They handle much of the litigation between businesses and its customers is true of small-claims courts.
What is small-claims courts?
Small-claims courts only have limited authority to hear civil disputes involving private parties. Small claims courts may also perform additional judicial duties and may go by different titles in different jurisdictions. Modest-claims courts often have jurisdiction over private disputes involving small sums of money. Unless a tenancy board already exists in the jurisdiction, the majority of cases filed in small-claims courts involve the normal collection of modest debts, evictions, and other conflicts between landlords and tenants.
Know more about small-claims courts- brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ4
tern for when businesses produce goods and services that consumer do not want
Answer:
Productive or technical inefficiency.
Explanation:
Factors of production can be defined as the fundamental building blocks used by individuals or business firms for the manufacturing of finished goods and services in order to meet the unending needs and requirements of their customers.
Basically, there are four (4) main factors of production and these are;
I. Land.
II. Labor (working).
III. Capital resources.
IV. Entrepreneurship.
Furthermore, when these aforementioned factors of production are combined effectively and efficiently, they can be used for the manufacturing or production of goods and services to meet the unending requirements or needs of the consumers.
In Economics, there are two types of inefficiency associated with the production of goods and services, these includes;
1. Allocative inefficiency: it occurs when businesses do not maximise output from the given inputs.
2. Productive (technical) inefficiency: it occurs when businesses produce goods and services that the consumers do not want. This is typically as a result of the incorrect and inefficient allocation of scarce resources by a business firm or entity.
Hence, a term for when businesses produce goods and services that consumer do not want is productive (technical) inefficiency.
Mary, Janet and Shantil formed a partnership, Brookdale Senior Care (BSC), to provide temporary housing and general care for elderly people in Memphis, Tennessee. One of the temporary residents left the stove on and burned down the house, which resulted in the loss of the entire building and contents. One of the residents, Francine, sued BSC and obtained a judgment of $ 30,000 against it, but the partnership could not pay the judgment
The option that Francine has since the partnership cannot get the 30000 would be to have assets that are worth this amount from the partnership.
What is a partnership?This is the type of business between two or more people were the parties have to share in the risks, the profits and the loss of the business.
Francine can get the assets from BSC given that this is a partnership and other it, all of the partners have the same liability
Complete question
Mary, Janet and Shantil formed a partnership, Brookdale Senior Care (BSC), to provide temporary housing and general care for elderly people in Memphis, Tennessee. One of the temporary residents left the stove on and burned down the house, which resulted in the loss of the entire building and contents. One of the residents, Francine, sued BSC and obtained a judgment of $ 30,000 against it, but the partnership could not pay the judgment.
What are Francine’s options if the Brookdale partnership cannot pay the $30,000?
Read more on partnership here:
https://brainly.com/question/25012970
#SPJ1
A. Africans' unified resistance to European intervention
B. Europeans' desire to develop industry in Africa
C. Europeans' use of both warfare and diplomacy
D. Africans' widespread acceptance of European laws
By using avoidance strategies, Africans were able to avoid colonial military and administrative injustices. Africans left their homes or concealed themselves when they heard approaching colonial armies, tax collectors, or labor recruiters in order to avoid violent encounters and eviction.
Africans fought European conquerors because they were afraid of them. Africans' intricate interpersonal relationships had an impact on the way they rebelled against the colonial power. They faced both European and African armies during their resistance to the European invasions. Due to the advanced military equipment that European colonists brought with them and which African forces were unable to match, African resistance to European imperialism fell short. Military opposition in Africa during the early stages of formal colonialism may occasionally be successful, although this was uncommon.
Learn more about it colonial here:-
https://brainly.com/question/28724126
#SPJ4
how evidence is tendered in court
Tendering evidence is when you ask the court to consider a document, photograph or other object as part of the evidence in your case. To tender an item, you must: have the prior agreement of the prosecution before you ask the court to receive it in evidence,
search and seizure laws and self incrimination laws originate
from the 2nd amendment to the constitution
true or false
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Search and seizure laws and self-incrimination laws do not originate from the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. These legal principles are derived from other provisions within the Constitution and its amendments.
Search and seizure laws primarily stem from the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by the government. The Fourth Amendment establishes requirements for obtaining search warrants, probable cause, and reasonable expectations of privacy.
Self-incrimination laws find their roots in the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees that no person shall be compelled to be a witness against themselves in a criminal case. This protection ensures that individuals have the right to remain silent and avoid self-incrimination during legal proceedings.
The Second Amendment, on the other hand, pertains to the right to bear arms and the regulation of militias. It does not directly relate to search and seizure laws or self-incrimination laws.
Evaluate the following statement: “If a signature on a check is forged, the customer will never be responsible for the amount on the check.”
Dana was a highly conscientious environmental health and safety manager at Fiberoptics Corporation. One day a janitorial employee reported to Dana that he found a brown paper bag in a corner of the men’s changing room inside the plant. Dana went to the changing room and confirmed the presence of the bag. She called the local fire department, which sent a first-responder unit to the plant. The plant was shut down and evacuated, while the first responders examined the mysterious parcel. It turned out to contain a bagel with cream cheese and a latte. The company lost more than $10,000 due to lost employee time and lost production, and the fire company sent the firm a bill for $2,000. The CEO told Dana, "I know you meant well, but you clearly overreacted. I’m not firing you, but I am demoting you to a position in the HR department. You’ll keep your salary."
Is Dana the victim of a retaliatory demotion? If so, what are her damages?
No, Dana is not the victim of a retaliatory demotion.
Retaliation occurs when an employer takes an adverse employment action against an employee for engaging in protected activity, such as reporting discrimination or whistleblowing.
In this case, Dana did not engage in any protected activity, she simply responded to a report of a suspicious package in the workplace. While the CEO may have disagreed with her decision to call the fire department and evacuate the plant, this is not a form of retaliation.
As Dana is not the victim of a retaliatory demotion, she does not have any damages. She was not fired or demoted because of any protected activity, and she was able to keep her salary. While she may be unhappy with her new position in the HR department, this is not a legal issue and does not entitle her to any damages.
For more similar questions on retaliatory:
brainly.com/question/14591700
#SPJ11
Which of the following best describes a business code of ethics?
An organization's policies and the ethical standards it expects its employees to uphold are outlined in a company code of ethics. The correct option is D.
A set of guiding principles known as a code of ethics in business is meant to ensure that a company and its personnel behave honestly and honorably in all areas of day-to-day operations and only take actions that benefit society.
Implementing proper corporate policies and practices with regard to apparently contentious matters is referred to as practicing business ethics. Corporate governance, insider trading, bribery, discrimination, social duty, and fiduciary responsibilities are a few topics that come up in an ethical discussion.
Thus the correct option is D.
To know more about business code, visit;
https://brainly.com/question/28334693
#SPJ3
Laws that govern acceptable behavior
How reasonable moral standards are when applied to your life
Universal standards based on impartial rules
Norms of behavior in a society
What are the 3 amendments that have to do with civil rights?
The 3 amendments under the American National Constitution that are to provide protections of civil rights, include the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments.
There are a number of amendments in the American Constitution that are intended to provide different types of protections of rights to the citizens in different fields. Thus, the civil rights and the fundamental rights of the civilians living in the American society are also protected under the thirteenth, fourteenth, and the fifteenth amendment given thereunder.
Learn more about amendments here:
https://brainly.com/question/30398497
#SPJ4
Which of the following individuals or groups can make laws? Select all that apply.
US. Congress
a state legislature
the Supreme Court
a high school principal
a neighborhood association
a the President of the United States
Answer:
state legislature the supreme court
What is the power to declare laws and executive orders unconstitutional?
The judicial branch has the authority to void laws that the legislative branch has passed.
Additionally, Congress has the authority to revoke an Executive Order by enacting legislation that nullifies it. (The President may, of course, veto such legislation; in that case, a two-thirds majority of Congress may override the veto.) Executive Orders are solely relevant to government workers. Private persons cannot be subject to specific limitations and regulations under an executive order.
They cannot be employed to pass a budget or repeal a law passed by Congress. Any Executive Order that has an impact on people who are not government workers is against Article I Section 1. The judicial branch also has the authority to declare a unconstitutional law to be unconstitutional, which allows it to check the executive and legislative branches' ability to enact laws.
Learn more about unconstitutional Visit: brainly.com/question/20800511
#SPJ4
The City of Sunshine is in the process of bringing a hockey team to the area and will need land on which to build a new arena. The site has been selected and Sunshine officials have offered the homeowners a fair amount for the property where the arena is to be built. What would this action fall under?
Answer:
This action would fall under the Fifth Amendment's eminent domain.
Explanation:
Eminent domain is the legal term used to denote the deprivation of ownership of an immovable or movable property by the state, within the framework of the law and against compensation. An overriding purpose serving the common good is cited as the justification for expropriations for traffic, military and other reasons related to state tasks.
Since property is one of the basic rights in market-based democracies, expropriations are only possible there in certain legally regulated exceptional cases. Thus, in America this is reflected in the Fifth Amendment, which establishes that property can only be expropriated for public use and with due compensation.
discovery occurs before trial and involves identifying and locating books, documents, or other tangible things and persons relating to the subject matter at issue. true false
The given statement "discovery occurs before trial and involves identifying and locating books, documents, or other tangible things and persons relating to the subject matter at issue." is true as discovery is a pre-trial process in legal proceedings.
During the pre trial phase of a lawsuit known as discovery, the parties exchange pertinent information and evidence. It entails identifying and locating books, papers, tangible objects and people who are connected to the topic at hand.
Each party can gather information during discovery, evaluate the merits of their position, and obtain evidence that can be used at trial. By giving parties access to pertinent information and preventing surprises during trial, it promotes fairness and transparency in the legal system.
Learn more about lawsuit at:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are known as :
Answer:
Some takeovers in the old days were caused by (INDIGENIZATION) laws, which required that nationals hold a majority interest in the operation.
Should police chiefs be appointed or elected? Explain your answer.
Before parliamentary acts were passed to regulate working, how many hours per day did most children work?.
Before the given parliamentary acts were passed in order to the regulate working, then children are not allowed to work for more than 12 hours in a day.
By 1833, any Government exceeded what become to be the primary of many acts handling running situations and hours. At first, there has been restricted energy to implement those acts however because the century advanced the guidelines have been enforced extra strictly.
Nonetheless, the hours and running situations have been nevertheless very difficult with the aid of using today’s standards, and no guidelines have been in region to defend person male workers. Working in the road jobs protected shining shoes, promoting newspapers, canning fish, making garments and weaving fabrics. With the understanding that youngsters labored in factories, mines, and different jobs we could speak approximately their wages and hours. A regular day for those abused youngsters become everywhere from 12 to 19 hours a day.
Learn more about parliamentary visit: brainly.com/question/1504316
#SPJ4
White Chocolate Chunk Pecan Cookies
INGREDIENTS
1 1/4 cups all-purpose flour
1/2 cup unsalted butter
1/2 teaspoon baking powder
1/2 teaspoon salt
1/2 cup white sugar
1/4 cup packed brown sugar
1 egg
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
1/2 cup chopped white chocolate
1/3 cup chopped pecans
DIRECTIONS
Blend sugar and butter together until smooth and creamy. Add the egg and vanilla; blend well.
Sift together the flour, salt, and baking powder; combine these ingredients with the creamed mixture. Add chopped white chocolate and nuts.
Spoon dough out onto a cookie sheet. Bake at 375 degrees F (190 degrees C) for about 5 to 10 minutes, or until golden brown on the bottom. Let cool slightly on the cookie sheet before removing, or they'll break.
What was the author's purpose for writing this passage?
A.
to inform readers of the proper way to eat cookies
B.
to entertain readers with a tale of two cookies
C.
to persuade readers that white chocolate is better
D.
to provide instructions on how to bake cookies
1. How is the role of an appointed judge in government different from an elected official?
An elected official's role in government is fundamentally distinct from that of an appointed judge.
While elected officials are chosen to represent the people and make decisions regarding policies, judges are appointed to interpret and apply the law.
The agency's policy decisions are collectively made by elected officials. That policy's implementation is the responsibility of staff. The majority of local agencies have their top staff members appointed by the governing body, such as a city manager, special district general manager, or county executive officer.
Local elected officials are responsible for keeping residents of the community informed and involving them whenever possible in community marketing and decision-making. fostering the expansion of all regional economic sectors.
Empowering reasonable strategic approaches. making a formal plan for the community as well as a strategic plan.
Learn more about Role of Appointed Judge:
brainly.com/question/31558031
#SPJ1
____________ federal law enforcement agency oversees taking into custody suspects charged with a federal offense.
Federal law enforcement agency which oversees taking into custody suspects charged with a federal offense is US Marshals. Therefore option B is correct i.e., US Marshals.
The United States Marshals Service (USMS) is a federal law enforcement agency responsible for protecting the federal judiciary and ensuring the effective operation of the federal court system. The agency is also tasked with apprehending fugitives and taking them into custody.
The USMS operates within the Department of Justice and is led by a Director, who is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The agency is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, and has over 94 districts across the country.
To know more about Federal law enforcement agency=
brainly.com/question/29588193
#SPJ4
In 2001 12-year-old Lionel Tate who was try doesn't adult was convicted of killing a six-year-old girl by practicing wrestling moves on her he was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole if the same crime occurred today would Lionel have been sentenced to death instead
No, even if the same crime had happened today he could not be sentenced to death if he was 12 years old.
Lionel Alexander Tate is the youngest American citizen ever sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, though this sentence was eventually overturned. In January 2001, when Tate was 12, he was convicted of first-degree murder for the 1999 battering death of six-year-old Tiffany Eunick.
The reason being, Lionel was not of competent age and he was tried as an adult as it was an exceptional case. Therefore, he could not be given death sentence even today as the judge at that time also took harshest of measures to treat him as an adult for a murder trial.
To know more about Murder Trial:
brainly.com/question/28289356
#SPJ1
A pedestrian was struck and seriously injured by a car driven by an intoxicated driver. The driver had been served several alcoholic drinks by a bartender at a local bar. The pedestrian sued the bartender in a jurisdiction that does not have a dramshop act. Is the bartender vicariously liable for the pedestrian's injuries
No, because there is no dramshop act in the jurisdiction to impose liability
i need a reflection of civil contracts
Answer:
A contract is an agreement between at least two natural or legal persons – the parties, or more specifically contractors – about what they will do with each other or for each other – the performance to be delivered – or not.
Contracts must be distinguished from obligations: an agreement creates an obligation, but the reverse is not always the case. If someone inflicts damage on another, this may result in an obligation to compensate it.
Sometimes a contract has a predetermined term, the period for which it applies. These must in principle be fulfilled. If the other party does not fulfill an agreement, it can, if necessary, be enforced through the courts.
Tom is the recorder for a meeting. Which of the following tasks does his job include?
Answer:
you didnt put the options but recorders write down everything said and done that happens within the court room
Regarding Heman Sweatt vs Painter, the US Supreme Court ruled that the University of Texas at Austin did act legally in its attempt to create a small separate basement law school facility to instruct him only as a black student.
True or False?
The statement "Regarding Heman Sweatt vs Painter, the US Supreme Court ruled that the University of Texas at Austin did act legally in its attempt to create a small separate basement law school facility to instruct him only as a black student." is false as University of Texas at Austin's attempt to create a separate law school facility for black students.
The US Supreme Court determined in Heman Sweatt v. Painter that the University of Texas at Austin's efforts to establish a separate law school facility for black students were not equal to the opportunities offered at the main law school and, as a result violated the "separate but equal" principle.
In the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional, the court determined that the separate facility did not adhere to the standards established by that precedent. Racially segregated educational institutions in the US were eventually abolished thanks to the Sweatt case decision.
Learn more about Heman Sweatt vs Painter at:
brainly.com/question/12304411
#SPJ4
Law help please
What is a law?
Explanation:
law is a kind of rule that is used in big society . like a city or country.
for example : city law
important note : do not use the word "law" for small societies like a family or a school!!
according to dictionary : law : the whole system of rules in a city or country that all of the people in that must obey .
which types of penalties are only imposed after normal due process including a trial?
In the context of criminal law, penalties that are only imposed after normal due process including a trial are generally known as "punitive" or "criminal" penalties.
Punitive or criminal sanctions that are normally applied only after due process, including a trial, include:
Imprisonment or Incarceration: If convicted of a crime, a person may be sentenced to imprisonment or incarceration in a jail or prison facility.
Fines: If a person is found guilty of a crime, the court may order them to pay a fine, which is a monetary penalty.
Restitution: Whenever a person is found guilty of a crime, he or she may be required to make restitution, which entails compensating the victim for any damages or losses experienced as a result of the crime.
For such more question on criminal:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements about alcohol consumption is CORRECT?
A)vomiting is a sign the body is getting toxic
B)vomiting at the end of a night of drinking is good
C)coffee will help sober someone up.
D) A person’s BAC will stop after he or she passed out.
Answer: A
Explanation:
A person has been unable to provide for their family. As a result, the children are hungry. They see that a fruit/vegetable cart has been left unattended and want to take food as they cannot afford to purchase it.
According to divine command, are they permitted to steal food to feed their family? EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER. Do you like your answer? Why or why not?
According to the divine command, they are not permitted to steal food for their family.
What is divine command theory ?The idea that something is right because God has ordered it to be thus is known as the divine command theory. In other words, it implies that morally repugnant or immoral actions are wrong because God forbids them. This theory is absolutist.
According to the divine command doctrine, God has given humans the prohibition against stealing. Therefore, it is morally required of people to not steal.
Divine command theory provides a cause to be concerned that God's commands are arbitrary as general guidelines for moral behavior. They might or might not be kind, loving, or possess any other quality we regard as morally admirable, and they might even be harsh and cruel.
To learn more about divine command
https://brainly.com/question/24356569
#SPJ2
difference between ritualism and retreatism
Answer:
Retreatism refers to rejection of both the goals and the means, and rebellion occurs when individuals reject both and then create new goals and means to pursue. According to Merton's theory, ritualism occurs when a person rejects the normative goals of their society but nonetheless continues to participate in the means of attaining them.
Fill the gaps with appropriate word(s) or phrases
1. .............. represent a person's polítical status by virtue of which he cut alegiance to
particular country.
2. A person having the power to hold manage property for the benefit of one or more
others
........in the day or sense refers to the rights of psople in or cver certain objectives or things.
The gains, benefits and advantages enjuyed or to be enjoyed as well as the loss,
detriments or disadvantages suffered or to be suffered is called......
5. British statutes which were in existence on or before 19 January 1900 were called........
Property could be classified into:
6.
7.
8. The court that has original, appellate and unlimited jurisdiction in all cases is......
9. Which court in Nigeria has a special jurisdiction to handle the revenue matters of the
Federation and other related matters such as custains and cycise?
The general rule is that every person is capabie of contradicting but some categories of
persons have unlimited capacity to contract. These categories of persons are:
10.
Answer:
An act that is performed only by a human being and thus is proper to man. When a human being does such acts, they are called acts of man but not human acts. ... Acts of man, therefore, are acts shared in common by man and other animals, whereas human acts are proper to human beings.
Explanation:
Please mark as brainliest