Which of the following does not show an appropriate use of inclusive language?
- Speaking up at a meeting to recognize your colleague's amazing work
- Writing an email message to your supervisor when you're very upset about a hiring decision you just heard about
- Telling your coworker that your friend is a really great person that anyone would like
- Referring to someone's ethnicity with an unnecessary descriptor, such as "I'd like you to meet our Asian sales representative Mary"

Cover letters are essential because they allow job seekers to make a compelling case for their qualifications and demonstrate genuine interest in the position.

In conclusion, the importance of cover letters cannot be overstated, as they play a crucial role in presenting a candidate's qualifications, showcasing their enthusiasm, and standing out in the competitive job market.

For more such questions on cover letters:

https://brainly.com/question/3602860

#SPJ8

Answer:

Explanation:

Government sanctioned violence under Mao was interpreted by Mao as necessary to preserve the state of continuous revolution, in which China would continue to evolve and shed the shackles of its dynastic past. Although violence was used against political opponents, Mao was more secure in his power and there was not as much threat of overthrow. Mao's main objective in his violent projects, such as the Cultural Revolution,was to keep China from achieving stability and the complacence that may have came with it. Although misguided, his intention was for a new China, united under the doctrine of Communism and with a desire to start fresh, to emerge. Stalin mainly used violence as a tool for suppressing dissent and consolidating his power. He did not want to cause disorder through violence, which was a secondary objective for Mao, but wanted to make sure that no one could challenge his dominance in the USSR. He sent political opponents to gulags or had them killed for the sake of making them disappear, while Mao often sent people in the party to internment camps for "reeducation", only to call upon them later to serve in the government.

A poetic language element is not necessary for a historical essay. The correct option is E. In a history essay, a claim or argument about one or more historical events will be described, and the claim will be supported by examples, arguments, and sources.

Because the poet creates his language as he goes and establishes his own rules, Brooks emphasizes in this passage that poetic language is fundamentally different from scientific language. Therefore, the poet has control over language and must actively contribute to the development of literature's meaning.

History essays typically call for both primary and secondary sources. The resources that were produced during the historical era being studied are called primary sources. Secondary sources are those written on the subject by historians and academics.

Thus, the ideal selection is option E.

Learn more about historical events here:

https://brainly.com/question/11344213

#SPJ2

Answer:

trade, involving buying and selling goods, maintains a smooth flow of commerce and thereby supports industry

Explanation:

trading is involed of selling your things to other people and buy from other people. industry includes all the activities needed to produce the final product. they are almost the same though cause they both include aids to trade.

Answer:

"A"

Explanation:

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

The reason for this is due to the fact that senators equally represent each state, and are 1. registered to live in the state they represent, and 2. have to meet with peoples such as boards of education, county governments,  and the Governor of the state to make decisions in the ideal interests of their personal state and the United States as a whole.

Answer:

kk and thxxxxx

Explanation:

The correct answer is B. Communism.

Explanation

Communism is a political, social, and economic ideology that arose from Socialism with the difference that is a more radical expression of it. In Communism means of production is property of the State. Second, while in socialism social classes must seek coexistence among themselves, in communism social classes are eliminated and all are equal. Therefore, the correct answer is B. Communism

Answer:

option no. 3

Explanation:

Because Aryans spoke himself sanskrit

A general overview of the political background of the United States' inclusion in international organizations.

The United States' decision to join an international organization is typically influenced by a combination of political, economic, and strategic factors. Historically, the United States has been actively involved in various international organizations, such as the United Nations (UN), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and many others. Support for America joining an organization can come from different quarters.

It often depends on the perceived benefits and alignment of objectives. Supporters of U.S. inclusion may include policymakers, diplomats, internationalists, business leaders, and advocates of global cooperation. They believe that participating in international organizations allows the United States to promote its interests, exercise influence, foster diplomatic relations, and address global challenges through multilateral cooperation.

On the other hand, opposition to U.S. involvement in an organization can also exist. Critics may argue that membership could compromise national sovereignty, limit policy autonomy, or impose burdensome financial obligations. Opposition may come from political factions, isolationists, skeptics of international cooperation, or those who believe that the organization's agenda or actions contradict U.S. interests or values.

It is important to note that the specific political background, supporters, and opponents can vary depending on the organization and the particular context surrounding U.S. involvement. the political background of the United States' inclusion in international organizations, considering some specific examples.

United Nations (UN): The United States played a pivotal role in the establishment of the UN in 1945 and has been a member since its inception. Supporters of U.S. membership emphasized the need for collective security, international cooperation, and the promotion of peace and stability.

They believed that active participation in the UN would enhance American influence, provide a platform to address global challenges, and safeguard U.S. interests. However, there have been critics who argue that the UN infringes on national sovereignty or that it is biased against U.S. interests, leading to occasional opposition from certain political factions.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): The United States was a founding member of NATO in 1949. Supporters of U.S. involvement saw NATO as a means to deter Soviet aggression during the Cold War, protect European allies, and promote stability in the region. NATO has generally enjoyed broad bipartisan support in the United States, with proponents highlighting its importance for transatlantic security cooperation.

However, some critics argue that NATO burdens the United States with disproportionate military and financial commitments, leading to occasional debates about the costs and benefits of U.S. participation World Trade Organization (WTO): The United States has been a member of the WTO since its establishment in 1995. Supporters of U.S. membership view the WTO as a vital platform for promoting global trade, reducing barriers, and resolving trade disputes. They argue that U.S. participation helps protect American businesses, ensure market access, and enforce fair trade practices.

Opposition to the WTO or specific trade agreements can arise from those who believe they negatively impact domestic industries or workers, leading to debates over trade policy and the balance between free trade and protectionism. It is important to note that the political background, supporters, and opponents can vary depending on the specific organization, geopolitical context, and prevailing domestic political dynamics. Different administrations or political parties may hold varying perspectives on the value of international organizations and their alignment with U.S. interests.

To know more about political background ,click

brainly.com/question/30687787

Hunter-gatherer societies are nomadic groups of people who depend on their surrounding environment for sustenance.

As a result, hunter-gatherers face a number of challenges in finding and procuring food. In this context, this article will discuss some of the challenges that hunter-gatherers face in finding and procuring food.A lack of reliable sources of food: Hunter-gatherers face a constant struggle to find and gather enough food to feed their communities.

Due to a lack of reliable sources of food, they must often travel long distances to find the resources they need to survive. This can be especially challenging during times of drought or other environmental crises, when food is scarce.

Predation: Hunter-gatherers must contend with a number of predators in their environment, including large cats, bears, and wolves. As a result, they must be vigilant at all times to avoid being attacked by these animals. They must also be skilled in hunting and trapping to avoid being attacked by other predators.A changing environment: Hunter-gatherers depend on the environment around them to provide food.

They must be able to adapt to changing conditions, and be prepared to move to new locations when resources become scarce or depleted. This can be especially challenging in today's world, where hunter-gatherer communities are increasingly being displaced by modern civilization.

These are some of the challenges that hunter-gatherers face in finding and procuring food. Despite these challenges, many hunter-gatherer communities have developed sophisticated strategies for finding and gathering food, and have thrived in their environments for generations.

For more such question on nomadic groups visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6391877

#SPK8

Answer:

Explanation:

The architecture of Nepalese temples and ancient Greek structures is similar. Both countries have their own distinct culture and traditions. Both Ancient Greece and Nepal are deeply religious and worship a variety of gods.

Answer:

Washington opposed alliances that could drag the country into war.

Explanation:

George Washington was the first President of United States of America. He was a military general, a political leader and is considered as the Founding Father.

In the farewell speech of Washington, he said that the United States should remain neutral and that the U.S. would not form any alliances or sign any treaty that would drag United States into the war.

He was not opposed of any foreign trade but did not want to indulge in the war by forming any alliance with other countries. Washington did not want that the new country of U.S. to be dragged into the war. Washington;s foreign policy was followed for many many years.

Answer:

Executive branch : 2

Legislative : 1

Judicial is 3

The Christian faith had a significant impact on the European Age of Exploration, which lasted from the 15th century to the 18th century, in addition to political, economic, and technological factors.

The Catholic Church began a significant work to spread Christianity all over the planet. Profound inspirations likewise supported European victories of unfamiliar terrains.

The European conquest of North America was fueled by a variety of ideas and technologies. However, religion was a major factor in nearly every European nation's colonization of North America.

The Age of Exploration was motivated simply by glory, gold, and God. That is, conquerors went to the New World to serve their country, hoping to gain personal power or wealth and spread Christianity, primarily Catholicism, to the despondent, pagan peoples of the Americas.

Learn more about Age of Exploration here:

https://brainly.com/question/949185

#SPJ1

After World War II, the United States experienced a significant shift in its foreign policy approach. Option A. The United States changed to a foreign policy of containing communism by any means necessary.

Following the end of World War II, the geopolitical landscape underwent a transformation marked by the emergence of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. The United States adopted a policy of containment, which aimed to halt the spread of communism and Soviet influence around the world.

Under this new foreign policy, the United States actively sought to counter the expansion of communism through various means. This included diplomatic efforts, economic aid, military alliances, and even military interventions when necessary. The Truman Doctrine, announced in 1947, was a key expression of this policy, pledging American support to nations threatened by communist aggression.

The containment policy was rooted in the belief that communism was a threat to democratic values, global stability, and U.S. national security interests. The United States engaged in actions such as the Marshall Plan, which provided economic assistance to war-torn European countries, and the formation of military alliances like NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization), aimed at deterring Soviet aggression. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

know more about Cold War here:

https://brainly.com/question/856013

#SPJ8

Zongzi was popular as it was a traditional Chinese food with deep cultural roots.

It was originally used as a tribute to worship ancestors and gods, it has become one of the most cherished traditional foods in China. With a history dating back centuries, Zongzi has spread far and wide reflecting its enduring cultural importance.

The combination of glutinous rice and various fillings, wrapped in leaves such as Ruo leaves, Hiiragi leaves or Guzi leaves gives Zongzi its distinct flavor and appearance. Its shapes commonly pointed and square, further contribute to its unique identity.

Read more about Zong

brainly.com/question/12050024

#SPJ1

Despite allowing France to maintain its West Indian sugar islands and giving Louisiana to Spain, the British took Canada from France and Florida from Spain during the French and Indian war.

The British and French possessions in North America were arrayed against each other during the French and Indian War (1754–1763), a theater of the Seven Years' War, with various Native American tribes supporting either side. Approximately 60,000 people lived in the French colonies at the outbreak of the war, compared to 2 million in the British colonies. Particularly, the outnumbered French were dependent on their native allies.

In 1756, two years into the French and Indian War, Great Britain formally declared war on France, sparking the start of the global Seven Years' War. Many people think of the French and Indian War as just the American theater of this war, but in the United States, it is seen as a stand-alone struggle.

To learn more about French and Indian War, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/904638

#SPJ13

Something that gives me hope about the current state of politics is the increasing engagement and activism of the general public in political system.

In recent years, we have witnessed a surge in political awareness and involvement, with more individuals expressing their opinions, participating in protests, and actively engaging in political discussions.

This heightened level of civic engagement indicates that people are becoming more invested in shaping the future of their communities and countries. It shows that individuals are willing to hold their elected officials accountable and work towards positive change.

On the other hand, something that I find concerning or frustrating about the current state of politics is the polarization and divisiveness that has become increasingly prevalent. Political discourse has become more hostile and fragmented.

The focus on partisan agendas and personal attacks often takes precedence over the greater good, which is frustrating and can impede meaningful change.

Overcoming this polarization and fostering a more civil and inclusive political climate is essential for addressing complex challenges and building a better future for all.

for similar questions on political system.

https://brainly.com/question/31423130

#SPJ8

The generational gaps are clear in documents 25.6 and 25.7, with the former highlighting the need of adults providing empathy and support for children, while the latter offers a more favorable view of teens.

These documents provide insight into how post-World War II society saw 1950s teen culture.

A document is a well-organized collection of facts and information. It may be seen both physically and digitally and is available as a printed paper, computer document, or website. A few examples of the many sorts of content that may be found in documents are text, images, audio, and video.

Document 25.5 lends credence to several cliches about teenagers in the 1950s, including their tendency for disobedient behavior and defiance of authority. Contrary to stereotypes from the 1950s, Document 25.7 highlights the positive contributions young people have made to society, such as their commitment to volunteerism and patriotism. There is no avoiding the generational distinctions between documents 25.6 and 25.7. The latter offers a more cheerful perspective of adolescence, even while the former emphasizes the need for adults to be sympathetic and compassionate to children. According to papers 25.5 and 25.10, males were supposed to be more assertive and active in 1950s teen culture, while girls were expected to be more subservient and restrained.

These recordings provide as evidence of the significant contributions that young people in the 1950s made to the larger post-World War II society and the beginning of a new era in American culture.

Learn more about post-World War II society: https://brainly.com/question/26741691

#SPJ1

Constitution: Centralized government power, stronger executive branch, ratification process, amendments.

Articles of Confederation: State sovereignty, unicameral legislature.

For more questions on Constitution

https://brainly.com/question/470736

#SPJ8

So essentially the question is: How can the state government go against the federal government?

The given information leaves no area for the passage but I can mildly infer what you mean.

To start:

So, constitutionally speaking, the States have more rights than the federal government.

We didn’t start out with a country which was then divided up into states.

Instead, we started out with states that all agreed to have a Federal Government that was given limited powers by those states. The states reserved the right of veto over many things the Federal Government might do. In fact, when the Confederation of Southern States decided to secede from the Union before the Civil War, they were prevented from doing so not because seceeding was unconstitutional (it wasn’t), but because the Federal Government went to war with the Southern States under president Abraham Lincoln and re-captured those lands with the same expansionist mindset that was used to take away the land of Native Americans in the Westward growth of this country. That Civil War resulted in more American deaths than WWI and WWII combined.

It is the nature of government to assume a necessity and right of top-down absolute control over everything and everyone of it’s subjects. The US Constitution was set up to prevent that, but most people who enter government are soon infatuated and addicted to power and our constitution has been chipped away at ever since. It is not so much that the written text of the constitution has been changed legally and voted on, but that a combination of lawmakers and judges throughout history have simply ignored the Constitution.

Thanks.

#SPJ1

Crawford Long, an American physician, is known for three main contributions: the use of ether as anesthesia, surgical innovation, and medical research.

Crawford Long, an American physician born in 1815, made several significant contributions to the field of medicine.

Overall, Crawford Long's contributions in the areas of anesthesia, surgical innovation, and medical research have left a lasting impact on the field of medicine, benefiting countless patients and influencing the development of modern medical practices.

For more questions on Crawford

https://brainly.com/question/31543804

#SPJ8

Malenkov's comparison of the US leader to Hitler likely stems from a combination of political motivations and historical parallels.

Malenkov's comparison is likely stems from perceiving authoritarian tendencies or policies in the US leader reminiscent of Hitler's regime.
To provide some context, Georgy Malenkov was a prominent Soviet politician who served as the Chairman of the Council of Ministers (the equivalent of the Prime Minister) in the Soviet Union during the early 1950s.

Comparing the US leader to Hitler could be seen as a rhetorical strategy employed by Malenkov to delegitimize and criticize the policies and actions of the US government. By drawing a parallel to Hitler, who is universally condemned for his authoritarianism, aggression, and human rights abuses, Malenkov is likely attempting to paint the US leader as similarly dangerous and unjust.

Moreover, Malenkov may be leveraging historical events to support his comparison. In the aftermath of World War II, the Soviet Union and the United States emerged as the two superpowers engaged in a Cold War, marked by ideological and geopolitical tensions. The rhetoric of comparing leaders to Hitler was not uncommon during this period, as both sides sought to portray their opponents as the embodiment of evil.

It is important to note that the comparison made by Malenkov should be understood in the context of political rhetoric and propaganda, rather than as a purely objective assessment. Such comparisons can be subjective and reflect the biases and interests of the person making them.

Know more about the political motivations here:
https://brainly.com/question/11740845

#SPJ8

Answer:

Explanation: It signifies how Europeans have come together, in the form of the EU, to work for peace and prosperity, while at the same time being enriched by the continent's many different cultures, traditions and languages.

In his letter, Jefferson is saying that he does not like that there is an omission of a Bill of rights from the Constitution.

The reason why Jefferson and people with similar views, want a bill of rights added is to protect people from the excesses of government and from abuse of power.

During the Constitutional Convention, Thomas Jefferson was one of those who advocated for a Bill of Rights that would protect various rights such as:

Thomas Jefferson believed that these were necessary to protect people from a government that might end up abusing the rights of its people like the British had done. This was also the same reason people with similar views to Jefferson were fighting for a bill of rights.

Find out more on a bill of rights at https://brainly.com/question/26191838

#SPJ1

The statements that is true about the People's Party is that it is dominated by the farmers and laborers.

This is a  political party formed in the 1890s mainly to represent the interests of farmers and laborers.

The people of the People's Party were also called the Populist.

Therefore, the statements that is true about the People's Party is that it is dominated by the farmers and laborers.

Read more about People Party

brainly.com/question/27043477

Answer:

The People's Party is considered a partial success because aspects of its reform agenda were adopted as law in the United States

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Decline of the Western Zhou Dynasty

2. The Battle of Changping and the Great Wall of China

3. Establishing Han Rule

4. Decline of Han Rule

5. The Battle of Fei River

6. Beginning of the Tang Dynasty

7. Rise of the Mongols

8. The Ming Dynasty

9. The Chongzhen Emperor

10. The Fall of the Qing DynastyExplanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

took the quiz