence difficult transitions to political independence.

Explanation:>> MEOW