WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND THANKS
+ 25 POINTS
Which of the following is the term used to describe the part of an arrest when a defendant is fingerprinted, photographed and put in a holding cell?
A. INITIAL APPEARANCE
B. DELIBERATIONS
C. BOOKING
D. NOVATION

The three-word expression used to describe whether a congressional body will approve or deny treaties and nominations for ambassadors, public ministers, and judges are senate, advice and consent.

Learn more about the Constitution of US with the help of the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/838122

#SPJ4

Answer:

no

Explanation:

this will help the criminals to be alert of officers

These first ten amendments to the Constitution became known as the Bill of Rights and still stand as both the symbol and foundation of American ideals of individual liberty, limited government, and the rule of law. Most of the Bill of Rights concerns legal protections for those accused of crimes.

A constitution is a set of basic rules that govern how a country or state is governed.

Learn more about Constitution here: https://brainly.com/question/21235714

#SPJ4

Depending on where you are in your teaching career, being a paralegal might take two to seven years.

An associate degree takes around two years to complete, a bachelorette's degree takes four years, and a master's degree takes two years. Amarillo College is a public, two-year institution that provides an Associate in Applied Science in paralegal studies with a goal on small class sizes, networking opportunities, and a knowledgeable staff of paralegals and attorneys while preparing students for public instrument testing. For scalable, this programme must be finished at least twice and takes 60 credit hours. Paralegal classes are offered in the evenings and on weekends, while general studies courses are offered throughout the day and night.

Learn more about paralegal certificate at

https://brainly.com/question/29345945

#SPJ4

The statement "a contract entered into by a mentally incompetent person can be valid if the person had capacity at the time the contract was formed." is false as it is a void contract.

A contract signed by a person who is mentally incompetent is typically regarded as void or voidable. According to the legal concept of capacity, each party to a contract must be mentally capable of comprehending the terms and ramifications of the agreement. A contract may be deemed invalid if a party did not have the mental capacity to enter into it at the time, whether as a result of mental illness, an intellectual disability or other circumstances.

The justification for this is to safeguard people who might be defenseless or incapable of making wise decisions. However, since mental capacity laws and regulations can differ from one jurisdiction to the next, it is crucial to refer to specific jurisdictional laws for a more thorough understanding.

Learn more about contract at:

brainly.com/question/32327870

#SPJ4

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Option- a, b &d: promotion of exports, export controls and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act were addressed in the export expansion section of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act

The Omnibus Trade Competitiveness Act was designed to address seemingly unfair trade practices, effectively manage trade deficits, and help businesses become more competitive internationally.

The Omnibus Trade Competitiveness Act was designed to address seemingly unfair trade practices, effectively manage trade deficits, and help businesses become more competitive internationally.

To learn more about ‘Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act’, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14635310

#SPJ4

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

I've learned this before and I know its fact

Answer:

The Criminal Defense of Mistake

In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.

Mistakes of Fact

Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.

Mistake of Law

Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.

Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:

When the law has not been published;

When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;

When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or

When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.

Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.

It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.

Mistake and Strict Liability

Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.

Answer: Therefore, assault is defined as an attempt or threat to injure another person, while battery occurs when there is actually harmful or offense contact with another person. Because assault is the threat of harm and battery is the act of harming another person, these two crimes are often charged together. Child abuse is a legal term to define illegal acts towards a child. A criminal act of child abuse may have another name reflective of the type of abuse. Physical child abuse is most often charged as the crime of assault or assault of a child.

Explanation:

Answer d

Explanation:

D: A democracy is where the people make chocies not powerful people.

According to the CDC, Louisiana had the 10th highest rate of drug overdose deaths in the United States in 2020.

The target population for my intervention is individuals who are currently using opioids in Louisiana.

According to the CDC, an estimated 721,000 people in Louisiana used opioids in 2020. The opioid crisis is a national problem. In 2020, there were over 93,000 drug overdose deaths in the United States, and over 70% of those deaths involved opioids.

There are a number of existing programs in Louisiana that are designed to address the opioid crisis. These programs include:

The Louisiana State Opioid Response (LaSOR) Program, which provides funding for prevention, treatment, and recovery services for individuals with or at risk for opioid use disorder.

The Louisiana Opioid Crisis Response Fund, which provides funding for community-based organizations that are working to address the opioid crisis.

My top priority intervention is to expand access to evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder. This includes increasing the number of treatment providers, expanding insurance coverage for treatment, and reducing the stigma associated with addiction.

The estimated cost of expanding access to MAT in Louisiana is $50 million per year. This cost would be offset by the savings in healthcare costs.

Learn more about epidemics on

https://brainly.com/question/24222732

#SPJ1

Answer:

C. Bonds

Explanation:

A P E X

Savings accounts, cash ISAs, annuities, government bonds and protected funds are considered low risk investments. Cash is the most stable investment option, but the returns are not usually as high as fixed-interest securities.

Correct option is C.

"Bonds" are an example of a low-risk investment.

A bond is a financial instrument that allows an investor to lend money to a borrower, such as a corporation or the government. The money is used to fund the borrower's operations, and the investor is paid interest on the investment. A bond's market value might fluctuate over time.

To know more about Low-risk investment, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/25264302

Contracts in restraint of trade always violate one or more federal or state statutes.

The above statement is True.

To know more about Contracts here

https://brainly.com/question/5746834

#SPJ4

Explanation:

Student government is a group of students that are charged with managing a wide range of events, activities, programs, policies, and initiatives around the school. Some members are elected by the student body, and others may be appointed by the elected officials to help with specific tasks or areas of interest.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

I think D because the sons of liberty would boycott British goods. This was to show "No taxation without representation"

The correct answer is d. No one can watch you vote or look at your marked ballot. Voting by secret ballot guarantees the privacy and confidentiality of each voter's choices, ensuring a fair and unbiased electoral process.

Voting by secret ballot means that no one can watch you vote or look at your marked ballot. It ensures the privacy and confidentiality of each voter's choices. Let's break down the options to better understand why each one is incorrect or incomplete: a. Only the candidate you vote for can watch your marked ballot: This is not correct because voting by secret ballot guarantees that no one, including the candidate, can watch your marked ballot. It ensures that your voting choice remains confidential. b. No one can watch you vote except the election officer: This option is also incorrect. Voting by secret ballot means that no one, including the election officer, can watch you vote. It is essential to maintain the privacy and independence of the voting process.

c. The voter should not tell anyone for whom he/she voted: While this option partially captures the idea of voting by secret ballot, it doesn't fully explain the concept. Voting by secret ballot goes beyond not telling anyone for whom you voted. It ensures that no one can observe or determine your voting choice, guaranteeing your privacy.d. No one can watch you vote or look at your marked ballot: This is the correct answer. Voting by secret ballot means that no one can watch you vote or look at your marked ballot. It protects the integrity of the voting process and ensures that your choices remain confidential.

To know more about confidentiality visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31139333
#SPJ11

Answer:

A) can go

Explanation:

I believe that anyone can get over drug usage and substance abuse if he or she can just find out ways to stop them selves from using drugs then they can get over it for the rest of their life. Another solution can be to exercise so they can get their mind off of using drugs.

No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.

The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.

Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.

The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.

Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:

https://brainly.com/question/32959753

#SPJ11

The President nominates someone for a vacancy on the Court and the Senate votes to confirm the nominee, which requires a simple majority.

Answer:

B - Major Crime

Explanation:

Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.

Answer:

1-2-3-4 NO / Who's to say an officer didnt write that inside the cell to have a quick and speedy trial where they are both found guilty but one with a lesser term  ? Even if prior to Moe and Larry being kept in SEPERATE cells , this would make it seem more evident that they are blaming Moe for the murder. Larry could have accepted a plea deal to get a shorter sentencing then Moe and only face Burgulary charges indefinite to the counts of murder Larry could face.

Explanation:

EVEN if this is true and Larry commited the henious crime , it cannot be used against him in terms of evidence since when he first got arrested and it was informed to him of his rights under Miranda Law he still pleas the fifth here in the excerpt "Both Larry and Moe refused to make any statement (invoking their Fifth Amendment protections)" this is prior to getting arrested and prior to being interrogated , This does'nt mean either of them are guilty yet BUT makes them look suspicious/guilty infront of the jury. This is because they didn't want to be interrogated or questioned.

The Writing Requirement:The writing requirement is an important rule that applies to certain types of contracts. According to the rule, some types of contracts must be in writing in order to be enforceable in court.

A contract that involves a sale of goods for more than $500, for example, must be in writing. The same is true for contracts that involve a transfer of an interest in land. Additionally, any contract that cannot be performed within one year must be in writing.

Jason Novell, doing business as Novell Associates, hired Barbara Meade to work for him.The parties orally agreed on the terms of employment, including payment of a share of the company's income to Meade, but they did not put anything in writing. Two years later, Meade quit. Novell then told Meade that she was entitled to $9,602 - 25% of the difference between the accounts receivable and the accounts payable as of Meade's last day of work.

To know more about Writing Requirement visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30637192

#SPJ11

This statement is true.

The Anti-Federalists opposed the passage of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they believed that, in the lack of a bill of rights, the new national government would be overly influential and harm individual liberty.

Their opposition played a significant role in the First Amendment's and the other nine amendments that make up the Bill of Rights' adoption.

The 1787 Constitutional Convention created the document, which required ratification by nine or more state conventions.

A conflict arose over ratification, with the Federalists supporting a powerful union and the Constitution's adoption and the Anti-Federalists opposing the establishment of a powerful national government and denying ratification.

To know more about constitution, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ4

Age  determines the jurisdiction of the juvenile court,  whereas the nature of the offense determines jurisdiction in the adult system.

This is a court system that is made for the offenders in the society who are not up to the legal age of adult courts.

The juvenile courts is where they are tried before they are sent to the juvenile prisons for the offenses that tghey commit.

Read more on juvenile court here: https://brainly.com/question/11399114

Legal letters are written communications that convey legal information, requests, or demands between parties involved in legal matters.

A step-by-step description of writing a legal letter:

1. Identify the Purpose: Determine the specific purpose of the legal letter, whether it is to demand action, provide information, make a request, or initiate legal proceedings.

2. Format and Heading: Use a professional business letter format. Include your name, address, and contact information at the top, followed by the recipient's details, date, and a formal salutation.

3. Introduction: Start with a clear and concise opening that states the purpose of the letter and provides a brief overview of the matter at hand.

4. Background Information: Provide relevant background information, including dates, events, or circumstances leading up to the issue at hand. Present factual information objectively and accurately.

5. Legal Analysis: Present a clear and coherent legal analysis of the situation. Identify relevant laws, regulations, or contractual provisions applicable to the matter and explain how they support your position or claim.

6. Supporting Evidence: Include any supporting documents, such as contracts, agreements, or other relevant materials that strengthen your argument or support your position.

7. Clear and Specific Requests: Clearly state the desired outcome or action you are seeking from the recipient. Be specific and provide a deadline or timeframe for response or compliance.

8. Conclusion: Summarize the main points of the letter, reiterate the requested action or response, and express your willingness to engage in further discussion or negotiation if applicable.

9. Closing and Signature: Use a professional closing, such as "Sincerely" or "Yours faithfully." Sign the letter with your name, title, and contact information.

10. Proofread and Review: Carefully proofread the letter for grammar, spelling, and clarity. Review the content to ensure it is accurate, logical, and effectively conveys your message.

11. Sending and Keeping Copies: Send the original letter by certified mail or another reliable method to ensure proof of delivery. Make copies of the letter and any attachments for your records.

Note: It is important to consult with a qualified legal professional for specific advice and guidance when writing legal letters, as the content and approach may vary depending on the jurisdiction and nature of the legal matter.

Know more about the Legal letters here:
https://brainly.com/question/30935916

#SPJ8

Answer:  Similarities between republic government and democracy are that  the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives or  is ruled by representatives of the citizen body.

Explanation: I hope this helps :)

Plz tell me if it was wrong so i can Fix it :)

In the professional area, these are a few role conflicts that exist:

Job conflict happens when employees are given multiple, incompatible roles at once or when their role overlaps with that of another employee or workgroup. A worker is more likely to experience stress at work if there is more role conflict.

A role conflict typically arises when someone is pulled in several different ways as they attempt to respond to the numerous statuses they have. The most frequent role conflict is between a person's commitments at work and at home, or between professional and personal responsibilities.

Learn more about role conflict, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13603130

#SPJ1

Answer: tbh it really depends

Explanation: