While reviewing for exams, a teacher knows that the number of topics he can cover is directly proportional to the length of time he has to review. If he can cover 9 topics in a single 45-minute period, how many topics can he cover in a 1-hour period?

Answer:

5 miles

Explanation:

Answer:

about 5 miles, or 4.97097

Explanation:

Answer:OPTION B) 2ab

Explanation:Side of larger square = (a + b) units

Side of smaller square = c units

To Find:

The area of all four triangles combined = ?

Solution:

a^2 + b^2 = c^2       (Pythagoras theorem) -(1)

The area of all four triangles combined = Area of larger square - Area of smaller square

The area of all four triangles combined = (a + b)^2 - c^2

The area of all four triangles combined = a^2 + b^2 + 2ab - (a^2 + b^2)    {By (1)}

The area of all four triangles combined = a^2 + b^2 + 2ab - a^2 - b^2

The area of all four triangles combined = a^2 - a^2 + b^2 - b^2 + 2ab

Therefore, The area of all four triangles combined = 2ab sq. units

The descriptions that were given about the setting of the story chechnya is about;

According to this question, we were to give the descriptions that were given about the setting of the story chechnya.

As a result of this we can see that Caucasus republic as a result of their rebellion act to later came back as part of Russia as as a semi-autonomous state.

Learn more about story at;

https://brainly.com/question/21400963

Answer:isotopes is atom which has the same element with same number of proton but different number of nuetron

Explanation:hope this helpp

We will see that for t = 3 seconds the object will be at rest.

We say that something is at rest if its velocity is equal to zero.

Here we know that the position equation of the object is:

x(t) = 7 + 6*t - t^2

To get the velocity, we need to differentiate with respect to the time, using the rule:

\(f(x) = a*x^n\\\\f'(x) = n*a*x^{n-1}\)

We will get:

v(t) = 6 - 2*t

Now we just need to find the value of t such that the above equation is equal to zero:

0 = 6 - 2*t

2*t = 6

t = 6/2 = 3

Then for t = 3 seconds, the object will be at rest.

If you want to learn more about motion equations, you can read:

https://brainly.com/question/19365526

Answer:3

t=

Explanation:

An object being at rest indicates the velocity is 0. Set the derivative of the equation equal to zero. (0=6-2t) Subtract 6 from both sides (-6=-2t) and then divide by negative 2 to get t=3, meaning the object is at rest at

The conflict of character versus nature is an external conflict in literature. It is frequently represented as a person battling the environment, including natural disasters, wild animals, or the natural world's destructive side.

In The Grasshopper and The Ant, this conflict ties into the story's theme in a variety of ways.

To begin with, the narrative depicts how nature, in this case, the environment, can have an impact on our lives. Throughout the story, the grasshopper avoids the ant's attempts to prepare for the winter, preferring to sing and dance.

When the winter arrives, the grasshopper is caught unprepared and ends up hungry and freezing. The story's moral teaches readers that being ill-prepared can be disastrous, especially when it comes to nature. It also highlights the importance of being proactive in preparing for the worst.

Another way the character versus nature conflict ties into the story's theme is by highlighting the ant's perseverance and hard work. Despite the harsh circumstances, the ant remains determined and dedicated to his goal of preparing for the winter. This serves as an inspiration to readers to persevere even in the most challenging situations.

Furthermore, the story shows how nature can be both harsh and benevolent. The grasshopper suffers due to the harsh winter, but the ant's hard work also pays off in the end when he can enjoy the fruits of his labor. This teaches readers that nature can both give and take away.

Finally, the conflict of character versus nature in The Grasshopper and The Ant serves to teach readers about the importance of balance. The ant's hard work and preparation are admirable, but the grasshopper's love of life and music is also crucial. This emphasizes that while it's essential to be prepared, it's also necessary to enjoy life and not take it for granted.

For more such questions on conflict, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/26202241

#SPJ8

Any unpleasant aspects of the mayor's illness are discreetly concealed by the sentence's euphemism.

Crew members and passengers would retreat to their cabins below deck during storms on heavy seas as the wind picked up and the water got turbulent in order to weather the storm and prevent motion sickness. They essentially leave for a place that is "under the weather" by doing this.

A word or phrase that demystifies a difficult subject is known as a euphemism. It alludes to a circumstance without actually facing it by using figurative language. Saying they are between jobs, for instance, is a popular euphemism for being unemployed if someone has just been fired.

To know more about euphemism visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/18210452

#SPJ4

Answer:

Without the support of modern genetics and molecular biology, Mendel was able to discern fundamental rules of inheritance that still hold true today.

This sentence from the passage supports the idea that Mendel's discoveries were the result of hard work rather than chance. It highlights the fact that Mendel was able to discern fundamental rules of inheritance through his own efforts, even without the support of modern genetics and molecular biology. This suggests that Mendel's discoveries were the result of intentional and deliberate experimentation and observation, rather than luck or happenstance.

name five influences that guide the decisions that you make.

Answer:

Helpfull will be the adjective

Answer: HELPFUL WILL BE IT

Explanation:

Answer:

what are the options for the answer?

Explanation:

when you factor it, it would be 4(x-1) (x+4) -- this is the correct answer, so it is not this.

Answer:

50 and 50

Explanation:

2 halfs make a whole

Answer:

The three policymakers are expressing different views on what a just distribution of the national cake entails, which could stem from different perspectives, values, and beliefs about justice and fairness.

The first policymaker believes in equal distribution, which implies that everyone should receive the same amount of resources regardless of their needs, abilities, and contributions. This perspective is based on the principle of equality, which holds that all individuals are equal and should be treated equally. It seeks to address inequalities and reduce poverty by leveling the playing field and ensuring that everyone has equal opportunities to access basic necessities.

The second policymaker believes in fair distribution, which implies that resources should be distributed in a way that takes into account individual differences and needs. This perspective is based on the principle of fairness, which holds that individuals should be treated in a manner that is consistent with their needs and contributions. It seeks to address inequalities by ensuring that resources are distributed in a way that is proportionate to individual needs and contributions.

The third policymaker believes in giving everyone their due, which implies that individuals should receive what they are entitled to based on their rights and responsibilities. This perspective is based on the principle of distributive justice, which holds that individuals should receive what they are entitled to based on their rights and responsibilities. It seeks to address inequalities by ensuring that individuals receive what they are entitled to based on their rights and responsibilities.

Making progress in such a scenario would require policymakers to find common ground and find ways to balance the principles of equality, fairness, and distributive justice. One way to make progress would be to engage in open and honest discussions to understand each other's perspectives and concerns. This would involve listening actively, asking questions, and seeking to understand the reasoning behind each policymaker's views.

Another way to make progress would be to engage in a thorough analysis of the available data and evidence on the current distribution of resources in the country. This would help policymakers to understand the extent of inequalities and the factors that contribute to them. This information would then be used to develop evidence-based policies that address inequalities and ensure a just distribution of the national cake.

A third way to make progress would be to engage in stakeholder consultations and gather the views of various groups in society, including representatives from different communities, civil society organizations, and business groups. This would provide a broad perspective on the issues and would help policymakers to understand the impact of their policies on different groups in society.

Finally, policymakers could also consider the use of multi-stakeholder partnerships, where various groups in society come together to address common problems and find mutually beneficial solutions. This would help to build trust, foster collaboration, and ensure that everyone has a voice in the policymaking process.

In conclusion, finding a just distribution of the national cake is a complex challenge that requires policymakers to balance the principles of equality, fairness, and distributive justice. By engaging in open and honest discussions, conducting evidence-based analysis, engaging in stakeholder consultations, and using multi-stakeholder partnerships, policymakers can make progress and ensure a just distribution of the national cake.

Answer:

Explanation:

The three policymakers in this scenario have different views on how to ensure a just distribution of the national cake. One believes that an equal distribution is just, another believes in a fair distribution, and the third believes that a just distribution entails giving everyone their due. These differences in perspective could be due to several factors, including their background, values, and life experiences.

The policymaker who believes in an equal distribution may come from a background where equal sharing is emphasized, or they may have a strong belief in equality and social justice. This perspective assumes that everyone has equal needs and that an equal distribution is the most just way to meet those needs.

On the other hand, the policymaker who believes in a fair distribution may take into account factors such as people's needs, abilities, and contributions to society. They may believe that people who contribute more to society should receive a larger share of the national cake or that people with greater needs should receive a larger share to help them meet those needs.

The policymaker who believes in giving everyone their due may believe in a merit-based distribution, where individuals receive a share of the national cake based on their efforts or contributions to society. This perspective assumes that individuals should be rewarded based on their merit and that a just distribution should not be based on equal or fair sharing alone.

To make progress in this scenario, the policymakers need to first recognize and respect each other's perspectives. They can then work towards finding a compromise that takes into account the strengths and limitations of each perspective.

One possible approach is to adopt a hybrid approach that combines elements of each perspective. For example, they could agree to distribute the national cake equally among all citizens, but also provide additional resources to those with greater needs or who have contributed more to society.

Another approach is to identify common values and principles that underpin each perspective, such as social justice, fairness, and merit. They could then use these values to guide their decision-making and ensure that the distribution is in line with these principles.

Finally, it is important to recognize that a just distribution of the national cake requires more than just a fair or equal distribution of resources. It also requires addressing the underlying social, economic, and political structures that create inequality and limit opportunities for some individuals and groups. Therefore, the policymakers need to work towards creating a more just and equitable society by addressing these structural issues.

Answer:

probably

Explanation:

there are a lot of people

You must be aware that the distance between two points in this scenario could be interpreted as a line. You can use the formula to calculate the length of this line.

The distance between two things, points, lines, etc., expressed as a noun. The state of being physically remote from someone or something else is known as remoteness. a line drawn in the universe. To walk 7 miles for one hour would be too time-consuming. a separation; a room: There was a large amount of water surrounding the ship.

Calculation

d: √ [(x2 - x1) ^ 2 + (y2 - y1) ^ 2]

Example,

for points (1.0, 2.0) and (1.0, 5.0):

d: √ [(1 - 1) ^ 2 + (5 - 2) ^ 2]

d: 3.0

Answer:

the distance between point (x1, y1) and point (x2, y2) is:

d: √ [(x2 - x1) ^ 2 + (y2 - y1) ^ 2]

To know more about distance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8853683

#SPJ4

Answer: You subtract 5 from each x coordinate, and plot it on the graph. Or in other terms move each x coordinate 5 to the left.

Explanation: For example if i take one x coordinate and substitute it into f(x+5). In this explanation ill use (6,3). The transformation would change it to (1,3). Because we subtract 5 from the x coordinate.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

We cannot answer that question, b/c we need the chart.

Explanation:

A bathroom scale on Jupiter would show a weight of 125 kg for a 50-kg person.

On the upper surface of Jupiter's atmosphere, where the attractive force of gravity is 2.5 times that on Earth, a bathroom scale would show a different weight for a 50-kg person compared to Earth. To calculate the weight on Jupiter, we can use the formula:

Weight on Jupiter = Mass × Acceleration due to Gravity on Jupiter

The acceleration due to gravity on Jupiter is 2.5 times that on Earth, so we can multiply the person's mass by this factor:

Weight on Jupiter = 50 kg × 2.5

Weight on Jupiter = 125 kg

Therefore, a bathroom scale on Jupiter would show a weight of 125 kg for a 50-kg person. It's important to note that this weight measurement is relative to Jupiter's gravity and may not reflect the actual mass of the person.

For more such questions on Jupiter,click on

https://brainly.com/question/31323071

#SPJ8

Answer:

There were

Explanation:

When I looked up the stars, I couldn't believe it was so many light-years away

When I looked up the stars, I couldn't believe there were so many light-years away

Past tense

A function of the form \(f(x) = x^{-n}\), wherein n is a natural number, is regarded as a negative power function. Inside the form, we might also put \(f(x)\),that is\(f(x) = \frac{1}{x^n}\),and the further calculation can be defied as follows:

Given:

\(\bold{a)\ \sin 120^{\circ}}\\\\\bold{b)\ \sin 150^{\circ}}\\\\\bold{c)\ \cos 235^{\circ}}\\\\\bold{d)\ \cos 300^{\circ}}\\\\\)

To find:

Find negative function values =?

Solution:

\(\therefore \\\\\to \bold{\sin (180- \theta)= \sin \theta} \\\\\to \bold{\cos (180- \theta)= -\cos \theta} \\\\\to \bold{\cos (180+ \theta)= -\cos \theta} \\\\ \to \bold{\cos (360- \theta)= \cos \theta}\)

Solve value for a:

\(\to \bold{\sin 120^{\circ}= \sin(180-60)}\)

                  \(\bold{=\sin 60^{\circ}}\\\\\bold{=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}}\\\\\)

Solve value for b:

\(\to \bold{\sin 150^{\circ}= \sin(180-30)}\)

                  \(\bold{=\sin 30^{\circ}}\\\\\bold{=\frac{1}{2}}\\\\\)

Solve value for c:

\(\to \bold{\cos 235^{\circ}=-\cos( 180+55)}\)              

                  \(\bold{=- \cos 55^{\circ}}\\\\\bold{= -0.57357643635}}\\\\\)

Solve value for d:

\(\to \bold{\cos 300^{\circ}= \cos(360-60)}\)

                  \(\bold{= \cos 60^{\circ}}\\\\\bold{= \frac{1}{2}}\\\\\)

Therefore, the final answer is "Option C".

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/24581443

The specific policies regarding the use of SAT/ACT scores for college admissions can vary from school to school. It's best to consult with your school's admissions office or check their official website to understand their specific requirements and policies.

In general, many schools consider the highest score achieved by an applicant, also known as superscoring. Superscoring involves considering the highest section scores from multiple test administrations to calculate a composite or total score. This allows students to showcase their best performance across multiple test sittings.

However, some schools may have different policies and may consider the most recent score or use a different method to evaluate test scores. It's important to reach out to your school's admissions office or refer to their official documentation to determine how they handle SAT/ACT scores for admissions purposes.

To learn more about SAT/ACT:

https://brainly.com/question/11204061

the prophet Muhammad is called Allah

Answer:

Have a female health care worker present.

Explanation:

A female health care provider should be present to observe an examination performed by a male health care provider. Leaving the door open and informing the girl's friends about her condition violates her right to privacy and confidentiality. Although the suspected attacker should be kept away from the examination room, having a female health care worker present during the examination best protects the girl's rights.

Answer:

Explanation:

If 425 divided by a prime number n leaves a remainder of 17, we can write the equation 425 = n * q + 17, where q is some integer. If 50 is also divided by n with a remainder of r, we can write the equation 50 = n * s + r, where s is some integer.

Since 425 and 50 both leave the same remainder when divided by n, we can set these two equations equal to each other and solve for r:

425 = n * q + 17

50 = n * s + r

Subtracting 17 from both sides of the first equation gives us:

408 = n * q

Then subtracting 50 from both sides of the second equation gives us:

-8 = n * s - n

Adding n to both sides gives us:

0 = n * s

Since n is a prime number, it must be the case that s = 0. Therefore, r = 50.

So the remainder when 50 is divided by n is 50.

Lipids are protecting his car because their nonpolar nature makes them insoluble in water.

To learn more about Lipid refer,

https://brainly.com/question/24331942

#SPJ4

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The correct answer is (ii) and (iii) are correct statements but not (i).

Explanation:

(i) states that the probability of getting four heads in four tosses of a coin is 1/4 or 0.25, which is incorrect. The probability of getting four heads in four tosses of a fair coin is (1/2)^4 = 1/16 = 0.0625.

(ii) states that the probability of getting four heads in four tosses of a coin is 1/8 or 0.125, which is correct. The probability of getting four heads in four tosses of a fair coin is (1/2)^4 = 1/16 = 0.0625, which is equal to 1/8.

(iii) is a correct statement and is known as the addition rule for mutually exclusive events. It states that if two events A and B are mutually exclusive, meaning that they cannot occur at the same time, then the probability of either A or B occurring is equal to the sum of their individual probabilities, i.e., P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B).

Answer:

heyyyy.........

Explanation:

Thank U :)

Answer:

Explanation:

This is probably not a good question to answer. The reason is that we don't know why you want to know. I think it is a privacy issue. You can find her yourself using friends.