If the opposing party has a simple majority in Congress, they may choose to refuse to accept the veto describes a consideration presidents face when deciding whether or not to issue a veto.
What is VETO?
VETO stands for "veto power" and is the power of a person or body to reject or forbid a decision or proposal made by another. In many countries, the president or head of state has the power to veto laws passed by the legislature. In the United States, the president has the power to veto any bill passed by Congress.In politics, a veto is the power of a head of state, such as a president, to reject a decision or proposal made by a legislative body. The power of veto can be absolute, as in a monarchy, or limited, as in a democracy.
What does Democracy mean?
Democracy is a system of government in which individuals have power and can practice it directly or through elected members.It is based on the principles of respect for individual rights, free and fair elections, majority rule, and the protection of minority rights.In a democracy, citizens have the right to vote for representatives and hold them accountable for their actions. Governments are elected by citizens through regular, free, and fair elections. All citizens are equal before the law and have the right to participate in the political process and to have their voices heard.
To know more about Democracy,
https://brainly.com/question/73641
#SPJ4
8-10 sentences that answer the who, what, where, when
and why and the impact of the document (use your notes
& other resources)
PLEASE GIVE ME THE ANSWER WILL CROWN BRAINIEST!!!!
Answer:
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
First public reading of the Declaration
The first public reading of the Declaration of Independence occurred at high noon on July 8, 1776, in the Old State House yard in Philadelphia (what is now Independence Hall).
So begins the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. But what was the Declaration? Why do Americans continue to celebrate its public announcement as the birthday of the United States, July 4, 1776? While that date might just mean a barbecue and fireworks to some today, what did the Declaration mean when it was written in the summer of 1776?
On the one hand, the Declaration was a formal LEGAL DOCUMENT that announced to the world the reasons that led the thirteen colonies to separate from the British Empire. Much of the Declaration sets forth a list of abuses that were blamed on King George III. One charge levied against the King sounds like a Biblical plague: "He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance."
The Declaration was not only legalistic, but practical too. Americans hoped to get financial or military support from other countries that were traditional enemies of the British. However, these legal and pragmatic purposes, which make up the bulk of the actual document, are not why the Declaration is remembered today as a foremost expression of the ideals of the Revolution.
The Declaration's most famous sentence reads: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Even today, this inspirational language expresses a profound commitment to human equality.
This ideal of equality has certainly influenced the course of American history. Early women's rights activists at SENECA FALLS in 1848 modeled their "DECLARATION OF SENTIMENTS" in precisely the same terms as the Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths to be self-evident," they said, "that all men and women are created equal." Similarly, the African-American anti-slavery activist DAVID WALKER challenged white Americans in 1829 to "See your Declaration Americans!!! Do you understand your own language?" Walker dared America to live up to its self-proclaimed ideals. If all men were created equal, then why was slavery legal?
The ideal of full human equality has been a major legacy (and ongoing challenge) of the Declaration of Independence. But the signers of 1776 did not have quite that radical an agenda. The possibility for sweeping social changes was certainly discussed in 1776. For instance, ABIGAIL ADAMS suggested to her husband John Adams that in the "new Code of Laws" that he helped draft at the Continental Congress, he should, "Remember the Ladies, and be more generous and favorable to them." It didn't work out that way.
King George III
King George III showed signs of madness. He likely suffered from porphyria, a disease of the blood leading to gout and mental derangement.
Thomas Jefferson provides the classic example of the contradictions of the Revolutionary Era. Although he was the chief author of the Declaration, he also owned slaves, as did many of his fellow signers. They did not see full human equality as a positive social goal. Nevertheless, Jefferson was prepared to criticize slavery much more directly than most of his colleagues. His original draft of the Declaration included a long passage that condemned King George for allowing the slave trade to flourish. This implied criticism of slavery — a central institution in early American society — was deleted by a vote of the CONTINENTAL CONGRESS before the delegates signed the Declaration.
So what did the signers intend by using such idealistic language? Look at what follows the line, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS."
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness
Explanation:
What push factors means?
Poverty, a lack of social mobility, violence, or persecution are examples of push factors—reasons why people would leave their own countries.
What is meant by push and pull factors?Push factors, such as poverty, a lack of social mobility, violence, or persecution, characterize the causes that people may emigrate from their own countries. The causes for someone to choose to live in a certain nation are known as pull factors. Higher salaries, social services like health care or education, or fuzzier ideas like equality or freedom are popular examples of push factors.
Within nations, rural-to-urban migration was modeled using push and pull forces by economist Michael Todaro.
Learn more about push and pull factors, from:
brainly.com/question/18831390
#SPJ4
can someone plz check my answer My answer is B THE FIRST PERSON WHO ANSWERS THIS I WILL TRY TO GIVE A BRAIN LIST BUT NO PROMISES+a thank u and 5 stars
Where are moderate climates generally found?
in low latitudes
*in middle latitudes
near Earth’s poles
high in the mountains
Answer:
I think you are right.
Explanation:
The concept of scarcity balances unliimited wants with limited _____________?
a
Allocations
b
Choices
c
Goods
d
Resources
Answer:
c
Explanation:
good because when i read the question i exaxply knew it was good without even looking at the answers and i think that will help or if it doesnt i am sorry
10. What is meant by "It needs to be understood that a prince, and especially a prince
recently installed, cannot observe all those qualities which make men good, and it is often
necessary in order to preserve the state to act contrary to faith, contrary to mercy,
contrary to humaneness, and contrary to religion."?
This quotation is from Niccol Machiavelli's "The Prince," a political treatise written in the 16th century. It implies that the conduct of a ruler, particularly one who has recently assumed authority, may not necessarily correspond to popularly accepted moral or ethical norms.
What is the rationale of the above answer?According to Machiavelli, the first goal of a ruler should be the preservation and stability of the state. To do this, a ruler may be required to act in ways that are not always regarded good or right, such as going against faith, mercy, humaneness, and religion.
He further positied that the ruler should put the well-being and stability of the state over personal morality, even if this involves engaging in behaviors that are considered immoral or unethical by traditional standards. The phrase emphasizes that in order to defend the state, it is sometimes necessary to go against established ideals and ideas.
Learn mroe about The Prince:
https://brainly.com/question/29761992?
#SPJ1
Which is the newest monotheistic faith?
As per class discussion and the assigned course packet reading, which of the following statements is true of multiple regression?
(1) Using a regression model to "isolate" or "adjust for" variables is an experimental process, i.e. one that involves manipulating the variable of interest while holding others constant.
(2) Using regression to isolate a partial relationship can usually produce study results that offer even stronger evidence of causality than the level of evidence that we expect from a randomized controlled trial.
(3) A confounder is some variable that is correlated with both the response variable and a predictor variable.
As per the class discussion and the assigned course packet reading, the true statement regarding multiple regression is: (3) A confounder is some variable that is correlated with both the response variable and a predictor variable.
In multiple regression, a confounder refers to a variable that is related to both the outcome variable (response variable) and one or more predictor variables. Confounders can lead to a spurious association between the predictor variable and the outcome if not properly accounted for in the analysis. It is crucial to identify and control for confounders to ensure accurate and valid results.
Option (1) is incorrect because using regression to isolate or adjust for variables is not an experimental process but a statistical modeling technique that aims to assess the relationship between variables in observational or non-experimental data.
Option (2) is also incorrect as regression analysis, while useful in examining relationships and providing evidence of association, does not inherently offer stronger evidence of causality compared to a randomized controlled trial (RCT). RCTs are considered the gold standard for establishing causal relationships due to their experimental design and random assignment of participants to different treatment groups.
To know more about multiple regression, visit:
brainly.com/question/31389527
#SPJ11
actions (1)
• Worksheet 11 : Mixed Numb
Worksheet 12 : Adding Fra
Worksheet 13 : Subtracting
Worksheet 14 : Addition an
Practice 3
Answer:
?
Explanation:
The US dropped the Second atomic bomb on the Japanese as a way to
scare or intimidate Russia
True
False
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
But it was also intended to send a message to the Soviets. Ever since America dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki, Japan on August 9, 1945, the question has persisted: Was that magnitude of death and destruction really needed to end World War II? American leadership apparently thought so.
type of finance ur regular and irregular income ,explain plz
Answer:
Answer is here
Explanation:
It is hard to manage your finances when your income is irregular. Budding entrepreneurs, freelancers and self-employed professionals are a few examples of individuals who witness the hardships of irregular income streams. This uncertainty becomes a hurdle in their long term financial goals. It is further observed that as these individuals receive a lump-sum amount in form of payments, they do not get the time to meticulously plan the flow of their income correctly. Therefore, they need to choose financial plans which offer future stability as well as a systematic way of receiving income on a regular basis
Empathetic listening, careful paraphrasing, and non-evaluative feedback are particularly necessary communication skills for which kind of interview
Empathetic listening, careful paraphrasing, and non-evaluative feedback are particularly necessary communication skills for a therapeutic or counseling interview.
In a therapeutic or counseling setting, the focus is on promoting a safe and supportive environment for the individual to express their thoughts, feelings, and experiences. The interviewer or counselor aims to actively listen to the client, demonstrating empathy, understanding, and respect for their perspective. Empathetic listening involves not only hearing the words spoken but also trying to understand the emotions and experiences behind them.
Careful paraphrasing is an important skill in this context as it allows the interviewer to clarify and reflect back the client's statements, ensuring accurate understanding and showing that their words are valued and heard. Paraphrasing also helps the client feel validated and encourages further exploration and self-reflection.
Non-evaluative feedback is crucial in maintaining a non-judgmental and accepting atmosphere. The interviewer should provide feedback that is supportive, non-critical, and non-directive. This allows the client to feel comfortable expressing themselves openly without fear of judgment or negative evaluation.
Overall, these communication skills are particularly important in therapeutic or counseling interviews to establish rapport, create a safe and empathetic space, and facilitate effective communication between the interviewer and the client.
To learn more about Empathetic listening, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30630848
#SPJ11
how old was tony hawk when he started skateboarding?
Answer: 9 years old
Hawk, who even as a child had little patience for failure, began skateboarding at age 9. He started entering competitions at age 11 and made an instant impression with his creativity and daring.
What is the literary device for. Thousands of mice came out of the barn
Answer:
A metaphor because a metaphor is a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
according to some studies, people who have religious commitments are more likely to ________.
Accor-ding to some studies, peo-ple who have religious commit-ments are more likely to live longer than do tho-se who do not have religious beliefs.
What Is Religious Belief?In order to de-fine religious belief, we should start by def-ining religion in gen-eral. Religion is the entire collect-ion of beliefs, values, and prac-tices that a gro-up holds to be the true and sac-red. A group's religious beliefs ex-plain where the peo-ple fit in relation to the uni-verse and how they should be-have while here on Earth.
Religious belief is a cru-cial part of that larger con-cept, and it is distinct from religious prac-tice.
To know more about religious beliefs click below:
brainly.com/question/26328184
#SPJ4
Affirmative action, if it is based on race only is not constitutional. True/False. According to the SCOTUS, all rights are absolute with no exceptions. True/False. The legislation that codified U.S. Supreme Court Rulings on segregation and discrimination, strengthened voting and unemployment discrimination laws, and withheld federal funds for discriminating parties, including individuals and companies was the A. Civil Rights Act of 2018 B. 13th Amendment C. Civil Rights Act of Affirmative Action D. Civil Rights Act of 1964 E. Freedom Rides Act
The above statement is false. Affirmative action, if it is based on race only, is not unconstitutional. The Supreme Court of the United States has established limitations on the use of race in affirmative action, emphasizing that it must be used as one factor among many in a holistic evaluation process.
The above statement is false. According to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), not all rights are absolute with no exceptions. The Court engages in a balancing act to determine the constitutionality of laws or regulations that may impinge on individual rights.
The correct option is D. Civil Rights Act of 1964. The legislation that codified U.S. Supreme Court rulings on segregation and discrimination, strengthened voting and employment discrimination laws, and withheld federal funds for discriminating parties, including individuals and companies, was the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This landmark legislation was a significant step towards ending racial segregation and promoting equal rights for all individuals, regardless of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
To learn more about U.S. Supreme Court, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31146664
#SPJ11
The blue line represents what Georgia river? A) Flint B) Savannah C) Ocmulgee D) Chattahoochee
Answer:
The answer is "Option D".
Explanation:
This river flows south-west thru all the northeastern Georgia through fort Sumter, south of something that is surrounded by Alabama and Florida, to both the water source at relevant governmental, Florida, which defines the Apalachicola, all along 702 kilometers its path, that's why in the given-question, the blue line represents the "Chattahoochee" Georgia river.
In paragraph 23, Thoreau discusses the effects of wealth on character. Paraphrase that discussion. Do you agree with his analysis? Why or why not?
The above question requires a personal answer, where you must express your opinion about Thoreau's text. For that reason, I cannot answer this question for you, but I will show you how to answer it.
To answer this question, you will:
Read Thoreau's text to which your question refers.You should reread the entire paragraph 23 of the text and analyze the arguments Thoreau presented in this paragraph about the effects of wealth on the character of individuals.After this reading, you should reflect on what Thoreau showed and decide whether or not you agree with these arguments.
After this decision, you will be able to answer your question as follows:
Present Thoreau's main argument.Show whether or not you agree with his argument.Show the reasons why you reach this conclusion.More information:
https://brainly.com/question/14358352?referrer=searchResults
__________ is defined as formally approved.
A.
levy
B.
ratified
C.
unicameral
D.
enumerated
Answer:
B. ratified
Explanation:
To consent to officially or formally; confirm or sanction: The Senate approved the treaty.
to what degree was vladek's survival based on luck, and to what degree was his survival based on his considerable resourcefulness? to what extent are vladek's aggravating personality traits a product of his experiences during the holocaust?
Vladek's Holocaust survival was probably a result of his resourcefulness and good fortune. For instance, he came close to being delivered to a gas chamber multiple times.
His resilience in the face of adversity, his willingness to take chances when necessary, and his capacity to form relationships with helpful individuals were just a few of the many things that helped him survive. There were, however, many instances when he was in great danger and was only saved by good fortune or unforeseen events.
At the end of the day, it is difficult to say with precision how much luck and resourcefulness Vladek's survival depended on, or how much his experiences moulded his character.
Learn more about vladek's survival visit: brainly.com/question/30340774
#SPJ4
. Explain three ways by which members of a co-operative society can pool their resources
Members of a cooperative society can pool their resources through financial contributions, labor and skills, and collective purchasing and marketing. These collaborative efforts enable them to achieve common goals, strengthen the cooperative society, and enhance the collective well-being of its members.
Members of a cooperative society can pool their resources in three main ways to achieve common goals and benefit the entire community.
Financial Contributions: One way is through financial contributions, where members contribute money or capital to the cooperative society. These contributions can be in the form of membership fees, share capital, or periodic contributions towards a common fund. By pooling their financial resources, members can collectively finance projects, invest in business ventures, or provide loans to fellow members. This helps in generating a larger pool of funds and provides the cooperative society with the necessary financial resources to carry out its activities effectively.
Labor and Skills: Members can also pool their labor and skills to support the cooperative society. Each member can contribute their time, expertise, and effort towards the functioning of the cooperative. This can involve participating in production activities, providing services, or volunteering in administrative tasks. By combining their individual skills and efforts, members can create a more efficient and productive cooperative, thereby achieving economies of scale and maximizing the utilization of available resources.
Collective Purchasing and Marketing: Cooperative societies often engage in collective purchasing and marketing. Members can pool their resources to purchase inputs such as raw materials, machinery, or equipment at bulk rates, which may be more affordable than individual purchases. Similarly, they can collectively market and sell their products or services, benefiting from increased bargaining power, wider market access, and reduced marketing costs. By collaborating in purchasing and marketing activities, members can leverage their resources to obtain better deals, increase profitability, and enhance their overall competitiveness in the market.
Learn more about cooperative society here: brainly.com/question/4492761
#SPJ11
There are some major differences between the ancient rome circuses and the ones we would see today but there are also some similarities describe at least two similarities and differences between an ancient roman circus and the ones that we see today
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The two similarities and differences between an ancient Roman circus and the ones that we see today are the following.
Similarities.
1.- Both were made for entertainment purposes, although entertainment in ancient Rome times meant something very different and cruel.
2.- It included people, acts, and animals, although as I said above, the shows were cruel, aggressive, bloody, and deadly.
Differences.
1.- The circus seated thousands of people. The circus buildings like the one in Rome were huge. According to historians and archeologists, these circuses seated 15,000 people (The small ones) to 80,000 to 100,000 people as was the case of the Roman Circus.
2.- Roma circus were open venues, did not have a tent like a modern circus.
The Roman circus presented gladiator fights like the ones we see in the movies. But they indeed were mortal. People were killed in the fights, They also released big cats such as lions and leopards that had to be hunted by fierce warriors or the animal killed people. Something very bloody.
Based on these visual sources, how would you describe the kind of society that the chinese communist party sought to create in china during mao’s lifetime?
Based on the visual sources, the Chinese Communist Party sought to create a society in China during Mao's lifetime that emphasized collectivism, equality, and loyalty to the party.
These visual sources depict scenes of peasants and workers engaged in collective farming and labor, highlighting the party's focus on communal living and shared resources. Additionally, the images often show people wearing uniforms or displaying images of Mao, indicating the party's aim to foster a sense of unity and devotion to their leader.
Based on visual sources, the Chinese Communist Party sought to create a society in China during Mao's lifetime that emphasized collectivism, equality, and a strong sense of national unity. These visual sources often depict images of workers, peasants, and soldiers working together towards common goals, highlighting the importance of labor and rural development. They also portray Mao as a revered leader and symbol of the revolution. Overall, the visual sources suggest that the Chinese Communist Party aimed to establish a society that prioritized the well-being of the masses and the advancement of socialism.
To know more about Chinese Communist Party visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1283463
#SPJ11
Do you think that it’s possible for typical people in average jobs to become millionaires? How?
Answer:
Yes because.....
Explanation:
Working a dead-end, unfulfilling job with an average salary? ... The point is that you can become a millionaire with an average salary. It might not happen overnight—in fact, it almost definitely won't—but even if it takes a few years, what matters is that you get there in the end.
What is the function of Scene VI with Horatio?
The purpose of the scene is to offer Hamlet a means of returning to Denmark so he can deal with his issue with Claudius. Additionally, it enables Hamlet to return in solitude so that he can attend Ophelia's burial.
How does Horatio participate in the Claudius murder witness line?When Hamlet and Horatio are by themselves, Hamlet inquires with Horatio as to whether he "didst perceive" Claudius's response. In response, Horatio says, "I did well note him." Horatio serves as a witness to Claudius' involvement in the King's murder in this way.
Given that Horatio has no involvement in the drama, their attributes don't contribute anything to it and have no impact. All of the main characters had passed away by the play's conclusion.
As luck would have it, Horatio enters Act 3, scene 2, just as the actors are ready to execute the "Mousetrap" for the court.
To know more about Claudius murder, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/20277372
#SPJ4
a state become good if its people are good how
Answer:
Because the state is running by them
state depends on people if the state people's r good then the state will have good qualities if the state people's r bad the state will have bad quality that's y we can say that a state become good if it's people are gud
NIGHT: How did the Jews of Sighet attempt to return to "normal" life in the ghetto? Can you relate this experience back to our current attempts at normalcy in our communities with the Coronavirus?
In Night, the Jews of Sighet attempted to return to "normal" life in the ghetto by setting up schools for children, establishing a council to oversee daily life, and creating a police force to maintain order.
They also tried to hold onto their religious and cultural traditions, celebrating holidays and praying together. However, these attempts at normalcy were constantly disrupted by the harsh conditions of the ghetto and the looming threat of deportation to concentration camps.
In our current attempts at normalcy in the midst of the Coronavirus pandemic, we can see parallels with the Jews of Sighet. Just as they tried to maintain a sense of normalcy despite the dire circumstances, we too are trying to adapt to the new reality of social distancing, remote work, and limited social gatherings. We are finding new ways to connect with loved ones and continue with daily activities, such as virtual school and online workouts.
However, like the Jews of Sighet, our attempts at normalcy are constantly disrupted by the threat of the virus. We are forced to navigate a constantly changing landscape, with new outbreaks and restrictions popping up unpredictably. And just as the Jews of Sighet were ultimately unable to fully return to normal life, we too may have to accept that our lives may never be the same again.
The Jews of Sighet attempted to return to "normal" life in the ghetto by adapting to their new circumstances and continuing their daily routines, such as work, prayer, and family life. They tried to maintain a sense of community and support for one another despite the harsh conditions they faced.
Relating this experience to our current attempts at normalcy with the Coronavirus, communities worldwide are also adapting to new circumstances, such as working from home, practicing social distancing, and wearing masks. People are finding ways to maintain connections and support systems through virtual communication and community initiatives, while striving to resume aspects of their pre-pandemic lives as safely as possible.
Visit here to learn more about Coronavirus pandemic brainly.com/question/29850972
#SPJ11
A major conclusion from research of the effects of newer interactive media, such as video games, is that
The effects of newer interactive media, such as video games, on individuals are complex and varied. While some studies have shown potential negative effects, such as increased aggression and decreased academic performance, others have shown potential positive effects, such as improved cognitive skills, problem-solving abilities, and hand-eye coordination.
Therefore, it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion on the effects of video games and other interactive media on individuals. Rather than focusing on whether these media are inherently good or bad, it is more productive to consider how they are used and in what context. For example, playing violent video games for long periods of time or using interactive media as a replacement for social interaction can have negative effects. However, using video games as a tool for education or socialization, or playing them in moderation, may have positive effects.
Overall, the effects of newer interactive media, such as video games, are not clear-cut and depend on a variety of factors, including the individual, the content of the media, and the context in which they are used.
To know more about media here
https://brainly.com/question/26152499
#SPJ4
Hello
Please response with your own idea and words. To give a better understanding. Thanks
What are some of the steps to building a risk assessment when analyzing a potential target? Which do you consider most important? Why?
Following steps are 1. Identify the Target, 2. Collect Data, 3. Evaluate the Target, 4. Identify Potential 5Risk assessment Risk assessment is an evaluation of risk to an organization. Risk assessment is most important as it helps to identify potential threats
Therefore, steps to building a risk assessment when analyzing a potential target includes the following: 1. Identify the Target: The first step in the risk assessment is identifying the target of interest, which could be an organization, asset, or system.
2. Collect Data: Collecting data on the target helps to provide information about the potential threat the target may encounter. Data could be obtained through various means, including open-source intelligence, closed-source intelligence, and social media.
3. Evaluate the Target: After data collection, an assessment of the target is necessary. This process helps to understand the target's strengths and weaknesses and provides valuable insight into the potential threats the target may face.
4. Identify Potential Threats: After the assessment, the next step is to identify potential threats to the target. This could be from both internal and external sources. Evaluate Threats: Evaluate the identified threats and assess the likelihood of them occurring.
Know more about Risk assessment here:
https://brainly.com/question/32694936
#SPJ11
Which idea does this secondary source support? Enslaved persons were too valuable for Southern leaders to consider emancipation. Many owners of large plantations could not afford enslaved workers. Plantation owners paid millions of dollars for enslaved workers. Almost all Southerners could afford to have enslaved workers in the antebellum era
Answer: Almost all Southerners could afford to have enslaved workers in the antebellum era
Explanation:
Slaves were not really expensive for those who owned plantation then. These plantation owners knew they needed people to work on their plantation for them, so they ensured they had enough slaves to do the job for them.
A. Enslaved persons were too valuable for Southern leaders to consider emancipation.
PLSPLSLSLS HELP 5 STARSS WILL GIVE
When responding to children’s poor performance on a math test, parents sometimes say: “I guess you are just not very good at math”. This is an example of:
a) Non-attributional negative statement
b) Attribution inference
c) Negative inference
d) Exaggeration
Answer: A
Explanation: A non-attributional negative statement is a type of statement that attributes a person's negative qualities or actions to their inherent characteristics, rather than to external factors. In this case, the statement "I guess you are just not very good at math" attributes the child's poor performance on the math test to their inherent lack of ability in math, rather than to external factors such as a lack of effort or a lack of understanding. This type of statement can be harmful because it can lead the child to believe that they are inherently bad at math, which can affect their motivation and confidence. It is important for parents to consider external factors when responding to children's poor performance and to provide support and encouragement rather than attributing their struggles to inherent characteristics.