Why did Congress have so much trouble passing laws under the terms of
the Articles of Confederation?

Answer: The driver of the vehicle is responsible for the accident because he was driving while impaired.

Explanation: A blood alcohol level of .125 is above the legal limit and the driver was violating a criminal statute and would be responsible for the death of the pedestrian.

Answer:

The correct answer is 2. Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unions.

Explanation:

The freedom of association is a fundamental right for groups of people, which has been formulated in various places. This fundamental right is sometimes used in conjunction with the freedom of assembly.

With the emergence of the new, large and important class in the form of industrial workers, there was a greater awareness of the essence of freedom, which was reflected in freedom of speech, freedom of the press and thus freedom of association. At that time it was about the principle that workers and other citizens can unite in a group (trade unions, political parties) that promote the interests of this group of people. Freedom of association is a logical feature of a liberal vision because it represents the ultimate means of exerting (political) pressure on government and society. Without this right one would not have been able to participate in the governance of a country or company. That is why this right became essential for the formation of a democratic, liberal state.

Prosecutors use a grand jury to formally charge suspects in about half of states.

In the United States, the use of grand juries in criminal proceedings varies from state to state. While grand juries are commonly employed in the federal criminal justice system, their usage at the state level differs. Approximately half of the states in the U.S. require the use of grand juries for certain felony cases, while the other half either do not use grand juries at all or use them in a more limited capacity.

In states where grand juries are utilized, they serve as an investigative body that reviews evidence presented by prosecutors to determine if there is enough probable cause to bring formal charges against a suspect. The grand jury consists of a panel of citizens who are selected from the community and are responsible for evaluating the evidence and deciding whether there is enough merit to proceed with a criminal trial. This process offers an additional layer of scrutiny before formal charges are filed and helps ensure that there is a sufficient basis for prosecution.

However, it's important to note that the decision to use grand juries can vary within individual states as well. Some states may require their use for all felony cases, while others may only require them for certain serious offenses or high-profile cases. Additionally, a few states have entirely abolished the use of grand juries and rely solely on preliminary hearings or other mechanisms to determine whether charges should be filed.

In summary, prosecutors use a grand jury to formally charge suspects in approximately half of states in the United States. The specific requirements and usage of grand juries can differ from state to state, with some states mandating their use for certain felony cases and others using them in a more limited capacity or not at all.

Learn more about Prosecutors here

https://brainly.com/question/28893404

#SPJ11

Answer:

Answer, THE SENATE

Explanation:

under the Appointments Clause of the United States constitution and law of the United States, certain federal positions appointed by the presidents of the United States require confirmation (advice and consent) of the United States SENATE.

Hope this helped my friend?!

The statement that 'If a defendant intended to act, but did not intend the consequence, then general intent is present' is true as general intent is associated with the act and not consequence.

General intent refers to the intent to commit the act itself, rather than a specific outcome or consequence of that act. Therefore, even if the defendant did not intend for a particular consequence to occur, their intent to commit the act is still present and qualifies as general intent because their actions were deliberate, even if the resulting outcome was unintended.

However, it is important to note that specific intent may be required for certain crimes, and in those cases, the defendant's lack of intent for a specific consequence may be relevant. Hence, the statement that if a defendant intended to act but did not intend the consequence, general intent is present is correct.

Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: If a defendant intended to act, but did not intend the consequence, then general intent is present. True or false.

Learn more about General intent:

https://brainly.com/question/30328524

#SPJ11

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (or SOX Act) is the U.S Federal law was enacted as a result of the Enron and mci/WorldCom accounting scandals that helps protect investors by making corporate disclosures, accounting and auditing more reliable and accurate.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was signed into law by President Bush on July 30, 2002, in response to the 2001 accounting scandals at Enron and WorldCom.

SOX, named after its sponsors, Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley, has four titles that regulate the financial disclosures of public companies and the accounting practices of publicly traded companies and their auditors, in addition to creating specific penalties for committing accounting fraud against shareholders.

The legislation strengthened criminal penalties for fraudulent financial reporting and provided for shareholder lawsuits against executives who commit fraud or violate federal securities laws.

The purpose of the act: The U.S. Federal law that became known as Sarbanes-Oxley resulted from the Enron and WorldCom accounting scandals that occurred in 2000 and 2002 respectively.

The act is made up of eleven sections of law and created new securities legislation with a focus on accuracy, reliability, and transparency within corporations' financial reports.

It also places more responsibility on corporations' auditors to make sure they are meeting their obligations.

With respect to securities fraud, this section provides for a prison sentence of up to 10 years for willfully destroying records, altering documents, and making false statements in any matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States or in any case filed under section 78y.

In connection with that prohibition, Section 302 also prohibits those individuals who are not directors but do manage a company's books and records from falsely certifying those documents.

SEC. 802. ENFORCEMENT OF CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTS.

(a) Section 13(b)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m

(b)(2)) is amended by striking or willfully or recklessly fails to make a reasonable effort to determine whether the issuer is in compliance with any provision of this chapter and inserting fails to comply with any provision of this chapter.

To learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act refer to: https://brainly.com/question/27915345

#SPJ4  

Newton's Laws of Motion help us comprehend how things behave whether they are stationary, moving, and subjected to forces. There are three different laws of motion.

According to Newton's First Law of Motion, an object/ body in motion tends to continue in motion until an external force acts on it. Similarly, if the item is at rest, it will stay at rest unless acted upon by an imbalanced force. The Law of Inertia is another name for Newton's First Law of Motion.

According to Newton's Second Law of Motion, an item will accelerate if a force is applied to it. The force required to accelerate an item depends on its mass, which increases as mass increases. The formula for this Law is force = mass x acceleration.

Another approach to express the Second Law is to explain that moving a heavy item requires more force than moving a light one. The legislation also discusses slowing down or deceleration. Deceleration can be compared to acceleration with a minus sign.

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, according to Newton's Third Law of Motion. This implies that when you press on anything, it will push back at you in the exact same amount but in the opposite direction. For instance, when you stand on the ground, the Earth pushes back up at you with the same amount of force as you are exerting downward.

We can learn more about Newton's laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/15280051#

#SPJ4

Answer:

I think you should go with A

Explanation:

For the simple fact that you are the one saying it and not someone else and it comes from your state of mind and not someone else's

The agreement may occasionally be subject to the approval of a third party. A contract that commits two or more parties to carrying out or refraining from performing an action now or in the future.

A third party is not considered a party to the agreement just because they have the legal ability to enforce it. The third party merely has the same legal rights to sue regarding the contract as if they were a party to it, including the right to seek damages or an injunction.

This illustrative clause completely precludes the application of the Contracts (Third Party Rights) Act. It takes an artistic skill to construct provisions like this that offer rights to third parties rather than exclude them. It depends on the rights that are to be awarded, who is to receive them, and the restrictions placed on those rights.

The risk that the parties to a contract take on increases when third parties are given rights under the agreement.

To know more about Contract visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22440306

#SPJ4

Answer:

A, neglect

Explanation:

All the other ones were talking about giving up something(abandonment),being responsible( good Samaritan), Having an approval to do something specific(Consent) But, from all of those Neglect was the one not being responsible in fear and being an able to take actions.

C corporations and S corporations are different in taxation, ownership restriction, and shareholder rights. While similarities are limited liabilities and corporate formalities.

Differences:

Similarities:

Learn more about corporations, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30312786

#SPJ4

Answer:

To "protect the confidentiality of high level presidential communications and the principle of separation of powers protects the president through the independence of the executive branch.

Explanation:

Answer:

before the government may deprive someone of “life, liberty, or property.” In other words, the Clause does not prohibit the government from depriving someone of “substantive” rights such as life, liberty, or property; it simply requires that the government follow ...

False. Canada has a dual legal system that includes both the Common Law tradition and the Civil Law tradition.

The Common Law tradition is primarily used in most provinces and territories in Canada, including English-speaking provinces such as Ontario, British Columbia, and Alberta. Common Law is based on case law and legal precedent developed through judicial decisions.

However, the province of Quebec follows the Civil Law tradition, which is derived from French civil law principles. The Civil Law system is based on a comprehensive legal code that outlines rights, obligations, and rules governing various aspects of civil life. Quebec's Civil Code, known as the Civil Code of Quebec, is the primary legislation that governs civil matters in the province.

Therefore, it is incorrect to say that the Civil Law tradition is not used in any place in Canada. Quebec, with its distinct legal system, applies the Civil Law tradition alongside the Common Law tradition found in the rest of Canada.

Learn more about Civil Law here:

https://brainly.com/question/493036

#SPJ11

Answer:

U bot

Explanation:

u suck at fortnite if u dont friend me and lets one v one

Benol9

Being charged with identity theft in a court of law - results in a maximum fine of $300,000

The unauthorized seizure of another person's property with the purpose to permanently rob them of it is considered theft in law. This might include real assets like cash or personal property as well as intangible assets like trade secrets or private data. Depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the incident, theft is a serious felony that may be punished with fines or imprisonment.

The maximum sentence for identity theft in federal court is 15 years in federal prison, but identity theft cases sometimes also involve other counts that might lengthen the prison term.

For such more question on theft:

brainly.com/question/30293258

#SPJ4

A legal argument based on the notion that a defendant should not be held responsible for an illegal act if it is attributable to mental illness or intellectual disability that interferes with rationality is called an insanity defense.

What is an insanity defense?An insanity defense is a legal defense that argues that the accused was not guilty of the crime owing to insanity at the time of the crime. The defense acknowledges that the accused perpetrated the act, but claims that due to a mental illness, they were unable to understand the wrongfulness of their conduct.In court cases, how is the insanity defense used?

The insanity defense may be employed in court cases where a defendant is charged with a crime, but the defense argues that the defendant was mentally ill or intellectually disabled at the time of the offense, and thus incapable of knowing that what they were doing was wrong.The insanity defense necessitates the use of psychiatric testimony to support the assertion that the defendant was mentally ill or intellectually disabled at the time of the offense.

Only in specific, severe cases are people allowed to make an insanity defense claim, such as those involving mental disorders or intellectual disabilities that impair or limit cognitive functioning.The most well-known application of the insanity defense in criminal law is in homicide cases, and it's often employed when the defendant has been found to have committed murder but is discovered to have been mentally ill or intellectually disabled at the time of the offense.

To know more about insanity defense refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28249990

#SPJ11

Many large international NGOs, such as Amnesty International, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies are transnational federations of national groups.

An organization that is typically founded independently of the government is known as a non-governmental organisation (NGO) or non-governmental organization. They can also include clubs and groups that offer services to its members and other people.

Typically, they are nonprofit organizations, and many of them are involved in humanitarianism or the social sciences. According to surveys, NGOs enjoy a high level of public trust, making them an effective stand-in for societal and stakeholder issues. However, certain NGOs, like the World Economic Forum, can act as corporate lobbying organisations.

To know more about NGO here-

https://brainly.com/question/29790825

#SPJ4

These policies aim to restore stability and promote economic growth. They can be broadly categorized into two main types: macroeconomic policies and structural policies.

Macroeconomic policies include fiscal and monetary measures. Fiscal policies involve controlling government spending and increasing revenue through taxation or borrowing. This helps reduce budget deficits and ensures debt sustainability. Monetary policies focus on managing money supply, interest rates, and exchange rates. Central banks can adjust interest rates to control inflation and stabilize exchange rates to boost export competitiveness.

Structural policies address long-term economic challenges. They aim to enhance productivity, competitiveness, and diversify the economy. These policies often involve structural reforms, such as improving the business environment, reducing trade barriers, and promoting private sector development. They may also involve investments in education, infrastructure, and technology to foster economic transformation and attract foreign direct investment.

Overall, the IMF advises developing countries to adopt a comprehensive approach that combines macroeconomic stabilization measures with structural reforms. This helps address immediate balance of payments issues while laying the foundation for sustainable and inclusive growth in the long run.

To learn more about economic growth click here, brainly.com/question/29621837

#SPJ11

Under the 1 -1 identification procedure, the suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm the witness identity.

The 1 -1 identification procedure  is a procedure used by the police to test the ability of witnesses to identify a person they have seen on a previous occasion.

Therefore, the Option A. is correct.

Read more about 1 -1 identification procedure:

brainly.com/question/17939627

It was done by Barton F. Graf 9000, New York advertising agency

Using the democracy standard, federalism can constrain democracy in five ways as democratic power , influence the policy-making process, restricts the powers of elected officials , unequal distribution , national decisions .

1. Federalism creates distinct levels of government that limit the scope of the citizens’ democratic power.
2. Federalism divides the government’s powers, making it difficult for citizens to influence the policy-making process.
3. Federalism restricts the powers of elected officials, resulting in a limited amount of citizens’ input.
4. Federalism can cause unequal distribution of resources and influence among the states, resulting in less power for citizens in some states.
5. Federalism can prevent citizens from having the same voice in national decisions that they do in state and local decisions.

For more similar questions on federalism:

brainly.com/question/12835949

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

no explanation

Answer:

The answer is d

Explanation: