Answers
Integrity is not a basic element of a valid contract.
The four basic conditions or elements that a contract must meet in order to be binding: 1. the agreement, 2. the consideration, 3. contractual capacity, 4. legal object.
The proposition and acknowledgment together constitute the agreement.
the anticipated trade or what each party gets in return for his promise under the agreement consideration.
individuals suffering from psychological sickness, intoxicated persons, those under the time of greater part don't have a limit.
legal objects to be enforceable, the agreement can't be either illegal or against public policy .
Contract is a promise enforceable by law. The promise might be to follow through with something or to avoid following through with something. The creation of an agreement requires the shared assent of at least two persons, one of them normally making a proposition and another tolerant.
to know more about public policy click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3810659
#SPJ4
Related Questions
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
if the police act in accordance with the law, but make an unintended error, then the evidence can still be used. this is referred to as . group of answer choices the exclusionary rule the fruit of the poison tree probable cause the good faith exception
Answers
Answer:
The good faith exception
Explanation:
The good faith exception is a legal principle that allows evidence to be used in court even if it was obtained through a technical or unintentional violation of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. This exception applies when law enforcement officers act in good faith, believing that they are acting in accordance with the law, but their actions are later found to be in violation of the law. The Supreme Court has held that evidence obtained in good faith should not be excluded from a criminal trial.
What are the benefits and drawbacks of giving judges wide discretion to determine the sentence of individual offenders?
Answers
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, how is compulsory self-identification not a violation
of the Fourth Amendment?
Answers
The U.S. Supreme Court has held that compulsory self-identification, such as providing one's name to a police officer during a stop, is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment because it does not constitute a search or seizure
How is compulsory self-identification not a violation of the Fourth Amendment?According to The U.S. Supreme Court, it has held that compulsory self-identification, such as providing one's name to a police officer during a stop, is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment because it does not constitute a search or seizure.
The Court has reasoned that requiring a person to identify themselves to a police officer is a minimal intrusion on their privacy and is outweighed by the government's interest in ensuring public safety and enforcing the law.
However, there are limitations on the government's ability to compel identification, and the Fourth Amendment still requires that any stop or detention be based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
Learn more about Fourth Amendment at:https://brainly.com/question/29617389
#SPJ1
under communist economic ideology, collectivistic rights give way in the extreme to individual rights. True or False
Answers
The statement is false because under communist economic ideology, the collective is prioritized over the individual.
This means that individual rights are often limited or suppressed in favor of the greater good of the community or the state. In a communist system, resources and wealth are meant to be shared equally among all members of society, which can sometimes result in restrictions on personal property rights and individual freedoms.
However, it is important to note that the implementation of communist ideology has varied in different countries and historical contexts, and there have been instances where individual rights have been more emphasized than others.
Learn more about economic ideology https://brainly.com/question/12578449
#SPJ11
a recent study by the fbi found that most slain officers ________.
Answers
According to a recent FBI study, the majority of slain officers were pleasant and well-liked by their colleagues.
The FBI is a national security organization that is intelligence-driven and threat-focused, with both intelligence and law enforcement responsibilities.The FBI, as the lead agency for enforcing civil rights law, aggressively investigates hate crimes, color of law violations by public officials, human trafficking and involuntary servitude, and violations of freedom of access to clinic entrances.This federal authority is shared with the Bureau of Indian Affairs' Office of Justice Services. The FBI develops and implements strategies, programs, and policies to combat crime in Indian Country, which is under the FBI's jurisdiction. In Indian Country, the FBI's role includes program management.
Learn more about services here:
https://brainly.com/question/29979103
#SPJ4
If a license has been canceled the driver...
A. can continue driving as he goes about meeting the proper requirements.
B. will need to apply for a new license after meeting the proper requirements.
C. will not be able to apply for another license even if he meets the proper requirements.
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
will need to apply for a new license after meeting the proper requirements.
Why do some states leave it up to cities and counties to determine requirements for private security guards?
• Cities and counties provide better quality security.
•Cities and counties have more autonomy.
• Police and security share duties in cities and counties.
• Cities and counties are much more strict in law enforcement
Cites and counties have more autonomy
Answers
Option (d), Cities and counties have far harsher laws that must be followed. Several states let local governments to set the educational requirements for private security guards.
What is it that private security serves to safeguard?Private security is described as security provided by a person other than a government employee to secure or defend individuals, property, or both. This includes the provision of armored vehicle service. Private security services are offered to clients by private firms for a fee.
Private security is essential for ensuring the protection of people, objects, sensitive business information, and intellectual property.
Why are security and privacy important?It has to do with a person's ability to make their own decisions about the timing, manner, and purpose in which others handle their personal information. Privacy must be preserved if human rights to safety, autonomy, and dignity are to be upheld. Individuals have the freedom to develop their own unique selves.
Learn more about Private security: https://brainly.com/question/12505716
#SPJ1
Desmond and Beatrice have been friends for quite a long time. On 22nd June 2022, Desmond requested Beatrice accompany him to settle a matter between him and her friend, Princess. During the settlement, Beatrice did so well that Desmond promised her $250.00 within one week. Relying on this promise, Beatrice told her husband, Solomon, that she would buy him a pair of shoes at the end of the week. One week elapsed but Beatrice could not provide the shoes because Desmond failed to honor his promise. What area of law upon which the passage is based?
Answers
The fact that Desmond promised to pay Beatrice an extra amount and failed to deliver means that this passage is based on Breach of Contract.
What is Breach of Contract?A Breach of Contract occurs when a party breaks a promise that they made to another party. This means that they failed to uphold their side of a contract which then leads to the other party taking losses.
Desmond promised to give Beatrice $250 which means that he entered a unilateral contract. By not fulfilling that promise, he engaged in a breach of contract which Beatrice can take legal action for.
Find out more on unilateral contracts at https://brainly.com/question/15648341
#SPJ1
Which of the following is most true?
a. Illegal harassment and discrimination can apply to any protected category.
b. Illegal harassment and discrimination only applies to sex and gender.
c. Any type of harassment or discrimination is illegal.
d. Company policies cannot be more restrictive than the law requires.
Answers
The most accurate statement is that any type of harassment or discrimination is illegal. (option c)This answer is consistent with U.S. federal and state laws, as well as international conventions, which generally prohibit discrimination and harassment based on race, sex, age, disability, religion, national origin, and other protected categories.
In addition, harassment and discrimination can take many forms, such as unwelcome conduct that creates a hostile or offensive work environment, unfair treatment in employment decisions, and retaliation against employees who complain about discrimination or harassment. Therefore, it is important for employers to have policies and training programs that promote diversity, inclusion, and respect in the workplace.
Company policies can be more restrictive than the law requires, as long as they do not discriminate or retaliate against employees who engage in protected activities. However, it is recommended to ensure that company policies align with the law. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and state human rights agencies are responsible for enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and employees who believe they have been harassed or discriminated against can file a complaint with these agencies or pursue legal action.
To know more about harassment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32417535
#SPJ11
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answers
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
The following courts were common in England before the founding of the United States except:A) chancery courtsB) bankruptcy courtsC) merchant courtsD) equity court
Answers
The Correct answer is D) Equity courts. Equity courts were not common in England before the founding of the United States.
They emerged as a separate system of courts in England during the medieval period and developed distinct principles and procedures focused on providing equitable remedies and justice beyond the rigid rules of common law. While equity courts became a significant part of the legal system in England, they were not present in the United States before its founding. Instead, the United States inherited and adopted the common law tradition, including courts such as chancery courts, bankruptcy courts, and merchant courts, which were commonly found in England during that time.
Learn more about equity
brainly.com/question/30553181
#SPJ4
based on the graph, how many kidneys do patients demand when the price is $0?
Answers
Answer:
20,000
Explanation:
Elevate the following scenarios and determine which represents micha’s highest liability
Answers
This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Elevate the following scenarios and determine which represents micha’s highest liability
A. Rose is lost and pulls her car into Micha's driveway for a moment to get her bearings. B. Oscar is a twelve-year-old neighbor of Micha's who has snuck into Micha's backyard to swim in his pool. C. Juanita is a customer having a latte in the coffee shop Micha owns and operates. D. Ron is Micha's friend whom Micha has invited to his home to watch the Super Bowl.
Answer:
C. Juanita is a customer having a latte in the coffee shop Micha owns and operates.
Explanation:
Micha is responsible for all the people in her cafeteria, as well as being responsible for the food security of her customers. For this reason, we can say that when Juanita enters Micha's cafeteria, she consumes her products, she becomes Micha's responsibility. The other scenarios shown in the question, do not have the direct responsibility of Micha, or do not require any responsibility from her, but from third parties.
Pat sued Vince for breach of contract. Pat testified that Vince had agreed to work as a salesman for a 10 percent commission. Vince testified that the commission was to be 15 percent. There were no witnesses to the conversation that created the oral contract. Assume that the case is tried before a jury.
a. Which party has the burden of producing evidence as to the terms of the contract?
b. Which party has the burden of pursuasion?
c. What standard of proof is required? Explain
d. Is it possible for the jury to find for Pat without any corroborating evidence? Explain
Answers
Question: "Which party has the burden of producing evidence as to the terms of the contract?"
A) The initial Burden of producing Proof of the agreement which states that Vince had agreed to a 10% commission falls on the Plaintiff which in this case is Pat.
This position is based on the Latin maxim Semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit which means "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges"
A Plaintiff is a person (corporate or individual) who brings a legal case against another person (corporate or individual) in the court of Law. The other party who is being sued is called the defendant.
After the Plaintiff has provided evidence or proof of the agreement, to establish the fact regarding the case, the burden shifts to the defendant.
Question: "Which party has the burden of persuasion?"
B) Until the case is discharged, the burden of persuasion will rest solely on the Plaintiff (Pat). The Plaintiff will only succeed in its claim when they are satisfied with the persuasion of the plaintiff.
Once the burden of persuasion has been completely discharged as required by the trier(s) of fact, then, the party carrying the burden of persuasion will have won the case.
Question: "What standard of proof is required?"
C) Given that the case here is one regarding a dispute over the terms of a contract, the standard of proof, therefore, is the balance of probabilities. This is also used in civil claims.
Question: "Is it possible for the jury to find for Pat without any corroborating evidence?"
D) For Pat to win this case, he would need to provide evidence that proves beyond reasonable doubt that he and Vince had entered into a Sales Contract and that the term of the contract was a 10% commission to Vince, and that Vince agreed to it.
Cheers!
an attorney works as in-house counsel for a large international corporation and has daily contact with higher-level executives and managers. one day, a senior executive mentions casually to the attorney that he has offered lucrative stock options, worth millions of dollars, to a foreign government official who has agreed to give the corporation an exclusive contract to provide certain goods and services to the foreign state. the executive seems to think this is normal and good for the company, but the attorney believes it constitutes bribery of foreign officials, which would violate the foreign corrupt practices act (fcpa) and could subject the corporation to enormous fines and penalties. the attorney explains her concerns to the executive, including that the executive could face personal criminal charges in addition to bringing liability on the corporation, and she reminds him that she represents the corporation, not him personally. the executive is dismissive of her concerns, even though she approaches him several times about the matter.
Answers
According to the given case, an attorney works as in-house counsel for a large international corporation and has daily contact with higher-level executives and managers.
One day, a senior executive mentions casually to the attorney that he has offered lucrative stock options, worth millions of dollars, to a foreign government official who has agreed to give the corporation an exclusive contract to provide certain goods and services to the foreign state. The executive seems to think this is normal and good for the company, but the attorney believes it constitutes bribery of foreign officials, which would violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and could subject the corporation to enormous fines and penalties.
The attorney explains her concerns to the executive, including that the executive could face personal criminal charges in addition to bringing liability on the corporation, and she reminds him that she represents the corporation, not him personally. The executive is dismissive of her concerns, even though she approaches him several times about the matter.The attorney's ethical responsibilities are clearly defined in the given scenario. The attorney is responsible for representing the corporation and its interests.
She is not responsible for the senior executive's personal interests. Therefore, the attorney must take steps to protect the corporation from any wrongdoing. The attorney must raise her concerns with the corporation's management and ensure that they take appropriate action to remedy the situation. If the senior executive continues to ignore her concerns, she must take steps to escalate the issue to higher management or the board of directors.
The attorney must also be aware of her ethical responsibilities and obligations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and ensure that the corporation complies with all relevant laws and regulations.
For more such questions on executives
https://brainly.com/question/18510919
#SPJ11
A dead body of an elderly gentleman was discovered in an abandoned building. Blowfly pupae were found on the body. A missing person’s report was filed for an elderly gentleman who had wandered away from home just two days before. The body found was similar in age, height, and weight to the missing person. Could this possibly be the same person as the person described in the missing person’s report? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
It is possible although unlikely due to the fact that blowfly pupae were already found on the body. Pupae generally set in around 18-24 days after death. Possible if there were factors present that increased the rate of decomp drastically
According to the case, the evidence of pupa was he found in the 8 to 12 days. It was the search of the record on the police station of the missing person report.
What is report?The term report on the police station on the missing, abusing, and violent and the other cases was the report. It was the formal report on the address the case on the police station. It was at least 24 hours in the day to register the report.
According to the case, pupa was at least 8 to 12 days as the found on the missing person dead body search on location and the inquiry. It was the evidence on the police station as lat two days of the report on the missing person. But, based on arthropod evidence, the man in the derelict building could not be the same man who was described missing.
As a result, the conclusion of the case are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on report, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14969693
#SPJ3
Why is the forensic interview especially important in child abuse cases? What are key tips to ensure facts gathered in the interview can withstand judicial scrutiny and why are all forensic interviews with children recorded?
Answers
Forensic interviews are especially important in child abuse cases because it enable the acquisition of factual information and evidence relating to those cases.
To ensure that facts are gathered in a way that can be proven in court, forensic interviews are carefully controlled: the interviewer's utterances and body language must be neutral, alternative explanations for a child's assertions are thoroughly explored, and the results of the interview are substantiated in a way that can be proven in court.
What is the importance of Forensic interviews?The purpose of a forensic interview is to get a statement from a kid in a way that is objective, developmental, and legally acceptable.
Child welfare officials frequently conduct these interviews in the privacy of their automobiles or vacant classrooms. These "improved" settings, while convenient, may not be perfect.
Because a person's capacity to recall past events is often impacted by his or her environment, best practice in forensic interviewing—even if it occurs "in the field"—entails establishing a neutral, comforting, and child-friendly site prior to the interview.
Learn more about Forensic Interviews:
https://brainly.com/question/15213328
#SPJ1
What are the federal law requirements relating to privilege and confidentiality and information disclosed in the NMLS for public access?
Answers
The Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS) is an online platform that allows state-licensed mortgage companies, branches, and loan originators to manage their licenses and registrations in one place.
The NMLS collects sensitive information, including personally identifiable information, financial data, and criminal records. Therefore, confidentiality and privilege are essential to maintain the privacy and security of the data.Federal law requirements relating to privilege and confidentiality and information disclosed in the NMLS for public access are set forth in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), which outlines the privacy and security requirements for financial institutions.
The law establishes strict standards for data protection, access, correction, and sharing, and mandates that financial institutions and credit reporting agencies take appropriate measures to safeguard sensitive information.
To know more about GLBA visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31662334
#SPJ11
A narrative case report consists of the following elements:
Select one:
a. Introduction, reporting party/victim statement, witness
statement(s), conclusion
b. Face sheet, witness statement(s), facts of the case,
conclusion
c. Introduction, your opinion, facts of the case, suspect
statement(s), conclusion
d. Face sheet, reporting party/victim statement, witness
statement(s), your opinion, facts of the case
e. Face sheet, introduction, reporting party/victim statement,
witness statement(s), facts of the case, suspect statement(s),
conclusion
Answers
2)Case presentation: This section describes the patient's symptoms, physical examination findings, and any diagnostic tests that were performed.
3)Diagnosis: This section presents the diagnosis or differential diagnoses based on the patient's history and examination.
4)Treatment: This section describes the treatment plan and any interventions that were performed.
5)Follow-up: This section includes information about the patient's response to treatment and any subsequent follow-up visits.
6)Discussion: This section provides a discussion of the case and its implications for clinical practice or research.
7)Conclusion: This section summarizes the key points of the case report and its importance.
It is important to note that the structure and content of a narrative case report may vary depending on the intended audience and the specific requirements of the journal or publication in which it is being submitted.
Which constitutional provision forbids conflict between state and federal laws?
Supremacy Clause
Habeas Corpus
Elastic Clause
Ex Post Facto
Explain your reasoning for choosing this answer:
Answers
Answer:
doctrine of preemption
Explanation:
Under the doctrine of preemption, which is based on the Supremacy Clause, federal law preempts state law, even when the laws conflict.Jun 2, 2017
"Supremacy Clause" constitutional provision forbids conflict between state and federal laws. Correct option is a.
The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, and it states:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties take precedence over any conflicting state laws. This ensures that there is uniformity in the application and enforcement of federal laws across all states and prevents conflicts or inconsistencies between state and federal regulations.
To know more about constitutional:
https://brainly.com/question/4555568
#SPJ6
Need this in the right order.
Answers
Hit thanks if this helped !!
Why should anyone be allowed to record information about another person without their consent?
Answers
Explanation:
i strongly believe everyone has a choice and should be informed about who shares or records his or her information. It's just weird and rude if you just share stuff about another person withing him or her knowing..unless it's a surprise party
opinion about the
extent to which the composition of Congress should reflect that of the general
population.
Answers
While there is an obvious disparity between the composition of congress and the general population, it should be noted that it is important to vote for candidates that have policies that you agree with. It would be silly to only vote for a candidate because of their race,religion, gender, etc. . While the composition of congress may not fully represent the general populous, it is important to understand that it is not necessarily a huge priority for them to represent the population perfectly. (In my personal opinion). Hope that helped!
In an ideal world, Congress would reflect the wide range of backgrounds found in the entire public.
Composition of Congress and reflect of population:People of race are underrepresented in Congress as well. Finally, young adults are a population that is underrepresented.
That being said, in the actual world, this is regrettably not the case. Women, for example, while trying to make up half of the population, are disproportionately underrepresented in Congress.
Many young Americans may be discouraged by this, as they may believe that people who representing them do not really comprehend them. While there is a clear divide between the makeup of Congress and the general people, it is critical to vote for politicians that support ideas that you believe in. It would be absurd to vote only on the basis of a candidate's ethnicity, religion, gender, or other characteristics. While the makeup of Congress may not entirely reflect the broader public, it is crucial to recognize that flawless representation of the populace is not a high priority for them.
Find out more information about 'Congress'.
https://brainly.com/question/3856177?referrer=searchResults
Freud argued that which part of our personality held out unconscious urges, desires,
and drives
id
ego
superdgo
subconscious
Answers
Answer:
Option A (id) is the correct approach.
Explanation:
The latent tends to shape our actions and perceptions, however, according to Freud, particularly but we are also ignorant of certain fundamental forces.Freud stated whether our unconscious impulses, preferences, and drives were kept by that component of our personalities but also that Id would be a component of our personalities that really can retain our unconscious impulses and impulses although Id would be an individual personality system that comprises the fundamental instinctive drives and desires of such a human being.
Answer:
A). Id
Explanation:
As per Freud's theory of personality, the part of the personality which holds our unconscious desires, instincts, and urges. It is the primitive, unconscious, and impulsive component of the human psyche that responds to our drives.
A new-born child only possesses id as it is the biological element(present since birth) and it develops the other two elements of the psyche(ego and super-ego) later as it grows. This part works primarily upon pleasure principle and wishes for immediate fulfillment of desires and failure in it brings displeasure. This element of personality ahs no affiliation to the objective reality of the world. Thus, option A is the correct answer.
How does the young man justify the group Citizens for Strength
Big sky, big money
Answers
By including youth in the design, implementation, monitoring, reporting, and evaluation of instruments, strategies, and programs, participation can be enhanced. There are a variety of strategies for increasing youth participation, such as education and capacity building.
Why is it important for young people to participate?
Positive mental health can benefit from a young person's increased sense of connectedness, belonging, and value through meaningful participation.
How can a youth group contribute to effective local governance?
The following eight major pillars should play a role in good governance: full participation, the rule of law, openness, equity based on consensus, efficiency, effectiveness, accountability, and responsiveness.
Learn more about youth here:
https://brainly.com/question/28983491
#SPJ1
Which of the following is an advantage of being a sole trader?
Select one:
a. the owner has unlimited liability
b. the business has limited life
c. the owner has total autonomy over business decisions
d. the business is not a separate legal entity
Answers
Which president signed the Community Mental Health Centers Act in order to
deinstitutionalize the mentally ill?
Answers
Answer:
Signed into law by President John F. Kennedy on October 31, 1963, the Act was the first of several federal policy changes that helped spark a major transformation of the public mental health system by shifting resources away from large institutions towards community-based mental health treatment programs
Explanation:
Hope it helps
in tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as:
Answers
In tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as "omission.
"Definition: Omission, in legal terms, is a term used to describe the failure to act when action is required. Omission means failing to act in a situation that calls for action. The person who is supposed to act in the given situation fails to act and hence the consequences of such inaction are faced. In tort law, the term omission is used to refer to the failure of one party to act or intervene in a given situation.
However, it is important to note that the omission is only punishable in law if the person had a duty to act or intervene, and if their inaction resulted in harm to another person. Thus, if a person has no duty to act or intervene, then they cannot be held liable for their inaction.
Learn more about tort law here:https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ11
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
Answers
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa