Which points does Jackson make in this section of his opening statement? Check all that apply.
Hitler was solely to blame for the war.
The Nazis planned to persecute the Jews and other groups.
The world failed to act quickly enough to stop Nazi aggression.
The Nazis started the war in order to dominate Europe.
Most Germans were ignored of Nazi policies.
Answers
Answer:
B. And D.
Explanation:
B. The Nazis planned to persecute the Jews and other groups.
D. The Nazis started the war in order to dominate Europe.
:)
Answer:
its
B. The Nazis planned to persecute the Jews and other groups.
D. The Nazis started the war in order to dominate Europe.
Explanation:
Related Questions
According to passage one what two actions are government
Answers
The two actions of the government mentioned in passage one are providing public goods and services and regulating private companies.
The government provides public goods and services such as national defense, infrastructure, public education, healthcare, and social security. These goods and services are generally considered to be beneficial to society as a whole, and not just to individuals or businesses.
The government also regulates private companies. It does this by setting rules and regulations that businesses must follow, such as safety standards, environmental regulations, and labor laws.
This is done to ensure that businesses are operating in a way that is beneficial to society, and not just to their own interests. By providing public goods and services and regulating private companies, the government helps to ensure that society is better off as a whole.
For more questions like Government click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/8561829
#SPJ4
What do you think was the greatest accomplishment of Roman civilization? Write an essay that describes the accomplishment and why you feel it was the civilization's greatest.
Answers
Answer:
The greatest achievement of Roman civilization was the domination of the Mediterranean Sea.
Explanation:
The dominance of the Mediterranean Sea allowed the Roman civilization to increase its slave structure, which stimulated the workforce to produce products that would be easily marketed. This commercialization was also stimulated by the dominance of the Mediterranean Sea because it allowed the Romans no impediment to expand their commercial horizons. In addition, they would find it easy to expand the Roman Empire, since this expansion was done mainly by marine means.
Compare and contrast Armstrong's model vs Towers Perrin Total
rewards model.
Answers
Both Armstrong's Model and Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model offer frameworks for designing and implementing comprehensive reward systems. While Armstrong's Model focuses on integrating various reward elements to drive performance, Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model takes a broader perspective by considering the entire employment experience.
Here is a comparison and contrast of the two models:
Scope and Focus:
Armstrong's Model: This model provides a comprehensive framework for managing total rewards, including both financial and non-financial aspects such as compensation, benefits, performance management, career development, and work-life balance.
Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model: This model takes a broader perspective and encompasses all aspects of the employment experience, including compensation, benefits, work environment, learning and development, recognition, and work-life balance.
Structure and Components:
Armstrong's Model: This model consists of six elements: reward strategy, base pay, variable pay, benefits, performance management, and employee development. It emphasizes the integration and alignment of these elements to achieve organizational objectives.
Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model: This model comprises five elements: compensation, benefits, work-life effectiveness, performance and recognition, and career development. It highlights the need for a balanced and holistic approach to reward management.
Emphasis on Employee Experience:
Armstrong's Model: While it recognizes the importance of employee experience, the model primarily focuses on designing and managing reward systems to drive performance, motivation, and engagement.
Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model: This model places a significant emphasis on creating a positive employee experience by considering factors beyond monetary rewards. It recognizes the role of work-life balance, career development, and a supportive work environment in attracting and retaining talent.
Implementation Approach:
Armstrong's Model: This model provides a systematic and structured approach to reward management, emphasizing the need for clear strategies, policies, and processes aligned with organizational goals.
Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model: This model emphasizes customization and flexibility to meet the unique needs of organizations and their employees. It encourages organizations to adapt and tailor their reward programs to reflect their specific culture, values, and employee preferences.
In summary, both Armstrong's Model and Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model offer frameworks for designing and implementing comprehensive reward systems. While Armstrong's Model focuses on integrating various reward elements to drive performance, Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model takes a broader perspective by considering the entire employment experience. The choice between the two models depends on the organization's specific goals, culture, and desired emphasis on employee experience.
To know more about culture, click here https://brainly.com/question/30497684
#SPJ11
Charles Martel defeated the Seljuk Turks at Acre. True or False?
Answers
Answer: False
Explanation: he didn't even make war with Selijuk
False. Charles Martel did not defeat the Seljuk Turks at Acre. Charles Martel, also known as Charles the Hammer, was a Frankish military leader who lived in the 8th century.
On the other hand, the Seljuk Turks were a Central Asian group that rose to power in the 11th century. They established a vast empire in the Middle East and played a significant role in the Crusades. The city of Acre, located in present-day Israel, was a crucial stronghold during the Crusades, serving as a major battleground between the Christian forces and Muslim powers.
While Charles Martel's victory at the Battle of Tours was significant in repelling the Moors, it had no connection to the Seljuk Turks or the city of Acre. It is important to note that Acre was captured by the Crusaders in 1104 during the First Crusade but later recaptured by the Muslims. The most notable confrontation between the Crusaders and the Seljuk Turks at Acre occurred during the Third Crusade, primarily between 1189 and 1191, with the city eventually falling to the Crusaders under the leadership of King Richard I of England.
In summary, Charles Martel did not defeat the Seljuk Turks at Acre. His renowned victory took place at the Battle of Tours against the Moors, while Acre was a pivotal location in the conflicts between the Crusaders and Muslim powers during the Crusades.
Learn more about Charles Martel here
https://brainly.com/question/3249408
#SPJ11
24. What was the spontaneous eruption of strikes throughout the Midwest known as?
The Great Upheaval
The Great Strike
The Strike movement
The Great Awakening
Answers
Answer: The great upheaval
Explanation:I got it right on the test :) good luck
To protect the Spanish settlements, Spain built ______________ [military forts] and filled
them with soldiers.
Answers
to protect the spanish settlements spain built missions and filled them with soldiers
What was the name of the process
developed to make steel at a
faster rate in the mid-1800s?
Answers
Answer:
Bessemer process
Explanation:
: l
all of the statements below are historically accurate. mark the item if the event it describes helped lead to war between britain and the american colonists. choose all answers that are correct. responses A. the massachusetts militia and the british army fought at lexington. B. the massachusetts militia and the british army fought at lexington. C. colonists protested british taxes in the boston tea party. D. colonists protested british taxes in the boston tea party. E. the constitutional convention met in philadelphia.
Answers
Events that led to war between Britain and the American colonists are: B).The massachusetts militia and the British army fought at Lexington.
Colonists protested British taxes in the Boston Tea Party. The above events led to the war between Britain and the American colonists. The other option which is the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia, did not contribute to the war between Britain and the American colonists.
What was the American Revolution?The American Revolution was a political upheaval in the latter half of the 18th century in which the 13 colonies overthrew the rule of Great Britain, and then founded the United States of America, which would grow to become a superpower.
The Revolution began on April 19, 1775, with the Battles of Lexington and Concord; it would end in September 1783 with the Treaty of Paris.
To Know more about American colonists refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15899289#
#SPJ11
What is the Coahuiltecans culture?
Answers
Answer:
The Coahuiltecan were various small, autonomous bands of Native Americans who inhabited the Rio Grande valley in what is now southern Texas and northeastern Mexico. The various Coahuiltecan groups were hunter-gatherers
Explanation:
Hope this helps
What nationalities besides the English began to arrive in America in the late 17th century?
Answers
Answer:
In the southern US, there were English, German, Scotch-Irish (Scots who settled in northern Ireland in the 1600s, then further emigrated to the US), Scotch (lowland and highland) and French!. And a few from other cultures!
Hope this helps!（づ￣3￣）づ╭❤～
Which Group of adult males, ages 18 to 45, was NOT required to fight in the U.S. Military during World War I?
American Socialists
O Conscientious objectors
People who opposed the war
American Indians with U.S. citizenship
Answers
Answer:
O Conscientious objectors
Explanation:
Answer:
Conscientious objector
Explanation:
Conscientious objector, deferred by reason of being 28 and over. Conscientious objector, available for or assigned to civilian work of national importance, age 38 to 44 inclusive. Conscientious objector qualified for limited service.
How many names did the average Roman male have?
Answers
Answer:
the given name and clan name
Explanation:
Which of the following provides evidence of interaction and exchange among the First Civilizations and surrounding regions in the ancient world?
(A) Gunpowder
(B) Horse-drawn chariots
(C) Abacus
(D) Tea
Answers
Evidence of this interaction can be seen in the use of certain artifacts and technologies in various regions. Examples of this include horse-drawn chariots, which facilitated transport and allowed for rapid mobility, and the use of the abacus, which was a central part of trade and financial transactions.
Correct option is B.
Another prime example of this exchange is gunpowder, which was invented in China and gradually spread around the world. Tea is also an example of such exchange, as it originated in ancient China and spread across the Middle East, India, and Europe, becoming renowned for its various culinary purposes and forms of medicinal use.
The importance of these exchanges and interactions between regions and civilizations cannot be understated, as they were the backbone of the rise and evolution of the ancient world.
Correct option is B.
know more about about facilitated here
https://brainly.com/question/18122054#
#SPJ11
ok ive tried my best but i can't HELLLPPPP
Answers
I hope this helps! Please give thanks or brainliest if you can :)
The Greeks have always used statues to represent peace, justice, or revenge, especially using female figures<3
1) Explain how our present confrontational relationship with Iran is a reflection of US foreign policy during the Cold War.
2)Explain why Turkey was a vital US ally throughout the Cold War era.
Answers
Answer:
The United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran have had no formal diplomatic relationship since that date. Switzerland is the U.S. protecting power and provides limited consular services to U.S. citizens in Iran. Iran has no embassy in Washington, D.C
What was one of the main goals of the mission system?
to teach Indigenous peoples new skills and trades
to replace cultures of Indigenous peoples with European culture
to train Indigenous peoples as potential soldiers
o to learn from Indigenous peoples how to use resources
Answers
Louis xlv called himself the sun king because he thought he was the center of france much like how the sun is the center of the solar system true or false
Answers
Answer:
I think false
Explanation:
although he was called the sun king, the reasoning is wrong.
i need help if correct ill mark brainliest
To avoid fighting a war on two fronts, Bismarck negotiated a separate treaty with which of the following A) France B) Great Britain C) Belgium D) Russia
Answers
Answer:
B)great Britian
Explanation:
because they were powerful and friendly
Question is attached in the image below
Answers
Answer:
grassland and savannah that borders the desert area of the Sahara
Explanation:
look it up :)
Essential Question: What are the ideals and principles that the United States of America was founded on?
What does it mean to be American? (You may write your answer, use a mind map, or sketch your response
in this box.)
Page 2
Credit 1
L4L US History A Chronological (2020)
United States History A
LEARN 4 LIFE
CHANGES LIVES
Answers
Being American means protecting these ideals and principles and continuing to fight for justice and freedom for all.
Nathan Brownson
Brownson was born in Woodbury, Connecticut, in 1742, to Abigail and Timothy Brownson. After he graduated from Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, in 1761, Brownson studied to become a physician and went on to practice medicine in Connecticut. He appears to have married three times: first, in 1769, to Elizabeth Lewis; then to Elizabeth Dunham (or Donnom) in 1774; and finally to Elizabeth McLean in 1776. There were two children from his marriage to McLean.
In 1774 Brownson moved from Connecticut to Riceboro, Georgia, just south of Midway, in Liberty County. He quickly became a leader of the resistance to British tyranny. Brownson was one of the representatives from St. John’s Parish to the second full Provincial Congress, which met in Savannah in July 1775. On October 9, 1776, Georgians chose him as a delegate to the Continental Congress and reelected him to a second term on June 7, 1777.
The Georgia patriots were deeply divided. Economic status, family ties, politics, religion, geography, and the tensions generated by the defeats on the battlefield and British occupation of Georgia all contributed to the rise of two factions, one radical and one conservative, among the Georgia patriots during the Revolutionary War. At times it seemed that these two Georgia factions fought more with each other than they did with the British. In spite of his strong conservative beliefs, Brownson showed by his voting record in Congress that he was willing to consider the views of his political opponents. His proven ability to work with people of varying political beliefs probably helped to elect him governor in 1781.
After the British were driven out of Augusta in June 1781, however, the future of Georgia as an independent and free state depended on bringing these two warring factions together to reconstitute the state’s government. To lead them in this effort, the people of Georgia turned to Brownson, the physician and statesman, in the hope that he could begin the process of healing the wounds caused by the strife between the radical and conservative factions. On August 17, 1781, Brownson was unanimously elected speaker of the assembly, which then elected him governor.
Governor Brownson immediately set out to secure Georgia "against the machinations of Public and Private Enemies" and to take measures designed to restore peace, tranquility, and prosperity to the state. During his brief term of office the government of Georgia implemented measures to encourage the return of citizens who had fled the state because of the hardships of the war, and it passed legislation designed to obtain food and clothing for those whose farms and businesses were ruined by the war. The state also had to provide a defense against the continued threat of British troops and bands of armed Tories. On January 2, 1782, John Martin was elected to succeed Brownson as governor of Georgia.
Brownson’s career in public service continued after his term as governor. In June 1782 he was appointed deputy purveyor for southern hospitals. In the 1780s he served as a representative in the Georgia House of Assembly. He was a member of the Georgia convention that ratified the U.S. Constitution in 1788. In 1789 he served in the convention that rewrote Georgia’s constitution. He became the first president of the new Georgia senate and served in that office from 1790 to 1791. He joined with Abraham Baldwin, another Yale graduate, in working for the creation of a state-supported institution of higher education, which would become known as the University of Georgia.
On October 18, 1796, Nathan Brownson died at his home in Riceboro.
Question: briefly discuss Nathan Brownson's role in the American Revolution in Georgia.
Answers
Nathan Brownson was a leader of the resistance to British tyranny. He served as a governor of Georgia and led efforts to bring together the divided factions in Georgia during the American Revolution.
Nathan Brownson, who was born in Connecticut, became a leader of the resistance to British tyranny in Georgia after he moved to Riceboro, Georgia. He represented St. John’s Parish to the second full Provincial Congress in Savannah in July 1775. In October 1776, Georgians chose him as a delegate to the Continental Congress and reelected him to a second term on June 7, 1777. Nathan Brownson became a governor of Georgia in 1781, and his efforts led to the healing of wounds caused by the strife between the radical and conservative factions in Georgia during the American Revolution.
During his term of office, the government of Georgia implemented measures to encourage the return of citizens who had fled the state because of the hardships of the war, and passed legislation designed to obtain food and clothing for those whose farms and businesses were ruined by the war, and provided a defense against the continued threat of British troops and bands of armed Tories.
To know more about the American Revolution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18759160
#SPJ11
Based on the precedent set in Township of Kingfisher v. Wood and Fossett, what would you expect the verdict of this land
dispute to be?
A. John T. will keep the land as a reward for serving his country.
B. Mark S. will keep the land because he started outside the territory.
C. John T. will keep the land because he did not leave the territory.
D. Neither of these men will be allowed to keep their claims.
Answers
Answer:
b i think
Explanation:
Answer:
B Mark S. will keep the land because he started outside the territory.
Explanation:
i just took the test edge 2021
What is the impact of the rise of the Manorial system?
Answers
Answer:
The Manorial system was the most convenient device for organizing the estates of the aristocracy and the clergy in the middle ages in Europe and it made feudalism possible.
Explanation:
I majored in History.
The Immigration Act of 1965 eliminated the country quotas created in 1924, gave
priority to
and job skills, and realigned the streams of immigration
from Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa.
athletes and celebrities
family reunification
undocumented immigrants
O adult children
Answers
The Immigration Act of 1965 eliminated the country quotas created in 1924, gave priority and job skills, and realigned the streams of immigration from Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa.
family reunificationWhat is the Immigration Act of 1965?This was a legislative act which was passed in the year 1965 to give preference to relatives and children of American citizens and has a seven point category system.
With this in mind, we can see that family reunification was the aim as relatives and children of legal US residents and citizens were allowed to migrate to America.
Read more about immigration here:
https://brainly.com/question/10809589
Since the ratification of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1791, Congress has been prohibited from making any law "abridging the freedom of speech." Clearly, at that time the framers did not anticipate radio, television, the movies, computers, computer programs, or the Internet. As radio, television, and the movies became important at the beginning and middle of the twentieth century, they gave rise to free speech issues. As the Internet moves into virtually everyone’s home and place of work in the twenty-first century, First Amendment issues have arisen and will continue to arise.
A major contemporary legal debate today concerns free speech rights in the context of intellectual property in digital form that is encrypted to prevent its unauthorized copying and use.
If you buy a book, you can read it, throw it away, give it to someone else, or sell it to a used bookstore. Once you have bought it, you can legally do just about anything with it except make copies for resale. There is no way that the owner of the intellectual property contained in that book can insert an encryption system to prevent you from letting someone else read it. In contrast, any form of digitized intellectual property can contain an encryption system.
At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public’s benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, music, and books in digital form to make limited copies for fair use. Which side of this debate do you support? Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue? Your response must provide at least two potential solutions to resolve the conflict between creatives/artists right to profit from their work and need for the fee flow of ideas for the public's benefit.
Answers
The debate surrounding free speech rights and intellectual property in the digital age is indeed complex. While there are valid arguments on both sides, it is possible to consider potential solutions that strive to strike a balance between creator rights and the free flow of ideas for the public's benefit. Here are two potential approaches:
Flexible Fair Use Guidelines: Fair use provisions allow for the limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. In the context of digital intellectual property, establishing flexible fair use guidelines could enable individuals to make limited copies for personal or educational purposes. This is while still respecting creator rights. This would require clear and specific criteria for what constitutes fair use in the digital realm. These criteria would take into account the nature of the work, its impact on the market, and the extent of copying.Voluntary Collaborative Platforms: Creating voluntary collaborative platforms or licensing schemes could provide a framework where creators, users, and distributors can negotiate mutually beneficial terms. These platforms could allow for digital content sharing while ensuring creators receive appropriate compensation. Such platforms could encourage innovation and the free flow of ideas, while still respecting creators' economic interests.It is imperative to note that finding the right balance between creator rights and public benefit is challenging and requires careful consideration. Solutions should strive to protect creativity and innovation incentives, while also allowing for reasonable access to and use of digital content by the public. Collaborative efforts involving stakeholders from various sectors, including creators, consumers, policymakers, and technology experts, could help formulate effective and balanced solutions to address the concerns raised in this debate.
Us constitution. And
Georgia
constitution
Compare The structure of each document. Are they laid out similar how are they different ?
Question 2
Does each document have a bill of rights if so how do the rates listed in each compare
Question 3
State one specific difference between these two constitutions give one example that one has and the other does not add a brief explanation as to how this demonstrates the concept of federalism
Question 4
What are the steps to amend each constitution?
Answers
Answer:
Not sure sorryyyy
Explanation:
Helpppppppppppppppppp
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Others don't make sense. A relates most to taxes ig.
Between 1820 and 1850, some Americans discriminated against German immigrants because they
A. were Protestant.
B. did not speak English.
C. were hired as skilled workers.
D.wanted to become farmers.
Answers
Answer:
D. They wanted to become farmers.
Explanation:
Answer:
your answer would be D. wanted to become farmers
Explanation:
Cardinal Richelieu and later Cardinal Mazarin both worked to lessen royal power?
Answers
Cardinal Richelieu contributed significantly to the building of the French monarchy by diminishing those who may oppose the king & strengthening those who might support him.
The Huguenots and aristocrats were seen as the greatest dangers to the monarchy's power by Richelieu and Louis XIII. Richelieu intended to limit the authority of the feudal nobles in order to further solidify power in France.
In 1626, he abolished the title of Captain of France and ordered the destruction of all fortified castles, except those required to protect against invaders.
Both ministers were cardinals (though, unlike Richelieu, Mazarin has never ordained a priest); they both rose to political prominence from unlikely social backgrounds, particularly Mazarin, who was born and raised in Italy; and they openly used their political clout to enrich themselves and their families.
Learn more about Cardinal Richelieu here:
https://brainly.com/question/30555505
#SPJ4
Farmers supported increasing the amount of money in circulation in order to
A. Decrease the money supply and raise the value of the dollar
B.protect foreign trade by increasing tariffs
C.increase the money supple and lower the value of the dollar
D. Protect eastern business interest by lowering tariffs
Plzzz help
Answers
Answer:
i think its a or d
Explanation: