Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Because it is another type of plagarism cslled self plagarism
Who would have had to follow the precedent
if the case had been decided by a judge in a
state supreme court?
Answer:
Lower courts
Explanation:
I'm assuming you are taking government. I suffered through government last year. So, ik
the u.s. government has created guidelines for ______ who wish to self-govern similarly to the native americans and alaska natives.
The U.S. government has created guidelines for tribes who wish to self-govern similarly to the Native Americans and Alaska Natives. These guidelines are outlined in the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), which was passed in 1975.
The ISDEAA allows tribes to take over the administration of certain federal programs and services that are meant to benefit their communities. This includes healthcare, education, law enforcement, and social services. By self-governing, tribes are able to have more control over their own affairs and can tailor these programs to better meet the needs of their communities.
However, the process of self-governance is not simple and requires a great deal of planning and preparation. Tribes must negotiate a contract with the federal government, which outlines the services they will be taking over and the funding they will receive. They must also have the capacity to manage and administer these programs effectively, which can be a challenge for smaller tribes with limited resources.
To know more about U.S. government visit :
https://brainly.com/question/31358545
#SPJ11
which type e of dispute resolution allows for a board or other group to make ? - Negotiations Conciliation - Arbitration Trial
Answer: Arbitration Trial
Explanation:
Which law has made ethics training even more important?A. Title VII of the Civil Rights ActB. The Fair Labor Standards ActC. Sarbanes-Oxley ActD. The False Claims ActE. The Occupational and Safety Act
The law that has made ethics training even more important is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
What is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act?Federal legislation known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed stringent financial and auditing standards for publicly traded firms. To assist shield shareholders, employees, and the general public from accounting mistakes and dishonest financial activities, legislators enacted the legislation.
The U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30 of that year in an effort to safeguard investors against misleading financial reporting by businesses. 1 Also referred to as the SOX Act of 2002, it required stringent updates to current securities laws and placed severe new penalties on offenders.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act at:
https://brainly.com/question/5481344
#SPJ1
Ellis, a resident of New York, wants to bring a tort claim against Timothy, a resident of Texas, for damage to Ellis's house in New York. To use a long-arm statute to obtain personal jurisdiction over Timothy, the New York court must find that __________. Multiple Choice Ellis also damaged property in Texas and owns a home in Texas Timothy has committed prior torts in New York Timothy owns property in Texas that he purchased ten years ago Timothy committed the tort in New York The damage occurred while Ellis was in his home in New York
To use a long-arm statute to obtain personal jurisdiction over Timothy, the New York court must find that Timothy committed the tort in New York. If the tort occurred in New York, the court can assert its jurisdiction under the long-arm statute.
A long-arm statute is a law that grants a court the authority to exercise jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants based on specific circumstances. In this case, for the New York court to have personal jurisdiction over Timothy, it must establish that Timothy committed the tort, which caused damage to Ellis's house, within the jurisdiction of New York. The location where the tort occurred is a crucial factor in determining whether the court has the authority to exercise jurisdiction over Timothy. If the tort occurred in New York, the court can assert its jurisdiction under the long-arm statute.
However, if the tort occurred outside the state of New York, the court may not have jurisdiction unless other factors, such as Timothy's contacts or activities within New York, can be established to satisfy the requirements of the long-arm statute.
Learn more about long-arm statute here:
brainly.com/question/32137750
#SPJ11
What eligibility requirements are in the constitution for the president.
under north carolina law, which form of oral representation would be allowed?
Under North Carolina law, certain forms of oral representation would be allowed, such as oral contracts, oral testimony in court proceedings, and oral statements made during negotiations or discussions. However, it's important to note that North Carolina, like many jurisdictions, has certain requirements and limitations when it comes to oral representations.
For example, while oral contracts are generally enforceable in North Carolina, certain contracts, such as those involving real estate or contracts that cannot be performed within one year, must be in writing to be enforceable. Additionally, North Carolina law recognizes the "parol evidence rule," which restricts the use of oral evidence to contradict or modify the terms of a written contract.
In court proceedings, oral testimony is an integral part of presenting evidence and making arguments. Parties involved in legal disputes have the right to provide oral testimony or present witnesses who can offer their statements orally. During negotiations or discussions, oral statements can be made, but it is advisable to document important agreements in writing to avoid potential misunderstandings or disputes.
To know more about North Carolina law, click here: brainly.com/question/22564821
#SPJ11
Fill the gaps with appropriate word(s) or phrases
1. .............. represent a person's polítical status by virtue of which he cut alegiance to
particular country.
2. A person having the power to hold manage property for the benefit of one or more
others
........in the day or sense refers to the rights of psople in or cver certain objectives or things.
The gains, benefits and advantages enjuyed or to be enjoyed as well as the loss,
detriments or disadvantages suffered or to be suffered is called......
5. British statutes which were in existence on or before 19 January 1900 were called........
Property could be classified into:
6.
7.
8. The court that has original, appellate and unlimited jurisdiction in all cases is......
9. Which court in Nigeria has a special jurisdiction to handle the revenue matters of the
Federation and other related matters such as custains and cycise?
The general rule is that every person is capabie of contradicting but some categories of
persons have unlimited capacity to contract. These categories of persons are:
10.
Answer:
An act that is performed only by a human being and thus is proper to man. When a human being does such acts, they are called acts of man but not human acts. ... Acts of man, therefore, are acts shared in common by man and other animals, whereas human acts are proper to human beings.
Explanation:
Please mark as brainliest
An effective claim for an argumentative essay is
Answer:
An effective claim in an 'argumentative essay' is a true statement that can be proven using 'facts and cannot be countered'Hence, effective claim in an argumentative essay will be a true statement which is not hypothetical and can be proved with the help of evidences and facts.
Explanation:
the facts and data that support a statement of opinion in the text. the statement that takes a position on an issue or controversy. the explanation of how the evidence in the text supports a reason. the quotations from primary sources that are used to validate a fact.
have a good day
The American Bar Association recommends that all felony cases reach disposition within
a. one year of filing.
b. six months of arrest.
c. six months of filing.
d. one year of arrest.
The American Bar Association recommends that all felony cases reach disposition within one year of filing. The American Bar Association's Standards for Criminal Justice establishes that cases that go on for a long time raise issues for all the parties involved.
The accused, victims, witnesses, and their families, as well as society as a whole, may all be affected by the delay of justice. The Standards seek to decrease delays in criminal trials in order to increase the public's trust in the criminal justice system. The Standards aim to ensure that, while due process rights are upheld, criminal cases are dealt with promptly and efficiently by the system. The criminal justice system must work to guarantee that justice is done quickly, efficiently, and fairly, not only for the accused but also for the victim and society. Defendants have the right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. When the criminal justice system is delayed, it harms the system's reputation, creates anxiety, and raises doubts about the legitimacy of the proceedings.
to know about American Bar Association visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28149117
#SPJ11
which kind of court would handle a criminal case in which the accused is charged with illegally acquiring guns in mexico and selling them to someone in california?
A criminal case involving the illegal acquisition of guns in Mexico and their sale to someone in California would typically be handled by a federal court, specifically the United States District Court for the district where the crime occurred.
The reason for this is that the crime falls under federal jurisdiction because it entails breaking both state and federal laws as well as crossing international and interstate borders.
Federal offences, such as the unlawful importation or exportation of firearms, fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal court system, as do other federal offences.
As a result, the matter would be heard and decided by a federal court.
For such more question on criminal:
https://brainly.com/question/740707
#SPJ11
what is the relation between fundamental rights and directive principles of state policy of Indian constitution..?
Answer:
Board of Governors
The Board of Governors--located in Washington, D.C.--is the governing body of the Federal Reserve System. It is run by seven members, or "governors," who are nominated by the President of the United States and confirmed in their positions by the U.S. Senate.
Explanation:
so the answer part has the Explanation:
Subchapter S corporations have almost no restrictions and are easily formed and operated.
True/False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Answer: false
Explanation:
is there legal harm suffered by marbury? is there a remedy at law? can the supreme court do anything? what is the power of the court?
First, it is important to understand that Marbury did suffer legal harm in the case of Marbury v. Madison. Marbury was appointed by President John Adams to serve as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, but his commission was not delivered before Adams left office.
Second, there is a remedy at law for Marbury's legal harm. Marbury could have filed a writ of mandamus, which would have ordered Madison to deliver the commission. However, the Supreme Court ultimately found that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which allowed for such writs to be filed directly to the Supreme Court, was unconstitutional. Therefore, Marbury was not able to obtain his remedy through the legal system.
Third, despite the fact that the Supreme Court could not provide a remedy for Marbury in this particular case, it is important to understand the power of the court. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and its decisions are binding on all lower courts. Additionally, the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, which means that it can declare acts of Congress or the President unconstitutional. This power is what allowed the Supreme Court to declare the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional in the case of Marbury v. Madison.
To know more about Court visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28567848
#SPJ11
A foreign policy of human rights seeks to ensure which of the following? (choose all that apply)
A foreign policy of human rights seeks to ensure the following-
- that people have basic needs adequately met- that people live in freedom- that people can live in peaceA country's foreign policy or external policy is its targets and activities in terms of its interactions with other states, unions, and different political entities, whether bilaterally or through multilateral systems.
the primary goal of overseas coverage is to use international relations — or speaking, meeting, and making agreements — to solve international issues. they try to hold troubles from growing into conflicts that require army settlements. The President nearly always has the number one obligation for shaping foreign coverage. foreign coverage is the mechanism country wide governments use to guide their diplomatic interactions and relationships with other international locations. A country's overseas coverage displays its values and desires, and allows pressure its political and financial goals in the global arena.
Learn more about foreign policy here: https://brainly.com/question/9909886
#SPJ4
The police obtain a warrant to search the house of a suspect for a gun based on presenting testimony to a magistrate from an informer they have strong reason to believe has a grudge against the suspect, and might even have planted the gun. If the trial court finds this out, what might they do?
Answer:
thorw the case out bc this has happed to ,me
Explanation:
The police acquire a warrant to search a suspect's home for a gun after presenting testimony to a magistrate from an informer they have reason to believe has a grudge against the suspect and may have planted the gun, to exclude the gun as evidence based on the exclusionary rule. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is evidence?
The term “evidence” refers to the proper form of proof that supports a claim. Newspaper articles, historical papers, footprints, signatures, internet sources, files, paperwork, films, medical reports, photographs, and voice recordings are a few examples of the various types of evidence.
The trial court was to determine, and did so in the instance, that the gun was clearly evidence from the person's home. It was unlawful to obtain a gun in the house, according to the rule, which was the exclusionary rule. Although there is adequate proof and the form is properly sized, there is evidence of a fabricated case.
As a result, they exclude the gun as evidence based on the exclusionary rule. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ2
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
Exclude the gun as evidence based on the exclusionary rule.Allow the use of the gun as evidence under the “inevitable discovery” rule.Allow the gun to be used as evidence, but require prosecution of the police afterwards.Gene got medicare before he turned 65 and enrolled into a medicare advantage plan. He calls in february the month before his 65th birthday and is unhappy with his current plan. On the date of the call, what can gene do about his coverage?.
Because he is already on an existing plan of medicare, he can request for an additional coverage to adjust the current plan.
What is a medicare?This is a public program that provides a health insurance to individuals that are aged 65 and over or with a disabilities.
Despite been over 65 years and already on an existing plan of medicare, he can request for an additional coverage to adjust the current plan.
Read more about medicare
brainly.com/question/24908169
#SPJ1
Do you think issues like: Marriage rights and Abortion ought to be decided by: (1)Supreme Court (and therefore apply to ALL Americans the same), (2) have State Legislators vote and decide, or (3) have the voters in each state decide these issues? (There are three options here. Pick one and defend it against the other two.)
Please help
In light of the current issue of IPV and crimes against women, briefly discuss what the implications will be for the police, the courts and correctional services.
Answer:
Intimate partner violence (IPV) and crimes against women are serious issues that have significant implications for the criminal justice system, including the police, the courts, and correctional services.
For the police, the implications may include a greater demand for training and resources to respond effectively to incidents of IPV and crimes against women. This includes specialized training in identifying and responding to domestic violence situations, as well as training on the psychological dynamics of power and control in abusive relationships. There may also be an increased need for collaboration with community organizations and other agencies to provide support to victims.
For the courts, the implications may include a need for specialized judges and court personnel who are knowledgeable about IPV and crimes against women, as well as the availability of specialized court programs, such as domestic violence courts or restorative justice programs, that can provide victims with greater support and protection. There may also be a need to ensure that victims are provided with appropriate legal and other support services to help them navigate the court system.
For correctional services, the implications may include a need for specialized training for correctional staff on the unique needs of female victims of IPV, as well as the development of specialized programming for incarcerated women who have experienced domestic violence. This may include trauma-informed therapy, anger management, and support for reintegration into the community.
Overall, addressing the issue of IPV and crimes against women will require a comprehensive, coordinated response from all sectors of the criminal justice system, as well as collaboration with community organizations and other agencies to provide support to victims and prevent future violence.
Why was it important to establish the Clean Air Act? to reduce the need to study the effects of dirty air on human health to determine ways to reduce the number of premature deaths per year to create a regulation that makes any activities that pollute the air illegal to raise the cost of air purification techniques to ensure the efficiency of removing air pollution.
Answer:
Because of the Act, Americans breathe less pollution and face lower risks of premature death and other serious health effects.
It was important to establish the Clean Air Act because it helped: B. to determine ways to reduce the number of premature deaths per year.
What is the Clean Air Act?The Clean Air Act can be defined as an amendment of 1990 that was enacted by the U.S Congress, so as to prohibit service-related production and consumption of all refrigerants and other hazardous substances (chemical compounds).
Basically, the main purpose for the establishment of the Clean Air Act is to help determine efficient and effective ways to reduce air pollution, as well as the number of premature deaths per year in America.
In the United States of America, the Clean Air Act limits the consumption and production of the following chemical compounds:
Nitrogen dioxideChlorofluorocarbonsCarbon monoxideRead more on Clean Air Act here: https://brainly.com/question/16804832
#SPJ2
is it true or false Both the Senate and House of Representatives contain the same number of members from each state.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
the senate contains one hundred and the house varies
Evaluate the following statement: “If a signature on a check is forged, the customer will never be responsible for the amount on the check.”
Scenario 2) Tired of losing court battles over water rights of the Rio Grande, New Mexico's
governor orders the creation of an army to "defend the water rights of New Mexico against Texas
aggression."
Why is this unconstitutional?
Answer:
Because two states in the U.S. can't go to war,
Explanation:
States can not go to war or declare wars. To fix this they can meet a compromise.
Q1: Identify the sources of Canadian laws and distinguish their
components.
Q2: Describe the structure of the courts in Canada and
illustrate the litigation process.
Q3: Explain the following with sim
Q1: Sources of Canadian laws and their components:
Canadian law is a blend of civil law and common law, and there are three sources of Canadian law that must be recognized:
1. Federal Law: Federal laws are laws passed by the Canadian Parliament, which is made up of the House of Commons and the Senate. The laws apply uniformly throughout Canada. The Canadian Constitution Act of 1867 enumerates the various topics on which the Canadian Parliament has the power to pass legislation, including criminal law, copyrights, and patents, as well as immigration and extradition law.
2. Provincial and Territorial Law: Provincial and territorial laws are established by provincial and territorial governments in Canada. In Canada, each province has its legislature and passes laws that apply to its residents.
3. Common Law: Case law, or common law, is the third source of Canadian law. This includes rulings made by Canadian courts over time. Courts use prior legal precedent, or similar case decisions, to reach a decision, and that decision becomes law.
Q2: Structure of the Courts in Canada and Litigation Process:
In Canada, there are two types of courts:
Superior and Inferior. The superior courts of the provinces and territories include the Provincial Courts of Appeal, the Superior Courts of the province, and the Territorial Courts of Appeal. The Federal Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court of Canada are the superior courts of Canada .The Provincial Court is the lowest level of court.
It has two divisions:
criminal and civil. The Provincial Court has the authority to hear a variety of criminal cases, as well as family law, civil, and traffic cases. The Supreme Court of Canada is Canada's highest court. Appeals from both the Federal Court of Canada and the superior courts in the provinces and territories can be heard by the Supreme Court. The trial and appellate stages of the litigation process are the two main stages. The trial process includes pleadings, discovery, trial preparation, and the trial itself, while the appellate process includes the filing of a notice of appeal, the perfecting of the appeal, and the appeal hearing.
Q3: Explanation of the Following with Sim:
1. Homicide: Homicide is the act of killing someone else, whether intentionally or unintentionally. For example, if you are driving recklessly and accidentally hit someone, you have committed homicide.
2. Assault: Assault is the act of causing harm to someone else, whether intentionally or unintentionally. For example, if you hit someone with a baseball bat, you have committed assault.
3. Sexual Assault: Sexual assault is a type of assault that involves sexual contact with someone without their consent. For example, if you force someone to have sexual intercourse with you, you have committed sexual assault.
Learn more about Parliament from:
https://brainly.com/question/3710026
#SPJ11
what would be a reason for a government not to intervene with a particular externality?
One reason for a government not to intervene with a particular externality is that the cost of intervention may exceed the benefits gained from it.
An externality is a positive or negative effect of a product or service that is experienced by people other than the buyer or seller. An externality occurs when the activities of one economic agent have an impact on the welfare of another agent, yet the first agent does not take the effect into account when making their decision.
There are several reasons why the government might choose not to intervene with an externality. One of the reasons is that the cost of intervention may be greater than the benefits that can be gained from it. The government may not be able to justify the expense of intervention if it is not cost-effective.
Another reason why the government might choose not to intervene with an externality is that it may not have the legal authority to do so. The government may not have the power to regulate certain activities or enforce certain laws. In such cases, the government may have to rely on other mechanisms, such as taxes or subsidies, to address the externality.
The government may also choose not to intervene if there is a lack of information about the impact of the externality. If the government does not have enough data to make an informed decision, it may choose not to take any action until more information is available.In conclusion, one reason for a government not to intervene with a particular externality is that the cost of intervention may exceed the benefits gained from it.
Other reasons may include a lack of legal authority or information about the impact of the externality.
You can learn more about externality at
https://brainly.com/question/477170
#SPJ11
Consistent routines:
A. Are rigid.
B.Are used for outside time only.
C.Should be changed weekly.
D. Support predictability
Answer:
D. Support predictability
Explanation:
Predictable daily routines support young children in knowing what to expect and what is expected of them, leading to fewer disruptive behaviors. A consistent daily schedule and step-by-step routines give children a predictable day.
what type of communication rule would best describe csma/cd?
CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Collision Detection) is a communication rule that is used in Ethernet networks. In the context of communication rules, the best way to describe CSMA/CD is a protocol for medium access control.
CSMA/CD is utilized in Ethernet networks to regulate access to the shared transmission medium. It is a protocol that governs the way in which network nodes transmit data packets over the medium. A node must check the medium before transmitting a packet. If the medium is idle, the node may transmit the packet. If the medium is busy, the node must wait for some time before retrying to transmit the packet. When the node transmits a packet, it keeps an eye on the medium for any possible collisions. If a collision is detected, the node aborts the transmission and sends a jam signal. The node then waits for a random amount of time before retrying the transmission.CSMA/CD is a key protocol that governs medium access control in Ethernet networks. Its mechanism for regulating network access and detecting collisions is critical to ensuring that packets are transmitted and received correctly. Therefore, it is essential to understand the operation of CSMA/CD in Ethernet networks.
For more such questions on Ethernet
https://brainly.com/question/1637942
#SPJ11
Discretionary release places great faith in the ability of the parole board members to:
a. link inmate treatment with the level of custody.
b. predict future offender behavior.
c. assess readiness for permanent release to community.
d. all of these.
Discretionary release places great faith in the ability of the parole board members to link inmate treatment with the level of custody, predict future offender behavior, and assess readiness for permanent release to community. Therefore, the correct options are D: all of these.
Discretionary release places great faith in the ability of the parole board members to:
a. Linking inmate treatment with the level of custody: Parole board members need to evaluate how an inmate's behavior and progress in treatment programs relates to their custody level. This helps determine if they are ready for a reduced level of supervision.
b. Predicting future offender behavior: The parole board members have to assess the likelihood of an inmate reoffending upon release. They need to consider various factors, such as the inmate's criminal history, behavior in prison, and participation in rehabilitation programs.
c. Assessing readiness for permanent release to the community: Parole board members must determine if an inmate has made sufficient progress in their rehabilitation and poses a low risk to the community upon release. This requires a thorough evaluation of the inmate's behavior, achievements, and overall readiness for reintegration into society.
Hence, the correct answer is option D: all of these including link inmate treatment with the level of custody, predict future offender behavior, and assess readiness for permanent release to community.
Learn more about Discretionary release:
https://brainly.com/question/29643892
#SPJ11
1. You may drive off of the paved roadway to pass another vehicle
Answer: The answer is false.
Explanation: To pass another vehicle, you must never drive off the paved or main-traveled area of the road and onto the shoulder.
We cannot drive off of the paved roadway to pass another vehicle. To pass another vehicle, we must never drive off the paved or main-traveled area of the road and onto the shoulder.
The given statement is false.
What is a paved roadway?Paved road is defined as an improved street, highway, alley, public way, or easement that is covered by concrete or asphaltic concrete, excluding access roadways that connect a facility to a public paved roadway but are not open to through traffic.
On a two-way street, keep left to allow traffic from the opposite direction to pass on your right, and keep right on a one-way street to allow vehicles behind you to overtake from the right.
When we turn left, stay to the left side of the road you're leaving as well as the one you're entering. When turning right, move to the center of the exiting road and then to the left side of the entering road.
Therefore, drive off of the paved roadway to pass another vehicle is not possible any under any circumstances.
To learn more on paved roadway, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15488796
#SPJ2
What are the categories of controlled substances and how are they different from one another?
Controlled substances are drugs and other substances that are regulated by the government due to their potential for abuse and dependence, as well as their medical benefits. There are five categories, or schedules, of controlled substances in the United States, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act:
Schedule I: This category includes drugs that have no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Examples include heroin, LSD, and marijuana.
Schedule II: This category includes drugs that have a high potential for abuse and dependence, but also have some accepted medical uses. Examples include oxycodone, fentanyl, and Adderall.
Schedule III: This category includes drugs that have a moderate to low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include codeine and anabolic steroids.
Schedule IV: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include Xanax and Ambien.
Schedule V: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include cough medicines that contain codeine.
The categories are differentiated based on the substance's medical uses, potential for abuse, and likelihood of causing dependence. The stricter regulations on Schedule I substances reflect the fact that they are considered to have a higher potential for harm and abuse, while Schedule V substances are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse and dependence. The schedules are used to guide the regulation of these substances, including their manufacture, distribution, and prescription.