1. From outside research, what is the history of marijuana/hemp use? In other words, list and describe its many uses in the past (medical, fabric, paper, etc).
2. From the lecture this week, what is it that makes demonizing marijuana (1) possible at all and (2) a very effective tool to get legislation passed?
Answer:
1. The history of marijuana and hemp use dates back thousands of years. Throughout various civilizations, marijuana/hemp has been utilized for its versatile properties. Some of its past uses include:
- Medicinal Purposes: Marijuana has a long history of medicinal use in different cultures. Ancient Chinese, Indian, and Egyptian civilizations used marijuana as a treatment for various ailments such as pain, inflammation, and digestive issues. It was also used as an anaesthetic in surgical procedures.
- Fiber and Textiles: Hemp fibres derived from the cannabis plant have been used for centuries to make fabrics, ropes, and textiles. Hemp fibres are strong, durable, and resistant to mildew, making them suitable for making clothing, sails, and other products.
- Paper Production: Hemp has been used as a source of paper for centuries. In ancient China, hemp fibres were used to create the world's earliest paper. The strength and durability of hemp fibres made it an ideal material for producing parchment, books, and documents.
- Construction Material: Hemp fibres have also been used in construction. Hempcrete, a mixture of hemp fibres and lime, has been employed to make sustainable and eco-friendly building materials. The fibres provide strength and insulation properties to the construction material.
2. Demonizing marijuana as a substance has been made possible and effective through various factors:
- Cultural and Societal Factors: Throughout history, certain cultural and societal beliefs have associated marijuana with negative connotations. These beliefs may stem from moral or religious views, and they influence public opinion and perception of the drug.
- Political and Economic Factors: Marijuana has been the subject of political and economic interests. Demonizing marijuana has often served political agendas, allowing politicians to appear tough on crime or to cater to specific interest groups. Additionally, industries such as pharmaceuticals, timber, and alcohol have had economic motivations to suppress competition from hemp and marijuana industries.
- Propaganda and Misinformation: The spread of misinformation and propaganda about marijuana has played a significant role in demonizing the substance. Misleading narratives about the dangers of marijuana have been used to create fear and sway public opinion.
- Racial and Social Bias: Historically, racial and social biases have contributed to the demonization of marijuana. In the United States, marijuana was associated with marginalized communities, particularly African Americans and Hispanics. These racial biases fueled the stigmatization and criminalization of marijuana use.
- Legislative and Legal Actions: Demonizing marijuana has been an effective tool to pass legislation and enforce strict drug policies. By portraying marijuana as a dangerous and harmful substance, lawmakers have been able to justify criminal penalties and restrictions on its use, cultivation, and distribution.
Explanation:
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Helppp please!
From the standpoint of labeling theory, deviance and crime are not absolutes - a behavior can be called deviant or criminal only when it violates the norms of some group. Obviously, this suggests that definitions of deviance will change as societies advance.
Discuss what behaviors now considered acceptable were formerly thought to be deviant or criminal.
Are there any now considered deviant or criminal that were once considered acceptable?
Is there a trend toward defining more behaviors as deviant and criminal or more as acceptable?
Do you detect any trends in the process of change? If so, what are they?
According to the labeling theory, authorities' labels have a negative impact on the powerless and lead to criminal and deviant behavior.
Labeling is a crucial idea related to official bias in intergenerational transmission. According to the labeling theory, criminal justice reforms tend to make offenders worse. To be more specific, labeling happens when someone's criminal behavior worsens after being involved in the justice system. The labeling theory proposes that when a label for deviance is placed on a person, that person adopts the label by engaging in the behaviors, actions, and attitudes that are associated with the label. According to the labeling theory, when others impose an identity on someone, that person becomes deviant.To know more about crime here
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Which situation best illustrates an effect of the law of supply
A. A car company increase sales when incomes rise in a city
B. A food truck shuts down after a better food truck opens nearby
C. A theme park gains customers after it lowers its ticket prices
D. A factory stops making a brand of phone after the phones price decreases
Answer: D. A factory stops making a brand of phone after the phones price decreases
Explanation:
The situation best illustrates an effect of the law of supply “A factory stops making a brand of the phone after the phone's price decreases”. Therefore, option D is the correct option.
What is the “law of supply”?The law of supply states that when the price of a commodity or service increases their availability in the market because the manufacturers and the service providers get better prices for them therefore, they generate more.
The concept of the law of supply was proposed in the year 1890 by Alfred Marshall. The law of demand and supply drives the whole market. The needs and manufacturing of goods and services are determined by market sentiments.
The case "A manufacturer stops creating a brand of phone once the phone's price lowers" best exemplifies how the law of supply operates. As a result, choice D is the best one.
Learn more about the law of supply here:
https://brainly.com/question/17805586
#SPJ5
You hear a commercial state that scientific research has proven the effectiveness of a new medication, so it must be effective. True or false?
the colorado real estate commission on its own motion can investigate:
Answer:
The Colorado Real Estate Commission on its own motion can investigate any licensee or unlicensed person if it has reason to believe that the licensee or unlicensed person has violated any provision of the Colorado Real Estate License Law or any rule or regulation promulgated by the Commission. The Commission can also investigate any person who has engaged in any conduct that would be grounds for discipline of a licensee, even if that person is not licensed. The Commission has the authority to conduct investigations, hold hearings, issue subpoenas, and take other actions as necessary to enforce the provisions of the Colorado Real Estate License Law.
hope it helps you.
who were the important thinkers of the classical school, and what heritage did their way of thinking provide?
The important thinkers of the classical school of economics include Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Thomas Malthus.
Their way of thinking emphasized the importance of free markets, limited government intervention, and the self-regulating nature of the economy. This approach provided the foundation for modern economic thought and policy-making.
Adam Smith is widely considered the father of modern economics and his seminal work, "The Wealth of Nations," provided a comprehensive and influential analysis of the principles of free markets, division of labor, and the invisible hand.
David Ricardo developed the theory of comparative advantage, which emphasized the importance of international trade and specialization. Thomas Malthus was known for his work on population growth and the potential consequences of unchecked population expansion.
The classical school's emphasis on individual freedom, market competition, and self-regulation provided a foundation for modern capitalist economic systems.
It influenced economic policy-making and provided the framework for the development of modern economic theory. While some of their theories have been critiqued, the classical school remains a significant and influential part of economic thought.
To know more about modern economic theory click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/10082786#
#SPJ11
What is the best description of Jefferson's overall purpose in these opening paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence?
Thomas Jefferson's primary goal in writing the Declaration of Independence was to produce a persuasive statement that outlined the reasons why America needed to secede from Great Britain.
Jefferson has been criticized more and more by academics despite being long recognized as America's most notable "apostle of liberty." At the popular level, both domestically and internationally, he continues to be an illustrious icon who serves as an inspiration for both major American political parties, as well as for dissidents in communist China, liberal reformers in central and eastern Europe, and aspirant democratic candidates in Africa and Latin America.
His reputation among academics has suffered, too, as the emphasis on racial equality has led to a more unfavorable reappraisal of his reliance on slavery and his idea that American society should continue to be a white man's dominion.
Learn more about Thomas Jefferson's here
https://brainly.com/question/13302527
#SPJ4
tilda purchases an automobile from ronston. at the time of sale, ronston tells tilda that the car has had only one previous owner and has been driven only 25,000 miles. tilda, relying on these statements, purchases the car. she pays 10 percent down and signs a promissory note to pay the remainder of the purchase price, with interest, in fifteen equal monthly installments. ronston transfers the note to patty. tilda then discovers that the car has actually had three previous owners and has been driven 250,000 miles. which of the following is the legal outcome if patty is a holder in due course (hdc)?group of answer choices
Tilda must pay Patty and also make sure to find recourse with Ronston in the situation given above for finding an appropriate legal outcome.
A legal outcome may be referred to or considered as the result or output, which may not be completely desired, but is as per the legal remedies mentioned under the laws related thereto. As per the law, paying to Patty and finding recourse with Ronston is most likely an appropriate legal outcome of the given condition that can be taken into interpretation by Tilda.
Learn more about legal outcome here:
https://brainly.com/question/25901482
#SPJ4
Complete question
tilda purchases an automobile from ronston. at the time of sale, ronston tells tilda that the car has had only one previous owner and has been driven only 25,000 miles. tilda, relying on these statements, purchases the car. she pays 10 percent down and signs a promissory note to pay the remainder of the purchase price, with interest, in fifteen equal monthly installments. ronston transfers the note to patty. tilda then discovers that the car has actually had three previous owners and has been driven 250,000 miles. what is the appropriate legal outcome if patty is a holder in due course (hdc)?
drug court, domestic violence court, teen court and reentry court are all examples of
Drug court, domestic violence court, teen court, and reentry court are all examples of specialized court programs that have been established to address specific legal issues and populations. Drug courts are designed to provide alternative sentencing options for non-violent drug offenders, with an emphasis on treatment and rehabilitation.
Domestic violence courts focus on cases involving intimate partner violence, providing victims with resources and support while holding offenders accountable for their actions. Teen courts are typically run by youth volunteers and offer a restorative justice approach for minor offenses committed by young people. Reentry courts assist individuals who have been released from prison in transitioning back into society, with a focus on reducing recidivism rates through support and services. These specialized court programs recognize the unique needs and challenges faced by certain populations and aim to provide a more effective and just legal system.
To know more about Court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29865285
#SPJ11
Which option is an example of a low-risk investment?
A.
Hedge funds
B.
Mutual funds
C.
Bonds
D.
Stocks
Answer:
C. Bonds
Explanation:
A P E X
Savings accounts, cash ISAs, annuities, government bonds and protected funds are considered low risk investments. Cash is the most stable investment option, but the returns are not usually as high as fixed-interest securities.
Correct option is C.
"Bonds" are an example of a low-risk investment.
A bond is a financial instrument that allows an investor to lend money to a borrower, such as a corporation or the government. The money is used to fund the borrower's operations, and the investor is paid interest on the investment. A bond's market value might fluctuate over time.
To know more about Low-risk investment, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/25264302
Why are techniques or rules to interpret the meaning of statutes necessary?
The techniques or the rules that are used to interpret statutes are very necessary given the fact that they help to justify the decisions that are made by the judges that preside over cases.
What is a statute?The term statute has to do with the enactment that is established by the legislative arm of a nation as a legal document that has to do with the ways that the policies of the nation would have to be carried out as well as the laws and the regulations that are necessary in the area.
The use of statutes is very necessary because it is wha tis used to decide cases by the law courts. The judge would have to base jis decisions based on what the law expects him to do at the moment.
It is necessary to know the statutes so that a person would be able to know the true meaning of the terms that are contained in that statutes.
Read more on government statutes here: https://brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ1
what type of decision delivered by the supreme court is one that sets a new precedent in the law by which all lower courts must abide? group of answer choices moral landmark civil professional ethical
Doctrine of Stare Decisis civil decision delivered by the supreme court is one that sets a new precedent in the law by which all lower courts must abide.
A legal principle known as "stare decisis" requires courts to follow earlier decisions when deciding a case that is similar to the one at hand. Stare decisis makes sure that cases with comparable facts and circumstances are handled the same way. Simply put, it requires courts to uphold the legal precedents established by earlier rulings.
The concept of legal precedent is crucial because the U.S. common law structure has a unified system of adjudicating cases that is based on the principle of stare decisis. A precedent is a previous decision or judgment in a case. Stare decisis requires courts to review prior decisions when presiding over an ongoing case with analogous facts.
Learn more about stare decisis at:
brainly.com/question/21085371
#SPJ4
What law projects that the number of transistors in chips doubles every 18 months, which means that every 10 years, processors are 100 times more powerful, but use the same energy and space?.
According to Moore's law, the number of transistors in semiconductors is expected to double every 18 months, resulting in processors that are 100 times more powerful but consume the same amount of energy and space every 10 years.
According to Gordon Moore's theory, Moore's Law, the number of transistors on a microchip doubles every two years despite computer costs having decreased by half. Moore's Law predicts that the speed and power of computers and transistors will increase each year while their price will decrease. In accordance with Moore's Law, this expansion is exponential. It was not Gordon Moore's intention to create a "law" or call his discovery "Moore's Law." In view of recent advancements in chip manufacturing, Moore stated He had gone to Fairchild Semiconductor to observe. Eventually, Moore's understanding developed into a forecast, which became known as Moore's Law. Theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims that Moores law is disintegrating. He is referring to the 'law' that states the amount of transistors that can fit on a computer chip will double every 18 months, leading to cyclical increases in computing capacity.
Learn more about Moore's law hear :
https://brainly.com/question/28725445
#SPJ4
a. What happened in this case? Why was Atkins given the death penalty?
b. Based on the opinions, what are the strongest arguments for upholding the state Supreme Court decision? For reversing it?
c. How should this case be decided? Explain.
d. Assume the U.S. Supreme Court decides to overturn the Virginia Supreme Court decision. Now assume the Court is presented with a case where a 15-year-old is convicted and sentenced to death in a state that allows such sentences for juveniles. If that case is appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, how might the justices analyze it?
Daryl Atkins and his accomplice abducted Eric Nesbitt, robbed him, forced him to withdraw cash from an ATM, and then shot him eight times. Atkins had a history of felony convictions. During the penalty phase of the trial, Atkins's lawyer presented evidence from a psychologist indicating that Atkins was mildly mentally disabled. The jury imposed the death penalty and the Virginia Supreme Court upheld the sentence. The case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
What are the responses to other questions?Opinion A argues that mentally disabled individuals should be tried and punished for their crimes if they meet the legal requirements of criminal responsibility. Opinion B argues that some states have passed laws exempting mentally disabled defendants from the death penalty, but it argues that not all states have reached a consensus on this issue.
A majority of states have rejected the application of the death penalty to mentally disabled defendants. This aligns with Opinion A, which argues that the Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive punishments and that mentally disabled offenders should be spared from the death sentence. In deciding this case, the court should consider evolving standards of decency and societal consensus.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that the Eighth Amendment forbids the imposition of the death penalty for crimes committed while under the age of 18. A 15-year-old sentenced to death in a state that allows such sentences for juveniles would violate the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment for juveniles.
learn more about U.S. Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
What is the profession of putting the policies of the government into practical application?
______ is the practice of putting the policies of the government into practical application.
a) legislative assistants
b) practice of law
c) public administration
Answer:
c I do believe good luck with the answer
A defendant runs a red light and causes permanent injuries to a plaintiff. The plaintiff suffers a huge loss,
estimated at $500,000 over the course of the plaintiff's lifetime. Why might the plaintiff settle his or her claim
against the defendant for pennies on the dollar (say $10,000)?
The main reason why the plaintiff might settle his or her claim against the defendant for pennies on the dollar (say $10,000) is that the plaintiff would want to avoid a protracted court case.
What is an Out of Court Settlement?This refers to the formal agreement to resolve a case outside of the court's jurisdiction in order to pay for damages usually and avoid a protracted court case.
Hence, we can note that the estimated damages to the plaintiff which is about $500,000 in the lifetime of the plaintiff is a large sum and might not be paid, which would make the plaintiff want an out-of-court settlement to collect a sum of about $10,000.
Read more about out-of-court settlement here:
https://brainly.com/question/2783258
what is right to be forgotten? question 48 options: european law empowering users to have personal information removed from the internet and disconnected from search engines, such as fcc law empowering users to have personal information removed from the internet and disconnected from search engines, such as ftc law empowering users to have personal information removed from the internet and disconnected from search engines, such as gdpr law empowering users to have personal information removed from the internet and disconnected from search engines, such as
The right to be forgotten refers to European law empowering users to have personal information removed from the internet and disconnected from search engines.
The "right to be Forgotten" offers customers the capacity to dispose of content material from public view. With a view to avoid appearing in searches on search engines, it gives a person the authority to ask that news articles, videos, or photos be taken down from internet records.
This clause is a part of the general statistics protection regulation (GDPR), which went into effect in may 2018. The law is designed to defend people's personal information with the aid of giving them the option to ask that outdated, wrong, or beside the point facts about themselves be eliminated from on-line sources.
Learn more about right to be Forgotten at:
brainly.com/question/20001051
#SPJ4
the NIMS management characteristic of chain of command and unity of command means that
The NIMS management characteristic of chain of command and unity of command means that from the highest levels of the organization all the way down to the lowest there is a distinct and unbroken line of authority.
Everyone in the organization is aware of their immediate supervisor and who they report to thanks to the chain of command. Each employee in the company only reports to one direct supervisor. according to the concept of unity of command.
This system aids in making quick, effective decisions while ensuring that everyone is working toward the same goals and objectives. For efficient communication, coordination and decision making during emergencies, a clear chain of command and unity of command are essential.
Learn more about unity of command at:
brainly.com/question/30641469
#SPJ1
Question 7 of 10
Which situation would allow a country to increase the goods it imports
despite spending the same amount of money?
A. The country's government approved an increase in its trade deficit.
B. The country's currency experienced a major decline in interest
rates
C. The inflation rate of the country's currency increased
D. The exchange rate for the country's currency increased
If the nation's currency's exchange rate rose, the import increases while spending same amount.
So, option D. is correct.
Define import.An import is a product or service purchased in one country but made in the other. Import is among the most important aspects of international trade.
If the nation's currency's exchange rate rose, it would help the country to import more items while spending the very same amount of money.
So, option D. is correct.
Find out more information about import here:
https://brainly.com/question/14099397?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
D. The exchange rate for the country's currency increased
Explanation:
a p e ex
HELP ANYONE PLEASE ANSWER FOR ME AND I WILL MARK YOU BRANLIEST WHOEVER ANSWER FIRST AND CORRECT
Answer:
a member of congress
Explanation:
I think im not 100% though
Which of the following statements is true about the early development of English common law? A. English common law is considered civil law. B. English common law is based on French law. C. Rather than inquire into the merits of the case, the chancery court emphasized legal procedure. D. Decisions of the law courts took precedence over those of the Court of Chancery. E. Equitable orders and remedies of the Court of Chancery took precedence over the legal decisions and remedies of the law courts.
E. Equitable orders and remedies of the Court of Chancery took precedence over the legal decisions and remedies of the law courts.
In the early development of English common law, the Court of Chancery played a significant role in administering equitable justice. While the law courts focused on the application of legal principles and remedies, the Court of Chancery emphasized fairness, flexibility, and remedies based on equity. Equitable orders and remedies from the Court of Chancery were considered to have precedence over the legal decisions and remedies of the law courts. This distinction between legal and equitable jurisdictions was an important feature of the early English legal system.
learn more about Chancery here
https://brainly.com/question/31670102
#SPJ11
which of the following is an accurate comparison of conservative and liberal views concerning social policy?
The federal government should permit same-sex unions and only permit unions between one man and one woman is an accurate comparison of conservative and liberal views concerning social policy
Social policy focuses on how societies all over the world satiate people's needs for safety, education, employment, and overall wellbeing. Social policy focuses on how states and societies respond to global challenges such as poverty, migration, and globalisation as well as social, demographic, and economic change.
While some experts and academic institutions view social policy as a subset of public policy, other practitioners see social policy and public policy as two distinct, competing approaches to the same public interest, with social policy being seen as more comprehensive than public policy.
Learn more about social policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/11126731
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
A. The federal government should conduct background checks for guns, The federal government should not restrict an individual’s access to a gun. B. The federal government should regulate and restrict access to abortion procedures, The federal government should restrict a person’s right to privacy and not restrict access to abortion C. The federal government should all same-sex marriage, The federal government should not make policy decision on marriage D. The federal government should allow voluntary prayer in schools for all students, The federal government should allow more state experimentation with school vouchers and charters schools
Which of the following is an accurate comparison of conservative and liberal views concerning social policy?
A. Comparison A
B. Comparison B
C. Comparison C
D. Comparison D
You're deprived of your typical lab equipment but need to detect
hydrocarbons in evidence. Which of the following tools would you
most likely be able to use to release traces of hydrocarbons?
O A cigarette lighter
O A refrigerator
O A fruit-drying machine
O A faucet
Answer:
Lighter is correct
Explanation:
it contains butane
the fbi’s request for access to apple’s encryption code is part of the legal war between
The legal war between the FBI and Apple over access to encryption code.
The FBI's request for access to Apple's encryption code is part of the legal war between the two entities.
The conflict arises from the tension between national security concerns and individual privacy rights.
The FBI has sought access to encrypted data on devices such as iPhones to aid in criminal investigations and prevent potential threats.
However, Apple has maintained that creating a "backdoor" or weakening encryption would compromise the privacy and security of its users.
This legal battle represents a larger debate over the balance between law enforcement's investigative powers and the protection of personal data.
The outcome of such cases can have significant implications for the future of digital privacy and encryption technologies.
For more such questions on encryption, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30186009
#SPJ11
according to the ____ law, a neuron fires an action potential at only one level of intensity.
Answer:
all-or-none
Explanation: Hope this was helpful
How is a student loan different from a scholarship? A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back. A scholarship must be paid back, but a student loan is not paid back. A student loan is a form of financial aid, but a scholarship is not. A scholarship is a form of financial aid, but a student loan is not.
Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Student Loan and scholarshipStudent loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses while scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.
When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.
Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893
Why is the participation of citizens important in the process of allocation of state budget spending priorities?
How has the U.S. Supreme Court defined the legal use of the death penalty?
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.