The right to marry were not included in restrictions placed on blacks in the south during reconstruction under the various state laws.
What were the restrictions on Blacks during Reconstruction?Several Civil Rights Acts (also known as Enforcement Acts) were passed during the Reconstruction era after the Civil War in order to expand the rights of freed slaves, outlaw discrimination, and quell violence against the newly freed people.
The Reconstruction Acts instituted military administration over Southern states while new governments were being constructed. Additionally, they restricted some former military officers' and Confederate officials' right to vote and compete for public office.
Southern states enact "Black Codes" in 1865 and 1866, which are laws that limit the freedom of Blacks in the area.
Therefore, the right to marry was not included in the restrictions.
To learn more about the restrictions on blacks in the south, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/22673649
#SPJ1
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was,
Which of the following were NOT included in restrictions placed on Blacks in the South during Reconstruction under the various state laws?
o the right to own and carry firearms without a license
the right to vote
the right to serve on juries with white defendants
the right to marry
What was the law that required men of certain ages to serve in the military?.
Answer:
selective service act
Explanation:
congress passed the selective service act into law wich required men in the U.S. between ages 21 and 30 to register for military service.
What is Liberal Constitutionalism?
Answer:
Constitutional liberalism is a form of government that upholds the principles of classical liberalism and the rule of law. It differs from liberal democracy in that it is not about the method of selecting government.
Explanation:
.Which of the following transactions is subject to the gift tax before the gift tax annual exclusion is taken into account?
Contribution of cash to a candidate for the U.S. Senate
Transfer to a trust for the benefit of relatives where the donor determines the amount of distributions to be made
Reimbursement to a grandchild for medical school tuition
Naming of a new beneficiary on an insured's life insurance policy
The transaction subject to the gift tax before the gift tax annual exclusion is taken into account is the reimbursement to a grandchild for medical school tuition. Option C is correct,
Gifts made to individuals or trusts for the benefit of relatives, such as the transfer to a trust where the donor determines the amount of distributions to be made, and naming a new beneficiary on an insured's life insurance policy, are generally not subject to the gift tax before the gift tax annual exclusion is taken into account.
However, the reimbursement of medical expenses, including tuition, for a grandchild or anyone else, is considered a taxable gift and is subject to the gift tax unless it is paid directly to the educational institution. The gift tax annual exclusion for 2021 and 2022 is $15,000 per recipient, which means that gifts up to that amount are generally not subject to the gift tax.
Option C holds true.
Learn more about gift tax: https://brainly.com/question/908415
#SPJ11
average north american babies double their birth weight by what age?
On average, North American babies double their birth weight by 4-6 months of age.Babies are constantly growing and changing. They start life as tiny, delicate beings and grow and develop at a remarkable pace. One of the most impressive changes that takes place during the first year of life is growth in size and weight.
Babies' growth is monitored carefully by pediatricians and parents alike. One of the most significant milestones in a baby's growth is when they double their birth weight. This typically occurs around 4-6 months of age in North American babies.On average, babies are born weighing 7-8 pounds. Doubling this weight means that they will weigh around 14-16 pounds at 4-6 months old. However, it is important to remember that all babies are different and will grow and develop at their own pace. It is essential to follow your pediatrician's advice and have regular checkups to ensure that your baby is growing and developing normally.
To know more about America visit-
brainly.com/question/19339803
#SPJ11
The law relating to the employment relationship is based on the traditional law called master and servant, which evolved into the law of agency. True or False
Answer:
only for points sorry.....
These theorists would be most interested in studying how objects (like a cop's badge or gun) play a role in impression management. Question 6 options: a) Functionalist b) Symbolic interactionist c) Feminist d) Conflict theorist
A symbolic interactionist would be most concerned with the parts these objects play in impression management. Thus, option (b) is correct.
What is management?The term “management” refers to the act of managing. The management of the business activities. Management is the basis of art, science, and the profession. Management are they manage the organization.
According to the symbolic interactionist was the concerned of objects play in impression management. The symbolic interactionist was the understanding of the human action and society.
As a result, the significance of the symbolic interactionist are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on management, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29023210
#SPJ1
some states placed restrictions on intrastate and interstate branches. given this development, what law gave the states the legal framework to do this? what additional law closed a potential loophole in interstate banking? what law changed these restrictions?
The McFadden Act of 1927 and other laws that tried to address long-standing concerns about the concentration of financial activity and concerns that large banking organizations operating in multiple states could not be adequately supervised were largely responsible for these restrictions.
Why did we remove restrictions on banking between states?
After it became clear that restrictions on interstate banking restricted banks' ability to expand regionally and made them vulnerable to local economic crises, regulations were eventually relaxed.
What resulted from the Riegle-Neal Act?
Banks can open branches in other states thanks to the Interstate Act, also known as the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.
Learn more about banking here:
https://brainly.com/question/25642105
#SPJ4
A defendant's pretrial rights include all of the following except.
A. to be informed of the changes
B. the right to legal counsel
C. the right to remain silent
D. negotiable bail
E. prompt arraignment
The correct answer to this question is D. Negotiable bail. A defendant's pretrial rights are essential to ensure that they are not unfairly treated during the legal process.
These rights include the right to be informed of the charges against them, the right to legal counsel, the right to remain silent, and the right to a prompt arraignment. Legal counsel is a critical aspect of a defendant's pretrial rights. This is because the defendant may not have the legal expertise necessary to navigate the legal system effectively. Legal counsel can provide guidance, advice, and representation throughout the pretrial process. During the pretrial phase, the defendant's legal counsel will work to gather evidence, investigate the charges, and negotiate with the prosecution. This may involve plea bargaining or other forms of negotiation that could potentially result in a more favorable outcome for the defendant.
To know more about Negotiable bail
https://brainly.com/question/28326209
#SPJ11
What are two interpretations of the term rule of law, depending on context? (Select all that apply.) Rule of law means that governments must establish clear rules and legal principles. Rule of law means that laws and rules must change based on decisions in court cases. Rule of law refers to the belief that all citizens must follow due process. Rule of law refers to the principle that government and government officials are subject to the same laws as everyone else. Rule of law refers to the belief that a government must have three distinct branches to properly rule.
Answer: your question about the answer to the question is confusing to me
Explanation: I don’t know how to do it
1. What are the differences between the provisions of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act?
2. Check for more recent situations where companies have been accused of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Why do you think these companies chose to engage in bribery?
3. Why is it so difficult to determine when a minor gift, entertainment, or incentive constitutes a bribe?
For my business ethics class.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of the United States and the UK Bribery Act (UKBA) have a lot in common, but they also have some notable distinctions.
The major differences between these two acts are explained below:Penalties: The FCPA is notorious for its large fines, with penalties that can be ten times the amount of the bribe. UKBA fines are not as severe as those in the United States, but the UK's new sentencing rules may make UKBA penalties steeper. Extra-Territoriality: The FCPA is applicable to every corporation that is listed in the United States or that does business in the United States, regardless of where the alleged violation occurred. In contrast, the UKBA has the exact extra-territorial reach but has provisions that make it more applicable to UK companies.Facilitation Payments: In certain nations, the giving of facilitation payments is a common practice. The FCPA has no provisions for this, but the UKBA does make allowances for facilitation payments. The UKBA is not to be taken as a "license to bribe." The new guidelines say that the case for facilitation payments must be "exceptional," which means that bribes must be kept to a bare minimum. FCPA and UKBA have a lot of similarities, but they also have some distinctions. The most notable differences are that FCPA fines are greater than those under UKBA, that FCPA applies to all corporations listed in the US or doing business in the US, while UKBA applies to UK corporations, and that UKBA allows for facilitation payments while FCPA does not.Companies have been accused of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for a variety of reasons. Bribery is a relatively low-risk, high-reward choice for businesses operating in nations where corruption is widespread. Companies frequently choose to engage in bribery in order to obtain favorable treatment, obtain permits, licenses, or other government authorizations, or to win contracts. Often, bribes are disguised as consultancy fees, commissions, or other transaction-related expenses, making it harder to track and detect them. Another factor is that businesses have a culture of gift-giving. In certain situations, small incentives, such as tickets to sporting events or gifts, can be appropriate expressions of gratitude or goodwill. However, determining when a minor gift or entertainment, or incentive constitutes a bribe can be challenging. As a result, it is important to implement rigorous compliance and anti-corruption policies that provide guidance on appropriate behavior.ConclusionBusinesses have engaged in bribery because it's a low-risk, high-reward proposition. Bribery is often disguised as legitimate business expenditures. Minor gifts, incentives, or entertainment, can be hard to distinguish from bribes. As a result, it's important for firms to have a strong anti-corruption policy in place to avoid the consequences of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
To Know More about Companies visit:
brainly.com/question/30532251
#SPJ11
Which act is violated if an employer refuses to provide health insurance to females due to the cost of pregnancies?.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act is violated if an employer refuses to provide health insurance to females due to the cost of pregnancies.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act is a federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. The law applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments and agencies, and labor unions.
The act applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments. Under the act, a woman must be treated in the same manner as other applicants or employees with similar abilities or qualifications.
An employer may not refuse to hire a woman because of her pregnancy, nor may an employer fire a woman because of her pregnancy. In addition, an employer may not refuse to provide health insurance to a pregnant woman or to charge her higher premiums for health insurance than it charges other employees.
Learn more about health insurance at : https://brainly.com/question/29042328
#SPJ4
Which of these le an example of eminent domain?
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Eminent Domain refers to the power of state and federal government's to take private property for public use.
How do we know that the opinions of people who call in to radio talk shows are not typical of most Americans?
Group of answer choices
As a sample, their opinions are ill formed.
As a sample, they lack intensity
As a sample, they are perfectly random.
As a sample, they are unrepresentative of the whole population.
Plzzz help Match the scenarios with the type of amendment they violate
Being a safe driver requires____
Answer:
The five abilities required for being a safe driver are: search, identify, predict, decide, and execute. You can avoid situations leading to road rage by: not cutting off other drivers.
Explanation:
Well...My father told me and he is a lawyer.
Description:
Being a safe driver requires a frame of mind focused on safety. It does require knowledge but the main part is your safety.
Key words:
1: Safety
2: Knowledge
3: Focused
Answer: A frame of mind focused on safety
Please mark brainliest
Hope this helps.
Which accurately describes a push marketing tactic to help manufacturers sell more products?
O A manufacturer launches a new print advertising campaign in several magazines.
O A manufacturer incorporates social media to increase brand awareness.
O A manufacturer creates a new television advertising campaign.
O A manufacturer offers department stores incentives for selling its product.
XYZ cable channel ran a story about an E. Coli outbreak in a national chain of restaurants serving Mexican cuisine. They showed a video of a local Mexican eatery not part of that national chain. What tort was committed by the cable company? O A. Appropriation B. Public disclosure of private information O C. False light D. Intrusion of solitude
The use of information to falsely accuse a company such as it occurred when XYZ ran a story that was not related to the restaurant they wanted to accuse is an example of False light (option C)
The false light is:
A grievance of the laws of the United States that refers to defamation.
They include a person's right to protection against false publicity to the public.
This right must be in balance with freedom of expression.
According to the above, in the situation, the cable channel XYZ incurred false light because they showed a video of a restaurant chain different from the restaurant chain in which there was an outbreak of E. coli.
Therefore, the chain of restaurants in the video would be affected by defamation because it did not correspond to the case of the E. coli outbreak. So the correct answer is C. False light.
as a petty officer you have the authority to issue orders. subordinates are required to follow your orders only if your orders are
Subordinates are required to follow the orders of a petty officer if the orders are lawful and within the scope of the petty officer's authority.
As a petty officer, you hold a position of authority within the military or naval hierarchy. With this authority, you have the ability to issue orders to subordinates under your command. However, it is important to note that subordinates are only obligated to follow your orders if the orders are lawful and fall within the scope of your authority.
In the military, orders are expected to be lawful, meaning they comply with applicable laws, regulations, and policies. Unlawful orders, those that violate laws or regulations, are not binding, and subordinates are not required to follow them. It is the responsibility of a petty officer to ensure that their orders are lawful and in alignment with established protocols.
Additionally, subordinates are only obligated to follow orders that fall within the scope of the petty officer's authority. Each position within the military has specific duties and responsibilities associated with it. Orders given by a petty officer must pertain to their assigned duties and align with the chain of command. Subordinates are not required to follow orders that exceed the petty officer's authority or involve tasks outside their jurisdiction.
Overall, subordinates are expected to demonstrate discipline and follow the lawful orders of their superiors, including petty officers. However, the obligation to follow orders is contingent upon the legality and authority of those orders. Subordinates have the right to question or refuse orders that they believe to be unlawful or outside the scope of the issuing petty officer's authority.
To learn more about officer Click Here: brainly.com/question/28486188
#SPJ11
TOPIC
You are assigned to a walking beat downtown, and every
morning you stop into a breakfast shop and have a cup of
coffee only. The owner does not charge you. After some
citizen complaints about the parking situation in the area,
the station has directed you to ticket all illegally parked
cars. As you are tagging the cars in front of the breakfast
shop, the owner comes out furious and asks what are you
doing? He states rather loudly, "I give you free coffee every
day and this is how you repay me"?
• How would you respond?
•
• Was there an implied consent that the free coffee
would be reimbursed by granting favors to the owner?
On a larger scale, could this lead to a perception of
corruption of the officer looked the other way or
warned customers that if they were parked illegally
and didn't move their cars they would be ticketed?
• What would be a solution to this issue?
In this case, I would respond by saying that giving free breakfast can be considered as a generous effort by the shop owner but it can never mean an implied consent for grant of favors.
Moreover, this could very well be perceived as corruption by the officers as they leave people without tickets despite illegally parking the vehicles and the grant of favors like the shop owner would also amount to bribery and corruption.
A viable solution to issue would be to make a rule to post proper advertisements about the penalty for illegal parking should be done. These advertisements would act as awareness as well as warning for people and then officers don't need to be lenient on people who still break the rules. This way, the issue of corruption allegations and illegal parking both can be resolved together.
To know more about Corruption:
brainly.com/question/15270178
#SPJ1
What is evidence-based criminology? How does the meaning of the word evidence in evidence-based criminology differ from the evidence found at a crime scene or used in criminal trials
an applicant shall be eligible for licensure by examination to practice cosmetology if the applicant is at least 16 years of age or has received a high school diploma, pays the required application fee, and has received a minimum of 1,200 hours of training.
The statement provided outlines the eligibility requirements for licensure by examination to practice cosmetology. there are three criteria that an applicant must meet: Age Requirement, Education Requirement, etc.
Age Requirement: The applicant must be at least 16 years old. This criterion ensures that individuals who are applying for licensure have reached a certain level of maturity and are legally allowed to engage in the practice of cosmetology.
Education Requirement: The applicant must have received a high school diploma. This criterion demonstrates that the applicant has completed their secondary education, which indicates a basic level of academic competence and readiness for further training in cosmetology.
Training Requirement: The applicant must have completed a minimum of 1,200 hours of training. This criterion emphasizes the importance of obtaining sufficient practical and theoretical knowledge in the field of cosmetology. The training hours serve as a measure of the applicant's commitment to learning and gaining expertise in the profession.
In addition to these three requirements, it is mentioned that the applicant must also pay the required application fee. This fee is typically associated with administrative costs related to processing the application.
To know more about cosmetology, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31105961
#SPJ11
The Safety Responsibility Law was designed to remove irresponsible drivers from Georgia highways and to protect insured motorists from uninsured motorists. True are false
Answer: True
Explanation:
This law, enacted in 1945, aims to exclude irresponsible drivers from driving and to protect insured drivers from the uninsured ones. To do so, the law states that those who fail to satisfy a claim for damages caused by a motor vehicle crash must have their driving license suspended for one year. The main goal of the law is to avoid having people suffering injuries in crashes caused by uninsured motorists, and it ends up encouraging motorists to purchase liability insurance.
employees who leave their jobs volunatrily may still claim under the title vii that they were constructively discharged. true or false
The assertion made is accurate. Employees who willingly leave their positions may nonetheless assert that they were "constructively discharged" by their employer under Title VII.
What is meant by jobs voluntarily?used to define an organization that is funded by contributors who donate their time and money to it without receiving compensation and that exists to assist others: He is employed at a nonprofit. It is an independent nonprofit group that offers financial guidance. An unpaid volunteer offers their services. A volunteer is bound by a contract to perform the services for which they are hired, not because they choose to labor for free. As a result, you must treat them differently and respect their rights. When an employee decides to quit their work or stop a contract early, it is referred to as voluntary termination.To learn more about jobs voluntarily, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30916774
Franklin has been worried about how he’s going to be able to afford his rent if he becomes unemployed. Although he doesn’t normally worry about such things, it feels to him that it might be a distinct possibility given the number of layoffs that have been occurring at his company. Which of the following stressors best describes what Franklin has been experiencing?
A. role stressor
B. social stressor
C. traumatic event stressor
D. Career development stressor
Answer:
The answer should be... D: Career Development Stressor.
The stressors that best describes what Franklin has been experiencing is Career development stressor.
Career development stressorSetting up of career is one of the top stress for today's youth. Job stress is a type of stress and is caused by conditions in the workplace that negatively affect an individual’s performance and/or overall well-being of his body and mind.
Factors related to careerThese factors usually include working conditions, work overload and work under load both qualitative as well as quantitative, long hours, excessive travel, too many decisions, deadlines and time pressures.
Thus, the stressors that best describes what Franklin has been experiencing is Career development stressor.
Learn more aboout stress here- brainly.com/question/10566565
#SPJ2
Mark broke into Laura's home in the middle of the night intending to steal Laura's flat-screen television, laptop, and whatever money he could find. In the middle of the burglary, Laura, hearing some noises, woke up and grabbed her gun to protect herself. As she entered the hallway, she saw Mark, screamed, and then shot him. Laura then dropped the gun and ran out of her home to her neighbor's, where she called the police. When the police arrived, Mark had died. How is this incident likely to be reported under the uniform crime reports? If Laura lives in a state participating in the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), how differently would it be reported? Are there any other reporting mechanisms that will reflect this incident? What "costs" will Laura likely incur?
Answer:
She will not get in trouble because she was defending her self.
Explanation:
Tactical treats can be performed in a variety of ways. Which way is not correct.
Coordinated
Coordinated
Ruse
Ruse
Deliberate
Deliberate
Dynamic
Dynamic
Understanding the Federal Justice System
Please choose the correct answer.
Which aspect of the federal judiciary
is specifically established in the
Constitution?
O The three-tiered structure of the
federal court system
O The Supreme Court's role as the
highest court in the land
O The number of justices serving
on the Supreme Court
The number of judges in the
entire federal court system
Answer:
O The Supreme Court's role as the
highest court in the land
Explanation:
Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it.
What is meant by the substitute judgement ?
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Substituted judgment simply refers to a decision that is made by an individual on behalf of someone else who is considered to be incompetent and therefore unable to make a decision for himself or herself.
In such scenario, the decision-maker trhes as much as possible to be accurate and make a decision with facts on behalf of the incompetent person.
Required information
Skip to question
[Revenge] Kelsie, a first-year law student, slipped on a freshly-mopped floor while walking to class. She bumped into Burgess, another first-year law student, breaking his glasses. He was very angry with Kelsie and slashed all of her car tires, causing damages of $1,500. Burgess also decided to sue Kelsie for negligence claiming damages of $300 for his broken glasses. He decided that he already knew all about the law and did not need a lawyer. Burgess sued Kelsie in state court. Kelsie, in the same lawsuit, brought an action against Burgess for slashing her tires. At the trial in state court, Kelsie told the judge that a friend, Aimee, told Kelsie that she saw Burgess slash all of Kelsie's tires. The judge disallowed Kelsie's testimony on that issue. Aimee also came to court and testified about seeing Burgess slashing all of Kelsie’s tires. The state court judge ruled in favor of Kelsie awarding her $1,500 in damages. Burgess said that he was not giving up and that he would seek double damages on appeal in federal court. Kelsie and Burgess live in different states when not attending school. After the trial, Kelsie reported Burgess' action of slashing her tires to the police, who said that they would proceed with a criminal action against Burgess. Burgess goes to see Alex, a recent graduate who had just passed the bar, and asked Alex to represent him in a federal court appeal.
Burgess asked Alex what his chances are regarding an appeal filed in federal court. What should Alex tell Burgess?
Multiple Choice
He should tell Burgess that a federal appeal looks promising but he would not be able to get double damages.
He should tell Burgess that the federal appeal looks promising but he would have to prove Kelsie was negligent.
He should tell Burgess that the federal appeal looks good if the law school admits fault in leaving water on the floor.
He should tell Burgess that the federal appeal is not allowed because there are not enough damages at issue.
He should tell Burgess that a case from a state trial court would not be appealed to federal court.
Option e. He should tell Burgess that a case from a state trial court would not be appealed to federal court.
In general, federal courts have limited jurisdiction and hear cases that involve federal law, constitutional issues, or disputes between parties from different states. The case between Kelsie and Burgess, which involves a slip-and-fall accident and property damage, does not raise any federal law or constitutional issues. It is a state law matter and falls within the jurisdiction of the state court.
The fact that Kelsie and Burgess live in different states when not attending school does not automatically grant federal jurisdiction over the case. The location of their residence outside of school is not relevant to the jurisdiction of the federal court. The case arose from a local incident within the state where the school is located, and therefore, it should be resolved within the state court system.
Burgess's desire for double damages on appeal does not change the jurisdictional requirements. Unless there are specific federal law or constitutional issues involved, a case from a state trial court would not be appealed to federal court.
Alex should explain to Burgess that pursuing an appeal in federal court is not an option for this particular case. Therefore the correct option is E
Know more about federal court here:
https://brainly.com/question/30408538
#SPJ8
A motorist is required to yield right-of-way to buses re-entering traffic after dropping off, or picking up, bus passengers
True or false
Answer:
very True, with an increasing severity of punishment depending on the state laws. It could be fineable up to hundreds of dollars, because the motorist is putting pedestrian lives in danger when they don't.