Accurate Statements : Whether or not an eyewitness is certain they can identify a culprit usually has no bearing on their accuracy.
Who is a witness?A witness can be regarded as a person who possesses information about an issue, whether they have sensed it or are testifying on behalf of another witness, in court. In the law, a witness is someone who, freely or under duress, offers testimonial evidence—either oral or written—of what they know or claim to know.
In a legal action, a witness may be required to testify in court, before a grand jury, an administrative tribunal, before a deposition officer, or in a number of other settings. A subpoena is a legal instrument that requires someone to show up for a hearing. It is employed in court to force a witness' testimony.
Inaccurate Statement: Witnesses are less accurate than those who take more time when identifying suspects from images or a lineup.Eyewitnesses are more adept at identifying criminals when they can precisely describe the specifics of the crime scene.Witnesses' ability to correctly identify the criminal is improved when they contribute to the creation of a face composite..To know more about, witness, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/23012710
#SPJ1
Some early methods of execution included all of the follow except?
Answer:
i have to see the question more explain please.
Explanation:
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Allison is a forensic entomologist. Which two methods are available to her to determine the time of death at a crime scene?
Allison studies the life cycle of insects at a crime scene. She uses two methods available to determine the cause of death. She uses
the
method when she studies the different types of insects around the body. She uses the
method when she focuses specifically on the eggs of the blowfly.
Y
Answer:
succesional wave of insects
maggot age
Explanation:
As a forensic entomologist, Allison will use the two methods, like studying the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene and studying the different types of insects around the body.
What does a forensic entomologist do?A forensic entomologist is one who is involved in the study of insects, and their anatomy and physiology, while reporting their investigation in case of a crime.
In the above example, Allison as a forensic entomologist shall be involved in using the two methods like the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene, and all the kinds of insects that were present around the body.
Hence, option A and C are the two most suitable methods that will be the focus of Allison as a forensic entomologist, and a report of her studies shall be forwarded to the investigating authorities.
Learn more about forensic entomologist here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act, which required states to retrofit public areas to be wheelchair accessible, without offering any federal funds to pay for it. This is an example of which of the following?
Correct Answer(s)
-an unfunded mandate
-federal preemption
-coercive federalism
Incorrect Answer(s)
-a categorical grant
-a block grant
The Americans with Disabilities Act prevents discrimination and guarantees job opportunities for people with disabilities. It is an example of coercive federalism.
In 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted into law. A civil rights statute known as the Americans with Disabilities Act forbids discrimination against people with disabilities in all aspects of social life, including employment, education, transport, and all governmental and private locations that are accessible to the general public. Making sure that people with disability have the same opportunities and rights as everyone else is the goal of the legislation. A phase of American federalism known as coercive federalism started in the late 1960s. It is distinguished by a significant increase in the federal government's power in comparison to the states, as well as by the federal government's ability to supersede state authority and impose federal policies on the states. In spite of the fact that cooperative and the dual federalism are still present in the federal system, the phrase refers to the predominate pattern of federal-state relations, particularly in terms of policymaking.
Learn more about coercive federalism here
https://brainly.com/question/28902846
#SPJ4
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.
What informs firearms and their projectiles?Firearms and their projectiles can provide a wealth of information to investigators and forensic experts in criminal investigations, as well as to engineers and researchers studying the performance and characteristics of firearms.
From a firearm, one can determine its make, model, and caliber. The firearm's serial number can also be used to trace its ownership and history. The condition of the firearm can provide information about its maintenance and use.
From the projectile, one can determine the caliber, type of bullet, and the angle of impact. The projectile's trajectory can be used to determine the location of the shooter and the direction of the shot.
Forensic experts can also analyze the gunshot residue left on the firearm and the shooter's hands to determine if the person fired the weapon. The presence of fingerprints or DNA on the firearm can also be used to identify the shooter.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.
learn more about Firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/30244650
#SPJ1
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is:
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is Debra P. v. Turlington.
The case was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 1984. In Debra P. v. Turlington, a group of Florida high school students challenged the state's minimum competency examinations program, arguing that it violated their right to equal protection under the law. The students claimed that the testing program was not connected to the state's curriculum and that it unfairly penalized students who had not received instruction on the topics covered by the test.
The court agreed with the students and held that there must be a "rational nexus" between the testing program and the state's curriculum. The court noted that the purpose of the testing program was to ensure that students had acquired the basic skills and knowledge necessary to function as citizens, and that this goal could only be achieved if the testing program was based on the state's curriculum.
The court's decision in Debra P. v. Turlington set an important precedent in the development of educational law in the United States. It established that minimum competency examinations must be connected to the curriculum and that states must ensure that all students have access to the instruction necessary to succeed on these exams. The decision also highlighted the importance of equal protection under the law in the context of education and helped to ensure that all students have equal opportunities to succeed in school.
To learn more about competency examinations, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31646918
#SPJ4
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is ___________
what is police form and how does it help the world and the people?
curtis is driving a golf cart in the pebble creek subdivision. his phone rings and he looks down for a second and does not see kara who is jogging along the road. curtis runs into kara who falls and breaks her hip. kara files suit against curtis for negligence. what type of damages can kara seek?
Kara can seek damages for her physical injuries, medical expenses, emotional distress, pain and suffering, loss of income, and property damage.
In a negligence lawsuit, the court will consider the degree of fault attributed to each party and the amount of damages that are appropriate for the injured party's suffering. In this case, since Curtis was driving the golf cart and chose to look down at his phone without considering the safety of others, he can be found negligent.
Therefore, Kara can seek damages for the harm caused by Curtis’s negligence. Depending on the circumstances, Kara may also be able to seek punitive damages as well.
To know more about lawsuit, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
the empirical rule tells the approximate percentage of the data which falls into certain ranges. to which distributions does the empirical rule apply?
The empirical rule (also called the "68-95-99.7 rule") is a guideline for how records is allotted in a everyday distribution. The rule states that (approximately): - 68% of the statistics points will fall inside one wellknown deviation of the mean. - 95% of the facts points will fall within two fashionable deviations of the mean.
What distributions does the empirical rule practice to?The empirical rule applies to a regular distribution. In a regular distribution, truely all records falls within three general deviations of the mean. The mean, mode, and median are all equal. The suggest is the common of all of the numbers in the data set.
What does the empirical rule measure?The empirical rule, or the 68-95-99.7 rule, tells you where most of the values lie in a everyday distribution: Around 68% of values are within 1 general deviation of the mean. Around 95% of values are within 2 trendy deviations of the mean. Around 99.7% of values are within three widespread deviations of the mean.
Learn more about empirical rule apply here;
https://brainly.com/question/10093236
#SPJ4
suppose you wanted to poll citizens of the u.s. and canada to estimate the number of people who caught covid19 in 2021. you do this by first estimating the percentage of population with covid19 and then multiplying that estimate by the population of each country. the u.s. has a population of about 328 million, while canada has a population of about 38 million. other things being equal, how many people would you need to poll in each country so that your level of accuracy in number of people with covid19 was comparable between the two countries? group of answer choices A. more information is needed. B. you should poll the same number of people in the u.s. and canada
C.. you should poll more people in canada. D. you should poll more people in the u.s.
C. You should poll more people in Canada.
Should the number of people polled differ?To estimate the number of people who caught COVID-19 in the U.S. and Canada in 2021, the accuracy of the estimation depends on the percentage of the population surveyed. Since the population of the U.S. is significantly larger than that of Canada, it is necessary to poll a larger number of people in Canada to achieve a comparable level of accuracy between the two countries.
In this scenario, the U.S. has a population of approximately 328 million, while Canada has a population of around 38 million. When estimating the percentage of the population with COVID-19, sampling a fixed number of individuals in each country would result in a larger relative sample size in the U.S. compared to Canada.
To ensure a comparable level of accuracy in estimating the number of people with COVID-19 in both countries, it is necessary to poll a larger number of people in Canada. This compensates for the smaller population size and helps minimize the potential margin of error in the estimation. By doing so, the statistical representation of the surveyed individuals becomes more proportional to the population, increasing the reliability of the estimated percentages.
Learn more about Sample size determination
brainly.com/question/11129327
#SPJ11
You are a contract manager for ABC Construction Co. ABC receives an invitation from John, a landowner, to submit a bid for building a new skyscraper on his property. You reply to the invitation and submit your best terms which you believe delivers higher quality at a lower price than your competitors. That same day, you receive an email from Zappo Electrical Inc. offering to support an ABC construction project for $20,000. Zappo states, "I'm sure we can provide you the best service. If I don't hear from you in three days that means you want to work with us." You do not reply to the email, and three days later Zappo emails again, "Glad we have a contract and I look forward to working with you shortly." Does ABC have a contract with John or Zappo Electrical Inc.? Explain your answer.
Answer:
neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers
brad and mariah are partners in doctors for children, a medical clinic. brad’s dissociation from the firm results in
Brad's dissociation from the firm results in the automatic termination of the firm's legal existence.
Other partnership's buyout of Brad's interest in the firm the immediate maturity of all partnership debts the temporary suspension of the partnership's business.
A partnership is a kind of business where a formal agreement between two or more people is made who agree to be the co-owners, distribute responsibilities for running an organization and share the income or losses that the business generates.
Hence, Brad's dissociation will automatic terminate the firm's legal existence.
Learn more about dissociation here:
https://brainly.com/question/32674500
#SPJ1
examples of writ of prohibition
What can officers do to maintain effective communication during emergency situations
Answer:
Explanation:
In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.
if a country's laws related to intellectual property rights are weak, then firms with valuable technologies will be reluctant to bring them into that country. t/f
Answer:
True
Explanation:
If a country's laws related to intellectual property rights are weak, firms with valuable technologies may be reluctant to bring them into that country. Without strong intellectual property protections, the firms' technologies and innovations may be vulnerable to theft or copying, which could undermine the firms' ability to profit from their investments in research and development. This could discourage the firms from investing in the country, or lead them to invest less in research and development. Strong intellectual property rights protections are therefore an important factor in encouraging innovation and economic growth.
What are the options when a bill to be signed comes before the president? The president can sign or veto it, the president can hold a press conference about it , or the president can call for a vote on it
Answer:
The president can sign or veto it.
Explanation:
Although the president will also have a press conference, this will not be until after he decides to either sign the bill into law, or use his executive power to deny the bill (veto); sending it back to congress.
The Bill Is Sent to the President
When a consignment reaches the President, he has three choices. He can: Sign and omit the bill—the bill becomes a law. Refuse to sign, or veto, the bill—the consignment is sent again to the U.S. House of Representatives, along with the President's motives for the veto.
What selections can be taken if the President vetoes a bill?If the President vetoes the bill, it is back to the congressional chamber in which it originated; that chamber may additionally strive to override the president's veto, even though a profitable override vote requires the assist of two-thirds of these voting.
Learn more about Bill to the president here:
https://brainly.com/question/26039671#SPJ13Tổng quát về hoạt động lập pháp của Singapore. So sánh với hoạt động lập
pháp của Việt Nam.
Answer:
I'm sorry don't know about this
The ______ enforces federal environmental statutes, while _______ enforces workplace safety regulations.
Answer: EPA, OSHA
Explanation:
Shondra is a comptroller and has worked at both the local and state level in this position. She has been able to retain her same membership in the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees regardless of the level she worked at. Shondra is a member of a(n) _____ union.industrial
Shondra is member of an industrial union if she has worked at both local and state level in this position.
What is an industrial union?Workers in Finland's light and heavy industries are represented by the Industrial Union, a trade union. On January 1, 2018, the Industrial Union TEAM combined with the Metalworkers' Union and the Wood and Allied Workers' Union to form the union. It joined the Central Organization of Finnish Trade Unions, much like its forerunners. The Industrial Federation's representatives expressed their optimism that the Paperworkers' Union will join within a few years despite the union's decision to opt out of the merger that created it. The building and woodworkers' international, the International Association of food, agricultural, hotel, restaurant, catering, tobacco other allied workers' associations, and the UNI Worldwide Union are the four global union federations to which the union belongs.
To learn more about state, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20372541
#SPJ4
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Answer:
B
Explanation:
which recently fired cable news host received a cease-and-desist order from his former employer
Fox News has reportedly fired cable news host received a cease-and-desist order from his former employer
What is the cable newsFox News told Tucker Carlson to stop promoting his show on Twt after they fired him.
Cable news means news channels on TV that come through cable or satellite TV. These TV channels show news all the time. They have people talking about different things like politics, sports, and entertainment. Sometimes they even show things happening right then and there.
Read more about cable news here:
https://brainly.com/question/29924868
#SPJ1
What are the significance of the NAPOLCOM in the operation of the PNP
Answer:
Explanation:
The National Police Commission abbreviated as NAPOLCOM, is an attached agency of the Department of the Interior and Local Government responsible for the administration and control of the Philippine National Police (PNP).6975 and 8551 to administer and control the Philippine National Police, the DILG “ for the purpose of effectively discharging the functions prescribe in the "To exercise administrative control and operational supervision over the PNP.
plz mark as brainliest
What is the three-word phrase used to indicate that a body of congress shall approve or deny treaties and nominations for ambassadors, public ministers, and judges?.
The three-word expression used to describe whether a congressional body will approve or deny treaties and nominations for ambassadors, public ministers, and judges are senate, advice and consent.
What does advice and the consent of senate means?In the United States, the term "advice and consent" refers to the Senate's authority to consult with and approve the president's nominations to public positions, such as those of Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, officers of the armed forces, US attorneys, ambassadors, and other lesser posts. This authority is shared by several state senates, which discuss with and approve the governor's appointments of state department heads, judges, and other statewide authorities (in some states).Learn more about the Constitution of US with the help of the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/838122
#SPJ4
Which of the following is NOT a result of Gregg v. Georgia (1976) and its companion cases?
A) The sentence of death has been made mandatory for certain types of murder.
B) All death sentences must be reviewed by state supreme courts.
C) Bifurcated proceedings are used in all capital trials.
D) Jurors are instructed to weigh aggravating and mitigating factors during the penalty
phase.
In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled in 1976 that juries could still impose the death penalty if they were given parameters to consider.
What was the result of Gregg v Georgia?In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty was acceptable if jurors had rules to follow when deciding sentencing. This decision was made in 1976. Several states completely abolished the death sentence as a result of the Furman v. Georgia ruling.
However, the Court later delivered a number of cases in which it was held that if a judge makes factual determinations (such as those regarding the existence of aggravating circumstances) upon which a death sentence is based, the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial is infringed.
With its ruling in Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court revived the constitutionality of state death penalty legislation. Since 1972, a moratorium had been in effect but was now lifted.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B) All death sentences must be reviewed by state supreme courts.
To learn more about Gregg v Georgia refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29547080
#SPJ1
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
What does choosing a legal career involve? write a 250 word essay that describes your perception of the effort and study necessary to begin a career in law, and what the first year in your new career might be like.
The essay on what it entails in choosing a legal career is given below.
Choosing a legal career
A career in law requires commitment, reason, and attention. It is not simple to choose a career in law since, in addition to the opportunities, there is the weight of being a part of one of the most significant and prominent professions in society.
The practical benefit of knowing what you want from your career is that it will help you make better applications. Early on, you can start to customize your job experience, and any recruiter you work with later on will be able to see how well you know yourself.
The world is full of interesting and brand-new challenges every day. Both the cerebral and physical stimulus offered by this area of work are great. Every minute that presents a problem that needs to be solved is an opportunity for me to develop intellectually, learn something new, and become a better person as well as a lawyer.
Therefore, I chose family law because I value variety in my work. I like the thought that one day I might be in court, the next I might be looking over a complicated trust document, and the next I might be interacting with a distressed client.
Learn more about legal career from
https://brainly.com/question/19919946
#SPJ1
Who is the commander in chief of the
U.S. military forces?
Answer:
Explanation:
The question has been raised as to whether the President is Commander in Chief of the Air Force established as a separate branch of the National Military? It is clear that the President is Commander in Chief of all the armed forces of the United States comprised within the national military establishment—the Air. Force as well as the Army and the Navy. Under the Constitution, the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy is the supreme military commander charged with the responsibility of protecting and defending the United States. The phrase “Army and Navy” is used in the Constitution as a means of describing all the armed forces of the United States. The fact that one branch of the armed forces is called the “Air Force,” a name not known when the Constitution was adopted, and the fact that the Congress has seen fit to separate the air arm of our armed forces from the land and sea arms cannot detract from the President’s authority as
Commander in Chief of all the armed forces : HAROLD I. BAYNTON
Acting Assistant to the Attorney General
xplain whether you believe the Supreme Court would deem a school football coach leading his team in a prayer as constitutional or unconstitutional? Be sure to site examples and parts of the Constitution to support your opinion.
Nothing in this Constitution should be interpreted as forbidding private or collective prayer in public institutions like schools. No one shall be compelled to attend prayer by the United States or by any State.
What impact did the Supreme Court's ruling in Engel v. Vitale, as stated in the headline, have?The Court determined that because laws establishing religion are prohibited by the constitution, the government had no business creating official prayers for any group of people to recite as part of a government-sponsored religious programme.
A religion cannot be "established" by the government per the Establishment Clause. The word "establishment" is not clearly defined. In the past, it meant that state-sponsored churches like the Church of England were forbidden.
To know more about Supreme Court, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/18309294
#SPJ1
What is generally true regarding insured who have have been giving classified as preferred risks
hotspot - for each of the following statements, select yes if the statement is true. otherwise, select no. note: each correct selection is worth one point. hot area:
The correct response to the above questions is given as follows;
One must be aware that Platform as a Service (PaaS) is a cloud computing model that provides a platform for users to develop, run, and manage applications without the need to worry about the underlying infrastructure.
PaaS providers typically offer a development environment, tools, and infrastructure resources such as servers, storage, and networking, which can be accessed over the internet. Users can build, test, and deploy applications on the PaaS platform, and the provider takes care of the maintenance, security, and scaling of the underlying infrastructure.
Learn more about PaaS:
https://brainly.com/question/20600180
#SPJ1
Full Question:
HOTSPOT
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.
A platform as a service (PaaS) solution that hosts web apps in Azure provides full control of the operating systems that host applications.
A platform as a service (PaaS) solution that hosts web apps in Azure provides the ability to scale the platform automatically
A platform as a service (PaaS) solution that hosts web apps in Azure provides professional development services to continuously add features to custom applications.
Should police chiefs be appointed or elected? Explain your answer.