Why do citizens have a duty to serve on juries when called?
Answers
Answer:
Jury service helps to support fairness in trials; jury service is able to give impartial viewpoints on cases that are presented in court. Jury service is a civic duty and an honored privilege bestowed upon ordinary citizens. We are accountable through our participation in jury service.
Explanation:
Related Questions
Which of the following most accurately defines the neighbour principle
a) The class of people whom are owed a duty of care
b) The standard of care that must be followed when completing a task
c) The duty to look after your neighbours
d) The protection of the public
Answers
The most accurate definition of the neighbour principle is c) The duty to look after your neighbours.
What is the neighbor principle ?The neighbour principle is a legal concept that arises in the context of tort law, which deals with civil wrongs and injuries caused by one party to another.
In practical terms, the neighbour principle means that individuals and businesses have a duty to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others, including both physical and economic harm.
Find out more on the neighbor principle at https://brainly.com/question/29845245
#SPJ1
NEED HELP ASAP
Ralphie, a young delinquent liing in new York city, has been picked up by police after being cought swiping fruit from a produce stand. Where will Ralphie MOST LIKELY be placed
Answers
Answer: reformatory
Explanation:
hope this helps!!
Answer:a reformatory
Explanation:beacause back then he would have been put there
What is a legal custom
Answers
Answer: A legal custom is the established pattern of behavior that can be objectively verified within a particular social setting. A claim can be carried out in defense of "what has always been done and accepted by law".
will give brainliest 3
Answers
Answer:
ok?
Explanation:
you are making a left turn and there are two turning lanes
a. you must choose one lane and not change lanes as you turn
b. signal left and change lanes if you must
c. always take the near turn lane
d. none of these are correct
e. all of these are correct
Answers
You are making a left turn and there are two turning lanes you must choose one lane and not change lanes as you turn. Thus, option A is correct.
A huge truck might have to turn right before turning left. If there are two left turn lanes at a junction, the vehicle should start its turn in the right lane.
If there is a stop line (or limit line), use your turn signal and come to a complete stop before going through the junction. You may turn right at the red light if there isn't a sign that says you can't.
Make sure you don't obstruct traffic that has a green signal from moving automobiles, bicycles, or pedestrians. When making a left turn, a motorist must move into the farthest left lane that is legally open to traffic traveling in the same direction as the turning vehicle.
Learn more about traffic rules here:
https://brainly.com/question/31602124
#SPJ4
2. Someone else can drive your car if
Answers
Answer:
if they have proof fo insurance
Explanation:
i took the quiz
What are the goals of the world trade organization 
Answers
Select the correct answer. What is a treaty? A. an informal agreement between two or more nations B. a formal agreement between two heads of state C. an informal agreement between two heads of state D. a formal agreement between two or more nations
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
For which type of vehicle is insurance not required?
Answers
Answer:
a motorcycle or a dirtbike
Explanation:
You are eligible to get your Class E restricted license when you
are at least 16 years old and have had your Learner License for
at least. ___months.
9
2
6
12
Answers
Answer:
6 months
hey!
To apply for a provisional driver's license, a driver must be at least 16 and under 18 years old. The person must have held a learner's permit for at least six months prior to applying for a provisional driver's license.
The driver also must have at least 100 hours of driving experience supervised by a person at least 21 years of age who has had a valid driver's license for at least three years. Alternatively, the driver can complete a traffic safety education course and at least 50 hours of supervised driving experience.
hope that helps! :)
Answer:
The correct answer is 6 months.
Explanation:
MARK ME AS BRIANLIST
Linda lived next to an 86-year-old woman named Margaret. Margaret was home-bound, she couldn't
drive any more, and lived on a low fixed income. She had no children or relatives in the area. For the
past two years, Linda would help Margaret by buying groceries, taking her to doctor appointments,
cleaning up around the house, and picking up her prescriptions. One day, Linda told Margaret that
she should change her will to leave her house to Linda. Margaret refused, saying she planned on
leaving the property to her church. Linda then told her that if she didn't change her will, she would
no longer be able to help Margaret. Margaret changed her will. Is the agreement valid?
Answers
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
This isn't a valid agreement because Margaret could have just called a company that specializes in helping the elderly. Then she could've gotten rid of Linda.
12. An auto manufacturer supplies replacement parts for their vehicles. Although they box the parts with their own logo, the parts are
actually repackaged parts of lower quality. The policy of the manufacturer is to charge full price for these replacement parts.
According to Marshall Clinard and Richard Quinney, what kind of crime is this?
occupational crime
cybercrime
corporate crime
personal crime
Answers
Answer:occupational crime
Explanation:trusrt
explain five relationship between separation of power and checks and balances
Answers
The relationship between the separation of powers and checks and balances is Mutual Restraint, Legislative Oversight, Judicial Review, Appointment and Confirmation, and Lawmaking Process.
The separation of powers is the division of government authority into three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial, each with distinct functions and responsibilities. Checks and balances, on the other hand, refer to the system that ensures no single branch becomes too powerful by providing mechanisms for the branches to restrain or oversee one another.
Here are five key relationships between these concepts:
Mutual Restraint: The separation of powers creates independent branches that can act as a check on the others. For example, the legislative branch can pass laws, but the executive branch can veto them. This ensures that no single branch can dominate or misuse its authority.Legislative Oversight: The separation of powers grants the legislative branch the power to oversee the executive branch through mechanisms such as hearings and investigations. This enables Congress to hold the executive branch accountable for its actions and decisions.Judicial Review: The judiciary, as part of the separation of powers, has the authority to interpret and apply laws. Through judicial review, the courts can check the actions of the legislative and executive branches to ensure they align with the Constitution and established legal principles.Appointment and Confirmation: The separation of powers requires the cooperation of different branches in the appointment and confirmation process. For instance, the executive branch nominates judges and officials, but the legislative branch confirms these appointments, acting as a check on executive power.Lawmaking Process: The separation of powers and checks and balances affect the lawmaking process. The legislative branch proposes and passes laws, while the executive branch can veto them. However, the legislative branch can override the veto with a supermajority vote. This interplay ensures that no single branch has absolute control over the legislative agenda.know more about legislative here:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ8
What is meant by the now common law enforcement motto “to protect and serve?”
A. The motto clearly articulates the need for police officers to protect themselves while serving the community.
B. The motto implies that protecting the public is a service, and when economic hardship arises, services will be cut.
C. The motto identifies the two pillars of effective law enforcement: protecting citizens and serving them through public service.
D. The motto implies that the scope of responsibility for a police officer is limited to offering protection when needed and offering a specific service; police officers should not be expected to be vigilant and aware of other needs the community may have.
Answers
Explanation:
c The motto identifies the two pillars of effective...
i don't need help but why do you need to pay for pemium
Answers
Answer:because the people are greedy and want more money they cant just help lol
Explanation:
A. How can the Legislative Branch check the Executive Branch?
1.
2.
3.
4.
give four reasons
Answers
Answer: The Legislative Branch can check the Executive Branch because:
1. They can override a veto if ⅔ of the
Legislative wants to.
2. They vote on a Supreme Court Confirmation.
3. They have a House of Representatives (electoral college), which votes for a president.
4. They have the power to impeach a president.
Hope this helps!
Project: Understanding the Advantages and Risks of Collaborations Between Private Security and Law Enforcement Agencies
As you have learned in this lesson, there are advantages to collaborations between private security and law enforcement agencies. Sharing of resources, information, and training strengthen these collaborations. There are also some drawbacks and potential risks in these collaborations. In this exercise, you will read an article written by an expert in these matters and make an argument for whether you think the benefits outweigh the risks or if the risks outweigh the benefits.
Instructions
Begin by reading Public-Private Partnerships in Homeland Security: Opportunities and Challenges.
If you have any difficulty with vocabulary or sentences, get clarification from your instructor.
After you have read the article, write an editorial that might appear in a local newspaper expressing your opinion about the advantages or disadvantages collaborations between private security and law enforcement agencies.
Assume that your editorial has prompted much public discussion and that you have been asked to make a presentation setting forward your opinion to a group of civic leaders. Your speech should be at least five minutes in length and address the more important points in your original editorial.
Question # 1
File Upload
Submit your editorial article expressing your opinion about the advantages and disadvantages of collaboration between private security and law enforcement.
In addition, submit your five-minute speech in which you present your opinion to a group of civic leaders. Make sure that your speech addresses the important points in your original editorial.
Answers
The editorial that might appear in a local newspaper expressing your opinion about the advantages or disadvantages collaborations between private security and law enforcement agencies is given below
What is the collaborations between private security and law enforcement agencies?There has been consistent rise in the extent of crime been committed by people. More formal collaborations are created to handle more particular or comprehensive demands, such as the defense of vital infrastructure against terrorist threats or the requirement for more workers to combat pervasive crime.
More formal collaborations are created to handle more particular or comprehensive demands, such as the defense of vital infrastructure against terrorist threats or the requirement for more workers to combat pervasive crime.
The partnership can go far beyond information exchange to encompass preventive and investigative activities as well as improved emergency response to events like workplace violence, natural disasters, and terrorism. This is true of any public-private interaction.
Lastly, the disadvantages in the collaborations between private security and law enforcement is that law enforcement database or information may be breached by private selfish firm and used for other purposes.
Hence, to ensure private security and local law enforcement can collaborate, In regards to sharing information: Private security and law enforcement can share information about threats, incidents, and investigations. This will help them to stay informed about potential dangers and be better prepared to respond if necessary.
Learn more about private security from
https://brainly.com/question/14327993
#SPJ1
This chapter discusses that drug use can have both positive and negative results, depending on how it is used and why. Do you think a drug that is currently illegal but is found to have some positive results in the medical field should be completely
outlawed for any type of use? Think of heroin or cocaine, it is illegal to use or possess in the U.S. but if something positive could come from the use do you think it should be allowed. Explain your answer. 2 cited sources.
Answers
I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, but I can provide a balanced perspective on the topic. The question of whether a currently illegal drug with potential medical benefits should be completely outlawed for any type of use is a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach.
On one hand, it is important to consider the potential benefits that such drugs can have in the medical field. For example, studies have shown that heroin-assisted treatment can be an effective option for treating opioid addiction (Kerr et al., 2017). Similarly, cocaine has been used as a local anesthetic in eye surgery and is still used in some countries for that purpose (Narvaez, 2014). Banning the use of these drugs outright may prevent patients from receiving effective treatment for their medical conditions.
On the other hand, legalizing drugs with a history of abuse and addiction carries significant risks. It may lead to increased availability, misuse, and addiction, especially among vulnerable populations such as teenagers and low-income individuals. Additionally, drug legalization may send the wrong message to society that drug use is acceptable and may lead to an increase in crime rates, accidents, and public health costs.
In conclusion, while the potential medical benefits of currently illegal drugs should be considered, the risks of legalization should also be carefully evaluated. A thorough analysis of the benefits and risks, as well as the potential impact on public health and safety, should guide any decision regarding drug policy.
Tyrone and Angelique see an ad for "freight-damaged dining room tables on sale for $300." They go to the store where Al explains that the damaged tables have been sold.
However, they do have dining room tables for $600 in stock.
Answers
Answer:False advertisment
Explanation:
What is the probability that the suspect was at
the crime scene, based on the TLC results?
What arguments would the suspect's lawyer
make to weaken the TLC evidence?
Answers
Answer:
you could ask stuff like did 1 person or a team examinant it because if 1 did it could be a false because his a dirty cop or person feeling got in the way and really it depends on the evidence if its a piece of hair at a grocery store before a muder then the lawyer could say he could of got grocery's before the muder even happens
but lets say the find his blood the prosecutor could say the muder suspect tried to fight the attacker and lost and the defendant dose not have much he could do
finale if a muder took place in a area people cant go and a hair or blood of the suspect the defendant could try to go from muder to trespassing with manslaughter or self defense or maby if its a very very very good lawer they could try for the person tryed to Assault the suspet and he had nowere so run so he jumped the fence and had to fight the jon/jane doe(if u dont no what that means it means a dead person that we dont no the name of) and won
hope this helps but the main thing is it depends on were are what they find
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answers
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
Officer Jax was new on the job. He saw a man dressed all in black sneak in to an apartment through the front door. Jax followed him and busted
down the door. He grabbed the man in black and yelled, "Got ya', you crook!" The man lived there and was quietly entering the apartment, because
his wife, who was a nurse and had worked the night shift, was still asleep. Jax violated the man's rights against unreasonable searches and
seizures guaranteed by which Amendment?
the Fifth Amendment
O the Eighth Amendment
the Fourth Amendment
O the Sixth Amendment
Answers
Answer:
The Fourth Amendment.
From the Constitution:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I hope this helped!
Most civil cases are resolved in a trial.
OA.
True
ов.
False
Answers
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Answer:
false
Explanation:
it's most likely false because it costs lots of money to go to court while people can just settle it then and there.
Think of an example that illustrate the concept, "Correlation does not equal causation." SOCIOLOGY 1 PLEASE HELPPP!
Answers
Answer:You may eat a not-so-fresh food item, and then feel sick, but that may just be because of a cold or flu
Explanation:
Which of these describes one of the ways an entrepreneur typically takes
ownership of a childcare business?
(1 point)
O chooses which laws apply to the business
assumes risk for success or failure
decides which expenses are fixed
teaches all of the classes
Answers
An entrepreneur typically takes ownership of a childcare business by choosing which laws apply to the business.
Who is an entrepreneur?
A person who undertakes the risk of starting a new business venture is called an entrepreneur.
An entrepreneur creates a firm to realize their idea, known as entrepreneurship, which aggregates capital and labor in order to produce goods or services for profit.
Entrepreneurship is highly risky but also can be highly rewarding, as it serves to generate economic wealth, growth, and innovation.
The way entrepreneurs file and pay taxes will depend on how the business is set up in terms of structure
Learn more about entrepreneur here:
https://brainly.com/question/13897585
#SPJ1
OK so I wrote a question that I put an answer to because I had found out the correct answers for the question. I felt like it would be nice if there wasn't any guessing for that question because if you try to find the answer for the question they were all wrong. Then someone named "Supernova" reported my question/answer for putting the answer in the question because somehow that's WRONG. So am I wrong for wanting people to know the right answer to the question?
Answers
Answer:
no you're not in the wrong
The last Epistle Paul wrote was:
Titus
2 Thessalonians
2 Timothy
Philemon
Romans
Answers
Answer:
2 Timothy
Explanation:
Answer: 2 Timothy
Explanation: The Second Epistle to Timothy is one of the three pastoral epistles traditionally attributed to Paul the Apostle. Addressed to Timothy, a fellow missionary, it is traditionally considered to be the last epistle he wrote before his death.
The table summarizes the educational degrees of four applicants. There are three jobs open in this career cluster including Police Detective, Legal Assistant, and Arbitrator.
Summary of Degrees for Applicants Applying to Law, Public Safety, and Security Careers
Applicant
Degrees Earned
Applicant 1
High school diploma, associate’s degree
Applicant 2
High school diploma, bachelor's degree, doctoral degree
Applicant 3
High school diploma
Applicant 4
High school diploma, bachelor's degree
Q~ Which applicants would be best qualified for the jobs based on educational level?
A~ Applicants 1 and 2 are qualified to be Arbitrators, Applicant 3 is qualified to be a Legal Assistant, and Applicant 4 is qualified to be a Police Detective.
B~ Applicant 3 is qualified to be an Arbitrator, Applicants 2 and 4 are qualified to be Legal Assistants, and Applicant 1 is qualified to be a Police Detective.
C~ Applicants 2 and 4 are qualified to be Arbitrators, Applicants 1 and 4 are qualified to be Legal Assistants, and Applicant 3 is qualified to be a Police Detective.
D~ Applicant 4 is qualified to be an Arbitrator, Applicants 2 and 3 are qualified to be Legal Assistants, and Applicants 1 and 3 are qualified to be Police Detectives.
Answers
Answer: Applicants 2 and 4 are qualified to be Arbitrators, Applicants 1 and 4 are qualified to be Legal Assistants, and Applicant 3 is qualified to be a Police Detective.
Explanation: Some arbitrator roles require a law degree, but many do not. Most, however, do require a bachelor's degree.
Applicant 2: High school diploma, bachelor's degree, doctoral degree
Applicant 4: High school diploma and bachelor's degree
would be best qualified for the jobs based on educational level. Thus, option C is correct.
Who is an applicant?An applicant can be termed as the part where the person will be required to do a job and this will be based on the qualification that he or she will have. This suggests the part that was taken and the education and knowledge that they will have.
Applicants 2 and 4 are classified and can become Arbitrators, Applicants 1 and 4 are qualified to be Legal Assistants, also there is Applicant 3 who will be able to become Police Detective. They will have various degrees that they will use and the person will be termed to be having a job if they desire in a particular field. Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about applicant, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29039611
#SPJ6
1. Explain what Siegal says is his focus.
2. Why is jargon in legal communications harmful?
3. Why do you think companies, the government, and others have resisted putting agreements and legal information in simple terms.
4. Is the Internet a private place? Why or why not?
5. According to Kovacs, should sites have to ask before they collect data on users? Do you agree or disagree? Why?
6. Explain what protections are available for people and consumers in terms of what data can be collected by different sites.
7. What does Kovacs compare digital tracking to in the physical world? How do you feel about this type of tracking and why?
8. Explain why sites collect information about our behaviors online.
(Please answer all, thank you!)
Answers
Answer:
I'm not an expert in this subject but I'll try to answer some of the questions the best I can:
Explanation:
2. Jargon in legal communications can be harmful because it can be confusing and difficult for non-experts to understand. This can lead to misunderstandings and complications, and may also disadvantage individuals who are not familiar with the specialized language used.
3. There may be a number of reasons why companies, the government, and others have resisted putting agreements and legal information in simple terms. These may include the desire to protect their own interests, a belief that the specialized language used in legal documents is necessary for accuracy and precision, and a lack of resources or incentives to create simpler versions of legal documents.
4. The Internet is not a private place in the same way that a person's home or personal belongings are private. While it is possible to limit access to certain personal information online, it is not always easy to do so, and there are many ways in which information can be accessed or shared without an individual's knowledge or consent.
5. Without knowing the specific individual you are referring to or the context in which this question was asked, it is not possible for me to accurately answer this question.
6. There are a number of protections available for people and consumers in terms of what data can be collected by different sites. These may include laws that regulate the collection and use of personal data, as well as privacy policies and terms of service agreements that outline what data a site is allowed to collect and how it can be used.
7. Without knowing the specific individual you are referring to or the context in which this question was asked, it is not possible for me to accurately answer this question.
8. Sites collect information about users' behaviors online for a variety of reasons, such as to personalize content, to serve targeted advertising, to improve site functionality and user experience, and for market research and analysis. This data can be used to understand user preferences and behavior, and to improve the services and products offered by the site.
The correct answers for all of the questions is as follows:
1. The core idea behind Mindsight is described by Dr. Dan Siegel as a technique for focusing the mind on the nature of the internal environment.
2. Legal jargon can be damaging since it can be perplexing and challenging for non-experts to understand in written communications. This may harm those who are unfamiliar with the technical jargon being used and cause misunderstandings and issues.
3. There could be a variety of reasons why businesses, the government, and other parties have opposed simplifying contracts and legal documentation. Among them are the need to safeguard their own interests, the conviction that the technical language used in legal papers is essential for clarity and correctness, and a lack of resources or incentives to produce more straightforward versions of legal documents.
4. Unlike a person's house or their personal things, the Internet is not a location that is private. There are various ways in which information can be accessed or shared without a person's knowledge or consent, and while it is feasible to restrict access to some personal information online, doing so is not always simple.
5. It is impossible for me to provide a correct response to this question without knowing the precise person to whom you are referring or the context of the question.
6. Consumers and people have access to a range of protections regarding the information that various websites may gather about them. These may include rules governing the gathering and use of personal data.
7. It is impossible for me to provide a correct response to this question without knowing the precise person to whom you are referring or the context of the question.
8. Websites gather information on users' online activities for a variety of purposes, including to tailor content, deliver targeted advertising, enhance user functionality, and conduct market research and analysis. The services and products the website offers can be enhanced by using this data to better understand customer preferences and behavior.
Learn more about Dr. Dan Siegal here:
https://brainly.com/question/27108795
#SPJ2
DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND SUPREME COURT OF APEAL
Answers
Answer:
The difference is that the supreme court determines if the law is final and binding, while the constitutional court only deals with constitutional laws.
Explanation:
The constitutional court is established by the constitution.
The supreme court interprets the laws and decides whether a law is relevant or how it should be applied.
The Supreme Court of Appeal, on the other hand, is responsible for hearing appeals from lower courts and ensuring that the law is applied correctly. It is the highest court in the country for non-constitutional matters and has the power to review and change decisions made by lower courts.