Which phrase best completes this list?
hurry fast plsss

Answer:

On February 4 of that year, representatives from South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia and Louisiana met in Montgomery, Alabama, with representatives from Texas arriving later, to form the Confederate States of America.

Explanation:

Answer:

It increased the slave population

Explanation:

The reason is because the cotton gin produced so much more cotton, the slave owners wanted more production with the gin which meant more slaves are needed to operate the gins.

Answer:

Without the cotton gin, slaves had to hand-pick the seeds from cotton one-by-one, and it was a lengthy process. But with the cotton gin, they were able to produce the cotton a lot faster.

This caused slave-owners to get more slaves since the cotton gin could produce so quickly with great effort and result.

Answer:

 Neerja Bhanot

Explanation: The Government of India awarded Bhanot the Ashoka Chakra Award. She is the youngest recipient and the first woman recipient of this award.

Answer: It was a bold move for Roosevelt to make at that time, just two days after becoming first lady and three days ahead of her husband’s first news conference as president. Roosevelt, heeding the advice of her friend Lorena Hickok, a reporter, invited only female journalists because only male journalists were allowed at presidential news conferences.

The correct answer is 1) an increase in European dominance in world affairs.

What was not a consequence of World War I was "an increase in European dominance in world affairs."

Indeed, it was quite the opposite. The Western European countries that participated in WWI ended up suffering the pain and destruction as a result of the war.

The consequences of World War I included inflation and bitterness in Germany, a sudden rise of new, unstable democracies in Europe, and prosperity for the U.S.

Some historians consider the terms of the Treaty of Paris and called it unfair or excessive. However, the diplomats and politicians who attended the peace agreement had to evaluate many circumstances when working out the details of the treaty.

US President Wilson had already presented its famous "14 Points Plan" but was rejected by the European allies. They wanted retribution, not peace. They demanded severe punishment for the pain and destruction caused by Germans during the war. That is how Germany had to pay for war reparations.

After the war, the United States lived a prosperous economic period called the "Roaring 1920s."

Answer:

treaty of Paris 1783 map

Answer:

There are a few reasons why supporters of winner-take-all congressional elections might like the process. One reason is that it can produce a clear winner in each race, which can provide some clarity and stability in the political process. Additionally, winner-take-all elections can incentivize candidates to campaign in a more aggressive and focused manner, which can lead to more effective and efficient campaigning. Finally, this type of election can also produce a larger pool of competitive races, which can increase voter turnout and engagement in the political process.

Explanation:

Give me brainliest if that helped :)

The purpose of the amendment of the constitution is to keep the sanctity of the Constitution and keep a check on the arbitrary power of the Parliament.

The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. After Congress proposes an amendment, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration, is charged with responsibility for administering the ratification process under the provisions of 1 U.S.C. 106b. The Archivist has delegated many of the ministerial duties associated with this function to the Director of the Federal Register.

Neither Article V of the Constitution nor section 106b describes the ratification process in detail.

Learn more about amendment, here:

https://brainly.com/question/12124635

#SPJ1

There was no obvious option that was unquestionably preferable for a slave during the American Revolution.

The promises and prospective consequences for enslaved persons were different for both British loyalists and American Revolutionaries. The American Revolutionaries promised independence and freedom, on the one hand. In exchange for a guarantee of freedom, some enslaved individuals fought with and supported the rebels. Although it did not happen right away after the revolution, many of the founding fathers who founded the United States believed that slavery was a moral wrong. The British, on the other hand, granted freedom to slaves who sided with them in the conflict. Many enslaved people supported the British as a result of the freedom promise. Yet it's crucial to remember that the British were not entirely selfless in their support, as they were also looking to undermine the American Revolutionaries.

To Know more about American Revolution Visit:

brainly.com/question/27833385

#SPJ9

Local tax money is allocated to fund essential community services and amenities, including public transportation, education, health services, parks, public safety (police and fire departments), and infrastructure improvements such as roads.

Local tax money is used to provide a variety of services and amenities to the community. These may include:Public transportation;Education;Health services;Parks and recreational facilities;Public safety services such as police and fire departments; andRoads and infrastructure improvements.These are some of the services and amenities that are provided by local tax money.

Learn more about Local tax money here :-

https://brainly.com/question/29889379

#SPJ11

Historically, the relationship between the type of colonialism and the eventual industrialization of the colonized nation has been that colonialism allowed the imperial powers to extract resources from their colonies, which in turn hindered the industrialization of the colonized nations.

Colonialism has been a hindrance to the industrialization of the colonized nations as it allowed the imperial powers to extract resources from their colonies without providing adequate compensation. This resulted in a situation where the colonized nations were left with little to no resources to build their industries, while the imperial powers had the resources to build their industries. A good example of this is the colonization of Africa.

European nations colonized Africa and extracted resources like diamonds, gold, oil, and other valuable resources. They shipped them back to their countries without providing compensation to the colonies. This left the African nations with few resources to build their industries and improve their economies. The type of colonialism has also played a significant role in determining the level of industrialization in the colonized nations.

To know more about colonized visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30737309

#SPJ11

The West's supremacy in science during the Renaissance can be attributed to factors like the revival of classical knowledge, technological advancements, exploration, and a more conducive environment for scientific inquiry.

The West's supremacy over science, beginning in the Renaissance, can be attributed to a combination of several factors. The Renaissance brought about a revival of classical knowledge and humanism, fostering an environment conducive to scientific inquiry. This was further supported by advancements in technology and the development of experimental methods, which allowed for empirical investigations and the accumulation of new knowledge.

The West experienced a period of intense exploration and colonization, leading to the exchange of ideas and the acquisition of knowledge from diverse cultures. In contrast, early Chinese society prioritized stability and harmony over individual pursuits, which limited the scope of scientific endeavors. Political instability, censorship, and a centralized bureaucracy hindered the sustained development of scientific knowledge in China.

To learn more about Renaissance follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/13577111

#SPJ4

The correct question is:

Science in early China achieved great sophistication, yet was superseded by the West beginning in the Renaissance. Why do you believe this happened?

Reynolds, David. 2003. "the origins of the two ‘world wars’: historical discourse and international politics." journal of contemporary history 38 (1) causes of World Wars I and II and its implications for international politics.

Reynolds explores how different interpretations and narratives have emerged regarding the origins of these global conflicts. He highlights the role of historical discourse in shaping our understanding of past events and influencing contemporary international relations.

By examining various historical accounts and perspectives, Reynolds aims to shed light on the complexities and competing narratives surrounding the causes of the two world wars.

The article likely provides a critical analysis of different theories and explanations put forth by scholars and historians over time. It explores the ways in which historical interpretations influence our understanding of international politics and the lessons we draw from past conflicts.

In conclusion, Reynolds' article contributes to the scholarly discourse on the origins of World Wars I and II, emphasizing the role of historical interpretations in shaping our understanding of these events and their implications for international politics.

By critically examining different perspectives, the article highlights the significance of historical discourse in shaping our collective memory and informing contemporary approaches to global affairs.

To know more about politics refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/33062400#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Absolutism was a purposeful attempt by European rulers—kings and queens, emperors and empresses, tsars and tsarinas—to extend their royal or dynastic control over all aspects of life in the lands they ruled. This heavy-handed approach to ruling was in part based on the old concept of the divine right of kings.

The letter of protest most likely pertains to the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline, which the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe opposes due to its potential environmental and cultural impact on their lands and water sources.

The Sioux, often known as the residents of Standing Rock, belong to the Dakota and Lakota tribes. The terms "Dakota" and "Lakota" signify comrades or companions. The word "Sioux," which goes back to the seventeenth century when the people were residing in the Great Lakes region, is frequently used to refer to the members of these nations.

Read more on the Sioux here: https://brainly.com/question/22367449

#SPJ1

Answer:

Both settled in New England (Pilgrims in Plymouth and Puritans in Massachusetts), both came to America for religious freedom, both were devoutly religious, both wanted to "purify" the Anglican Church of all Catholic rituals, both believed in pre-destination and religious "elect" leaders

Explanation:

1. Rejecting US Offers of Dialogue: One of the most significant actions by Castro leading to the Bay of Pigs Invasion was his refusal to negotiate with the United States.

Invasion is the act of entering a country, region, or area by force, typically with the intention of conquering it or gaining control over it. Invasions can be military, political, or economic in nature, and usually involve the use of force or coercion to achieve the desired outcome.

In 1959, President Dwight D. Eisenhower offered to open up a dialogue with Castro, which would have included economic aid and diplomatic recognition, if Castro agreed to certain conditions. However, Castro refused to negotiate, which angered the US government and led to their support of the invasion.

2. Nationalizing US Property: Another action taken by Castro that led to the Bay of Pigs Invasion was his nationalization of US-owned property in Cuba. In 1960, Castro seized US-owned oil refineries, sugar mills, and other businesses, which angered the US government and caused them to become more determined to overthrow the Cuban government.

3. Allying with the Soviet Union: The final action taken by Castro that led to the Bay of Pigs Invasion was his decision to ally with the Soviet Union. In 1960, Castro signed a trade agreement with the Soviet Union, which allowed them to trade goods and services and opened the door for Soviet military support for the Cuban government. This decision further enraged the US government and led to their support of the invasion.

To learn more about Invasion

https://brainly.com/question/606415

#SPJ1

Answer:

that the program gave too much power to the government.

Explanation:

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an American politician and statesman who was elected as the 32nd President of the United States of America in 1933. He was born on the 30th of January, 1882 in Hyde Park, New York, United States of America.

The Works Progress Administration (WPA) was an American agency that was established on the 6th of May, 1935 by President Franklin Roosevelt with Executive Order No. 7034, under the New Deal Programs (relief program).

The main purpose of the Works Progress Administration (WPA) was to provide employment opportunities for millions of job-seekers during the Great Depression. This program employed mostly unskilled workers to carry out or execute public works infrastructure projects such as construction of roads, public school buildings, hospitals, bridges, airfields, drainage and sanitary sewer lines, and the plantation of trees.

Furthermore, the Works Progress Administration (WPA) sponsored projects in the arts by employing thousands of writers, musicians, actors, and other skilled artists.

However, the Works Progress Administration’s was highly criticized for its creation of artistic and infrastructure jobs because people felt the program gave too much power to the government.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer: to encourage buisness development which he did succeed at but that was not his big success encouraging buisness developments is just what he felt was his job

Explanation:

hope this helps - Mal

Among the most ill-treated of Hellenistic slaves were those who worked in  mines and agricultural plantations, enduring extreme labor and abuse. They faced brutal treatment and lacked basic rights and freedoms.

During the Hellenistic period, slavery was prevalent, and slaves occupied various roles in society. However, certain groups of slaves faced particularly harsh conditions and mistreatment. Among them were those assigned to labor-intensive tasks such as working in mines and agricultural plantations.

Slaves in mines endured grueling conditions, often exposed to hazardous environments, including toxic gases and collapsing tunnels. They were subjected to backbreaking labor, with long hours and minimal rest. The working conditions were dangerous, and the mortality rate among these slaves was high due to accidents, malnutrition, and physical exhaustion.

Similarly, slaves on agricultural plantations suffered from brutal treatment and exploitation. They were subjected to heavy manual labor in harsh conditions, often working long hours in extreme weather. These slaves had little control over their lives, living under constant surveillance and facing severe punishment for any perceived disobedience.

The ill-treatment of these slaves was a result of their status as property, devoid of legal rights and protections. They were seen as disposable labor and subject to the whims and demands of their owners. The combination of physically demanding work, inadequate living conditions, and rampant abuse made them among the most ill-treated of Hellenistic slaves.

Learn more about Hellenistic slaves from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/32329138

#SPJ11

Mexican leaders initially welcomed American settlers to Texas in the 1820s and 1830s, as they hoped the settlers would help develop the region and provide a buffer against Native American attacks.

However, tensions arose as the American settlers began to outnumber the Mexican population, and many of them refused to adopt Mexican culture and language.

In addition, the Mexican government abolished slavery, but many of the American settlers brought their slaves with them. This led to conflicts and eventually, the Texans declared their independence from Mexico in 1836.

Mexican leaders were initially tolerant of the American settlers, but as they began to assert their independence and their differences from Mexican culture, tensions grew and ultimately led to a bloody war for independence.

For more questions like Tensions click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/14229739

#SPJ4

Explanation: It is not possible to answer this question as it is written, because the question does not provide any information about a specific text, soldiers, or deceased individuals. In order to answer this question, we would need to know more about the context in which people face death and the soldiers who were killed in the attack on Pearl Harbor.

Without this information, it is impossible to say how people in general face death, how soldiers might have faced the loss of life in the attack on Pearl Harbor, or how we continue to honor deceased soldiers. These are complex and personal issues that can vary greatly depending on individual beliefs, experiences, and cultural contexts. In order to provide a well-reasoned response to this question, we would need to have more information about the specific context in which it is being asked.

Answer:

I can't give you a direct answer but I can tell some facts about the two.

Explanation:

A lot of people believe that the Americans hunted down the africans and took them from there homes or villages. But in fact that is false there were many colonies in africa that sold their people to others for money and other things. I don't think they were treated any better anywhere in the world because they were considerd slaves; many people thought that weren't really people but property and people can do whatever they please with their own property. That is all I have for at least now let me know if that helped at all. Have a great day.

Answer:

An initiative would be the correct reform measure that voters could use if they wanted to change a law about taxes.

Explanation:

An initiative would be the correct reform measure that voters could use if they wanted to change a law about taxes

Explanation:

Answer:Nicholas Biddle played a significant role in the Bank War, which was a political and economic struggle in the United States during the 1830s. He served as the president of the Second Bank of the United States, a federally chartered institution.

The Bank War was essentially a conflict between President Andrew Jackson and his supporters, who opposed the bank, and those who favored the bank's rechartering, including Nicholas Biddle. Jackson viewed the bank as a monopolistic and unconstitutional institution that concentrated too much power in the hands of the wealthy elite.

As the president of the Second Bank of the United States, Biddle was a staunch defender of the bank's interests and fought to secure its recharter. He believed that the bank played a crucial role in stabilizing the economy and regulating the nation's currency. Biddle used his position and influence to rally support for the bank, including reaching out to influential individuals and businesses.

Biddle's role in the Bank War included engaging in a political battle with President Jackson. He actively lobbied Congress to pass a bill for the bank's rechartering, but Jackson vetoed the bill, arguing that it was unconstitutional and represented a threat to the common people. Biddle also sought legal strategies to challenge Jackson's actions and maintain the bank's existence.

Ultimately, the Bank War culminated in the removal of federal deposits from the Second Bank of the United States, orchestrated by President Jackson. This action significantly weakened the bank and contributed to its eventual demise.

In summary, Nicholas Biddle played a central role in the Bank War as the president of the Second Bank of the United States and a defender of the bank's interests. His efforts to secure the bank's recharter and challenge President Jackson's opposition shaped the course of the conflict.

Explanation:

Rousseau's ideas of the "natural law" leads to his publication of The Social Contract in the year 1762. His writings tend to reflect Enlightenment ideals because he desired greater rights for common people.

For Rousseau, the state of nature is relatively considered to be peaceful, but a social contract tends to become necessary in order to overcome conflicts that inevitably arise as society grows and when the individuals become dependent on others to meet their own needs.

Rousseau was considered to be the least academic of modern philosophers and in many ways he was the most influential one. His thought is also said to mark the end of the European Enlightenment.

Hence, it can be said that Rousseau's work had a great impact on the American and French Revolutions.

To learn more about Rousseau here:

https://brainly.com/question/24877678

#SPJ1

Answer: Many shipbuilders gained wealth as a result of supplying the military.

Explanation

Answer:

The abolition of slavery inspired the slaves and freed colored people of Saint-Domingue which resulted in the Haitian Revolution.

Explanation:

A large number of Africans were transported to Saint-Domingue under the French colonial rule in the eighteenth century, a direct indicator of the rapid development of the slave trade of the colony. Therefore in Saint-Domingue, there was a conducive environment for the resentment of the slaves, whose rage reached new heights inspired by both the rhetoric of the American and French Revolutions. What makes the Haitian Revolution unique was the fact that slaves and free people of color resisted the slave trade. and defeated the colonial rule of  French, Spanish and British.

The essay explores whether the colonists were driven by "ideas" or "interests." Incorporating scholarly views and personal analysis, it examines how these intellectual and ideological currents impacted the colonists' quest for independence and their understanding of rights, governance, and individual liberties.

The Great Awakening, a religious revival movement in the colonies, emphasized personal religious experiences, individual piety, and a direct relationship with God. It instilled in the colonists a sense of individualism, spiritual equality, and the belief in the possibility of change. The Enlightenment, with its emphasis on reason, rationality, and natural rights, provided the intellectual framework for questioning authority and justifying resistance to oppressive rule.

Greek philosophical thought, particularly the ideas of democracy and civic virtue, influenced the colonists' understanding of self-governance and the importance of citizen participation in decision-making. English philosophical thought, exemplified by thinkers like John Locke, contributed ideas of natural rights, social contract theory, and the right to rebel against unjust rulers.

English Commonwealth theory, stemming from the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, emphasized the limitations of monarchical power and the rights of the people. It provided historical precedents for challenging tyranny and defending the rights of English subjects.

To learn more about subjects

https://brainly.com/question/3541306

#SPJ11

The word "charisma" is used correctly in the following sentences: "Most people seemed to respond to the candidate’s charisma rather than to his political agenda," "Alyssa’s acting talent was not great, but she hoped her charisma would secure her a role in the play," and "Julio used his charisma to haul the leaky boat and its soggy passengers out of the water."

The word "charisma" refers to a magnetic charm that appeals to people. In the first sentence, it is used correctly to describe the candidate's ability to attract people through their personal charm rather than their political agenda.

In the second sentence, charisma is mentioned as a quality that Alyssa hopes will help her secure a role in the play, emphasizing the power of her charm and appeal.

The third sentence correctly uses charisma to describe Julio's ability to use his charm and appeal to successfully rescue the leaky boat and its passengers.

However, the fourth sentence states that Farhan cannot rely on his charisma, suggesting that charisma is not a reliable factor for his job prospects.

This usage is incorrect since charisma generally refers to a positive attribute that can have an impact on people's perception and attraction.

For more questions on sentences

https://brainly.com/question/18728726

#SPJ8