write 5 sentences using the past perfect tense.
write 3 sentences using the past simple tense.​

If you were giving a speech on prostate cancer, telling a story about someone who has suffered from the illness would be a good way to begin the speech and capture the audience's attention.

Learn more about speech: https://brainly.com/question/26157848

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

With no knowledge of the English language, my grandfather, Olav Kaldestad,

immigrated to The United States with a dream and in search for an opportunity to

achieve a successful job and provide an even better future for his family. Coming from a

poor childhood in a different country came with struggles. He overcame those hardships

and worked hard to provide for his family and sent all three of his children through

college and they have achieved their American Dream as well. As proved by my

grandfather, there is an American Dream. The American Dream is an idea that America

gives the opportunity for anyone to succeed, however success itself is defined by the

individual. The accessibility of this idea that was once the pinnacle of living in America is

being challenged, but should it be? The American Dream is still accessible because

those who strive for their own idea of happiness can achieve it and those who take

advantage of the wealth of opportunities available can reach their dream, but because it

has changed to be focused on money, for those who wealth alone is the dream, it may

not be accessible to all.

Answer:

The repetition of “if” in the poem “if” by Rudyard Kipling contributes to the poem’s overall meaning by emphasizing the importance of making the right choices in life. Each stanza begins with the word “if” and presents a hypothetical scenario and its outcome based on the speaker’s advice. The repetition of “if” highlights the conditional nature of these outcomes and serves to reinforce the idea that our choices and actions have consequences. It also implies that life is full of uncertainty and that our success or failure depends on our ability to navigate the challenges we face with wisdom, courage, and perseverance. By repeatedly using the word “if,” Kipling emphasizes the importance of foresight, discipline, and integrity in achieving success and becoming a virtuous person.

B: by describing the narrator’s background, B: The narrator discusses tools and quality of work with Ben.

A narrator is the person telling the story in a literary work. The narrator can be a character within the story, an unseen presence, or even an outside narrator that is not a character in the story. The narrator's role is to provide the story's context, plot, characters, and settings. Depending on the type of story, the narrator can either be omniscient, meaning they know all of the events that occur within the story, or limited, meaning they only have knowledge of certain characters or events. The narrator's point of view, or perspective, can greatly influence how the story unfolds.

The narrator's background is revealed through the conversations he has with Ben, specifically regarding tools and quality of work. This detail best supports the answer to Part A because it shows how the author uses the narrator's conversations to develop the point of view of the narrator.

Therefore, the correct option for Part A is B and For Part B is B.
To learn more about narrator
https://brainly.com/question/1934766
#SPJ1

Answer: The answer is B. The removal of the small box hints at a secret or hidden act that one character my commit later, thus creating anxiety about what will happen.

Explanation:

A Makes absolutely no sense in any way.

C Doesn't make any sense either, because why would the small box be metal, just because they were in a living room?

D doesn't quite add up either because since we don't know what is in the box, or why the character took the box we don't know that it's for some evil reason. The character who took the box might know that there is something in the box that will hurt the other character, but because they did it in secret, it might indicate the character can't be trusted. So it might be D, but it's less likely than B, I think.

Suspense is created by telling the audience something that the main character, or a secondary character doesn't know, so now you, the audience, has information that a certain character does not -- you know that the other character took the box off the self, but the looking away character does not know that. Now suspense is forming as you wonder why the character took the box, what's in the box, and why they took it in secret.

I hope this helps! Have a great weekend!

Answer: The removal of the small box hints at a secret or hidden act that one character may commit later, thus creating anxiety about what will happen.

Answer:

Hannah woke up and realized something -- today was her friend's birthday! And she hasn't even gotten her a present yet. The part wouldn't start till two, so she had plenty of time. Hannah quickly got dressed and combed her hair. She went out the door before even having breakfast so she could get to the store before there were a line of shoppers.

:) Dunno if you wanted a short story or not.

Explanation:

In general, sports that require continuous adaptations for safety may be worth the time, effort, and money for several reasons:

Improved safety: The continuous adaptations for safety in a sport can help prevent injuries and make the sport safer for participants. This can lead to a decrease in injuries, which can be beneficial for both the athletes and the sport itself.

Innovation: The need for continuous adaptations for safety can also lead to innovation in the sport. This innovation can lead to new techniques, equipment, or rules that can improve the sport overall.

Competition: Some athletes may be drawn to sports that require continuous adaptations for safety because it can add an extra level of challenge and excitement. This can make the sport more interesting for both participants and spectators.

On the other hand, some people may feel that sports that require continuous adaptations for safety are not worth the time, effort, and money because:

Cost: The constant need for safety adaptations can make the sport more expensive to participate in or watch. This can make the sport less accessible for some people.

Fatigue: The constant need for safety adaptations can also be mentally and physically exhausting for athletes, which can lead to burnout or injury.

Effectiveness: Despite the safety adaptations, some sports may still be inherently dangerous and not worth the risk.

Ultimately, whether a sport that requires continuous adaptations for safety is worth the time, effort, and money is a personal decision that depends on individual preferences, values, and priorities.

"Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting."  best portrays Zaroff as Rainsford’s foil.

"The Most Dangerous Game" is a story about a man who hunts the animals for fun.

This story is written by Richard Connell.

This story happens in the Caribbean Sea.

Zaroff loved hunting, he killed animal for fun.

Thus, the "Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting."  best portrays Zaroff as Rainsford’s foil.

Learn more about  "The Most Dangerous Game", here:

https://brainly.com/question/1100861

Answer:

C; "Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting."

"Hunting? General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder.”

Explanation:

just took the test

Answer:

able

Explanation:

When the root has other forms built on the letter a, the -able form is used. When the root ends in hard c or g, -able is used. When the word has an immediate -tion form, -ible is used. When the root ends in ns, miss, or soft c or g, -ible is used.

In paragraph 18, Federigo personifies fortune, showing it as someone who continues to impede his happiness and with whom he maintains an antagonistic relationship, as shown in option C.

We can arrive at this answer because:

We must emphasize that personification is the figure of speech that allows animals and inanimate beings to have human capacity and characteristics.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/15657790

The context clues show that Arthur Miller revealed some deep tragedies in his character's lives.

Context clues are the hints that are given by an author in a literary work.

In this case, Arthur Miller revealed some deep tragedies in his character's lives. This was important to shape the audience and develop the theme.

Learn more about context clues on:

https://brainly.com/question/1330487

The correct and suitable answer from the given passage is the women killed her husband and police were came to investigate the house and found the things were broken in the home .

Mrs. Wright husband not giving the time to her and also not share his feeling and became very cold hearten and thus may occur the confusion in the mind of Mrs, Wright that her hush band had an affair with other women .

After found the evidence Mrs. Wright killed her hush band and police found the broken jar in the room which she used to hit on the head of her hush band .

For more information on knowledge , please refer the below link :

https://brainly.com/question/14506911

Answer:

B. an understanding that Mrs. Wright is considered responsible for the home

Explanation:

trust :)

John inquires about Elizabeth's course of action, but his query turns out to be rhetorical. He is aware that she would never lie under duress.

There are numerous occasions in the play where the Crucible themes of reputation, honor, and integrity are displayed. In the play, many characters struggle with the choice of whether to uphold their honor and integrity or their reputation.

As the residents of Salem struggle to come to terms with the terrible incidents that have occurred in their town, Act 4 of The Crucible emphasizes the themes of regret, forgiveness, and piety. Act 4's.

To learn more about crucible from given link

https://brainly.com/question/936016

#SPJ1

Answer:

kill him

Explanation:

murder I am so smart I know

All bilingual kids are masters of their native tongues and bring a wealth of knowledge that should be valued. Give bilingual kids the time and space to think and communicate in all of their languages.

Invite kids to share what they know in their own languages, for instance, during partner work. Speaking with a partner who speaks the same native tongue will be beneficial for all multilingual learners, regardless of how fluent their English is or how new to it they are. Their learning is reinforced when they discuss and think in both of their languages.

Additionally, it will aid language acquisition to encourage multilingual students to draw links between new English words and ideas they currently understand. You might ask kids to demonstrate their linguistic prowess by sharing

To know more about muiltilingual click on the linkhttps://brainly.com/question/28629917

#SPJ4

Answer:

the aspect of someone's character that is presented to or perceived by others.

"her public persona"

Explanation:

the character of someone presented by their own or by others which may be good or bad is defined as the word'Persona'.

Answer:

Here's the correct order of the arguments presented in Susan B. Anthony's "Is It a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote?":

1. People are born with rights.

2. Governments are set up to protect rights.

3. Governments do not have the power to give rights.

4. Governments derive their power from people's will.

5. All citizens have a right to participate in government.

6. Women cannot express their consent to be governed if they cannot vote.

In the first paragraph, Susan B. Anthony argues that our government is based on the idea that every individual has the natural right to a voice and a vote in making and executing laws. She then claims that governments exist to secure people's unalienable rights, rather than to grant them rights. In the following paragraph, she cites the Declaration of Independence, which asserts that all men are created equal and endowed with certain unalienable rights, and that governments are instituted among men to secure these rights. Anthony argues that this includes the right to vote, since the consent of the governed cannot be given if the right to vote is denied. Finally, she concludes that women, as well as men, have a natural right to the ballot and should not be denied it.

Explanation:

I hope this helps!! Have a good day/night!!

Answer:

option A,B,D

Explanation:

hope it help you

The two punctuation marks that can come before a small quote (less than five lines) are a comma and a colon.

A comma is used when the introductory text is a complete sentence and the quote is used as supporting evidence or an example. For example:

John said, "I will be there in five minutes."

A colon is used when the introductory text is not a complete sentence, but rather introduces the quote or provides context. For example:

The following quote summarizes his argument: "The only way to do great work is to love what you do."

To introduce a list: The colon is often used to introduce a list of items, ideas, or examples.

For example, "The grocery list includes: milk, eggs, bread, and cheese."

Learn more about punctuation marks here:

https://brainly.com/question/22817712

#SPJ4

Leslie Sanders frequently found herself in trouble during Daily Reading Theme Week 1.

During Daily Reading Theme Week 1, Leslie Sanders encountered numerous instances of trouble.

It became a recurring pattern for Leslie Sanders to get into trouble throughout the week.

The troubles that Leslie faced seemed to happen on a daily basis, hence the name "Daily Reading Theme Week 1."

Leslie's frequent entanglements in problematic situations during this specific week became a notable occurrence.

It can be inferred that Leslie's tendency to attract trouble was particularly prominent during the first week of the Daily Reading Theme.

Each day of the week, Leslie found herself embroiled in various problematic situations, causing disruptions and challenges.

The consistent trouble that Leslie encountered during Daily Reading Theme Week 1 was a source of concern and perhaps frustration for those involved.

Leslie's repeated involvement in troublesome incidents throughout the week raised questions about the reasons behind her consistent misfortunes.

The incidents that Leslie faced during this week were significant enough to label her as someone who frequently got into trouble.

In summary, Leslie Sanders faced a series of troubles during Daily Reading Theme Week 1, which led to concerns and questions about her propensity for getting into problematic situations.

For more such questions on frequently, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29806804

#SPJ8

two soloists singing together followed by homophonic chorus

A homophonic chorus is a sort of choral texture in which all voices or parts sing in harmony, but with one voice or part frequently standing out as the melody or focal point. The voices move together in rhythm and harmony in this texture, providing a rich and full sound that is instantly recognisable in many forms of music, including hymns, pop songs, and classical pieces.The name "homophonic" comes from the Greek terms "homo," which means "same," and "phonic," which means "sound." This indicates that in homophonic music, all of the voices or instruments sing the same tune at the same time, but with various pitches and harmonies.Homophonic chorus is frequently utilised in music to give a sense of unity, harmony, and force.

To know more about Homophone, click on the link :

https://brainly.com/question/13077552

#SPJ1

In the short story "Just Do It" by Heather Lindsley, the author portrays Tom as dangerously oblivious through his actions and behavior. Tom consistently disregards the potential consequences of his actions, displaying a lack of awareness and understanding of the dangers around him.

Tom's obliviousness is evident from the beginning of the story when he casually accepts a strange woman's invitation to try a new product called "Just Do It," without questioning its nature or potential risks. Despite warnings from his wife and friends, Tom remains dismissive and fails to grasp the gravity of the situation. He proceeds to use the product recklessly, ignoring any potential harm it may cause.

Furthermore, as Tom's behavior becomes increasingly erratic and his actions more reckless, it becomes evident that he is dangerously oblivious. He continues to push the limits, engaging in extreme activities without considering the consequences. Tom's lack of concern for his own safety and the well-being of those around him highlights his dangerous obliviousness.

Through these narrative choices, Lindsley effectively demonstrates Tom's dangerous obliviousness, showcasing his disregard for caution and the potential harm he puts himself and others in. The author emphasizes the importance of being aware of the potential dangers in one's environment and the need to consider the consequences of one's actions.

Learn more about author here:

https://brainly.com/question/32655606

#SPJ11

Answer:

One example of a mutualistic relationship is that of the oxpecker (a kind of bird) and the rhinoceros or zebra. The oxpeckers get food and the beasts get pest control.

Explanation:

A mutualistic relationship is when two organisms of different species "work together," each benefiting from the relationship.

the correct answer is abolitionist

Answer:

abolitionist

Explanation:

Popular abolitionists such as Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, and John Brown led the abolitionist movement to abolish slavery.

I uploаded the аnswer to а file hosting. Here's link:

xlnk․cf/tcMG

Answer:

Bebe café.

No estudia por la tarde.

¿Habla con mi madre?

Explanation:

The New Rumi Spelling (Ejaan Rumi Baharu) were two spelling reform programs that Indonesia and Malaysian both implemented in 1972 as part of an effort to harmonize spelling disparities between the two nations.

Malay and Indonesian share common ancestry and are typically comprehensible to one another. Yet it's obvious that they're different and distinct! There are characteristics that distinguish the two, including as differences in pronunciation, intonation, spelling, vocabulary, and phrases.

While the two dialects can typically be understood one another, there are clear distinctions between them in terms of vocabulary, spelling, grammar, pronunciation, and loanword usage. The differences can be completely nonsensical to one another or more closely related to one another.

Joint Rumi Spelling, also known as Ejaan Rumi Bersama (ERB), is the most recent spelling change for the Malay language's Latin-derived Rumi alphabet.

To know more about MALAYSIAN visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18043683

#SPJ1