Answers
The Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) supported the women's suffrage movement as in 1880s in part because they thought that most women would vote to outlaw alcoholic beverages completely.
The WCTU's perspective on women's suffrageThe WCTU helped legitimize the movement by putting less emphasis on the more radical notion of gender equality and more emphasis on ensuring women's participation in politics as the guardians of the home.
The WCTU wanted to outlaw alcohol, but why?The WCTU advocated for the legislative banning among all alcoholic beverages because they believed that alcohol addiction was the root of immorality, sickness, sex work, poverty, aggression towards women & children, and unemployment.
To learn more about WCTU visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9798463
#SPJ4
Related Questions
What is the use of force continuum? Legally does it help or hurt an officer when he has to justify his actions in court.
Answers
The use of force continuum guides officers but can be both helpful and detrimental when justifying their actions in court.
utilizing force Law enforcement personnel are guided by the continuum framework when determining how much force is necessary in various circumstances. If an officer is defending their actions in court, it might help or hurt them. On the one hand it offers a consistent framework to show that the officer adhered to protocol and applied appropriate force. This can help them prove that they were following the law.
But it is also possible to examine the continuum, especially if excessive force is alleged. The officer may have violated the continuum or overused force, according to critics. The effectiveness of the continuum in court ultimately depends on the particular facts, the evidence at hand and the officer's capacity to defend their actions within its bounds.
Learn more about force continuum at:
brainly.com/question/30636540
#SPJ4
What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses?
Answers
Answer:
Answer Expert Verified The statement that best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses is “Under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.”
What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. ... He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.
WAS THIS ANSWER HELPFUL?
MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST
They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.
What is the meaning of the Constitution?A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organization, or another sort of body's legal system and frequently specify how that institution is to be governed.
A state's constitution serves as its rulebook. It lays out the guiding ideals that the state is governed by. It provides an overview of the state's primary institutions and outlines their interrelationships (for example, between the executive, legislature, and judiciary).
The members of the provincial assemblies chosen by the Indian populace formed the Constituent Assembly of India, which drafted the Constitution. The first president of the Constituent Assembly was Dr. Sachidanand Sinha. Eventually, it elected Dr. Rajendra Prasad as president.
Learn more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ2
The ___ has one supreme power over and above all other power in the state A) common law.
B) Civil law.
C) Constitution.
D) legislation
Answers
Question 6
42
Which of the following could not be shipped by mail to a crime lab?
Hair samples
Tire impression mold
Explosive materials
Blood samples
Answers
There are endless consequences of being an "inmate," "prisoner," "convict," etc. Pick what you consider to be the 3 biggest problems for these individuals when they leave incarceration and return to their communities.
Answers
2. Finishing College/School
3. Finding a Partner
substantive law: sets the rules by wehich one may enforce his rights under the law. None of these choices. defines, regulates, and creates a legal relationship or prohibits certain conduct. is the same thing as procedural law.
Answers
Substantive law is a type of law that defines, regulates, and creates legal relationships, as well as prohibits certain conduct.
It sets the rules by which one may enforce their rights under the law. This is different from procedural law, which focuses on the processes and procedures involved in the legal system.
Substantive law helps to establish and maintain a just and orderly society by clearly outlining the rights and responsibilities of individuals and organizations.
In summary, substantive law is essential for defining and regulating legal relationships and conduct, while procedural law ensures that the legal system operates effectively and fairly.
To know more about Substantive law refer here: https://brainly.com/question/30673552#
#SPJ11
1 - Multiple choice
Which one of the following is not a natural
resource?
P
(a) the Red Fox in Bale Mountains National
Park
(b) the elephants in Mago Park
(c) the Walia Ibex in Semien Mountain
National Park
d) the monuments of Axum
Responsibility means:
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
is an agreement to work for a person for the lifetime of that person subject to the statute of frauds? why/why not?
Answers
Yes, an agreement to work for a person for the lifetime of that person subject to the statute of frauds as If it is possible that a contract with an uncertain completion date will be finished within a year, it is not subject to the Statute of Frauds.
A legal principle known as the statute of frauds mandates that certain kinds of contracts must be executed in writing in order to be legally binding. State laws include statutes of frauds. The statutes of fraud vary from state to state, but they are all constrained. Only some types of oral contracts are covered by statutes of fraud.
Ordinarily, an enforceable contract can be either written or oral, but in some cases, statutes of frauds specify two key conditions that must be met for certain oral contracts in order for them to be upheld. A contract that is subject to a statute of frauds will not be enforceable unless it is documented in writing. It's not necessary for the writing to be an official contract.
Learn more about Statute of Frauds at:
brainly.com/question/29607080
#SPJ4
Which of the following best describes Napoleon Bonaparte’s place in the history of EMS? (Check all that apply.)
Answers
Answer:
I can't answer this because there are no options...
Explanation:
Please upload options & I will try and answer your question.
He asked physician, Jean He asked physician, Jean Dominique Larrey, to conceive a system for treating soldiers
Explanation:Jean Dominique Larrey created the triage system in which he treated people in order of the severity of their injury not based on rank or anything of the sort
Complete the following sentence.
The diverse roles of eligibility interviewers require these professionals to be knowledgeable, compassionate,
and___.
Answers
Answer:
Knowledgeable, compassionate, and responsible
Explanation:
Answer: diligent
Explanation:
i went through the notes
Many people in an area have lost their jobs and are about to lose their homes because they cannot make their monthly mortgage payments Jane , a lawyer , writes to all of these people saying she is willing to represent them to prevent the loss of their homes . Should she allowed to do this ?
PLEASE HELP!!!
Answers
Answer:
It's up to her.
Explanation:
I'm no lawyer but I think that they get to pick and choose if they want to accept any cases or not. I think that if she wants to take the risk to represent them, then she should be allowed to.
In order to get your original driver license of any type: You will be tested on what four (4) categories.
A) Vision test
B) knowledge of motor vehicles law
C) Traffic Signs
D) Driving Skills
E) All of the above
Answers
Answer:
E...
Explanation:
To get your original driver license, you will be tested on vision, motor vehicle law, traffic signs, and driving skills. The correct option is e.
You will be put through four tests in order to get your first driver's license such as vision, legal knowledge of motor vehicles, traffic signs and driving prowess. The vision test determines whether you have the required visual acuity levels for safe driving. Your knowledge of the driving laws and regulations is assessed by the knowledge test.
In order to pass the traffic signs test, you must show that you can recognize a variety of traffic signs and their meanings. Your capacity to drive safely and effectively is evaluated by the driving skills test. If you pass all of these exams, you can be sure that you're ready to get your driver's license and can drive safely.
learn more about driver license here
brainly.com/question/29441847
#SPJ2
A state legislature passes a statute prohibiting businesses from supporting any political candidate. If some business owners challenge the constitutionality of the law in court, will the law be upheld?.
Answers
According to the given statement No, because the law is an unconstitutional restriction on free speech.
Why is it called as unconstitutional?Constitutionality is defined as the state of being in compliance with the laws or provisions of the applicable constitution; it is also the condition of acting in such compliance. A law, method, or action is unconstitutional if it directly contravenes the constitution.
Who gets to decide whether a law is unconstitutional?The judicial branch interprets laws and determines whether a statute is unlawful. The judicial branch includes lower federal courts including the U.S. Supreme Court. There really are nine justices on the Supreme Court.
To know more about Unconstitutional visit:
https://brainly.com/question/354100
#SPJ4
suppose you were trying to reform your city's government so that it better reflected the ethnic and racial diversity of your city and with leadership that is more accountable to voters. which of the following forms of city government would most likely achieve these goals?
Answers
A council-manager shape of presidency with a mixture of single-member districts and at-massive elections could maximum possibly reap those goals.
The required details about council-manager is mentioned in below paragraph.
The council-manager authorities is a shape of nearby authorities used for municipalities, counties, or different equal regions. It is one of the maximum not unusualplace kinds of nearby authorities withinside the United States in conjunction with the mayor–council authorities shape, and is not unusualplace in Ireland.The council-manager authorities is a shape of nearby authorities used for municipalities, counties, or different equal regions. It is one of the maximum not unusualplace kinds of nearby authorities withinside the United States in conjunction with the mayor–council authorities shape, and is not unusualplace in Ireland. The council–supervisor shape is likewise used in New Zealand for local councils, and in Canada and plenty of different nations for city and county councils.
(COMPLETE QUESTIONS)
Suppose you were trying to reform your city's government so that it better reflected the ethnic and racial diversity of your city and with leadership that is more accountable to voters. Which of the following forms of city government would most likely achieve these goals? a mayor-council form of government with single-member districts a commissioner form of government operating under a general-law framework a commissioner form of government with atlarge elections a council-manager form of government with a mix of single-member districts and at-large elections
To learn about council-manager visit here.
https://brainly.com/question/29395845
#SPJ1
(Case Study Question) Because Henry has a history of heart disease, he is concerned that his poor health may leave him incapacitated in the future. He would like to give his oldest child the right to make medical decisions if he is so ill he is unable to make them himself. Which of the following documents would accomplish this?
A) Living will
B) Power of appointment
C) Living trust
D) Durable power of attorney for health care (DPOAHC)
Answers
The document that would accomplish Henry's goal of granting his oldest child the right to make medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated is option D) Durable power of attorney for health care (DPOAHC).
A Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care is a legal document that allows an individual (the principal) to designate someone (the agent or attorney-in-fact) to make healthcare decisions on their behalf if they become unable to do so themselves. This document ensures that Henry's wishes regarding his medical treatment and care are respected and followed, even if he is unable to communicate or make decisions.
Unlike a living will, which only specifies a person's preferences for end-of-life care, a DPOAHC grants broader decision-making authority to the designated agent. It allows the agent to make medical decisions in a variety of situations, not just limited to end-of-life care.
By selecting the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care, Henry can ensure that his oldest child has the legal authority to act as his healthcare advocate and make important medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated due to his poor health.
Learn more about attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/31861735
#SPJ4
Thinking about a felony (serious
crime, more than a year in prison) versus a misdemeanor crime (less serious crime,
less than a year in jail), how should the following scenario be classified and why.
Steve and Dan were riding and listening to LOUD music on the radio. Steve was the
driver and Dan was the passenger. Both men had at least one drink for dinner
FOUR hours earlier, Dan had three. An unidentified man ran the light causing Steve
to slam into his car totaling it. The unidentified man had severe bodily injuries and
was taken to the hospital. The police officer arrived to investigate the accident
and smelled alcohol on Dans breath and arrested BOTH men (Steve and Dan) and
charged them with a felony DUI (driving under the influence).
In YOUR opinion, was it fair to arrest BOTH men for DUI? Why or why not?
Should Steve be charged? Why or why not? Should the other driver be charged?
Why or why not? Could or should either be charged with a misdemeanor? Why or
why not?
Answers
Answer:
Based on the scenario provided, it is fair to arrest Steve only for DUI. The police officer smelled alcohol on Steve's breath, indicating that he was driving under the influence of alcohol. Steve was driving the car and was responsible for the safety of the passengers and other drivers on the road. Therefore, he should be charged with DUI.
The other driver who ran the red light cannot be charged with DUI as there is no evidence to suggest that he was driving under the influence of alcohol or any other substance. However, he could potentially face charges for causing the accident.
Whether the charge should be a felony or misdemeanor depends on the specific laws in the state where the accident occurred and the severity of the injuries sustained by the other driver. However, a felony charge is appropriate since the other driver sustained severe bodily injuries .
Overall, individuals must understand the potential consequences of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. They should make responsible decisions to ensure their safety and the safety of others on the road.
Explanation:
Answer:
Based on the scenario provided, it is fair to arrest Steve only for DUI. The police officer smelled alcohol on Steve's breath, indicating that he was driving under the influence of alcohol. Steve was driving the car and was responsible for the safety of the passengers and other drivers on the road. Therefore, he should be charged with DUI.
The other driver who ran the red light cannot be charged with DUI as there is no evidence to suggest that he was driving under the influence of alcohol or any other substance. However, he could potentially face charges for causing the accident.
Whether the charge should be a felony or misdemeanor depends on the specific laws in the state where the accident occurred and the severity of the injuries sustained by the other driver. However, a felony charge is appropriate since the other driver sustained severe bodily injuries .
Overall, individuals must understand the potential consequences of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. They should make responsible decisions to ensure their safety and the safety of others on the road.
Explanation:
Water Power Corporation wants to begin operations that include the discharge of waste into navigable waters. Under the Clean Water Act, the company must install certain equipment a. with all deliberate speed after beginning operations. b. before beginning operations. c. only on a voluntary basis. d. only if a regulatory agency challenges the discharge.
Answers
The best choice is B. The business must install specific equipment before starting operations in accordance with the Clean Water Act.
How is water power generated?So at plant level, water circulates via a pipe, also called a penstock, which rotates a turbine's blades, which spins a generator, which generates energy. Most traditional hydroelectric facilities, notably hydroelectricity and run-of-the-river systems, function in this way.
What benefit does water power have?In addition to producing energy, hydropower also provides flood control, agriculture help, and drinking water purification. Hydropower has a low cost. Hydropower is a long-lasting energy source that provides affordable electricity versus other forms of energy.
To know more about Water Power Corporation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29816303
#SPJ4
The plaintiff, a State N citizen, properly invokes a State M federal court's diversity jurisdiction in a tort suit against the defendant, an airplane manufacturer based in State M. The plaintiff credibly alleges that he was severely injured when the defendant's airplane crashed as a result of an improperly installed engine part. During discovery, the plaintiff learns that an employee of the defendant who installed engine parts at the time the plane was manufactured was an alcoholic whose drinking may have impaired his work. The defendant fired the employee before the plane crash that injured the plaintiff. What discovery device may the plaintiff use to obtain more information from the former employee?
A
An oral deposition.
B
An interrogatory.
C
A physical examination.
D
A request for admission.
Answers
The discovery device that the plaintiff may use to obtain more information from the former employee is an "oral deposition."
An oral deposition is a discovery method in which one party (in this case, the plaintiff) questions the other party or a witness (in this case, the defendant's former employee) under oath, while a court reporter records the questions and replies. The plaintiff might utilise the oral deposition to interrogate the former employee about his alcohol consumption and whether it interfered with his work when he installed engine parts for the defendant. The plaintiff may also ask the former employee further questions about the situation.
Interrogatories are written questions sent from one side to the other, but a physical examination involves a physical examination of a person.
For such more question on plaintiff:
https://brainly.com/question/1463591
#SPJ4
A mother was in a nursing home and asked her attorney to draft a deed that would give her farm to her son. The attorney drew up the deed, had the mother properly execute it, and thereafter properly recorded the deed. The attorney then told the son what she had done. The son immediately went to the nursing home and told the mother that he did not want the farm so she should take back the deed. A week later, the mother returned home to the farm. Shortly thereafter, the son died without a will, leaving his wife as his only heir. The mother has brought an action against the wife to quiet her title to the farm. If the mother is successful in this action, what is the likely reason
Answers
The likely reason is that: the son never effectively accepted delivery of the deed before he died.
What is deed?In law a deed can be defined as a document that entails the agreed terms and conditions of a land ownership between two people or two or more people or parties.
Based on the given scenario if the mother brought an action against her son wife after the dead of her son based on who the title of the farm belongs to, the mother might likely win the case because her son never accepted the deed of the land ownership.
Therefore the likely reason is that: the son never effectively accepted delivery of the deed before he died.
Learn more about deed here:https://brainly.com/question/4729037
#SPJ12
The permanent employment laws in many countries have resulted in differences between the Untied States and countries like France and Germany. Which of the following is an example of these differences?
a. The possibility of firing someone quickly without cause is a simple matter in Germany
b. It is a simple matter to fire an employee in France after a relatively short probationary period
c. German workers get an average of four time more severance pay than U.S. workers
d. In France, 45 hours is the legal weekly work limit for all employees
Answers
The differences between the United States and countries like France and Germany regarding permanent employment laws are: German workers get an average of four times more severance pay than U.S. workers.
Hence, option C is the correct answer. Labor laws across the world vary significantly, and it's fascinating to look at different countries' labor laws.
Europe is known for its more extensive labor protections, such as maximum workweeks and more significant vacation time. One of the most important areas of difference between US law and that of many European nations is labor law. In the US, it is relatively easy to hire and fire employees, while in Europe, there is a lot more job security in exchange for more challenging hiring procedures.
Permanent employment means that you are hired to work for a business, organization, or agency and will continue to work there as long as you like, provided that you follow the rules and do your job well. The only way your employment could come to an end is if you decide to quit or if the company has a valid reason to terminate you.
To know more about permanent employment laws refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14128742#
#SPJ11
a texas ranger shrub that has been regularly and frequently pruned with heading cuts is considerably _____
Answers
A Texas Ranger shrub that has been regularly and frequently pruned with heading cuts is considerably well-maintained and compact. This consistent pruning method encourages healthy growth and a dense branching structure, contributing to an attractive and thriving plant.
A Texas Ranger shrub that has been regularly and frequently pruned with heading cuts is considerably smaller and more compact. This pruning technique encourages bushier growth and limits the shrub's overall size. However, it's important to note that over-pruning can harm the plant's health, so it's essential to use proper pruning techniques and not prune more than a third of the shrub at one time. Overall, regular and frequent heading cuts can help maintain a tidy and attractive Texas Ranger shrub in a manageable size.
To know more about Texas Ranger visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30820467
#SPJ11
Please help me!!!
suppose you are having a difficult time deciding whether to become a probation or a parole officer. draw up a pro and con list for each job and then write a summary of why you choose one. you must make a decision for one job-even if it just for this exercise. write your response in approximately 250
words.
Answers
Answer:
I have decided to become a probation officer
Explanation:
Pros of becoming a probation officer:
Work with individuals who are attempting to turn their lives around
Opportunities for career advancement
Ability to make a positive impact in the community
Cons of becoming a probation officer:
Can be stressful and emotionally draining
May be required to work odd hours or on call
Risk of personal danger when dealing with high-risk individuals
Pros of becoming a parole officer:
May have a more flexible schedule
Opportunities for career advancement
Ability to make a positive impact in the community
Cons of becoming a parole officer:
Can be stressful and emotionally draining
Risk of personal danger when dealing with high-risk individuals
May be required to work odd hours or on call
After weighing the pros and cons, I have decided to become a probation officer. While both positions have their challenges, I feel that the opportunity to work with individuals who are attempting to turn their lives around and make a positive impact in the community is a rewarding one. Additionally, I am drawn to the potential for career advancement and the chance to work with a team.
When a counselor communicates with a client using e-mail:_____
a. the counselor should never include anything that is confidential because it is unethical to do so.
b. the client's business e-mail address should never be used because employers often read the e-mail messages of their employees.
c. the client should be told to avoid using e-mail to set or change appointment times because it is impossible to tell whether the counselor received the message that was sent.
d. the client should be advised that e-mail messages can always be retrieved and that e-mail systems are not as secure as other means of communication.
e. the counselor should never print out the e-mail messages because the client s confidentiality would be compromised by the existence of paper copies.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is E
Explanation:
Whenever you're talking to a client there is always confidentiality, unless you or someone else is in danger they are not allowed to say anything PERIOD. whether it's over phone, email, text, or talking in person they are never allowed to share. <3 hope this helps
Which amendment separated the vote for president and vice president in the electoral college?.
Answers
The twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution separated the vote for president and vice president in the electoral college.
What is the twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution?The process for choosing the president and vice president is outlined in the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution (often known as Amendment XII). It replaced the method by which the Electoral College was initially operated, as specified in Article II, Section 1, Clause 3. On December 9, 1803, Congress introduced the amendment, and on June 15, 1804, the required three-fourths of state legislatures ratified it. All subsequent presidential elections have been conducted in accordance with the revised regulations, which became effective for the 1804 election.
There was no distinction between votes cast for president and vice president under the original terms of the Constitution, which required each member of the Electoral College to cast two votes.
To know more about the twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution visit:- https://brainly.com/question/730274
#SPJ4
The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through which of the following means?
A. Stating incorrect facts and observing the subject's reaction.
B. Asking a series of indirect questions.
C. Making the subject feel relaxed and comfortable.
D. Creating a situation in which the subject perceives that they may be in danger.
Answers
Answer:
B. Asking a series of indirect questions.
Explanation:
The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through asking a series of indirect questions.
Option A refers to a technique called deception, where incorrect facts are stated to observe the subject's reaction. Option C refers to building rapport, which can help to establish trust and encourage the subject to share information voluntarily. Option D refers to the use of intimidation or coercion, which is not a recommended or ethical method for obtaining information.
what type of crime is selling alcohol after hours (after 2:00 am)?
Answers
Selling alcohol after hours (after 2:00 am) is typically considered a violation of liquor licensing laws.
What category of violation does selling alcohol after hours fall into?Selling alcohol after hours, commonly after 2:00 am, is generally regarded as a violation of liquor licensing laws. These laws govern the sale, distribution, and consumption of alcohol within a specific jurisdiction and typically include regulations on operating hours for establishments that serve alcohol. Selling alcohol outside of the permitted hours is often seen as a breach of these regulations and may result in penalties or consequences for the establishment or individual involved. The specific penalties and enforcement mechanisms can vary depending on local laws and regulations.
Learn more about Selling alcohol
brainly.com/question/30846841
#SPJ11
the minimum wage law is an example of responses the unwritten constitution. the unwritten constitution. a right guaranteed by the constitution. a right guaranteed by the constitution. an interpretation of the constitution. an interpretation of the constitution. the amendment process.
Answers
The minimum wage type of law is an example for an interpretation of the all Constitution.
Minimum Price are an example of minimum wage rules. The minimum wage becomes a legally obligatory price floor if it is set higher than the market clearing wage. The Minimum Wages Act of 1948 is a piece of federal legislation that aims to impose legal minimum wage rates in jobs where sweated labor is common and there is a chance that disorganized workers may be exploited.
According to federal law, a minimum wage is the lowest salary an employee may be paid per hour. Nonexempt workers may not be offered a job or agree to work for less than the legally required minimum wage level for hourly compensation.
Learn more about minimum wage law visit: brainly.com/question/14337883
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
The minimum wage law is an example _____________ of the all Constitution.
1. The unwritten constitution. a right guaranteed by the constitution.
2. A right guaranteed by the constitution.
3. An interpretation of the constitution.
4. An interpretation of the constitution. the amendment process.
Drew and Bella bought a large lot with two homes on it, one for them and one for Bella's aging mother, Lynette. They hire an interior designer to redecorate the homes. In the contract, they refer to the second home as "Lynette's home" and state that the interior design of the home is exclusively Lynette's decision. Lynette does not sign the contract, but does send lovely thank-you notes two weeks later to the interior designer and to Drew and Bella. Lynette:
Answers
Answer:
Lynette is a third party beneficiary.
Explanation:
A third party beneficiary is a person who has benefited through a contract established by two other parties, that is, in the case of the question above, the contract was made between the couple Drew and Bella (one party) with an interior designer (another part) to promote the decoration of the houses, but the contract included Lynette's house, which was not part of the contract, but was included as an intended third party beneficiary. In addition, when she sent the thank you notes, she promoted the guarantee of her rights as the intended third party beneficiary.
Should employed be allowed to monitor their employee's personal communications during non-working hours?
Answers
what is “ judical restraint” and which supreme court justices practiced it?
Answers
Judicial restraint is the refusal to exercise judicial review in deference to the process of ordinary politics.
Here are some Supreme Court justices who practiced it:
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (served 1902–1932)Louis Brandeis (served 1916–1939)Felix Frankfurter (served 1939–1962)