Low levels of political engagement, Texas' traditionalistic and individualistic political culture, and the state's decentralized administrative system all favor the continuation of interest group dominance in state politics.
After Reconstruction and up until the 1990s, the Democratic Party ruled Texas politics for about a century. Since the late 1960s, the Republican Party has risen to prominence in a reversal of alignments. It rose to prominence in the state's political landscape during the 1990s and has remained there ever since. By 2022, Texas will still be dominated by Republicans, with two Republican senators serving in the US Congress, Republicans holding majorities in the State House and Senate, a fully Republican Texas Supreme Court, and control of every statewide office.
The beliefs and ideals of the Republican Party are becoming more and more appealing to Texans of all backgrounds and walks of life across the state. Texas is now the largest entirely Republican state in the union, and it has an unmatched economic record as a consequence of the hard work of Texans and our conservative political philosophy. Simply put, the recent exponential expansion of the Republican Party has ushered in a new era of Texas politics, transformed Texas into an economic powerhouse, and established it as a national model of responsible, effective, and rational governance.
To learn more about traditionalistic please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/24249542
#SPJ4
If you could make any law, what law would you make, and why would you make this law?
Answer:
no racism
Explanation:
everyone should be treated equally
HURRY PLS
identify reasons critics object to the emphasis the United States puts on individual rights
Answer:
Government And Business in Voice for Reason
Explanation:
a legal citation for a court decision is used by legal professionals to research the law, and includes:
A legal citation for a court decision is used by legal professionals to research the law, and includes: "names of the parties, location of a published case, court, & decision date."
What is legal citation?It is a standard language that enables one author to refer to legal authorities with enough precision as well as generality that others can follow along.
Some key features regarding the legal citation are-
Because legal and judicial writing is so reliant on such citations, it is a language of abbreviations as well as special terms. While this encoding makes it difficult for lay readers, it accomplishes a significant reduction in the area consumed by the references, which are frequently numerous. You will understand how to pursue a line of argument directly through the numerous citations embedded in it as you gain experience reading legal writing. Nonetheless, citations are inconvenient until the reader wishes to pursue one. The fundamental tradeoff that underpins any citation system is one between providing complete information about the specifically known and avoiding plagiarism.To know more about the judicial review, here
https://brainly.com/question/14027482
#SPJ4
I am just going to get on the bus stop and get some stuff for my moms work today and then I can pay for the car and then go to get back to work at the park lol lol I got a car crash at the park today and I got it on the way north and I got it on the road test drive north north Quincy
Answer:
okok good luck lol
Explanation:
ok good luck lol
Do you think it is possible to find a balance between justice and the implementation of Ubuntu and it’s inherent ideas rehabilitative justice
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Ubuntu is the long tradition of african cultures where criminals or people that have done something wrong have to do right by the people they injured or hurt, and they have to help them healing the social tissue and restoring relationships in order to be able to go back into society.
It's a very close matter to rehabilitative justice, in the sense of wanting to restore the social tissue and helping the person get back to society as a good, productive and healthy member of the society, Ubuntu has proven to be a good method and state of mind when dealing with hurt societies by the narcotrafic and organized crime.
a antisocialble behavior order is a order That will prevent you from being antisocialble with people and choosing not To Make friends
Answer:
There are types of antisocial behaviors
Explanation:
Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD)
Borderline personality disorder (BPD)
Histrionic personality disorder.
Narcissistic personality disorder.
these are just a few
but APD or antisocial personality disorder is a mental health disorder characterized by disregard for other people.
Those with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) may begin to show symptoms in childhood, but the condition can't be diagnosed until adolescence or adulthood.
Those with antisocial personality disorder tend to lie, break laws, act impulsively, and lack regard for their own safety or the safety of others. Symptoms may lessen with age.
based on your understanding of how vetos work if congress is in session what might be a reason that President pocket vetoes a bill
Answer:
A bill may be vetoed if it goes against the declaration of independence or is unlawful.
Explanation:
Do you think sociological theories of crime causation are sound? Why or why not?
Two equal forces act in opposite directions on object A. Two unequal forces act in opposite directions on object B. If these are the only forces acting on objects A and B.
type of advance medical directive does the AMA recommend? Living will or Durable power of attorney
I need a definitive answer to this question, please
Answer:
C) Durable power of attorney
Explanation:
A Power of Attorney is a legal document that appoints an “Agent” to represent you and handle specific issues for you. Depending upon the terms of the Power of Attorney, your Agent could be authorized to make financial and health care decisions on your behalf.
How does tolerance relate to blood alcohol content (BAC)?
Tolerance relate to Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) as a person with tolerance requires a higher Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) than a non-tolerant person to experience some of the same effects.
Basically, tolerance means that your body is suppressing its normal responses to toxins.
What is Blood Alcohol Content (BAC)?Blood alcohol concentration, or BAC, is the metric used to measure the amount of alcohol in a person's bloodstream at a given time.
This alcohol content can be determined by testing the person's breath, blood, urine, or saliva, with breath testing being the most common method of testing as practiced by law enforcement.
Percentage of alcohol in a drink affects Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) level. The higher the percentage the higher the BAC. The type of alcohol, fizzy drinks are absorbed more quickly.
Hence, the answer was given and explained above.
To learn more about Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) refer:
https://brainly.com/question/4092311
#SPJ2
the supreme court of the united states ruled that the san francisco laundry licensing board had engaged in discriminatory application of the law in the case of .
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886) that the San Francisco Laundry Licensing Board had engaged in discriminatory application of the law.
In this landmark decision, the Court held that the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause applied to all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States, including non-citizens. The case involved Yick Wo, a Chinese immigrant who was denied a laundry permit based on a city ordinance, which the Licensing Board had disproportionately applied against Chinese immigrants. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Yick Wo, concluding that the discriminatory application of the ordinance violated the Equal Protection Clause. This decision set a significant precedent in ensuring equal protection of the laws for all individuals, regardless of citizenship or ethnicity.
To learn more about Supreme Court, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29604190
#SPJ11
in a criminal trial the prosecutor called a witness to the stand to authenticate the voice in a tape recording as the defendant's. the only other time the witness had heard the defendant's voice was after his arrest. assuming a proper foundation has been laid, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice? group of answer choices
Yes, as the witness is now accustomed to the voice of the defendant.
In a trial, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice?
The witness can accurately confirm it because she is familiar with the defendant's voice at this point. Anybody who is familiar with the voice of the purported speaker may verify a voice recording by identifying the speaker. As a result, the witness can comment on whether the voice on the video is actually that of the defendant because she is now accustomed to hearing it.
As circumstantial evidence, the accused's actions either before or after the crime are extremely important. The circumstantial evidence in front of the court allows it to deduce facts and draw a conclusion.
Expert testimony is only appropriate in cases where the trier of fact would benefit from the expert's knowledge in order to appreciate the evidence or determine the fact at issue.
To know more about circumstantial evidence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ4
whats the reason of traffica laws
Answer:
The reason of traffic laws is to protect you and other people in the streets and to have a proper line of vehicles in the road to avoid accidents.
What is your opinion on the recent voter bill? Do you believe Washington D.C. should be a state? Do you think anyone including those without identification be able to vote.
Answer:
yes I do think washington should be a state
Explanation:
I say this because there are a total of 50 states and if we take washington out it would be 49 and it doesnt make any sense to take washington out
Throughout the year, Supreme Court justices review cases that have been appealed to the Court. When a session begins, the justices select a handful of cases to more fully review and decide. For each selected case, lawyers for both parties are allowed to make public arguments in an attempt to sway the justices and address their questions. The justices then deliberate and argue the facts of the case. They produce opinions, which can include majority, dissenting, and concurring opinions. The justices vote on which opinion they support, and the opinion with the most votes becomes the final verdict.
Which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process?
A. The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it.
B. Justices do not vote on particular opinions, but rather on the final ruling.
C. Lawyers are not allowed to attempt to influence the justice's opinions in any way.
D. Only appellate court judges are charged with writing dissenting opinions.
The statement that best summarizes the inaccuracies contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process is that the Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it. Hence, Option A is correct.
What is the Supreme Court?The court, which is the highest court in the United States, is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases and the cases that are over state courts are looked after by the Supreme Court.
Any opinion, whether it is of the majority, dissenting or the final court decision, is expressed after hearing arguments from both the parties. They constitute the ruling of the Supreme Court over the case.
According to the given paragraph The Supreme Court firstly reaches a decision and then hears the parts, which is wrong. It is the duty of the Supreme court to hear any case that is appealed to it.
Therefore, Option A: The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it is correct.
Learn more about Supreme court from here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ2
Q2. A company issued 5% redeemable preference shares with a face of GH14,000 at a discount of GH3,000. A transaction cost of GH201 was incurred. The note will be redeemed in 5 years for GH11,760. The effective interest rate is 8%. Required: What will be shown in the income statement and the statement of financial position for the years 1-5?
In the income statement of financial position, the preference shares will be shown as a liability at the carrying value of GH3,316.76.
What will be Shown on the Income Statement?To answer this question, we need to calculate the accounting entries for each of the 5 years using the effective interest rate method. The effective interest rate is 8%, which means that each year the company will have to recognize interest expense of 8% on the carrying value of the preference shares.
Year 1
The carrying value of the preference shares at the beginning of the year is:
Face value - Discount + Transaction cost = GH14,000 - GH3,000 + GH201 = GH11,201
Interest expense for the year is 8% of the carrying value:
GH11,201 x 8% = GH896.08
The company will need to recognize GH896.08 as interest expense in the income statement and reduce the carrying value of the preference shares by that amount:
Redemption value - Face value = GH11,760 - GH14,000 = GH-2,240
Preference shares carrying value at the end of the year:
GH11,201 + GH896.08 - GH2,240 = GH9,857.08
In the statement of financial position, the preference shares will be shown as a liability at the carrying value of GH9,857.08.
Year 2
Carrying value of preference shares at the beginning of the year:
GH9,857.08
Interest expense for the year:
GH9,857.08 x 8% = GH788.57
Preference shares carrying value at the end of the year:
GH9,857.08 + GH788.57 - GH2,240 = GH8,405.65
In the statement of financial position, the preference shares will be shown as a liability at the carrying value of GH8,405.65.
Year 3
Carrying value of preference shares at the beginning of the year:
GH8,405.65
Interest expense for the year:
GH8,405.65 x 8% = GH672.45
Preference shares carrying value at the end of the year:
GH8,405.65 + GH672.45 - GH2,240 = GH6,838.10
In the statement of financial position, the preference shares will be shown as a liability at the carrying value of GH6,838.10.
Year 4
Carrying value of preference shares at the beginning of the year:
GH6,838.10
Interest expense for the year:
GH6,838.10 x 8% = GH547.05
Preference shares carrying value at the end of the year:
GH6,838.10 + GH547.05 - GH2,240 = GH5,145.15
In the statement of financial position, the preference shares will be shown as a liability at the carrying value of GH5,145.15.
Year 5
Carrying value of preference shares at the beginning of the year:
GH5,145.15
Interest expense for the year:
GH5,145.15 x 8% = GH411.61
Preference shares carrying value at the end of the year:
GH5,145.15 + GH411.61 - GH2,240 = GH3,316.76
In the statement of financial position, the preference shares will be shown as a liability at the carrying value of GH3,316.76.
On the year of redemption, the preference shares will be removed from the statement of financial position as they will be redeemed at their face value of GH14,000. In the income statement, the company will recognize any gain or loss on redemption, which will be the difference between the face value and the carrying value of the preference shares.
Learn more about income statement here: https://brainly.com/question/28936505
#SPJ1
5. Is Carl Lee Hailey sane...or insane? After deciding, explain the reasons for your choice.
Answer:
I believe that Carl Lee Hailey was sane, just that he was overcome by rage because of his daughter's abduction. Even though he was acquitted due to insanity, that was only due to his brother's attorney's quick thinking.
Explanation:
Criminologists from the consensus perspective maintain all of the following EXCEPT:
a. where differences between groups exist, law is the neutral mechanism that helps individuals resolve their conflicts
b. law reflects the need for social order
c. law is a product of value consensus
d. law is a partial system that protects private interests
Answer & Explanation:
The statement that criminologists from the consensus perspective maintain that "law is a partial system that protects private interests" is not accurate. Criminologists from the consensus perspective generally argue that law is a neutral mechanism that helps individuals resolve conflicts, reflects the need for social order, and is a product of value consensus. They do not typically view law as a partial system that exclusively protects private interests.
Criminologists from the consensus perspective maintain all of the following EXCEPT:
d. law is a partial system that protects private interests.
The consensus perspective emphasizes that laws are created based on a general agreement and shared values in society, focusing on the role of law in maintaining social order. Therefore, options a, b, and c align with this perspective, while option d does not, as it suggests a bias in the legal system favoring private interests.
From the consensus perspective, criminologists maintain that law reflects the need for social order and is a product of value consensus. However, they do not believe that law is a neutral mechanism that helps individuals resolve their conflicts or that it is a partial system that protects private interests. Instead, they argue that law is a universal set of rules and norms that promote social cohesion and regulate individual behavior. In their view, the criminal justice system should aim to prevent crime and rehabilitate offenders, rather than solely punishing them. This approach emphasizes the importance of community involvement and social intervention in addressing the root causes of criminal behavior.
To know more about private interests visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29765850
#SPJ11
Security incident indicators that deserve special attention from users and/ or system administrators include
Security incident indicators that deserve aspecial attention administrators include when the system unexpectedly crashes without clear reasons and when new user accounts are mysteriously created which bypass standard procedures.
What are Security incident indicators?A Security incident indicators refers to indicator that signifies that a security has been compromised or have been in process of being compromised.
In conclusion, the Security incident indicators that deserve aspecial attention administrators include when the system unexpectedly crashes without clear reasons and when new user accounts are mysteriously created which bypass standard procedures.
Read more about Security incident indicators
brainly.com/question/25164014
Do defense teams have the ability to mount a defense against evidence? What affects their ability?
Answer:
Here's a sample answer:)
No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.
where did fallon see damage in the brain when he looked at the brains of phycopathic killers
Fallon noticed that each phycopathic killer had damage to their orbital cortex, which is right above the eyes, the orbits, and also the interior part of the temporal lobe.
A lack of interpersonal empathy and an inability to feel pity or remorse also characterize psychopathic serial killers. They do not value human life and do not care about the consequences of their crimes. They are callous, indifferent, and extremely brutal in their interactions with their victims.
The factors that Fallon suggests creates psychopathic killers are the interaction of genes, what's called the epigenetic effects, brain damage, and the environment that the psychopathic killer was in or had been in. Each killer had damage to their orbital cortex, which is right above the eyes, the orbits, and also the interior part of the temporal lobe. They all also have the MAO-A gene.
Therefore, the phycopathic killers had damage in the orbital cortex of their brain.
To learn more on phycopathic killers, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14992577
#SPJ1
The long-term damage done by heavy drinking or drug use is ...
A. obviously visible.
B. not usually visible.
C. negligible.
The damage done by heavy drinking or drug use is obviously visible in long-term .
What are the effects of heavy drinking?Digestion issues liver illness,heart related disease, stroke and High BP(Blood Pressure) .Cancer of the rectum, liver, colon, mouth, throat, esophagus, and breast. Deterioration of Immune system increases the chances of getting sick. Issues with memory and learning, including dementia, and poor academic performance.How sometimes drug is useful ?High cholesterol and high BP(Blood Pressure) are the two conditions which can be managed through drug medications . These medications can slow down its few long-term harmful effects on the human body. Among the most crucial medications (or vaccines) are Vaccinations .Drug usage is obviously for recreational purposes, and it has known to provide short-term physical benefits.To know more about Drugs visit
https://brainly.com/question/4920246
#SPJ1
criminal law may be classified into which two major categories?
Answer:
Criminal law is classified into two major categories: substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law.
Criminal law can be classified into two major categories: substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law.
Substantive criminal law defines the types of conduct that are considered crimes and sets out the punishment for those crimes.
It is concerned with the substantive elements of a crime, such as the mental state and the physical act that must be proven in order to establish criminal liability. Substantive criminal law also specifies the defenses that may be raised to a criminal charge and the circumstances under which a defendant may be held criminally responsible.
Procedural criminal law, on the other hand, deals with the process by which criminal cases are handled in the criminal justice system.
It establishes the rules and procedures that must be followed by law enforcement officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, and juries in the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of criminal cases.
Procedural criminal law also protects the constitutional rights of criminal defendants, such as the right to a fair trial, the right to remain silent, and the right to an attorney.
To know more about Criminal law refer to-
brainly.com/question/1205493#
#SPJ11
Information from the Human Genome Project will:
A.all of the them.
B.help to reveal the role and implications of evolution
C.be useful for diagnosing and treating genetic diseases.
D.reveal the location of a gene on a particular chromosome.
Answer:
the answer is option D. Reveal the location of a gene on a particular chromosome.
Hope this helps you, if my answer was helpful can you give me a brainliest it will really help me and thank you have a nice day!
An activist is protesting against her government. She claims that politicians are allowed to commit crimes without being arrested or put in trial. She demands that politicians should be treated exactly the same as other citizens in the legal system which idea is the activist promoting .
A.Speration of power
B.Rule of law
C.Representative democracy
D.Checks and balances
Answer:
D.Checks and balances
Explanation:
__________________
She demands that politicians should be treated exactly the same as other citizens in the legal system, she is promoting the Rule of law. The correct option is b.
The activist is pushing for the rule of the law. The idea that all people, including politicians should be subject to and bound by the same set of laws and legal procedures is upheld by the rule of law. It emphasizes the lack of any special privileges or exemptions based on a person's position or status and the equality and accountability of all citizens before the law.
The activist is promoting a fair and just system that ensures equality due process and the accountability of those in power by calling for politicians to be treated equally to other citizens in the legal system. This encourages openness, honesty and the defense of individual rights in a democracy.
learn more about rule of the law here
brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ2
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
The meaning of Threat of power
how is federalism seen throughtout the judical branch?
Answer:
interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed
Explanation:
The judiciary is such a body that interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed. Besides, in federal states, disputes between the Centre and States are common and natural. The judiciary also resolves the disputes between the Centre and States as well as between the States.
Joe hires Sam and Toby to paint his barn. Sam decides it would be easier to paint the top of the barn by climbing up a nearby tree and jumping on the roof of the barn. Sam falls out of the tree and hurts a passer-by. As a general rule, under the law of agency, Joe is liable to the passer-by for:
Answer: nothing; because Sam is an independent contractor.
Explanation:
Under the law of agency, an agency is created when an authority is delegated from one individual to another individual whereby such person is appointed to do a particular job.
Based on the information given, Joe is not liable liable to the passer-by because Sam is an independent contractor as he was contracted to Casey out a task. If he was an employee of Joe, then he will be liable.