Write at least one page describing your topic and topic question; state your position on the topic (pro or con?) homelessness
Answer:
Homelessness refers to the state of not having a fixed and stable place to live. It is a complex issue that affects individuals and families from all walks of life, and can be caused by a variety of factors including poverty, unemployment, mental illness, substance abuse, and family breakdown.
Homeless individuals can be found living on the streets, in shelters, or in temporary accommodations such as cars or abandoned buildings. They often lack access to basic necessities such as food, clothing, and healthcare, and face a wide range of challenges related to their living situation, including violence, exploitation, and discrimination.
Homelessness can have significant negative impacts on physical and mental health, as well as on social and economic outcomes. Homeless individuals often face barriers to employment and education, which can make it difficult for them to break out of the cycle of poverty and homelessness.
Addressing homelessness requires a multifaceted approach that involves addressing the root causes of homelessness, providing housing and support services to those in need, and addressing social and economic inequalities that contribute to homelessness. It also requires a commitment to treating homeless individuals with dignity and respect, and recognizing their right to access basic human rights and necessities.
I HOPE THIS WILL HELP YOU OUT :))
Write an essay:
Why has there been a rise in crime in our country and what can law enforcement do to reduce it?
The rise in crime in South Africa, high levels of poverty and inequality, unemployment, social disintegration, substance abuse, inadequate education and social support systems, and weak law enforcement and criminal justice systems.
How to reduce crime in South Africa ?To curtail crime, law enforcement agencies can employ a range of strategies. First and foremost, they can prioritize community policing approaches, fostering collaborations with local communities to cultivate trust, enhance communication, and collaborate on crime prevention initiatives.
This entails engaging community members actively, establishing neighborhood watch programs, and implementing outreach initiatives to tackle underlying social issues.
Find out more on South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/31152480
#SPJ1
One of the mistakes that was made in both the JonBenet Ramsey and Lizzie Borden cases was:
A. suspects were not interviewed
B. crime scene was not closed down
C. ransom notes were mishandled
D. no evidence was collected
Answer:B
Explanation:
Multiple civilians came into both crime scenes.
IF YOU HIT A PARKED CAR AND CANNOT FIND THE OWNER, YOU:
A. Need to do nothing if the damage is only slight
B. Must leave a note on or in the car
b is the answer the other is crime
(a) Kafui agreed to pay Basabasa GH¢5,000.00 if he performed his duties as a second mate on an STC Bus travelling from Accra Ghana to Lagos Nigeria. Basabasa proceeded to act as mate on the Bus, but died a day before the bus arrived at Lagos – Nigeria. Alomo, the widow of Basabasa wants to take action in court to recover a portion of the agreed sum. As a lawyer advise her using relevant case law.
Answer:
what is the question
Explanation:
Question 10 (1 point)
A man has been charged with the crime of murder after a heated scuffle with his neighbor over the holidays. What court would
MOST likely be the location of the man's trial?
Court of General Jurisdiction
State Supreme Court
Court of Limited Jurisdiction
Appellate Court
Answer: state supreme court
Explanation:
Answer:
A) Court of General Jurisdiction
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer is because they usually deal with the larger cases such as murder or drug crimes. This is shown by 10+ sources I found. I would like to note that if this is wrong then I am sorry, however, I hope this answer helped! Have a great day :)
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
Which idea is an example of voter suppression?
voting by mail
passing voter ID laws
opening polling places on Sunday
helping people register to vote
Passing voter ID laws idea is an example of voter suppression. Thus, the correct option is B.
What is voter suppression?Voter suppression, in American history and politics, is any legal or illegal action taken or tactic employed with the intention of preventing a specific racial group, political party, or religious community from voting or registering to vote.
In the US, African Americans have made up the vast majority of voter suppression victims.
Since at least the conclusion of Reconstruction, when African Americans in the states of the former Confederacy were momentarily free to exercise their newly earned rights to vote, compete for local, state, and federal offices, and serve on juries, voter suppression has been a problem in the United States.
Learn more about voter suppression, here
https://brainly.com/question/14231768
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP QUICK!!
Describe a scenario where a property owner might argue that his property is being “taken” from him by a local government because of a restriction that is put on the land. Now describe what the competing “public use” of the restriction would be.
A quarrel may be formulated by a landowner directing the dispute at the local government if they impose a zoning decree, namely if it restrains the use of his property.
What is an example?For instance, when the district decides to use it exclusively for residential purposes, the owner may feel he is being shortchanged on its value and actual utilization.
Conversely, an affirmatory case from the "public benefit" viewpoint could maintain that such regulation is essential for maintaining the safety, health, and welfare of everyone in the area.
These rules seek to reconcile the rights of personal ownership with general communal benefit through organized and productive land use, countering overcrowding, and impeding any types of nuisance or potentially perilous pursuits.
Read more about property rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/9052855
#SPJ1
What maneuvers are required on a driving exam?
(please list all maneuvers, not a couple)
Answer:
Three Point Turn. Turn car around in a 20–40 foot space.
Approach of Crossing. Get in the proper lane and look in each direction.
Yield Right-of-Way. Allow pedestrians to cross, pull over and stop for emergency vehicles, and don’t enter an intersection where you will interfere with other traffic.
Straight-In Parking. When properly parked, the vehicle should be centered inside the space with no part of the vehicle extending out in the traffic lane.
Parking on a Grade. Proper parking for uphill and downhill, with and without a curb.
Stop Quickly. Make a quick, safe stop when the examiner/agent instructs you.
Backing. Back a distance of 50 feet at a slow speed while looking to the rear. Do not use the rear-view mirror or rear-view camera monitor.
Obey Stop Signs. Approach in the proper lane, come to a complete stop before reaching the stop line or crosswalk, and remain stopped until you can move safely.
Obey Traffic Signals. Get into the proper lane and approach the light at a speed that will allow you to stop if the light should change. When the light turns green, do not move forward until traffic has cleared the intersection.
Signal and Turn. Get into the proper lane and signal your turn for the last 100 feet. You may use either hand signals or mechanical signals.
Passing. Always look ahead and behind to make sure you can pass safely.
Stay in Proper Lane. Drive in the right lane except on a one-way street. Do not change lanes until you may do so safely.
Follow at a Safe Distance. Do not follow too closely behind other cars. Keep a minimum following distance of four seconds.
Use Proper Posture. Keep both hands on the steering wheel and do not rest your elbow in the window.
Explanation:
ease gimme brainliest
Crashes caused by speeding vehicles killed people in 2009 .
Answer:
is this a question or an answer cause i am confused
take my money ok just do it
Answer:
\(awwwwwww \: how \: sweet \: lol \\ thank \: u \: soo \: much \\ have \: a \: good \: evening + night\)
Identify two reasons Justice Brennan gave for dissenting in this decision.
Answer:
He argues that the idea of censorship of students due to person not thinking of it as inappropriate was declared unworthy by the tinker case and that by stopping students from using this freedom of expression they are then stripped of being exposed to differing opinions and will not understand how the real world operates.
Explanation:
Brennan used to opine that the law should preserve the dignity of the individuals he spoke for the establishment of the first amendment for the freedom of speech.
He was against the government oppression against the constitutional right of freedom of speech. He supported the idea of free exercise and adaptability of religion of choice.Learn more about freedom of speech:
https://brainly.com/question/2696695
Explain what happens to the gravitational force between two objects if
(a) The mass of one object is doubled,
(b) The distance between the object is tripled.
Please its aurgent
1) As Force is directly proportional to the mass of each object, the force will be doubled.
2) distance is doubled, Force will become 1/4th as Force is inversely proportional to the square of distance.
d is tripled. Force will become 1/9th as force is inversely proportional to the square of distance
Explain each of the three branches of government. What are their duties and responsibilities?
What role do they play in the system of checks and balances?
Answer:
The Legislative Branch makes the laws. The Executive Branch enforces the laws. The Judicial Branch interprets the laws.
One can not survive without the others because they reliy on echother.
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ..
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ask for help, go for rehabilitation or report yourself to the authority.
What is the issue of drinking and driving about?Alcohol has an impact on the areas of your brain that manage your skill and judgment. The more alcohol you consume, the worse you get at things.
Drinking and driving may seem like a good idea when you're intoxicated, but even small amounts of alcohol can affect your reaction times and cause double or blurred vision, which puts you in danger when operating a vehicle. You run the danger of causing an accident while intoxicated, leaving you with a totaled vehicle and a large insurance claim.
Learn more about drinking and driving from
https://brainly.com/question/1173942
#SPJ1
Mr. Gary has damaged the Cadillac car of Mr. Hope. Mr. Hope wants to file a suit against Mr. Gary. In order for State Court or Federal Court to hear the case:
Answer:
evidence
Explanation:
he must have the prove and evidence
How does court congestion impact deterrence to crime?
Answer:
An additional complexity is that the deterrent effects of legal punishment may be contingent.
Explanation:
An additional complexity is that the deterrent effects of legal punishment may be contingent.
how many years does it take mars to complete it axis?
Who is the richest man alive in the world?
How can a boy at the age of 14 prepare to become a future engineer
Answer:
1) 1.881
2) Elon Musk
3) Start programming
Program everything u can
Practice making an alarm clock
Make a calculator
Make a budgetin application
The key to being a good software engineer is not being afraid to learn new things, such as languages or methods you’ve never used before.
Build your skills
Research types of engineering
How does Article III protect the political rights of judges? Of individuals?
Answer:
in our unique judicial system, courts are protected from the influence of other branches of government, as well as shifting popular opinion. ... This allows the judiciary to make decisions based on what is right under the law, without political or personal consequences.
Explanation:
HELP FAST PLEASE
i'll mark you brainliest
How do we investigate contemporary Supreme Court cases to understand and influence legal arguments and decisions?
Answer:
There are a few ways to investigate contemporary Supreme Court cases. One way is to read summaries of the cases from a variety of sources, including newspapers, legal journals, and online news sources. Another way is to read the full text of the Supreme Court opinion, which is available online on the court's website. Finally, it is also possible to watch or listen to audio recordings of the oral arguments in the case, which are also available on the court's website.
The constitutional guarantee of a free press has resulted in
A. a government more likely to hide its actions from the people
B. a government more responsive to the needs of the people
C. the establishment of English as the official language of the United States
D. the establishment of government-run news organization
A government that is more receptive to the needs of the people is the result of the free press provision provided by the constitution.
What is constitution?The American Constitution is considered to be the country's highest law. In 1789, the original constitution of the country, the Articles of Confederation, was replaced. It defines the scope of the country and the limitations on the powers of the executive and legislative branches. The Constitution outlines the three main federal government branches, their respective powers, and sets forth the fundamental legislation that governs the United States federal government. The first ten Constitutional Amendments are collectively known as the Bill of Rights. It explains how Americans should interact with their government. Freedom of speech, the press, and religion are just a few of the civil rights and liberties that are guaranteed to the individual.To learn more about constitution, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
Who is responsible for serving jury duty?
Answer:
anyone above the age of 18 and enrolled to vote.
Explanation:
being able to serve as a juror gives peoples of a community the opportunity to play an active role in the administration of justice.
BRAINLIEST
What do you think are some ways police officers and the community can work together to prevent crime?
Answer:
having like guards watches or longer penalties for crimes
Explanation:
Do the philosophies established in the "broken windows" section of the article hold up as true
Answer: No
Explanation:
The broken windows theory was a mere academic theory it does not possess any link with the criminal prosecution in practice. According to James Q. Wilson and George Kelling (1982) used the terms "broken windows" for representing the disorder in the neighborhood. This theory links the disorder with crime. The disorder may create fear and fear can lead to breakdown of social controls. This can lead to community cohesion and responsible for crime. But there is no evidence given which could prove the authenticity of the theory.
Does participation affect the prevalent culture of a group?
Answer:
groups together and enables them to not only co- exist, but also to live and work together for the common good. In an inclusive society, such a set of values.
Explanation:
so in my own opinion it merely cannot affect any prevalent culture of a group, participation in fact! may give them necessary benefits.
Answer:
Recent advances in technologies (mostly personal computers and the Internet) have enabled private persons to create and publish such media, usually through the Internet.[2] Since the technology now enables new forms of expression and engagement in public discourse, participatory culture not only supports individual creation but also informal relationships that pair novices with experts.[3] This new culture as it relates to the Internet has been described as Web 2.0.[4] In participatory culture "young people creatively respond to a plethora of electronic signals and cultural commodities in ways that surprise their makers, finding meanings and identities never meant to be there and defying simple nostrums that bewail the manipulation or passivity of "consumers."[2]
The increasing access to the Internet has come to play an integral part in the expansion of participatory culture because it increasingly enables people to work collaboratively; generate and disseminate news, ideas, and creative works; and connect with people who share similar goals and interests (see affinity groups). The potential of participatory culture for civic engagement and creative expression has been investigated by media scholar Henry Jenkins. In 2006, Jenkins and co-authors Ravi Purushotma, Katie Clinton, Margaret Weigel and Alice Robison authored a white paper entitled Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century.[5] This paper describes a participatory culture as one:
Someone else can drive your car if _____.
A. you have proof of residency
B. they have proof of insurance
C. they have proof of residency
D. you have proof of insurance
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.
Our constitution is called a democracy because power is in the hands not of a minority but of the whole people. When it is a question of settling private disputes, everyone is equal before the law.
Which constitutional principle is BEST described by Pericles?
A. individual rights
B. rule of law
C. limited government
D. representative government
whats your opinion about S7 bill?
People are concerned about the S-7 Bill because it gives law enforcement excessive influence over people's privacy. For example, if S-7 becomes law, a Canadian customs officer might demand that a traveler's digital device be searched based on "reasonable general suspicion" that the Customs Act may be violated.
What are the issues with the S-7 Bill?Senate Bill S-7 (An Act to Amend the Customs Act and the Preclearance Act) has slipped under most Canadians' attention, and it, like so many other measures this year, is intent on intruding on Canadian rights. In this instance, privacy.
While S-7 appears to be a quiet parliamentary housekeeping bill on the surface, it contains provisions that will result in catastrophic breaches of privacy for Canadians traveling abroad.
Learn more about Bills:
https://brainly.com/question/11510660
#SPJ1
8. What is the difference between an arrest and a booking?
Answer:
Down below
Explanation:
An arrest is when you put the handcuffs on the person and read them their rights. You are formally accusing the person of committing a crime and placing them in police custody. A booking is when you you do things like mugshots and get their personal information to put into the record.
Haven't done criminal justice in a while, so I hope this is right. Good luck! :)