Answer: A
Since Native Americans helped Christopher Columbus live, they were replaced for black African slaves.
Hope this helps you!
why did the u.s. armed forces abolish the draft in 1973 and turn to an all-volunteer, professional force?
The U.S. Armed Forces abolished the draft and turned to an all-volunteer, professional force in 1973 for several reasons. Here are a few key reasons: public Opposition, Military Ineffectiveness, Cost Savings and Technological Advancements.
People Opposition: The American people had been sharply divided over the Vietnam War, and the military drawdown had turned into a hotbed for demonstrations and social upheaval.
Military Ineffectiveness: The draught had additionally come under fire for creating a military force that was less effective.
Cost savings: The military thought that an all-volunteer force could ultimately be more cost-effective given how expensive the Vietnam War had grown to be.
Technological Developments: The military was also relying more and more on high-end equipment and specialised knowledge.
For such more question on Military:
https://brainly.com/question/1050942
#SPJ11
How were conditions best described for workers in mines, mills and factories prior to1850? -dangerous
-healthy
-paid well
-protected by strict laws
The condition that best described for workers in mines, mills and factories prior to 1850 is dangerous, the correct option is A
Although historians continue to argue the extent to which those working conditions exacerbated the fate of the worker in pre-industrial society, workers in factories, mills, and mines endured long hours and extremely hazardous conditions during the Industrial Revolution.
Due to industrialization, there were more job prospects for regular workers in the new mills and factories, but these frequently had severe working conditions and required long hours of effort at a pace dictated by machines. Craft production models gave way to factory-centric models as the nature of work changed.
To learn more about the mines follow the link: https://brainly.com/question/30468510
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
How were conditions best described for workers in mines, mills and factories prior to 1850?
A dangerous
B protected by strict laws
C healthy
D paid well
By 1900 the U.S. became one of the world's leading manufacturing nation What led to this development?
There were several factors that contributed to the United States becoming one of the world's leading manufacturing nations by 1900.
Here are some of the factors that led to this development.
1. Abundant Natural Resources: The United States had abundant natural resources, including iron, coal, and oil. These resources were essential for the growth of manufacturing, as they provided the raw materials and energy needed to power factories.
2. Population Growth: The population of the United States grew rapidly during the 19th century, creating a large and growing market for manufactured goods. This demand helped to fuel the growth of manufacturing, as companies sought to meet the needs of consumers.
3. Technological Innovations: The United States was a leader in technological innovation during the 19th century. This included advances in machinery, transportation, and communication, which helped to improve the efficiency of manufacturing and reduce costs.
4. Government Policies: The U.S. government played a role in supporting the growth of manufacturing. This included policies that protected domestic industries from foreign competition, as well as investments in infrastructure such as railroads and canals that made it easier to transport goods across the country.
5. Entrepreneurship: Finally, the United States had a culture of entrepreneurship that encouraged people to start their own businesses and pursue new ideas. This helped to create a dynamic and innovative economy that was well-suited to manufacturing.
To learn more about manufacturing, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32338174
#SPJ11
What was the main issue (legal question) in the olmstead v saint paul public schools case?
The main issue (legal question) in the Olmstead v. Saint Paul Public Schools case was whether the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires public schools to provide special education services to students with disabilities in the regular education classroom.
The Olmstead v. Saint Paul Public Schools case revolved around the interpretation and application of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The main question before the court was whether the IDEA required public schools to provide special education services to students with disabilities in the regular education classroom, rather than in separate special education settings.
The case originated when the parents of a child with a disability, known as "Olmstead," sought to have their child included in a regular education classroom with appropriate support and accommodations. The school district argued that the IDEA only required them to provide a free appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment (LRE), which they contended could be achieved through separate special education classrooms. The legal question at the center of the case was whether the IDEA mandated the inclusion of students with disabilities in the regular education classroom whenever possible, rather than segregating them into separate educational settings.
The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of Olmstead, stating that the IDEA required schools to make efforts to include students with disabilities in the regular education classroom to the maximum extent appropriate. This landmark decision had significant implications for the education of students with disabilities, promoting the concept of inclusion and recognizing the importance of providing equal educational opportunities for all students.
To know more about IDEA here:
https://brainly.com/question/15266492.
#SPJ11
Which best describes a disadvantage for the Patriots during the Revolutionary War?
Answer:
Lacks they lacked military weapon army experience navy stuff like that
Explanation:
John adam's acceptance of defeat in 1800 established the vital precedent of a peaceful transfer of power from a defeated party to its successor. group of answer choices true false
True. John Adams' acceptance of defeat in the presidential election of 1800 set a vital precedent for a peaceful transfer of power from a defeated party to its successor.
This moment was significant because it demonstrated the stability and strength of the United States' democratic system. Despite a fiercely contested election and political tensions, Adams peacefully handed over power to Thomas Jefferson, his political rival and the newly elected President. This peaceful transition of power set a crucial precedent that has been followed in subsequent U.S. presidential elections, reinforcing the democratic principles of the country.
Hence the statement is True.
To know more about John adam visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12416301
#SPJ11
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!
The Montana Constitution gives citizens the power to approve or reject almost any act of the legislature. What is the name for this method of citizen impact on a state?
A. Recall
B. Implementation
C. Referendum
D. Initiative
Answer:
D
Explanation:
What events did Matthew record that depict Jesus as a Priest?
this problem is a multiple choice
a: Jesus resisting temptation
b: Jesus quoting Scripture
c: the sacrificial death of Jesus on the cross
d: Jesus offering His blood as an atonement for sin
e: the sign that was placed on the cross "This is Jesus, Prophet and Priest of the Jews"
The events related to the priesthood of Jesus were The sacrificial death of Jesus and his offering of his blood as an atonement for sin. Even Matthew could talk about the other details, they are not related to the tasks of a priest. The priests in the ancient Israel gave to God sacrifices of animals and they entered the blood in the tabernacle as something holy for atonement. These were all foreshadowed events that the messiah accomplished perfectly
World War I proved that society and its traditional beliefs and manners had failed
True False
False. While World War I certainly had a profound impact on society and challenged traditional beliefs and manners, it did not prove that they had failed.
Rather, the war was a result of complex geopolitical factors and the failure of diplomacy and international relations. The war did lead to significant changes in society, including the emergence of new cultural movements and political ideologies.
However, it also highlighted the resilience of traditional values such as patriotism and sacrifice, which were evident in the many soldiers who fought and died for their country.
Overall, while World War I certainly had a profound impact on society and challenged many traditional beliefs and manners, it did not prove their failure. Instead, it demonstrated the complexity and challenges of modern society and the need for ongoing adaptation and resilience.
Learn more about World War I here:
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ4
How did former U.S. Senator George W. Norris achieve the change to the present structure of the Nebraska state legislature?
Answer: Former U.S. Senator George W. Norris achieved the change to the present structure of the Nebraska state legislature by introducing a constitutional amendment in 1934, which was later approved by the voters. The amendment established a nonpartisan, unicameral legislature, which replaced the previous bicameral legislature that consisted of the Nebraska House of Representatives and the Nebraska Senate. The change was seen as a way to increase efficiency and reduce partisanship in state government. Today, Nebraska remains the only state in the U.S. with a unicameral legislature.
Explanation:
Which of the following statements about Neanderthals is FALSE? Neanderthals likely buried their dead Neandertals were hunters and gatherers Neandertals were physiologically adapted to cold climates
Neandertals brains were notably smaller than those of modern humans
The false statement about Neanderthals is that their brains were notably smaller than those of modern humans.
Neanderthals were a group of ancient humans who lived in Europe and parts of Asia from around 400,000 to 40,000 years ago. They were closely related to modern humans and shared a common ancestor. While Neanderthals did have slightly larger brains on average than modern humans, the difference in size is not considered significant. In fact, studies have shown that Neanderthals had comparable cognitive abilities to early Homo sapiens.
Neanderthals likely buried their dead, indicating a level of cultural and symbolic behavior. They were indeed hunters and gatherers, relying on hunting large game animals, such as mammoths and bison, as well as gathering plant resources. Neanderthals were well-adapted to cold climates, as evidenced by their robust bodies, large nasal cavities, and stocky build, which helped them conserve heat in the colder environments they inhabited.
To learn more about Neanderthals follow:
https://brainly.com/question/1578225
#SPJ11
acres if land if they improved the land and maintained residency
The Homestead Act of 1862 granted settlers
for
years.
A 100... 10
B. 80...10
C. 160...5
D. 160...10
I need an answer ASAP!!!!
Answer:
Pretty sure it's C
Explanation:
Answer:c i think
Explanation:
T/F The passion week of Jesus life took place in the city of Nazareth since he was known as Jesus of Nazareth.
The fact that the passion week of Jesus life took place in the city named as Nazareth, since he was known as Jesus of Nazareth, is false. Because it happened in Jerusalem.
In other words, the mentioned passion week, in which jesus would die, did not take place in the ancient city of Nazareth, despite of him being from Nazareth.
As mentioned before, it occurred in Jerusalem. All this including events like the crucifixion, which are central to the Christian faith and are a significant part of the history of Christianity as a religion.
Also Jesus was believed to be the Son of God by Christians. Finally, his cult became one of the largest faiths in the world today.
Learn more about Jesus: https://brainly.com/question/20572865
#SPJ11
Help me please im on my last straw lol i have an F i need to get this right.
Historical Background For 13 days, the Soviet Union and the United States were on the brink of nuclear war. Their hostility was based on the placement of nuclear missile heads in Cuba. The conflict began shortly after the unsuccessful Bay of Pigs Invasion. Nervous about another American attack, Cuba turned to the Soviet Union. In July 1962, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev and Cuban leader Fidel Castro reached an arrangement in which ballistic missiles were placed in Cuba in order to prevent American aggression. Meanwhile, in the United States, the government was denying allegations that it had been paying no heed to the placement of nuclear missiles 90 miles away from Florida. To confirm that the Soviet Union and Cuba were indeed a threat, an American U-2 plane captured aerial photographs of various launch sites. As a response, the United States established a military blockade around Cuba. This tactic was used to stop the Soviet Union from bringing nuclear missiles into Cuba. In addition, the United States wanted the Soviet Union to disassemble the current weapons and send them back home. After several excruciating days of negotiating, Khrushchev and President John F. Kennedy came to a decision. The Soviets would remove their ballistic missile heads from Cuba in exchange for the United States promising to never invade Cuba. In addition, the United States would remove weapons they had placed in Italy and Turkey. The threat of nuclear war was subdued.
Using the document provided and your knowledge of Modern World History, why was the conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union known as a cold war?
Answer:
The Cold War was known for being a cold war because nothing really heated up between the 2 nations to get to a full scale nuclear war.
Explanation:
Both the US and the USSR both knew that they have many countries by their side along with many nuclear bombs that if detonated, would've meant the end of the world.
Why was the first Battle of Bull Run significant?
It was a major Union victory which left the South with no chance of winning the war.
It was the first major battle fought in the North and proved the South could fight anywhere.
It was the last major battle of the war and proved that the South would never give up.
It was the first major battle and proved the war was going to be tougher than many people thought.
Answer:
it was the first major battle and proved the war was going to be tougher than many people thought.
Explanation:
This is the answer because after this battle countries realized that the war was not going to be quick and easy
There is evidence of people living in China dating back to 12,000 B.C. True False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
In the United States, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was passed during the 1970s following revelations that
In the United States, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was passed during the 1970s following revelations that U.S companies had bribed government officials in foreign countries in an attempt to win lucrative contracts.
What is Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), enacted in 1977, generally prohibits the payment of bribes to foreign officials to assist in obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA can apply to prohibited conduct anywhere in the world and extends to publicly traded companies and their officers, directors, employees, stockholders, and agents. Agents can include third party agents, consultants, distributors, joint-venture partners, and others.
Its purpose was to prohibit US individuals and firms from paying bribes to foreign officials to get lucrative contracts. The law doesn't sets any limit on the bribery payment for punishment. It applies to the actions of US nationals that occur worldwide and to prevent abuse of power and corruption. The FCPA supervises the actions of directors, shareholders and officers of publicly traded companies.
Learn more about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act on:
brainly.com/question/14405254
#SPJ4
The tape measure was originally invented for what fashion item?.
Answer:
hoop skirts
Explanation:
what was general howe's reasoning in abandoning the original british plan for the northern campaigns by moving south and capturing philadelphia?
General Howe reasoned that capturing Philadelphia would draw American forces and weaken the American cause, boosting the British one.
General Howe's Plan to Capture PhiladelphiaGeneral Howe believed that the British had a greater chance of success if they moved south and captured the American capital of Philadelphia. He reasoned that if the American forces were drawn to Philadelphia, they would be more likely to focus their attention and resources on protecting the city rather than trying to protect the North. Additionally, Howe thought that if the British were to successfully capture Philadelphia, it would help to weaken the American cause and bolster the British one.
Learn more about Philadelphia: https://brainly.com/question/20375264
#SPJ4
Idk if my answer were right. I need clarification
Answer:
I think so
Explanation:
Kelsey is thinking about the problem she has with not knowing how to ride a bike with two wheels. She is writing down ideas to help solve her problem, like practicing, wearing protective gear, and watching others to learn. These are all examples of her doing what?
A. Evaluating the effectiveness of the solution
B. Considering advantages and disadvantages
C. Identifying the problem
D. Listing options to find a solution
What was a primary goal of carpetbaggers and scalawags following the Civil War?
to do away with the plantation economy in the South
to support reconstruction efforts in southern states
to run third-party candidates in southern states
to intimidate Republican voters in the South
Answer: to support reconstruction efforts in southern states
Explanation: hope this helps :)
Public concerts from the concert des amateurs in paris in the 1770s were presented by which conductor?
The Public concerts presented by the Concert des Amateurs in Paris in the 1770s were conducted by the Chevalier de Saint-Georges.
Who is Chevalier de Saint-Georges?
He was a Creole virtuoso violinist and the conductor of the leading symphony orchestra and classical composer in Paris.
As he was born in the then French colony of Guadeloupe, he was also the son of Georges de Bologne Saint-Georges who is a wealthy married planter and an African slave woman.
Hence, he conducted the Public concerts presented by the Concert des Amateurs in Paris in the 1770s.
Read more about Saint-Georges
brainly.com/question/25953425
#SPJ1
why is this right tell me asap i need an answer for the teacher
Answer: because it's was a very ancient greek back then and it was also famous
Explanation:
does anyone know what caused the southern secession
Answer:
Many maintain that the primary cause of the war was the Southern states' desire to preserve the institution of slavery. Others minimize slavery and point to other factors, such as taxation or the principle of States' Rights. Two major themes emerge in these documents: slavery and states' rights.
Answer:Many maintain that the primary cause of the war was the Southern states' desire to preserve the institution of slavery. Others minimize slavery and point to other factors, such as taxation or the principle of States' Rights. ... Two major themes emerge in these documents: slavery and states' rights.
Explanation:Many maintain that the primary cause of the war was the Southern states' desire to preserve the institution of slavery. Others minimize slavery and point to other factors, such as taxation or the principle of States' Rights. ... Two major themes emerge in these documents: slavery and states' rights.
How is Manifest Destiny similar to the "the White Man's Burden"?|
I
Answer:
Picking up where Manifest Destiny leaves off, the concept of the White Man's Burden not only justifies expansion, it presents the colonization of people as a noble enterprise
Explanation:
sorry if this isnt the answer if u werent looking for :(
which of the following has been advanced as a possible explanation for the origins of the first civilizations?
One of the possible explanation for the origins of the first civilizations is that the availability of surplus resources allowed some individuals to become skilled at non-subsistence activities.
A civilization is a complex society that is characterized by urban development, social stratification, a centralized government, complex forms of economic and political organization, cultural innovations, writing systems, and some kind of symbolic communication system, such as art and architecture. It is considered to be a more advanced form of social organization than a tribe or a band.
The exact factors that led to the rise of civilizations are not entirely understood, but scholars have put forth a number of theories. One of the theories is that the availability of surplus resources allowed some individuals to become skilled at non-subsistence activities. This led to the development of specialized labor and the emergence of social classes and hierarchies.
To learn more about Civilizations visit here:
brainly.com/question/12207844
#SPJ11
Why are the authors discussed in lesson 4.03 important to American History?
Answer:
Following are the solution to these question:
Explanation:
It is known in North America in the history of the United States. After the Revolutionary War was won, their writers of the lectures, 4.03 are significant to American History, which started a new land, the first community of founders that were born and brought up in America, reading on topics and issues in America.
Answer:
its known in the history of the United States. After the Revolutionary War was succeeded, their writers of the lectures, 4.03 are important to US History, which started a new land, the first community of founders that were born and brought up in United States, reading on topics and problems in the US.
Explanation:
i need help asap!!! someone pls give me the answer
One political tension created between the South and the North through the Missouri Compromise was that Congress refused to admit any new slave states to the Union, as Option B shows.
What was the Missouri Compromise?It was an agreement between the southern and northern states.It was the agreement that allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state and Maine as a free state.The Missouri Compromise determined the limits of slavery in the USA, considering the geographic location between the states.
Although this commitment was intended to reduce tension between Southerners and Northerners, this tension increased because Congress did not admit new slave states, which strengthened the union and disfavored the confederation.
Learn more about the Missouri Commitment:
https://brainly.com/question/14020956
#SPJ1
definition of axis powers us history
The Axis Powers in US history were the alliance of Germany, Italy, and Japan during World War II, opposing the Allied Powers.
The Axis Powers in US refers to the alliance formed during World War II that consisted of Germany, Italy, and Japan. These countries joined forces in opposition to the Allied Powers, which included the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union. The Axis Powers shared a common ideology of expansionism and sought to exert their influence and control over various regions through military aggression. The alliance dissolved as the Allied Powers gained the upper hand in the war, resulting in the defeat and subsequent occupation of the Axis Powers by the victorious Allies.In conclusion, the Axis Powers played a significant role in shaping the course of World War II and their defeat by the Allied Powers marked a turning point in history, leading to the post-war geopolitical landscape.
For more questions on Axis Powers in US:
https://brainly.com/question/13199185
#SPJ8