Why was it difficult or impossible for the government of the United States
under the Articles, to raise money to pay its expenses? *

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Because "boro" is known for having low coefficients of thermal expansion.

The motive an interest group has to file an amicus curiae brief is to influence a court's interpretation of the law to a litigant's benefit. Therefore, the correct option is B.

The interest group's brief may help a court to better understand the issues, the potential impact of the court's ruling, and the potential consequences of the ruling for individuals or organizations not party to the case.

In detail, an amicus curiae is a "friend of the court" brief filed by an individual or entity who is not a party to the case but has an interest in the outcome. Interest groups are frequently the entities that file amicus briefs, and they do so to offer a perspective that may not be represented by the parties themselves.

In a legal case, the interest group files an amicus brief to support a particular outcome that aligns with the group's interests. The brief's content and argument must be relevant to the case, as the interest group is not allowed to advocate for issues outside of the case's scope.

The goal of an amicus curiae brief is to assist a court in making a decision by providing information or legal analysis. This information can be useful to a court, particularly in cases with far-reaching implications that may affect entities or individuals not a party to the case.

Know more about the an amicus curiae brief click here:

https://brainly.com/question/15520019

#SPJ11

Section 442-C of the New York State Real Property Law states that

who could be held accountable for a salesperson's actions

A broker commits a misdemeanor if he employs a salesperson who does not have the necessary license to do so.

No violation of this article by a real estate salesman or employee of a real estate broker shall be deemed to be cause for the revocation or suspension of the broker's license, unless it appears that the broker had actual knowledge of such violation or retains the benefits, profits, or proceeds of a transaction wrongfully negotiated by his salesman or employee after notice of the salesman's or employee's misconduct.

Learn more about " NYS Real Property Law " to visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/14375848

#SPJ4

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Answer:

Explanation:

In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.

The phrase "double trial" in American courts refers to the possibility of two trials for a single criminal offense.

The first is the criminal trial, in which the state seeks to prove that the defendant committed the crime in question. The second is the civil trial, in which the victim or victim's family seeks damages from the defendant. This double trial makes sense because criminal and civil trials serve different purposes and have different standards of proof.A criminal trial is used to determine whether someone has committed a crime and to impose penalties, such as fines, imprisonment, or death, on those found guilty.

A prosecutor must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, meaning that the evidence must be convincing enough that no reasonable person would doubt the defendant's guilt. This is a high standard of proof that reflects the seriousness of criminal convictions and the state's obligation to prove guilt before punishing someone.A civil trial, on the other hand, is used to determine whether one person or entity is responsible for another person's damages and to award compensation, such as money, to the victim or victim's family.

The plaintiff, or victim, must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning that it is more likely than not that the defendant is responsible for the damages. This is a lower standard of proof than in a criminal trial, reflecting the different goals of civil and criminal proceedings.The double trial makes sense because a person can be acquitted of a crime in a criminal trial but still be held responsible for damages in a civil trial.

For example, in the O.J. Simpson case, Simpson was acquitted of murder in his criminal trial but was found responsible for the deaths of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson in a civil trial and was ordered to pay damages to their families. This illustrates how criminal and civil trials serve different purposes and why it makes sense to have both in certain cases.

To know more about criminal visit :

brainly.com/question/31658194

#SPJ11

Answer:

What type of headlight lens can cut the amount of light it emits by 90 percent? Low beam Keep headlights clean Dirt on the lenses can reduce the light by percent?

Explanation:

The plastic lenses that commonly cover headlight bulbs become cloudy and hazy over time, reducing the amount of light illuminating the road.

Answer:

1. A misdemeanor is a less serious crime than a felony. Felonies are the most serious crimes you can commit and have long jail or prison sentences

2. You can treat the constitution as a sacred article and follow it as such. You can also hold peaceful protests to try and get the government to o things that citizens agree with.

3. The Republicans and Democrats

4. Make sue you read it carefully and discuss it for others for a second opinion

5. federal courts hear criminal, civil, and bankruptcy cases

6. In order to select a new president for the country.

7. The secret ballot helps protect voters from fear of intimidation or coercion.

8. Gooogle said "An absentee ballot is a vote cast by someone who is unable or unwilling to attend the official polling station to which the voter is normally allocated. "

9. Civil courts handle disputes between people as well as divorces or adoptions. Criminal court are for trying people who broke a law.

10. From the internet "Two different kinds of groups of contracts are fixed price contracts and cost-reimbursement contracts. Different types of contracts, which are contained within each of these two types of groups, may be used separately or in combination with one another."

11. They research legal issues for you and pull up legal documents as well as oversee legal assistants or paralegals. Lawyers can specialize in several different areas though.

Hope this helps sorry for the long answers!

Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 law banned child labor and created a federal minimum wage.

In 1938, the FLSA, or Fair Labor Standards Act, was enacted. It is a federal law that was passed to safeguard employees from mistreatment that was taking place during the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression. Businesses would frequently pay employees low wages and require them to work long hours during this time. Although many people, particularly recent immigrants, considered the working conditions to be oppressive, they felt compelled to accept the jobs in order to support their families.

A living wage was established by the FLSA for employees. This is the federally mandated minimum wage that must be paid to employees for each hour of work. This indicates that employers must pay employees at least this specific, regulated amount per hour by law. The minimum wage was just $0.25 an hour when the FLSA was passed in 1938.

Learn more about Fair Labor Standards Act at:

brainly.com/question/16858218

#SPJ4

Answer:

Double Jeopardy right

Explanation:

This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death

A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone.

A security officer is a professional who is trained to secure and protect individuals and property. Security personnel may be found in a variety of settings, including corporate offices, malls, hospitals, and other locations. These professionals are tasked with ensuring the safety of individuals and property under their supervision.

Provocation is a situation in which an individual engages in actions or makes statements that are intended to provoke or incite another person. This may include insults, threats, and other forms of verbal or physical aggression.

A reaction to a stimulus is referred to as a response. This may include a variety of physiological, emotional, and cognitive changes. In terms of behavior, a response is the way in which an individual responds to a particular situation. The response to verbal provocation by a security officer may differ based on the situation and the level of provocation.

A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone. This is due to the fact that the use of force is only allowed when it is reasonable and necessary to prevent harm to oneself or others. When verbal provocation occurs, a security officer should attempt to defuse the situation verbally before resorting to the use of force.

Furthermore, if a security officer uses force in response to verbal provocation, they may face legal consequences, including charges of assault or battery. As a result, it is recommended that security personnel receive training on conflict resolution and effective communication to deal with potentially difficult situations.

You can learn more about security officers at: https://brainly.com/question/28326176

#SPJ11

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

Answer:

Rhode Island

Explanation:

Answer: Poeple are bias, there going to creat something that benefit ls them and not everyone, also if one person creates their own law everyone else will want to do it to which would destroyed our economy

Explanation:

Under civil law, Mark is liable to Don for Don's injury because he acted in a way that caused harm. In this scenario, Mark pushed Don, which caused Don to fall and break his arm.

This is considered a tort, or wrongful act, since Mark acted in a way that resulted in harm to Don. The tort of negligence applies, which means that Mark acted in a careless or negligent way.

Under civil law, Don can bring a lawsuit against Mark to recover damages. He must prove that Mark acted in a negligent way and that Don suffered damages as a result. To do this, Don must show that Mark had a duty to act in a certain way, such as not pushing Don, that Mark breached that duty by pushing Don, and that Don suffered damages as a result.

If Don is successful in his lawsuit, he can recover damages from Mark. This could include medical bills, pain and suffering, and other related costs. He could also be compensated for his lost wages, if any, if he had to miss work due to his injury. Mark is liable for Don's injury under civil law, and Don can seek compensation for his damages in a civil lawsuit.

To know more about civil law refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14788507#

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think it is B

Explanation:

neeed points

Answer:

job availability

Explanation:

many people that went in prison have difficulty finding Employment and the majority 70% felt that criminal records have effect on their job search 2 months of the been released 40% of respondents have been employed at some point since leaving prison but only 31% were currently employed.

one study found that that white job applicants with a criminal record are of half likely to be called back for an interview black applicants are less likely to be called back in general but those with a record called back on your third as often as peers.

also background checks go back 7 years different type of background checks look different results and cover different lengths of time in Canadian personal history in general background checks that typically cover 7 years of Criminal and court records but can't go back any further depending on complication and laws of what's been searched.

Answer:

job availabolty

Explanation:

trust am a Hardvard student

The probability of selecting 3 Democrats and 2 Republicans from the city council is approximately 0.476 or 47.6%.

Let's assume that the city council has 10 members, with 6 Democrats and 4 Republicans.

We can use the idea of combinations to calculate the likelihood of choosing Democrats and Republicans. The binomial coefficient formula can be used to determine how many different ways there are to choose a specific number of Democrats and Republicans.

Probability of selecting 3 Democrats and 2 Republicans:

P(3 Democrats and 2 Republicans) = C(6, 3) × C(4, 2) / C(10, 5)

C(n, k) = the number of combinations of n items taken k at a time.

P(3 Democrats and 2 Republicans) = (6 choose 3) * (4 choose 2) / (10 choose 5)

= (20) × (6) / (252)

= 120 / 252

= 0.476

Learn more about Democrats at:

brainly.com/question/14213873

#SPJ4

If you commit copyright infringement for the first time, you will face a 5-year prison sentence. Five years prison time!

If you continue to commit copyright infringement after being caught, you will face a 15-year prison sentence. A repeat copyright violator faces a sentence of fifteen years in prison. To repeatedly violate someone else's copyright, you must be genuinely committed to staying in jail.

When any work is legally protected by copyright and is used without permission for which such consent is necessary, it is violating certain exclusive rights provided to the copyright holder and is commonly referred to as copyright infringement, which was formerly known as just piracy.

To avoid copyright infringement, look for material with Fair Use Copyright. The fair use doctrine allows for any copying of intellectual property that is done for a particular and beneficial purpose. To keep yourself out of bars, try to steer clear of piracy.

Learn how the offender will pay for infringing on copyright materials: https://brainly.com/question/16774161

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources. Among other things, this law authorizes EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and public welfare and to regulate emissions of hazardous air pollutants. One of the goals of the Act was to set and achieve NAAQS in every state by 1975 in order to address the public health and welfare risks posed by certain widespread air pollutants. The setting of these pollutant standards was coupled with directing the states to develop state implementation plans (SIPs), applicable to appropriate industrial sources in the state, in order to achieve these standards. The Act was amended in 1977 and 1990 primarily to set new goals (dates) for achieving attainment of NAAQS since many areas of the country had failed to meet the deadlines. Section 112 of the Clean Air Act addresses emissions of hazardous air pollutants. Prior to 1990, CAA established a risk-based program under which only a few standards were developed. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments revised Section 112 to first require the issuance of technology-based standards for major sources and certain area sources. "Major sources" are defined as a stationary source or group of stationary sources that emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons per year or more of a hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year or more of a combination of hazardous air pollutants. An "area source" is any stationary source that is not a major source. For major sources, Section 112 requires that EPA establish emission standards that require the maximum degree of reduction in emissions of hazardous air pollutants. These emission standards are commonly referred to as "maximum achievable control technology" or "MACT" standards. Eight years after the technology-based MACT standards are issued for a source category, EPA is required to review those standards to determine whether any residual risk exists for that source category and, if necessary, revise the standards to address such risk.

Explanation: im just different

The process of selling government-owned businesses to private individuals is referred to as privatization. Privatization is the process of transferring government-owned assets to the private sector, typically by selling them to private individuals or organizations that will then assume responsibility for managing them.

A few points that explain the process of privatization are mentioned below:The government entity must first decide which businesses will be privatized, as well as the objectives and goals of privatization, in order to begin the privatization process. The government is responsible for determining whether the privatization of a specific company or industry is likely to produce the desired outcome.In many instances, the government will bring in outside consultants to evaluate the businesses and make recommendations for improvement.

The government will then establish guidelines and procedures to govern the privatization process.In order to attract private buyers, the government will typically initiate a marketing campaign to promote the sale of the businesses. Interested parties may be invited to bid on the businesses, with the highest bidder typically receiving the privilege of purchasing the business.In some instances, governments might offer incentives to entice companies to participate in the privatization process. For example, governments may offer tax incentives, financing, or other forms of financial assistance to help businesses meet their privatization objectives.The privatization process is completed when the government-owned businesses are sold to private individuals or organizations. Private owners take over the management of the businesses, and the government ceases to play a role in their management or operation.

To know more about government businesses, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29894427

#SPJ11

the answer is c Economic growth

The manner in which a law is implemented distinguishes it from an executive order.

Either the President of the United States or the Governor of a state may issue an executive order. The President's directives are related to how the federal government is run. They are frequently employed by governors in issues involving public health.

An executive order has legal standing, thus breaking it could have repercussions. Also, executive orders are often issued considerably more quickly than laws. Unlike presidential orders, which cannot be revoked by Congress, laws must be approved by Congress.

Additionally, they are both well-documented and formally recorded. The Code of Federal Regulation, the official compilation of all federal rules and regulations, governs both presidential executive orders and federal statutes.

To know more about "executive order" visit-

brainly.com/question/18973126

#SPJ4

There were several changes that caused agencies like the Pinkerton Detective Agency to reduce private policing efforts

Some states began requiring security licenses, which made it harder for private policing agencies to operate without meeting certain requirements and regulations.

Criminals began to attack private force officers, which made the job more dangerous and less appealing for potential hires.

Decreases in pay made private policing less lucrative, which led to fewer individuals being interested in pursuing a career in the industry.

The growth of public police forces also played a role, as they began to take on more responsibility for maintaining law and order, which reduced the demand for private policing services.

Overall, these factors contributed to a decline in the popularity and effectiveness of private policing agencies, leading many to reduce their efforts or go out of business entirely.

Learn more about private policing efforts from

https://brainly.com/question/30479209

#SPJ1

Answer:

All State governments are modeled after the Federal Government and consist of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The U.S. Constitution mandates that all States uphold a “republican form” of government, although the three-branch structure is not required.

Explanation:

pls mark as brain list